Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Echtzeit-Radar & Feeds
Alle RSS Feeds ➔
👥 Community & Social
•
IT Security NachrichtenBetrüger phishen mit vermeintlicher Reisebestätigung - IT-Markt(24.09.2026 um 23:41 Uhr)
••
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Daily Summary 2026-09-24(24.09.2026 um 23:55 Uhr)
•
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Roundup: 2026-09-24(24.09.2026 um 23:57 Uhr)
•
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Hourly Summary 2026-09-25 00h : 9 posts(25.09.2026 um 00:00 Uhr)
•••
IT NachrichtenMicrosoft puts Brad Smith in charge of communications(25.09.2026 um 00:08 Uhr)
•••
IT Security NachrichtenBetrüger phishen mit vermeintlicher Reisebestätigung - IT-Markt(24.09.2026 um 23:41 Uhr)
••
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Daily Summary 2026-09-24(24.09.2026 um 23:55 Uhr)
•
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Roundup: 2026-09-24(24.09.2026 um 23:57 Uhr)
•
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Hourly Summary 2026-09-25 00h : 9 posts(25.09.2026 um 00:00 Uhr)
•••
IT NachrichtenMicrosoft puts Brad Smith in charge of communications(25.09.2026 um 00:08 Uhr)
••
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

I evaluated my self-trained LLM what 31% accuracy actually means

Most AI projects don't include evaluation. They show a nice demo, pick cherry-picked examples, and call it done. I wanted to be honest, so I tested my model on 200 questions it had never seen. How I evaluated The test set has…

0
↗ Quelle (dev.to)
Reagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!

Most AI projects don't include evaluation. They show a nice demo, pick cherry-picked examples, and call it done. I wanted to be honest, so I tested my model on 200 questions it had never seen.






How I evaluated



The test set has 1,273 questions that were never used in training. I tested on 200 of them:




for question in test_questions[:200]:
# Show model the question + 4 options
# Ask it to pick A, B, C, or D
prediction = model.predict(question)

# Check against correct answer
if prediction == correct_answer:
correct += 1

accuracy = correct / 200









The results






Total questions: 200
Correct: 62
Accuracy: 31.0%
Random baseline: 25.0%






My model beats random guessing by 6 percentage points. That's 31% vs 25%.






Is 31% good?



Depends on what you're comparing to.



Compared to random guessing on 4-option MCQs — yes. The model genuinely learned something. It's not just flipping coins.



Compared to GPT-4 on the same benchmark — no. GPT-4 scores around 90%. But GPT-4 has roughly 1000x more parameters and was trained on vastly more data for months on expensive hardware.



For a 1.3 billion parameter model trained for 1.5 hours on a free GPU — 31% is a real result.






What I would do differently



Three things would improve this significantly:




  1. Larger base model — Mistral 7B or LLaMA 3 8B would likely score 50-60%+ on the same benchmark with the same training data. Size matters for reasoning.


  2. Better RAG knowledge base — I stored MCQ training text as knowledge chunks. Clean medical facts from PubMed or clinical guidelines would give the retriever much better material to work with.


  3. Re-ranking — After retrieving top 3 results, a cross-encoder model could re-rank them by true relevance before injecting into the prompt.







Why I'm sharing the real numbers



Because honest numbers are more valuable than fake demos. Any recruiter or engineer who looks at this project can see exactly what was built, how it was tested, and where the limitations are.



The architecture is production-ready. Swap in a 7B model and the retrieval pipeline, API, and UI don't change at all. That's what good engineering looks like.



Full project: github.com/YadavAkhileshh/medmind

Model: huggingface.co/Yakhilesh/medmind-opt-medical

SOC Incident Playbook: Remote Code Execution (RCE) Defense
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
title: Detect Exploitation - I evaluated my self-trained LLM what 31% accuracy actually means
id: ff2e5ff6-fa6d-4de3-aff1-300419089b89
status: experimental
description: Automatisch generierte SIEM-Erkennungsregel basierend auf CTI Intelligence
references:
  - https://tsecurity.de/
author: iShareStuff CTI Automated Detection Engine
date: 2026-09-25
logsource:
  category: network_connection
  product: any
detection:
  selection:
      CommandLine|contains:
        - 'exploit'
  condition: selection
falsepositives:
  - Legitime administrative Zugriffe oder Penetrationstests
level: high
tags:
  - attack.initial_access
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
rule CTI_Threat_Indicator {
    meta:
        author = "iShareStuff CTI Automated Detection Engine"
        date = "2026-09-25"
        description = "YARA Signature for "
    strings:
        $str = "I evaluated my self-trained LL" ascii wide
    condition:
        any of them
}
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
index=security sourcetype IN ("cisco:asa", "pan:traffic", "zeek_conn", "suricata", "WinEventLog:Security")
("I evaluated my self-trained LLM what 31 ")
| stats count earliest(_time) as first_seen latest(_time) as last_seen by src_ip, dest_ip, dest_host, signature
| eval first_seen=strftime(first_seen, "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"), last_seen=strftime(last_seen, "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")
| sort - count
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
message: "*I evaluated my self-trained LLM what 31 *"
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
CommonSecurityLog
| where Message has "I evaluated my self-trained LLM what 31 "
| summarize EventCount = count(), FirstSeen = min(TimeGenerated), LastSeen = max(TimeGenerated) by SourceIP, DestinationIP, DestinationPort, Activity
| extend DetectionRule = "iShareStuff-CTI-Compiled"
| sort by EventCount desc
🎯
MITRE ATT&CK Matrix Navigator 14 Taktiken
Reconnaissance
-
Resource Development
-
Initial Access
Execution
Persistence
-
Privilege Escalation
Defense Evasion
Credential Access
-
Discovery
-
Lateral Movement
-
Collection
-
Command and Control
Exfiltration
-
Impact
tsecurity.de Cognitive Threat RAG
Fokus-Vektor:

Kognitive Analyse für identifizierte Bedrohung: Erhöhte Bedrohungslage im Bereich I evaluated my self-trained LLM what 31%.... Basierend auf 368k Vektor-Korrelationen werden sofortige Isolationsmaßnahmen für betroffene Endpunkte empfohlen.

🛡️ Angriffsfläche & Exposure

Netzwerk/Remote-Zugriff ohne Vorauthentifizierung möglich.

⚡ Empfohlene Sofortmaßnahmen
  • 1. Perimeter-Inspektion: Relevante Portfreigaben und exponierte Endpunkte unverzüglich scannen.
  • 2. Patch-Applikation: Hersteller-Hotfix einspielen oder betroffene Daemons in isolierte DMZ-Segmente überführen.
  • 3. Telemetrie & EDR-Alerts: Prozessaufrufe und Child-Processes auf anomale Shell-Spawns überwachen.
🔗 Semantisch verwandte Zero-Days MariaDB 11.7 VEC
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten I evaluated my self-trained LLM what 31% accuracy actually means

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: evaluated, selftrained, what, accuracy · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
ZERO-DAY CVE-2026-87722 | Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400 / CWE-1333) in regex search q…
Advisory →
tsecurity.de Icon
Offline-Lesen, Eilmeldungen & 0ms Ladezeit

Installiere tsecurity.de direkt auf deinen Home-Bildschirm für das ultimative Vollbild-Magazinerlebnis ohne Browser-Leisten.

Nächster Beitrag
Themen-Radar & Intelligence Matrix
Echtzeit-Taxonomie nach Angriffsvektoren & Plattformen

tsecurity.de Live Threat Radar

🔴 LIVE RADAR
MONITORING
AKTIV
CVE-DATENBANK
LIVE
🔍
Community Radar & Live Chat
Sentinel Bot online • Live-Stream
Dein Cluster: Security Explorer
Match:
lädt…
Verbindung zum Community-Stream wird aufgebaut...
Bearbeitungsmodus — Senden überschreibt deine Nachricht
Community-Puls — was gerade passiert
lädt…
Aktivitäten deiner Analysten
lädt…
Neues Thema oder Eilmeldung einreichen

Reiche interessante Links, Zero-Days oder Debatten ein. Die Community entscheidet per Upvote über die Veröffentlichung.

Heiß diskutierte Einreichungen
📂 Keine gespeicherten Artikel vorhanden.
Zurück Ziehen Vor
Links: vorheriger Artikel • Rechts: nächster Artikel • unten: schließen
News NIS-2 Frühwarnung Tier-1 Intel TTP ⏱️ 3 Min vor 10 Min
Artikeldaten werden geladen...
↗ Original-Quelle