Ausnahme gefangen: SSL certificate problem: certificate is not yet valid ๐Ÿ“Œ EU's Vestager Appeals Court Veto of $15 Billion Apple Tax Order

๐Ÿ  Team IT Security News

TSecurity.de ist eine Online-Plattform, die sich auf die Bereitstellung von Informationen,alle 15 Minuten neuste Nachrichten, Bildungsressourcen und Dienstleistungen rund um das Thema IT-Sicherheit spezialisiert hat.
Ob es sich um aktuelle Nachrichten, Fachartikel, Blogbeitrรคge, Webinare, Tutorials, oder Tipps & Tricks handelt, TSecurity.de bietet seinen Nutzern einen umfassenden รœberblick รผber die wichtigsten Aspekte der IT-Sicherheit in einer sich stรคndig verรคndernden digitalen Welt.

16.12.2023 - TIP: Wer den Cookie Consent Banner akzeptiert, kann z.B. von Englisch nach Deutsch รผbersetzen, erst Englisch auswรคhlen dann wieder Deutsch!

Google Android Playstore Download Button fรผr Team IT Security



๐Ÿ“š EU's Vestager Appeals Court Veto of $15 Billion Apple Tax Order


๐Ÿ’ก Newskategorie: IT Security Nachrichten
๐Ÿ”— Quelle: apple.slashdot.org

EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager on Friday appealed a court ruling dismissing her order to iPhone maker Apple to pay 13 billion euros ($15 billion) in Irish back taxes, a landmark case in the European Commission's crackdown against sweetheart tax deals. From a report: The Luxembourg-based General Court in July scrapped the Commission's 2016 ruling, saying that EU competition enforcers had not met the requisite legal standard to show that Apple had enjoyed an unfair advantage. Vestager said the case was important, a sign that her drive to get multinationals pay their fair share of taxes would continue unabated. "The General Court judgment raises important legal issues that are of relevance to the Commission in its application of State aid rules to tax planning cases," she said in a statement.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

...



๐Ÿ“Œ EU's Vestager Appeals Court Veto of $15 Billion Apple Tax Order


๐Ÿ“ˆ 100.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Apple Takes On EU's Vestager In Record $14 Billion Tax Fight


๐Ÿ“ˆ 43.17 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Maryland Appeals Court Upholds Lower Court Stingray Ruling (April 6, 2016)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 37.04 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Maryland Appeals Court Upholds Lower Court Stingray Ruling (April 6, 2016)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 37.04 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Corporate Tax: Meaning, Corporate Tax Rate, Corporate Tax Rebates


๐Ÿ“ˆ 35.18 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ U.S. court bars Apple Watch imports while Apple appeals ITC ban


๐Ÿ“ˆ 31.46 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Apple asks US appeals court to reverse Apple Watch import ban


๐Ÿ“ˆ 31.46 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Apple Appeals EU Tax Ruling, Says It Was a 'Convenient Target'


๐Ÿ“ˆ 31.41 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Apple Appeals EU Tax Ruling, Says It Was a 'Convenient Target'


๐Ÿ“ˆ 31.41 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Vestager Seeks Patents Overhaul Amid Court Fights Over Cars


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.87 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Google Spared $1.3 Billion Tax Bill With Victory In French Court


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.66 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Apple wins as U.S. appeals court affirms decision to toss $308.5 million jury verdict


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.39 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Apple Music trademark application blocked by U.S. appeals court


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.39 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Apple hails โ€˜resounding victoryโ€™ as appeals court affirms sanctity of walled garden


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.39 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ U.S. appeals court dismisses child labor case against Apple, other tech companies


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.39 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Appeals Court Reinstates Apple's $120 Million Slide-To-Unlock Patent Win Over Samsung


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.39 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ US Appeals Court Revives Antitrust Lawsuit Against Apple


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.39 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Appeals Court Reinstates Apple's $120 Million Slide-To-Unlock Patent Win Over Samsung


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.39 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ US Appeals Court Revives Antitrust Lawsuit Against Apple


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.39 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Epic Strikes Back At Apple's iOS 'Security' Defense In Appeals Court


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.39 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Federal appeals court rules in Appleโ€™s favor in Epic Games lawsuit


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.39 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Apple Watch Import Ban Temporarily Stopped By US Appeals Court


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.39 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Federal Appeals Court Says Warrant Not Needed for Stingray Use (April 14, 2016)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.33 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Federal Appeals Court Says No Warrant Needed for Stingray Use (May 31, 2016)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.33 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ US Appeals Court Sides with Microsoft in Ireland Server Case (July 14, 2016)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.33 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Microsoft scores privacy win after appeals court split vote


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.33 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Federal Appeals Court Says Warrant Not Needed for Stingray Use (April 14, 2016)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.33 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Federal Appeals Court Says No Warrant Needed for Stingray Use (May 31, 2016)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.33 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ US Appeals Court Sides with Microsoft in Ireland Server Case (July 14, 2016)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.33 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Microsoft scores privacy win after appeals court split vote


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.33 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ No, the cops can't get a search warrant to just seize all devices in sight โ€“ US appeals court


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.33 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ US appeals court curbs police power to seize cellphones


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.33 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Russian Spy Agency Hits Back At Telegram In Appeals Court


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.33 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Forcing iPhone unlock violates Fifth Amendment, says Court of Appeals


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.33 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Preview of the International Criminal Court Appeals Judgment on Al-Bashir and Head of State Immunity


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.33 Punkte











matomo