Ausnahme gefangen: SSL certificate problem: certificate is not yet valid ๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Rejects Apple's Bid To Continue Fighting Over Two Qualcomm Patents

๐Ÿ  Team IT Security News

TSecurity.de ist eine Online-Plattform, die sich auf die Bereitstellung von Informationen,alle 15 Minuten neuste Nachrichten, Bildungsressourcen und Dienstleistungen rund um das Thema IT-Sicherheit spezialisiert hat.
Ob es sich um aktuelle Nachrichten, Fachartikel, Blogbeitrรคge, Webinare, Tutorials, oder Tipps & Tricks handelt, TSecurity.de bietet seinen Nutzern einen umfassenden รœberblick รผber die wichtigsten Aspekte der IT-Sicherheit in einer sich stรคndig verรคndernden digitalen Welt.

16.12.2023 - TIP: Wer den Cookie Consent Banner akzeptiert, kann z.B. von Englisch nach Deutsch รผbersetzen, erst Englisch auswรคhlen dann wieder Deutsch!

Google Android Playstore Download Button fรผr Team IT Security



๐Ÿ“š Supreme Court Rejects Apple's Bid To Continue Fighting Over Two Qualcomm Patents


๐Ÿ’ก Newskategorie: IT Security Nachrichten
๐Ÿ”— Quelle: yro.slashdot.org

The Supreme Court declined Apple's bid for a hearing over two Qualcomm patents (US Patent No. 7,844,037 and US Patent No. 8,683,362) that were part of lawsuits filed in 2017, claiming infringement by Apple's iPhones, iPads, and Apple Watches. The Verge reports: Reuters points out that Apple and Qualcomm's 2019 settlement of a worldwide legal battle over patents largely ended the squabbling in favor of a six-year licensing agreement but allowed a case in front of the Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board to continue. There, Apple argued the two patents should be invalid, but the board ruled in Qualcomm's favor. Last April, the Federal Circuit court rejected Apple's request for an appeal based on the 2019 settlement covering thousands of patents, including those two. At the time, Apple argued that its royalty payments and risk of being sued again were reasons for a hearing. In its appeal to the Supreme Court (pdf), Apple argued that Qualcomm might use the patents in a lawsuit again once the license expires in 2025 or in 2027 if it's extended. The Department of Justice under the Biden administration submitted an amicus brief rejecting those arguments in May and asked the Supreme Court to deny Apple's request. Now that it has, we'll probably have to wait until that license agreement eventually expires to know what will happen next.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

...



๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Rejects Apple's Bid To Continue Fighting Over Two Qualcomm Patents


๐Ÿ“ˆ 112.31 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Apple Loses Second Bid To Challenge Qualcomm Patents At US Supreme Court


๐Ÿ“ˆ 54.41 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Rejects Ohio Man's Bid To Sue Police Over Arrest of Facebook Parody


๐Ÿ“ˆ 53.31 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Rejects Computer Scientist's Lawsuit Over AI-Generated Inventions


๐Ÿ“ˆ 46.18 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Rejects Apple Appeal In Patent Fight With VirnetX


๐Ÿ“ˆ 42.69 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Rejects Apple-Epic Games Legal Battle


๐Ÿ“ˆ 42.69 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court rejects lawsuit claiming Facebook provided terrorist forum support


๐Ÿ“ˆ 40.63 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Rejects Industry Challenge of 2015 Net Neutrality Rules


๐Ÿ“ˆ 40.63 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ US Supreme Court Rejects Amazon Warehouse Worker Wage Appeal


๐Ÿ“ˆ 40.63 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Declines To Consider Medical Diagnostic Patents


๐Ÿ“ˆ 38.57 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ The Supreme Court Fight Over Microsoft's Foreign Servers Is Over


๐Ÿ“ˆ 34.36 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ UK Supreme Court considers whether spy court should be immune to legal probes


๐Ÿ“ˆ 32.97 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ UK Supreme Court considers whether spy court should be immune to legal probes


๐Ÿ“ˆ 32.97 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court says secret UK spy court's judgments can be overruled after all


๐Ÿ“ˆ 32.97 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Moves Toward Digital With Online Court Filings


๐Ÿ“ˆ 32.97 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Asked to Give Access to Secretive Courtโ€™s Work


๐Ÿ“ˆ 32.97 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ US Supreme Court lehnt Antrag von Apple im Streit mit Qualcomm ab


๐Ÿ“ˆ 31.98 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ U.S. Supreme Court refuses to consider Appleโ€™s appeal over advertising alternative App Store payment options


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.88 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ IBM Takes Airbnb To Court Over Historic Patents


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.56 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Vestager Seeks Patents Overhaul Amid Court Fights Over Cars


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.56 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Revives LinkedIn Bid To Shield Personal Data


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.39 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Snubs Wikipedia Bid To Challenge NSA Surveillance


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.39 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Understanding the Two Mazars Subpoena Cases Before the Supreme Court


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.35 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Two Supreme Court Cases Could โ€œBreak the Internetโ€: What Role Should Free Speech Play?


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.35 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Two Supreme Court Cases Could Shape the Future of AI and Content Moderation


๐Ÿ“ˆ 30.35 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Italy Court Rejects Google's Appeal Against Watchdog Fine, Accepts Apple's One


๐Ÿ“ˆ 29.14 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Kim Dotcom Takes Fight with US Authorities over Seized Millions to Supreme Court


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.81 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Telegram Loses Supreme Court Appeal In Russia, Must Hand Over Encryption Keys


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.81 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court Won't Hear a Lawsuit Over Defamatory Yelp Reviews


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.81 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Illinois Supreme Court Rules Against Six Flags in Lawsuit Over Fingerprint Scans, Says Actual Harm Unnecessary For Biometric Case


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.81 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Supreme Court to Hear Dispute over Census Citizenship Question


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.81 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Principle Over Pretext: The Supreme Court Isnโ€™t Buying What Wilbur Ross Is Selling


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.81 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Comcast Wins Supreme Court Case Over Interpretation of Civil Rights Law


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.81 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ US Supreme Court rules for Google over Oracle


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.81 Punkte

๐Ÿ“Œ Florida Brings Battle Over Social Media Regulation To the Supreme Court


๐Ÿ“ˆ 28.81 Punkte











matomo