Zum Hauptinhalt springen
••••••••••••••••••••
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

The Linux Foundation: Who Watches the Watcher? Hardening eBPF in Production Security Deployments - Hanshal Mehta, Self

HD Video
Who Watches the Watcher? Hardening eBPF in Production Security Deployments - Hanshal Mehta, Self
Video abspielen

Video von The Linux Foundation auf YouTube: Join us at the premier vendor-neutral open source conference, where developers and technologists come together to…

Beitrag
0
Seite
0
↗ Quelle (The Linux Foundation)
Social ReaktionenReagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!

Join us at the premier vendor-neutral open source conference, where developers and technologists come together to collaborate, share knowledge, and explore the latest innovations and advancements in open source technology. Learn more at https://events.linuxfoundation.org/



Who Watches the Watcher? Hardening eBPF in Production Security Deployments - Hanshal Mehta, Self



eBPF has become the backbone of modern Linux security tooling. Cilium, Tetragon, Falco, etc they all depend on eBPF's ability to hook kernel execution paths and enforce policy without a kernel patch or reboot. But there's a question the community has been slow to ask: who secures eBPF itself?

Working on bpfman, an eBPF program manager, exposed me to the trust assumptions baked into how programs get loaded, pinned, and granted kernel access. This talk covers what I found concrete attack surfaces that show up in real deployments, not theory.



We'll cover: the verifier's historical CVEs and what they reveal about its actual threat model, privilege escalation through CAP_BPF and unprivileged eBPF in distros that ship with it enabled, what program signing protects and what it quietly doesn't, and LSM hooks on BPF program loading that most teams aren't using yet.

The second half: BPF token scoping, how Ubuntu and Fedora are locking down the attack surface without breaking legitimate tooling,and a threat model checklist you can apply to your own eBPF deployment the same week.

If you're running eBPF-based security tooling in production, this is the talk I wished existed before I started.
🔍 CTI & Forensik

Cyber Threat Intelligence & Forensik

ATT&CK-Navigator · IoC-Radar · Exploit-Belege
MITRE ATT&CK Matrix Navigator
1 belegte Technik
T1068TA0004 · Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation
Mitigation: M1026 Privileged Account Management & Patching
Quelle: Kontext-Klassifikation des Artikeltextes · Konfidenz 90%
Patch-Stand prüfen, privilegierte Konten beschränken, sudo-/polkit-Regeln härten.
Privilege Escalation
CTI Threat Relationship Graph
Akteure · Techniken · Beziehungen
4 Knoten · 3 Relationen
CVE / Incident Threat Actor Software MITRE ATT&CK CWE Weakness IoC
Intelligence Digest — kostenlos Täglich die wichtigsten Security-News · jederzeit abbestellbar
Community Rating & Social Proof
⭐ Leser-Wertung
–
Ø / 5.0
Noch keine Leser-Bewertungen
War diese Seite hilfreich?
0
Jetzt Bewertung abgeben
🟢 Niedrig (1-3.9) 🟡 Mittel (4.0-6.9) 🔴 Hoch (7.0-8.9) Kritisch (9.0-10.0)

Verwandte Story-Cluster & Quellen (Vektor-KI)

2 Quellen
Challenges Using an IEC Standard in Open Source - Nico Rikken, OSPO member, Alliander
1 weitere Quelle
Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
Nächster Beitrag