This Chinese AI Model Is SCARY Good

Author: Julian Goldie SEO - Bewertung: 6x - Views:76

Get the Agent OS & Qwen Masterclass 👉 https://www.skool.com/ai-profit-lab-7462/about



Want to make money and save time with AI? Join here: https://www.skool.com/ai-profit-lab-7462/about



Video notes + links to the tools 👉 https://www.skool.com/ai-profit-lab-7462/about



Get a FREE AI Course + Community + 1,000 AI Agents 👉 https://www.skool.com/ai-seo-with-julian-goldie-1553/about



Get a FREE AI SEO Strategy Session → https://go.juliangoldie.com/strategy-session?utm=julian



Get 200+ Free AI SEO Prompts → https://go.juliangoldie.com/chat-gpt-prompts



Get out SEO link building book here 👉 https://go.juliangoldie.com/opt-in?utm=julian



A Chinese lab claimed 2.4 trillion parameters and second place only to Fable 5 — so I ran 14 identical builds through Qwen 3.8 Max, Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 to see if the number held up.



It didn't hold up the way the headlines said: one model wins gameplay, another wins interface, and a model almost nobody was talking about quietly beat all three on a public developer leaderboard. Every test, every failure point, and the five checks I run before building a workflow around any model.



00:00 The 2.4 Trillion Parameter Claim

01:15 Big Claim, No Receipts

02:01 Head-to-Head: Where Qwen Wins

03:20 Where It Breaks Down

06:37 The Model That Actually Won

07:43 5 Rules Before You Commit