CVE-2026-67298 — CVE & Security Advisory Radar

🎯 CVE-2026-67298 HIGH 8.7 🔥 EPSS 38% 🧪 PoC 🇪🇺 EUVD

📄 .md Alle CVEs anzeigen ✕

CVE-2026-67298 | FreeRDP versions 3.28.0 and earlier contain a heap buffer overflow in the server-side RAIL channel handler (rail_server_handle_messages() in channels/rail/server/rail_main.c). When processing a RAIL PDU header, the code subtracts RAIL_PDU_HEADER_LENGTH from the peer-controlled orderLength field without first verifying orderLength is at least the header length. For orderLength values 0..3 this causes an unsigned integer underflow to a very large size, which by

FreeRDP versions 3.28.0 and earlier contain a heap buffer overflow in the server-side RAIL channel handler (rail_server_handle_messages() in channels/rail/server/rail_main.c). When processing a RAIL PDU header, the code subtracts RAIL_PDU_HEADER_LENGTH from the peer-controlled orderLength field without first verifying orderLength is at least the header length. For orderLength values 0..3 this causes an unsigned integer underflow to a very large size, which bypasses the Stream_EnsureRemainingCapacity() capacity check (due to pointer arithmetic wraparound) and is then passed to WTSVirtualChannelRead(), resulting in an out-of-bounds heap write. A malicious or compromised RDP client can exploit this to corrupt the heap and crash the server. Fixed in FreeRDP 3.29.0.

Klassifikation & Betroffenheit:

FreeRDP FreeRDP 0 <3.29.0

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer 🎯 High

The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

🛡️ Empfohlene Mitigation: Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow prot…

Vollständige Definition bei MITRE ➔

⚔️ Typische Angriffsmuster (CAPEC):

CAPEC-10 · Buffer Overflow via Environment Variable… (High) CAPEC-14 · Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Ove… (High) CAPEC-24 · Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow (High) CAPEC-42 · MIME Conversion (High) CAPEC-44 · Overflow Binary Resource File (Very High) CAPEC-45 · Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links (High) CAPEC-100 · Overflow Buffers (Very High) CAPEC-123 · Buffer Manipulation (Very High)

🧩 Ähnliche Schwachstellen (Hersteller/Klasse/Score-Band):

CVE-2024-32659 9.8 CVE-2024-32658 9.8 CVE-2024-32459 9.8 CVE-2024-32458 9.8 CVE-2024-32041 9.8

🩹 Patch verfügbar (OSV):

🩹 46848765f2a1134f8652f8760eefb5e85d64a9b8 (Commit) 🩹 5370fb26fbf034ecd11d3026b6ad639b5fff493f (Commit)

📚 Referenzen & Quellen:

🇪🇺 Original-Eintrag (ENISA EUVD) 🇺🇸 NVD-Eintrag

Ausnutzungs-Zeitleiste:

Reserviert 2026

Veröffentlicht 08/2026

Heute 15.09.

CVSS-Vektor-Analyse: 8.7

AV · Angriffsvektor Netzwerk

AC · Komplexität Gering

PR · Privilegien Keine

UI · Interaktion Keine

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Veröffentlicht:01.08.2026

Aktualisiert:31.08.2026 20:25

Assigner (CNA):VulnCheck

EUVD-ID:EUVD-2026-51824

Quellen: 🇪🇺 EUVD-Datenbank (ENISA) + 🇺🇸 NVD-Anreicherung · 24-h-Cache

CWE-119: Memory Corruption ✓ Offizieller Patch / Advisory verfügbar

💡 Gegenmaßnahme: Sicherheits-Update des Herstellers zeitnah einspielen und Netzwerksegmentierung prüfen.

Tier	2026-08-29	2026-09-14
≥90 %	4	0
≥50 %	4	0
≥10 %	3	0
<10 %	304	300

8.7 HIGH

🇪🇺 EUVD

EPSS

38%

CVE-2026-67298 🌐 Netzwerk (Remote) 🔓 Keine Authentifizierung nötig

🧪 FreeRDP

CVE-2026-67298 | FreeRDP versions 3.28.0 and earlier contain a heap buffer overflow in the server-side RAIL channel handler (rail_server_handle_messages() in channels/rail/server/rail_main.c). When processing a RAIL PDU header, the code subtracts RAIL_PDU_HEADER_LENGTH from the peer-controlled orderLength field without first verifying orderLength is at least the header length. For orderLength values 0..3 this causes an unsigned integer underflow to a very large size, which by

CWE-119: Memory Corruption ✓ Offizieller Patch / Advisory verfügbar

💡 Gegenmaßnahme: Sicherheits-Update des Herstellers zeitnah einspielen und Netzwerksegmentierung prüfen.

01.08.2026

🛡️ Details ➔

Zero-Day & Vulnerability Intelligence Hub