CVE-2016-2183 — CVE & Security Advisory Radar

🎯 CVE-2016-2183 HIGH 7.5 🔥 EPSS 95.7% 🧪 PoC 🇪🇺 EUVD

📄 .md Alle CVEs anzeigen ✕

CVE-2016-2183 | The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack.

The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack.

Klassifikation & Betroffenheit:

n/a n/a n/aredhat jboss_enterprise_application_platform 6.0.0redhat jboss_enterprise_web_server 1.0.0redhat jboss_enterprise_web_server 2.0.0redhat jboss_web_server 3.0redhat enterprise_linux 5.0redhat enterprise_linux 6.0redhat enterprise_linux 7.0

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') 🎯 Medium

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.

🛡️ Empfohlene Mitigation: Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.

Vollständige Definition bei MITRE ➔

⚔️ Typische Angriffsmuster (CAPEC):

CAPEC-35 · Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executab… (Very High) CAPEC-77 · Manipulating User-Controlled Variables (Very High) CAPEC-242 · Code Injection (High)

🎯 ATT&CK-Techniken (Kill-Chain-Verhalten):

T1027.006 · Obfuscated Files or Information: H… T1027.009 · Obfuscated Files or Information: E… T1564.009 · Hide Artifacts: Resource Forking

🧩 Ähnliche Schwachstellen (Hersteller/Klasse/Score-Band):

CVE-2026-36748 9.0 CVE-2026-30282 9.0 CVE-2025-32991 9.0 CVE-2025-69634 9.0 CVE-2025-68723 9.0

🧪 Exploit-Evidenz:

🐙 ZakyHermawan/Simple-Sweet32

🩹 Patch verfügbar (OSV):

🩹 848d650dade802c835b4b3a1e29c7581e79494ed (Commit) 🩹 0ad4bbd94af535d9b70f64fff28652f23b05c403 (Commit)

📚 Referenzen & Quellen:

🇪🇺 Original-Eintrag (ENISA EUVD) 🇺🇸 NVD-Eintrag

Ausnutzungs-Zeitleiste:

Reserviert 2016

Veröffentlicht 09/2016

Heute 07.09.

CVSS-Vektor-Analyse: 7.5

AV · Angriffsvektor Netzwerk

AC · Komplexität Gering

PR · Privilegien Keine

UI · Interaktion Keine

S · Scope Unverändert

C · Vertraulichkeit Hoch

I · Integrität Keine

A · Verfügbarkeit Keine

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Veröffentlicht:01.09.2016

Aktualisiert:17.06.2026 00:43

Assigner (CNA):redhat

EUVD-ID:EUVD-2016-3268

Quellen: 🇪🇺 EUVD-Datenbank (ENISA) + 🇺🇸 NVD-Anreicherung · 24-h-Cache

CWE-94: Code Injection ✓ Offizieller Patch / Advisory verfügbar

💡 Gegenmaßnahme: Sicherheits-Update des Herstellers zeitnah einspielen und Netzwerksegmentierung prüfen.

Tier	2026-08-29	2026-09-06
≥90 %	4	0
≥50 %	4	0
≥10 %	3	0
<10 %	304	300

7.5 HIGH

🇪🇺 EUVD

EPSS

95.7%

CVE-2016-2183 🌐 Netzwerk (Remote) 🔓 Keine Authentifizierung nötig

🧪 n/a

CVE-2016-2183 | The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack.

CWE-94: Code Injection ✓ Offizieller Patch / Advisory verfügbar

💡 Gegenmaßnahme: Sicherheits-Update des Herstellers zeitnah einspielen und Netzwerksegmentierung prüfen.

01.09.2016

🛡️ Details ➔

Zero-Day & Vulnerability Intelligence Hub