🔧 Sharing components Micro Frontends

. 𝙎𝙩𝙚𝙥𝙨:
     1. Create a separate repository for the component library.
     2. Develop and test the components.
     3. Publish the library to a package registry.
     4. Install the library in each microservice project.
.𝘼𝙙𝙫𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙜𝙚𝙨:
     - Centralized management of components.
     - Easy updates and versioning.
.𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗱𝘃𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗲𝘀:
     - Requires proper version management.
     - All microservices need to be updated to use the latest version.

. 𝙎𝙩𝙚𝙥𝙨:
     1. Set up a monorepo with Nx or Lerna.
     2. Create shared component libraries within the monorepo.
     3. Import and use the shared components in each microservice.
.𝘼𝙙𝙫𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙜𝙚𝙨:
     - Simplifies code sharing and dependency management.
     - Easier refactoring and consistency across microservices.
.𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗱𝘃𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗲𝘀:
     - Monorepo can become complex to manage as it grows.
     - Requires a robust CI/CD pipeline.

. 𝙎𝙩𝙚𝙥𝙨:
     1. Create a repository for shared components.
     2. Add the shared repository as a submodule to each microservice repository.
     3. Use the shared components in the microservices.
.𝘼𝙙𝙫𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙜𝙚𝙨:
     - Directly integrates with Git.
     - Updates in the shared repository can be pulled into each microservice.
.𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗱𝘃𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗲𝘀:
     - Managing submodule updates can be cumbersome.
     - Not as seamless as using a package registry.

. 𝙎𝙩𝙚𝙥𝙨:
     1. Create a micro-frontend architecture where each microservice can publish its UI components.
     2. Use module federation (e.g., Webpack 5 Module Federation) to dynamically import components.
.𝘼𝙙𝙫𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙜𝙚𝙨:
     - Promotes independent deployment.
     - Components can be updated independently.
.𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗱𝘃𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗲𝘀:
     - Requires a more complex setup and configuration.
     - Potential for increased latency and load times.