A while back I wrote about 64% of our merged PRs being written by AI. A few people (reasonably) asked: "nice story, but can I verify any of that?"
So we put it on a public, auto-updating dashboard:
👉 www.codens.ai/stats/en
It shows, for our GitHub organization:
What % of merged PRs are authored by AI agents (currently 65%)
Median time from PR-open to merge (2 minutes)
Who merged what — task-execution agents vs maintenance bots vs auto-fix vs humans
Weekly AI-merge counts and a per-repository breakdown
Every number is tallied straight from the GitHub API by a small collector script, and the page regenerates itself weekly. We can't inflate it — it's measured, and the down weeks show up too (that's kind of the point).
Why bother making it public
Two reasons.
1. "Trust me bro" doesn't scale. When you claim most of your code is AI-written, the only honest move is to expose the raw counts so anyone can sanity-check them. The dashboard is that receipt.
2. It's a live dogfooding test. The whole thing — the PRD, the implementation, the review, the auto-fix on production errors — runs on Codens, our own AI dev-automation suite. If our own numbers ever tanked, the dashboard would be the first place it'd show. Public accountability is a good forcing function.
Funny footnote: the dashboard itself was code-reviewed by our own AI reviewer before it shipped, and it caught two real bugs — an OG-image percentage that had drifted out of sync with the live number, and a broken error-fallback that would have blanked the page on malformed data. The tool built to sell "AI reviews your PRs" reviewed the PR that announces it. We'll take it.
If you want to see the same machinery on your repos, there's a 14-day free trial (no card): codens.ai. Japanese version of the dashboard is here.
SOCIAL SHARE CARD GENERATOR