Cost optimization is not a model-picker problem
When an LLM bill grows, the tempting answer is a blanket model downgrade. That is usually the wrong first move. A support classification, a retrieval rewrite, and a complex planning step do not have the same failure cost.
The useful question is: which calls have evidence that they can be cheaper?
, .
The useful design choice: analysis before automation
The interesting part is not a headline saving. It is converting a bill into a reviewable hypothesis:
- Collect a bounded, sanitized sample of real calls.
- Identify call groups that are candidates for a cheaper model.
- Run a task-specific regression suite against those groups.
- Automate routing only for groups that pass.
That sequence is boring in the best way. It creates an artifact an engineering team can challenge, reproduce, and roll back.
A local capture still has security boundaries
Frugon also includes frugon capture. Its and public repository are linked for further review.
SOCIAL SHARE CARD GENERATOR