Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Echtzeit-Radar & Feeds
Alle RSS Feeds ➔
👥 Community & Social
Windows Tipps & SecurityGrafikkarte vor Überhitzung schützen: So geht’s(25.09.2026 um 08:00 Uhr)
••••••••••
Windows Tipps & SecurityGrafikkarte vor Überhitzung schützen: So geht’s(25.09.2026 um 08:00 Uhr)
••••••••••
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

I built an AI tool for incident investigation (looking for honest feedback)

Hey everyone 👋 Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been building a side project called Opsrift. It started from a pretty simple frustration:postmortems, handovers, and incident documentation take way too much time — and most of it is repe…

0
↗ Quelle (dev.to)
Reagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!

Hey everyone 👋



Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been building a side project called Opsrift.



It started from a pretty simple frustration:postmortems, handovers, and incident documentation take way too much time — and most of it is repetitive.



But while building it, I realized something more interesting:



The real problem isn’t writing postmortems.It’s understanding what actually happened during an incident.



So I ended up going a bit further than just a generator.



What Opsrift does right now



The platform is focused on incident workflows — mostly for people working in SRE, support, or operations.



Right now it includes:




  1. Postmortem generator



Takes incident data and generates structured postmortems in seconds.




  1. Handover generator



Useful for shift-based teams — turns messy updates into clean handovers.




  1. Runbook generator



Creates structured runbooks based on incident patterns or inputs.




  1. Incident Investigator (main focus)



This is the part I’m most interested in:



Pulls data from tools like Jira, PagerDuty, and Opsgenie



Correlates it with deployments from GitHub



Tries to reconstruct what actually happened (timeline, possible causes, etc.)



The goal is to reduce the time spent jumping between tools during investigations.




  1. Status page



Basic external communication for incidents.



Integrations



Current integrations:



Jira



PagerDuty



Opsgenie



GitHub



Slack



Confluence



Still early — some of these are rough.



What it’s NOT (yet)



I want to be upfront:



It’s not a replacement for your incident management tools



It’s not perfect at root cause analysis



It’s not “production-grade” in every edge case



Right now it’s closer to:



an AI layer on top of your existing tools to speed up investigation and documentation



Known issues



To save you time:



GitHub login ❌ (bugged right now)



Slack login ❌ (also bugged)



👉 You can still use:



Google login



Email/password signup



Fixing these next.



What I’m trying to figure out



This is where I’d really appreciate help.



I’m trying to validate a few things:



Does the Incident Investigator actually help or is it just “nice to have”?



Are the outputs accurate enough to be trusted?



Would you use something like this in real workflows?



What’s missing for it to be genuinely useful?



Where I want to take this



Longer term, I’m thinking about moving beyond just generating outputs and more into:



detecting patterns across incidents



identifying unstable services



highlighting teams with high escalation rates



correlating deployments with incidents automatically



Basically:



turning incident data into something you can actually act on



If you want to try it



👉 https://opsrift.com



No pressure — even quick feedback is super helpful.



Final note



I’ve worked in NOC/SOC and incident-heavy environments, so this is very much a “scratch your own itch” project.



That said, I’m aware tools like this can easily become:



too generic



inaccurate



or just another dashboard nobody uses



So I’d rather get honest feedback early.



Even if it’s:



“this doesn’t solve anything for me”



That’s useful.



Thanks in advance 🙌

1. Sofort-Triage & Abwehrmaßnahmen

SOC Incident Playbook: Vulnerability Remediation & Verification
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
title: Detect Exploitation - I built an AI tool for incident investigation (looking for honest feedback)
id: 4df0ae5f-d996-4ab2-ae21-3f47815163a1
status: experimental
description: Automatisch generierte SIEM-Erkennungsregel basierend auf CTI Intelligence
references:
  - https://tsecurity.de/
author: iShareStuff CTI Automated Detection Engine
date: 2026-09-26
logsource:
  category: network_connection
  product: any
detection:
  selection:
      CommandLine|contains:
        - 'exploit'
  condition: selection
falsepositives:
  - Legitime administrative Zugriffe oder Penetrationstests
level: high
tags:
  - attack.initial_access
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
rule CTI_Threat_Indicator {
    meta:
        author = "iShareStuff CTI Automated Detection Engine"
        date = "2026-09-26"
        description = "YARA Signature for "
    strings:
        $str = "I built an AI tool for inciden" ascii wide
    condition:
        any of them
}
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
index=security sourcetype IN ("cisco:asa", "pan:traffic", "zeek_conn", "suricata", "WinEventLog:Security")
("I built an AI tool for incident investig")
| stats count earliest(_time) as first_seen latest(_time) as last_seen by src_ip, dest_ip, dest_host, signature
| eval first_seen=strftime(first_seen, "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"), last_seen=strftime(last_seen, "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")
| sort - count
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
message: "*I built an AI tool for incident investig*"
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
CommonSecurityLog
| where Message has "I built an AI tool for incident investig"
| summarize EventCount = count(), FirstSeen = min(TimeGenerated), LastSeen = max(TimeGenerated) by SourceIP, DestinationIP, DestinationPort, Activity
| extend DetectionRule = "iShareStuff-CTI-Compiled"
| sort by EventCount desc

2. Cyber Threat Intelligence & Forensik

CTI Threat Relationship Graph2 Knoten / 1 Relationen
CVE / Incident Software MITRE ATT&CK CWE Weakness IoC
🎯
MITRE ATT&CK Matrix Navigator 14 Taktiken
Reconnaissance
-
Resource Development
-
Initial Access
Execution
Persistence
-
Privilege Escalation
Defense Evasion
Credential Access
-
Discovery
-
Lateral Movement
-
Collection
-
Command and Control
Exfiltration
-
Impact
tsecurity.de Cognitive Threat RAG
Fokus-Vektor:

Kognitive Analyse für identifizierte Bedrohung: Erhöhte Bedrohungslage im Bereich I built an AI tool for incident investig.... Basierend auf 368k Vektor-Korrelationen werden sofortige Isolationsmaßnahmen für betroffene Endpunkte empfohlen.

🛡️ Angriffsfläche & Exposure

Netzwerk/Remote-Zugriff ohne Vorauthentifizierung möglich.

⚡ Empfohlene Sofortmaßnahmen
  • 1. Perimeter-Inspektion: Relevante Portfreigaben und exponierte Endpunkte unverzüglich scannen.
  • 2. Patch-Applikation: Hersteller-Hotfix einspielen oder betroffene Daemons in isolierte DMZ-Segmente überführen.
  • 3. Telemetrie & EDR-Alerts: Prozessaufrufe und Child-Processes auf anomale Shell-Spawns überwachen.
🔗 Semantisch verwandte Zero-Days MariaDB 11.7 VEC
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten I built an AI tool for incident investigation (looking for honest feedback)

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: built, tool, incident, investigation · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
ZERO-DAY CVE-2026-86066 | Horilla is an HR and CRM software. Prior to 2.0.0, approve_validate_atte…
Advisory →
tsecurity.de Icon
Offline-Lesen, Eilmeldungen & 0ms Ladezeit

Installiere tsecurity.de direkt auf deinen Home-Bildschirm für das ultimative Vollbild-Magazinerlebnis ohne Browser-Leisten.

Nächster Beitrag