🪟 Windows TippsThe Gemini desktop app is now available for Windows(11.09.2026 um 17:06 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten ChatGPT automatically logged out [Fix](12.09.2026 um 17:09 Uhr)
🪟 Windows TippsHow to remove a Drop-Down list in Excel(13.09.2026 um 01:50 Uhr)
⚠️ Malware / Trojaner / VirenWindows 11 just dropped the tool ransomware abused, Microsoft says don’t restore WMIC(10.09.2026 um 20:11 Uhr)
🪟 Windows TippsServertimeout in Outlook über 10 Minuten verlängern(12.09.2026 um 15:10 Uhr)
🪟 Windows TippsThe Gemini desktop app is now available for Windows(11.09.2026 um 17:06 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten ChatGPT automatically logged out [Fix](12.09.2026 um 17:09 Uhr)
🪟 Windows TippsHow to remove a Drop-Down list in Excel(13.09.2026 um 01:50 Uhr)
⚠️ Malware / Trojaner / VirenWindows 11 just dropped the tool ransomware abused, Microsoft says don’t restore WMIC(10.09.2026 um 20:11 Uhr)
🪟 Windows TippsServertimeout in Outlook über 10 Minuten verlängern(12.09.2026 um 15:10 Uhr)

🐧 Linux Tipps 🕛 vor 1 Jahr 2 Min Lesezeit
0

Does auto-cpufreq work better for AMD cpus than TLP?

↗ Quelle (reddit.com)
🗣️ Stimme:

I recently migrated to Linux on my A485 Thinkpad with a 2500u Ryzen and have been trying to improve its battery life.

Initially I tried using TLP, which many people online seem to be recommending. It seems like a great tool with great configuration options, but looking around the config I noticed most of the tweakable values seemed to be specifically for Intel chips.

I still figured I'd give it a shot and checked out some stats by monitoring powertop.

Using TLP powerstat reported a discharge rate between 6-7 watts when idle (Linux Mint, Cinnamon). Making recommended tweaks (mostly just setting stuff on Battery mode to powersave or equivalent) I couldn't really make a difference on the reported discharge rate.

I then switched over to auto-cpufreq and by default the idle discharge rate went as low as 5.7 watts, so it seems to me that auto-cpufreq is able to scale the cpu's state a bit better.

Of course I realize that these stats are not measured too accurately and I don't want to seem that I'm making a statement on which of these tools is better, I was simply wondering if anyone had noticed something simliar or had more knowledge regarding these tools and their compatibility with AMD cpus.

Overall, with these tools battery life on Linux seems to be at least 0,5h better than on win10!

submitted by [comments]
Vollständiger Original-Bericht
Ausführliche Details, Code-Beispiele & Hersteller-Stellungnahme auf reddit.com.
↗ Original-Artikel auf reddit.com lesen
Wie bewertest du diesen Beitrag?
1 Klick Feedback
Teilen mit Netzwerk & Team:

Community-Analysen & Experten-Meinungen 0

Verfasse deine eigene Analyse, teile Workarounds oder diskutiere diesen Vorfall im Blog.
Noch keine Community-Analyse verfasst. Markiere einen Textabschnitt oder klicke oben auf Eigene Analyse verfassen“!
Community Pulse: Relevanz-Einschätzung
1 Klick Experten-Votum
🔴 Akute Relevanz 0%
🟡 In Evaluierung 0%
🟢 Keine Auswirkung 0%
Spannende Innovation 0%
Verwandte Story-Cluster & Quellen (Vektor-KI)
Port 8095 Engine
1 Quelle
The Gemini desktop app is now available for Windows
1 Quelle
ChatGPT automatically logged out [Fix]
1 Quelle
How to remove a Drop-Down list in Excel
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten Does auto-cpufreq work better for AMD cpus than TLP?

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: Does, autocpufreq, work, better · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...