Zum Hauptinhalt springen
tsecurity.de LIVE
Echtzeit-Radar & Feeds
Alle RSS Feeds
👥 Community & Social
IT Security DownloadsGitHub Release: ollama/ollama v0.34.4-rc0 (23.09.2026)(23.09.2026 um 02:53 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungMy fact-checker said CONFIRMED about a group that doesn't exist(23.09.2026 um 02:13 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungZero-Friction Payment Architectures for Global Scalability(23.09.2026 um 02:20 Uhr)
IT Security DownloadsGitHub Release: ollama/ollama v0.34.4-rc0 (23.09.2026)(23.09.2026 um 02:53 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungMy fact-checker said CONFIRMED about a group that doesn't exist(23.09.2026 um 02:13 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungZero-Friction Payment Architectures for Global Scalability(23.09.2026 um 02:20 Uhr)
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

QA is dead 2005 vs 2015 vs 2025

Every couple of years, the same wave hits LinkedIn: "QA is being eliminated," "testers will be replaced," "QA teams are the first to go." In 2025, the boogeyman is AI. Before that, it was shift-left. Before that - automation. Before that…

0
↗ Quelle (dev.to)
Reagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!



Every couple of years, the same wave hits LinkedIn: "QA is being eliminated," "testers will be replaced," "QA teams are the first to go."



In 2025, the boogeyman is AI. Before that, it was shift-left. Before that - automation. Before that — Agile. The framing changes, the panic stays the same.



But here's the thing - none of this is new. Not even close.



2011 - Facebook had no dedicated QA team. Simon Stewart (creator of WebDriver) had already explained that developers owned quality. The Quora thread "Is it true that Facebook has no testers?" is from that era.



2012 - "How Google Tests Software" came out. Google had already transformed QA into Test Engineers and Software Engineers in Tools & Infrastructure. Developers owned their tests. The "traditional QA is dead" narrative was already in full swing.



2014 - Microsoft eliminated the SDET role during an 18,000-person layoff. Entire testing organizations were restructured overnight. Gergely Orosz documented this firsthand in "How Big Tech does QA."



2015 - ThoughtWorks published "Is QA Dead?" Yahoo cut its QA department entirely. Slashdot had a 500+ comment thread debating it. Elisabeth Hendrickson introduced "testing = checking + exploring" at OnAgile — addressing the exact same fear we see today.



2015 - Also the year the Slashdot thread "No More QA: Yahoo's Tech Leaders Say Engineers Are Better Off Coding With No Net" went viral. Read the comments. They could've been written yesterday.



That was a decade ago. QA didn't die. It adapted. Testers who evolved - survived and thrived. Those who didn't - struggled. Same as in every profession.



Fast-forward to today, and replace "automation" with "AI agents" - the script is identical. "QA will be replaced by AI." "You won't need testers anymore." "Your team will be cut in half."



And conveniently, there's always a tool to sell you right after the scare.

Here's what actually happens every single time: the panic fades, the roles evolve, and the people who understand systems, edge cases, risk, and user behavior remain indispensable. Because quality isn't a phase you bolt on — it's a mindset. No tool replaces that.



If you're a QA engineer reading yet another "your job is disappearing" post, relax. Learn, adapt, stay curious. But don't let recycled fear-mongering from people selling solutions make you question your value.



This conversation has been going in circles for 15 years. The only thing that changes is who profits from the panic.

Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten QA is dead 2005 vs 2015 vs 2025

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: dead, 2005, 2015, 2025 · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
ZERO-DAY CVE-2026-17636 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow…
Advisory →
TTS Reader • tsecurity.de Voice
tsecurity.de Icon
tsecurity.de App
Offline-Lesen, Eilmeldungen & 0ms Ladezeit

Installiere tsecurity.de direkt auf deinen Home-Bildschirm für das ultimative Vollbild-Magazinerlebnis ohne Browser-Leisten.

Nächster Beitrag
Themen-Radar & Intelligence Matrix
Echtzeit-Taxonomie nach Angriffsvektoren & Plattformen

tsecurity.de Live Threat Radar

🔴 LIVE RADAR
MONITORING
AKTIV
CVE-DATENBANK
LIVE
🔍
Community Radar & Live Chat
Sentinel Bot online • Live-Stream
Dein Cluster: Security Explorer
Match:
lädt…
Verbindung zum Community-Stream wird aufgebaut...
Bearbeitungsmodus — Senden überschreibt deine Nachricht
Community-Puls — was gerade passiert
lädt…
Aktivitäten deiner Analysten
lädt…
Neues Thema oder Eilmeldung einreichen

Reiche interessante Links, Zero-Days oder Debatten ein. Die Community entscheidet per Upvote über die Veröffentlichung.

Heiß diskutierte Einreichungen
🔖 Gespeicherte Artikel
📂 Keine gespeicherten Artikel vorhanden.
Zurück Ziehen Vor
Links: vorheriger Artikel Rechts: nächster Artikel unten: schließen
News NIS-2 Frühwarnung Tier-1 Intel ⏱️ 3 Min vor 10 Min
Artikeldaten werden geladen...

Zurück: vorheriger Vor: nächster
↗ Original-Quelle
Social Reaktionen Deine Reaktion zählt
Einstufung & Relevanz-Poll 0 Stimmen
In sozialen Netzwerken teilen 1-Klick