---
cve: "CVE-2026-72811"
severity: "CRITICAL"
cvss: 9.9
epss: "0.4%"
vendor: "siyuan-note"
kev: false
exploited: false
published: "2026-08-14 12:16:43"
tags: [cve, security, critical]
source: tsecurity.de CVE-Dossier
exported: "2026-10-23T01:34:17+02:00"
---

# CVE-2026-72811

> 9.9 CRITICAL · 🧪 PoC

## Beschreibung

SiYuan versions <= v3.7.2 contain a SQL injection vulnerability in the backlink/mention search query (kernel/model/backlink.go), which concatenates stored block metadata (title, name, alias, anchor text) and the client-supplied keyword into a SQL MATCH/search statement while escaping only the double-quote character and not the single quote. A single quote in the client keyword (first-order, reachable by an anonymous or RoleReader user on the publish surface) or in stored document metadata (second-order) breaks out of the string literal. Because the query runs on the main read-write siyuan.db handle via a statement-stacking-capable driver, an attacker can execute arbitrary SQL, enabling cross-notebook read and write. Fixed in v3.7.4.

## CNA-Record (Kanon, cvelistV5)

- CNA: **VulnCheck**
- State: PUBLISHED
- Stand: 2026-08-14 16:52:14
- CNA-CVSS: **9.9** (`CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N`)

## CISA-Anreicherung (vulnrichment/ADP)

- CISA-SSVC (Coordinator, v2.0.3):
  - Exploitation: **none**
  - Automatable: **yes**
  - Technical Impact: **total**

## CVSS-Vektor

```
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N
```

| Metrik | Wert | Bewertung |
|---|---|---|
| AV Angriffsvektor | Netzwerk | bad |
| AC Komplexität | Gering | bad |
| PR Privilegien | Keine | bad |
| UI Interaktion | Keine | bad |

## Schwachstellen-Klasse

- **CWE-89** — Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
  The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as…

## Angriffsmuster (CAPEC)

- [CAPEC-7 — Blind SQL Injection](https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/7.html) _(Severity: High)_
- [CAPEC-66 — SQL Injection](https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/66.html) _(Severity: High)_
- [CAPEC-108 — Command Line Execution through SQL Injection](https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/108.html) _(Severity: Very High)_
- [CAPEC-109 — Object Relational Mapping Injection](https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/109.html) _(Severity: High)_
- [CAPEC-110 — SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering](https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/110.html) _(Severity: Very High)_
- [CAPEC-470 — Expanding Control over the Operating System from the Database](https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/470.html) _(Severity: Very High)_

## Referenzen

- <https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/security/advisories/GHSA-q2vg-7qgx-x5fc>
- <https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/siyuan-before-sql-injection-via-backlink-search>

---
_Exportiert aus dem [tsecurity.de CVE-Dossier](https://tsecurity.de/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-72811/) · Datenquellen: EUVD (ENISA), NVD, OSV, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, Exploit-DB, BSI WID (CSAF)_
