🕵️ HackingReopening im Loft: Was ist neu da oben? - Wien - Kurier(17.09.2026 um 05:14 Uhr)
🕵️ HackingTangerhütte: Hacker greifen Verwaltung an - radio SAW(17.09.2026 um 06:32 Uhr)
🕵️ HackingReopening im Loft: Was ist neu da oben? - Wien - Kurier(17.09.2026 um 05:14 Uhr)
🕵️ HackingTangerhütte: Hacker greifen Verwaltung an - radio SAW(17.09.2026 um 06:32 Uhr)
🔧 Programmierung 🕛 vor 2 Monaten 2 Min Lesezeit
0

Checking whether ChatGPT actually recommends your product

↗ Quelle (dev.to)
🗣️ Stimme:
📑 Inhaltsübersicht

Ask ChatGPT or Perplexity "what's the best note-taking app" and you get a shortlist of three to five names. Either you're on it or you don't exist in that channel. And buying research keeps moving there.



People call measuring this GEO or AEO tracking now. The way most teams do it is pasting questions into chatbots by hand and eyeballing the answers. That stops scaling at about ten questions, and you can't trend it week over week.






Doing it programmatically



Don't scrape the chat UIs. It's fragile, against ToS, and breaks weekly. The engines all have official APIs with web search:




  • Perplexity's sonar models return answers with citations built in

  • OpenAI has gpt-4o-search-preview for live web search

  • Gemini's gemini-2.5-flash supports Google Search grounding



One OpenRouter key covers all three through a single endpoint, which keeps the code boring.



For each buyer question you care about, record four things per engine: was the brand mentioned, how early in the answer, was your domain cited as a source, and how often competitors appeared. That last one gives you share of voice.






The packaged version



I built this as an Apify actor: AI Brand Visibility Tracker. You give it a brand name, domain, competitors, and topics. It generates realistic buyer questions and returns one JSON row per check: brandMentioned, positionScore, brandCited, shareOfVoice, citedDomains, plus a per-engine summary. Schedule it weekly and you have an AI visibility trendline for client reports. $0.05 per check.






The field that actually matters



citedDomains is the actionable one. It tells you which sites the AI engines treat as sources for your category. Getting mentioned on those specific domains is how you move your visibility. It's link building, except the target list comes from the AI's own citations instead of a guess.

Vollständiger Original-Artikel
Den kompletten Beitrag mit allen Details direkt auf dev.to lesen.
↗ Original-Artikel auf dev.to lesen
Wie bewertest du diesen Beitrag?
1 Klick Feedback
Teilen mit Netzwerk & Team:

Community-Analysen & Experten-Meinungen 0

Verfasse deine eigene Analyse, teile Workarounds oder diskutiere diesen Vorfall im Blog.
Noch keine Community-Analyse verfasst. Markiere einen Textabschnitt oder klicke oben auf Eigene Analyse verfassen“!
Community Pulse: Relevanz-Einschätzung
1 Klick Experten-Votum
🔴 Akute Relevanz 0%
🟡 In Evaluierung 0%
🟢 Keine Auswirkung 0%
Spannende Innovation 0%
Verwandte Story-Cluster & Quellen (Vektor-KI)
Port 8095 Engine
2 Quellen
CVE-2022-44251 | TOTOLINK NR1800X 9.1.0u.6279_B20210910 setUssd ussd command injection (EUVD-2022-47200)
2 Quellen
CVE-2022-44253 | TOTOLINK LR350 9.3.5u.6369_B20220309 setDiagnosisCfg via improper authentication (EUVD-2022-47202)
1 Quelle
„Gerät finden“ auf Android kann sich jetzt auf Zuruf merken, wo ihr Gegenstände abgelegt habt
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten Checking whether ChatGPT actually recommends your product

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: Checking, whether, ChatGPT, actually · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...