Author: Julian Goldie SEO - Bewertung: 1x - Views:31
Get the Agent OS & GLM System 👉 https://www.skool.com/ai-profit-lab-7462/about
Want to make money and save time with AI? Join here: https://www.skool.com/ai-profit-lab-7462/about
Video notes + links to the tools 👉 https://www.skool.com/ai-profit-lab-7462/about
Get a FREE AI Course + Community + 1,000 AI Agents 👉 https://www.skool.com/ai-seo-with-julian-goldie-1553/about
Get a FREE AI SEO Strategy Session → https://go.juliangoldie.com/strategy-session?utm=julian
Get 200+ Free AI SEO Prompts → https://go.juliangoldie.com/chat-gpt-prompts
Get out SEO link building book here 👉 https://go.juliangoldie.com/opt-in?utm=julian
GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8 (and Kimi K2.7): Side-by-Side Coding & Game Tests + Benchmarks
The video compares GLM 5.2 against Claude Opus 4.8 and Kimi K2.7 through side-by-side creative coding tests (raycaster engines, neon city flight, racing, solar system, voxel runner, liquid-in-a-bowl interaction, and landing pages) and discusses benchmark results and practical tradeoffs. Opus 4.8 generally produces smoother, more playable outputs and leads several tests, while GLM 5.2 wins some rounds (notably a labeled, interactive solar system, voxel runner, and the liquid demo) and scores #1 on Design Arena. The script emphasizes GLM 5.2 being MIT-licensed open source on Hugging Face and available via Ollama, cheaper on a coding plan, and easier to plug into agents via OAuth, while Claude is described as stronger overall but less flexible without paid API access. It also promotes an “agent operating system” and the AI Profit Boardroom community for setup files, tutorials, and coaching.
00:00 GLM 5.2 vs Claude
00:43 Open Source Advantages
02:12 Raycaster Showdown
03:21 Upgraded Raycaster
04:25 Neon City Flight
05:13 Racing And Solar
06:19 Voxel Runner Winner
07:13 Liquid Bowl Test
07:41 Benchmarks Breakdown
09:44 Landing Page Faceoff
10:15 Final Verdict
10:46 Agent OS Integration
11:17 Boardroom Pitch
13:19 Wrap Up
SOCIAL SHARE CARD GENERATOR