📰 IT NachrichtenToday’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Saturay, Sept. 12(12.09.2026 um 07:43 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten Etzioni on AI: What kids tell chatbots, but not you(04.09.2026 um 16:05 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten OpenAI Wants to Know if an AI Industry Slowdown Would Even Be Legal(11.09.2026 um 01:28 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten OpenAI puts Pro subscriptions on hold due to Astra demand(10.09.2026 um 22:59 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten OpenAI’s feud with mathematicians is only escalating(11.09.2026 um 22:57 Uhr)
📰 IT NachrichtenToday’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Saturay, Sept. 12(12.09.2026 um 07:43 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten Etzioni on AI: What kids tell chatbots, but not you(04.09.2026 um 16:05 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten OpenAI Wants to Know if an AI Industry Slowdown Would Even Be Legal(11.09.2026 um 01:28 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten OpenAI puts Pro subscriptions on hold due to Astra demand(10.09.2026 um 22:59 Uhr)
🔧 AI Nachrichten OpenAI’s feud with mathematicians is only escalating(11.09.2026 um 22:57 Uhr)

🔧 Programmierung 🕛 vor 2 Monaten 3 Min Lesezeit SECURITY-FEED
0

How I built ZeroAudit — AI-powered SOC 2 compliance automation with AWS DynamoDB and Vercel

↗ Quelle (dev.to)
🗣️ Stimme:

SOC 2 Type II audits are painful. Auditors want evidence for 42 controls — who has access, are vulnerabilities patched on time, does every deployment go through review. Normally you pay a consultant $15-50k and spend months collecting screenshots and logs manually.



ZeroAudit connects to your tools and has an AI agent collect that evidence automatically, then classifies it against SOC 2 controls and generates an audit-ready report.



Live demo:



Why DynamoDB



I chose DynamoDB over Aurora because every query I need is org-scoped. There are no cross-org queries anywhere in the app. Single-table design with two GSIs covers all access patterns without joins. Aurora would've been overkill.



The schema uses PK: ORG#orgId with SK patterns for evidence, agent runs, integrations, and metadata. GSI1 queries evidence by control sorted by time. GSI2 queries controls by coverage status.



What's real vs simulated



Real data from live API calls: CC7.2 uses Dependabot alerts and code scanning from GitHub. CC8.1 uses pull requests and branch protection rules. CC6.1 uses repository collaborators. A1.2 uses IAM events and console logins from AWS CloudTrail. CC7.4 uses incident history from PagerDuty.



Simulated: CC6.2 would need Okta for real user provisioning data. The AI classification runs on whatever evidence it gets — real or mock.



AI agent architecture



The agent runs as a fire-and-forget background process. POST /api/agent/run returns 202 immediately. I tried doing it synchronously but Vercel functions timeout at 10 seconds and 6 controls plus AI calls take around 2 minutes.



Each control fetches real evidence from connected integrations, merges it with mock evidence for context, sends it to Grok (grok-3-mini via OpenAI-compatible API), parses the response for coverageStatus, riskLevel, and reasoning, then saves the artifact to DynamoDB.



The UI polls /api/agent/status every 3 seconds while showing a terminal animation. The animation is pre-scripted per control and doesn't wait for actual API responses — intentional UX decision.



I switched from Gemini to Grok mid-development because Gemini's free tier hit daily quota. Grok's OpenAI-compatible API made the switch a one-line change.



Stack



Frontend: Next.js App Router, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS. Database: AWS DynamoDB in eu-north-1, single-table design. AI: Grok API grok-3-mini. Auth: GitHub OAuth, custom implementation. Integrations: GitHub API, AWS CloudTrail, PagerDuty API. Deploy: Vercel.



DynamoDB note: the table is named soc2-autopilot in eu-north-1. DynamoDB only allows creating one GSI at a time while another is being backfilled — I hit this during setup and had to wait about 5 minutes between GSI creations.



What I'd do with more time



Okta integration for real user provisioning data, scheduled scans via Vercel Cron, fixing deduplication at the write level instead of read time, search that actually filters the evidence map, and CSV export for auditors.



Created for H0: Hack the Zero Stack Hackathon #H0Hackathon

Live demo:

Vollständiger Original-Bericht
Ausführliche Details, Code-Beispiele & Hersteller-Stellungnahme auf dev.to.
↗ Original-Artikel auf dev.to lesen
Wie bewertest du diesen Beitrag?
1 Klick Feedback
Teilen mit Netzwerk & Team:
Community Threat-Level Barometer
Live Votum

Wie stufst du das Risiko dieser Schwachstelle / Bedrohung für dein Unternehmen ein?

Noch keine Stimmen — schätze das Risiko als Erster ein.

Community-Analysen & Experten-Meinungen 0

Verfasse deine eigene Analyse, teile Workarounds oder diskutiere diesen Vorfall im Blog.
Noch keine Community-Analyse verfasst. Markiere einen Textabschnitt oder klicke oben auf Eigene Analyse verfassen“!
Community Pulse: Relevanz-Einschätzung
1 Klick Experten-Votum
🔴 Akute Relevanz 0%
🟡 In Evaluierung 0%
🟢 Keine Auswirkung 0%
Spannende Innovation 0%
Verwandte Story-Cluster & Quellen (Vektor-KI)
Port 8095 Engine
2 Quellen
Seattle Times sues Microsoft and OpenAI, alleging they trained their AI on its journalism
1 Quelle
Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Saturay, Sept. 12
1 Quelle
Etzioni on AI: What kids tell chatbots, but not you
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten How I built ZeroAudit — AI-powered SOC 2 compliance automation with AWS DynamoDB and Vercel

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: built, ZeroAudit, AIpowered, compliance · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...