Ausnahme gefangen: SSL certificate problem: certificate is not yet valid ๐Ÿ“Œ Facebook Refers Its Trump Ban To Its 'Supreme Court'

๐Ÿ  Team IT Security News

TSecurity.de ist eine Online-Plattform, die sich auf die Bereitstellung von Informationen,alle 15 Minuten neuste Nachrichten, Bildungsressourcen und Dienstleistungen rund um das Thema IT-Sicherheit spezialisiert hat.
Ob es sich um aktuelle Nachrichten, Fachartikel, Blogbeitrรคge, Webinare, Tutorials, oder Tipps & Tricks handelt, TSecurity.de bietet seinen Nutzern einen umfassenden รœberblick รผber die wichtigsten Aspekte der IT-Sicherheit in einer sich stรคndig verรคndernden digitalen Welt.

16.12.2023 - TIP: Wer den Cookie Consent Banner akzeptiert, kann z.B. von Englisch nach Deutsch รผbersetzen, erst Englisch auswรคhlen dann wieder Deutsch!

Google Android Playstore Download Button fรผr Team IT Security



๐Ÿ“š Facebook Refers Its Trump Ban To Its 'Supreme Court'


๐Ÿ’ก Newskategorie: IT Security Nachrichten
๐Ÿ”— Quelle: tech.slashdot.org

While NBC News reported on Tuesday that Facebook "has no plan in place to lift the indefinite suspension on President Donald Trump's Facebook account," there was a new twist two days later. "Facebook on Thursday announced that it will refer its decision to indefinitely suspend the account of former President Donald Trump to its newly instituted Oversight Board," reports CNBC: The independent body, which has been described as Facebook's "Supreme Court," will review the decision to suspend Trump and make a binding decision on whether the account will be reinstated. Until a decision is made, Trump's account will remain suspended, the company said in a blog post. The board will begin accepting public comments on the case next week, it said in a tweet. It will have up to 90 days to make its decision, but its members have committed to move as quickly as possible, a spokesman for the body told CNBC. A decision can't be overruled by CEO Mark Zuckerberg or other executives. "We believe our decision was necessary and right..." Facebook's VP of Global Affairs wrote on their blog, adding "We look forward to receiving the board's decision โ€” and we hope, given the clear justification for our actions on January 7, that it will uphold the choices we made..." Some said that Facebook should have banned President Trump long ago, and that the violence on the Capitol was itself a product of social media; others that it was an unacceptable display of unaccountable corporate power over political speech. We have taken the view that in open democracies people have a right to hear what their politicians are saying โ€” the good, the bad and the ugly โ€” so that they can be held to account. But it has never meant that politicians can say whatever they like. They remain subject to our policies banning the use of our platform to incite violence. It is these policies that were enforced when we took the decision to suspend President Trump's access. Whether you believe the decision was justified or not, many people are understandably uncomfortable with the idea that tech companies have the power to ban elected leaders. Many argue private companies like Facebook shouldn't be making these big decisions on their own. We agree... It would be better if these decisions were made according to frameworks agreed by democratically accountable lawmakers. But in the absence of such laws, there are decisions that we cannot duck. This is why we established the Oversight Board. It is the first body of its kind in the world: an expert-led independent organization with the power to impose binding decisions on a private social media company. Its decision will be available at the board's website when it is issued.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

...



๐Ÿ“Œ Facebook Refers Its Trump Ban To Its 'Supreme Court'


๐Ÿ“ˆ 81.04 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Why Supreme Court Travel Ban Ruling Is No Victory for Trump


๐Ÿ“ˆ 40.34 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Partially Revives Travel Ban, Will Hear Appeal


๐Ÿ“ˆ 33.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Through the Looking Glass, Darkly: The Supreme Courtโ€™s Muslim Travel Ban Decision


๐Ÿ“ˆ 33.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Upholds Cellphone Robocall Ban


๐Ÿ“ˆ 33.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Moves Toward Digital With Online Court Filings


๐Ÿ“ˆ 32.99 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ UK Supreme Court considers whether spy court should be immune to legal probes


๐Ÿ“ˆ 32.99 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ UK Supreme Court considers whether spy court should be immune to legal probes


๐Ÿ“ˆ 32.99 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court says secret UK spy court's judgments can be overruled after all


๐Ÿ“ˆ 32.99 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Asked to Give Access to Secretive Courtโ€™s Work


๐Ÿ“ˆ 32.99 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Facebook Plans Launch of Its Own 'Supreme Court' For Handling Takedown Appeals


๐Ÿ“ˆ 31.45 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court on Trumpโ€™s Finances: Glass Three Quarters Full for Rule of Law


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.43 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Courtโ€™s Trump v. Mazars Ruling Gave Attorney-Client Privilege a Boost in Congress


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.43 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ US Supreme Court hebt Urteil zu von Trump geblockten Twitter-Accounts aufโ€‹


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.43 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Streit รผber Geheimdokumente: Trump schaltet Supreme Court ein


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.43 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.43 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Trump Administration Tells Supreme Court To Wipe Out Decision Upholding Net Neutrality


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.43 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Trump Asks Supreme Court To Let Him Block Critics on Twitter


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.43 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Polymorphic Refers to a Malwareโ€™s Ability to Change


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.52 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Richard Stallman refers to himself as "Dr. Richard Stallman" even though he's never earned a Doctorate? Woah, boy.


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.52 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Microsoft now refers to Windows 11 24H2 as the 2024 Update and it only means one thing


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.52 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Edge for Android now refers to new and legacy versions of Microsoft Edge


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.52 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Fix: Desktop Refers to a Location That Is Unavailable


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.52 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Textbook refers to Linux as an Operating System


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.52 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ React Type Error: not assignable LegacyRef<V> && 'V' refers to a value, did you mean 'typeof V'?


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.52 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ The Facebook Oversight Boardโ€™s Trump Ban Decision Is About More Than Trump


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.4 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court rejects lawsuit claiming Facebook provided terrorist forum support


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.45 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ US Supreme Court Rebuffs Facebook Appeal In User Tracking Lawsuit


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.45 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Says Facebook Text Alerts Aren't Illegal Robocalls


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.45 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Rejects Ohio Man's Bid To Sue Police Over Arrest of Facebook Parody


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.45 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ US govt can't stop Microsoft taking its Irish email seizure fight to the Supreme Court


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.27 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ US govt can't stop Microsoft taking its Irish email seizure fight to the Supreme Court


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.27 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Canadian Supreme Courtโ€™s Chance to Reform Its Military Justice System


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.27 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Canadian Supreme Courtโ€™s Chance to Reform Its Military Justice System


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.27 Punkte











matomo