Ausnahme gefangen: SSL certificate problem: certificate is not yet valid ๐Ÿ“Œ CVE-2020-25600

๐Ÿ  Team IT Security News

TSecurity.de ist eine Online-Plattform, die sich auf die Bereitstellung von Informationen,alle 15 Minuten neuste Nachrichten, Bildungsressourcen und Dienstleistungen rund um das Thema IT-Sicherheit spezialisiert hat.
Ob es sich um aktuelle Nachrichten, Fachartikel, Blogbeitrรคge, Webinare, Tutorials, oder Tipps & Tricks handelt, TSecurity.de bietet seinen Nutzern einen umfassenden รœberblick รผber die wichtigsten Aspekte der IT-Sicherheit in einer sich stรคndig verรคndernden digitalen Welt.

16.12.2023 - TIP: Wer den Cookie Consent Banner akzeptiert, kann z.B. von Englisch nach Deutsch รผbersetzen, erst Englisch auswรคhlen dann wieder Deutsch!

Google Android Playstore Download Button fรผr Team IT Security



๐Ÿ“š CVE-2020-25600


๐Ÿ’ก Newskategorie: Sicherheitslรผcken
๐Ÿ”— Quelle: web.nvd.nist.gov

An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. Out of bounds event channels are available to 32-bit x86 domains. The so called 2-level event channel model imposes different limits on the number of usable event channels for 32-bit x86 domains vs 64-bit or Arm (either bitness) ones. 32-bit x86 domains can use only 1023 channels, due to limited space in their shared (between guest and Xen) information structure, whereas all other domains can use up to 4095 in this model. The recording of the respective limit during domain initialization, however, has occurred at a time where domains are still deemed to be 64-bit ones, prior to actually honoring respective domain properties. At the point domains get recognized as 32-bit ones, the limit didn't get updated accordingly. Due to this misbehavior in Xen, 32-bit domains (including Domain 0) servicing other domains may observe event channel allocations to succeed when they should really fail. Subsequent use of such event channels would then possibly lead to corruption of other parts of the shared info structure. An unprivileged guest may cause another domain, in particular Domain 0, to misbehave. This may lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) for the entire system. All Xen versions from 4.4 onwards are vulnerable. Xen versions 4.3 and earlier are not vulnerable. Only x86 32-bit domains servicing other domains are vulnerable. Arm systems, as well as x86 64-bit domains, are not vulnerable. ...



๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Advisory - Sourcetree - CVE-2017-14592 CVE-2017-14593 CVE-2017-14592 CVE-2017-17831


๐Ÿ“ˆ 4.72 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Mehrere Sicherheitslรผcken [CVE-2022-38023, CVE-2022-37966, CVE-2022-37967, CVE-2022-45141] in Samba


๐Ÿ“ˆ 4.72 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Reverse engineering Airspan AirSpot - Analysis of CVE-2022-36266, CVE-2022-36267, CVE-2022-36264, and CVE-2022-36265


๐Ÿ“ˆ 4.72 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Reverse engineering photovoltaic system F-logic DataCube3 - Analysis of CVE-2024-25833, CVE-2024-25832, CVE-2024-25830, and CVE-2024-25831


๐Ÿ“ˆ 4.72 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: CVE-2016-9277,CVE-2016-9966,CVE-2016-9967: Possible Privilege Escalation in telecom


๐Ÿ“ˆ 3.54 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: CVE-2016-9277,CVE-2016-9966,CVE-2016-9967: Possible Privilege Escalation in telecom


๐Ÿ“ˆ 3.54 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Multiple Security Updates Affecting TCP/IP:โ€ฏ CVE-2021-24074, CVE-2021-24094, and CVE-2021-24086


๐Ÿ“ˆ 3.54 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ CVE-2021-42133, CVE-2022-36971, & CVE-2022-36981: Multiple Ivanti Avalanche Code Execution Bugs


๐Ÿ“ˆ 3.54 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Multiple Security Updates Affecting TCP/IP:โ€ฏ CVE-2021-24074, CVE-2021-24094, and CVE-2021-24086


๐Ÿ“ˆ 3.54 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Multiple Security Updates Affecting TCP/IP:โ€ฏ CVE-2021-24074, CVE-2021-24094, and CVE-2021-24086


๐Ÿ“ˆ 3.54 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Microsoft patches three exploited zero-days (CVE-2023-21715, CVE-2023-23376, CVE-2023-21823)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 3.54 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: CVE-2015-7944, CVE-2015-7945 - Ganeti Security Advisory (DoS, Unauthenticated Info Leak)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Qualys Security Advisory - Roaming through the OpenSSH client: CVE-2016-0777 and CVE-2016-0778


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ [papers] - Roaming Through the OpenSSH Client: CVE-2016-0777 and CVE-2016-0778


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: [CVE-2016-0602, CVE-2016-0603] Executable installers are vulnerable^WEVIL (case 24): Oracle Java 6/7/8 SE and VirtualBox


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Re: [FD] [CVE-2016-0602, CVE-2016-0603] Executable installers are vulnerable^WEVIL (case 24): Oracle Java 6/7/8 SE and VirtualBox


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: CVE-2015-0061 and CVE-2015-0063 (MS16-009/MS16-011)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: [CVE-2016-1014, CVE-2016-4247] Executable installers are vulnerable^WEVIL (case 35): Adobe's Flash Player (un)installers


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: MySQL / MariaDB / PerconaDB - Root Privilege Escalation Exploit ( CVE-2016-6664 / CVE-2016-5617 )


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: PHPMailer < 5.2.20 Remote Code Execution PoC 0day Exploit (CVE-2016-10045) (Bypass of the CVE-2016-1033 patch)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: CVE-2015-7944, CVE-2015-7945 - Ganeti Security Advisory (DoS, Unauthenticated Info Leak)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Qualys Security Advisory - Roaming through the OpenSSH client: CVE-2016-0777 and CVE-2016-0778


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ [papers] - Roaming Through the OpenSSH Client: CVE-2016-0777 and CVE-2016-0778


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: [CVE-2016-0602, CVE-2016-0603] Executable installers are vulnerable^WEVIL (case 24): Oracle Java 6/7/8 SE and VirtualBox


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Re: [FD] [CVE-2016-0602, CVE-2016-0603] Executable installers are vulnerable^WEVIL (case 24): Oracle Java 6/7/8 SE and VirtualBox


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: CVE-2015-0061 and CVE-2015-0063 (MS16-009/MS16-011)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: [CVE-2016-1014, CVE-2016-4247] Executable installers are vulnerable^WEVIL (case 35): Adobe's Flash Player (un)installers


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: MySQL / MariaDB / PerconaDB - Root Privilege Escalation Exploit ( CVE-2016-6664 / CVE-2016-5617 )


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: PHPMailer < 5.2.20 Remote Code Execution PoC 0day Exploit (CVE-2016-10045) (Bypass of the CVE-2016-1033 patch)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Multiple Vulnerabilities in ASUS Routers [CVE-2017-5891 and CVE-2017-5892]


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Is CVE-2017-0199 the new CVE-2012-0158?


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Datto Windows Agent 1.0.5.0 Remote Command Execution [CVE-2017-16673][CVE-2017-16674]


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Advisory - Bamboo - CVE-2017-14589 CVE-2017-14590


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Multiple vulnerabilities in TP-Link products(CVE-2017-15613 to CVE-2017-15637)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: [CVE-2018-3667, CVE-2018-3668] Escalation of priviilege via executable installer of Intel Processor Diagnostic Tool


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte











matomo