๐ Distro differences?
๐ก Newskategorie: Linux Tipps
๐ Quelle: reddit.com
I see talk about the positives of any distro all the time, but the drawbacks arn't talked about all that much. So what I want to know is what are the weaknesses and negatives to the different distros. Which ones are just the softwhere choices fault and which ones are more of an inbuilt unchangeable to that distro (like package managers and updates).
Particularly I'm wondering whether theres any substance to the claims that arch is better, or to the claims that ubuntu and ubuntu based distros are the worst (/on the bad side of the scale).
If someone picked up arch, then installed programs typically used on say ubuntu (or one of the distros based on it), would the same cons as ubuntu still exist? If so which programs are the problems, or how do you find which programs are problems.
[link] [comments] ...