I don't write programs myself. I realize that's unusual for someone seen as a hacker, but my methods have always been unusual.
I started off hacking using a web browser and Notepad, on dialup, on Windows 98. And some of them were my finest works.
When you think about it, this is a genuine meta-hack. When asked how to hack, most people are instructed to install Linux, learn how to code, and experiment with various hacking tools. Much like network administrators who are learning to safeguard their systems, they tend to obtain the same certifications and study many of the same publications.
This leads in behavior that is more comparable to jousting than hacking - a preset pattern of assault versus a predefined pattern of defense.
While I never coded, I learned to read code and understood how programmers thought, what assumptions they made, and what faults their common background caused them to make across very diverse systems. One example of this is writing access code with the assumption that if failure = no then access = yes.
On numerous systems, I discovered that just eliminating a username or password field resulted in access being given - because there had been no username or password failure, therefore access was granted.
Because my tactics were and still are unconventional, intrusion detection systems seldom detect them. They are not common assaults, thus they do not resemble them. I frequently make them up on the moment. That's why the question "teach me to hack" is so frustrating. How can I teach someone something that I haven't worked out for myself? I won't know till I arrive.
This question is an assumption in and of itself. It is assumed that in order to hack, you must know how to code. Hacking isn't only for computers. Throughout my day, I encounter the most complex, unusual, yet constructive answers to common situations. It is based on how you think. Even if you tried, you couldn't turn it off.
All I code is life.
SOCIAL SHARE CARD GENERATOR