Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Echtzeit-Radar & Feeds
Alle RSS Feeds ➔
👥 Community & Social
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)Apple Patches CoreGraphics Zero Day Exploited in Attacks(30.09.2026 um 10:45 Uhr)
•
IT Security NachrichtenOpengear pens first European distribution deal with Ingram Micro(30.09.2026 um 10:20 Uhr)
•
IT Security NachrichtenGoogle beendet ChromeOS-Updates Mitte 2034(30.09.2026 um 10:01 Uhr)
•
IT Security NachrichtenUnternehmen müssen bei der Domain ansetzen(30.09.2026 um 10:28 Uhr)
•
IT Security NachrichtenUK rail cops' £320K face-scanning spree nets zero matches(30.09.2026 um 10:30 Uhr)
•
IT Security NachrichtenGoogle Fotos erhält lange ersehntes Feature: Verpixeln direkt in App(30.09.2026 um 10:21 Uhr)
•
IT Security NachrichtenNeue KI-Seite des Weißen Hauses bestätigt: Trump verlor die Wahl 2020(30.09.2026 um 10:42 Uhr)
•
IT Security DownloadsSignal löst ein großes Backup-Problem auf dem iPhone(30.09.2026 um 10:31 Uhr)
••
IT NachrichtenUK rail cops' £320K face-scanning spree nets zero matches(30.09.2026 um 10:30 Uhr)
•
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)Apple Patches CoreGraphics Zero Day Exploited in Attacks(30.09.2026 um 10:45 Uhr)
•
IT Security NachrichtenOpengear pens first European distribution deal with Ingram Micro(30.09.2026 um 10:20 Uhr)
•
IT Security NachrichtenGoogle beendet ChromeOS-Updates Mitte 2034(30.09.2026 um 10:01 Uhr)
•
IT Security NachrichtenUnternehmen müssen bei der Domain ansetzen(30.09.2026 um 10:28 Uhr)
•
IT Security NachrichtenUK rail cops' £320K face-scanning spree nets zero matches(30.09.2026 um 10:30 Uhr)
•
IT Security NachrichtenGoogle Fotos erhält lange ersehntes Feature: Verpixeln direkt in App(30.09.2026 um 10:21 Uhr)
•
IT Security NachrichtenNeue KI-Seite des Weißen Hauses bestätigt: Trump verlor die Wahl 2020(30.09.2026 um 10:42 Uhr)
•
IT Security DownloadsSignal löst ein großes Backup-Problem auf dem iPhone(30.09.2026 um 10:31 Uhr)
••
IT NachrichtenUK rail cops' £320K face-scanning spree nets zero matches(30.09.2026 um 10:30 Uhr)
•
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

Why AI agents still can't buy anything yet

A working tour of x402, OKX APP, ERC-3009, TEE-backed inference, and the missing pieces of the autonomous internet stack. Most "AI agents" today are really just chatbots with tools. The moment an agent needs to independently spend money,…

0
↗ Quelle (dev.to)
Reagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!

A working tour of x402, OKX APP, ERC-3009, TEE-backed inference, and the missing pieces of the autonomous internet stack.



Most "AI agents" today are really just chatbots with tools.



The moment an agent needs to independently spend money, access paid resources, prove identity, or justify a decision, the current web stack starts breaking down.



Every payment, identity, and trust primitive on the modern web was designed for a human clicking a button in a browser.



Agents were never part of the model.



I've been building AI agents for the last six months and this became obvious very quickly: most agents cannot actually do useful things on the open internet without human infrastructure glued around them.



They cannot:




  • pay for APIs autonomously

  • prove they're allowed to access a resource

  • get billed dynamically at request time

  • carry portable identity and reputation

  • prove what decision they made and why

  • protect sensitive business logic from the model provider



The problem is structural.



The good news is that the missing pieces are finally starting to ship publicly, and multiple teams are independently building compatible parts of the stack.



Coinbase is shipping x402.

OKX is shipping APP.

0G Labs is shipping verifiable storage and TEE-backed inference.

Anthropic pushed the MCP ecosystem into the mainstream.



For the first time, these systems are starting to compose into something real.



This post walks through:




  • what agents are missing today

  • the protocols filling those gaps

  • why verifiable receipts and TEE-backed decisions matter

  • a real implementation stitching all of it together







What a real agent actually needs



Strip the phrase "AI agent" down to fundamentals and the requirements become pretty obvious.



An autonomous system needs:





1. A wallet



Real money it can move programmatically.



Not a Stripe customer ID.

Not a human-owned credit card.

Not a manually refreshed API key.



A real wallet.



Ideally gasless, because forcing every agent to also manage ETH for transaction fees becomes operationally painful very quickly.







2. Identity



Other systems need to know:




  • who this agent is

  • who operates it

  • what permissions it has

  • what reputation it carries



Without identity, an agent calling your API is just another anonymous request.



You cannot apply:




  • trust scoring

  • rate limiting

  • fraud heuristics

  • permissions

  • reputation systems



at the agent level.







3. Dynamic billing at the HTTP layer



The modern web flow looks like this:




request

→ blocked

→ create account

→ verify email

→ add payment method

→ generate API key

→ retry request




That flow completely breaks for autonomous software.



Agents need something closer to:




request resource
→ server says "this costs $0.01"
→ agent evaluates
→ pays
→ receives resource






No signup flow.

No dashboard.

No out-of-band billing.



The payment negotiation has to happen directly inside the request/response cycle.







4. Portable memory



Most agent frameworks today store memory in vector databases controlled by the platform itself.



That creates weird ownership problems.



The agent cannot:




  • move its memory somewhere else

  • prove what it knows

  • selectively reveal memory

  • keep sensitive memory private from the model provider



Those are not futuristic requirements.



They're basic ownership guarantees we'd expect from any serious software system.







5. Decisions it can defend



This is the part almost nobody talks about.



If an agent:




  • approves a refund

  • blocks a payment

  • rejects a customer

  • accepts a lead

  • spends money



somebody downstream is eventually going to ask:




"Why did the agent make that decision?"




Right now, most systems cannot answer that.



"The LLM decided" is not a serious audit trail.







The protocols filling the gap



None of this exists as one unified stack yet.



But almost every missing primitive now has at least one working implementation.







x402: pay on resource access



The HTTP 402 status code ("Payment Required") has existed since 1989 and basically sat unused for decades.



Coinbase revived it in 2025 as x402.



The flow is simple:




Agent
↓
GET /resource
↓
402 Payment Required
↓
sign payment authorization
↓
payment submitted
↓
resource unlocked






The server responds with:




  • the price

  • accepted asset

  • recipient address

  • network

  • settlement requirements



The agent signs a payment authorization and submits it back.



The resource unlocks immediately.



No signup flow.

No API key generation.

No human interaction.



Cloudflare shipped a version of this model for AI crawlers under their "pay per crawl" work.



Smaller services are now exposing:




  • paid APIs

  • oracle endpoints

  • downloadable assets

  • inference endpoints



through x402-compatible paywalls.







ERC-3009: the gasless payment primitive underneath it



Both x402 and OKX APP rely heavily on ERC-3009.



ERC-3009 is the signing standard underneath most gasless USDC payments.



Instead of sending a transaction directly on-chain, the agent signs a permission slip saying:




"Allow up to $0.01 USDC to move from my wallet to this merchant before this deadline."




Another system then submits the transaction and pays the gas fee for the agent.



This matters because it removes the requirement for agents to hold ETH.



The agent only needs USDC.



That's a surprisingly important usability improvement.







OKX APP: extending the x402 model



OKX shipped their own protocol variant called APP (Agent Payment Protocol).



At the wire level, APP is extremely similar to x402:




  • same EIP-712 typed signatures

  • same ERC-3009 settlement model

  • same request/response payment flow



But APP adds some important extensions.





Deferred aggregation



Instead of settling every tiny payment individually on-chain, agents can batch many small payments together.



Example:




100 API calls
→ 100 off-chain authorizations
→ 1 on-chain settlement






This becomes important for high-frequency agent workloads.









Session-based billing



APP also introduces the idea of prepaid session budgets.



Example:




Agent prepays $5
→ server deducts usage over time
→ long-running workflow completes






This is important for:




  • video generation

  • deep research

  • multi-step workflows

  • autonomous browsing sessions



The specs exist today.

SDK support is still early.







Agent identity: ERC-8004



Identity for agents is still immature.



ERC-8004 is one early attempt at solving this.



The basic idea:




  • agents get on-chain identities

  • identities contain claims

  • other systems can inspect those claims before interacting



An agent could eventually advertise:




  • operator identity

  • capabilities

  • permissions

  • reputation

  • certifications



Very little production infrastructure depends on ERC-8004 today.



But the underlying problem it tries to solve is real.







The real missing layer: verifiability



Payments alone are not enough.



You also need:




  • verifiable receipts

  • verifiable decisions



This is where the 0G stack becomes interesting.







Verifiable receipts with 0G Storage + 0G Chain



Suppose an agent buys data for $0.10.



A normal payment system gives you:




  • transaction hash

  • payment confirmation



But that is not enough.



You also want:




  • the exact payload that was served

  • proof that it wasn't modified later

  • a permanent cryptographic reference to it



0G Storage handles the content layer.



The receipt or payload gets uploaded into decentralized content-addressed storage.



That returns a root hash.



The root hash then gets anchored onto 0G Chain.



Now the transaction has a 3-layer proof trail:




1. Base transaction
→ proves money moved

2. 0G Storage receipt
→ proves what content was served

3. 0G Chain anchor
→ proves the content was not modified later






A third party can independently verify every step.



Nobody has to trust the merchant.









Verifiable decisions with TEE-backed inference



This is the part I think people are underestimating.



Agents increasingly make policy decisions.



Questions like:




  • should this refund be approved?

  • does this request violate policy?

  • should this payment be blocked?

  • is this customer risky?

  • should this lead be accepted?



Today, those prompts usually go directly to:




  • OpenAI

  • Anthropic

  • Google

  • another centralized inference provider



Which means the provider can theoretically see:




  • refund policies

  • fraud heuristics

  • pricing rules

  • sensitive business logic

  • internal compliance workflows



That becomes a serious issue very quickly.









What a TEE actually changes



0G Compute runs inference inside a TEE (Trusted Execution Environment).



Think of a TEE as hardware-isolated secure memory.



The workload runs inside an encrypted enclave protected by the CPU itself.



Even the infrastructure operator cannot inspect:




  • the prompt

  • the model input

  • the output

  • the business logic



The system then returns:




  • the result

  • a hardware attestation proving what code actually ran



This creates something extremely important:




decisions agents can defend cryptographically




Example:




merchant defines refund policy
→ agent evaluates refund request inside TEE
→ signed decision returned
→ merchant policy never leaks






For a $0.10 ebook purchase, this is probably overkill.



For:




  • healthcare data

  • financial systems

  • enterprise automation

  • compliance workflows

  • trading systems



it becomes very important.









A real implementation: Coal



Over the last few months I've been building Coal.



Coal is a payment platform for autonomous software running on Base + 0G.



Instead of talking abstractly about the stack, here's the concrete implementation.



Coal does five things.









1. Hosts an agent-discoverable merchant catalog



Merchant catalogs live on 0G Storage.



Agents can discover products without:




  • API keys

  • dashboards

  • centralized marketplaces









2. Accepts both x402 and OKX APP





The same /verify endpoint accepts:




  • x402-v1

  • app-v2



The server advertises supported protocols and the agent picks whichever it supports.









3. Settles via Base USDC



Payments settle using USDC on Base.



The operator wallet relays transactions so agents never need ETH.



Typical confirmation time is around 2 seconds.









4. Anchors receipts on 0G



Every payment receipt gets:




  • uploaded to 0G Storage

  • anchored onto 0G Chain



Anyone can independently verify the proof trail.









5. Runs policy decisions inside TEEs



Refund checks, quotas, permissions, and policy evaluations run through 0G Compute Sealed Inference.



Merchant rules stay private from the model provider.









A concrete example



Open:




https://agent.usecoal.xyz






Ask the embedded agent:




"Buy me the 0G Builder's Cheatsheet"




The flow looks like this:




discover_merchants
→ find merchant catalog
→ pay_merchant
→ sign ERC-3009 authorization
→ facilitator submits transaction
→ receipt anchored on 0G
→ PDF unlocks






The payment is real USDC on Base.



No human clicks anything.









What's still broken



The stack works today.



But a lot is still rough.









Discovery is fragmented



There is no "Google for agent-payable services" yet.



Current discovery options are fragmented across:




  • ERC-8004 registries

  • MCP marketplaces

  • project-specific catalogs

  • Coinbase Bazaar

  • custom integrations



Agents still mostly rely on manually configured endpoints.



That does not scale long term.









Identity is immature



Agent reputation and trust scoring barely exist today.



A malicious agent and a high-quality agent can often look identical at the protocol layer.









Cross-chain UX is messy



Different payment ecosystems prefer different chains.



Agents increasingly need:




  • multiple wallets

  • multiple balances

  • cross-chain settlement paths



which reintroduces operational complexity.









Async billing is still early



The request/response model works well for instant resources.



It breaks down for:




  • long-running research

  • asynchronous workflows

  • large generation jobs



Session-based billing exists in specs but is still early in production SDKs.









TEE tooling is rough



The primitives are good.



The developer experience still feels early.



Attestation verification from TypeScript applications is still awkward and under-tooled.



It reminds me a lot of early Web3 tooling around 2018.









Why this matters



I think the important shift here is conceptual.



For years, "AI agents" mostly meant:




  • prompts

  • workflows

  • tool calling

  • orchestration



Now we're starting to see:




  • autonomous payments

  • machine-native identity

  • programmable commerce

  • verifiable decisions

  • cryptographic receipts



The infrastructure layer is finally catching up.









Try it yourself






Live agent sandbox






https://agent.usecoal.xyz






Runs Claude/Qwen with an embedded wallet capable of autonomous payments.









MCP server



Official MCP Registry

Smithery




https://mcp.usecoal.xyz/api/mcp






13 tools for:




  • discovery

  • payment

  • verification

  • downloads



Multi-tenant by design.

Every user passes their own wallet key.









Source code






https://github.com/emmanuel39hanks/coal






MIT licensed.



Includes:




  • x402 facilitator

  • APP v2 settlement flow

  • receipt anchoring

  • React SDK

  • MCP server

  • Base USDC integration






The autonomous internet needs more visible reference implementations and fewer speculative threads.



Hopefully this helps move the first category forward.

2. Cyber Threat Intelligence & Forensik

IoC Intelligence (2 Indikatoren)
agent[.]usecoal[.]xyzmcp[.]usecoal[.]xyz
CTI Threat Relationship Graph5 Knoten / 4 Relationen
CVE / Incident Software MITRE ATT&CK CWE Weakness IoC
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten Why AI agents still can't buy anything yet

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: agents, still, cant, anything · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

💬 Kommentare werden geladen…
Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
ZERO-DAY CVE-2026-102911 | A flaw has been found in zosmaai pi-llm-wiki up to 0.11.7. Affected is …
Advisory →
tsecurity.de Icon
Offline-Lesen, Eilmeldungen & 0ms Ladezeit

Installiere tsecurity.de direkt auf deinen Home-Bildschirm für das ultimative Vollbild-Magazinerlebnis ohne Browser-Leisten.

Nächster Beitrag