Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Echtzeit-Radar & Feeds
Alle RSS Feeds ➔
👥 Community & Social
••••••••
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)CVE-2025-65823 | Meatmeet App on Android hard-coded credentials(29.09.2026 um 03:42 Uhr)
••••••••••
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)CVE-2025-65823 | Meatmeet App on Android hard-coded credentials(29.09.2026 um 03:42 Uhr)
••
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

What 1,000 invoices a month actually costs across five document-AI APIs

Pricing pages for document-extraction APIs are written to win a different comparison than the one you actually need. Per-page rates hide minimums. Credit systems hide per-document math. So here's the arithmetic for one concrete, boring…

0
↗ Quelle (dev.to)
Reagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!

Pricing pages for document-extraction APIs are written to win a different comparison than the

one you actually need. Per-page rates hide minimums. Credit systems hide per-document math.

So here's the arithmetic for one concrete, boring workload: 1,000 single-page invoices a

month
, at each vendor's published July-2026 pricing. (I sell one of these APIs — disclosure

at the bottom — but every number here is from the vendor's own pricing page.)






The table


















































API Published rate 1,000 invoices/mo The catch
AWS Textract (AnalyzeExpense) $0.01/page $10 You build the pipeline: retries, failures, schema mapping. Every attempt bills, including failed ones.
Google Document AI (Invoice parser) $0.01/page $10 Same deal. (Their Bank Statement parser is $0.75/classified doc.)
Azure Document Intelligence (prebuilt) $0.01/page $10 Same again — the hyperscalers are interchangeable here.
LlamaParse $1.25/1k pages ~$1.25 It's a parser, not an extractor: structure back, not validated invoice fields. Budget your own extraction layer (and its LLM bill) on top.
Veryfi $0.16/invoice
$160 — except no. Production starts at a $500/mo minimum buying <5k docs
At 1,000 invoices your effective rate is $0.50/doc, not $0.16.
Kynth Core (mine) $0.08/invoice $80 Charged only when extraction succeeds; no minimum, no commitment.





The three questions that actually price this category



1. What does a failure cost? The per-page APIs bill per attempt. If your docs are ugly —

photographed receipts, scanned faxes, tables that explode — your effective

per-successful-document rate is higher than the sticker. That's why "cost per correctly

extracted document" (price ÷ accuracy) is the only number worth comparing, and why I publish

a reproducible accuracy benchmark alongside this post — including the suites where the

hyperscalers beat me.



2. What does the minimum cost? Veryfi's per-doc rates look adjacent to mine until the

commitment line. Minimums are a bet the vendor makes you place on your own volume. Process

800 invoices a month and you're paying for 5,000.



3. Who owns the pipeline? $10/month at Textract is real if your engineering time is free.

The hyperscaler APIs hand you fields; everything around them — schema validation, retries,

normalization, the 3am alert when a new invoice layout breaks parsing — is yours.






Disclosure and receipts



Kynth Core is my product, so weight my row accordingly. What I can offer instead of

neutrality is reproducibility: the accuracy benchmark behind these claims is an MIT-licensed

harness (public datasets, pinned revisions, raw responses committed, fork-safe CI) — re-run

every number with your own keys, or re-score my committed responses with no keys at all.

Links: benchmark repo ·

live scores ·

pricing sources.

2. Cyber Threat Intelligence & Forensik

CTI Threat Relationship Graph2 Knoten / 1 Relationen
CVE / Incident Software MITRE ATT&CK CWE Weakness IoC
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten What 1,000 invoices a month actually costs across five document-AI APIs

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: What, 1000, invoices, month · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

💬 Kommentare werden geladen…
Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
ZERO-DAY CVE-2026-102265 | PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.13…
Advisory →
tsecurity.de Icon
Offline-Lesen, Eilmeldungen & 0ms Ladezeit

Installiere tsecurity.de direkt auf deinen Home-Bildschirm für das ultimative Vollbild-Magazinerlebnis ohne Browser-Leisten.

Nächster Beitrag