Zum Hauptinhalt springen
tsecurity.de LIVE
Echtzeit-Radar & Feeds
Alle RSS Feeds
👥 Community & Social
Sichere ProgrammierungRelease Notes for Safari Technology Preview 253(23.09.2026 um 23:46 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungNode 20 is no longer available in GitHub Actions(23.09.2026 um 22:46 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungMore ways to request and configure Copilot code reviews(23.09.2026 um 23:25 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungApache Data Lakehouse Weekly: September 15 to 23, 2026(23.09.2026 um 23:14 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungObservatorio de gastos públicos(23.09.2026 um 23:15 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungRelease Notes for Safari Technology Preview 253(23.09.2026 um 23:46 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungNode 20 is no longer available in GitHub Actions(23.09.2026 um 22:46 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungMore ways to request and configure Copilot code reviews(23.09.2026 um 23:25 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungApache Data Lakehouse Weekly: September 15 to 23, 2026(23.09.2026 um 23:14 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungObservatorio de gastos públicos(23.09.2026 um 23:15 Uhr)
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

How to catch AI hallucinations before they reach production

LLMs hallucinate. That's not news. What's underdiscussed is how that failure mode behaves in long working sessions: confident reconstruction that looks fluent, cites specifics, and feels right — until three sessions later when something s…

0
↗ Quelle (dev.to)
Reagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!

LLMs hallucinate. That's not news. What's underdiscussed is how that failure mode behaves in long working sessions: confident reconstruction that looks fluent, cites specifics, and feels right — until three sessions later when something supposed to be true turns out not to be.



This is week 5 of an 8-week deep dive on CRAFT for Cowork, a structured working environment for Claude. The QA framework treats AI reliability as a measurable engineering problem.






The four gates



CRAFT's verification core is a reusable sub-routine — RCP-CWK-024 — that any recipe can call before reporting a result:




Gate 1: File-pointability
Can the claim be traced to a specific file?
Gate 2: Read-vs-reconstructed
Was the data read this session, or recalled from memory?
Gate 3: Lessons-Learned conflict
Does the claim contradict a documented LL entry?
Gate 4: Untested assumption
Is this verified or assumed?






A claim that fails any gate gets flagged — visibly to the user, not buried in the answer.






Confidence scoring with decay



Every claim also gets a 0-100 confidence score, graded against a source hierarchy:





  • 80-100 — Evidence read directly from files


  • 50-79 — Behavioral observation of tool output


  • 30-49 — Design intent inferred from documentation


  • 0-29 — Pure reasoning, no source



A 10-point penalty applies once the session passes 70% token usage — the late-session decay correction. The scoring isn't there to make you suspicious of the AI. It's there to give you a calibrated read on a specific claim.






Real receipts



The framework caught nine Week-1 content files in this campaign that referenced CRAFT as "open source" — incorrect (it's a dual license: BSL 1.1 spec, proprietary content). The factual claim validator flagged the mismatch with documented license language. All nine corrected pre-publication.



The cross-file audit recipe (RCP-CWK-036) runs every 5-10 sessions and has caught ~40% drift in tracking-file state tables. Drift that would otherwise propagate as silent ground truth into every subsequent session.






Try it



CRAFT for Cowork: free public beta on GitHub.



🔗 https://github.com/CRAFTFramework/craft-framework

🔗 License: https://craftframework.ai/craft-license/ (BSL 1.1 → Apache 2.0 on Jan 1 2029 for the spec; proprietary for content)



Last week: device switching across desktop and laptop. Next week: the project structure that makes verification possible.

CTI Threat Relationship Graph2 Knoten / 1 Relationen
CVE / Incident Software MITRE ATT&CK CWE Weakness IoC
IR-PLAYBOOK-RCE
HIGH
SOC Incident Playbook: Remote Code Execution (RCE) Defense
1-Click Detection Engineering: Sigma & YARA Rules
SOC Ready
title: Detect Exploitation - How to catch AI hallucinations before they reach production
id: a08714da-4f2b-41d6-b225-480e769c59f3
status: experimental
description: Automatisch generierte SIEM-Erkennungsregel basierend auf CTI Intelligence
references:
  - https://tsecurity.de/
author: iShareStuff CTI Automated Detection Engine
date: 2026-09-24
logsource:
  category: network_connection
  product: any
detection:
  selection:
      CommandLine|contains:
        - 'exploit'
  condition: selection
falsepositives:
  - Legitime administrative Zugriffe oder Penetrationstests
level: high
tags:
  - attack.initial_access
rule CTI_Threat_Indicator {
    meta:
        author = "iShareStuff CTI Automated Detection Engine"
        date = "2026-09-24"
        description = "YARA Signature for "
    strings:
        $str = "How to catch AI hallucinations" ascii wide
    condition:
        any of them
}
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten How to catch AI hallucinations before they reach production

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: catch, hallucinations, before, they · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
ZERO-DAY CVE-2026-96550 | A vulnerability was found in sfturing hosp_order up to 627f426331da8086c…
Advisory →
TTS Reader • tsecurity.de Voice
tsecurity.de Icon
tsecurity.de App
Offline-Lesen, Eilmeldungen & 0ms Ladezeit

Installiere tsecurity.de direkt auf deinen Home-Bildschirm für das ultimative Vollbild-Magazinerlebnis ohne Browser-Leisten.

Nächster Beitrag
Themen-Radar & Intelligence Matrix
Echtzeit-Taxonomie nach Angriffsvektoren & Plattformen

tsecurity.de Live Threat Radar

🔴 LIVE RADAR
MONITORING
AKTIV
CVE-DATENBANK
LIVE
🔍
Community Radar & Live Chat
Sentinel Bot online • Live-Stream
Dein Cluster: Security Explorer
Match:
lädt…
Verbindung zum Community-Stream wird aufgebaut...
Bearbeitungsmodus — Senden überschreibt deine Nachricht
Community-Puls — was gerade passiert
lädt…
Aktivitäten deiner Analysten
lädt…
Neues Thema oder Eilmeldung einreichen

Reiche interessante Links, Zero-Days oder Debatten ein. Die Community entscheidet per Upvote über die Veröffentlichung.

Heiß diskutierte Einreichungen
🔖 Gespeicherte Artikel
📂 Keine gespeicherten Artikel vorhanden.
Zurück Ziehen Vor
Links: vorheriger Artikel Rechts: nächster Artikel unten: schließen
News NIS-2 Frühwarnung Tier-1 Intel TTP ⏱️ 3 Min vor 10 Min
Artikeldaten werden geladen...

Zurück: vorheriger Vor: nächster
↗ Original-Quelle
Social Reaktionen Deine Reaktion zählt
Einstufung & Relevanz-Poll 0 Stimmen
In sozialen Netzwerken teilen 1-Klick