Zum Hauptinhalt springen
tsecurity.de LIVE
Echtzeit-Radar & Feeds
Alle RSS Feeds
👥 Community & Social
Sichere ProgrammierungTCP vs UDP: The Two Ways to Move Data, and Why Neither Is "Better"(21.09.2026 um 09:31 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungBukan Sekadar Variabel, Tapi Nyawa dari Aplikasi Kamu! 🚀(21.09.2026 um 09:36 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungAI voice agent for customer service: what stops callers hanging up?(21.09.2026 um 09:42 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungReading a small model's confidence instead of its prose(21.09.2026 um 09:47 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungTCP vs UDP: The Two Ways to Move Data, and Why Neither Is "Better"(21.09.2026 um 09:31 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungBukan Sekadar Variabel, Tapi Nyawa dari Aplikasi Kamu! 🚀(21.09.2026 um 09:36 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungAI voice agent for customer service: what stops callers hanging up?(21.09.2026 um 09:42 Uhr)
Sichere ProgrammierungReading a small model's confidence instead of its prose(21.09.2026 um 09:47 Uhr)
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

Your AI agent shouldn't act on data it can't cite

A great rep once knew every account. An agent doesn't, unless you tell it what's true and how sure to be. Enrichment APIs hand your agent a value. An email. A job title. A funding round. The agent acts on it: writes the email, books the…

0
↗ Quelle (dev.to)
Reagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!

A great rep once knew every account. An agent doesn't, unless you tell it what's true and how sure to be.



Enrichment APIs hand your agent a value. An email. A job title. A funding round. The agent acts on it: writes the email, books the play, updates the CRM. But was that email verified, or guessed? Most APIs won't say. For a human scanning a spreadsheet, fine, you eyeball it. For an agent sending on your behalf, an unmarked guess is how it emails a made-up address with total confidence.



So we built abm.dev the other way round. Every field carries its own source and a confidence score. Not a blended trust rating for the record. Per field.



Eighty-nine canonical fields on an enrichment, forty-three on a person, forty-six on a company. Ten providers behind one call, LinkedIn, Companies House, Hunter, Perplexity, Tavily and five more, aggregated, deduped, reconciled. One key, one schema, no per-source bills. And every value comes back wrapped:




{
"work_email": {
"value": "[email protected]",
"confidence": 0.94,
"source": "hunter.io",
"verified": true
},
"employee_count": {
"value": 240,
"confidence": 0.61,
"source": "linkedin",
"note": "companies-house filing says 180; both kept"
}
}






When sources disagree, we don't silently pick a winner. We keep both and tell you. No fabricated data. No silent fallbacks.



That envelope is the whole point for an agent. It can gate on confidence: act on 0.94, hold on 0.61, route the low ones to a human. It can cite its own work, so when someone asks why did you email this person, there's a source, not a shrug. Grounding is the difference between an agent that builds pipeline and one that hallucinates it.



And the honest bit, because an agent needs the honest bit: it's near-useless on companies with no public footprint. The difference is it tells you when it's guessing, instead of guessing in a confident voice.



Three verbs sit on top of the same idea. Search the accounts and people. Enrich them into cited fields. Create the records and the outreach. Over a plain REST call, or as a Claude Connector your agent talks to directly over MCP.



If you're building anything that acts on B2B data without a human in the loop, come make it prove itself. There's a free playground at abm.dev, and LAUNCHCODES puts about twenty in credits on your account to try it on an account you know cold. Tell me where it's wrong, that's the useful part.

Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten Your AI agent shouldn't act on data it can't cite

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: Your, agent, shouldnt, data · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Zum Aktualisieren ziehen
ZERO-DAY CVE-2026-94030 | A security vulnerability has been detected in SerenityOS up to 3d83e4509…
Advisory →
TTS Reader • tsecurity.de Voice
tsecurity.de Icon
tsecurity.de App
Offline-Lesen, Eilmeldungen & 0ms Ladezeit

Installiere tsecurity.de direkt auf deinen Home-Bildschirm für das ultimative Vollbild-Magazinerlebnis ohne Browser-Leisten.

Nächster Beitrag
Themen-Radar & Intelligence Matrix
Echtzeit-Taxonomie nach Angriffsvektoren & Plattformen

tsecurity.de Live Threat Radar

🔴 LIVE RADAR
MONITORING
AKTIV
CVE-DATENBANK
LIVE
🔍
Community Radar & Live Chat
Sentinel Bot online • Live-Stream
Dein Cluster: Security Explorer
Match:
lädt…
Verbindung zum Community-Stream wird aufgebaut...
Bearbeitungsmodus — Senden überschreibt deine Nachricht
Community-Puls — was gerade passiert
lädt…
Aktivitäten deiner Analysten
lädt…
Neues Thema oder Eilmeldung einreichen

Reiche interessante Links, Zero-Days oder Debatten ein. Die Community entscheidet per Upvote über die Veröffentlichung.

Heiß diskutierte Einreichungen
🔖 Gespeicherte Artikel
📂 Keine gespeicherten Artikel vorhanden.
Zurück Ziehen Vor
Links: vorheriger Artikel Rechts: nächster Artikel unten: schließen
News NIS-2 Frühwarnung Tier-1 Intel ⏱️ 3 Min vor 10 Min
Artikeldaten werden geladen...

Zurück: vorheriger Vor: nächster
↗ Original-Quelle
Social Reaktionen Deine Reaktion zählt
Einstufung & Relevanz-Poll 0 Stimmen
In sozialen Netzwerken teilen 1-Klick