🕵️ SicherheitslückenHak5: Hackers Just Poisoned the Rust Supply Chain | Threat Wire(01.09.2026 um 14:00 Uhr)
🕵️ SicherheitslückenHak5: Hackers Found a Way Into Humanoid Robots | Threat Wire(04.09.2026 um 15:04 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten Bits und so #1021 (Passwort für Laufwerk)(31.08.2026 um 22:15 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten Bits und so #1022 (Wie Weißbier)(06.09.2026 um 20:39 Uhr)
🍏 iOS / Mac OSHue-App 6.0 ist da: das sind die Neuerungen(07.09.2026 um 17:21 Uhr)
🕵️ SicherheitslückenHak5: Hackers Just Poisoned the Rust Supply Chain | Threat Wire(01.09.2026 um 14:00 Uhr)
🕵️ SicherheitslückenHak5: Hackers Found a Way Into Humanoid Robots | Threat Wire(04.09.2026 um 15:04 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten Bits und so #1021 (Passwort für Laufwerk)(31.08.2026 um 22:15 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten Bits und so #1022 (Wie Weißbier)(06.09.2026 um 20:39 Uhr)
🍏 iOS / Mac OSHue-App 6.0 ist da: das sind die Neuerungen(07.09.2026 um 17:21 Uhr)

🔧 Programmierung 🕛 kürzlich 4 Min Lesezeit
0

Stop Parsing JSON Between Services

↗ Quelle (dev.to)
🗣️ Stimme:
📑 Inhaltsübersicht




A Better Way for Inter-Service Communication






The Common Approach: The Ball Game



Imagine building a system where different services pass a ball around, incrementing its value each time. Here's how it typically looks:




CODE
// Node.js service
import Redis from 'redis';

const redis = Redis.createClient();
await redis.connect();

// Subscribe to receive the ball
redis.subscribe('ball:node', async (message) => {
try {
const data = JSON.parse(message);
if (typeof data.value !== 'number') {
console.error('Invalid ball value');
return;
}
const newValue = data.value + 1;
await redis.publish('ball:python', JSON.stringify({ value: newValue }));
} catch (e) {
console.error('Failed to parse ball data', e);
}
});









CODE
# Python service
import redis
import json

r = redis.Redis()
pubsub = r.pubsub()

def handle_message(message):
try:
data = json.loads(message['data'])
if not isinstance(data.get('value'), (int, float)):
print('Invalid ball value')
return
new_value = data['value'] + 1
r.publish('ball:rust', json.dumps({'value': new_value}))
except json.JSONDecodeError:
print('Failed to parse ball data')
except KeyError:
print('Missing value in ball data')

pubsub.subscribe('ball:python')
for message in pubsub.listen():
if message['type'] == 'message':
handle_message(message)






The problems here are clear:




  • Manual JSON parsing and error handling everywhere

  • No type safety between services

  • Channel names need to be manually synchronized

  • Different error handling patterns per language

  • Easy to make mistakes when modifying the data structure






A Better Way: Schema-First Development with Memorix



First, let's set up Memorix:




CODE
# Install CLI
brew tap uvop/memorix
brew install memorix

# Install client for your language
npx jsr add @memorix/client-redis # Node.js/Bun/Deno
pip install memorix-client-redis # Python
cargo add memorix-client-redis # Rust






Now, define your schema once (schema.memorix):




CODE
Config {
export: {
engine: Redis(env(REDIS_URL))
files: [
{
language: typescript
path: "node/src/schema.generated.ts"
}
{
language: python
path: "python/src/schema_generated.py"
}
{
language: rust
path: "rust/src/schema_generated.rs"
}
]
}
}

Enum {
System {
NODE
PYTHON
RUST
}
}

Task {
pass_ball: {
key: System
payload: u64
}
}






Generate the type-safe clients:




CODE
memorix codegen ./schema.memorix






Look how clean the services become:




CODE
// Node service
import * as mx from "./schema.generated.ts";

const memorix = new mx.Memorix();
await memorix.connect();

const gen = await memorix.task.pass_ball.dequeue(mx.System.NODE);
for await (const ball of gen.asyncIterator) {
const biggerBall = ball + 1;
await memorix.task.pass_ball.enqueue(mx.System.PYTHON, biggerBall);
}









CODE
# Python service
from schema_generated import Memorix, System

memorix = Memorix()
memorix.connect()

for ball in memorix.task.pass_ball.dequeue(System.PYTHON):
bigger_ball = ball + 1
memorix.task.pass_ball.enqueue(System.RUST, bigger_ball)






The benefits are immediately clear:




  • No manual JSON parsing or error handling

  • Full type safety and IDE autocomplete in every language

  • Consistent API across languages and platforms (Redis, Kafka, etc.)

  • Modern language features like async generators

  • Compile-time errors catch mistakes early

  • Changed from publish/subscribe to queue-based messaging for easy scaling across multiple instances






Other Memorix features



Rich Data Typing:




CODE
Task {
processUser: {
payload: { # Inline type
id: u64
authType: UserType # Enums
avatar_url: string? # Optional
data: UserData # Sharing complex typing
}
}
}

Enum {
UserAuthType {
EMAIL
GOOGLE
GITHUB
}
}

Type {
UserData: {
is_admin: boolean
preferences: [
{
preference_id: string
value: boolean
}
]
}
}






Caching with TTL:




CODE
Cache {
userSession: {
key: string
payload: UserSession
ttl: "3600" # Expires in 1 hour
}
}






Pub/Sub for Broadcast Messages:




CODE
PubSub {
userLoggedIn: {
payload: {
userId: string
timestamp: u64
}
}
}






Task Queues with Different Strategies:




CODE
Task {
processImage: {
payload: ImageData
queue_type: "lifo" # Last in, first out
}
}






Scalability with Ease:




  • Import/export schema files

  • Private/public APIs

  • Namespacing

  • Environment variables support

  • Cross-service type sharing






Conclusion



The ball game example shows how Memorix transforms messy inter-service communication into clean, type-safe code. Instead of worrying about JSON parsing and message formats, you can focus on building features.



Ready to try it? Check out the .

Vollständiger Original-Bericht
Ausführliche Details, Code-Beispiele & Hersteller-Stellungnahme auf dev.to.
↗ Original-Artikel auf dev.to lesen
Wie bewertest du diesen Beitrag?
1 Klick Feedback
Teilen mit Netzwerk & Team:

Community-Analysen & Experten-Meinungen 0

Verfasse deine eigene Analyse, teile Workarounds oder diskutiere diesen Vorfall im Blog.
Noch keine Community-Analyse verfasst. Markiere einen Textabschnitt oder klicke oben auf Eigene Analyse verfassen“!
Community Pulse: Relevanz-Einschätzung
1 Klick Experten-Votum
🔴 Akute Relevanz 0%
🟡 In Evaluierung 0%
🟢 Keine Auswirkung 0%
Spannende Innovation 0%
Verwandte Story-Cluster & Quellen (Vektor-KI)
Port 8095 Engine
1 Quelle
Hackers Just Poisoned the Rust Supply Chain | Threat Wire
1 Quelle
Hackers Found a Way Into Humanoid Robots | Threat Wire
1 Quelle
Bits und so #1021 (Passwort für Laufwerk)
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten Stop Parsing JSON Between Services

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: Stop, Parsing, JSON, Between · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...