Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Echtzeit-Radar & Feeds
Alle RSS Feeds ➔
👥 Community & Social
•
IT Security NachrichtenBetrüger phishen mit vermeintlicher Reisebestätigung - IT-Markt(24.09.2026 um 23:41 Uhr)
••
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Daily Summary 2026-09-24(24.09.2026 um 23:55 Uhr)
•
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Roundup: 2026-09-24(24.09.2026 um 23:57 Uhr)
•
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Hourly Summary 2026-09-25 00h : 9 posts(25.09.2026 um 00:00 Uhr)
•••
IT NachrichtenMicrosoft puts Brad Smith in charge of communications(25.09.2026 um 00:08 Uhr)
•••
IT Security NachrichtenBetrüger phishen mit vermeintlicher Reisebestätigung - IT-Markt(24.09.2026 um 23:41 Uhr)
••
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Daily Summary 2026-09-24(24.09.2026 um 23:55 Uhr)
•
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Roundup: 2026-09-24(24.09.2026 um 23:57 Uhr)
•
Sicherheitslücken (CVE)IT Security News Hourly Summary 2026-09-25 00h : 9 posts(25.09.2026 um 00:00 Uhr)
•••
IT NachrichtenMicrosoft puts Brad Smith in charge of communications(25.09.2026 um 00:08 Uhr)
••
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

I Got Tired of LLMs Hallucinating Compliance, So I Built an Open-Source Governance Layer

If you have deployed a large language model in production, even just as a personal coding assistant, you have hit the wall. The model gives you a great answer. Confident. Well-structured. You paste it into a Slack thread or a PR review,…

0
↗ Quelle (dev.to)
Reagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!

If you have deployed a large language model in production, even just as a personal coding assistant, you have hit the wall.



The model gives you a great answer. Confident. Well-structured. You paste it into a Slack thread or a PR review, and someone asks: "How did it arrive at that conclusion?"



You do not know. The model does not know either. And there is no audit trail.



I have been in IT for over two decades, and I have watched the AI adoption curve accelerate faster than anything I have seen. But here is what keeps me up at night: we are deploying systems that cannot explain themselves, cannot stay consistent across sessions, and have no governance layer.



So I built one. In the open.



The Problem Is Not Intelligence. It Is Drift. Every LLM session starts fresh. No memory of the last conversation. No enforcement of rules you set yesterday. No record of what it was told to never do. That works fine for a chatbot. It is a liability for anything serious.



I needed a system where:




  • Compliance rules persist across sessions -- indefinitely

  • Every decision has an auditable trail

  • Alignment constraints do not degrade over time

  • The governance layer is model-agnostic (I switch models constantly)



The market is full of "memory" solutions. But they are all recall -- remembering facts, preferences, or conversation history. That is not governance. That is a long context window.



What I needed was alignment memory -- the ability to enforce rules, track compliance scores, and prevent ethical drift. Session after session. Model after model.






What SAFi Does Differently



SAFi (Self Alignment Framework Interface) is an open-source governance layer that sits between you and any LLM.



Here is the architecture in plain terms:



1. A Compliance Engine

Rules are defined as structured constraints -- not vague system prompts. Each constraint has a weight, a scoring mechanism, and an audit log. You can see exactly which rules were triggered on every response.



2. Alignment Memory

Unlike "remember my name" memory, SAFi stores compliance state across sessions. If you told the system yesterday to never generate financial advice, that rule is still enforced today. No drift. No resets.



3. Model-Agnostic Interface

Swap out GPT-5 for Llama 3, Claude, or a local Mistral instance. The governance layer stays the same. Your rules, your audit trail, your compliance scores -- all independent of the underlying model.



4. Open Source

No vendor lock-in. No black-box compliance. Every line of the framework is on GitHub, auditable by anyone.






Who This Is For




  • Developers running LLMs in production who need guardrails that actually stick

  • IT Directors (like me) who are responsible for AI governance and cannot sleep at night wondering what the model just told a customer

  • Open source contributors who want to shape the future of AI alignment

  • Anyone who is tired of re-prompting the same constraints every session






A Real Use Case



I am not a compliance officer. I am not a philosopher. I am an IT Director who codes on weekends and realized the tools for AI governance did not exist.

So I built SAFi as a side project. It is now the most honest code I have written -- because every line is about making AI explainable, auditable, and trustworthy.






Try It



The repo is live at github.com/jnamaya/SAFi. Issues, PRs, and honest feedback are all welcome.



I am not selling anything. I am not building a startup. I am building the governance layer I wish already existed.



If you have hit the same wall -- models giving answers you cannot audit, rules that do not persist, alignment that drifts -- fork the repo, open an issue, or just tell me I am building the wrong thing.



Your feedback shapes the roadmap.

SOC Incident Playbook: Remote Code Execution (RCE) Defense
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
title: Detect Exploitation - I Got Tired of LLMs Hallucinating Compliance, So I Built an Open-Source Governance Layer
id: 332a24ba-06cc-4954-a567-e7b1ce13dd52
status: experimental
description: Automatisch generierte SIEM-Erkennungsregel basierend auf CTI Intelligence
references:
  - https://tsecurity.de/
author: iShareStuff CTI Automated Detection Engine
date: 2026-09-25
logsource:
  category: network_connection
  product: any
detection:
  selection:
      CommandLine|contains:
        - 'exploit'
  condition: selection
falsepositives:
  - Legitime administrative Zugriffe oder Penetrationstests
level: high
tags:
  - attack.initial_access
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
rule CTI_Threat_Indicator {
    meta:
        author = "iShareStuff CTI Automated Detection Engine"
        date = "2026-09-25"
        description = "YARA Signature for "
    strings:
        $str = "I Got Tired of LLMs Hallucinat" ascii wide
    condition:
        any of them
}
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
index=security sourcetype IN ("cisco:asa", "pan:traffic", "zeek_conn", "suricata", "WinEventLog:Security")
("I Got Tired of LLMs Hallucinating Compli")
| stats count earliest(_time) as first_seen latest(_time) as last_seen by src_ip, dest_ip, dest_host, signature
| eval first_seen=strftime(first_seen, "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"), last_seen=strftime(last_seen, "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")
| sort - count
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
message: "*I Got Tired of LLMs Hallucinating Compli*"
Syntax validiert (0 Fehler)
CommonSecurityLog
| where Message has "I Got Tired of LLMs Hallucinating Compli"
| summarize EventCount = count(), FirstSeen = min(TimeGenerated), LastSeen = max(TimeGenerated) by SourceIP, DestinationIP, DestinationPort, Activity
| extend DetectionRule = "iShareStuff-CTI-Compiled"
| sort by EventCount desc
🎯
MITRE ATT&CK Matrix Navigator 14 Taktiken
Reconnaissance
-
Resource Development
-
Initial Access
Execution
Persistence
-
Privilege Escalation
Defense Evasion
Credential Access
-
Discovery
-
Lateral Movement
-
Collection
-
Command and Control
Exfiltration
-
Impact
tsecurity.de Cognitive Threat RAG
Fokus-Vektor:

Kognitive Analyse für identifizierte Bedrohung: Erhöhte Bedrohungslage im Bereich I Got Tired of LLMs Hallucinating Compli.... Basierend auf 368k Vektor-Korrelationen werden sofortige Isolationsmaßnahmen für betroffene Endpunkte empfohlen.

🛡️ Angriffsfläche & Exposure

Netzwerk/Remote-Zugriff ohne Vorauthentifizierung möglich.

⚡ Empfohlene Sofortmaßnahmen
  • 1. Perimeter-Inspektion: Relevante Portfreigaben und exponierte Endpunkte unverzüglich scannen.
  • 2. Patch-Applikation: Hersteller-Hotfix einspielen oder betroffene Daemons in isolierte DMZ-Segmente überführen.
  • 3. Telemetrie & EDR-Alerts: Prozessaufrufe und Child-Processes auf anomale Shell-Spawns überwachen.
🔗 Semantisch verwandte Zero-Days MariaDB 11.7 VEC
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten I Got Tired of LLMs Hallucinating Compliance, So I Built an Open-Source Governance Layer

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: Tired, LLMs, Hallucinating, Compliance · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
ZERO-DAY CVE-2026-82585 | The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware transmits sensitive information o…
Advisory →
tsecurity.de Icon
Offline-Lesen, Eilmeldungen & 0ms Ladezeit

Installiere tsecurity.de direkt auf deinen Home-Bildschirm für das ultimative Vollbild-Magazinerlebnis ohne Browser-Leisten.

Nächster Beitrag
Themen-Radar & Intelligence Matrix
Echtzeit-Taxonomie nach Angriffsvektoren & Plattformen

tsecurity.de Live Threat Radar

🔴 LIVE RADAR
MONITORING
AKTIV
CVE-DATENBANK
LIVE
🔍
Community Radar & Live Chat
Sentinel Bot online • Live-Stream
Dein Cluster: Security Explorer
Match:
lädt…
Verbindung zum Community-Stream wird aufgebaut...
Bearbeitungsmodus — Senden überschreibt deine Nachricht
Community-Puls — was gerade passiert
lädt…
Aktivitäten deiner Analysten
lädt…
Neues Thema oder Eilmeldung einreichen

Reiche interessante Links, Zero-Days oder Debatten ein. Die Community entscheidet per Upvote über die Veröffentlichung.

Heiß diskutierte Einreichungen
📂 Keine gespeicherten Artikel vorhanden.
Zurück Ziehen Vor
Links: vorheriger Artikel • Rechts: nächster Artikel • unten: schließen
News NIS-2 Frühwarnung Tier-1 Intel TTP ⏱️ 3 Min vor 10 Min
Artikeldaten werden geladen...
↗ Original-Quelle