After failed delays, Apple files formal request with Supreme Court to review Epic case

The Supreme Court could now weigh in on the Apple versus Epic case where Apple was found in contempt of an injunction and forced to allow all developers to link externally without commission.


The Apple versus Epic saga is nowhere near an end even if Epic is celebrating a victory prematurely. Even as the case returns to Circuit Courts, Apple is requesting the Supreme Court to review two specific issues it has with the proceedings so far.

In the Supreme Court filing viewed by AppleInsider, Apple shares that the scope of the anti-steering injunction exceeds the District Court's limits set by CASA. It also argues that the injunction violation was issued in error due to suggesting it was violating the "spirit" of the law rather than the letter.


Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums

SecRule REQUEST_URI "@rx ..." "id:1001,phase:1,deny,status:403"

find /var/www -type f -name "*.php" -mmin -120

ss -tunp | grep -E ":(4444|1337|8080|9001)"

apt update && apt --only-upgrade install <pkg>

title: Detect Exploitation - After failed delays, Apple files formal request with Supreme Court to review Epic case
id: eba6bf0a-c823-4054-8d1d-ae09916eb2cb
status: experimental
description: Automatisch generierte SIEM-Erkennungsregel basierend auf CTI Intelligence
references:
  - https://tsecurity.de/
author: iShareStuff CTI Automated Detection Engine
date: 2026-09-24
logsource:
  category: network_connection
  product: any
detection:
  selection:
      CommandLine|contains:
        - 'exploit'
  condition: selection
falsepositives:
  - Legitime administrative Zugriffe oder Penetrationstests
level: high
tags:
  - attack.initial_access

rule CTI_Threat_Indicator {
    meta:
        author = "iShareStuff CTI Automated Detection Engine"
        date = "2026-09-24"
        description = "YARA Signature for "
    strings:
        $str = "After failed delays, Apple fil" ascii wide
    condition:
        any of them
}