Ausnahme gefangen: SSL certificate problem: certificate is not yet valid ๐Ÿ“Œ CVE-2020-25597

๐Ÿ  Team IT Security News

TSecurity.de ist eine Online-Plattform, die sich auf die Bereitstellung von Informationen,alle 15 Minuten neuste Nachrichten, Bildungsressourcen und Dienstleistungen rund um das Thema IT-Sicherheit spezialisiert hat.
Ob es sich um aktuelle Nachrichten, Fachartikel, Blogbeitrรคge, Webinare, Tutorials, oder Tipps & Tricks handelt, TSecurity.de bietet seinen Nutzern einen umfassenden รœberblick รผber die wichtigsten Aspekte der IT-Sicherheit in einer sich stรคndig verรคndernden digitalen Welt.

16.12.2023 - TIP: Wer den Cookie Consent Banner akzeptiert, kann z.B. von Englisch nach Deutsch รผbersetzen, erst Englisch auswรคhlen dann wieder Deutsch!

Google Android Playstore Download Button fรผr Team IT Security



๐Ÿ“š CVE-2020-25597


๐Ÿ’ก Newskategorie: Sicherheitslรผcken
๐Ÿ”— Quelle: web.nvd.nist.gov

An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There is mishandling of the constraint that once-valid event channels may not turn invalid. Logic in the handling of event channel operations in Xen assumes that an event channel, once valid, will not become invalid over the life time of a guest. However, operations like the resetting of all event channels may involve decreasing one of the bounds checked when determining validity. This may lead to bug checks triggering, crashing the host. An unprivileged guest may be able to crash Xen, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) for the entire system. All Xen versions from 4.4 onwards are vulnerable. Xen versions 4.3 and earlier are not vulnerable. Only systems with untrusted guests permitted to create more than the default number of event channels are vulnerable. This number depends on the architecture and type of guest. For 32-bit x86 PV guests, this is 1023; for 64-bit x86 PV guests, and for all ARM guests, this number is 4095. Systems where untrusted guests are limited to fewer than this number are not vulnerable. Note that xl and libxl limit max_event_channels to 1023 by default, so systems using exclusively xl, libvirt+libxl, or their own toolstack based on libxl, and not explicitly setting max_event_channels, are not vulnerable. ...



๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Advisory - Sourcetree - CVE-2017-14592 CVE-2017-14593 CVE-2017-14592 CVE-2017-17831


๐Ÿ“ˆ 4.73 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Mehrere Sicherheitslรผcken [CVE-2022-38023, CVE-2022-37966, CVE-2022-37967, CVE-2022-45141] in Samba


๐Ÿ“ˆ 4.73 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Reverse engineering Airspan AirSpot - Analysis of CVE-2022-36266, CVE-2022-36267, CVE-2022-36264, and CVE-2022-36265


๐Ÿ“ˆ 4.73 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: CVE-2016-9277,CVE-2016-9966,CVE-2016-9967: Possible Privilege Escalation in telecom


๐Ÿ“ˆ 3.55 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: CVE-2016-9277,CVE-2016-9966,CVE-2016-9967: Possible Privilege Escalation in telecom


๐Ÿ“ˆ 3.55 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Multiple Security Updates Affecting TCP/IP:โ€ฏ CVE-2021-24074, CVE-2021-24094, and CVE-2021-24086


๐Ÿ“ˆ 3.55 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ CVE-2021-42133, CVE-2022-36971, & CVE-2022-36981: Multiple Ivanti Avalanche Code Execution Bugs


๐Ÿ“ˆ 3.55 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Multiple Security Updates Affecting TCP/IP:โ€ฏ CVE-2021-24074, CVE-2021-24094, and CVE-2021-24086


๐Ÿ“ˆ 3.55 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Multiple Security Updates Affecting TCP/IP:โ€ฏ CVE-2021-24074, CVE-2021-24094, and CVE-2021-24086


๐Ÿ“ˆ 3.55 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Microsoft patches three exploited zero-days (CVE-2023-21715, CVE-2023-23376, CVE-2023-21823)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 3.55 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: CVE-2015-7944, CVE-2015-7945 - Ganeti Security Advisory (DoS, Unauthenticated Info Leak)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Qualys Security Advisory - Roaming through the OpenSSH client: CVE-2016-0777 and CVE-2016-0778


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ [papers] - Roaming Through the OpenSSH Client: CVE-2016-0777 and CVE-2016-0778


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: [CVE-2016-0602, CVE-2016-0603] Executable installers are vulnerable^WEVIL (case 24): Oracle Java 6/7/8 SE and VirtualBox


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Re: [FD] [CVE-2016-0602, CVE-2016-0603] Executable installers are vulnerable^WEVIL (case 24): Oracle Java 6/7/8 SE and VirtualBox


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: CVE-2015-0061 and CVE-2015-0063 (MS16-009/MS16-011)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: [CVE-2016-1014, CVE-2016-4247] Executable installers are vulnerable^WEVIL (case 35): Adobe's Flash Player (un)installers


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: MySQL / MariaDB / PerconaDB - Root Privilege Escalation Exploit ( CVE-2016-6664 / CVE-2016-5617 )


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: PHPMailer < 5.2.20 Remote Code Execution PoC 0day Exploit (CVE-2016-10045) (Bypass of the CVE-2016-1033 patch)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: CVE-2015-7944, CVE-2015-7945 - Ganeti Security Advisory (DoS, Unauthenticated Info Leak)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Qualys Security Advisory - Roaming through the OpenSSH client: CVE-2016-0777 and CVE-2016-0778


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ [papers] - Roaming Through the OpenSSH Client: CVE-2016-0777 and CVE-2016-0778


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: [CVE-2016-0602, CVE-2016-0603] Executable installers are vulnerable^WEVIL (case 24): Oracle Java 6/7/8 SE and VirtualBox


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Re: [FD] [CVE-2016-0602, CVE-2016-0603] Executable installers are vulnerable^WEVIL (case 24): Oracle Java 6/7/8 SE and VirtualBox


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: CVE-2015-0061 and CVE-2015-0063 (MS16-009/MS16-011)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: [CVE-2016-1014, CVE-2016-4247] Executable installers are vulnerable^WEVIL (case 35): Adobe's Flash Player (un)installers


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: MySQL / MariaDB / PerconaDB - Root Privilege Escalation Exploit ( CVE-2016-6664 / CVE-2016-5617 )


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: PHPMailer < 5.2.20 Remote Code Execution PoC 0day Exploit (CVE-2016-10045) (Bypass of the CVE-2016-1033 patch)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Multiple Vulnerabilities in ASUS Routers [CVE-2017-5891 and CVE-2017-5892]


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Is CVE-2017-0199 the new CVE-2012-0158?


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Datto Windows Agent 1.0.5.0 Remote Command Execution [CVE-2017-16673][CVE-2017-16674]


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Advisory - Bamboo - CVE-2017-14589 CVE-2017-14590


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: Multiple vulnerabilities in TP-Link products(CVE-2017-15613 to CVE-2017-15637)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Bugtraq: [CVE-2018-3667, CVE-2018-3668] Escalation of priviilege via executable installer of Intel Processor Diagnostic Tool


๐Ÿ“ˆ 2.36 Punkte











matomo