Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Windows Tipps & SecurityWindows-Zertifikate laufen ab: Wer bald handeln muss(09.10.2026 um 19:20 Uhr)
•
Unix & Linux ServerSecurity: Denial of Service in perl-DBI (Red Hat)(09.10.2026 um 08:26 Uhr)
•
Unix & Linux ServerSecurity: Zwei Probleme in dracut (Red Hat)(09.10.2026 um 08:26 Uhr)
•
Unix & Linux ServerSecurity: Denial of Service in libde265 (Ubuntu)(09.10.2026 um 08:26 Uhr)
•
Unix & Linux ServerSecurity: Mehrere Probleme in BlueZ (Ubuntu)(09.10.2026 um 20:01 Uhr)
••••••
Windows Tipps & SecurityWindows-Zertifikate laufen ab: Wer bald handeln muss(09.10.2026 um 19:20 Uhr)
•
Unix & Linux ServerSecurity: Denial of Service in perl-DBI (Red Hat)(09.10.2026 um 08:26 Uhr)
•
Unix & Linux ServerSecurity: Zwei Probleme in dracut (Red Hat)(09.10.2026 um 08:26 Uhr)
•
Unix & Linux ServerSecurity: Denial of Service in libde265 (Ubuntu)(09.10.2026 um 08:26 Uhr)
•
Unix & Linux ServerSecurity: Mehrere Probleme in BlueZ (Ubuntu)(09.10.2026 um 20:01 Uhr)
••••••
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

CloudSEK CTF Writeup

CloudSEK CTF was a fun and technically enriching challenge set covering scripting automation, web vulnerabilities, Android OSINT, JWT manipulation, and…

Beitrag
0
Seite
0
↗ Quelle (infosecwriteups.com)
Social ReaktionenReagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!

CloudSEK CTF was a fun and technically enriching challenge set covering scripting automation, web vulnerabilities, Android OSINT, JWT manipulation, and authentication bypass techniques. This write-up documents my approach and methodology for the challenges I solved.

  1. Nitro
    Nitro 100 Ready your scripts! Only automation will beat the clock
    and unlock the flag. http://15.206.47.5:9090

Method:
Random string on http://15.206.47.5:9090/task :
Here is the input string: Vr9jz8d13k6K
Things need to don in script:
Reverse the string ,encode with base64, wrap it in the given format
and submit the string.

import requests
import base64
import re

BASE = "http://15.206.47.5:9090"
session = requests.Session()

TOKEN_REGEX = re.compile(r"input string:\s*([A-Za-z0-9+/=]+)")

def extract_token(html):
m = TOKEN_REGEX.search(html)
if not m:
raise ValueError("Token not found")
return m.group(1)

def build_payload(s):
rev = s[::-1]
b64 = base64.b64encode(rev.encode()).decode()
return f"CSK__{b64}__2025"

print("[*] Automation loop started...")

while True:
try:
r_task = session.get(f"{BASE}/task", timeout=3)
token = extract_token(r_task.text)
payload = build_payload(token)

r_submit = session.post(f"{BASE}/submit", data=payload, timeout=3)

print("Token:", token)
print("Response:", r_submit.text.strip())
print("-" * 40)

if "flag" in r_submit.text.lower():
print("FLAG FOUND!")
break
except Exception as e:
print("Error:", e)

Got the flag.

2. Bad Feedback:

Method:The data in feedback form is sent in xml and client side js script is
visible. So I got the idea that this can be vulnerable to xml
injection. I tested it with a simple payload.

Got the flag using this payload.

3. Ticket:
Strike Bank recently discovered unusual activity in their
customer portal. During a routine review of their Android app,
several clues were uncovered. Your mission is to investigate
the information available, explore the associated portal, and
uncover the hidden flag. Everything you need is already out
there! Connect the dots and complete the challenge.
The android package is com.strikebank.netbanking and the
security review was conducted via bevigil.com.
Report can also be viewed by visiting the URL with the
following format: https://bevigil.com/report/<package_name>
Method:
Report: https://bevigil.com/report/com.strikebank.netbanking
Explore the report to get the url of the Vulnerable
website(Strike Bank).
Website — 15.206.47.5.nip.io

Exploring strings we got the jwt secret and default
credentials .
Username — tuhin1729
Password: 123456

After logging with these credentials I got a jwt token assigned
to tuhin1729 user. I replaced the jwt token with a custom
made jwt token. And got the flag.

4.​Triangle
The system guards its secrets behind a username, a
password, and three sequential verification steps. Only those
who truly understand how the application works will pass all
three.
Explore carefully. Look for what others overlooked. Break the
Trinity and claim the flag.
http://15.206.47.5:8080
Method:

As i have to bypass this login portal i start with sql injection
but after trying sql injection and roaming around in website
code i see an html comment for Dev Team 2 that to make
changes in google2fa.php file and remove .bak file.
I tried to access http://15.206.47.5:8080/google2fa.php but
didn’t get the file then i tried
http://15.206.47.5:8080/google2fa.php.bak and got the bak
file. ​
Then I also got the login.php.bak file which has the php
code.

From the login.php.bak file I got the username and password
which is admin and admin.
The google2fa.php.bak has logic that shows how the otp is
generated .
​
By reviewing the code I tried payload to bypass the otp login
functionality, as it compares the otp which is generated using
google2fa.php.
I tried “00000” as otp but it didn’t work. Then I tried sending blank fields
request that also didn’t work, then I tried “true” as OTP which works and
led us to our flag.

Thanks for reading:)


CloudSEK CTF Writeup was originally published in InfoSec Write-ups on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

🔍 CTI & Forensik

Cyber Threat Intelligence & Forensik

ATT&CK-Navigator · IoC-Radar · Exploit-Belege
MITRE ATT&CK Matrix Navigator
1 belegte Technik
T1190TA0001 · Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application
Mitigation: M1042 Network Segmentation & WAF Rule Enforcement
Quelle: Kontext-Klassifikation des Artikeltextes
Initial Access
IoC Intelligence
1 Indikatoren · Defanged · STIX 2.1
15[.]206[.]47[.]5
CTI Threat Relationship Graph
Akteure · Techniken · Beziehungen
7 Knoten · 6 Relationen
CVE / Incident Threat Actor Software MITRE ATT&CK CWE Weakness IoC
Intelligence Digest — kostenlos Täglich die wichtigsten Security-News · jederzeit abbestellbar
Community Rating & Social Proof
⭐ Leser-Wertung
–
Ø / 5.0
Noch keine Leser-Bewertungen
War diese Seite hilfreich?
0
Jetzt Bewertung abgeben
🟢 Niedrig (1-3.9) 🟡 Mittel (4.0-6.9) 🔴 Hoch (7.0-8.9) Kritisch (9.0-10.0)

Verwandte Story-Cluster & Quellen (Vektor-KI)

Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten CloudSEK CTF Writeup

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: CloudSEK, Writeup · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

💬 Kommentare werden geladen…
Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
Nächster Beitrag