🛡️ tsecurity.de
Zur Startseite 🔖 Lesezeichen
🎯 CVE-2026-49414 HIGH 7.8 🔥 EPSS 11% 🇪🇺 EUVD
📄 .md Alle CVEs anzeigen ✕

CVE-2026-49414 | The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that bina

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen.

An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

Klassifikation & Betroffenheit:
FreeBSD FreeBSD 14.3-RELEASE <p15FreeBSD 15.0-RELEASE <p10FreeBSD 14.4-RELEASE <p6freebsd freebsd 14.3freebsd freebsd 14.4freebsd freebsd 15.0
Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer 🎯 High

The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

🛡️ Empfohlene Mitigation: Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow prot…
Vollständige Definition bei MITRE ➔
⚔️ Typische Angriffsmuster (CAPEC):
CAPEC-10 · Buffer Overflow via Environment Variable… (High) CAPEC-14 · Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Ove… (High) CAPEC-24 · Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow (High) CAPEC-42 · MIME Conversion (High) CAPEC-44 · Overflow Binary Resource File (Very High) CAPEC-45 · Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links (High) CAPEC-100 · Overflow Buffers (Very High) CAPEC-123 · Buffer Manipulation (Very High)
🧩 Ähnliche Schwachstellen (Hersteller/Klasse/Score-Band):
CVE-2024-8178 9.3 CVE-2024-45287 9.1 CVE-2026-49427 8.8 CVE-2026-49420 8.8 CVE-2026-49415 8.8
📚 Referenzen & Quellen:
🇪🇺 Original-Eintrag (ENISA EUVD) 🇺🇸 NVD-Eintrag
Ausnutzungs-Zeitleiste:
CVSS-Vektor-Analyse: 7.8
AV · Angriffsvektor Lokal
AC · Komplexität Gering
PR · Privilegien Gering
UI · Interaktion Keine
S · Scope Unverändert
C · Vertraulichkeit Hoch
I · Integrität Hoch
A · Verfügbarkeit Hoch
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Veröffentlicht:27.06.2026
Aktualisiert:01.07.2026 14:04
Assigner (CNA):freebsd
EUVD-ID:EUVD-2026-39966
Quellen: 🇪🇺 EUVD-Datenbank (ENISA) + 🇺🇸 NVD-Anreicherung · 24-h-Cache
CWE-119: Memory Corruption ✓ Offizieller Patch / Advisory verfügbar
💡 Gegenmaßnahme: Sicherheits-Update des Herstellers zeitnah einspielen und Netzwerksegmentierung prüfen.
🔴 Live Security Advisory & EPSS Exploit Radar

Zero-Day & Vulnerability Intelligence Hub

Echtzeit-Tracking mit EPSS Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeiten, Angriffsvektor-Decodern und KI-Patch-Anleitungen.

🟢 SSE Realtime Synchronisiert ⚡ REST API (JSON) 📡 Digest (RSS) 📡 RSS Feed
354k+ 🇪🇺 EUVD-Datenbank
0 🔴 Critical im Radar
0 ⚠️ CISA KEV
0 🔓 Aktiv ausgenutzt
0 🧪 PoC verfügbar
10 🆕 Neu im KEV (7 T)
📊 Historien-Charts — Criticals-Trend · Vendors · EPSS-Verteilung
🔴 Criticals pro Monat (12 M) 2025-09: 224 2025-10: 316 2025-11: 257 2025-12: 426 2026-01: 431 2026-02: 418 2026-03: 652 2026-04: 574 2026-05: 683 2026-06: 942 2026-07: 1333 2026-08: 1329 7.585 Criticals gesamt
🏢 Top-Vendor-Veröffentlichungen (6 M) Adobe Apple Google Linux Microsoft Oracle Corporation
● Adobe ● Apple ● Google ● Linux ● Microsoft ● Oracle
📈 EPSS-Verteilung (Messungen)
Tier2026-08-292026-09-06
≥90 %40
≥50 %40
≥10 %30
<10 %304300
📈 EPSS-Riser (7 Tage) CVE-2016-4776 ↑ 0.8 % CVE-2016-4773 ↑ 0.8 % CVE-2016-4774 ↑ 0.8 %
Frühindikator · FIRST.org
Datenquellen & Methodik: Primärquelle ist die EUVD der ENISA (laufender Datenbank-Sync, alle 15 Minuten), abgeglichen mit dem CISA-KEV-Katalog und der NVD — Detail-Dossiers reichern fehlende Felder live per NVD an — mit Fallback auf CIRCL vulnerability-lookup (EU/Non-Profit, aggregiert CVE-, GitHub- und OSV-Advisories). Der CISA-KEV-Katalog (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities, ~1.700 aktiv ausgenutzte Schwachstellen) wird bei jedem Sync vollständig neu geladen und kreuzreferenziert — filterbar über die KEV-Pille. CVSS 3.1 wird nach Ampel-Logik aus Verteidigersicht dekodiert; EPSS bezeichnet die 30-Tage-Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit (FIRST.org).
🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD 🇺🇸 NVD ⚠️ CISA KEV ⚡ EPSS
Ökosystem & Hersteller Bedrohungs-Matrix:
FreeBSD 1
Schweregrad & Status:
Hersteller (Datenbank-weit, 90.597 Einträge):
EPSS-Schwelle:
Quelle:
Schwachstellen-Kategorie (CWE):
🔍
7.8 HIGH
🇪🇺 EUVD
EPSS 11%
CVE-2026-49414 💻 Lokal 🔑 Geringe Nutzerrechte nötig
FreeBSD

CVE-2026-49414 | The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that bina

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where

CWE-119: Memory Corruption ✓ Offizieller Patch / Advisory verfügbar
💡 Gegenmaßnahme: Sicherheits-Update des Herstellers zeitnah einspielen und Netzwerksegmentierung prüfen.
27.06.2026
🛡️ Details ➔