Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Echtzeit-Radar & Feeds
Alle RSS Feeds ➔
👥 Community & Social
•
Windows Tipps & SecurityPC-WELT 11/2026 am Kiosk: Windows Fehler Check 2027(02.10.2026 um 10:45 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungThe Day Your AI Goes Rogue(02.10.2026 um 10:30 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungWhat If the Developer Internet Had a TV? 📺(02.10.2026 um 10:31 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungLLMjacking and the Hidden Cost of a Stolen API Key(02.10.2026 um 10:31 Uhr)
••
AI & KI NachrichtenJev is the if statement of AI(02.10.2026 um 10:35 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungCrowdwide is ALMOST DONE!! WOOOHOOO!! 🎉🚀(02.10.2026 um 10:35 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungAgentRisk: A Pay-Per-Call Risk Oracle for Autonomous Trading Agents(02.10.2026 um 10:38 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungLint your agent tasks before anyone claims them(02.10.2026 um 10:38 Uhr)
••
Windows Tipps & SecurityPC-WELT 11/2026 am Kiosk: Windows Fehler Check 2027(02.10.2026 um 10:45 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungThe Day Your AI Goes Rogue(02.10.2026 um 10:30 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungWhat If the Developer Internet Had a TV? 📺(02.10.2026 um 10:31 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungLLMjacking and the Hidden Cost of a Stolen API Key(02.10.2026 um 10:31 Uhr)
••
AI & KI NachrichtenJev is the if statement of AI(02.10.2026 um 10:35 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungCrowdwide is ALMOST DONE!! WOOOHOOO!! 🎉🚀(02.10.2026 um 10:35 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungAgentRisk: A Pay-Per-Call Risk Oracle for Autonomous Trading Agents(02.10.2026 um 10:38 Uhr)
•
Sichere ProgrammierungLint your agent tasks before anyone claims them(02.10.2026 um 10:38 Uhr)
•
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

How to Generate Cryptographic Proof of AI Agent Authorization (EU AI Act Article 14)

How to Generate Cryptographic Proof of AI Agent Authorization for EU AI Act Article 14 Compliance EU AI Act Article 14 enforcement starts August 2, 2026. If…

Beitrag
0
Seite
0
↗ Quelle (dev.to)
Social ReaktionenReagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!




How to Generate Cryptographic Proof of AI Agent Authorization for EU AI Act Article 14 Compliance



EU AI Act Article 14 enforcement starts August 2, 2026. If you're building AI agents that access sensitive data, process customer information, or make autonomous decisions — you need to demonstrate human oversight with verifiable artifacts.



Not logs. Not observability traces. Cryptographic proof.



In this post, I'll show you how we built Verigate — a cryptographic trust infrastructure for AI agents — and how you can use it to generate tamper-evident authorization receipts that any auditor can verify offline.



This content was created for the Build with Gemini XPRIZE.









The Problem



Every AI agent platform today — LangChain, CrewAI, Google ADK, Zapier AI — lets agents take actions. But none of them produce independently verifiable proof that the action was authorized according to policy.



When your agent:




  • Reads customer PII from a database

  • Sends an email on behalf of a user

  • Processes a refund

  • Modifies a CRM record



...what evidence exists that this action was authorized? A database log? That can be modified. An observability trace? That's vendor-dependent. A timestamp? That proves when, not whether.



Article 14 of the EU AI Act requires deployers to demonstrate five capabilities:




  1. Understand the AI system's capabilities and limitations

  2. Monitor the system's operation

  3. Interpret outputs correctly

  4. Override or stop the system

  5. Record what happened and prove it



That fifth requirement is where most teams fail. You need artifacts that are:





  • Independently verifiable — without trusting the system that produced them


  • Tamper-evident — modification is detectable


  • Immutable — can't be retroactively altered









The Architecture: Ed25519 + SHA-256 + Merkle + Base L2



Here's how Verigate solves this:






Step 1: Every Agent Action Gets a Signed Receipt



When an agent requests authorization, the gateway evaluates policy rules (allowlist, resource scope, rate limit) and produces an Ed25519-signed receipt:




{
"body": {
"v": "1",
"seq": "42",
"ts": "2026-06-26T10:30:00Z",
"request_digest": "sha256:0e6d5b86f01f...",
"policy_version": "sha256:d59a1e4171e6...",
"decision": "approve",
"reasons": [],
"prev_receipt": "sha256:b3f51c8824bc..."
},
"sig": {
"alg": "EdDSA",
"kid": "gateway-prod-a1b2c3d4",
"value": "7WiFneT3tLRtE2Iztm..."
},
"receipt_hash": "sha256:2a3e65a3ade468..."
}






Key properties:





  • Ed25519 (EdDSA) signature — no HS256, no symmetric keys, no shared secrets


  • SHA-256 action digest — the intent (agent_id + action + resource) is canonicalized via RFC 8785 JCS before hashing


  • Policy version hash — proves which policy was active when the decision was made






Step 2: Receipts Are Hash-Chained



Each receipt's prev_receipt field contains the SHA-256 hash of the previous receipt. This creates a tamper-evident chain:




Receipt #1 (genesis) → prev: sha256:0000...0000
Receipt #2 → prev: sha256(Receipt #1)
Receipt #3 → prev: sha256(Receipt #2)
...






Modify any receipt in the chain, and every subsequent prev_receipt hash becomes invalid. Insert or delete a receipt, and the sequence numbers break.






Step 3: Merkle Tree with Inclusion Proofs



Receipt hashes are organized into a Merkle tree using domain-separated hashing:




Leaf:  SHA256("BI_RECEIPT_LEAF_V1" || 0x00 || receipt_hash)
Node: SHA256("BI_RECEIPT_NODE_V1" || 0x00 || left || right)






This lets you prove a specific receipt is included in a batch without downloading all receipts. The /v1/engine/merkle/proof endpoint returns the sibling hashes and directions.






Step 4: On-Chain Anchoring (Base L2)



For regulated industries, the Merkle root can be anchored on Base mainnet (chain ID 8453) as transaction calldata:




Anchor TX → burn address (0x000...000)
Value: 0
Calldata: 32-byte Merkle root






This creates an immutable timestamp proving the receipt chain existed at a specific block height. Verifiable on BaseScan by anyone, forever.









Zero LLM in the Authorization Path



Here's what makes this architecture unique: the authorization decision is fully deterministic. No AI model can influence whether an action is allowed or denied. The policy engine evaluates three rule types:





  1. Allowlist — is this action in the permitted set?


  2. Resource Scope — is this resource in the permitted scope?


  3. Rate Limit — has this agent exceeded its quota?



All three must pass. Any failure → deny.



Gemini (via Vertex AI) powers six AI agents that sit outside the authorization path:





  • Auditor — analyzes receipt chains against OWASP and NIST frameworks


  • Recommender — proposes policy changes from CONFLICT patterns


  • Investigator — synthesizes incident reports


  • Coordinator — manages A2A agent discovery


  • Isolator — quarantines agents on HIGH/CRITICAL incidents


  • Onboarding/Support/Marketing — business operations



The security boundary is explicit: AI advises, the gateway decides.









Try It: 5-Minute Integration






Install and authorize your first action:






from sdk import Verigate

# Provision a tenant (or use an existing API key)
vg = Verigate(api_key="as_...")

# Register your agent
vg.register_agent("my-bot", name="My Bot", capabilities=["read", "query"])

# Authorize an action
result = vg.authorize("my-bot", action="read", resource="/data/users")
print(f"Decision: {result.decision}")
print(f"Receipt: {result.receipt_hash}")

# Verify the chain
chain = vg.verify_chain()
print(f"Chain valid: {chain['valid']}")









Generate a compliance report:






report = vg.generate_compliance_report(
agent_name="my-bot",
agent_description="Reads customer profiles from staging database",
capabilities=["read", "query"],
data_types=["PII", "customer_records"],
frameworks=["EU AI Act", "HIPAA", "SOC 2"],
)
print(f"Findings: {len(report.findings)}")
# Download PDF: GET /v1/compliance/report/{report.report_id}/pdf









Or use the MCP server with Claude Desktop:






{
"mcpServers": {
"verigate": {
"command": "python",
"args": ["/path/to/mcp_server.py"],
"env": { "VERIGATE_API_KEY": "as_..." }
}
}
}






56 tools available — authorize, verify, register agents/resources/actions, generate compliance reports, chat with the multi-agent system.









Free Quick-Scan



Not ready to commit? Try the free compliance quick-scan — describe your agent and get 3 EU AI Act findings in 30 seconds. No signup required.



Full report with all 6 frameworks (EU AI Act, HIPAA, SOC 2, DORA, NIST AI RMF, OWASP LLM Top 10): $299 one-time.










Built with Google Gemini 2.5 (Vertex AI), Google ADK 2.1, Cloud Run, and Firestore.






BuildWithGemini #GeminiXPRIZE

🔍 CTI & Forensik

Cyber Threat Intelligence & Forensik

Bedrohungsgraph · ATT&CK-Mapping · Exploit-Belege
CTI Threat Relationship Graph
Akteure · Techniken · Beziehungen
2 Knoten · 1 Relationen
CVE / Incident Threat Actor Software MITRE ATT&CK CWE Weakness IoC
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten How to Generate Cryptographic Proof of AI Agent Authorization (EU AI Act Article 14)

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: Generate, Cryptographic, Proof, Agent · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

💬 Kommentare werden geladen…
Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
tsecurity.de Icon
Offline-Lesen, Eilmeldungen & 0ms Ladezeit

Installiere tsecurity.de direkt auf deinen Home-Bildschirm für das ultimative Vollbild-Magazinerlebnis ohne Browser-Leisten.

Nächster Beitrag