https://arena.ai/agent
Google's new model, Gemini 4 Carbon, put through a long run of 3D generations, creative prompts, visual explainers and UI tasks, compared against Gemini 4 Argon, Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol, Muse Wonderful, Kimi and DeepSeek.
Peter’s prompts:
https://github.com/petergpt/3d-prompt-collection
- Carbon is a clear step up from Gemini 4 Argon, with more detail and a nicer look
- Claude Opus 5.5 puts in more detail and flourish, but in the first test it cost $27.50 vs $2.70 for Carbon
- Carbon is more creative and dynamic than GPT-6.1 Sol, but Sol is more complete and precise - Carbon beats Muse Wonderful and Kimi in these tests
- Verdict: a good improvement, and solidly in the top three
0:00 Intro: Gemini 4 Carbon
0:15 First test (White House): Carbon vs Argon
1:28 Carbon vs Claude Opus 5.5
2:42 Carbon vs GPT-6.1 Sol
3:06 Carbon vs Muse Wonderful and Kimi
3:48 Why test with 3D generations
4:45 Playable 3D game: Carbon, Argon, Sol, Opus
6:28 Where Carbon falls short: gaps in detail
7:50 Stonehenge
8:30 Golden Gate Bridge
10:41 Golden Gate Bridge: GPT-6.1 Sol comparison
11:53 Carbon's creativity
15:33 Monet paintings transition
18:37 Van Gogh paintings world
21:47 Why creativity matters in a model
23:30 Another 3D prompt: Carbon vs Opus, Sol, Muse, DeepSeek
26:27 London through the ages
29:56 Istanbul
31:44 Harbin ice city
33:20 New test: visual explainers (how lightning works)
35:34 John Snow and the cholera map
38:20 UI work
39:45 Golden Gate Bridge completion animation
40:43 More UI generations
41:55 Ski resort site and ramen ordering
44:20 Verdict
#Gemini #AI #LLM #arenaai
Google's new model, Gemini 4 Carbon, put through a long run of 3D generations, creative prompts, visual explainers and UI tasks, compared against Gemini 4 Argon, Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol, Muse Wonderful, Kimi and DeepSeek.
Peter’s prompts:
https://github.com/petergpt/3d-prompt-collection
- Carbon is a clear step up from Gemini 4 Argon, with more detail and a nicer look
- Claude Opus 5.5 puts in more detail and flourish, but in the first test it cost $27.50 vs $2.70 for Carbon
- Carbon is more creative and dynamic than GPT-6.1 Sol, but Sol is more complete and precise - Carbon beats Muse Wonderful and Kimi in these tests
- Verdict: a good improvement, and solidly in the top three
0:00 Intro: Gemini 4 Carbon
0:15 First test (White House): Carbon vs Argon
1:28 Carbon vs Claude Opus 5.5
2:42 Carbon vs GPT-6.1 Sol
3:06 Carbon vs Muse Wonderful and Kimi
3:48 Why test with 3D generations
4:45 Playable 3D game: Carbon, Argon, Sol, Opus
6:28 Where Carbon falls short: gaps in detail
7:50 Stonehenge
8:30 Golden Gate Bridge
10:41 Golden Gate Bridge: GPT-6.1 Sol comparison
11:53 Carbon's creativity
15:33 Monet paintings transition
18:37 Van Gogh paintings world
21:47 Why creativity matters in a model
23:30 Another 3D prompt: Carbon vs Opus, Sol, Muse, DeepSeek
26:27 London through the ages
29:56 Istanbul
31:44 Harbin ice city
33:20 New test: visual explainers (how lightning works)
35:34 John Snow and the cholera map
38:20 UI work
39:45 Golden Gate Bridge completion animation
40:43 More UI generations
41:55 Ski resort site and ramen ordering
44:20 Verdict
#Gemini #AI #LLM #arenaai