🕵️ SicherheitslückenHak5: Hackers Just Poisoned the Rust Supply Chain | Threat Wire(01.09.2026 um 14:00 Uhr)
🕵️ SicherheitslückenHak5: Hackers Found a Way Into Humanoid Robots | Threat Wire(04.09.2026 um 15:04 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten Bits und so #1021 (Passwort für Laufwerk)(31.08.2026 um 22:15 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten Bits und so #1022 (Wie Weißbier)(06.09.2026 um 20:39 Uhr)
🍏 iOS / Mac OSHue-App 6.0 ist da: das sind die Neuerungen(07.09.2026 um 17:21 Uhr)
🕵️ SicherheitslückenHak5: Hackers Just Poisoned the Rust Supply Chain | Threat Wire(01.09.2026 um 14:00 Uhr)
🕵️ SicherheitslückenHak5: Hackers Found a Way Into Humanoid Robots | Threat Wire(04.09.2026 um 15:04 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten Bits und so #1021 (Passwort für Laufwerk)(31.08.2026 um 22:15 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten Bits und so #1022 (Wie Weißbier)(06.09.2026 um 20:39 Uhr)
🍏 iOS / Mac OSHue-App 6.0 ist da: das sind die Neuerungen(07.09.2026 um 17:21 Uhr)

🔧 Programmierung 🕛 kürzlich 10 Min Lesezeit
0

Why Developers Are Switching from Firebase to Supabase (And You Should Too)

↗ Quelle (dev.to)
🗣️ Stimme:
📑 Inhaltsübersicht




Why Developers Are Switching from Firebase to Supabase (And You Should Too)



Something shifted in the developer world.



Firebase used to be the default answer to "what backend should I use?" For years, it was the obvious choice — fast setup, real-time database, free tier, backed by Google. Done.



But scroll through any developer community in 2026 — Reddit, X, Discord, Hacker News — and you will see the same pattern: developers are leaving Firebase for Supabase. Not just a few. Thousands.



This is not hype. There are real, practical reasons driving this migration. And if you are still on Firebase, this article will show you exactly why the switch is happening — and how to do it yourself.






The 4 Reasons Developers Are Leaving Firebase






1. The Pricing Time Bomb



This is the number one reason. Every Firebase developer has a horror story.



Firebase charges per document read and write. Sounds fine until your app gets traffic:




CODE
Small app (1,000 users):
├── 500K Firestore reads/month → $0.30
├── 100K Firestore writes/month → $0.18
└── Total: ~$0.50/month → Feels free!

Growing app (50,000 users):
├── 50M Firestore reads/month → $30
├── 10M Firestore writes/month → $18
├── Cloud Functions → $15
└── Total: ~$63/month → Getting expensive

Popular app (500,000 users):
├── 500M Firestore reads/month → $300
├── 100M Firestore writes/month → $180
├── Cloud Functions → $80
├── Bandwidth → $50
└── Total: ~$610/month → WHERE DID THIS COME FROM?






The problem is not just the cost — it's the unpredictability. A single viral moment, a bot scraping your app, or a poorly optimized query can spike your bill overnight.





Real story: A developer shipped a dashboard that fetched 100 Firestore documents on page load. With 10,000 daily active users, that is 1 million reads per day — 30 million per month — just from one page. The monthly bill jumped from $15 to $180 overnight.



Supabase pricing is flat. $25/month for Pro. Your app can make a billion queries — the price stays the same. You pay for compute and storage, not for how many times your users press a button.






2. NoSQL Hit a Wall



Firestore seemed great when your app was simple. But then you needed to:





  • Show a leaderboard → No ORDER BY with LIMIT across collections


  • Count total users → No COUNT — you read every document or maintain a counter


  • Join user data with orders → No JOINs — you denormalize or make multiple queries


  • Search by multiple fields → Requires composite indexes for every combination


  • Run analytics → Read every document, aggregate client-side



Here is what a simple "top customers" query looks like in both:



Supabase (PostgreSQL):




CODE
SELECT
users.name,
COUNT(orders.id) as order_count,
SUM(orders.total) as total_spent
FROM users
JOIN orders ON users.id = orders.user_id
WHERE orders.created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '30 days'
GROUP BY users.id
ORDER BY total_spent DESC
LIMIT 10;






One query. One database call. Instant.



Firebase (Firestore):




CODE
// Step 1: Get all orders from last 30 days
const ordersSnap = await getDocs(
query(
collection(db, 'orders'),
where('createdAt', '>', thirtyDaysAgo)
)
);

// Step 2: Group by userId (client-side)
const userTotals = {};
ordersSnap.forEach(doc => {
const order = doc.data();
if (!userTotals[order.userId]) {
userTotals[order.userId] = { count: 0, total: 0 };
}
userTotals[order.userId].count++;
userTotals[order.userId].total += order.total;
});

// Step 3: Sort client-side
const topCustomers = Object.entries(userTotals)
.sort(([, a], [, b]) => b.total - a.total)
.slice(0, 10);

// Step 4: Fetch each user's name (N more reads!)
const results = await Promise.all(
topCustomers.map(async ([userId, stats]) => {
const userDoc = await getDoc(doc(db, 'users', userId));
return { name: userDoc.data().name, ...stats };
})
);






That is potentially thousands of document reads for something PostgreSQL does in one query. And you are paying for every single read.






3. Vendor Lock-In Is Real



With Firebase:




  • Your data is in Firestore (proprietary NoSQL format)

  • Your auth is in Firebase Auth (Google-only)

  • Your functions are Cloud Functions (Google Cloud)

  • You cannot self-host any of it

  • Exporting data means manually converting documents to another format



If Google changes pricing, deprecates a feature, or you just want to move — you are rewriting your entire backend.



With Supabase:




  • Your data is in PostgreSQL — the industry standard

  • Export with pg_dump, import anywhere


  • Fully open-source — self-host with Docker

  • Zero proprietary formats




CODE
# Leave Supabase? Take your data with you.
pg_dump -h db.yourproject.supabase.co -U postgres -d postgres > backup.sql

# Restore to any PostgreSQL host
psql -h your-new-host.com -U postgres -d myapp < backup.sql








Supabase is the only major BaaS that is fully open-source. If Supabase disappeared tomorrow, you could self-host everything with Docker and keep building. Try doing that with Firebase.






4. Server-Side Rendering Changed Everything



Firebase was built for a world of client-side SPAs — single-page applications where JavaScript runs in the browser.



But the web moved on. Next.js App Router, Server Components, Server Actions — the future is server-first. And Firebase does not fit.



The Firebase problem with Next.js:




CODE
// You need TWO different Firebase SDKs
import { getFirestore } from 'firebase/firestore' // Client
import { getFirestore } from 'firebase-admin/firestore' // Server

// Different APIs, different auth contexts, different behavior
// Client SDK uses user tokens, Admin SDK bypasses security rules
// You constantly context-switch between two mental models






Supabase with Next.js:




CODE
// One API, works everywhere
import { createClient } from '@/lib/supabase/server'

// Server Component
export default async function Page() {
const supabase = await createClient()
const { data } = await supabase.from('posts').select('*')
return <PostList posts={data} />
}

// Server Action
export async function createPost(formData: FormData) {
const supabase = await createClient()
await supabase.from('posts').insert({ title: formData.get('title') })
revalidatePath('/posts')
}






Same client, same API, same mental model. Supabase's @supabase/ssr package was built for the server-first world.






How to Migrate: Step-by-Step



Ready to switch? Here is the practical migration path.






Step 1: Map Your Firestore Collections to PostgreSQL Tables



Firestore documents become rows. Collections become tables. Nested data gets normalized.



Before (Firestore):




CODE
users/
userId1/
name: "Alice"
email: "[email protected]"
orders/
orderId1/
product: "Widget"
amount: 29.99
status: "shipped"






After (PostgreSQL):




CODE
CREATE TABLE users (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT gen_random_uuid(),
name TEXT NOT NULL,
email TEXT UNIQUE NOT NULL,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT NOW()
);

CREATE TABLE orders (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT gen_random_uuid(),
user_id UUID REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
product TEXT NOT NULL,
amount DECIMAL(10,2) NOT NULL,
status TEXT DEFAULT 'pending',
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT NOW()
);

-- Enable RLS
ALTER TABLE users ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;
ALTER TABLE orders ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;

CREATE POLICY "Users see own data" ON users
FOR SELECT USING (auth.uid() = id);

CREATE POLICY "Users see own orders" ON orders
FOR SELECT USING (auth.uid() = user_id);









Step 2: Migrate Auth Users



Export from Firebase, import to Supabase:




CODE
// scripts/migrate-auth.ts
import admin from 'firebase-admin'
import { createClient } from '@supabase/supabase-js'

const firebase = admin.initializeApp({
credential: admin.credential.cert('./firebase-service-account.json')
})

const supabase = createClient(
process.env.SUPABASE_URL!,
process.env.SUPABASE_SERVICE_ROLE_KEY!
)

async function migrateUsers() {
const listResult = await firebase.auth().listUsers(1000)

for (const user of listResult.users) {
const { data, error } = await supabase.auth.admin.createUser({
email: user.email!,
email_confirm: true,
user_metadata: {
name: user.displayName,
avatar_url: user.photoURL,
firebase_uid: user.uid // keep reference
}
})

if (error) {
console.error(`Failed to migrate ${user.email}:`, error.message)
} else {
console.log(`Migrated: ${user.email}${data.user.id}`)
}
}
}

migrateUsers()








Send your users an email before migration: "We are upgrading our infrastructure. You may need to reset your password on your next login." This covers the password hash issue gracefully.






Step 3: Migrate Data



Export Firestore collections to PostgreSQL:




CODE
// scripts/migrate-data.ts
import admin from 'firebase-admin'
import { createClient } from '@supabase/supabase-js'

const db = admin.firestore()
const supabase = createClient(
process.env.SUPABASE_URL!,
process.env.SUPABASE_SERVICE_ROLE_KEY!
)

async function migrateCollection(
collectionName: string,
tableName: string,
transform: (doc: any) => any
) {
const snapshot = await db.collection(collectionName).get()
const rows = snapshot.docs.map(doc => transform({
firebase_id: doc.id,
...doc.data()
}))

// Insert in batches of 500
for (let i = 0; i < rows.length; i += 500) {
const batch = rows.slice(i, i + 500)
const { error } = await supabase.from(tableName).insert(batch)

if (error) {
console.error(`Batch ${i} failed:`, error.message)
} else {
console.log(`Migrated ${Math.min(i + 500, rows.length)}/${rows.length} ${collectionName}`)
}
}
}

// Migrate users first (referenced by other tables)
await migrateCollection('users', 'users', (doc) => ({
id: doc.firebase_id, // or map to new Supabase auth user ID
name: doc.name,
email: doc.email,
created_at: doc.createdAt?.toDate() || new Date()
}))

// Then migrate orders
await migrateCollection('orders', 'orders', (doc) => ({
user_id: doc.userId, // map to new user ID
product: doc.product,
amount: doc.amount,
status: doc.status,
created_at: doc.createdAt?.toDate() || new Date()
}))









Step 4: Update Your App Code



Replace Firebase SDK calls with Supabase equivalents:




CODE
// BEFORE: Firebase
import { collection, getDocs, addDoc, query, where } from 'firebase/firestore'

const q = query(collection(db, 'tasks'), where('userId', '==', user.uid))
const snapshot = await getDocs(q)
const tasks = snapshot.docs.map(doc => ({ id: doc.id, ...doc.data() }))

await addDoc(collection(db, 'tasks'), {
title: 'New task',
userId: user.uid,
completed: false
})









CODE
// AFTER: Supabase
import { createClient } from '@/lib/supabase/server'

const supabase = await createClient()

// RLS handles the user filtering automatically
const { data: tasks } = await supabase
.from('tasks')
.select('*')
.order('created_at', { ascending: false })

await supabase.from('tasks').insert({
title: 'New task',
// user_id is set automatically via RLS + auth.uid()
})








Notice how the Supabase version is shorter? You do not need to filter by user ID — Row Level Security handles it automatically. Less code, fewer bugs.






Step 5: Replace Firebase Services
















































Firebase Service Supabase Equivalent
Firestore PostgreSQL database
Firebase Auth Supabase Auth
Cloud Storage Supabase Storage
Cloud Functions Supabase Edge Functions + Next.js Server Actions
Hosting Vercel (for Next.js)
Realtime Database Supabase Realtime
Analytics PostHog or Plausible
Crashlytics Sentry
Cloud Messaging OneSignal or Novu





Migration Timeline



For a typical mid-size app:




CODE
Week 1:
├── Day 1-2: Set up Supabase project, design PostgreSQL schema
├── Day 3-4: Migrate auth users
└── Day 5: Migrate data

Week 2:
├── Day 1-3: Update app code (replace Firebase SDK with Supabase)
├── Day 4: Test everything
└── Day 5: Deploy + monitor








You do not have to migrate everything at once. Start with new features on Supabase. Migrate existing features one at a time. Run both in parallel until you are confident.






The Results After Switching



Developers who migrated report:





  • 60-80% lower monthly costs — flat pricing vs per-read billing


  • Faster development — SQL queries replace complex NoSQL workarounds


  • Better Next.js integration — first-party SSR support, Server Actions


  • Simpler codebase — one API everywhere, RLS handles authorization


  • Peace of mind — open source, no vendor lock-in, data portability






Should You Switch?



Switch now if:




  • Your Firebase bill is growing faster than your revenue

  • You are fighting Firestore's query limitations

  • You are building with Next.js (App Router)

  • You want data ownership and portability

  • You are starting a new project



Stay on Firebase if:




  • Your app is deeply integrated with Google Cloud services

  • You rely heavily on Firebase Cloud Messaging for push notifications

  • Your team has deep Firebase expertise and no SQL experience

  • Your app is small, stable, and Firebase costs are negligible



For everyone else — especially if you are building with Next.js — the switch to Supabase is one of the best decisions you will make in 2026.



Ready to start building? Check out our








  • Originally published at https://www.iloveblogs.blog

    Vollständiger Original-Bericht
    Ausführliche Details, Code-Beispiele & Hersteller-Stellungnahme auf dev.to.
    ↗ Original-Artikel auf dev.to lesen
    Wie bewertest du diesen Beitrag?
    1 Klick Feedback
    Teilen mit Netzwerk & Team:

    Community-Analysen & Experten-Meinungen 0

    Verfasse deine eigene Analyse, teile Workarounds oder diskutiere diesen Vorfall im Blog.
    Noch keine Community-Analyse verfasst. Markiere einen Textabschnitt oder klicke oben auf Eigene Analyse verfassen“!
    Community Pulse: Relevanz-Einschätzung
    1 Klick Experten-Votum
    🔴 Akute Relevanz 0%
    🟡 In Evaluierung 0%
    🟢 Keine Auswirkung 0%
    Spannende Innovation 0%
    Verwandte Story-Cluster & Quellen (Vektor-KI)
    Port 8095 Engine
    1 Quelle
    Hackers Just Poisoned the Rust Supply Chain | Threat Wire
    1 Quelle
    Hackers Found a Way Into Humanoid Robots | Threat Wire
    1 Quelle
    Bits und so #1021 (Passwort für Laufwerk)
    Ähnliche Beiträge
    🔍 Verwandte News

    Auch interessante Nachrichten Why Developers Are Switching from Firebase to Supabase (And You Should Too)

    Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: Developers, Switching, from, Firebase · 6 Treffer

    Laden...

    Videos werden geladen ...

    Laden...

    Beiträge werden geladen ...

    Laden...

    Videos werden geladen ...

    Laden...

    Beiträge werden geladen ...

    Laden...

    Videos werden geladen ...

    Laden...

    Beiträge werden geladen ...

    Laden...

    Videos werden geladen ...

    Laden...

    Beiträge werden geladen ...

    Laden...

    Videos werden geladen ...