Does anyone actually daily drive Arch Linux for serious, professional programming? Looking for reassurance before jumping to Fedora

Hey everyone,
I’ve been completely stuck in this distro crisis for a week now, and I need some perspective.
I’ve used Arch for years. Almost zero issues. Honestly, I felt immortal. But over the past month, I’ve started caring a lot more about the concept of stability. It’s true that Arch never actually broke on me, but I’ve always had to stay hyper-vigilant—checking dependencies, making sure specific packages didn't have known bugs, and never having a 100% guarantee that a system update wouldn’t break my environment.
I’m starting to realize that what I need isn’t necessarily a "more stable" system, but a more reassuring one. Knowing that if I don’t update Arch for 3 months (unlikely, but that was my Windows workflow), I might face massive breakage, just doesn't give me peace of mind anymore. That’s why I’ve been thinking about Fedora: major updates every 6 months, and I can just chill in between.
The catch is... I’ve taken care of my Arch install like it was my own child. Making this sudden jump terrifies me.
I’d love to know: is anyone here actually using Arch as their main daily driver for serious, professional programming work and studying? If so, have you run into any major issues? How do you maintain your system? Can Btrfs with snapshots really save you from a bad update? Is keeping a separate ⁠/home⁠ partition and just reinstalling Arch on ⁠/⁠ during an emergency actually reliable? And finally, how often do you update?
What do you guys think?