Ausnahme gefangen: SSL certificate problem: certificate is not yet valid ๐Ÿ“Œ Some Firefox performance benchmarks through snap, flatpak and the tarball version

๐Ÿ  Team IT Security News

TSecurity.de ist eine Online-Plattform, die sich auf die Bereitstellung von Informationen,alle 15 Minuten neuste Nachrichten, Bildungsressourcen und Dienstleistungen rund um das Thema IT-Sicherheit spezialisiert hat.
Ob es sich um aktuelle Nachrichten, Fachartikel, Blogbeitrรคge, Webinare, Tutorials, oder Tipps & Tricks handelt, TSecurity.de bietet seinen Nutzern einen umfassenden รœberblick รผber die wichtigsten Aspekte der IT-Sicherheit in einer sich stรคndig verรคndernden digitalen Welt.

16.12.2023 - TIP: Wer den Cookie Consent Banner akzeptiert, kann z.B. von Englisch nach Deutsch รผbersetzen, erst Englisch auswรคhlen dann wieder Deutsch!

Google Android Playstore Download Button fรผr Team IT Security



๐Ÿ“š Some Firefox performance benchmarks through snap, flatpak and the tarball version


๐Ÿ’ก Newskategorie: Linux Tipps
๐Ÿ”— Quelle: reddit.com

So, I was bored and did some benchmarks to test performance through different package systems.

All 3 Firefox instances where without any extensions on a private window. Every set of benchmarks is the median of 10 runs discarding the worse and best result.

System: Ubuntu 22.04 Firefox version: 100.x

โ€‹

Results

In case someone is interested in run their own against other browser or whatever:

submitted by /u/Background-Donut840
[link] [comments] ...



๐Ÿ“Œ Some Firefox performance benchmarks through snap, flatpak and the tarball version


๐Ÿ“ˆ 96.84 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Performance Comparison between different packaging methods of Firefox (Snap, Flatpak, RPM)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 36.57 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ What Is Flatpak And How To Install Flatpak Apps On Ubuntu And Other Linux


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.58 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Comparison of Firefox isolated in Flatpak vs Snap


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.27 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Linux Mint 20 to not ship with snap and do nothing on "apt install Chromium" that otherwise installs a snap version of Chromium on Ubuntu.


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.24 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Raptor Talos II POWER9 Benchmarks Against AMD Threadripper & Intel Core i9 // High Performance Libre Linux System Benchmarks


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.12 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ 62 Benchmarks, 12 Systems, 4 Compilers: Our Most Extensive Benchmarks Yet Of GCC vs. Clang Performance


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.12 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ What are Flatpak and Snap and why are they so important to Linux?


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.98 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Minor changes to kernel tarball releases (kernel.org)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.04 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ What does "tarball" mean? Where does it originate from?


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.04 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ tar-fs up to 1.16.1 Tarball directory traversal


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.04 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ node-tar up to 4.4.1 Tarball directory traversal


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.04 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ UNIX / Linux PGP TarBall File Signature Keys Verification


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.04 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Alpine apk-tools up to 2.12.4 Tarball Parser buffer overflow


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.04 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ CVE-2022-23522 | MindsDB prior 22.11.4.3 Tarball shutil.unpack_archive path traversal (GHSA-7x45-phmr-9wqp)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.04 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ CVE-2013-7325 | devscripts up to 2.13.18 Tarball code injection (Nessus ID 71802 / BID-64656)


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.04 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ How To Create a Tarball in Linux


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.04 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Minor changes to kernel tarball releases


๐Ÿ“ˆ 27.04 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Snap Flatpak and Appimage, package formats compared


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ A fundamental difference between Snap and Flatpak


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ OnlyOffice Flatpak and Snap versions are here.


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ KDE Software Store to Soon Offer Downloads in Snap, Flatpak and AppImage Formats


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ KDE Software Store to Soon Offer Downloads in Snap, Flatpak and AppImage Formats


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ LibreOffice 5.4 Office Suite Is Now Available as Flatpak and Snap Packages


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ I made a BASH script that removes Snap from an Ubuntu system and replaces it with Flatpak.


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ FOSDEM โ€˜23 - I was wrong about Flatpak, AppImage, and Snap


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Why Snap and Flatpak make Linux a better OS for the average user


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ KDE Plasma's Discover Package Manager Gets Better Snap and Flatpak Support


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Snap, Flatpak, and AppImage fragmentation


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Can we have an objective, non-FUD, user-centric comparison/discussion of Snap and Flatpak for 2021?


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Canonical should ditch Snap, embrace Flatpak and improve APT


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Universal Package Managers for Linux: Snap, Flatpak, and AppImage


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Why people like Flatpak, Snap and AppImage?


๐Ÿ“ˆ 26.19 Punkte











matomo