Every other week there's a new GPT-vs-Claude-vs-Gemini benchmark on coding or math or reasoning. None of them tell you whether the model can actually make a decision under uncertainty, where the answer isn't in the training data and the result shows up two weeks later in a P&L.
So I built a different kind of eval. Seven frontier LLMs, $100,000 of paper capital each, identical tools, identical prompts, identical data. Every Monday they pick stocks. The market grades them.
The project is . The clock started January 20, 2026.
The contestants
GPT-5.5 (OpenAI)
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google)
Grok 4.3 (xAI)- DeepSeek V4 Pro
GLM-5.1 (Zhipu)
Kimi K2.6 (Moonshot)- MiniMax M2.7
Each model gets its own isolated Alpaca paper account. Same tool registry, same prompts, same screener output. The LLM is the only variable.
Why this isn't a hedge fund pitch
I want to be upfront. I don't think a weekly LLM-driven portfolio is going to beat the S&P. If it could, hedge funds would already be doing it. Some are; results so far are mixed.
The point of 1rok isn't alpha. It's that "which model should I use" is the most-asked question in AI engineering, and most of the answers are vibes. Coding evals are saturated. Math benchmarks get gamed. I wanted a downstream task where the model has to plan, call tools, synthesize conflicting signals, and commit to a decision, with an objective scoreboard at the end.
Stock picking happens to fit. The fact that everyone has an opinion about it is a bonus.
The pipeline
Every Monday at 9:45 ET, a cron fires and kicks off one run per model in parallel. Each run is 10 agents in 4 stages:
for the live leaderboard, agent traces, and per-trade reasoning.
Run your own: clone github.com/achaljhawar/1rok, set whichever provider keys you have (any one of the six is enough), and
bun run 1rok -- run --model <id>.Star the repo if you want milestones. I'll write up findings as the leaderboard separates.
SOCIAL SHARE CARD GENERATOR