📚 People should realize that comparing a FREE software to a proprietary one , doesn't mean they should be on the same quality level , it's not even logical !

Comparing a free software you didn't pay for with a premium one that's predicted to deliver a quality service and making negative reviews of the former because it's not on the same grounds with the latter doesn't make any sense imo.

If you didn't pay a single buck for it , why did you expect it to be packed with the same features like the proprietary ?!

I mean people who bash FOSS to be lacking quality (Not bad quality because they tried it for free) should calm their rant down and just dual-boot to their second-favourite proprietary platform and pay the monthly subscription for their favourite software there ....... Problem solved.

Being nit-picky about quality/features is not really beneficial considering that FOSS can offer most features (If not all) of the proprietary one and for FREE , then people just complain about it for different (And sometimes stupid) reasons like: "It's GUI is not familiar , THAT'S TERRIBLE" or "It's confusing to use !" ........

It's just these people either were having over-the-top ambitions or didn't even pay for the proprietary software at all .... That's why they jump for the verdict directly without looking at the biggest premise , the price tag !

If devs. giving their effort for free to you with acceptable quality is not fulfilling ...... then the real problem wasn't the lack of features from the beginning.