CVE-2026-90171: Schwachstellen-Eintrag (NVD)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

smb: smbdirect: release pending child sockets outside the handler lock

smbdirect_socket_destroy() releases the listener's pending/ready child
sockets while still holding the listener's handler lock, the
&id_priv->handler_mutex taken via rdma_lock_handler(), not
sc->listen.lock, and before the listener's own rdma_destroy_id().
That ordering has one real consequence and one cosmetic one.

The real one: smbdirect_socket_release() drops the child's last
reference, which destroys the child's cm_id. Doing that before the
listener's rdma_destroy_id() lets _cma_cancel_listens(), running from
the listener's _destroy_id(), walk an already freed child id_priv,
which KASAN catches as a slab-use-after-free during listener shutdown:

[ 4758.909130] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock+0x1469/0x1560
[ 4758.911450] Read of size 1 at addr ffff88821c381db4 by task ksmbd.control/1652
[ 4758.913262] Call Trace:
[ 4758.913267]
[ 4758.913299] __mutex_lock+0x1469/0x1560
[ 4758.913408] _cma_cancel_listens+0x312/0x3b0
[ 4758.913413] _destroy_id+0x363/0xee0
[ 4758.913417] smbdirect_socket_destroy_sync+0x17d5/0x2440
[ 4758.913443] smbdirect_socket_release+0x124/0x230
[ 4758.913451] ksmbd_rdma_stop_listening+0x9f/0x190
[ 4758.913457] ksmbd_conn_transport_destroy+0x65/0x3c0
[ 4758.913463] kill_server_store+0x1fb/0x2b0
[ 4758.913501] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x349/0x4d0
[ 4758.913507] vfs_write+0x5e7/0xc70
[ 4758.913528] ksys_write+0x12a/0x210
[ 4758.913541] do_syscall_64+0x135/0x460
[ 4758.913555] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

The cosmetic one: releasing a child recurses into
smbdirect_socket_destroy(), which takes the child's own
rdma_lock_handler() lock nested under the listener's. The listener's
and the child's cm_id are always different instances, so this cannot
deadlock for real; the CM core itself nests a new connection id's
handler_mutex under the listening id's in cma_ib_req_handler(). But
lockdep only sees one lock class, reports possible recursive locking,
and then disables itself, hiding real locking bugs for the rest of the
run:

[ 2424.579653] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 2424.581180] 7.1.0-next-20260623+ #89 Not tainted
[ 2424.582548] --------------------------------------------
[ 2424.584500] ksmbd.control/8854 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 2424.586817] ffff888102303c20 (&id_priv->handler_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: smbdirect_socket_destroy_sync+0xc39/0x2440
[ 2424.590590]
[ 2424.590590] but task is already holding lock:
[ 2424.591601] ffff888102046c20 (&id_priv->handler_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: smbdirect_socket_destroy_sync+0xc39/0x2440
[ 2424.594178]
[ 2424.594178] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 2424.596634] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 2424.596634]
[ 2424.598841] CPU0
[ 2424.599765] ----
[ 2424.600695] lock(&id_priv->handler_mutex);
[ 2424.601836] lock(&id_priv->handler_mutex);
[ 2424.602590]
[ 2424.602590] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 2424.602590]
[ 2424.604512] May be due to missing lock nesting notation

Splice the pending/ready children onto a local list under the
listener's listen.lock, while the handler lock is held so a concurrent
CM CONNECT_REQUEST cannot add more, but defer the actual
smbdirect_socket_release() calls until after the listener's cm_id has
been destroyed and its handler lock dropped. The children are
independent sockets whose teardown needs neither the listener's
handler lock nor its cm_id.

Found with ksmbdzzer [2], a KSMBD fuzzer that drives libFuzzer with a
kcov-dataflow [1] coverage vector: it folds each instrumented
comparison/argument's runtime operand value together with its PC (the
default arm mixes them as pc⊕val) so that a new operand value at a known
site counts as new coverage.

[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/1077606/
[2] https://github.com/yskzalloc/kcov-dataflow

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') 🎯 Medium

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.

🛡️ Empfohlene Mitigation: Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.

Vollständige Definition bei MITRE ➔

⚔️ Typische Angriffsmuster (CAPEC):

CAPEC-35 · Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executab… (Very High) CAPEC-77 · Manipulating User-Controlled Variables (Very High) CAPEC-242 · Code Injection (High)

🎯 ATT&CK-Techniken (Kill-Chain-Verhalten):

T1027.006 · Obfuscated Files or Information: H… T1027.009 · Obfuscated Files or Information: E… T1564.009 · Hide Artifacts: Resource Forking

🧩 Ähnliche Schwachstellen (Hersteller/Klasse/Score-Band):

CVE-2021-47476 4.6 CVE-2024-24857 4.6 CVE-2024-24858 4.6 CVE-2024-24859 4.6 CVE-2024-24860 4.6

🩹 Patch verfügbar (OSV):

🩹 Kernel ≥ 7.2.6

📰 Eigene Berichterstattung: ➔ CVE-2026-90171 | Linux Kernel up to 7.2.5 smbdirect smbdirect_socket_destroy use

📚 Referenzen & Quellen:

🇺🇸 NVD-Eintrag

Ausnutzungs-Zeitleiste:

Reserviert 2026

Veröffentlicht 09/2026

Heute 19.09.

Veröffentlicht:17.09.2026

Aktualisiert:17.09.2026 17:17

Assigner (CNA):NVD

Quellen: 🇪🇺 EUVD-Datenbank (ENISA) + 🇺🇸 NVD-Anreicherung · 24-h-Cache

CWE-94: Code Injection ✓ Offizieller Patch / Advisory verfügbar

💡 Gegenmaßnahme: Kernel-Paket aktualisieren (apt upgrade linux-image / yum update kernel) und System neu starten.

🔴 Live Security Advisory & EPSS Exploit Radar

Zero-Day & Vulnerability Intelligence Hub

Echtzeit-Tracking mit EPSS Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeiten, Angriffsvektor-Decodern und KI-Patch-Anleitungen.

🟢 SSE Realtime Synchronisiert ⚡ REST API (JSON) 📡 Digest (RSS) 📡 RSS Feed

366k+ 🇪🇺 EUVD-Datenbank

3 🔴 Critical im Radar

1 ⚠️ CISA KEV

0 🔓 Aktiv ausgenutzt

0 🧪 PoC verfügbar

6 🆕 Neu im KEV (7 T)

📊 Historien-Charts — Criticals-Trend · Vendors · EPSS-Verteilung

🔴 Criticals pro Monat (12 M) 8.857 Criticals gesamt

🏢 Top-Vendor-Veröffentlichungen (6 M)

● Adobe ● Apple ● Google ● Linux ● Microsoft ● Oracle

📈 EPSS-Verteilung (Messungen)

Tier	2026-08-30	2026-09-18
≥90 %	0	0
≥50 %	0	0
≥10 %	0	0
<10 %	300	300

📈 EPSS-Riser (7 Tage) CVE-2022-2900 ↑ 0.2 %

Frühindikator · FIRST.org

Datenquellen & Methodik: Primärquelle ist die EUVD der ENISA (laufender Datenbank-Sync, alle 15 Minuten), abgeglichen mit dem CISA-KEV-Katalog und der NVD — Detail-Dossiers reichern fehlende Felder live per NVD an — mit Fallback auf CIRCL vulnerability-lookup (EU/Non-Profit, aggregiert CVE-, GitHub- und OSV-Advisories). Der CISA-KEV-Katalog (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities, ~1.700 aktiv ausgenutzte Schwachstellen) wird bei jedem Sync vollständig neu geladen und kreuzreferenziert — filterbar über die KEV-Pille. CVSS 3.1 wird nach Ampel-Logik aus Verteidigersicht dekodiert; EPSS bezeichnet die 30-Tage-Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit (FIRST.org).

🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD 🇺🇸 NVD ⚠️ CISA KEV ⚡ EPSS

Ökosystem & Hersteller Bedrohungs-Matrix:

EPSS

29.1%

CVE-2026-29811 🌐 Netzwerk (Remote) 🔓 Keine Authentifizierung nötig

Generic Security

CVE-2026-29811 | CyberPanel up to 2.4.3 comparison using wrong factors

A vulnerability labeled as problematic has been found in CyberPanel up to 2.4.3. Affected is an unknown function. Executing a manipulation can lead to comparison using wrong factors. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2026-29811. The atta

CWE-94: Code Injection ✓ Offizieller Patch / Advisory verfügbar

💡 Gegenmaßnahme: Sicherheits-Update des Herstellers zeitnah einspielen und Netzwerksegmentierung prüfen.

19.09.2026