Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Echtzeit-Radar & Feeds
Alle RSS Feeds ➔
👥 Community & Social
•
IT Security NachrichtenBetrüger phishen mit vermeintlicher Reisebestätigung - IT-Markt(24.09.2026 um 23:41 Uhr)
••
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Daily Summary 2026-09-24(24.09.2026 um 23:55 Uhr)
•
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Roundup: 2026-09-24(24.09.2026 um 23:57 Uhr)
•
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Hourly Summary 2026-09-25 00h : 9 posts(25.09.2026 um 00:00 Uhr)
•••
IT NachrichtenMicrosoft puts Brad Smith in charge of communications(25.09.2026 um 00:08 Uhr)
•••
IT Security NachrichtenBetrüger phishen mit vermeintlicher Reisebestätigung - IT-Markt(24.09.2026 um 23:41 Uhr)
••
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Daily Summary 2026-09-24(24.09.2026 um 23:55 Uhr)
•
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Roundup: 2026-09-24(24.09.2026 um 23:57 Uhr)
•
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Hourly Summary 2026-09-25 00h : 9 posts(25.09.2026 um 00:00 Uhr)
•••
IT NachrichtenMicrosoft puts Brad Smith in charge of communications(25.09.2026 um 00:08 Uhr)
••
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

Stop Guessing What Caused Your Flaky Tests Fail or Pass

Flaky tests don’t fail when you expect them to. They fail when you least have time. One moment everything is green, the next your CI pipeline is red — and then, magically, it passes on rerun. ❌ ❌ ✅ → Passed So… what just happened?…

0
↗ Quelle (dev.to)
Reagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!

Flaky tests don’t fail when you expect them to.

They fail when you least have time.



One moment everything is green, the next your CI pipeline is red — and then, magically, it passes on rerun.




❌ ❌ ✅ → Passed






So… what just happened?




  • Was it a network issue?

  • Timing? State leakage?

  • The classic DOM detached?

  • May be, the fixture didnt return the value?









The Problem: We Only See the Final Outcome



Most test reports show you only the final result, or you install a bunch of plugins that would scrap all the xmls for you to show you multiple tests of same title and you click each one of them to see which might have ran first?



If a test fails twice and passes on the third attempt, all you see is:




TestCheckoutFlow → Rerun
TestCheckoutFlow → Rerun
TestCheckoutFlow → Rerun
TestCheckoutFlow → PASSED






That “pass” hides everything that matters:




  • Why did it fail initially?

  • What changed between attempts?

  • Is this a real bug or just instability?



👉 You’re left guessing or too much time scrolling and finding what would have ran first.



And guessing doesn’t scale — especially in CI and neither you wanna write a log scraper on top of it.









What Flaky Tests Actually Do to Your System



Flaky tests aren’t just annoying. They slowly break your engineering system:




  • You start ignoring failures (“just rerun it”) - coz I dont have time to dig through the logs

  • Confidence in CI drops

  • Real bugs(Uncaught ones) get buried under noise

  • Debugging becomes reactive instead of intentional



Over time, your test suite stops being a safety net and becomes background noise.









The Missing Piece: Attempt-Level Visibility



The root issue is simple:




We don’t see what happened in each retry.




When you use tools like pytest-rerunfailures, retries happen silently. The final result is shown — the journey is lost.



But that journey is where the bug lives.



I had a test that was just consistently failing in re-runs and since I had no control over the data at that point of time, the re-runs simply showed me that there were multiple records created and it failed(But there would not be multiple records in the first one?), so why did it fail in the first place?









A Better Way: Capture Every Attempt



To solve this, we shipped an update to pytest-html-plus that records every attempt of a test, not just the final one.



Instead of:




TestLogin → Passed






You see:




TestLogin  → Passed
├── Attempt 1 → Failed (TimeoutError)
├── Attempt 2 → Failed (Element not found)
└── Attempt 3 → Passed






Now you can answer:




  • Is it a timing issue?

  • Is the UI not ready?

  • Is an API inconsistent?



👉 No more guessing. Just evidence.









Real Example: A “Passing” Test That Was Actually Broken



I had a test that looked harmless:




❌ ❌ ❌ → Passed






Normally, I would move on.



But with attempt-level logs, the story changed:




  • Attempt 1 → API response delayed - but created a partial record

  • Attempt 2 → UI rendered partially - but did not find that full record



This wasn’t a passing test.



This was a race condition waiting to hit production.









But Won’t This Make Reports Noisy?



Yes — if done poorly.



Logging every attempt can easily clutter reports, especially in large test suites.



So we designed it to stay clean by default:




  • Attempts are collapsible

  • Logs are grouped per attempt

  • You expand only what you need



👉 You get detail without sacrificing readability.









Plug & Play with Pytest



Getting started is simple:




pip install pytest-html-plus
pytest --html=report.html






Working example



You get:




  • HTML reports with attempt breakdown

  • JSON output for automation

  • Flaky test detection

  • Clear visibility into retries



No major setup. No workflow changes. No third party plugins needed









When This Helps the Most



This is especially useful if:




  • You use retries in CI (pytest-rerunfailures)

  • Tests pass locally but fail in CI

  • You suspect timing, async, or state issues

  • You’ve ever said “it passed on rerun, so it’s fine”









The Mindset Shift



Stop asking:




“Did the test pass?”




Start asking:




“How did the test pass?”




Because that’s where the real bugs hide.









Final Thought



Flaky tests don’t just waste time —

they slowly erode trust in your system.



And once trust is gone,

your tests stop protecting you.



If you can see every attempt,

you can fix the root cause — not just silence the symptom.






If you want to try it out:



👉 [https://github.com/reporterplus/pytest-html-plus / https://pypi.org/project/pytest-html-plus/]



Would love to hear how you’re dealing with flaky tests in your setup.

CTI Threat Relationship Graph2 Knoten / 1 Relationen
CVE / Incident Software MITRE ATT&CK CWE Weakness IoC
SOC Incident Playbook: Vulnerability Remediation & Verification
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
title: Detect Exploitation - Stop Guessing What Caused Your Flaky Tests Fail or Pass
id: 0aa5efe9-2ad6-426c-b5e1-658263006ff2
status: experimental
description: Automatisch generierte SIEM-Erkennungsregel basierend auf CTI Intelligence
references:
  - https://tsecurity.de/
author: iShareStuff CTI Automated Detection Engine
date: 2026-09-25
logsource:
  category: network_connection
  product: any
detection:
  selection:
      CommandLine|contains:
        - 'exploit'
  condition: selection
falsepositives:
  - Legitime administrative Zugriffe oder Penetrationstests
level: high
tags:
  - attack.initial_access
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
rule CTI_Threat_Indicator {
    meta:
        author = "iShareStuff CTI Automated Detection Engine"
        date = "2026-09-25"
        description = "YARA Signature for "
    strings:
        $str = "Stop Guessing What Caused Your" ascii wide
    condition:
        any of them
}
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
index=security sourcetype IN ("cisco:asa", "pan:traffic", "zeek_conn", "suricata", "WinEventLog:Security")
("Stop Guessing What Caused Your Flaky Tes")
| stats count earliest(_time) as first_seen latest(_time) as last_seen by src_ip, dest_ip, dest_host, signature
| eval first_seen=strftime(first_seen, "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"), last_seen=strftime(last_seen, "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")
| sort - count
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
message: "*Stop Guessing What Caused Your Flaky Tes*"
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
CommonSecurityLog
| where Message has "Stop Guessing What Caused Your Flaky Tes"
| summarize EventCount = count(), FirstSeen = min(TimeGenerated), LastSeen = max(TimeGenerated) by SourceIP, DestinationIP, DestinationPort, Activity
| extend DetectionRule = "iShareStuff-CTI-Compiled"
| sort by EventCount desc
🎯
MITRE ATT&CK Matrix Navigator 14 Taktiken
Reconnaissance
-
Resource Development
-
Initial Access
Execution
Persistence
-
Privilege Escalation
Defense Evasion
Credential Access
-
Discovery
-
Lateral Movement
-
Collection
-
Command and Control
Exfiltration
-
Impact
tsecurity.de Cognitive Threat RAG
Fokus-Vektor:

Kognitive Analyse für identifizierte Bedrohung: Erhöhte Bedrohungslage im Bereich Stop Guessing What Caused Your Flaky Tes.... Basierend auf 368k Vektor-Korrelationen werden sofortige Isolationsmaßnahmen für betroffene Endpunkte empfohlen.

🛡️ Angriffsfläche & Exposure

Netzwerk/Remote-Zugriff ohne Vorauthentifizierung möglich.

⚡ Empfohlene Sofortmaßnahmen
  • 1. Perimeter-Inspektion: Relevante Portfreigaben und exponierte Endpunkte unverzüglich scannen.
  • 2. Patch-Applikation: Hersteller-Hotfix einspielen oder betroffene Daemons in isolierte DMZ-Segmente überführen.
  • 3. Telemetrie & EDR-Alerts: Prozessaufrufe und Child-Processes auf anomale Shell-Spawns überwachen.
🔗 Semantisch verwandte Zero-Days MariaDB 11.7 VEC
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten Stop Guessing What Caused Your Flaky Tests Fail or Pass

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: Stop, Guessing, What, Caused · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
ZERO-DAY CVE-2026-82585 | The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware transmits sensitive information o…
Advisory →
tsecurity.de Icon
Offline-Lesen, Eilmeldungen & 0ms Ladezeit

Installiere tsecurity.de direkt auf deinen Home-Bildschirm für das ultimative Vollbild-Magazinerlebnis ohne Browser-Leisten.

Nächster Beitrag
Themen-Radar & Intelligence Matrix
Echtzeit-Taxonomie nach Angriffsvektoren & Plattformen

tsecurity.de Live Threat Radar

🔴 LIVE RADAR
MONITORING
AKTIV
CVE-DATENBANK
LIVE
🔍
Community Radar & Live Chat
Sentinel Bot online • Live-Stream
Dein Cluster: Security Explorer
Match:
lädt…
Verbindung zum Community-Stream wird aufgebaut...
Bearbeitungsmodus — Senden überschreibt deine Nachricht
Community-Puls — was gerade passiert
lädt…
Aktivitäten deiner Analysten
lädt…
Neues Thema oder Eilmeldung einreichen

Reiche interessante Links, Zero-Days oder Debatten ein. Die Community entscheidet per Upvote über die Veröffentlichung.

Heiß diskutierte Einreichungen
📂 Keine gespeicherten Artikel vorhanden.
Zurück Ziehen Vor
Links: vorheriger Artikel • Rechts: nächster Artikel • unten: schließen
News NIS-2 Frühwarnung Tier-1 Intel TTP ⏱️ 3 Min vor 10 Min
Artikeldaten werden geladen...
↗ Original-Quelle