Zum Hauptinhalt springen
tsecurity.de LIVE
Echtzeit-Radar & Feeds
Alle RSS Feeds
👥 Community & Social
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)USN-8797-1: GStreamer Base Plugins vulnerability(21.09.2026 um 20:05 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungYou can build HTML emails with Tailwind CSS(21.09.2026 um 22:15 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungDEV-Part-1-Backend.md(21.09.2026 um 22:24 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungWhat It Actually Costs to Serve a 1M-Token Model in Production(21.09.2026 um 22:33 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungHow to Check an Agent's Diagnosis Before It Touches Production(21.09.2026 um 22:53 Uhr)
Linux Tipps & HardeningWhat if Spotify was self-hosted? I think I got pretty close.(21.09.2026 um 22:33 Uhr)
Linux Tipps & HardeningSandboxing on Linux(21.09.2026 um 22:45 Uhr)
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)USN-8797-1: GStreamer Base Plugins vulnerability(21.09.2026 um 20:05 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungYou can build HTML emails with Tailwind CSS(21.09.2026 um 22:15 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungDEV-Part-1-Backend.md(21.09.2026 um 22:24 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungWhat It Actually Costs to Serve a 1M-Token Model in Production(21.09.2026 um 22:33 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungHow to Check an Agent's Diagnosis Before It Touches Production(21.09.2026 um 22:53 Uhr)
Linux Tipps & HardeningWhat if Spotify was self-hosted? I think I got pretty close.(21.09.2026 um 22:33 Uhr)
Linux Tipps & HardeningSandboxing on Linux(21.09.2026 um 22:45 Uhr)
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

Noise vs. Signal: The Central Paradox of LLMs in Threat Modeling track 2

YouTube-Video: Author: OWASP Foundation - Bewertung: 0x - Views:1 Large Language Models promise faster, automated threat modeling. But in practice, they…

0
↗ Quelle (youtube.com)
Reagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!

Author: OWASP Foundation - Bewertung: 0x - Views:1

Large Language Models promise faster, automated threat modeling. But in practice, they introduce a fundamental and intractable failure mode, which we call “The Central Paradox”. When asked to generate all possible threats, LLMs produce excessive noise that overwhelms developers and AppSec teams. Yet, when asked to identify only the “important” threats, the same models demonstrate properties that are non-deterministic, opaque, and untrustworthy. You cannot rely on their selections with 100% confidence, and you cannot reproduce their choices. Used indiscriminately in threat modeling, LLMs generate more work, reduce reliability, undermine credibility with stakeholders, and create an absence of regulatory readiness.



This talk dissects the Central Paradox and explains why threat modeling, unlike content generation, requires determinism, reproducibility, and auditability. We outline the seven failure modes common to LLM-only approaches: hallucinations, explainability theater, validation gaps, automation bias, token inefficiency, data sovereignty concerns, and non-reproducible outputs.



We then present an alternative: more deterministic AI architectures that use expert systems, embedding-based retrieval, and graph analysis to produce consistent, explainable threat models. Finally, we show where LLMs do belong: in building context, summarization, rule suggestion, verification of control implementations, and human-facing interfaces assisting in security decisions.



Attendees will leave with a clear framework for building hybrid systems that eliminate noise, preserve signal, and restore trust in AI-assisted threat modeling.



Vikramaditya Narayan

Creator of The Precogly Open Source Threat Modeling Platform



Vikramaditya Narayan is the creator of Precogly, an open-source, enterprise-grade threat modeling platform built for compliance-aware security teams. Previously, he designed the prototype for a YC-funded AI governance platform. Vikramaditya leads the Bangalore chapter of Threat Modeling Connect and has spoken at ThreatModCon DC on emergent risks in multi-agentic systems. He holds an MS from Carnegie Mellon and is a Certified Threat Modeling Professional.

-





Managed by the OWASP® Foundation

https://owasp.org/

Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten Noise vs. Signal: The Central Paradox of LLMs in Threat Modeling track 2

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: Noise, Signal, Central, Paradox · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
ZERO-DAY CVE-2026-45381 | Tautulli is a Python based monitoring and tracking tool for Plex Media S…
Advisory →
TTS Reader • tsecurity.de Voice
tsecurity.de Icon
tsecurity.de App
Offline-Lesen, Eilmeldungen & 0ms Ladezeit

Installiere tsecurity.de direkt auf deinen Home-Bildschirm für das ultimative Vollbild-Magazinerlebnis ohne Browser-Leisten.

Nächster Beitrag
Themen-Radar & Intelligence Matrix
Echtzeit-Taxonomie nach Angriffsvektoren & Plattformen

tsecurity.de Live Threat Radar

🔴 LIVE RADAR
MONITORING
AKTIV
CVE-DATENBANK
LIVE
🔍
Community Radar & Live Chat
Sentinel Bot online • Live-Stream
Dein Cluster: Security Explorer
Match:
lädt…
Verbindung zum Community-Stream wird aufgebaut...
Bearbeitungsmodus — Senden überschreibt deine Nachricht
Community-Puls — was gerade passiert
lädt…
Aktivitäten deiner Analysten
lädt…
Neues Thema oder Eilmeldung einreichen

Reiche interessante Links, Zero-Days oder Debatten ein. Die Community entscheidet per Upvote über die Veröffentlichung.

Heiß diskutierte Einreichungen
🔖 Gespeicherte Artikel
📂 Keine gespeicherten Artikel vorhanden.
Zurück Ziehen Vor
Links: vorheriger Artikel Rechts: nächster Artikel unten: schließen
News NIS-2 Frühwarnung Tier-1 Intel ⏱️ 3 Min vor 10 Min
Artikeldaten werden geladen...

Zurück: vorheriger Vor: nächster
↗ Original-Quelle
Social Reaktionen Deine Reaktion zählt
Einstufung & Relevanz-Poll 0 Stimmen
In sozialen Netzwerken teilen 1-Klick