🎯 CVE-2021-3712 🇪🇺 EUVD
Social ReaktionenReagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!

CVE-2021-3712 | ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string w

ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).

Klassifikation & Betroffenheit:
OpenSSL OpenSSL Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k)OpenSSL Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y)openssl openssl *debian debian_linux 9.0debian debian_linux 10.0debian debian_linux 11.0netapp e-series_santricity_os_controller *mcafee epolicy_orchestrator *
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') 🎯 Medium

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.

🛡️ Empfohlene Mitigation: Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Vollständige Definition bei MITRE ➔
🧪 Exploit-Evidenz:
🩹 Patch verfügbar (OSV):
🩹 e818b74be2170fbe957a07b0da4401c2b694b3b8 (Commit) 🩹 e04bd3433fd84e1861bf258ea37928d9845e6a86 (Commit)
🇩🇪 BSI-Sicherheitshinweise: BSI · hoch · Dell Data Protection Advisor: Mehrere Schwachstellen ↗ BSI · hoch · Oracle Hyperion: Mehrere Schwachstellen ↗ BSI · IBM DB2 REST: Mehrere Schwachstellen ↗
📚 Referenzen & Quellen:
Ausnutzungs-Zeitleiste:
CVSS-Vektor-Analyse: 7.4
AV · Angriffsvektor Netzwerk
AC · Komplexität Hoch
PR · Privilegien Keine
UI · Interaktion Keine
S · Scope Unverändert
C · Vertraulichkeit Hoch
I · Integrität Keine
A · Verfügbarkeit Hoch
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Veröffentlicht:24.08.2021
Aktualisiert:17.06.2026 04:05
Assigner (CNA):openssl
EUVD-ID:EUVD-2022-4935
EPSS-Verlauf (9 Messungen)
Quellen: 🇪🇺 EUVD-Datenbank (ENISA) + 🇺🇸 NVD-Anreicherung · 24-h-Cache
CWE-94: Code Injection ✓ Offizieller Patch / Advisory verfügbar
💡 Gegenmaßnahme: Sicherheits-Update des Herstellers zeitnah einspielen und Netzwerksegmentierung prüfen.
🗨 Diskussion zu CVE-2021-3712 0 Beiträge
Antworten, Upvotes & Reaktionen — wie im Community-Feed. Markdown und ```Code``` unterstützt.

Noch keine Analyse zu CVE-2021-3712

Sei der Erste: Einschätzung, Betroffenheit, Workaround oder PoC — mit Antworten im Thread.

↩️ Antworten auf:

Beitrag zu CVE-2021-3712 verfassen

Neu hier? Als Mitglied sammelst du Karma für Beiträge und Answers.
📧
Code-Formatierung: ```bash ... ``` oder `inline code` 0 / 2000
🔴 Live Security Advisory & EPSS Exploit Radar

Zero-Day & Vulnerability Intelligence Hub

Echtzeit-Tracking mit EPSS Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeiten, Angriffsvektor-Decodern und KI-Patch-Anleitungen.

374k+ 🇪🇺 EUVD-Datenbank
0 🔴 Critical im Radar
0 ⚠️ CISA KEV
0 🔓 Aktiv ausgenutzt
0 🧪 PoC verfügbar
📊 Historien-Charts — Criticals-Trend · Vendors · EPSS-Verteilung
🔴 Criticals pro Monat (12 M) 2025-10: 257 2025-11: 257 2025-12: 426 2026-01: 431 2026-02: 417 2026-03: 649 2026-04: 574 2026-05: 682 2026-06: 941 2026-07: 1327 2026-08: 1827 2026-09: 1511 2026-10: 289 9.588 Criticals gesamt
🏢 Top-Vendor-Veröffentlichungen (6 M) Adobe Apple Google Linux Microsoft Oracle Corporation
● Adobe ● Apple ● Google ● Linux ● Microsoft ● Oracle
📈 EPSS-Verteilung (Messungen)
Tier2026-09-242026-10-08
≥90 %484342
≥50 %14361061
≥10 %162
<10 %30562
Datenquellen & Methodik: Primärquelle ist die EUVD der ENISA (laufender Datenbank-Sync, alle 15 Minuten), abgeglichen mit dem CISA-KEV-Katalog und der NVD — Detail-Dossiers reichern fehlende Felder live per NVD an — mit Fallback auf CIRCL vulnerability-lookup (EU/Non-Profit, aggregiert CVE-, GitHub- und OSV-Advisories). Der CISA-KEV-Katalog (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities, ~1.700 aktiv ausgenutzte Schwachstellen) wird bei jedem Sync vollständig neu geladen und kreuzreferenziert — filterbar über die KEV-Pille. CVSS 3.1 wird nach Ampel-Logik aus Verteidigersicht dekodiert; EPSS bezeichnet die 30-Tage-Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit (FIRST.org).
🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD 🇺🇸 NVD ⚠️ CISA KEV ⚡ EPSS
Ökosystem & Hersteller Bedrohungs-Matrix:
Schweregrad & Status:
Hersteller (Datenbank-weit, 98.994 Einträge):
Quelle:
Schwachstellen-Kategorie (CWE):
🔍
7.4 HIGH
EPSS 50.4%
CVE-2021-3712 🌐 Netzwerk (Remote) 🔓 Keine Authentifizierung nötig
OpenSSL

CVE-2021-3712 | ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string w

ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer

CWE-94: Code Injection ✓ Offizieller Patch / Advisory verfügbar
💡 Gegenmaßnahme: Sicherheits-Update des Herstellers zeitnah einspielen und Netzwerksegmentierung prüfen.
1 von ~1 Einträgen geladen Ende der Trefferliste — 1 Einträge geladen. Tipp: Filter leichtern für tieferes Blättern.