CVE-2026-108126 | temporal-proxy 0.2.0 through 0.8.0 does not bind encrypted payloads to the namespace they were encrypted for. When payload encryption is enabled, the proxy chooses the decryption key by an identifier stored in the payload rather than by the namespace of the request, and nothing in the ciphertext records that namespace. A caller whom the proxy authorizes only for namespace B, and who has obtained an encrypted payload from namespace A, can therefore have the p
temporal-proxy 0.2.0 through 0.8.0 does not bind encrypted payloads to the namespace they were encrypted for. When payload encryption is enabled, the proxy chooses the decryption key by an identifier stored in the payload rather than by the namespace of the request, and nothing in the ciphertext records that namespace. A caller whom the proxy authorizes only for namespace B, and who has obtained an encrypted payload from namespace A, can therefore have the proxy decrypt it. In 0.8.0, the caller can submit the payload to the codec server's /decode endpoint. In every affected version, a caller who can also write to namespace B on the Temporal server directly can place the payload there and read it back through the proxy. This holds whether namespaces share the default key or each has its own, because a single proxy holds every key it is configured with. The issue does not give the attacker encrypted payloads they could not already obtain, and does not allow encrypted payloads to be modified.
- 🔗 github.com/temporalio/temporal-proxy/blob/v0.8.0/pkg…
- 🔗 github.com/temporalio/temporal-proxy/blob/v0.8.0/pkg…
- 🔗 github.com/temporalio/temporal-proxy/blob/v0.8.0/pkg…
- 🔗 github.com/temporalio/temporal-proxy/discussions/146
- 🔗 github.com/temporalio/temporal-proxy/pull/221
- 🔗 github.com/temporalio/temporal-proxy/commit/6843a2c4…
- 🔗 github.com/temporalio/temporal-proxy/pull/222
- 🔗 github.com/temporalio/temporal-proxy/commit/508991c2…
```Code``` unterstützt. Zero-Day & Vulnerability Intelligence Hub
Echtzeit-Tracking mit EPSS Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeiten, Angriffsvektor-Decodern und KI-Patch-Anleitungen.
📊 Historien-Charts — Criticals-Trend · Vendors · EPSS-Verteilung
| Tier | CVEs | Anteil |
|---|---|---|
| ≥90 % | 720 | 0,2 % |
| ≥50 % | 3.224 | 0,9 % |
| ≥10 % | 22.120 | 6,0 % |
| <10 % | 343.858 | 93,0 % |
CVE-2026-108126 | temporal-proxy 0.2.0 through 0.8.0 does not bind encrypted payloads to the namespace they were encrypted for. When payload encryption is enabled, the proxy chooses the decryption key by an identifier stored in the payload rather than by the namespace of the request, and nothing in the ciphertext records that namespace. A caller whom the proxy authorizes only for namespace B, and who has obtained an encrypted payload from namespace A, can therefore have the p
temporal-proxy 0.2.0 through 0.8.0 does not bind encrypted payloads to the namespace they were encrypted for. When payload encryption is enabled, the proxy chooses the decryption key by an identifier stored in the payload rather than by the
Noch keine Analyse zu CVE-2026-108126
Sei der Erste: Einschätzung, Betroffenheit, Workaround oder PoC — mit Antworten im Thread.