Zum Hauptinhalt springen
•
Sichere ProgrammierungCoding-Agent Pi: Mehr Platz im Prompt, weniger Ballast(03.10.2026 um 08:20 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungES2026 Features Overview: Modern JavaScript for Developers(03.10.2026 um 08:30 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungFigma Dev Mode: 7 Proven Fixes for a Painful Dev Handoff(03.10.2026 um 08:30 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungUsando Raspberry Pi, rsync e inotify para um video wall de baixo custo(03.10.2026 um 08:30 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungLangGraph Tutorial: 5 Proven Steps to Fix a Fragile Agent(03.10.2026 um 08:30 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungFlash Loan Attack Vector Analysis: Lido(03.10.2026 um 08:32 Uhr)
••
Sichere Programmierung5 Halloween Costume Props to Print Before October 31(03.10.2026 um 08:33 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungWho Deletes Resources Created by a Kubernetes Operator?(03.10.2026 um 08:34 Uhr)
••
Sichere ProgrammierungCoding-Agent Pi: Mehr Platz im Prompt, weniger Ballast(03.10.2026 um 08:20 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungES2026 Features Overview: Modern JavaScript for Developers(03.10.2026 um 08:30 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungFigma Dev Mode: 7 Proven Fixes for a Painful Dev Handoff(03.10.2026 um 08:30 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungUsando Raspberry Pi, rsync e inotify para um video wall de baixo custo(03.10.2026 um 08:30 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungLangGraph Tutorial: 5 Proven Steps to Fix a Fragile Agent(03.10.2026 um 08:30 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungFlash Loan Attack Vector Analysis: Lido(03.10.2026 um 08:32 Uhr)
••
Sichere Programmierung5 Halloween Costume Props to Print Before October 31(03.10.2026 um 08:33 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungWho Deletes Resources Created by a Kubernetes Operator?(03.10.2026 um 08:34 Uhr)
•
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

Google Protocol Buffers flaw turns schemas into shells

A widely used JavaScript implementation of Google’s Protocol Buffers format is placing too much trust in untrusted data, exposing affected applications to r…

Beitrag
0
Seite
0
↗ Quelle (csoonline.com)
Social ReaktionenReagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!








A widely used JavaScript implementation of Google’s Protocol Buffers format is placing too much trust in untrusted data, exposing affected applications to remote code execution and other attacks.





Researchers at Cyera have disclosed six vulnerabilities affecting “protobuf.js,” all stemming from the library’s handling of schema and metadata. Attackers could exploit an input validation oversight to insert malicious data and influence an application’s behavior.





Protocol Buffers is a technology for packaging data in a compact, structured format to streamline the exchange of information between different applications. The protobuf.js library reportedly receives more than 50 million weekly downloads. It is commonly pulled into applications indirectly through dependencies such as gRPC tooling, Google Cloud libraries, and other frameworks, making it difficult for organizations to track.





Researchers disclosed six CVEs covering remote code execution, denial-of-service (DoS) conditions, prototype pollution, prototype injection, and code-generation issues.





“While exploitation of these vulnerabilities generally requires specific conditions, those conditions are increasingly common in data and AI ecosystems that routinely exchange data, schemas, and configuration files across services, repositories, cloud platforms, and third-party integrations,” Cyera researchers Assaf Morag and Vladimir Tokarev said in a blog post.





Patches are available for both protobuf.js and protonufjs-cli, the project’s command-line code generation tools.





Metadata capable of writing code





The most significant of the bugs is a code-generation flaw tracked as CVE-2026-44291.





According to Cyera, protobuf.js dynamically generates encoder and decoder functions and compiles them using JavaScript’s Function () constructor. Under specific conditions, an attacker can manipulate schema-derived information so that data intended to describe a message instead becomes executable code.





The researchers demonstrated an attack chain in which prototype pollution is used to trick protobuf.js into accepting attacker-controlled values as legitimate protobuf types. Those values are then incorporated into the generated code and executed within the Node.js process.





The impact extends beyond runtime applications. A separate code-injection issue, tracked as CVE-2026-44295, affects the pbjs command-line tool, where crafted schema names can be embedded into generated JavaScript files and executed when those files are later imported.





While successful exploitation requires specific preconditions, such as the ability to influence protobuf schemas or descriptors, researchers noted that modern software increasingly exchanges schemas, descriptors, and configuration files across repositories, cloud environments, APIs, and third-party integrations, making those assumptions less restrictive than they once were.





The remaining vulnerabilities are less severe. Researchers identified a prototype injection (CVE-2026-44292) flaw that can alter application behavior by tampering with inherited object properties, as well as denial-of-services (DoS) bugs (CVE-2026-44289, CVE-2026-44290, and CVE-2026-44294) that can crash or exhaust application resources using maliciously crafted inputs.





Patching advised as supply chain risk looms





The researchers noted that protobuf.js is often consumed as a transitive dependency, meaning organizations may be exposed without realizing the library is present in their software stack. As schemas move through automated development pipelines and software supply chains, components traditionally viewed as passive data can become a pathway for attacks.





“Development teams routinely accept code contributions, integrate third-party components, and automatically process files through CI/CD pipelines,” they explained. “We found that under certain conditions, a malicious protobuf schema could be introduced into this workflow and ultimately executed within trusted build environments.”





A compromise at this stage could have downstream impacts on products, customers, and business operations, they added.





The vulnerabilities affect protobuf.js versions 7.5.5 and earlier, along with versions 8.0.0 and 8.0.1, as well as vulnerable releases of protobuf.js-cli. Patches are available in protobuf.js 7.5.6 and 8.0.2, while protobuf.js-cli users are advised to upgrade to versions 1.2.1 or 2.0.2.


Cyber Threat Intelligence & Forensik

ATT&CK-Navigator · IoC-Radar · Exploit-Belege
IoC Intelligence
6 Indikatoren · Defanged · STIX 2.1
CVE-2026-44291CVE-2026-44295CVE-2026-44292CVE-2026-44289CVE-2026-44290CVE-2026-44294
CTI Threat Relationship Graph
Akteure · Techniken · Beziehungen
4 Knoten · 3 Relationen
CVE / Incident Threat Actor Software MITRE ATT&CK CWE Weakness IoC
Exploit & Remediation Lifecycle
PoC · Ausnutzung · Patch-Stufen
CVE-2026-44289
Entdeckung & Meldung
Schwachstelle identifiziert & registriert
Sicherheits-Advisory
Offizielle Warnung & CVE-Zuweisung
Exploit / PoC
Öffentlicher Nachweis/Code verfügbar (Exploit-DB/EUVD)
In-the-Wild Ausnutzung
Keine Massenausnutzung gemeldet
Patch & Schutzmaßnahmen
Upstream-Patch-Referenz vorhanden (Commit-/Advisory-Link)
Exploit Weaponization & PoC Radar
Nur belegte Faktoren · kein Score-Theater
CRITICAL WEAPONIZED · Index 75/100
Exploit-DB
Kein EDB-Eintrag
Interaktion
0-Click
Authentifizierung
Nicht erforderlich

Compliance, SLA & Vendor Adherence

Advisory-Prüfung · Score-Einordnung · Fristen
CVSS 7.5CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Impact: 3.6 | Exploitability: 3.89
AVN
Netzwerk (Remote)
Aus der Ferne über das Internet ohne Vorbedingungen exploitbar.
ACL
Niedrig (Low)
Wiederholbar und deterministisch ohne spezielle Race Conditions ausnutzbar.
PRN
Keine (Unauthenticated)
Vollständig unauthentifiziert ohne Benutzerkonto exploitbar.
UIN
Keine (Zero-Click)
Autonom ohne menschliches Zutun ausführbar (Zero-Click Exploitation).
SU
Unverändert (Scope Unchanged)
Auswirkungen verbleiben isoliert in der angreifbaren Anwendungskomponente.
CN
Keine
Teilweiser oder kein Datenabfluss.
IN
Keine
Teilweise oder keine Manipulation.
AH
Hoch (Totaler Ausfall / DoS)
Dienst oder Server wird komplett unbrauchbar (Denial of Service).
CISA-SSVC-Triage (vulnrichment)CVE-2026-44291
Exploitation: none (Keine bekannte Ausnutzung)Automatable: no (Nicht automatisierbar)Technical Impact: total (Vollständig)
Quelle: CISA-ADP vulnrichment · Stand 2026-05-13T15:31:57.317244Z · CISA Coordinator
Advisory Radar

Hersteller-Sicherheitsmeldungen & Patch-Status

In herstellerseitiger Prüfung
Handlungsempfehlung für Administratoren

Hersteller-Advisory noch nicht formal hinterlegt. Regelmäßiges Re-Scanning der CTI-Quellen anberaumt.

Referenzen aus der Primärquelle („Verifiziert" nur bei Hersteller-Domäne):
  • Upstream-Referenz (Code-Hosting, kein Advisory)
    github.com
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten Google Protocol Buffers flaw turns schemas into shells

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: Google, Protocol, Buffers, flaw · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

💬 Kommentare werden geladen…
Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
Nächster Beitrag