🕵️ SicherheitslückenCVE-2026-8070 | ASUS Armoury Crate up to 6.4.12 permission assignment(17.09.2026 um 13:05 Uhr)
🕵️ SicherheitslückenCVE-2026-8919 | ASUS GameSDK up to 1.0.5 Web cross-domain policy(17.09.2026 um 13:05 Uhr)
🕵️ Reverse EngineeringHow Candidates Could Use AI for Good(17.09.2026 um 13:06 Uhr)
🕵️ SicherheitslückenCVE-2026-8070 | ASUS Armoury Crate up to 6.4.12 permission assignment(17.09.2026 um 13:05 Uhr)
🕵️ SicherheitslückenCVE-2026-8919 | ASUS GameSDK up to 1.0.5 Web cross-domain policy(17.09.2026 um 13:05 Uhr)
🕵️ Reverse EngineeringHow Candidates Could Use AI for Good(17.09.2026 um 13:06 Uhr)
📰 IT Security Nachrichten 🕛 vor 7 Jahren 2 Min Lesezeit SECURITY-FEED
0

Feds Told Tesla To Stop Making 'Misleading Statements' On Model 3 Safety

↗ Quelle (tech.slashdot.org)
🗣️ Stimme:
Last October, Tesla said that its Model 3 had the "lowest probability of injury of any vehicle ever tested by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)." Two days later, the agency responded without naming Tesla by saying that its "5-star rating is the highest safety rating a vehicle can achieve," but that it "does not distinguish safety performance beyond that rating, thus there is no 'safest' vehicle among those vehicles achieving 5-star ratings." Now, according to Ars Technica, citing documents obtained by the website Plainsite, we have learned that the NHTSA told Tesla to stop making "misleading statements" about the Model 3's safety, as the company's use of NHTSA's 5-star ratings and associated data "is inconsistent with the NHTSA's guidelines." From the report: The NHTSA conducts a number of different crash tests for each vehicle and then issues a series of ratings ranging from one to five stars for different aspects of vehicle safety. There's no disputing that the Model 3 performed well on these tests, achieving five stars -- the agency's highest rating -- across the board. The NHTSA would have liked Tesla to stop there. Instead, Tesla dug into the NHTSA's data and spotted an opportunity to further toot its own horn. As part of its evaluation process, the NHTSA calculates a number called a vehicle safety score, which the agency has characterized as "relative risk of injury." The agency then awards each vehicle a star rating based on VSS ranges.

Tesla noticed that the Model 3 had a better VSS score than any other vehicle on the market. That, in Tesla's view, means that a Model 3 driver is less likely to be injured in a crash than a driver of any other vehicle. But the NHTSA argues that this is statistical malpractice because it doesn't take into account vehicle weight. In a vehicle-to-vehicle crash, the occupant of the heavier vehicle is less likely to be injured. The NHTSA's tests, which involve crashing a car into fixed objects, don't necessarily account for this difference. Tesla says it stands by the statements it made last October.
Wie bewertest du diesen Beitrag?
1 Klick Feedback
Teilen mit Netzwerk & Team:
Community Threat-Level Barometer
Live Votum

Wie stufst du das Risiko dieser Schwachstelle / Bedrohung für dein Unternehmen ein?

Noch keine Stimmen — schätze das Risiko als Erster ein.

Community-Analysen & Experten-Meinungen 0

Verfasse deine eigene Analyse, teile Workarounds oder diskutiere diesen Vorfall im Blog.
Noch keine Community-Analyse verfasst. Markiere einen Textabschnitt oder klicke oben auf Eigene Analyse verfassen“!
Community Pulse: Relevanz-Einschätzung
1 Klick Experten-Votum
🔴 Akute Relevanz 0%
🟡 In Evaluierung 0%
🟢 Keine Auswirkung 0%
Spannende Innovation 0%
Verwandte Story-Cluster & Quellen (Vektor-KI)
Port 8095 Engine
1 Quelle
Update-Panne bei Microsoft: Windows-11-Update sperrt Nutzer aus Domänen aus
1 Quelle
Chips und mehr: Huawei hat einen Plan für die Konkurrenz mit Nvidia
1 Quelle
Neunjähriger gibt 118.000 Dollar aus, um YouTube-Kanal zu bewerben