MonkeyCode Under Parallel Tasks: Do the Patches Still Know Their Base Commit?

Two coding-agent tasks start from commit A. Task X edits authentication. Task Y edits logging. While both run, a human pushes commit B.

If the patches do not identify their base, “apply both” is unsafe. Parallel agent sessions are a consistency problem, not only a speed feature.

Here is a black-box experiment for and SaaS.

Limitations: two tasks are not a load test and cannot prove process- or tenant-level isolation.

Disclosure: I'm a MonkeyCode user sharing my own experience, not affiliated with the project. This is one of several independently useful technical articles published by accounts managed by the same operator; it is not an independent endorsement.

Which event should force a restart from a new base: human commit B, overlapping patches, or either one?