Zum Hauptinhalt springen
••
IT NachrichtenBMW schafft still und leise den Diesel ab(03.10.2026 um 07:50 Uhr)
••••••
IT NachrichtenOktoberfest: Macht KI-Slop die Wiesn kaputt?(03.10.2026 um 07:47 Uhr)
••••
IT NachrichtenBMW schafft still und leise den Diesel ab(03.10.2026 um 07:50 Uhr)
••••••
IT NachrichtenOktoberfest: Macht KI-Slop die Wiesn kaputt?(03.10.2026 um 07:47 Uhr)
••
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

Week 4 Network Packet Tracing

The Interview Question That Exposes Your Networking Gaps You're in a Security Engineering interview. The interviewer shows you this diagram: ┌────────────┐ ┌───…

Beitrag
0
Seite
0
↗ Quelle (dev.to)
Social ReaktionenReagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!




The Interview Question That Exposes Your Networking Gaps



You're in a Security Engineering interview. The interviewer shows you this diagram:




┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐
│ Developer │ │ Office NAT │ │ Router │ │ File Server│
│ ├────────►│ ├────────►│ ├────────►│ │
│192.168.1.50│ │ WAN: 198.51.100.10 │ │ │ 20.0.0.100 │
└────────────┘ │ LAN: 192.168.1.1 │ 198.51.100.254 └────────────┘
└────────────┘ └────────────┘






Then they ask:




"The File Server has this iptables rule, but the Developer can't SSH in. Why?"




iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.50 --dport 22 -j ACCEPT




Can you answer this in 10 seconds?



If not, this article is for you. I've compiled 12 packet tracing problems that will permanently fix this gap in your knowledge.









⭐ Free Practice Problems on GitHub



I'm building an open-source collection of Security Engineering interview prep materials. If you find this useful:



👉 Star the repo on GitHub



Your stars help other security engineers discover these resources!









The Core Insight



Most candidates fail this question because they don't understand one fundamental rule:
























Device Type Changes Source/Dest IP?
NAT ✅ Yes
Router ❌ No
Firewall ❌ No (filtering only)


The File Server sees 198.51.100.10 (the NAT's public IP), not 192.168.1.50 (the Developer's private IP).



The fix:




iptables -A INPUT -s 198.51.100.10 --dport 22 -j ACCEPT






This pattern appears in technical assessments at top security companies. Let's master it.









🎯 12 Packet Tracing Problems



These problems are modeled after real technical assessments used by top security teams.



Instructions:




  • Time yourself: 30 minutes

  • Passing score: 85%

  • Answer key is at the bottom — no peeking!









Section A: Outbound NAT (SNAT/MASQUERADE)






Problem 1: Basic NAT






┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐
│ Client │ │ NAT Router │ │ Web Server │
│ ├────────►│ ├────────►│ │
│ 10.0.0.50 │ │ WAN: 203.0.113.5 │ 93.184.216.34
└────────────┘ │ LAN: 10.0.0.1│ └────────────┘
└────────────┘






Client sends HTTP request to Web Server.



At Point A (Client → NAT Router):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________



At Point B (NAT Router → Web Server):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________









Problem 2: NAT + Router Chain






┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐
│ Workstation│ │ NAT Router │ │ Router │ │ Server │
│ ├────────►│ ├────────►│ ├────────►│ │
│192.168.1.100 │ WAN: 74.125.1.1 │ │ │ 8.8.8.8 │
└────────────┘ │ LAN: 192.168.1.1 │ 74.125.1.254 └────────────┘
└────────────┘ └────────────┘






Workstation sends DNS query to 8.8.8.8.



At Point A (Workstation → NAT Router):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________



At Point B (NAT Router → Router):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________



At Point C (Router → Server):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________









Problem 3: Double NAT (Carrier-Grade NAT)






┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐
│ Laptop │ │ Home NAT │ │ ISP NAT │ │ Server │
│ ├────────►│ ├────────►│ (CGNAT) ├────────►│ │
│192.168.0.25│ │ WAN: 100.64.1.50 │ WAN: 52.1.2.3 │ 151.101.1.69
└────────────┘ │ LAN: 192.168.0.1 │ LAN: 100.64.0.1 └────────────┘
└────────────┘ └────────────┘






Laptop connects to Server (Double NAT scenario).



At Point A (Laptop → Home NAT):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________



At Point B (Home NAT → ISP NAT):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________



At Point C (ISP NAT → Server):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________



What source IP does the Server see? __________









Section B: Inbound NAT (DNAT / Port Forwarding)






Problem 4: Basic DNAT






                       ┌────────────┐
│ NAT Router │
┌────────────┐ │ │ ┌────────────┐
│ Internet ├────────►│ WAN: 203.0.113.10 │ Web Server │
│ Client │ │ LAN: 10.0.0.1├─────►│ │
│ 72.45.67.89│ │ │ │ 10.0.0.100 │
└────────────┘ │ DNAT: │ └────────────┘
│ 80→10.0.0.100:80
└────────────┘






Internet Client connects to http://203.0.113.10 (port 80).



At Point A (Client → NAT Router WAN):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________



At Point B (NAT Router → Web Server):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________



What source IP does the Web Server see? __________









Problem 5: DNAT Through Router (Security Scenario)






┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐
│ Attacker │ │ Router │ │ Firewall │ │ SSH Server │
│ ├────────►│ ├────────►│ (NAT) ├────────►│ │
│ 45.33.32.1 │ │ │ │ WAN: 104.44.1.1 │ 10.0.0.50 │
└────────────┘ │ 45.33.32.254 │ DNAT: 22→10.0.0.50:22│ │
└────────────┘ └────────────┘ └────────────┘






Attacker attempts SSH to 104.44.1.1.



At Point A (Attacker → Router):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________



At Point B (Router → Firewall):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________



At Point C (Firewall → SSH Server):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________



The SSH Server has this firewall rule:




iptables -A INPUT -s 45.33.32.254 --dport 22 -j DROP






Will this block the attacker? __________



Why? __________









Section C: Firewall Troubleshooting






Problem 6: The Classic NAT Trap






┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐
│ Developer │ │ Office NAT │ │ Router │ │ File Server│
│ ├────────►│ ├────────►│ ├────────►│ │
│192.168.1.50│ │ WAN: 198.51.100.10 │ │ │ 20.0.0.100 │
└────────────┘ │ LAN: 192.168.1.1 │ 198.51.100.254 └────────────┘
└────────────┘ └────────────┘






File Server has this iptables rule:




iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.50 --dport 22 -j ACCEPT






Will the Developer be able to SSH to the File Server? __________



What source IP does the File Server actually see? __________



Write the corrected iptables rule: __________









Problem 7: VPN Without NAT






┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐
│ Admin │ │ VPN GW │ │ Server │
│ ├─────────┤ ├────────►│ │
│ 10.8.0.50 │ VPN │ 10.8.0.1 │ │ 172.16.0.10│
│(VPN tunnel)│ │ 172.16.0.1 │ │ │
└────────────┘ └────────────┘ └────────────┘

Note: VPN Gateway does NOT NAT internal traffic.






Admin SSHs to Server (172.16.0.10).



What source IP does the Server see? __________



Server has firewall rule:




iptables -A INPUT -s 10.8.0.0/24 --dport 22 -j ACCEPT






Will Admin be allowed to SSH? __________









Problem 8: Same Private IP, Different Offices






┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐
│ Seattle │ │ Seattle │ │ │ │ │
│ Developer ├────────►│ NAT Router ├────────►│ Internet ├────────►│ Cloud LB │
│192.168.1.75│ │ WAN: 52.12.1.1 │ │ │ 35.200.1.1 │
└────────────┘ └────────────┘ │ │ └─────┬──────┘
│ │ │
┌────────────┐ ┌────────────┐ │ │ ┌─────▼──────┐
│ Austin │ │ Austin │ │ │ │ Backend │
│ Developer ├────────►│ NAT Router ├────────►│ │ │ Server │
│192.168.1.75│ │ WAN: 104.210.1.1 │ │ │ 10.0.0.50 │
└────────────┘ └────────────┘ └────────────┘ └────────────┘

Note: Both developers have the SAME private IP (192.168.1.75) - different offices.
Cloud Load Balancer DNATs to Backend Server.






Backend Server has this firewall rule:




iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.75 --dport 443 -j ACCEPT






Will Seattle Developer connect? __________



Will Austin Developer connect? __________



What two source IPs does Backend Server actually see?




  • Seattle: __________

  • Austin: __________



Write corrected firewall rules to allow both offices: __________









Problem 9: IP Allowlisting






┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐
│ App Server │ │ NAT Gateway│ │ External │
│ ├────────►│ ├────────►│ API │
│ 10.0.2.50 │ │ priv: 10.0.2.1 │ 151.101.1.1│
└────────────┘ │ pub: 54.23.45.67 └────────────┘
└────────────┘






App Server makes HTTPS request to External API.



What source IP does External API see? __________



External API has allowlist:




Allowed IPs: 54.23.45.67, 54.23.45.68






Will the request succeed? __________









Problem 10: Blocking a Scanner (The Trap)






┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐
│ Malicious │ │ Router │ │ Firewall │ │ Web Server │
│ Scanner ├────────►│ (no NAT)├────────►│ (NAT) ├────────►│ │
│ 45.33.32.1 │ │ │ │ WAN: 104.44.1.1 │ 10.0.0.80 │
└────────────┘ │ 45.33.32.254 │ DNAT: 443→10.0.0.80 │ │
└────────────┘ └────────────┘ └────────────┘






Web Server has this firewall rule to block the scanner:




iptables -A INPUT -s 45.33.32.254 -j DROP






Will this rule block the scanner? __________



What source IP does the Web Server see? __________



Write the corrected blocking rule: __________









Section D: Return Traffic






Problem 11: Outbound Return Path






┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐
│ Client │ │ NAT Router │ │ Server │
│ │◄────────┤ │◄────────┤ │
│ 10.0.0.50 │ │ WAN: 203.0.113.5 │ 93.184.216.34
└────────────┘ │ LAN: 10.0.0.1│ └────────────┘
└────────────┘






Server sends HTTP response back to Client.



At Point A (Server → NAT Router):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________



At Point B (NAT Router → Client):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________



What changes the destination IP from 203.0.113.5 to 10.0.0.50? __________









Problem 12: DNAT Return Path






┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐         ┌────────────┐
│ Internet │ │ Firewall │ │ Web Server │
│ Client │◄────────┤ (NAT) │◄────────┤ │
│ 72.45.67.89│ │ DNAT: 80→10.0.0.100 │ 10.0.0.100 │
└────────────┘ │ WAN: 203.0.113.10 └────────────┘
└────────────┘






Web Server sends HTTP response back to Internet Client.



At Point A (Web Server → Firewall):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________



At Point B (Firewall → Internet Client):




  • Source IP: __________

  • Destination IP: __________









⭐ Found This Useful?



I'm building an open-source Security Engineering interview prep repository with:




  • 🔥 More packet tracing problems

  • 🔥 iptables scenario labs

  • 🔥 SQL injection practice

  • 🔥 Threat modeling exercises

  • 🔥 System design questions



Star the repo on GitHub to support the project and get notified of new content!









Answer Key






Section A: Outbound NAT






Problem 1





  • Point A: SRC=10.0.0.50, DST=93.184.216.34


  • Point B: SRC=203.0.113.5, DST=93.184.216.34



Key insight: NAT changes the source IP. Destination stays the same.






Problem 2





  • Point A: SRC=192.168.1.100, DST=8.8.8.8


  • Point B: SRC=74.125.1.1, DST=8.8.8.8


  • Point C: SRC=74.125.1.1, DST=8.8.8.8



Key insight: The Router doesn't change the source IP—only NAT does.






Problem 3





  • Point A: SRC=192.168.0.25, DST=151.101.1.69


  • Point B: SRC=100.64.1.50, DST=151.101.1.69


  • Point C: SRC=52.1.2.3, DST=151.101.1.69


  • Server sees: 52.1.2.3



Key insight: Each NAT changes the source IP. Two NATs = two translations.









Section B: Inbound NAT






Problem 4





  • Point A: SRC=72.45.67.89, DST=203.0.113.10


  • Point B: SRC=72.45.67.89, DST=10.0.0.100


  • Web Server sees: 72.45.67.89



Key insight: DNAT changes the destination, not the source. The client's real IP survives.






Problem 5





  • Point A: SRC=45.33.32.1, DST=104.44.1.1


  • Point B: SRC=45.33.32.1, DST=104.44.1.1


  • Point C: SRC=45.33.32.1, DST=10.0.0.50


  • Will it block? NO


  • Why? The rule blocks 45.33.32.254 (the router), but the attacker's real IP is 45.33.32.1. Routers don't change source IPs.



Correct rule:




iptables -A INPUT -s 45.33.32.1 --dport 22 -j DROP












Section C: Firewall Troubleshooting






Problem 6





  • Will Developer SSH? NO


  • File Server sees: 198.51.100.10


  • Corrected rule:




iptables -A INPUT -s 198.51.100.10 --dport 22 -j ACCEPT






This is the #1 interview question pattern. Private IPs don't survive NAT.






Problem 7





  • Server sees: 10.8.0.50


  • Will Admin SSH? YES (10.8.0.50 is within 10.8.0.0/24)



Key insight: Without NAT, the original source IP is preserved.






Problem 8





  • Seattle connect? NO


  • Austin connect? NO


  • Backend Server sees:


    • Seattle: 52.12.1.1

    • Austin: 104.210.1.1








  • Corrected rules:





iptables -A INPUT -s 52.12.1.1 --dport 443 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -s 104.210.1.1 --dport 443 -j ACCEPT






Key insight: Same private IP in different offices = different public IPs after NAT.






Problem 9





  • External API sees: 54.23.45.67


  • Will request succeed? YES (54.23.45.67 is in the allowlist)



Real-world application: This is why companies give their NAT Gateway IPs to third-party APIs.






Problem 10





  • Will it block? NO


  • Web Server sees: 45.33.32.1


  • Corrected rule:




iptables -A INPUT -s 45.33.32.1 -j DROP






The trap: Routers don't change source IPs. The scanner's real IP passes through.









Section D: Return Traffic






Problem 11





  • Point A: SRC=93.184.216.34, DST=203.0.113.5


  • Point B: SRC=93.184.216.34, DST=10.0.0.50


  • What changes it? NAT connection tracking (conntrack)



Key insight: NAT remembers the original mapping and reverses it for return traffic.






Problem 12





  • Point A: SRC=10.0.0.100, DST=72.45.67.89


  • Point B: SRC=203.0.113.10, DST=72.45.67.89



Key insight: Conntrack reverses DNAT—the source IP changes back to the public IP so the client recognizes the response.









Scoring

































Section Questions Points
A: Outbound NAT Q1-Q3 30
B: Inbound NAT Q4-Q5 20
C: Troubleshooting Q6-Q10 40
D: Return Traffic Q11-Q12 10


Total: 100 points

Passing: 85 points









The Golden Rules
































Rule Explanation
NAT changes source (outbound) SNAT/MASQUERADE rewrites source IP
NAT changes destination (inbound) DNAT rewrites destination IP
Routers DON'T change IPs They only forward packets
Source survives DNAT Attacker's real IP reaches the server
Conntrack reverses translations Return traffic is automatically handled








Next Steps



If you scored below 85%, review the problems you missed and retry in 24 hours. Spaced repetition is key.



⭐ Star the GitHub repo for more Security Engineering interview prep materials!






Did this help you? Drop a comment with your score! Let's see how many people can hit 100%.

🔍 CTI & Forensik

Cyber Threat Intelligence & Forensik

ATT&CK-Navigator · IoC-Radar · Exploit-Belege
MITRE ATT&CK Matrix Navigator
Enterprise-Matrix · nur belegte Techniken
14 Taktiken
1 belegte Technik
T1190TA0001 · Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application
Mitigation: M1042 Network Segmentation & WAF Rule Enforcement
Quelle: Kontext-Klassifikation des Artikeltextes
Reconnaissance
Resource Development
Initial Access
Execution
Persistence
Privilege Escalation
Defense Evasion
Credential Access
Discovery
Lateral Movement
Collection
Command and Control
Exfiltration
Impact
IoC Intelligence
23 Indikatoren · Defanged · STIX 2.1
198[.]51[.]100[.]1020[.]0[.]0[.]100198[.]51[.]100[.]254203[.]0[.]113[.]593[.]184[.]216[.]3474[.]125[.]1[.]18[.]8[.]8[.]874[.]125[.]1[.]254+15 weitere
CTI Threat Relationship Graph
Akteure · Techniken · Beziehungen
8 Knoten · 7 Relationen
CVE / Incident Threat Actor Software MITRE ATT&CK CWE Weakness IoC
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten Week 4 Network Packet Tracing

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: Week, Network, Packet, Tracing · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

💬 Kommentare werden geladen…
Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
Nächster Beitrag