🕵️ SicherheitslückenHak5: Hackers Just Poisoned the Rust Supply Chain | Threat Wire(01.09.2026 um 14:00 Uhr)
🕵️ SicherheitslückenHak5: Hackers Found a Way Into Humanoid Robots | Threat Wire(04.09.2026 um 15:04 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten Bits und so #1021 (Passwort für Laufwerk)(31.08.2026 um 22:15 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten Bits und so #1022 (Wie Weißbier)(06.09.2026 um 20:39 Uhr)
🍏 iOS / Mac OSHue-App 6.0 ist da: das sind die Neuerungen(07.09.2026 um 17:21 Uhr)
🕵️ SicherheitslückenHak5: Hackers Just Poisoned the Rust Supply Chain | Threat Wire(01.09.2026 um 14:00 Uhr)
🕵️ SicherheitslückenHak5: Hackers Found a Way Into Humanoid Robots | Threat Wire(04.09.2026 um 15:04 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten Bits und so #1021 (Passwort für Laufwerk)(31.08.2026 um 22:15 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten Bits und so #1022 (Wie Weißbier)(06.09.2026 um 20:39 Uhr)
🍏 iOS / Mac OSHue-App 6.0 ist da: das sind die Neuerungen(07.09.2026 um 17:21 Uhr)

🔧 Programmierung 🕛 kürzlich 9 Min Lesezeit
0

Monday Grind Blueprint #2: 80 Processes Explained, 3 Issues Targeted, 1 Week to Ship

↗ Quelle (dev.to)
🗣️ Stimme:




Nobody needs another AI feature.



They need to know if svchost.exe is safe or a virus.

I spent Easter weekend building something embarrassingly simple: a JSON file that explains what 80+ Windows processes actually do.

Not machine learning. Not blockchain integration. Not "AI-powered insights."

Just context.

And it works better than I expected.



The Problem: Task Manager Shows Data, Not Understanding

Open Task Manager right now. You'll see:



svchost.exe — 6 instances, 800MB RAM

dwm.exe — 40% CPU spike

RuntimeBroker.exe — Random activity

System — Always at the top



What do you do?

Google "is svchost.exe a virus?"

Read 10 forum threads.

Still not sure.

Maybe kill the process.

Break something.

PC_Workman now solves this in 0.5 seconds:

Hover on svchost.exe in the chat →

Service Host Process

Microsoft Corporation

Hosts Windows services. Multiple instances are normal.

Power: Low-Medium

Safety: Safe (part of Windows)

CPU: 1-15% per instance

RAM: 50-200MB per instance

Done.

No Google. No paranoia. Just facts.



Easter Weekend: From "Too Tired" to "Shipped"

Context:

Week 1 at Żabka retail: 5:30 AM starts, solo store shifts by day 5, 20 zł/h (~$5/hour).

Monday plan: Process library + timestamps + 2 articles

Tuesday-Friday reality: Too exhausted to code after 9-hour shifts

Saturday-Sunday: Redemption arc

What shipped:



process_library.json — 80+ process definitions

process_library.py — Loader with lookups

tooltip.py — Hover UI widget

Integration in panel.py — Regex binding for chat



Time: ~4 hours total

Difficulty: Medium (Tkinter events + regex)

Impact: HIGH (users finally understand what processes are)



What I Built: The Process Library System

File 1: process_library.json (The Data)

Location: PC_Workman_HCK/data/process_library.json

Size: 80+ definitions (will grow to 150+)

Categories:



System: explorer.exe, svchost.exe, dwm.exe, csrss.exe

Browsers: chrome.exe, firefox.exe, edge.exe, opera.exe, brave.exe

Gaming: steam.exe, valorant.exe, leagueoflegends.exe, fortnite.exe, minecraft.exe

Development: python.exe, node.exe, code.exe, docker.exe, git.exe

Communication: discord.exe, teams.exe, zoom.exe, slack.exe

Media: spotify.exe, vlc.exe, obs64.exe, photoshop.exe

Productivity: excel.exe, word.exe, notion.exe, outlook.exe

Utilities: 7zfm.exe, winrar.exe, everything.exe

Virtualization: vmware.exe, virtualbox.exe



Structure:

json{

"chrome.exe": {

"name": "Google Chrome",

"vendor": "Google LLC",

"category": "browser",

"description": "Web browser. RAM usage increases with open tabs.",

"power_usage": "high",

"safety": "safe",

"typical_cpu": "5-25%",

"typical_ram": "200-800MB per window"

},

"svchost.exe": {

"name": "Service Host Process",

"vendor": "Microsoft Corporation",

"category": "system",

"description": "Hosts Windows services. Multiple instances are normal.",

"power_usage": "low_medium",

"safety": "safe",

"typical_cpu": "1-15% per instance",

"typical_ram": "50-200MB per instance"

}

}


No AI-generated descriptions. All written in plain English, human-verified.



File 2: process_library.py (The Loader)

Location: PC_Workman_HCK/hck_gpt/process_library.py

What it does:



Loads JSON on startup

Provides case-insensitive lookups

Formats tooltip text for display



Implementation:

pythonclass ProcessLibrary:

` """Loads process definitions from JSON and provides lookups"""



CODE
def __init__(self):
self.processes = {}
self._load_library()

def _load_library(self):
"""Load process_library.json"""
lib_path = os.path.join(
os.path.dirname(__file__),
'..',
'data',
'process_library.json'
)

if os.path.exists(lib_path):
with open(lib_path, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f:
self.processes = json.load(f)
print(f"[ProcessLibrary] Loaded {len(self.processes)} process definitions")

def get_process_info(self, process_name):
"""Case-insensitive lookup"""
return self.processes.get(process_name.lower().strip())

def format_tooltip_text(self, process_name):
"""Format for display"""
info = self.get_process_info(process_name)
if not info:
return None

return f"""📦 {info['name']}



{info['vendor']}



{info['description']}



Power: {info['power_usage']}

Safety: {info['safety']}

CPU: {info['typical_cpu']}

RAM: {info['typical_ram']}"""





Singleton instance



process_library = ProcessLibrary()`

Why singleton? One load at startup, shared across all components.



File 3: tooltip.py (The UI Widget)

Location: PC_Workman_HCK/hck_gpt/tooltip.py

What it does:



Creates borderless tooltip window

Positions near mouse cursor

Displays formatted process information

Auto-hides on mouse leave



Implementation:

pythonclass ProcessTooltip:

` """Shows tooltip on hover over process names"""



CODE
def __init__(self, parent):
self.parent = parent
self.tooltip_window = None

def show(self, event, process_name, tooltip_text):
"""Show tooltip at mouse position"""
if not tooltip_text:
return

self.hide() # Destroy old tooltip

# Create borderless window
self.tooltip_window = tk.Toplevel(self.parent)
self.tooltip_window.wm_overrideredirect(True)
self.tooltip_window.wm_attributes("-topmost", True)

# Position near mouse
x = event.x_root + 20
y = event.y_root + 10
self.tooltip_window.wm_geometry(f"+{x}+{y}")

# Styled frame + label
frame = tk.Frame(
self.tooltip_window,
bg=THEME["bg_panel"],
highlightbackground=THEME["accent2"],
highlightthickness=2,
padx=12,
pady=8
)
frame.pack()

label = tk.Label(
frame,
text=tooltip_text,
bg=THEME["bg_panel"],
fg=THEME["text"],
font=("Consolas", 9),
justify="left"
)
label.pack()

def hide(self):
"""Destroy tooltip"""
if self.tooltip_window:
self.tooltip_window.destroy()
self.tooltip_window = None`



Positioning logic: +20px right, +10px down from cursor to avoid blocking text.



File 4: panel.py (The Integration)

Location: PC_Workman_HCK/hck_gpt/panel.py

What changed:



Import process library:

`

pythonimport re



try:

from hck_gpt.process_library import process_library

from hck_gpt.tooltip import ProcessTooltip

HAS_PROCESS_LIBRARY = True

except ImportError:

HAS_PROCESS_LIBRARY = False

print("[hck_GPT] Process library not available")



Initialize tooltip in init:



python# Tooltip system

self.tooltip = ProcessTooltip(parent) if HAS_PROCESS_LIBRARY else None



Bind tooltips method:



pythondef _bind_process_tooltips(self):

"""Scan chat text for process names and bind hover events"""

if not HAS_PROCESS_LIBRARY or not self.tooltip:

return



CODE
# Get all text
content = self.log.get("1.0", "end-1c")

# Search for .exe patterns
exe_pattern = r'\b\w+\.exe\b'

for match in re.finditer(exe_pattern, content, re.IGNORECASE):
process_name = match.group(0)

# Check if process exists in library
info = process_library.get_process_info(process_name)

if info:
# Create unique tag
tag_name = f"process_{process_name}_{match.start()}"

# Add tag to text
# (Tkinter text index conversion logic here)
self.log.tag_add(tag_name, start_pos, end_pos)

# Style the tag (underline, color)
self.log.tag_config(
tag_name,
foreground=THEME["accent2"],
underline=True
)

# Bind hover events
tooltip_text = process_library.format_tooltip_text(process_name)

self.log.tag_bind(
tag_name,
"<Enter>",
lambda e, pn=process_name, tt=tooltip_text:
self.tooltip.show(e, pn, tt)
)

self.log.tag_bind(
tag_name,
"<Leave>",
lambda e: self.tooltip.hide()
)



Call after adding messages:



pythondef add_message(self, msg):

# ... add text to chat

self._bind_process_tooltips() # Scan and bind`

Regex pattern: r'\b\w+.exe\b' matches word boundaries + .exe extension (case-insensitive)

Why unique tags? Same process can appear multiple times in chat — each occurrence needs separate hover binding.





Total issues to v1.7.8: 17

Selected for this week: 3



Issue #1: Missing tests, discussions, packaging





Source: Own issue

Problem:



Current buttons functional but inconsistent

Need final visual style before Store submission

Button states (normal/hover/active) need polish



Plan:



Finalize button style guide

Redesign primary controls (Start Monitoring, Settings, Reports)

Implement hover animations

Ensure accessibility (contrast ratios, click targets)



Why this matters: UI = first impression for new users



Issue #3: [Code] Optimize hck_gpt/ modules





Free, open source, portable .exe

Windows 10/11



Process library:



JSON format (easy to extend)

MIT license

Contributions welcome



, here :)

All my links here :)



About the Author

I’m Marcin Firmuga. Solo developer and founder of HCK_Labs.



I created PC Workman , an open-source, AI-powered

PC resource monitor

built entirely from scratch on dying hardware during warehouse

shifts in the Netherlands.

This is the first time I’ve given one of my projects a real, dedicated home.



Before this: game translations, PC technician internships, warehouse operations in multiple countries, and countless failed projects I never finished.



But this one? This one stuck.

800+ hours of code. 4 complete UI rebuilds. 16,000 lines deleted.

3 AM all-nighters. Energy drinks and toast.



And finally, an app I wouldn’t close in 5 seconds.

That’s the difference between building and shipping.



PC_Workman is the result.

Vollständiger Original-Bericht
Ausführliche Details, Code-Beispiele & Hersteller-Stellungnahme auf dev.to.
↗ Original-Artikel auf dev.to lesen
Wie bewertest du diesen Beitrag?
1 Klick Feedback
Teilen mit Netzwerk & Team:

Community-Analysen & Experten-Meinungen 0

Verfasse deine eigene Analyse, teile Workarounds oder diskutiere diesen Vorfall im Blog.
Noch keine Community-Analyse verfasst. Markiere einen Textabschnitt oder klicke oben auf Eigene Analyse verfassen“!
Community Pulse: Relevanz-Einschätzung
1 Klick Experten-Votum
🔴 Akute Relevanz 0%
🟡 In Evaluierung 0%
🟢 Keine Auswirkung 0%
Spannende Innovation 0%
Verwandte Story-Cluster & Quellen (Vektor-KI)
Port 8095 Engine
1 Quelle
Hackers Just Poisoned the Rust Supply Chain | Threat Wire
1 Quelle
Hackers Found a Way Into Humanoid Robots | Threat Wire
1 Quelle
Bits und so #1021 (Passwort für Laufwerk)
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten Monday Grind Blueprint #2: 80 Processes Explained, 3 Issues Targeted, 1 Week to Ship

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: Monday, Grind, Blueprint, Processes · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...