🎯 CVE-2026-42812 🇪🇺 EUVD
📄 .md Alle CVEs anzeigen ✕

CVE-2026-42812 | In Apache Iceberg, the table's metadata files are control files: they tell readers which data files belong to the table and which table version to read. `write.metadata.path` is an optional table property that tells Polaris where to write those metadata files. For a table already registered in a Polaris-managed catalog, changing only that property through an `ALTER TABLE`-style settings change (not a row-level `INSERT`, `SELECT`, `UPDATE`, or `DELETE`) by

In Apache Iceberg, the table's metadata files are control files: they tell readers
which data files belong to the table and which table version to read.



`write.metadata.path` is an optional table property that tells Polaris
where to
write those metadata files.
For a table already registered in a
Polaris-managed
catalog, changing only that property through an `ALTER TABLE`-style settings
change (not a row-level `INSERT`, `SELECT`, `UPDATE`, or `DELETE`) bypasses
the commit-time branch that is supposed to revalidate storage locations.

The full persisted / credential-vending variant requires the affected
catalog
to have `polaris.config.allow.unstructured.table.location=true`, with
`allowedLocations` broad enough to include the attacker-chosen target.


`allowedLocations` is the admin-configured allowlist of storage paths that
the
catalog is allowed to use. Public project materials suggest that this flag
is a
real supported compatibility / layout mode, not just a contrived lab-only
prerequisite.


In that configuration, a user who can change table settings can cause Apache Polaris
itself to write new table metadata to an attacker-chosen reachable storage
location before the intended location-validation branch runs.

If the later concrete-path validation also accepts that location, Polaris
persists the resulting metadata path into stored table state. Later
table-load
and credential APIs can then return temporary cloud-storage credentials for
the
same location without revalidating it. In plain terms, Polaris can later
hand
out temporary storage access for the same attacker-chosen area.

That attacker-chosen area does not need to be limited to the poisoned
table's
own files. If it is a broader storage prefix, another table's prefix, or,
depending on configuration or provider behavior, even a bucket/container
root,
the resulting disclosure or corruption scope can extend to any data and
metadata Polaris can reach there.



The practical consequences are therefore similar to the staged-create
credential-vending issue already discussed: data and metadata reachable in
that
storage scope can be exposed and, if write-capable credentials are later
issued, modified, corrupted, or removed. Even before that later credential
step, Polaris itself performs the metadata write to the unchecked location.

So the core issue is not only later credential vending.

The primary defect
is
that Polaris skips its intended location checks before performing a
security-
sensitive metadata write when only `write.metadata.path` changes.



When `polaris.config.allow.unstructured.table.location=false`, current code
review suggests the later `updateTableLike(...)` validation usually rejects
out-of-tree metadata locations before the unsafe path is persisted. That may
reduce the persisted / credential-vending variant, but it does not prevent
the
underlying defect: Polaris still skips the intended pre-write location check
when only `write.metadata.path` changes.

Klassifikation & Betroffenheit:
Apache Software Foundation Apache Polaris 0 <1.4.1apache polaris *
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') 🎯 Medium

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.

🛡️ Empfohlene Mitigation: Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Vollständige Definition bei MITRE ➔
🩹 Patch verfügbar (OSV):
🩹 9569f2d24c08f926cf768290fda7680cdb1e1611 (Commit)
📚 Referenzen & Quellen:
Ausnutzungs-Zeitleiste:
CVSS-Vektor-Analyse: 9.4
AV · Angriffsvektor Netzwerk
AC · Komplexität Gering
PR · Privilegien Gering
UI · Interaktion Keine
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
Veröffentlicht:04.05.2026
Aktualisiert:17.06.2026 10:48
Assigner (CNA):apache
EUVD-ID:EUVD-2026-27039
Quellen: 🇪🇺 EUVD-Datenbank (ENISA) + 🇺🇸 NVD-Anreicherung · 24-h-Cache
CWE-94: Code Injection ✓ Offizieller Patch / Advisory verfügbar
💡 Gegenmaßnahme: Sicherheits-Update des Herstellers zeitnah einspielen und Netzwerksegmentierung prüfen.
🔴 Live Security Advisory & EPSS Exploit Radar

Zero-Day & Vulnerability Intelligence Hub

Echtzeit-Tracking mit EPSS Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeiten, Angriffsvektor-Decodern und KI-Patch-Anleitungen.

366k+ 🇪🇺 EUVD-Datenbank
1 🔴 Critical im Radar
0 ⚠️ CISA KEV
0 🔓 Aktiv ausgenutzt
0 🧪 PoC verfügbar
📊 Historien-Charts — Criticals-Trend · Vendors · EPSS-Verteilung
🔴 Criticals pro Monat (12 M) 2025-09: 94 2025-10: 317 2025-11: 257 2025-12: 426 2026-01: 431 2026-02: 417 2026-03: 649 2026-04: 574 2026-05: 683 2026-06: 941 2026-07: 1327 2026-08: 1828 2026-09: 949 8.893 Criticals gesamt
🏢 Top-Vendor-Veröffentlichungen (6 M) Adobe Apple Google Linux Microsoft Oracle Corporation
● Adobe ● Apple ● Google ● Linux ● Microsoft ● Oracle
📈 EPSS-Verteilung (Messungen)
Tier2026-08-312026-09-19
≥90 %0538
≥50 %01603
≥10 %017
<10 %30056400
📈 EPSS-Riser (7 Tage) CVE-2022-2900 ↑ 0.24 %
Frühindikator · FIRST.org
Datenquellen & Methodik: Primärquelle ist die EUVD der ENISA (laufender Datenbank-Sync, alle 15 Minuten), abgeglichen mit dem CISA-KEV-Katalog und der NVD — Detail-Dossiers reichern fehlende Felder live per NVD an — mit Fallback auf CIRCL vulnerability-lookup (EU/Non-Profit, aggregiert CVE-, GitHub- und OSV-Advisories). Der CISA-KEV-Katalog (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities, ~1.700 aktiv ausgenutzte Schwachstellen) wird bei jedem Sync vollständig neu geladen und kreuzreferenziert — filterbar über die KEV-Pille. CVSS 3.1 wird nach Ampel-Logik aus Verteidigersicht dekodiert; EPSS bezeichnet die 30-Tage-Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit (FIRST.org).
🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD 🇺🇸 NVD ⚠️ CISA KEV ⚡ EPSS
Ökosystem & Hersteller Bedrohungs-Matrix:
Schweregrad & Status:
Hersteller (Datenbank-weit, 96.230 Einträge):
Quelle:
Schwachstellen-Kategorie (CWE):
🔍
EPSS 37%
CVE-2026-42812 🌐 Netzwerk (Remote) 🔑 Geringe Nutzerrechte nötig
Apache Software Foundation

CVE-2026-42812 | In Apache Iceberg, the table's metadata files are control files: they tell readers which data files belong to the table and which table version to read. `write.metadata.path` is an optional table property that tells Polaris where to write those metadata files. For a table already registered in a Polaris-managed catalog, changing only that property through an `ALTER TABLE`-style settings change (not a row-level `INSERT`, `SELECT`, `UPDATE`, or `DELETE`) by

In Apache Iceberg, the table's metadata files are control files: they tell readers which data files belong to the table and which table version to read. `write.metadata.path` is an optional table property that tells Polaris where to writ

CWE-94: Code Injection ✓ Offizieller Patch / Advisory verfügbar
💡 Gegenmaßnahme: Sicherheits-Update des Herstellers zeitnah einspielen und Netzwerksegmentierung prüfen.